XML 114 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
Fair value accounting guidance includes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 inputs) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs).
Level 1
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2
Quoted prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means; and
Level 3
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

A summary of FCX’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis follows:
 
Fair Value at December 31, 2011
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
4,007

 
$
4,007

 
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government mortgage-backed securities
47

 

 
47

 

U.S. core fixed income fund
46

 

 
46

 

Government bonds and notes
21

 

 
21

 

Corporate bonds
19

 

 
19

 

Money market funds
9

 
9

 

 

Asset-backed securities
9

 

 
9

 

Municipal bonds
1

 

 
1

 

Total trust assets
152

 
9

 
143

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity securities
9

 
9

 

 

Money market funds
2

 
2

 

 

Total available-for-sale securities
11

 
11

 

 

Derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchases
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
contracts
72

 

 
72

 

Copper futures and swap contracts
3

 
3

 

 

Copper forward contracts
2

 
1

 
1

 

Total derivative assets
77

 
4

 
73

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
$
4,247

 
$
4,031

 
$
216

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchases
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
contracts
$
(82
)
 
$

 
$
(82
)
 
$

Copper futures and swap contracts
(13
)
 
(11
)
 
(2
)
 

Total derivative liabilities
$
(95
)
 
$
(11
)
 
$
(84
)
 
$



 
Fair Value at December 31, 2010
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
3,584

 
$
3,584

 
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trust assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. core fixed income fund
42

 

 
42

 

Government mortgage-backed securities
35

 

 
35

 

Corporate bonds
23

 

 
23

 

Asset-backed securities
22

 

 
22

 

Money market funds
15

 
15

 

 

Government bonds and notes
10

 

 
10

 

Municipal bonds
1

 

 
1

 

Total trust assets
148

 
15

 
133

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:a
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity securities
9

 
9

 

 

Money market funds
6

 
6

 

 

Total available-for-sale securities
15

 
15

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchases
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

contractsb
357

 

 
357

 

Copper futures and swap contracts
18

 
18

 

 

Total derivative assets
375

 
18

 
357

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
$
4,122

 
$
3,632

 
$
490

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Derivatives:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchases
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

contractsb
$
(115
)
 
$

 
$
(115
)
 
$

Copper forward contracts
(10
)
 
(1
)
 
(9
)
 

Total derivative liabilities
$
(125
)
 
$
(1
)
 
$
(124
)
 
$


a.
Excluded were $19 million of time deposits.
b.
At the end of 2011, FCX reevaluated its level determination for its embedded derivatives in provisional sales/purchases contracts, including those reported at December 31, 2010. Although the critical input in these measurements are quoted market prices for copper, gold and molybdenum, the contracts themselves are not traded on an exchange and, therefore, are more appropriately classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Valuation Techniques

Money market funds are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets.

Fixed income securities (government and agency securities, U.S. core fixed income fund, corporate bonds and asset-backed securities) are valued using a bid evaluation or a mid evaluation. A bid evaluation is an estimated price at which a dealer would pay for a security. A mid evaluation is the average of the estimated price at which a dealer would sell a security and the estimated price at which a dealer would pay for a security. These evaluations are based on quoted prices, if available, or models that use observable inputs and, as such, are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Equity securities are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded and, as such, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

FCX’s embedded derivatives on provisional copper concentrate, copper cathode and gold purchases and sales have critical inputs of quoted monthly LME or COMEX forward prices (copper) and the London Bullion Market Association forward price (gold) at each reporting date based on the month of maturity; however, FCX's contracts themselves are not traded on an exchange, as such, these derivatives are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. FCX’s embedded derivatives on provisional molybdenum purchases have critical inputs based on the latest average weekly Metals Week Molybdenum Dealer Oxide prices; however, FCX's contracts themselves are not traded on an exchange, as such, these derivatives are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

FCX’s derivative financial instruments for copper futures and swap contracts and forward contracts that are traded on the respective exchanges are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted monthly COMEX or LME forward prices at each reporting date based on the month of maturity (refer to Note 15 for further discussion). Certain of these contracts are traded on the over-the-counter market and are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The techniques described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while FCX believes its valuation techniques are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different techniques or assumptions to determine fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measured at the reporting date. There have been no changes in the techniques used at December 31, 2011.

The carrying value for certain FCX financial instruments (i.e., accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, dividends payable, and Rio Tinto's share of joint venture cash flows) approximate fair value and, therefore, have been excluded from the table below. A summary of the carrying amount and fair value of FCX’s other financial instruments as of December 31 follows:
 
2011
 
2010
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Cash and cash equivalentsa
$
4,822

 
$
4,822

 
$
3,738

 
$
3,738

MMR cost investmentb
475

 
507

 
500

 
623

Net embedded derivatives included in accounts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
receivable or payable
(10
)
 
(10
)
 
242

 
242

Trust assets (current and long-term)a, c
152

 
152

 
148

 
148

Available-for-sale securities (current and
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
long-term)a, c
11

 
11

 
34

 
34

Derivative assetsa, d
5

 
5

 
18

 
18

Derivative liabilitiesa, e
(13
)
 
(13
)
 
(10
)
 
(10
)
Debt (including amounts due within one year)f
(3,537
)
 
(3,797
)
 
(4,755
)
 
(5,146
)
a.
Recorded at fair value.
b.
Recorded at cost and included in other assets. At December 31, 2011, these securities were not actively trading; as such, fair value was based on a pricing simulation model using MMR's publicly traded common stock as the most significant observable input. At December 31, 2010, fair value was based on a bid evaluation, which is an estimated price at which a dealer would pay for a security.
c.
Current portion included in other current assets and long-term portion included in other assets.
d.
Included in other current assets.
e.
Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
f.
Recorded at cost except for long-term debt acquired in the FMC acquisition, which was recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. Fair value of substantially all of FCX’s long-term debt is estimated based on quoted market prices.