XML 85 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis
At December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
 
Assets
Quoted Prices In Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Balance at
December 31,
2012
Available-for-sale equity securities (1)
$
27,977

 
$
12,461

 
 
 
$
40,438

Available-for-sale debt securities (1)
$
8,026

 


 

 
$
8,026

Readily marketable inventory (2)
$
2,603

 
$
5,327

 

 
$
7,930

Derivative instruments (3)
$
96

 
$
2,257

 

 
$
2,353

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

Derivative instruments (3)
$
459

 
$
104

 
 
 
$
563


At December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
 
Assets
Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Balance at
December 31,
2011
Available-for-sale equity securities (1)
$
14,196

 
$
13,705

 
 
 
$
27,901

Available-for-sale debt securities (1)
$
15,205

 


 

 
$
15,205

Available-for-sale equity securities(1) - discontinued operations
$
7,945

 
$
5,832

 

 
$
13,777

Available-for-sale debt securities(1) - discontinued operations
$
21,393

 
 
 

 
$
21,393

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

Derivative instruments (3)


 
$
2,511

 

 
$
2,511


(1) Where there are quoted market prices that are readily available in an active market, securities are classified as Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 available-for-sale investments are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number of shares owned and debt securities are valued using a market quote in an active market. All Level 2 available-for-sale securities are one class because they all contain similar risks and are valued using market prices and include securities where the markets are not active, that is where there are few transactions, or the prices are not current or the prices vary considerably over time. Inputs include directly or indirectly observable inputs such as quoted prices. Level 3 available-for-sale securities would include securities where valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

(2) Readily marketable inventory are commodity inventories that are reported at fair value based on commodity exchange quotations. Canola seed inventories are valued based on the quoted market price multiplied by the quantity of inventory and are classified as Level 1. Canola oil and meal inventories are classified as Level 2 because the inputs are directly observable, such as the quoted market price of the corresponding soybean commodity.

(3) Included in this caption are three types of agricultural commodity derivative contracts: swaps, exchange traded futures, and forward commodity purchase and sale. The exchange traded futures contracts are valued based on quoted prices in active markets multiplied by the number of contracts and are classified as Level 1. The swaps are classified as Level 2 because the inputs are directly observable, such as the quoted market prices for relevant commodity futures contracts. The swaps are valued based on the difference of the arithmetic average of the quoted market price of the relevant underlying multiplied by the notional quantities, and the arithmetic average of the prices specified in the instrument multiplied by the notional quantities. Forward commodity purchase and sale contracts classified as derivatives are valued using quantitative models that require the use of multiple inputs including quoted market prices and various other assumptions including time value. These contracts are categorized as Level 2 and are valued based on the difference between the quoted market price and the price in the contract multiplied by the undelivered notional quantity deliverable under the contract.

Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis
The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31, 2011:
Asset Description
 
Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total
Loss
(1) Intangible asset (exclusive right to use infrastructure and associated water credits)
 
 
 
 
 
$
84,890

 
$
16,224

(2) Real estate and options to purchase real estate
 
 
 
 
 
$
579

 
$
5,180


(1)
As of December 31, 2011, the Company had a non-recurring fair value measurement for an intangible asset with a carrying amount of $101.1 million that was written down to its implied fair value of $84.9 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $16.2 million, which was included in earnings for December 31, 2011. The implied fair value was calculated using a discounted cash flow model that incorporated a wide range of assumptions including current asset pricing, price escalation, discount rates, absorption rates, and timing of sales, and costs. Given the dramatic and prolonged slow-down in housing starts and sales in the North Valleys of Reno, Nevada, and the decline in market prices for similar assets, the Company adjusted its assumptions and judgments in the model by reducing the price and lengthening the timing of absorption of water sales from the original projections.

(2) As of December 31, 2011, the Company had a non-recurring fair value measurement for real estate and real estate option contracts with a carrying amount of $5.7 million that was written down to its implied fair value of $579,000 resulting in an impairment charge of $5.2 million, which was included in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2011. The implied fair value was calculated using a discounted cash flow model that incorporated a wide range of assumptions including current asset pricing, and timing of sales, and costs. Given the facts and circumstances in certain of the real estate markets where the Company owns and develops real estate, including declines in market prices for similar assets, the Company adjusted its assumptions and judgments in its cash flow models by reducing prices, increasing costs and lengthening the timing of sales from the original projections.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated Fair
 Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated Fair
 Value
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
100,115

 
$
100,115

 
$
99,549

 
$
99,549

Notes and other receivables, net
$
10,487

 
$
10,487

 
$
6,669

 
$
6,669

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt
$
141,008

 
$
137,024

 
$
93,431

 
$
93,431

Schedule of Notional Amounts of Open Derivative Positions
The table below summarizes the notional amount of open derivative positions.
 
December 31, 2012
 
Exchange traded
 
Non-exchange traded
 
 
 
(Short)(1)
 
Long(1)
 
(Short)(1)
 
Long(1)
 
Unit of Measure
Futures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Agricultural Commodities
(14,242
)
 
26,132

 
 
 
 
 
Tons
Natural Gas
 
 
65,000

 
 
 
 
 
MMBtus
Forwards
 
 
 
 
(70,897
)
 
11,728

 
Tons
Swaps
 
 
 
 
 
 
19,500

 
Tons

(1) Exchange and non-exchange traded futures, forwards, and swaps are presented on a gross (short) and long position basis.
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income or Loss
The table below summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income or loss (in thousands).
 
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
 
 
 
December 31,
 
Location
 
2012
 
2011
Futures(1)
Cost of canola oil and meal sold
 
$
(3,469
)
 
 
Forwards(1)
Cost of canola oil and meal sold
 
$
1,637

 
 
Swaps(1)
Cost of canola oil and meal sold
 
$
3,933

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Futures(2)
Operating and other costs
 
$
(708
)
 
 
Forwards(2)
Operating and other costs
 
$
98

 
 
Swaps(2)
Operating and other costs
 
$
1,884

 
$
(2,511
)

(1) Represents the activity post-completion of the Company’s canola processing plant.

(2) Represents the activity pre-completion of the Company’s canola processing plant.