Legal and Other Proceedings	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Legal and Other Proceedings	15. LEGAL AND OTHER PROCEEDINGS As initially disclosed in 2011, we were served with a complaint, filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, by a bankruptcy trustee relating to a former WSFS Bank customer. The complaint challenges the Bank’s actions relating to the repayment of an outstanding loan and also seeks to avoid and recover the pre-bankruptcy repayment of that loan, approximately $5.0 million. The matter has been captioned Goldstein v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB (In re: Universal Marketing, Inc.), Chapter 7, Case No. 09-15404 (ELF), Adv. Pro. No. 11-00512. We believe we acted appropriately and we are vigorously defending ourselves against the complaint. Based upon available information we believe the estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses for this legal proceeding is from approximately $0 to approximately $5.0 million at March 31, 2015. Costs of litigation were initially covered by insurance; however, such costs have now exceeded the limits of insurance coverage for this case. Cross motions for summary judgment are currently pending before the court. On November 25, 2014, we were served with a complaint from a vendor seeking damages of $800,000 plus attorney’s fees, due to an alleged breach of contract. The parties agreed to mediate the dispute and during April of 2015, this issue was settled. The cost of the settlement was not material and was fully accrued for in our first quarter results. Three purported shareholder derivative and class action complaints relating to the pending merger with Alliance Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania have been filed. These actions, Parshall v. Stonier et al. (filed on April 20, 2015), Sloss v. Cirucci et al. (filed on May 4, 2015), and Hewes v. Cirucci et al. (filed on May 4, 2015) were all filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Pennsylvania. The complaints name as defendants Alliance Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania, its directors and certain of its officers, and the Company. The complaints in the merger litigation allege that the members of the board of directors of Alliance Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania breached their fiduciary duties to Alliance shareholders by approving the merger for inadequate consideration, approving the transaction in order to obtain benefits for Alliance directors and officers that are not equally shared by other Alliance shareholders, entering into the merger agreement containing preclusive deal protection devices, and failing to take steps to maximize the value to be paid to the Alliance shareholders. The complaints also allege claims against the Company for aiding and abetting these alleged breaches of fiduciary duties. Two of the complaints challenge the adequacy of the disclosures concerning the transaction in the registration statement on Form S-4 relating to the merger. The plaintiffs in these actions seek, among other things, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief prohibiting consummation of the merger, rescission or rescissory damages in the event the merger is consummated, damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and other and further relief. Each of the defendants believes the claims asserted in these actions are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. However, at this time, it is not possible to predict the outcome of the proceedings or their impact on the Company. There were no material changes or additions to other significant pending legal or other proceedings involving us other than those arising out of routine operations. Management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of such other proceedings will have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

15. LEGAL AND OTHER PROCEEDINGS

As initially disclosed in 2011, we were served with a complaint, filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, by a bankruptcy trustee relating to a former WSFS Bank customer. The complaint challenges the Bank’s actions relating to the repayment of an outstanding loan and also seeks to avoid and recover the pre-bankruptcy repayment of that loan, approximately $5.0 million. The matter has been captioned Goldstein v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB (In re: Universal Marketing, Inc.), Chapter 7, Case No. 09-15404 (ELF), Adv. Pro. No. 11-00512. We believe we acted appropriately and we are vigorously defending ourselves against the complaint.

Based upon available information we believe the estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses for this legal proceeding is from approximately $0 to approximately $5.0 million at March 31, 2015. Costs of litigation were initially covered by insurance; however, such costs have now exceeded the limits of insurance coverage for this case. Cross motions for summary judgment are currently pending before the court.

On November 25, 2014, we were served with a complaint from a vendor seeking damages of $800,000 plus attorney’s fees, due to an alleged breach of contract. The parties agreed to mediate the dispute and during April of 2015, this issue was settled. The cost of the settlement was not material and was fully accrued for in our first quarter results.

Three purported shareholder derivative and class action complaints relating to the pending merger with Alliance Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania have been filed. These actions, Parshall v. Stonier et al. (filed on April 20, 2015), Sloss v. Cirucci et al. (filed on May 4, 2015), and Hewes v. Cirucci et al. (filed on May 4, 2015) were all filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Pennsylvania. The complaints name as defendants Alliance Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania, its directors and certain of its officers, and the Company. The complaints in the merger litigation allege that the members of the board of directors of Alliance Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania breached their fiduciary duties to Alliance shareholders by approving the merger for inadequate consideration, approving the transaction in order to obtain benefits for Alliance directors and officers that are not equally shared by other Alliance shareholders, entering into the merger agreement containing preclusive deal protection devices, and failing to take steps to maximize the value to be paid to the Alliance shareholders. The complaints also allege claims against the Company for aiding and abetting these alleged breaches of fiduciary duties. Two of the complaints challenge the adequacy of the disclosures concerning the transaction in the registration statement on Form S-4 relating to the merger. The plaintiffs in these actions seek, among other things, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief prohibiting consummation of the merger, rescission or rescissory damages in the event the merger is consummated, damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and other and further relief. Each of the defendants believes the claims asserted in these actions are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against this lawsuit. However, at this time, it is not possible to predict the outcome of the proceedings or their impact on the Company.

There were no material changes or additions to other significant pending legal or other proceedings involving us other than those arising out of routine operations. Management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of such other proceedings will have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.