XML 169 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.1.u1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2022
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2021
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2020
USD ($)
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table
Pay-Versus-Performance
The following section has been prepared in accordance with the SEC’s pay versus performance disclosure rules mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act. Under these rules, the SEC has developed a new way to calculate executive pay, referred to as “compensation actually paid,” or CAP, which amounts are then compared to certain performance measures defined by the SEC.
The CAP does not reflect the value received or realized by our NEOs or how the compensation committee evaluates compensation decisions in light of company performance.
Please refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 38 for a discussion of our executive compensation program objectives and the ways in which we design our program to align executive compensation with company performance.
The CAP values are derived from the total compensation amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table, but adjusts those amounts to replace the grant date fair values of equity awards granted during the year with the fair value of equity awards granted during the year as of the end of the year, plus changes in fair value of any outstanding unvested awards granted in prior years. Thus, unlike the Summary Compensation Table that only factors in current year equity awards, the CAP reflects year-over-year changes in value of all outstanding unvested equity awards and equity awards vesting during the year. The CAP values also replace the change in pension value reported with the pension plan service cost or prior service cost for the year.
 
Year
  
Summary
Compensation
Table
Total for PEO
(1)
   
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO
(2)
   
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for
Non-PEO

NEOs
(3)
   
Average 
Compensation 
Actually Paid 
to
Non-PEO 

NEOs
(4)
   
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
   
Net Income
($ in MM)
(6)
   
Return on
Investment
(7)
 
 
Total
Stockholder
Return
   
Peer Group
Total
Stockholder
Return
(5)
 
2023
  
 
$24,017,321
 
 
 
$25,276,163
 
 
 
$5,123,031
 
 
 
$5,798,178
 
 
 
$338.45
 
 
 
$218.23
 
 
 
$1,848
 
 
 
17.77%
 
 2022
  
 
20,521,929
 
 
 
7,164,637
 
 
 
5,191,453
 
 
 
3,931,649
 
 
 
297.71
 
 
 
178.99
 
 
 
3,468
 
 
 
26.79%
 
 2021
  
 
19,111,894
 
 
 
75,686,762
 
 
 
4,086,801
 
 
 
14,711,132
 
 
 
321.27
 
 
 
157.75
 
 
 
4,306
 
 
 
38.50%
 
 2020
  
 
16,720,881
 
 
 
71,047,496
 
 
 
4,976,641
 
 
 
23,276,187
 
 
 
199.07
 
 
 
116.44
 
 
 
599
 
 
 
11.69%
 
 
(1)
For each fiscal year included in the table, Richard C. Adkerson served as our principal executive officer (PEO).
 
(2)
The amounts reported in this column represent the CAP for Mr. Adkerson, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
The amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or delivered to Mr. Adkerson during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the adjustments reflected in the table below were made to Mr. Adkerson’s total compensation for each year reflected in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) to determine the CAP values. Mr. Adkerson has reached the maximum years of service under the SERP and thus FCX did not recognize a service cost for him during any of the years reflected in the table.
SCT to CAP Reconciliation — PEO (A)
 
               
Adjust Value of Current
Year’s Equity Grant
   
Adjust For Incremental
Increase/(Decrease)
in
Value of All Other Outstanding Equity Grants
       
Year
 
SCT Total
   
Subtract

Pension
Value
reported
in SCT
   
Subtract

Grant Date
Fair Value
as reported
in SCT
   
Add
Fair
Value
at 12/31
   
Add 
Change
in Fair Value
of Unvested
Awards as
of 12/31
   
Add 
Change
in Fair Value
of Vested
Awards
during Year
   
Forfeited
during
Year
   
Accrued
Dividend
Equivalents
   
CAP
 
2023
 
$
24,017,321
 
 
$
(3,904,609
 
$
(12,518,840
 
$
12,051,685
 
 
$
134,268
 
 
$
5,037,937
 
 
$
   —
 
 
$
458,401
 
 
$
25,276,163
 
2022
 
 
20,521,929
 
 
 
(3,505,075
 
 
(11,036,050
 
 
10,018,375
 
 
 
(5,674,233
 
 
(4,664,116
 
 
 
 
 
1,503,807
 
 
 
7,164,637
 
2021
 
 
19,111,894
 
 
 
(3,163,533
 
 
(9,818,515
 
 
24,933,600
 
 
 
25,690,784
 
 
 
18,530,775
 
 
 
 
 
 
401,757
 
 
 
75,686,762
 
2020
 
 
16,720,881
 
 
 
(2,869,719
 
 
(9,683,022
 
 
39,619,191
 
 
 
23,782,666
 
 
 
3,477,499
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
71,047,496
 
 
  (A)
In determining the fair value of unvested equity awards, we applied the same methodology used to determine grant date fair value of equity awards for purposes of accounting for share-based payments as described in our 2023 Form
10-K,
but calculated fair value as of the last day of the year. Factors impacting the fair value of the equity awards primarily relate to the price of our common stock at year end, as well as the projected and actual achievement of performance goals related to our PSUs.
 
(3)
Our NEOs (other than Mr. Adkerson) for each fiscal year included in the table were as follows: 2023 and 2022 — Kathleen L. Quirk, Maree E. Robertson, Stephen T. Higgins, and Douglas N. Currault II; 2021 — Kathleen L. Quirk, Stephen T. Higgins, and Douglas N. Currault II; 2020 — Kathleen L. Quirk and Harry M. Conger. The amounts reported in this column represent the average of the total compensation reported for each named executive officer (excluding Mr. Adkerson) in the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year.
 
(4)
The amounts reported in this column represent the average CAP for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Adkerson), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
The amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or delivered to the NEOs as a group during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the adjustments reflected in the table below were made to the average total compensation for the NEOs for each year reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52 to determine the CAP values. Mr. Conger and Mr. Higgins, the only other NEOs who have pension benefits, each reached the maximum years of service under the SRP and thus FCX did not recognize a service cost for either executive during any of the years reflected in the table.
SCT to CAP Reconciliation — Average of All Other NEOs (A)
 
                
Adjust Value of Current
Year’s Equity Grant
   
Adjust For Incremental
Increase/(Decrease)
in
Value of All Other Outstanding Equity Grants
       
Year
 
SCT Total
    
Subtract

Pension
Value
reported
in SCT
   
Subtract

Grant Date
Fair Value
as reported
in SCT
   
Add

Fair Value
at 12/31
   
Add 
Change
in Fair Value
of Unvested
Awards as
of 12/31
   
Add 
Change
in Fair Value
of Awards
Vested
during Year
   
Forfeited
during
Year
   
Accrued
Dividend
Equivalents
   
CAP
 
 2023 
 
$
5,123,031
 
  
$
(311
 
$
(3,266,249
 
$
3,152,590
 
 
$
113,415
 
 
$
576,402
 
 
$
 
 
$
99,300
 
 
$
5,798,178
 
 2022
 
 
5,191,453
 
  
 
 
 
 
(3,358,315
 
 
2,970,644
 
 
 
(600,525
 
 
(459,070
 
 
 
 
 
187,462
 
 
 
3,931,649
 
 2021
 
 
4,086,801
 
  
 
 
 
 
(2,132,295
 
 
4,334,855
 
 
 
4,842,400
 
 
 
3,498,433
 
 
 
 
 
 
80,938
 
 
 
14,711,132
 
 2020
 
 
4,976,641
 
  
 
(151,488
 
 
(3,541,824
 
 
11,427,713
 
 
 
9,245,824
 
 
 
1,569,827
 
 
 
(248,590
 
 
(1,917
 
 
23,276,187
 
 
  (A)
In determining the fair value of unvested equity awards, we applied the same methodology used to determine grant date fair value of equity awards for purposes of accounting for share-based payments as described in our 2023 Form
10-K,
but calculated fair value as of the last day of the year. Factors impacting the fair value of the equity awards primarily relate to the price of our common stock at year end, as well as the projected and actual achievement of performance goals related to our PSUs.
 
(5)
Represents the weighted peer group total stockholder return, or “TSR,” weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index, which is the industry line peer group reported in our performance graph under Item 201(e) of Regulation
S-K
included in our Annual Report.
 
(6)
Net income represents net income attributable to common stock as reported in our consolidated financial statements that appear in our Annual Report on Form
10-K.
 
(7)
While we use numerous financial and
non-financial
performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance under our AIP and LTIP, we believe that ROI represents the most important performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) we use to link compensation actually paid to our executive officers to company performance. Per SEC guidance, the table reflects our annual ROI for each year; however, we use a three-year average ROI to measure performance for purposes of the PSUs granted under our LTIP.
     
Company Selected Measure Name ROI      
Named Executive Officers, Footnote Our NEOs (other than Mr. Adkerson) for each fiscal year included in the table were as follows: 2023 and 2022 — Kathleen L. Quirk, Maree E. Robertson, Stephen T. Higgins, and Douglas N. Currault II; 2021 — Kathleen L. Quirk, Stephen T. Higgins, and Douglas N. Currault II; 2020 — Kathleen L. Quirk and Harry M. Conger. The amounts reported in this column represent the average of the total compensation reported for each named executive officer (excluding Mr. Adkerson) in the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year.      
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote Represents the weighted peer group total stockholder return, or “TSR,” weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index, which is the industry line peer group reported in our performance graph under Item 201(e) of Regulation
S-K
included in our Annual Report.
     
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 24,017,321 $ 20,521,929 $ 19,111,894 $ 16,720,881
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount $ 25,276,163 7,164,637 75,686,762 71,047,496
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote
(2)
The amounts reported in this column represent the CAP for Mr. Adkerson, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
The amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or delivered to Mr. Adkerson during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the adjustments reflected in the table below were made to Mr. Adkerson’s total compensation for each year reflected in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) to determine the CAP values. Mr. Adkerson has reached the maximum years of service under the SERP and thus FCX did not recognize a service cost for him during any of the years reflected in the table.
SCT to CAP Reconciliation — PEO (A)
 
               
Adjust Value of Current
Year’s Equity Grant
   
Adjust For Incremental
Increase/(Decrease)
in
Value of All Other Outstanding Equity Grants
       
Year
 
SCT Total
   
Subtract

Pension
Value
reported
in SCT
   
Subtract

Grant Date
Fair Value
as reported
in SCT
   
Add
Fair
Value
at 12/31
   
Add 
Change
in Fair Value
of Unvested
Awards as
of 12/31
   
Add 
Change
in Fair Value
of Vested
Awards
during Year
   
Forfeited
during
Year
   
Accrued
Dividend
Equivalents
   
CAP
 
2023
 
$
24,017,321
 
 
$
(3,904,609
 
$
(12,518,840
 
$
12,051,685
 
 
$
134,268
 
 
$
5,037,937
 
 
$
   —
 
 
$
458,401
 
 
$
25,276,163
 
2022
 
 
20,521,929
 
 
 
(3,505,075
 
 
(11,036,050
 
 
10,018,375
 
 
 
(5,674,233
 
 
(4,664,116
 
 
 
 
 
1,503,807
 
 
 
7,164,637
 
2021
 
 
19,111,894
 
 
 
(3,163,533
 
 
(9,818,515
 
 
24,933,600
 
 
 
25,690,784
 
 
 
18,530,775
 
 
 
 
 
 
401,757
 
 
 
75,686,762
 
2020
 
 
16,720,881
 
 
 
(2,869,719
 
 
(9,683,022
 
 
39,619,191
 
 
 
23,782,666
 
 
 
3,477,499
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
71,047,496
 
 
  (A)
In determining the fair value of unvested equity awards, we applied the same methodology used to determine grant date fair value of equity awards for purposes of accounting for share-based payments as described in our 2023 Form
10-K,
but calculated fair value as of the last day of the year. Factors impacting the fair value of the equity awards primarily relate to the price of our common stock at year end, as well as the projected and actual achievement of performance goals related to our PSUs.
     
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 5,123,031 5,191,453 4,086,801 4,976,641
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ 5,798,178 3,931,649 14,711,132 23,276,187
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote
(4)
The amounts reported in this column represent the average CAP for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Adkerson), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
The amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or delivered to the NEOs as a group during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the adjustments reflected in the table below were made to the average total compensation for the NEOs for each year reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52 to determine the CAP values. Mr. Conger and Mr. Higgins, the only other NEOs who have pension benefits, each reached the maximum years of service under the SRP and thus FCX did not recognize a service cost for either executive during any of the years reflected in the table.
SCT to CAP Reconciliation — Average of All Other NEOs (A)
 
                
Adjust Value of Current
Year’s Equity Grant
   
Adjust For Incremental
Increase/(Decrease)
in
Value of All Other Outstanding Equity Grants
       
Year
 
SCT Total
    
Subtract

Pension
Value
reported
in SCT
   
Subtract

Grant Date
Fair Value
as reported
in SCT
   
Add

Fair Value
at 12/31
   
Add 
Change
in Fair Value
of Unvested
Awards as
of 12/31
   
Add 
Change
in Fair Value
of Awards
Vested
during Year
   
Forfeited
during
Year
   
Accrued
Dividend
Equivalents
   
CAP
 
 2023 
 
$
5,123,031
 
  
$
(311
 
$
(3,266,249
 
$
3,152,590
 
 
$
113,415
 
 
$
576,402
 
 
$
 
 
$
99,300
 
 
$
5,798,178
 
 2022
 
 
5,191,453
 
  
 
 
 
 
(3,358,315
 
 
2,970,644
 
 
 
(600,525
 
 
(459,070
 
 
 
 
 
187,462
 
 
 
3,931,649
 
 2021
 
 
4,086,801
 
  
 
 
 
 
(2,132,295
 
 
4,334,855
 
 
 
4,842,400
 
 
 
3,498,433
 
 
 
 
 
 
80,938
 
 
 
14,711,132
 
 2020
 
 
4,976,641
 
  
 
(151,488
 
 
(3,541,824
 
 
11,427,713
 
 
 
9,245,824
 
 
 
1,569,827
 
 
 
(248,590
 
 
(1,917
 
 
23,276,187
 
 
  (A)
In determining the fair value of unvested equity awards, we applied the same methodology used to determine grant date fair value of equity awards for purposes of accounting for share-based payments as described in our 2023 Form
10-K,
but calculated fair value as of the last day of the year. Factors impacting the fair value of the equity awards primarily relate to the price of our common stock at year end, as well as the projected and actual achievement of performance goals related to our PSUs.
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return
LOGO
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income
LOGO
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure
LOGO
     
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group
LOGO
     
Tabular List, Table
Performance Measures
As described in greater detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program reflects a
pay-for-performance
philosophy. The metrics that we use under our AIP and LTIP are selected with the objective of linking our NEO’s compensation to the key metrics driving our future growth and incentivizing our NEOs to focus on critical elements of our strategic priorities each year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the most important financial and
non-financial
performance measures used to link executive compensation actually paid to our NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to our performance are as follows:
 
 
MOST IMPORTANT PERFORMANCE MEASURES (WITHOUT RANKING)
§
  Return on Investment
  
§
  Relative TSR
§
  Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA
  
§
  Copper Sales
     
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 338.45 297.71 321.27 199.07
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 218.23 178.99 157.75 116.44
Net Income (Loss) $ 1,848,000,000 $ 3,468,000,000 $ 4,306,000,000 $ 599,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount 0.1777 0.2679 0.385 0.1169
PEO Name Richard C. Adkerson      
Measure:: 1        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Return on Investment      
Measure:: 2        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA      
Measure:: 3        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Relative TSR      
Measure:: 4        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Copper Sales      
PEO | Pension Value Reported In SCT [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ (3,904,609) $ (3,505,075) $ (3,163,533) $ (2,869,719)
PEO | Grant Date Fair Value As Reported In SCT [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (12,518,840) (11,036,050) (9,818,515) (9,683,022)
PEO | Fair Value at 12/31        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 12,051,685 10,018,375 24,933,600 39,619,191
PEO | Change In Fair Value Of Unvested Awards [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 134,268 (5,674,233) 25,690,784 23,782,666
PEO | Change In Fair Value Of Vested Awards During Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 5,037,937 (4,664,116) 18,530,775 3,477,499
PEO | Forfeited During Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 0 0 0
PEO | Accrued Dividend Equivalents [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 458,401 1,503,807 401,757 0
Non-PEO NEO | Pension Value Reported In SCT [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (311) 0 0 (151,488)
Non-PEO NEO | Grant Date Fair Value As Reported In SCT [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (3,266,249) (3,358,315) (2,132,295) (3,541,824)
Non-PEO NEO | Fair Value at 12/31        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 3,152,590 2,970,644 4,334,855 11,427,713
Non-PEO NEO | Change In Fair Value Of Unvested Awards [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 113,415 (600,525) 4,842,400 9,245,824
Non-PEO NEO | Change In Fair Value Of Vested Awards During Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 576,402 (459,070) 3,498,433 1,569,827
Non-PEO NEO | Forfeited During Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 0 0 (248,590)
Non-PEO NEO | Accrued Dividend Equivalents [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ 99,300 $ 187,462 $ 80,938 $ (1,917)