FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

Fair value accounting guidance includes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 inputs) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs). FCX recognizes transfers between levels at the end of the reporting period. Other than with respect to oil and gas derivatives assumed in the acquisition of PXP, FCX did not have any significant transfers in or out of Level 1, 2, or 3 for second-quarter 2013.

A summary of the carrying amount and fair value of FCX’s financial instruments other than cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and dividends payable follows (in millions):



	At June 30, 2013
	Carrying		Fair Value
	Amount		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Investment securities (current and long-term):^{a, b, c}
Money market funds	$	80	$	80	$	80	$	—	$	—
U.S. core fixed income fund	21		21		—		21		—
Equity securities	6		6		6		—		—
Total investment securities	107		107		86		21		—

Trust assets (long-term):^{a, c}
U.S. core fixed income fund	48		48		—		48		—
Government mortgage-backed securities	37		37		—		37		—
Corporate bonds	26		26		—		26		—
Government bonds and notes	21		21		—		21		—
Asset-backed securities	16		16		—		16		—
Money market funds	8		8		8		—		—
Municipal bonds	1		1		—		1		—
Total trust assets	157		157		8		149		—

Derivatives:^{a, d}
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchase
contracts in a gross asset position	11		11		—		11		—
Crude oil and natural gas swaps	81		81		—		81		—
Total derivative assets	92		92		—		92		—

Total assets			$	356	$	94	$	262	$	—

Liabilities
Derivatives:^a
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchase
contracts in a gross liability position^d	$	121	$	121	$	—	$	121	$	—
Crude oil options^d	116		116		—		—		116
Copper futures and swap contracts^d	14		14		13		1		—
Copper forward contracts^d	3		3		2		1		—
Plains Offshore warrants^e	$	79	$	79	$	—	$	—	$	79
Total derivative liabilities	333		333		15		123		195

Long-term debt, including current portion^f	21,215		20,335		—		20,335		—

Total liabilities			$	20,668	$	15	$	20,458	$	195



	At December 31, 2012
	Carrying		Fair Value
	Amount		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Investment securities (current and long-term):
MMR investment^g	$	446	$	539	$	—	$	539	$	—
U.S. core fixed income fund^{a, c}	22		22		—		22		—
Money market funds^{a, c}	16		16		16		—		—
Equity securities^{a, c}	8		8		8		—		—
Total investment securities	492		585		24		561		—

Trust assets (long-term):^{a, c}
U.S. core fixed income fund	50		50		—		50		—
Government mortgage-backed securities	36		36		—		36		—
Corporate bonds	30		30		—		30		—
Government bonds and notes	24		24		—		24		—
Asset-backed securities	15		15		—		15		—
Money market funds	7		7		7		—		—
Municipal bonds	1		1		—		1		—
Total trust assets	163		163		7		156		—

Derivatives:^{a, d}
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchase
contracts in a gross asset position	36		36		—		36		—
Copper futures and swaps contracts	5		5		5		—		—
Total derivative assets	41		41		5		36		—

Total assets			$	789	$	36	$	753	$	—

Liabilities
Derivatives:^{a, d}
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchase
contracts in a gross liability position	$	27	$	27	$	—	$	27	$	—
Copper futures and swap contracts	1		1		1		—		—
Total derivative liabilities	28		28		1		27		—

Long-term debt, including current portion^f	3,527		3,589		—		3,589		—

Total liabilities			$	3,617	$	1	$	3,616	$	—


a.	Recorded at fair value.


b.	Investment securities excluded $238 million of time deposits at June 30, 2013.


c.	Current portion included in other current assets and long-term portion included in other assets.


d.	Crude oil options are net of $478 million for deferred premiums and accrued interest at June 30, 2013. Refer to Note 9 for further discussion and balance sheet classifications.


e.	Included in other liabilities. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion.


f.	Recorded at cost except for debt acquired in the PXP, MMR and FMC acquisitions, which were recorded at fair value at the acquisition dates.


g.	Recorded at cost and included in other assets.

Valuation Techniques

Money market funds are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets.

Fixed income securities (U.S. core fixed income funds, government securities, corporate bonds, asset-backed securities and municipal bonds) are valued using a bid evaluation or a mid evaluation. A bid evaluation is an estimated price at which a dealer would pay for a security. A mid evaluation is the average of the estimated price at which a dealer would sell a security and the estimated price at which a dealer would pay for a security. These evaluations are based on quoted prices, if available, or models that use observable inputs and, as such, are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Equity securities are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded and, as such, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

FCX’s embedded derivatives on provisional copper concentrate, copper cathode and gold purchases and sales have critical inputs of quoted monthly LME or COMEX copper forward prices and the London PM gold forward price at each reporting date based on the month of maturity; however, FCX's contracts themselves are not traded on an exchange. As a result, these derivatives are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

FCX's derivative financial instruments for crude oil options are valued using an option pricing model, which uses various inputs including IntercontinentalExchange Inc. (ICE) crude oil prices, volatilities, interest rates and contract terms. FCX's derivative financial instruments for crude oil and natural gas swaps are valued using a pricing model that has various inputs including NYMEX and ICE price quotations, interest rates and contract terms. Valuations are adjusted for credit quality, using the counterparties' credit quality for asset balances and FCX's credit quality for liability balances. For asset balances, FCX uses the credit default swap value for counterparties when available or the spread between the risk-free interest rate and the yield rate on the counterparties' publicly traded debt for similar instruments (which considers the impact of netting agreements on counterparty credit risk, including whether the position with the counterparty is a net asset or net liability). The 2013 and 2014 crude oil and natural gas swaps are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because the inputs used in the valuation models are directly or indirectly observable for substantially the full term of the instruments. The 2013, 2014 and 2015 crude oil options are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because the inputs used in the valuation models are not observable for substantially the full term of the instruments. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the crude oil options are implied volatilities and deferred premiums. Significant increases (decreases) in implied volatilities in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. The implied volatilities ranged from 18 percent to 62 percent, with a weighted average of 23 percent. The deferred premiums ranged from $5.15 per Bbl to $7.22 per Bbl, with a weighted average of $6.35 per Bbl. Refer to Note 9 for further discussion of these derivative financial instruments.

FCX’s derivative financial instruments for copper futures and swap contracts and copper forward contracts that are traded on the respective exchanges are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted monthly COMEX or LME prices at each reporting date based on the month of maturity (refer to Note 9 for further discussion). Certain of these contracts are traded on the over-the-counter market and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy based on COMEX and LME forward prices.

The preliminary fair value of FCX's warrants associated with the Plains Offshore Preferred Stock was estimated using a valuation model based on the estimated fair value of the underlying Plains Offshore common stock, risk-free interest rates and probability-weighted cash flows. The assumptions used in the valuation model are highly subjective because the common stock is not publicly traded. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion of the Plains Offshore warrants.

Long-term debt, including the current portion, is valued using prices obtained from a readily available pricing source and, as such, is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

At December 31, 2012, FCX's investment in MMR's 5.75% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (MMR investment) was not actively traded; therefore, FCX valued its MMR investment based on a pricing simulation model that used the quoted market prices of MMR's publicly traded common stock as the most significant observable input and other inputs, such as expected volatility, expected settlement date and risk-free interest rate. Therefore, this investment was classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. MMR's 5.75% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock was canceled in connection with the acquisition of MMR.

A summary of the changes in the fair value of FCX's Level 3 derivative financial instruments for the six months ended June 30, 2013, follows (in millions):



	Crude Oil			Plains Offshore
	Options			Warrants
Fair value at December 31, 2012	$	—		$	—
Derivative financial instruments assumed in the PXP acquisition	(83		)	(79		)
Net unrealized losses included in earnings related to
assets and liabilities still held at the end of the period^a	(33		)	—
Fair value at June 30, 2013	$	(116	)	$	(79	)


a.	Realized and unrealized (losses) gains are recorded in revenue. There were no realized gains for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

The techniques described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while FCX believes its valuation techniques are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different techniques or assumptions to determine fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date. There have been no changes in the techniques used at June 30, 2013, except as otherwise described above.

Refer to Note 2 for the levels within the fair value hierarchy associated with other assets acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interest related to second-quarter 2013 acquisitions.