XML 73 R32.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
Recurring Fair Value Measurements:
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements fall, are as follows (in thousands):
 
Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for
Identical Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2012
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in grantor trusts
$
16,030

 
 
 
 
 
$
16,030

Derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
 
$
9,926

 
 
 
9,926

Total
$
16,030

 
$
9,926

 
$

 
$
25,956

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
 
$
768

 
 
 
$
768

Deferred compensation plan obligations
$
16,030

 
 
 
 
 
16,030

Total
$
16,030

 
$
768

 
$

 
$
16,798

 
Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for
Identical Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other
Observable  Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2011
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments in grantor trusts
$
14,693

 
 
 
 
 
$
14,693

Derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
 
10,816

 
 
 
10,816

Total
$
14,693

 
$
10,816

 
$

 
$
25,509

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
 
 
$
674

 
 
 
$
674

Deferred compensation plan obligations
$
14,693

 
 
 
 
 
14,693

Total
$
14,693

 
$
674

 
$

 
$
15,367


A reconciliation of the outstanding balance of the subordinate tax increment revenue bonds using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows (in thousands):
 
Fair Value 
Measurements 
Using
Significant 
Unobservable 
Inputs
(Level 3)
Outstanding, January 1, 2011
$
10,700

Settlement of recalled bonds (1)
(10,700
)
Outstanding, December 31, 2011
$

 
 
(1)
Settlement of recalled bonds represents the recall of previously issued subordinated tax increment revenue bonds that were available for sale and were replaced with held to maturity subordinated tax increment revenue bonds associated with the exchange transaction in April 2011.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements:
Property and Property Held for Sale Impairments
Property is reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property, including any identifiable intangible assets, site costs and capitalized interest, may not be recoverable. In such an event, a comparison is made of the current and projected operating cash flows of each such property into the foreseeable future on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. If we conclude that an impairment may have occurred, estimated fair values are determined by management utilizing cash flow models, market capitalization rates and market discount rates, or by obtaining third-party broker valuation estimates, appraisals, bona fide purchase offers or the expected sales price of an executed sales agreement in accordance with our fair value measurements accounting policy. Market capitalization rates and market discount rates are determined by reviewing current sales of similar properties and transactions, and utilizing management’s knowledge and expertise in property marketing.
Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures and Partnerships Impairments
The fair value of our investment in partially owned real estate joint ventures and partnerships is estimated by management based on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment, the life and other terms of the investment, holding periods, market conditions, cash flow models, market capitalization rates and market discount rates, or by obtaining third-party broker valuation estimates, appraisals and bona fide purchase offers in accordance with our fair value measurements accounting policy. Market capitalization rates and market discount rates are determined by reviewing current sales of similar properties and transactions, and utilizing management’s knowledge and expertise in property marketing. We recognize an impairment loss if we determine the fair value of an investment is less than its carrying amount and that loss in value is other than temporary.
Subordinate Tax Increment Revenue Bonds Impairment
Investments in tax increment revenue bonds are reviewed for impairment if changes in circumstances or forecasts indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable and if it is uncertain if the investment will be held to maturity. In such an event, a comparison is made of the projected recoverability of cash flows from the tax increment revenue bonds to the carrying amount of each investment. If we conclude that an impairment may have occurred, fair values are determined by management utilizing third-party sales revenue projections until the maturity of the bonds and discounted cash flow models.
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2012 aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements fall, are as follows (in thousands):
 
Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for
Identical 
Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other
Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value
 
Total Gains
(Losses) (1)
Property (2)
 
 
$
5,773

 
$
13,906

 
$
19,679

 
$
(2,971
)
Investment in real estate joint ventures
and partnerships (3)
 
 
24,231

 
 
 
24,231

 
(6,608
)
Total
$

 
$
30,004

 
$
13,906

 
$
43,910

 
$
(9,579
)

 
(1)
Total gains (losses) exclude impairments on disposed assets because they are no longer held by us.
(2)
In accordance with our policy of evaluating and recording impairments on the disposal of long-lived assets, property with a carrying amount of $22.4 million was written down to a fair value of $19.7 million less costs to sell of $.3 million, resulting in a loss of $3.0 million, which was included in earnings for the period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these properties was determined using bona fide purchase offer for the Level 2 inputs. See the quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for our Level 3 fair value measurements table below.
(3)
Our net investment in real estate joint ventures and partnerships with a carrying amount of $30.8 million was written down to a fair value of $24.2 million, resulting in a loss of $6.6 million, which was included in earnings for the period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of this investment was determined using the weighted average of the bona fide purchase offers received for the Level 2 inputs.
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2011, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements fall, are as follows (in thousands):
 
Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for
Identical 
Assets
and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant 
Other
Observable 
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Fair Value
 
Total Gains
(Losses) (1)
Property (2)
 
 
$
389

 
$
98,207

 
$
98,596

 
$
(36,907
)
Property held for sale (3)
 
 
43,657

 
1,500

 
45,157

 
(13,799
)
Investment in real estate joint ventures
and partnerships (4)
 
 
 
 
6,311

 
6,311

 
(1,752
)
Subordinate tax increment revenue bonds (5)
 
 
 
 
26,723

 
26,723

 
(18,737
)
Total
$

 
$
44,046

 
$
132,741

 
$
176,787

 
$
(71,195
)
 
 
(1)
Total gains (losses) are reflected throughout 2011 and exclude impairments on disposed assets because they are no longer held by us.
(2)
In accordance with our policy of evaluating and recording impairments on the disposal of long-lived assets, property with a carrying amount of $135.5 million was written down to a fair value of $98.6 million, resulting in a loss of $36.9 million, which was included in earnings for the period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these properties was determined using the expected sales price of an executed agreement for the Level 2 input and using third party broker valuations, bona fide purchase offers, cash flow models and discount rates ranging from 8% to 13% for the Level 3 inputs.
(3)
Property held for sale with a carrying amount of $57.0 million was written down to a fair value of $45.2 million less costs to sell of $2.0 million, resulting in a loss of $13.8 million, which was included in discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these properties was determined using the expected sales price of executed agreements for the Level 2 inputs and a cash flow model using a discount rate of 10% for the Level 3 input.
(4)
Our net investment in real estate joint ventures and partnerships with a carrying amount of $8.1 million was written down to a fair value of $6.3 million, resulting in a loss of $1.8 million, which was included in earnings for the period. Management’s estimate of the fair value of these investments was determined using the life and other terms of the investment, our partner’s financial condition, cash flow models and market capitalization rates ranging from 7% to 9% for the Level 3 inputs.
(5)
A net credit loss on the exchange of bonds of $18.7 million was recognized upon the recall and replacement of our investment in tax increment revenue bonds by the Agency in April 2011. The exchange transaction resulted in us receiving approximately $16.5 million in cash proceeds and $57.7 million in new subordinated bonds replacing the face value of our $51.3 million of senior bonds and $22.4 million of subordinate bonds, which had been previously written down to a fair value of $10.7 million. The carrying value of the $57.7 million subordinated bonds received in the exchange were written down to their fair value of $26.7 million, of which a loss of $11.7 million was previously recognized in December 2010. The net credit loss resulted as management did not expect to recover the par value of the bonds based upon changes in terms of the bonds and future sales tax revenue projections of the development project through their maturity. Management’s estimates of the fair value of these investments were determined using third-party sales revenue projections, future growth rates ranging from 1% to 4% and inflation rates ranging from 1% to 2% for the Level 3 inputs.
Fair Value Disclosures:
Unless otherwise listed below, short-term financial instruments and receivables are carried at amounts which approximate their fair values based on their highly-liquid nature, short-term maturities and/or expected interest rates for similar instruments.
Schedule of our fair value disclosures is as follows (in thousands):
 
December 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
Using
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
Using
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Notes receivable from real estate joint ventures
and partnerships
$
89,776

 
$
93,572

 
$
149,204

 
$
153,532

Tax increment revenue bonds
26,505

 
26,505

 
26,505

 
26,505

Debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed-rate debt
1,992,599

 
2,094,122

 
2,014,834

 
2,054,670

Variable-rate debt
211,431

 
223,759

 
517,003

 
531,353


A reconciliation of the credit loss recognized on our subordinated tax increment revenue bonds at December 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):
 
Credit Loss Recognized
Beginning balance, January 1, 2011
$
11,717

Additions
19,305

Ending balance, December 31, 2011
$
31,022

Additions

Ending balance, December 31, 2012
$
31,022


The quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for our Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2012 reported in the above tables, is as follows:
Description
 
Fair Value at
December 31,
2012
 
Valuation Technique
 
Unobservable Inputs
 
Range
 
 
 
 
Minimum
 
Maximum
Property
 
$
13,906

 
Broker valuation estimate
 
Indicative bid (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bona fide purchase offers
 
Contract price (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rate
 
 
 
10.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capitalization rate
 
9.3
%
 
9.5
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Holding period (years)
 
 
 
1

 
 
 
 
 
 
Expected future inflation rate (2)
 
 
 
3.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market rent growth rate (2)
 
 
 
3.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expense growth rate (2)
 
 
 
3.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vacancy rate (2)
 
 
 
5.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Renewal rate (2)
 
 
 
75.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average market rent rate (2)
 
 
 
$
10.52

 
 
 
 
 
 
Average leasing cost per
square foot (2)
 
 
 
$
16.50

Notes receivable from real
estate joint ventures and
partnerships
 
93,572

 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rate
 
 
 
3.0
%
Tax increment revenue bonds
 
26,505

 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rate
 
 
 
7.5
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expected future growth rate
 
1.0
%
 
4.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expected future inflation rate
 
1.0
%
 
2.0
%
Fixed-rate debt
 
2,094,122

 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rate
 
1.1
%
 
6.5
%
Variable-rate debt
 
223,759

 
Discounted cash flows
 
Discount rate
 
1.4
%
 
5.0
%
_______________
(1)
These fair values were developed by third parties, subject to our corroboration for reasonableness.
(2)
Only applies to one property valuation.