10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 1-14771

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Massachusetts	04-2962824
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

16 New England Executive Park, Suite 200, Burlington, MA 01803

(Address of principal executive offices)

(781) 994-4800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

As of July 31, 2012, 14,313,852 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Part I- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited):
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011		3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income - Three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity Six months ended June  30, 2012, and the twelve months ended December 31, 2011		5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011		6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		26
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		26
Part II- OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		27
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		27
Item 6.	Exhibits		27
Signatures			29

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,235		$	2,452
Restricted cash		296			382
Net investment in leases:
Receivables due in installments		208,057			200,499
Estimated residual value		23,844			23,287
Initial direct costs		1,682			1,476
Less:
Advance lease payments and deposits		(3,388	)		(3,530	)
Unearned income		(61,838	)		(59,946	)
Allowance for credit losses		(13,030	)		(13,180	)
Net investment in leases		155,327			148,606
Investment in service contracts, net		120			—
Investment in rental contracts, net		1,046			898
Property and equipment, net		1,730			1,911
Other assets		2,373			1,093
Total assets	$	163,127		$	155,342
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Revolving line of credit	$	68,538		$	62,740
Accounts payable		2,984			2,546
Capital lease obligation		—			1
Dividends payable		28			19
Other liabilities		2,757			2,220
Income taxes payable		—			760
Deferred income taxes		9,869			11,333
Total liabilities		84,176			79,619
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 14,297,524 and 14,257,324 shares issued at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		143			143
Additional paid-in capital		47,031			46,727
Retained earnings		31,777			28,853
Total stockholders’ equity		78,951			75,723
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	163,127		$	155,342

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Revenues:
Income on financing leases	$	9,920	$	9,136	$	19,555	$	18,237
Rental income		2,402		2,073		4,719		4,079
Income on service contracts		85		103		170		211
Loss and damage waiver fees		1,321		1,220		2,608		2,421
Service fees and other		967		931		1,887		1,863
Total revenues		14,695		13,463		28,939		26,811
Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		4,025		4,037		8,381		7,990
Provision for credit losses		4,548		4,251		9,444		9,003
Depreciation and amortization		1,065		783		2,073		1,464
Interest		655		680		1,288		1,343
Total expenses		10,293		9,751		21,186		19,800
Income before provision for income taxes		4,402		3,712		7,753		7,011
Provision for income taxes		1,761		1,429		3,101		2,699
Net income	$	2,641	$	2,283	$	4,652	$	4,312
Net income per common share – basic	$	0.18	$	0.16	$	0.33	$	0.30
Net income per common share – diluted	$	0.18	$	0.16	$	0.32	$	0.30
Weighted-average shares:
Basic		14,297,524		14,231,692		14,290,806		14,239,180
Diluted		14,658,235		14,503,702		14,635,068		14,495,745

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Common Stock					Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares			Amount
Balance at December 31, 2010		14,231,933		$	142	$	46,475		$	22,870		$	69,487
Stock issued for deferred compensation		77,274			1		353			—			354
Stock-based compensation		—			—		138			—			138
Stock repurchase program		(51,883	)		—		(239	)		—			(239	)
Common stock dividends ($0.21 per share)		—			—		—			(3,008	)		(3,008	)
Net income		—			—		—			8,991			8,991
Balance at December 31, 2011		14,257,324			143		46,727			28,853			75,723
Stock issued for deferred compensation		31,820			—		210			—			210
Stock-based compensation		—			—		94			—			94
Shares issued upon vesting of restricted stock units		8,380			—		—			—			—
Common stock dividends ($0.12 per share)		—			—		—			(1,728	)		(1,728	)
Net income		—			—		—			4,652			4,652
Balance at June 30, 2012		14,297,524		$	143	$	47,031		$	31,777		$	78,951

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash received from customers	$	59,232		$	52,469
Cash paid to suppliers and employees		(10,118	)		(9,240	)
Cash paid for income taxes		(6,647	)		(238	)
Interest paid		(1,133	)		(1,229	)
Interest received		—			1
Net cash provided by operating activities		41,334			41,763
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in lease, service and rental contracts		(44,761	)		(36,635	)
Investment in direct costs		(831	)		(498	)
Investment in property and equipment		(123	)		(734	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(45,715	)		(37,867	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from secured debt		65,633			48,729
Repayment of secured debt		(59,835	)		(51,805	)
Payment of debt closing costs		—			(2	)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash		86			(226	)
Repayment of capital lease obligation		(1	)		(20	)
Repurchase of common stock		—			(240	)
Payment of dividends		(1,719	)		(1,426	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		4,164			(4,990	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(217	)		(1,094	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		2,452			1,528
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	2,235		$	434
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income	$	4,652		$	4,312
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of unearned income, net of initial direct costs		(19,555	)		(18,237	)
Depreciation and amortization		2,073			1,464
Provision for credit losses		9,444			9,003
Recovery of equipment cost and residual value		46,945			40,715
Stock-based compensation expense		94			68
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable		(760	)		137
Increase (decrease) in deferred income taxes		(1,464	)		1,991
Decrease (increase) in other assets		(1,280	)		311
Increase in accounts payable		648			289
Increase in other liabilities		537			1,710
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	41,334		$	41,763
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment through lease incentives	$	—		$	791
Fair market value of stock issued for compensation	$	210		$	212

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)

A. Nature of Business

MicroFinancial Incorporated (referred to as “MicroFinancial,” “we,” “us” or “our”) operates primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, TimePayment Corp. and LeaseComm Corporation. TimePayment is a specialized commercial finance company that leases and rents “microticket” equipment and provides other financing services. LeaseComm started originating leases in January 1986 and in October 2002 suspended virtually all originations due to an interruption in financing. TimePayment commenced originating leases in July 2004. The average amount financed by TimePayment during 2011 was approximately $5,900 compared to the 2012 year to date average of $5,500. LeaseComm historically financed contracts of approximately $1,900. We primarily source our originations through a nationwide network of independent equipment vendors, sales organizations and other dealer-based origination networks. We fund our operations through cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under our revolving line of credit.

B. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements. Accordingly, our interim statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required for our annual financial statements. In the opinion of our management, the condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim results. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The results for the six months ended June 30, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2012.

The balance sheet at December 31, 2011, has been derived from the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Segment Reporting

We operate in one industry segment that leases and rents “microticket” equipment and provides other financing services. All of our operations are located in the United States. Accordingly, we believe we have a single reportable segment for disclosure purposes.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality of Loans

We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against losses in our portfolio. Given the nature of the “microticket” market and the individual size of each transaction, we do not have a formal credit review committee to review individual transactions. Rather, we developed a sophisticated, multi-tiered pricing model and have automated the credit scoring, approval and collection processes. We believe that with the proper pricing model, we can grant credit to a wide range of applicants provided we have priced appropriately for the associated risk. As a result of approving a wide range of credits, we experience a relatively high level of delinquency and write-offs in our portfolio. We periodically review the credit scoring and approval process to ensure that the automated system is making appropriate credit decisions. Given the nature of the “microticket” market and the individual size of each transaction, we do not evaluate transactions individually for the purpose of developing and determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Contracts in our portfolio are not re-graded subsequent to the initial extension of credit and the allowance is not allocated to specific contracts. Rather, we view the contracts as having common characteristics and maintain a general allowance against our entire portfolio utilizing historical collection statistics and an assessment of current credit risk in the portfolio as the basis for the amount.

We have adopted a consistent, systematic procedure for establishing and maintaining an appropriate allowance for credit losses for our microticket transactions. We estimate the likelihood of credit losses net of recoveries in the

7

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)

portfolio at each reporting period based upon a combination of the lessee’s bureau reported credit score at lease inception and the current delinquency status of the account. In addition to these elements, we also consider other relevant factors including general economic trends, trends in delinquencies and credit losses, static pool analysis of our portfolio, trends in recoveries made on charged off accounts, and other relevant factors which might affect the performance of our portfolio. This combination of historical experience, credit scores, delinquency levels, trends in credit losses, and the review of current factors provide the basis for our analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. In general a receivable is uncollectable when it is 360 days past due or earlier, if other adverse events occur with respect to an account. None of our receivables are placed on non-accrual status as accounts are charged off when deemed uncollectible. Historically, the typical monthly payment under our microticket leases has been small and as a result, our experience is that lessees will pay past due amounts later in the process because of the relatively small amount necessary to bring an account current.

We segregate our lease portfolio between TimePayment Corp. and Leasecomm Corp. to perform the calculation and analysis of the allowance for loan losses. Each company consists of a single portfolio segment – microticket equipment. Leases of microticket equipment are made to businesses and individuals and are generally secured by assets of the business or a personal guarantee. Repayment is expected from the cash flows of the business or individual. A weakened economy, and resultant decreased consumer spending, may have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.

Each period the provision for credit losses in the income statement results from the combination of an estimate by management of credit losses that occurred during the current period and the ongoing adjustment of prior estimates of losses occurring in prior periods. To serve as a basis for making this provision, we maintain an internally developed proprietary scoring model that considers several factors including the lessee’s bureau reported credit score at lease inception. We also consider other relevant factors including general economic trends, trends in delinquencies and credit losses, static pool analysis of our portfolio, trends in recoveries made on charged off accounts, and other relevant factors which might affect the performance of our portfolio. The combination of historical experience, credit scores, delinquency levels, trends in credit losses, and the review of current factors provide the basis for our analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses.

We assign internal risk ratings for all lessees and determine the credit worthiness of each lease based upon this internally developed proprietary scoring model. The LeaseComm portfolio is evaluated in total with a reserve of 50% of the outstanding amount greater than 90 days plus 25% of the amount outstanding from 1 to 89 days. The TimePayment scoring model generates one of nine acceptable risk ratings based upon the credit worthiness of each lease or it rejects the lease application. The scores are assigned at lease inception and these scores are maintained over the lease term regardless of payment performance. To facilitate review and reporting, management aggregates these nine scores into one of three categories with similar risk profiles and delinquency characteristics identified as Gold, Silver or Bronze.

• Leases assigned a gold rating represent those transactions which exhibit the best risk rating based on our internal credit scores. They are considered of sufficient quality to preclude an otherwise adverse rating. Gold rated leases are typically represented by lessees with high bureau reported credit scores for personal guarantors at lease inception or are supported by established businesses for those transactions which are not personally guaranteed by the lessee.

• Leases assigned a silver rating fall in the middle range of the nine acceptable scores generated by the scoring model. These transactions possess a reasonable amount of risk based on their profile and may exhibit vulnerability to deterioration if adverse factors are encountered. These accounts typically demonstrate adequate coverage but warrant a higher level of monitoring by management to ensure that weaknesses do not advance.

• A bronze rating applies to leases at the lower end of the nine acceptable scores generated by the scoring model whereby the lessee may have difficulty meeting the lease obligation if adverse factors are encountered. Bronze rated transactions typically have lower reported credit scores at lease inception and will typically have other less desirable credit attributes.

8

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)

See Note C for details of our allowance for credit losses and the aged analysis of past due financing receivables based upon our internally-developed proprietary lease scoring model.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Accounting for fair value measurements involves a single definition of fair value, along with a conceptual framework to measure fair value, with fair value defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an order transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” The fair value measurement hierarchy consists of three levels:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumption which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

We apply valuation techniques that (1) place greater reliance on observable inputs and less reliance on unobservable inputs and (2) are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, other assets, accounts payable and other liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments, valued using Level 3 inputs, as described above. The fair value of the amounts outstanding under our revolving line of credit, evaluated using Level 2 inputs as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, approximate the carrying value. We have elected not to mark the amount outstanding under this facility to market.

Stock-based Employee Compensation

We have adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires us to recognize the compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions with employees in the financial statements. The compensation cost is measured based upon the fair value of the instrument issued. Share-based compensation transactions with employees covered by FASB ASC Topic 718 include share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.

Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net income per share does not assume the issuance of common shares that have an antidilutive effect on net income per common share.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid instruments purchased with original maturities of less than three months to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

9

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)

Concentration of Credit Risk

We deposit our cash and invest in short-term investments primarily through national commercial banks. Deposits in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) are exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance by the institution. The Company has had cash deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance coverage.

C. Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality

The following table reconciles the activity in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Microticket equipment
	2012									2011
	LeaseComm			TimePayment			Total			LeaseComm			TimePayment			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	162		$	13,018		$	13,180		$	231		$	12,901		$	13,132
Charge-Offs		(332	)		(11,888	)		(12,220	)		(394	)		(11,339	)		(11,733	)
Recoveries		136			2,490			2,626			641			1,852			2,493
Provisions		160			9,284			9,444			(290	)		9,293			9,003
Ending balance, allowance for credit losses	$	126		$	12,904		$	13,030		$	188		$	12,707		$	12,895
Allowance for credit losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Collectively evaluated for impairment		126			12,904			13,030			188			12,707			12,895
Contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—			—			—			—			—			—
Ending balance, allowance for credit losses:	$	126		$	12,904		$	13,030		$	188		$	12,707		$	12,895
Financing Receivables (1):
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Collectively evaluated for impairment		288			168,069			168,357			415			154,383			154,798
Contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—			—			—			—			—			—
Ending balance, financing receivables	$	288		$	168,069		$	168,357		$	415		$	154,383		$	154,798

(1) Total financing receivables include net investment in leases. For purposes of asset quality and allowance calculations, the allowance for credit losses is excluded.

10

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)

The following table presents the aging status of the recorded investment in leases by our internally-developed proprietary scoring model as of June 30, 2012:

	Current			31 to 60 days Past Due			61 to 90 days Past Due			Over 90 Days Past Due			Total			Over 90 Days Accruing
LeaseComm	$	139		$	6		$	6		$	137		$	288		$	137
TimePayment Corp.
Gold		52,912			2,061			951			1,980			57,904			1,980
Silver		84,260			2,288			2,363			12,505			101,416			12,505
Bronze		6,315			354			320			1,760			8,749			1,760
TimePayment Corp. subtotal		143,487			4,703			3,634			16,245			168,069			16,245
Total financing receivables	$	143,626		$	4,709		$	3,640		$	16,382		$	168,357		$	16,382
Percent of total financing receivables		85.3	%		2.8	%		2.2	%		9.7	%		100	%

The following table presents the aging status of the recorded investment in leases by our internally-developed proprietary scoring model as of June 30, 2011:

	Current			31 to 60 days Past Due			61 to 90 days Past Due			Over 90 Days Past Due			Total			Over 90 Days Accruing
LeaseComm	$	183		$	11		$	8		$	213		$	415		$	213
TimePayment Corp.
Gold		45,456			1,372			540			1,713			49,081			1,713
Silver		79,753			2,762			2,488			13,351			98,354			13,351
Bronze		4,485			261			294			1,908			6,948			1,908
TimePayment Corp. subtotal		129,694			4,395			3,322			16,972			154,383			16,972
Total financing receivables	$	129,877		$	4,406		$	3,330		$	17,185		$	154,798		$	17,185
Percent of total financing receivables		83.9	%		2.8	%		2.2	%		11.1	%		100	%

11

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)

D. Net Income Per Share

For the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, 0 and 409,305 options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because their effect would have been antidilutive. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, 0 and 434,167 options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because their effect would have been antidilutive.

Net income per share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Net income	$	2,641	$	2,283	$	4,652	$	4,312
Weighted average common shares outstanding		14,297,524		14,231,692		14,290,806		14,239,180
Dilutive effect of common stock options, warrants and restricted stock		360,711		272,010		344,262		256,565
Shares used in computation of net income per common share - diluted		14,658,235		14,503,702		14,635,068		14,495,745
Net income per common share - basic	$	0.18	$	0.16	$	0.33	$	0.30
Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.18	$	0.16	$	0.32	$	0.30

E. Dividends

Dividends declared and paid on a per share basis were as follows:

	2012
	Date Declared	Record Date	Payment Date	Dividend per Share
	January 31, 2012	February 10, 2012	February 15, 2012	$	0.06
	April 19, 2012	April 30, 2012	May 15, 2012		0.06
Total				$	0.12
	2011
	Date Declared	Record Date	Payment Date	Dividend per Share
	January 21, 2011	February 1, 2011	February 15, 2011	$	0.05
	April 21, 2011	May 2, 2011	May 13, 2011		0.05
Total				$	0.10

12

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)

F. Revolving line of credit

On August 2, 2007, we entered into a revolving line of credit with a bank syndicate led by Sovereign Bank (“Sovereign”) based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables. The total commitment under the facility was originally $30 million, and was subsequently increased to $60 million in July 2008, to $85 million in February 2009, and most recently to $100 million in July 2010. Outstanding borrowings are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security interest in all of our other assets.

In October 2011, the interest rate was lowered from Prime plus 1.25% or a London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 3.25% to Prime plus 0.75% or LIBOR plus 2.75%. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans, unless we elect LIBOR Loans. If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically converts to a Prime Rate Loan. As a part of the October 2011 amendment, the maturity date of the facility was extended to August 2, 2014. At our option upon maturity, the unpaid principal balance may be converted to a six-month term loan.

At June 30, 2012, $57.0 million of our loans were LIBOR loans and $11.5 million of our loans were Prime Rate Loans. The interest rate on our loans at June 30, 2012, was between 3.1% and 4.0%. The amount available on our revolving line of credit at June 30, 2012, was $31.5 million. The revolving line of credit has financial covenants that we must comply with to obtain funding and avoid an event of default. As of June 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants under the revolving line of credit.

G. Stock-Based Employee Compensation

Under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, we reserved 1,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance, of which 61,251 shares are unissued as of June 30, 2012. In May 2012, our stockholders approved our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, for which we have 750,000 shares of common stock reserved and unissued as of June 30, 2012. The total potential future grants under the combined 2008 and 2012 plans are 811,251 shares.

In February 2012, the Compensation and Benefits Committee of our Board of Directors granted 40,393 restricted stock units to our executive officers under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. The restricted stock units were valued on the date of grant and the fair value of these awards was $6.60 per share. The issuance consists of two separate tranches where 25,165 shares of the restricted stock units vest over five years at 25% annually beginning on the second anniversary of the grant date and 15,228 shares of the restricted stock cliff vest after three years only if management achieves specific performance measures.

In February 2012, we granted our non-employee directors a total of 31,820 shares of stock with immediate vesting at a fair value of $6.60 per share, for a total grant date fair value of $210,000, in accordance with our director compensation policy.

The following table summarizes stock and restricted stock unit grant and vesting activity during the six months ended June 30, 2012:

	Stock Awards			Restricted Stock Units
	Number of Shares
Non-vested at December 31, 2011		—			66,562
Granted		31,820			40,393
Vested		(31,820	)		(8,380	)
Non-vested at June 30, 2012		—			98,575

During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012, compensation expense related to the restricted stock units was $29,000 and $52,000, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, compensation expense related to the restricted stock units was $12,000 and $22,000, respectively.

13

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)

The following summarizes stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012:

	Shares			Price Per Share	Weighted- Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2011		818,028		$1.585 to $6.700	$	4.19
Granted		0		$0.000	$	0.00
Expired		(235,000	)	$6.700	$	6.70
Forfeited		0		$0.000	$	0.00
Outstanding at June 30, 2012		583,028		$1.585 to $5.850	$	3.17

Information relating to our outstanding stock options at June 30, 2012, is as follows:

Outstanding								Exercisable
Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted- Average Life (Years)		Intrinsic Value		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Shares		Intrinsic Value
	$1.585		150,000		0.41	$	977	$	1.585		150,000	$	977
	2.300		258,723		6.67		1,501		2.300		129,362		750
	5.770		31,923		4.67		74		5.770		31,923		74
	5.850		142,382		5.58		320		5.850		106,787		240
			583,028		4.68	$	2,872		3.220		418,072	$	2,041

We recognized total share-based compensation cost of $49,000 and $33,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the total share-based compensation cost recognized was $94,000 and $68,000, respectively.

H. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. Although we do not expect that the outcome of any of these matters, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, litigation is inherently unpredictable. Therefore, judgments could be rendered, or settlements entered, that could adversely affect our operating results or cash flows in a particular period. We routinely assess all of our litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately incurring a liability, and record our best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where we access the likelihood of loss as probable.

Lease Commitments

We accept lease applications on a daily basis and, as a result, we have a pipeline of applications that have been approved, where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to lend does not become binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been completed, including the receipt of the lease, supporting documentation and verification with the lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is verified, we do not have any outstanding commitments to lend.

14

MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)

Stock Repurchases

On August 10, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program under which we are authorized to purchase up to 250,000 of our outstanding shares from time to time. The repurchases may take place in either the open market or through block trades. The repurchase program will be funded by our working capital and may be suspended or discontinued at anytime.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock under our stock buyback program. Since the program’s inception, we have repurchased a total of 86,295 shares of our common stock at a total cost of approximately $378,000.

I. Subsequent Events

We have evaluated all events or transactions that occurred through the date on which we issued these financial statements. Other than the declaration of dividends we did not have any material subsequent events that impacted our consolidated financial statements.

On July 19, 2012, we declared a dividend of $0.06 payable on August 15, 2012, to shareholders of record on July 30, 2012.

15

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction

The following information should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Forward-Looking Information

Statements in this document that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, words such as “believes” “anticipates” “expects,” intends and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Such statements contain a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those associated with: the demand for the equipment types we finance; our significant capital requirements; our inability to obtain the financing we need, or to use internally generated funds, in order to continue originating contracts; the risks of defaults on our leases; our provision for credit losses; our residual interests in underlying equipment; possible adverse consequences associated with our collection policy; the effect of higher interest rates on our portfolio; increasing competition; increased governmental regulation of the rates and methods we use in financing and collecting on our leases and contracts; acquiring other portfolios or companies; dependence on key personnel; changes to accounting standards for equipment leases; adverse results in litigation and regulatory matters, or promulgation of new or enhanced legislation or regulations; information technology systems disruptions; and general economic and business conditions. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our view only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. We cannot assure that we will be able to anticipate or respond timely to changes which could adversely affect our operating results. Results of operations in any past period should not be considered indicative of results to be expected in future periods. Fluctuations in operating results may result in fluctuations in the price of our common stock. Statements relating to past dividend payments or our current dividend policy should not be construed as a guarantee that any future dividends will be paid. For a more complete description of the prominent risks and uncertainties inherent in our business, see the risk factors included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Overview

We are a specialized commercial finance company that provides “microticket” equipment leasing and other financing services. The average amount financed by TimePayment during 2011 was approximately $5,900 compared to the 2012 year to date average of $5,500. LeaseComm historically financed contracts of approximately $1,900. Our existing portfolio consists of business equipment leased or rented primarily to small commercial enterprises.

We finance the origination of our leases and contracts primarily through cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under our revolving line of credit. On August 2, 2007, we entered into a revolving line of credit with a bank syndicate led by Sovereign Bank (“Sovereign”) based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables. The commitment under this facility has been increased at various times, most recently in July 2010, to $100 million. Outstanding borrowings are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security interest in all of our other assets. As a part of the July 2010 amendment, the interest rate was lowered to Prime plus 1.25% or LIBOR plus 3.25%. In October 2011, credit facility was amended to reduce the rate to Prime plus 0.75% or LIBOR plus 2.75%, and extend the maturity date of the facility to August 2, 2014. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans, unless we elect LIBOR Loans. If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically converts to a Prime Rate Loan. At our option upon maturity, the unpaid principal balance may be converted to a six-month term loan.

In a typical lease transaction, we originate a lease through our nationwide network of equipment vendors, independent sales organizations and brokers. Upon our approval of a lease application and verification that the lessee has received the equipment and signed the lease, we pay the dealer for the cost of the equipment, plus the dealer’s profit margin.

16

Substantially all leases originated or acquired by us are non-cancelable. During the term of the lease, we are scheduled to receive payments sufficient to cover our borrowing costs and the cost of the underlying equipment and provide us with an appropriate profit. We pass along some of the costs of our leases and contracts by charging late fees, prepayment penalties, loss and damage waiver fees and other service fees, when applicable. Collection fees are imposed based on our estimate of the costs of collection. The loss and damage waiver fees are charged if a customer fails to provide proof of insurance and are reasonably related to the cost of replacing the lost or damaged equipment or product. The initial non-cancelable term of the lease is equal to or less than the equipment’s estimated economic life and often provides us with additional revenues based on the residual value of the equipment at the end of the lease. Initial terms of the leases in our portfolio generally range from 12 to 60 months, with an average initial term of 44 months as of December 31, 2011.

Operating Data

Dealer funding was $23.9 million and $45.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively; compared to $18.7 million and $37.1 million for the comparable periods in 2011. We continue to concentrate on our business development efforts, which include increasing the size of our vendor base and sourcing a larger number of applications from those vendors. Receivables due in installments, estimated residual values, net investment in service contracts and investment in rental contracts increased from $226.8 million at December 31, 2011, to $229.2 million at March 31, 2012, to $235.2 million at June 30, 2012. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $2.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, and by $0.4 million during the first six months of 2012 as compared to the equivalent period in 2011.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note B to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report and in Note B to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain accounting policies are particularly important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial position and results of operations. These policies require the application of significant judgment by us and as a result, are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, we make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosures. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, terms of existing contracts, observance of trends in the industry, information obtained from dealers and other sources, and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Our critical accounting policies, including revenue recognition, maintaining the allowance for credit losses, determining provisions for income taxes, and accounting for share-based compensation are each discussed in more detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have reviewed those policies and determined that they remain our critical accounting policies and that we did not make any changes in those policies during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

17

Results of Operations - Three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011

Revenue

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012		Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Income on financing leases	$	9,920		8.6	%	$	9,136
Rental income		2,402		15.9			2,073
Income on service contracts		85		(17.5	)		103
Loss and damage waiver fees		1,321		8.3			1,220
Service fees and other income		967		3.9			931
Total revenues	$	14,695		9.2	%	$	13,463

Our lease contracts are accounted for as financing leases. At origination, we record the gross lease receivable, the estimated residual value of the leased equipment, initial direct costs incurred and the unearned lease income. Unearned lease income is the amount by which the gross lease receivable plus the estimated residual value exceeds the cost of the equipment. Unearned lease income and initial direct costs incurred are amortized over the related lease term using the interest method. Other revenues such as loss and damage waiver fees, service fees relating to the leases and contracts, and rental revenues are recognized as they are earned.

Total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012, were $14.7 million, an increase of $1.2 million, or 9.2%, from the three months ended June 30, 2011. The overall increase was due to an increase of $0.8 million in income on financing leases, an increase of $0.3 million in rental income and an increase of $0.1 million in revenue from loss and damage fee waivers. The increase in income on financing leases is a result of the continued growth in new lease originations. The increase in loss and damage waiver fees is related to an increase in the number of leases subject to such fees as the overall lease portfolio grows. The increase in rental income is the result of TimePayment lease contracts coming to term and converting to rentals. Most of our service contract revenue is derived from our LeaseComm portfolio, for which we have not purchased any new security service contracts since 2004. Consequently, our service contract revenue represents a less significant portion of our revenue stream over time. However, during the three months ended June 30, 2012, TimePayment acquired a limited number of service contracts.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Selling, general and administrative	$	4,025			(0.3	)%	$	4,037
As a percent of revenue		27.4	%					30.0	%

Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include costs of maintaining corporate functions including accounting, finance, collections, legal, human resources, sales and underwriting, and information systems. SG&A expenses also include commissions, service fees and other marketing costs associated with our portfolio of leases and rental contracts. SG&A expenses decreased by $12,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. Increases in compensation-related expenses during the second quarter of 2012 were offset by reductions in other expense categories. The number of employees as of June 30, 2012, was 139 compared to 129 as of June 30, 2011.

18

Provision for Credit Losses

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Provision for credit losses	$	4,548			7.0	%	$	4,251
As a percent of revenue		30.9	%					31.6	%

We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against losses in our portfolio. Our provision for credit losses increased by $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, while net charge-offs increased by 2.9% to $4.4 million. The provision was based on providing a general allowance on leases funded during the period and our analysis of actual and expected losses in our portfolio. The decrease in the allowance as a percentage of revenue reflects improvements in delinquency levels of the lease portfolio.

Depreciation and Amortization

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Depreciation – fixed assets	$	152			25.6	%	$	121
Depreciation – rental equipment		913			37.9			662
Total depreciation and amortization	$	1,065			36.0	%	$	783
As a percent of revenue		7.2	%					5.8	%

Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation on fixed assets and rental equipment. Fixed assets are recorded at cost and depreciated over their expected useful lives. Certain rental contracts are originated as a result of the renewal provisions of our lease agreements where at the end of lease term, the customer may elect to continue to rent the leased equipment on a month-to-month basis. The rental equipment is recorded at its residual value and depreciated over a term of 12 months. This term represents the estimated life of a previously leased piece of equipment and is based upon our historical experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 12 month period, the remaining net book value is expensed.

Depreciation expense on rental contracts increased by $0.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in depreciation is due to the increase in the overall size of our portfolio of rental equipment due to the increase in the number of TimePayment lease contracts reaching maturity and converting to rentals. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased by $31,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Interest Expense

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest	$	655			(3.7	)%	$	680
As a percent of revenue		4.5	%					5.1	%

We pay interest on borrowings under our revolving line of credit. Interest expense decreased by $25,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. This decrease resulted primarily from a reduction in interest rates, partially offset by an increase in the level of borrowing on our revolving line of credit. At June 30, 2012, the balance on our revolving line of credit was $68.5 million compared to $59.6 million at June 30, 2011. The interest rate on our loans at June 30, 2012 was between 3.1% and 4.0%, as compared to interest rates between 3.49% and 4.5% at June 30, 2011.

19

Provision for Income Taxes

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Provision for income taxes	$	1,761			23.2	%	$	1,429
As a percent of revenue		12.0	%					10.6	%
As a percent of income before taxes		40.0	%					38.5	%

The provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets, involves summarizing temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as leases, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on the balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income or tax carry-back availability and to the extent we believe recovery is more likely than not, a valuation allowance is unnecessary. The provision for income taxes increased by $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011. This increase resulted primarily from the $0.7 million increase in pre-tax income combined with an increase in the accrual rate from 38.5% at June 30, 2011 to 40.0% at June 30, 2012 due to the utilization of federal and certain state net operating loss carryforwards in prior periods that are no longer available.

As of December 31, 2011, we had a liability of $17,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a liability of $4,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to various state income tax matters. As of June 30, 2012, we had a liability of $67,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a liability of $8,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to a state income tax matter. The increase in the unrecognized tax benefit relates to additional exposure related to an ongoing audit. It is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change significantly within the next 12 months; however, at this time we are unable to estimate the change.

Our federal income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after December 31, 2008, and our state income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after December 31, 2007.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

For financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable, and other liabilities, we believe that the carrying amount approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. The fair value of the revolving line of credit is calculated based on the incremental borrowing rates currently available on loans with similar terms and maturities. During the third quarter of 2011, we amended our revolving line of credit which reduced our interest rate to a more current rate. We have determined that the fair value of our revolving line of credit at June 30, 2012 approximates its carrying value.

Results of Operations - Six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011

Revenue

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Income on financing leases	$	19,555		7.2	%	$	18,237
Rental income		4,719		15.7			4,079
Income on service contracts		170		(19.4	)		211
Loss and damage waiver fees		2,608		7.7			2,421
Service fees and other income		1,887		1.3			1,863
Total revenues	$	28,939		7.9	%	$	26,811

Our lease contracts are accounted for as financing leases. At origination, we record the gross lease receivable, the estimated residual value of the leased equipment, initial direct costs incurred and the unearned lease income. Unearned lease income is the amount by which the gross lease receivable plus the estimated residual value exceeds the cost of the equipment. Unearned lease income and initial direct costs incurred are amortized over the related lease term using the interest method. Other revenues such as loss and damage waiver fees, service fees relating to the leases and contracts, and rental revenues are recognized as they are earned.

20

Total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012, were $28.9 million, an increase of $2.1 million, or 7.9%, from the six months ended June 30, 2011. The overall increase was due to an increase of $1.3 million in income on financing leases, an increase of $0.6 million in rental income and a $0.2 million increase in fees and other income. The increase in income on financing leases is a result of the continued growth in new lease originations. The increase in loss and damage waiver fees is related to an increase in the number of leases subject to such fees as the overall lease portfolio grows. The increase in rental income is the result of TimePayment lease contracts coming to term and converting to rentals.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Selling, general and administrative	$	8,381			4.9	%	$	7,990
As a percent of revenue		29.0	%					29.8	%

Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include costs of maintaining corporate functions including accounting, finance, collections, legal, human resources, sales and underwriting, and information systems. SG&A expenses also include commissions, service fees and other marketing costs associated with our portfolio of leases and rental contracts. SG&A expenses increased by $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was primarily driven by increases in compensation related expenses of $0.5 million.

Provision for Credit Losses

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Provision for credit losses	$	9,444			4.9	%	$	9,003
As a percent of revenue		32.6	%					33.6	%

We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against losses in our portfolio. Our provision for credit losses increased by $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. Net charge-offs increased by 3.8% to $9.6 million. The provision is based on providing a general allowance on leases funded during the period and our analysis of actual and expected losses in our portfolio. Although the overall allowance increased, the allowance as a percentage of revenue decreased from 33.6% at June 30, 2011, to 32.6% as of June 30, 2012. The reduction in the allowance as a percentage of revenue reflects improvements in delinquency levels of the lease portfolio and a reduction in charge-off levels.

Depreciation and Amortization

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Depreciation – fixed assets	$	303			25.7	%	$	241
Depreciation – rental equipment		1,770			44.7			1,223
Total depreciation and amortization	$	2,073			41.6	%	$	1,464
As a percent of revenue		7.2	%					5.5	%

Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation on fixed assets and rental equipment, and the amortization of service contracts. Fixed assets are recorded at cost and depreciated over their expected useful lives. Certain rental contracts are originated as a result of the renewal provisions of our lease agreements where at the end of lease term, the customer may elect to continue to rent the leased equipment on a month-to-month basis. The rental equipment is recorded at its residual value and depreciated over a term of 12 months. This term represents the estimated life of a previously leased piece of equipment and is based upon our historical experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 12 month period, the remaining net book value is expensed.

21

Depreciation expense on rental contracts increased by $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in depreciation is due to the increase in the overall size of our portfolio of rental equipment. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased by $62,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, due to additions acquired during 2011.

Interest Expense

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest	$	1,288			(4.1	)%	$	1,343
As a percent of revenue		4.5	%					5.0	%

We pay interest on borrowings under our revolving line of credit. Interest expense decreased by $55,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. This decrease resulted primarily from a reduction in interest rates, partially offset by an increase in the level of borrowing on our revolving line of credit. At June 30, 2012, the balance on our revolving line of credit was $68.5 million compared to $59.6 million at June 30, 2011. The interest rate on our loans at June 30, 2012, was between 3.1% and 4.0%, as compared to rates between 3.49% and 4.5% at June 30, 2011.

Provision for Income Taxes

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			Change			2011
	(Dollars in thousands)
Provision for income taxes	$	3,101			14.9	%	$	2,699
As a percent of revenue		10.7	%					10.1	%
As a percent of income before taxes		40.0	%					38.5	%

The provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets, involves summarizing temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as leases, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on the balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income or tax carry-back availability and to the extent we believe recovery is more likely than not, a valuation allowance is unnecessary. The provision for income taxes increased by $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. This increase resulted primarily from the $0.7 million increase in pre-tax income combined with an increase in the accrual rate from 38.5% at June 30, 2011 to 40.0% at June 30, 2012 due to the utilization of federal and certain state net operating loss carryforwards in prior periods that are no longer available.

As of December 31, 2011, we had a liability of $17,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a liability of $4,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to various state income tax matters. As of June 30, 2012, we had a liability of $67,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a liability of $8,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to a state income tax matter. The increase in the unrecognized tax benefit relates to additional exposure related to an ongoing audit. It is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change significantly within the next 12 months; however, at this time we are unable to estimate the change.

Our federal income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after December 31, 2008, and our state income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after December 31, 2007.

22

Exposure to Credit Losses

The amounts in the table below represent the balance of delinquent receivables on an exposure basis for all leases, rental contracts, and service contracts in our portfolio. An exposure basis aging classifies the entire receivable based on the invoice that is the most delinquent. For example, in the case of a rental or service contract, if a receivable is 90 days past due, all amounts billed and unpaid are placed in the over 90 days past due category. In the case of lease receivables, where the minimum contractual obligation of the lessee is booked as a receivable at the inception of the lease, if a receivable is 90 days past due, the entire receivable, including all amounts billed and unpaid as well as the minimum contractual obligation yet to be billed, will be placed in the over 90 days past due category.

(dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
Current	$	179,361	86.2	%	$	170,038	84.8	%
31-60 days past due		5,943	2.9			6,600	3.3
61-90 days past due		4,428	2.1			4,324	2.2
Over 90 days past due		18,325	8.8			19,537	9.7
Gross receivables due in installments	$	208,057	100.0	%	$	200,499	100.0	%

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Our lease and finance business is capital-intensive and requires access to substantial short-term and long-term credit to fund lease originations. Since inception, we have funded our operations primarily through borrowings under our credit facilities, on-balance sheet securitizations, the issuance of subordinated debt, free cash flow and our initial public offering completed in February 1999. We will continue to require significant additional capital to maintain and expand our funding of leases and contracts, as well as to fund any future acquisitions of leasing companies or portfolios. In the near term, we expect to finance our business utilizing the cash on hand, free cash flow, and our line of credit which matures in August 2014. Additionally, our uses of cash include the payment of interest and principal on borrowings, selling, general and administrative expenses, income taxes, payment of dividends and capital expenditures.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, our primary sources of liquidity were cash provided by operating activities and borrowings on our revolving line of credit. We generated cash flow from operations of $41.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $41.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2012, we had approximately $68.5 million outstanding under our revolving line of credit facility and had available borrowing capacity of approximately $31.5 million as described below.

We used net cash in investing activities of $45.7 million and $37.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Investing activities primarily relate to the origination of leases, and the increase in cash used is consistent with our focused and targeted sales and marketing effort.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and net cash used in financing activities was $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Financing activities primarily consist of the borrowings and repayments under our revolving line of credit facility and dividend payments.

The maturity date of our revolving line of credit is August 2014, at which time the outstanding loan balance plus interest becomes due and payable. At our option upon maturity, the unpaid principal balance may be converted to a six-month term loan.

23

Borrowings

We utilize our revolving line of credit to fund the origination and acquisition of leases that satisfy the eligibility requirements established pursuant to the facility. Borrowings outstanding consist of the following:

	June 30, 2012								December 31, 2011
(dollars in 000)	Amounts Outstanding		Interest Rate		Unused Capacity		Maximum Facility Amount		Amounts Outstanding		Interest Rate		Unused Capacity		Maximum Facility Amount
Revolving line of credit facility (1)	$	68,538		3.10-4.00%	$	31,462	$	100,000	$	62,740		3.13-4.00%	$	37,260	$	100,000

⁽¹⁾  The unused capacity is subject to the borrowing base formula.

At June 30, 2012, $57.0 million of our loans were LIBOR Loans and $11.5 million of our loans were Prime Rate Loans. As of June 30, 2012, the qualified lease receivables eligible under the borrowing base exceeded the $100 million revolving line of credit. See additional details related to our revolving line of credit in Note F to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Dividends

Dividends declared and paid or payable were as follows:

	2012
	Date Declared		Record Date		Payment Date		Dividend per Share
		January 31, 2012		February 10, 2012		February 15, 2012	$	0.06
		April 19, 2012		April 30, 2012		May 15, 2012		0.06
		July 19, 2012		July 30, 2012		August 15, 2012		0.06
Total							$	0.18
	2011
	Date Declared		Record Date		Payment Date		Dividend per Share
		January 21, 2011		February 1, 2011		February 15, 2011	$	0.05
		April 21, 2011		May 2, 2011		May 13, 2011		0.05
		July 20, 2011		August 1, 2011		August 15, 2011		0.05
Total							$	0.15

Future dividend payments are subject to ongoing review and evaluation by our Board of Directors. The decision as to the amount and timing of future dividends, if any, will be made in light of our financial condition, capital requirements and growth plans, as well as our external financing arrangements and any other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant. We can give no assurance as to the amount and timing of future dividends.

Share repurchases

On August 10, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program under which we are authorized to purchase up to 250,000 of our outstanding shares from time to time. The repurchases may take place in either the open market or through block trades. The repurchase program will be funded by our working capital and may be suspended or discontinued at anytime. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock under our stock buyback program. Since the program’s inception, we have repurchased a total of 86,295 shares of our common stock at a total cost of approximately $378,000.

24

Contractual Obligations and Lease Commitments

Contractual Obligations

We have entered into various agreements, such as debt and operating lease agreements that require future payments. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we had borrowed $65.6 million against our revolving line of credit and had repaid $59.8 million. The $68.5 million of outstanding borrowings as of June 30, 2012, will be repaid by the daily application of TimePayment receipts to our outstanding balance.

Our future minimum cash lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

	2012		2013		2014		2015		2016		Thereafter
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating lease obligations	$	363	$	738	$	638	$	595	$	607	$	980

Lease Commitments

We accept lease applications on a daily basis and have a pipeline of applications that have been approved, where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to lend does not become binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been completed, including but not limited to the receipt of a complete and accurate lease document, all required supporting information and successful verification with the lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is successfully verified, we have no firm outstanding commitments to lend.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

None.

25

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The following discussion about our risk management activities includes forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. In the normal course of operations, we also face risks that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include credit risk and legal risk, and are not represented in the analysis that follows.

The implicit yield on all of our leases and contracts is on a fixed interest rate basis due to the leases and contracts having scheduled payments that are fixed at the time of origination. When we originate or acquire leases or contracts, we base our pricing in part on the spread we expect to achieve between the implicit yield on each lease or contract and the effective interest rate we expect to incur in financing such lease or contract through our credit facility. Increases in interest rates during the term of each lease or contract could narrow or eliminate the spread, or result in a negative spread.

Given the relatively short average life of our leases and contracts, our goal is to maintain a blend of fixed and variable interest rate obligations which limits our interest rate risk. As of June 30, 2012, we have repaid all of our fixed-rate debt and have $68.5 million of outstanding variable interest rate obligations under our revolving line of credit.

Our revolving line of credit bears interest at rates which fluctuate with changes in the Prime Rate or LIBOR; therefore, our interest expense is sensitive to changes in market interest rates. The effect of a 10% adverse change in market interest rates, sustained for one year, on our interest expense would be immaterial.

We maintain an investment portfolio in accordance with our investment policy guidelines. The primary objectives of the investment guidelines are to preserve capital, maintain sufficient liquidity to meet our operating needs, and to maximize return. We minimize investment risk by limiting the amount invested in any single security and by focusing on conservative investment choices with short terms and high credit quality standards. We do not use derivative financial instruments or invest for speculative trading purposes.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures: As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

Internal control over financial reporting: During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, no changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

26

Part II - Other Information

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. Although we do not expect that the outcome of any of these matters, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, litigation is inherently unpredictable. Therefore, judgments could be rendered, or settlements entered, that could adversely affect our operating results or cash flows in a particular period. We routinely assess all of our litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately incurring a liability, and record our best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where we assess the likelihood of loss as probable.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

For a discussion of the material risks that we face relating to our business, financial performance and industry, as well as other risks that an investor in our common stock may face, see the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and elsewhere in this report are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.

ITEM 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits index

3.1	Restated Articles of Organization, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 in the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-56639, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 9, 1998).
3.2	Restated Bylaws, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 in the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2007).
10.1	MicroFinancial Incorporated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 in the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, No. 333-182818, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 24, 2012).
31.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101**	The following materials from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and twelve months ended December 31, 2011, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

* Filed herewith

27

** Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections

28

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MicroFinancial Incorporated

By: /s/ Richard F. Latour

President and Chief Executive Officer

By: /s/ James R. Jackson Jr.

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2012

29

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard F. Latour, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, of MicroFinancial Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ RICHARD F. LATOUR

Richard F. Latour

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 14, 2012

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, James R. Jackson, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, of MicroFinancial Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ James R. Jackson Jr.

James R. Jackson Jr.

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2012

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

MicroFinancial Incorporated

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the

Quarter Ended June 30, 2012

Richard F. Latour, President and Chief Executive Officer of MicroFinancial Incorporated, (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2012, (the “Covered Report”) and, except as corrected or supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

• the Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

• the information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has signed this Certification as of August 14, 2012.

/s/ Richard F. Latour

President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

MicroFinancial Incorporated

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the

Quarter Ended June 30, 2012

James R. Jackson Jr., Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MicroFinancial Incorporated, (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2012, (the “Covered Report”) and, except as corrected or supplemented in a subsequent covered report:

• the Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

• the information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has signed this Certification as of August 14, 2012.

/s/ James R. Jackson Jr.

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

XML

Stock-Based Employee Compensation (Details Textual) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Feb. 29, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Stock-Based Employee Compensation (Textual) [Abstract]
Shares of the restricted stock vest over Period	5 years
Stock-Based Employee Compensation (Additional Textual) [Abstract]
Unissued common stock reserved under equity incentive plan		61,251		61,251
Fair value of awards, granted	$ 6.60			$ 6.60
Number of shares of restricted stock vest				25,165
Percentage of restricted stock units vesting annually beginning on second anniversary of grant date				25.00%
Number of shares of restricted stock cliff vest				15,228
Granted stock vested	31,820
Total grant date fair value	$ 210,000
Share based compensation cost recognized		49,000	33,000	94,000	68,000
Performance Shares [Member]
Stock-Based Employee Compensation (Textual) [Abstract]
Shares of the restricted stock vest over Period	3 years
2008 Equity incentive plan [Member]
Stock-Based Employee Compensation (Textual) [Abstract]
Reserved shares of common stock for issuance		1,000,000		1,000,000
Restricted Stock Units Number of Share [Member]
Stock-Based Employee Compensation (Textual) [Abstract]
Granted restricted stock units				40,393
Amortized compensation expense related to the restricted stock units		$ 29,000	$ 12,000	$ 52,000	$ 22,000
Restricted Stock Units Number of Share [Member] | Executive Officer [Member]
Stock-Based Employee Compensation (Textual) [Abstract]
Granted restricted stock units				40,393
2012 Equity incentive plan [Member]
Stock-Based Employee Compensation (Textual) [Abstract]
Reserved shares of common stock for issuance		750,000		750,000
2008 and 2012 Equity incentive plan [Member]
Stock-Based Employee Compensation (Textual) [Abstract]
Total potential future grants		811,251		811,251

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality (Details 1) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Aged analysis of past due financing receivables by our internally developed proprietary scoring model in leases
Current	$ 143,626	$ 129,877
31 to 60 days Past Due	4,709	4,406
61 to 90 days Past Due	3,640	3,330
Over 90 Days Past Due	16,382	17,185
Aging of recorded investment in lease	168,357	154,798
Over 90 Days Accruing	16,382	17,185
Percent of Total Financing Receivables, Current	85.30%	83.90%
Percent of Total Financing Receivables, 31 to 60 days Past Due	2.80%	2.80%
Percent of Total Financing Receivables, 61 to 90 days Past Due	2.20%	2.20%
Percent of Total Financing Receivables, Over 90 Days Past Due	9.70%	11.10%
Percent of Total Financing Receivables	100.00%	100.00%
TimePayment Corp [Member]
Aged analysis of past due financing receivables by our internally developed proprietary scoring model in leases
Current	143,487	129,694
31 to 60 days Past Due	4,703	4,395
61 to 90 days Past Due	3,634	3,322
Over 90 Days Past Due	16,245	16,972
Aging of recorded investment in lease	168,069	154,383
Over 90 Days Accruing	16,245	16,972
LeaseComm Corporation [Member]
Aged analysis of past due financing receivables by our internally developed proprietary scoring model in leases
Current	139	183
31 to 60 days Past Due	6	11
61 to 90 days Past Due	6	8
Over 90 Days Past Due	137	213
Aging of recorded investment in lease	288	415
Over 90 Days Accruing	137	213
Gold [Member] | TimePayment Corp [Member]
Aged analysis of past due financing receivables by our internally developed proprietary scoring model in leases
Current	52,912	45,456
31 to 60 days Past Due	2,061	1,372
61 to 90 days Past Due	951	540
Over 90 Days Past Due	1,980	1,713
Aging of recorded investment in lease	57,904	49,081
Over 90 Days Accruing	1,980	1,713
Silver [Member] | TimePayment Corp [Member]
Aged analysis of past due financing receivables by our internally developed proprietary scoring model in leases
Current	84,260	79,753
31 to 60 days Past Due	2,288	2,762
61 to 90 days Past Due	2,363	2,488
Over 90 Days Past Due	12,505	13,351
Aging of recorded investment in lease	101,416	98,354
Over 90 Days Accruing	12,505	13,351
Bronze [Member] | TimePayment Corp [Member]
Aged analysis of past due financing receivables by our internally developed proprietary scoring model in leases
Current	6,315	4,485
31 to 60 days Past Due	354	261
61 to 90 days Past Due	320	294
Over 90 Days Past Due	1,760	1,908
Aging of recorded investment in lease	8,749	6,948
Over 90 Days Accruing	$ 1,760	$ 1,908

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

B. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements. Accordingly, our interim statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required for our annual financial statements. In the opinion of our management, the condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim results. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The results for the six months ended June 30, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2012.

The balance sheet at December 31, 2011, has been derived from the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Segment Reporting

We operate in one industry segment that leases and rents “microticket” equipment and provides other financing services. All of our operations are located in the United States. Accordingly, we believe we have a single reportable segment for disclosure purposes.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality of Loans

We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against losses in our portfolio. Given the nature of the “microticket” market and the individual size of each transaction, we do not have a formal credit review committee to review individual transactions. Rather, we developed a sophisticated, multi-tiered pricing model and have automated the credit scoring, approval and collection processes. We believe that with the proper pricing model, we can grant credit to a wide range of applicants provided we have priced appropriately for the associated risk. As a result of approving a wide range of credits, we experience a relatively high level of delinquency and write-offs in our portfolio. We periodically review the credit scoring and approval process to ensure that the automated system is making appropriate credit decisions. Given the nature of the “microticket” market and the individual size of each transaction, we do not evaluate transactions individually for the purpose of developing and determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Contracts in our portfolio are not re-graded subsequent to the initial extension of credit and the allowance is not allocated to specific contracts. Rather, we view the contracts as having common characteristics and maintain a general allowance against our entire portfolio utilizing historical collection statistics and an assessment of current credit risk in the portfolio as the basis for the amount.

We have adopted a consistent, systematic procedure for establishing and maintaining an appropriate allowance for credit losses for our microticket transactions. We estimate the likelihood of credit losses net of recoveries in the portfolio at each reporting period based upon a combination of the lessee’s bureau reported credit score at lease inception and the current delinquency status of the account. In addition to these elements, we also consider other relevant factors including general economic trends, trends in delinquencies and credit losses, static pool analysis of our portfolio, trends in recoveries made on charged off accounts, and other relevant factors which might affect the performance of our portfolio. This combination of historical experience, credit scores, delinquency levels, trends in credit losses, and the review of current factors provide the basis for our analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. In general a receivable is uncollectable when it is 360 days past due or earlier, if other adverse events occur with respect to an account. None of our receivables are placed on non-accrual status as accounts are charged off when deemed uncollectible. Historically, the typical monthly payment under our microticket leases has been small and as a result, our experience is that lessees will pay past due amounts later in the process because of the relatively small amount necessary to bring an account current.

We segregate our lease portfolio between TimePayment Corp. and Leasecomm Corp. to perform the calculation and analysis of the allowance for loan losses. Each company consists of a single portfolio segment – microticket equipment. Leases of microticket equipment are made to businesses and individuals and are generally secured by assets of the business or a personal guarantee. Repayment is expected from the cash flows of the business or individual. A weakened economy, and resultant decreased consumer spending, may have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.

Each period the provision for credit losses in the income statement results from the combination of an estimate by management of credit losses that occurred during the current period and the ongoing adjustment of prior estimates of losses occurring in prior periods. To serve as a basis for making this provision, we maintain an internally developed proprietary scoring model that considers several factors including the lessee’s bureau reported credit score at lease inception. We also consider other relevant factors including general economic trends, trends in delinquencies and credit losses, static pool analysis of our portfolio, trends in recoveries made on charged off accounts, and other relevant factors which might affect the performance of our portfolio. The combination of historical experience, credit scores, delinquency levels, trends in credit losses, and the review of current factors provide the basis for our analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses.

We assign internal risk ratings for all lessees and determine the credit worthiness of each lease based upon this internally developed proprietary scoring model. The LeaseComm portfolio is evaluated in total with a reserve of 50% of the outstanding amount greater than 90 days plus 25% of the amount outstanding from 1 to 89 days. The TimePayment scoring model generates one of nine acceptable risk ratings based upon the credit worthiness of each lease or it rejects the lease application. The scores are assigned at lease inception and these scores are maintained over the lease term regardless of payment performance. To facilitate review and reporting, management aggregates these nine scores into one of three categories with similar risk profiles and delinquency characteristics identified as Gold, Silver or Bronze.

• Leases assigned a gold rating represent those transactions which exhibit the best risk rating based on our internal credit scores. They are considered of sufficient quality to preclude an otherwise adverse rating. Gold rated leases are typically represented by lessees with high bureau reported credit scores for personal guarantors at lease inception or are supported by established businesses for those transactions which are not personally guaranteed by the lessee.

• Leases assigned a silver rating fall in the middle range of the nine acceptable scores generated by the scoring model. These transactions possess a reasonable amount of risk based on their profile and may exhibit vulnerability to deterioration if adverse factors are encountered. These accounts typically demonstrate adequate coverage but warrant a higher level of monitoring by management to ensure that weaknesses do not advance.

• A bronze rating applies to leases at the lower end of the nine acceptable scores generated by the scoring model whereby the lessee may have difficulty meeting the lease obligation if adverse factors are encountered. Bronze rated transactions typically have lower reported credit scores at lease inception and will typically have other less desirable credit attributes.

See Note C for details of our allowance for credit losses and the aged analysis of past due financing receivables based upon our internally-developed proprietary lease scoring model.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Accounting for fair value measurements involves a single definition of fair value, along with a conceptual framework to measure fair value, with fair value defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an order transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” The fair value measurement hierarchy consists of three levels:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumption which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

We apply valuation techniques that (1) place greater reliance on observable inputs and less reliance on unobservable inputs and (2) are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, other assets, accounts payable and other liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments, valued using Level 3 inputs, as described above. The fair value of the amounts outstanding under our revolving line of credit, evaluated using Level 2 inputs as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, approximate the carrying value. We have elected not to mark the amount outstanding under this facility to market.

Stock-based Employee Compensation

We have adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires us to recognize the compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions with employees in the financial statements. The compensation cost is measured based upon the fair value of the instrument issued. Share-based compensation transactions with employees covered by FASB ASC Topic 718 include share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.

Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net income per share does not assume the issuance of common shares that have an antidilutive effect on net income per common share.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid instruments purchased with original maturities of less than three months to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

Concentration of Credit Risk

We deposit our cash and invest in short-term investments primarily through national commercial banks. Deposits in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) are exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance by the institution. The Company has had cash deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance coverage.

XML

Revolving Line of Credit (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended	10 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2010	Oct. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jul. 31, 2010	Feb. 28, 2009	Jul. 31, 2008	Aug. 02, 2007
Revolving Line of Credit (Textual) [Abstract]
Interest rate on line of credit borrowings	Prime plus 1.75% or at a London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 3.75%	Prime plus 0.75% or LIBOR plus 2.75%
Revolving Line of Credit (Additional Textual) [Abstract]
Borrowing capacity under revolving line of credit				$ 100	$ 85	$ 60	$ 30
Line of credit facility outstanding LIBOR loan amount			57.0
Line of credit facility outstanding Prime Rate Loan amount			11.5
Available on revolving line of credit			$ 31.5
Term loan period for converted unpaid balance			6 months
Prime [Member]
Revolving Line of Credit (Textual) [Abstract]
Spread on interest Rate on line of credit borrowings		0.75%		1.25%
LIBOR [Member]
Revolving Line of Credit (Textual) [Abstract]
Spread on interest Rate on line of credit borrowings		2.75%		3.25%
Maximum [Member]
Revolving Line of Credit (Textual) [Abstract]
Interest rate on loans			3.10%
Minimum [Member]
Revolving Line of Credit (Textual) [Abstract]
Interest rate on loans			4.00%

XML

Dividends (Details) (USD $)	1 Months Ended	6 Months Ended			12 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012 Dividend 1 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Dividend 1 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Dividend 2 [Member]	Dec. 31, 2011 Dividend 2 [Member]
Dividends declared and paid on a per share basis
Date declared				Jan. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2011	Apr. 19, 2012	Apr. 21, 2011
Shareholders of record date				Feb. 10, 2012	Feb. 01, 2011	Apr. 30, 2012	May 02, 2011
Date paid				Feb. 15, 2012	Feb. 15, 2011	May 15, 2012	May 13, 2011
Dividend per share				$ 0.06	$ 0.05	$ 0.06	$ 0.05
Dividend declared payable to stockholders	$ 0.06	$ 0.12	$ 0.10

XML

Stock Based Employee Compensation (Details)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012
Stock Awards [Member]
Stock and restricted stock unit grant and vesting activity
Non-vested at December 31, 2011
Granted	31,820
Vested	(31,820)
Non-vested at June 30, 2012
Restricted Stock Units Number of Share [Member]
Stock and restricted stock unit grant and vesting activity
Non-vested at December 31, 2011	66,562
Granted	40,393
Vested	(8,380)
Non-vested at June 30, 2012	98,575

XML

Stock Based Employee Compensation (Details 1) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Stock option activity
Stock option activity, shares, Beginning Balance	818,028
Stock option activity, Granted	0
Stock option activity, Expired	(235,000)
Stock option activity, Forfeited	0
Stock option activity, shares, Ending Balance	583,028
Share Based Compensation Shares Authorized Under Stock Option Plans Outstanding Price Range Lower Range Limit	$ 1.585
Stock option activity, Lower limit, Outstanding price per share, Beginning Balance		$ 1.585
Stock option activity, Upper limit, Outstanding price per share, Beginning Balance	$ 6.700
Stock option activity, Lower limit, Granted per share price	$ 0
Stock option activity, Lower limit, Expired per share price	$ 6.700
Stock option activity, Lower limit, Forfeited per share price	$ 0
Stock option activity, Lower limit, Outstanding price per share, Ending Balance	$ 1.585
Stock option activity, Upper limit, Outstanding price per share, Ending Balance	$ 5.850
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding at December 31, 2011	$ 4.19
Weighted average exercise price, Granted	$ 0
Weighted average exercise price, Expired	$ 6.70
Weighted average exercise price, Forfeited	$ 0
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Outstanding at June 30, 2012	$ 3.17

XML

Nature of Business

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Nature of Business [Abstract]

Nature of Business

A. Nature of Business

MicroFinancial Incorporated (referred to as “MicroFinancial,” “we,” “us” or “our”) operates primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, TimePayment Corp. and LeaseComm Corporation. TimePayment is a specialized commercial finance company that leases and rents “microticket” equipment and provides other financing services. LeaseComm started originating leases in January 1986 and in October 2002 suspended virtually all originations due to an interruption in financing. TimePayment commenced originating leases in July 2004. The average amount financed by TimePayment during 2011 was approximately $5,900 compared to the 2012 year to date average of $5,500. LeaseComm historically financed contracts of approximately $1,900. We primarily source our originations through a nationwide network of independent equipment vendors, sales organizations and other dealer-based origination networks. We fund our operations through cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under our revolving line of credit.

XML

Stock Based Employee Compensation (Details 2) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012
Stock options [Member]
Outstanding stock options
Exercise Price	$ 1.585
Shares, Outstanding	150,000
Weighted-Average Life (Years), Outstanding	4 months 28 days
Intrinsic Values Outstanding, at stock option plan exercise price	$ 977,000
Weighted-Average Exercise Price, Exercisable	$ 1.585
Shares, Exercisable	150,000
Intrinsic Values Exercisable, at stock option plan exercise price	977,000
Stock Options Two [Member]
Outstanding stock options
Exercise Price	$ 2.300
Shares, Outstanding	258,723
Weighted-Average Life (Years), Outstanding	6 years 8 months 1 day
Intrinsic Values Outstanding, at stock option plan exercise price	1,501,000
Weighted-Average Exercise Price, Exercisable	$ 2.300
Shares, Exercisable	129,362
Intrinsic Values Exercisable, at stock option plan exercise price	750,000
Stock Options Three [Member]
Outstanding stock options
Exercise Price	$ 5.770
Shares, Outstanding	31,923
Weighted-Average Life (Years), Outstanding	4 years 8 months 1 day
Intrinsic Values Outstanding, at stock option plan exercise price	74,000
Weighted-Average Exercise Price, Exercisable	$ 5.770
Shares, Exercisable	31,923
Intrinsic Values Exercisable, at stock option plan exercise price	74,000
Stock Options Four [Member]
Outstanding stock options
Exercise Price	$ 5.850
Shares, Outstanding	142,382
Weighted-Average Life (Years), Outstanding	5 years 6 months 29 days
Intrinsic Values Outstanding, at stock option plan exercise price	320,000
Weighted-Average Exercise Price, Exercisable	$ 5.850
Shares, Exercisable	106,787
Intrinsic Values Exercisable, at stock option plan exercise price	240,000
Stock Options Five [Member]
Outstanding stock options
Shares, Outstanding	583,028
Weighted-Average Life (Years), Outstanding	4 years 8 months 5 days
Intrinsic Values Outstanding, at stock option plan exercise price	2,872,000
Weighted-Average Exercise Price, Exercisable	$ 3.220
Shares, Exercisable	418,072
Intrinsic Values Exercisable, at stock option plan exercise price	$ 2,041,000

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 2,235	$ 2,452
Restricted cash	296	382
Net investment in leases:
Receivables due in installments	208,057	200,499
Estimated residual value	23,844	23,287
Initial direct costs	1,682	1,476
Less:
Advance lease payments and deposits	(3,388)	(3,530)
Unearned income	(61,838)	(59,946)
Allowance for credit losses	(13,030)	(13,180)
Net investment in leases	155,327	148,606
Investment in Service Contracts, net	120
Investment in rental contracts, net	1,046	898
Property and equipment, net	1,730	1,911
Other assets	2,373	1,093
Total assets	163,127	155,342
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Revolving line of credit	68,538	62,740
Accounts payable	2,984	2,546
Capital lease obligation		1
Dividends payable	28	19
Other liabilities	2,757	2,220
Income taxes payable		760
Deferred income taxes	9,869	11,333
Total liabilities	84,176	79,619
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011
Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 0 and 14,257,324 shares issued at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively	143	143
Additional paid-in capital	47,031	46,727
Retained earnings	31,777	28,853
Total stockholders' equity	78,951	75,723
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 163,127	$ 155,342

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]
Common stock dividends per share	$ 0.10	$ 0.21

XML

Subsequent Events (Details) (USD $)	1 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Subsequent Events (Textual) [Abstract]
Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Declared	$ 0.06	$ 0.12	$ 0.10

XML

Nature of Business (Details Textual) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
TimePayment Corp [Member]
Subsidiary of Limited Liability Company or Limited Partnership (Textual) [Abstract]
Average Amount Financed by Subsidiary	$ 5,500	$ 5,900
LeaseComm Corporation [Member]
Subsidiary of Limited Liability Company or Limited Partnership (Textual) [Abstract]
Average Amount Financed by Subsidiary	$ 1,900	$ 1,900

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Credit losses by portfolio segment
Allowance for credit losses, Beginning balance	$ 13,180	$ 13,132
Charge-Offs	(12,220)	(11,733)
Recoveries	2,626	2,493
Provisions	9,444	9,003
Allowance for credit losses, Ending balance	13,030	12,895
Allowance for credit losses: individually evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance
Allowance for credit losses: collectively evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance	13,030	12,895
Allowance for credit losses: contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality, Ending Balance
Financing receivables, Ending Balance	168,357	154,798
Financing receivables: individually evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance
Financing Receivables: collectively evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance	168,357	154,798
Financing receivables: contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality, Ending Balance
LeaseComm Microticket Equipment [Member]
Credit losses by portfolio segment
Allowance for credit losses, Beginning balance	162	231
Charge-Offs	(332)	(394)
Recoveries	136	641
Provisions	160	(290)
Allowance for credit losses, Ending balance	126	188
Allowance for credit losses: individually evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance
Allowance for credit losses: collectively evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance	126	188
Allowance for credit losses: contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality, Ending Balance
Financing receivables, Ending Balance	288	415
Financing receivables: individually evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance
Financing Receivables: collectively evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance	288	415
Financing receivables: contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality, Ending Balance
TimePayment Microticket Equipment [Member]
Credit losses by portfolio segment
Allowance for credit losses, Beginning balance	13,018	12,901
Charge-Offs	(11,888)	(11,339)
Recoveries	2,490	1,852
Provisions	9,284	9,293
Allowance for credit losses, Ending balance	12,904	12,707
Allowance for credit losses: individually evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance
Allowance for credit losses: collectively evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance	12,904	12,207
Allowance for credit losses: contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality, Ending Balance
Financing receivables, Ending Balance	168,069	154,383
Financing receivables: individually evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance
Financing Receivables: collectively evaluated for impairment, Ending Balance	168,069	154,383
Financing receivables: contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality, Ending Balance

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash received from customers	$ 59,232	$ 52,469
Cash paid to suppliers and employees	(10,118)	(9,240)
Cash paid for income taxes	(6,647)	(238)
Interest paid	(1,133)	(1,229)
Interest received		1
Net cash provided by operating activities	41,334	41,763
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment in lease, rental and service contracts	(44,761)	(36,635)
Investment in direct costs	(831)	(498)
Investment in property and equipment	(123)	(734)
Net cash used in investing activities	(45,715)	(37,867)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from secured debt	65,633	48,729
Repayment of secured debt	(59,835)	(51,805)
Payments of debt closing costs		(2)
Increase in restricted cash	86	(226)
Repayment of capital lease obligations	(1)	(20)
Repurchase of common stock		(240)
Payment of dividends	(1,719)	(1,426)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	4,164	(4,990)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(217)	(1,094)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	2,452	1,528
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	2,235	434
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income	4,652	4,312
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of unearned income, net of initial direct costs	(19,555)	(18,237)
Depreciation and amortization	2,073	1,464
Provision for credit losses	9,444	9,003
Recovery of equipment cost and residual value	46,945	40,715
Stock-based compensation expense	94	68
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Income taxes payable	(760)	137
Deferred income taxes	(1,464)	1,991
Other assets	(1,280)	311
Accounts payable	648	289
Other liabilities	537	1,710
Net cash provided by operating activities	41,334	41,763
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment through lease incentives		791
Fair market value of stock issued for compensation	$ 210	$ 212

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets [Abstract]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	25,000,000	25,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	14,257,324	14,257,324

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements. Accordingly, our interim statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required for our annual financial statements. In the opinion of our management, the condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim results. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The results for the six months ended June 30, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2012.

The balance sheet at December 31, 2011, has been derived from the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Segment Reporting

Segment Reporting

We operate in one industry segment that leases and rents “microticket” equipment and provides other financing services. All of our operations are located in the United States. Accordingly, we believe we have a single reportable segment for disclosure purposes.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality

Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality of Loans

We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against losses in our portfolio. Given the nature of the “microticket” market and the individual size of each transaction, we do not have a formal credit review committee to review individual transactions. Rather, we developed a sophisticated, multi-tiered pricing model and have automated the credit scoring, approval and collection processes. We believe that with the proper pricing model, we can grant credit to a wide range of applicants provided we have priced appropriately for the associated risk. As a result of approving a wide range of credits, we experience a relatively high level of delinquency and write-offs in our portfolio. We periodically review the credit scoring and approval process to ensure that the automated system is making appropriate credit decisions. Given the nature of the “microticket” market and the individual size of each transaction, we do not evaluate transactions individually for the purpose of developing and determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Contracts in our portfolio are not re-graded subsequent to the initial extension of credit and the allowance is not allocated to specific contracts. Rather, we view the contracts as having common characteristics and maintain a general allowance against our entire portfolio utilizing historical collection statistics and an assessment of current credit risk in the portfolio as the basis for the amount.

We have adopted a consistent, systematic procedure for establishing and maintaining an appropriate allowance for credit losses for our microticket transactions. We estimate the likelihood of credit losses net of recoveries in the portfolio at each reporting period based upon a combination of the lessee’s bureau reported credit score at lease inception and the current delinquency status of the account. In addition to these elements, we also consider other relevant factors including general economic trends, trends in delinquencies and credit losses, static pool analysis of our portfolio, trends in recoveries made on charged off accounts, and other relevant factors which might affect the performance of our portfolio. This combination of historical experience, credit scores, delinquency levels, trends in credit losses, and the review of current factors provide the basis for our analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. In general a receivable is uncollectable when it is 360 days past due or earlier, if other adverse events occur with respect to an account. None of our receivables are placed on non-accrual status as accounts are charged off when deemed uncollectible. Historically, the typical monthly payment under our microticket leases has been small and as a result, our experience is that lessees will pay past due amounts later in the process because of the relatively small amount necessary to bring an account current.

We segregate our lease portfolio between TimePayment Corp. and Leasecomm Corp. to perform the calculation and analysis of the allowance for loan losses. Each company consists of a single portfolio segment – microticket equipment. Leases of microticket equipment are made to businesses and individuals and are generally secured by assets of the business or a personal guarantee. Repayment is expected from the cash flows of the business or individual. A weakened economy, and resultant decreased consumer spending, may have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.

Each period the provision for credit losses in the income statement results from the combination of an estimate by management of credit losses that occurred during the current period and the ongoing adjustment of prior estimates of losses occurring in prior periods. To serve as a basis for making this provision, we maintain an internally developed proprietary scoring model that considers several factors including the lessee’s bureau reported credit score at lease inception. We also consider other relevant factors including general economic trends, trends in delinquencies and credit losses, static pool analysis of our portfolio, trends in recoveries made on charged off accounts, and other relevant factors which might affect the performance of our portfolio. The combination of historical experience, credit scores, delinquency levels, trends in credit losses, and the review of current factors provide the basis for our analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses.

We assign internal risk ratings for all lessees and determine the credit worthiness of each lease based upon this internally developed proprietary scoring model. The LeaseComm portfolio is evaluated in total with a reserve of 50% of the outstanding amount greater than 90 days plus 25% of the amount outstanding from 1 to 89 days. The TimePayment scoring model generates one of nine acceptable risk ratings based upon the credit worthiness of each lease or it rejects the lease application. The scores are assigned at lease inception and these scores are maintained over the lease term regardless of payment performance. To facilitate review and reporting, management aggregates these nine scores into one of three categories with similar risk profiles and delinquency characteristics identified as Gold, Silver or Bronze.

• Leases assigned a gold rating represent those transactions which exhibit the best risk rating based on our internal credit scores. They are considered of sufficient quality to preclude an otherwise adverse rating. Gold rated leases are typically represented by lessees with high bureau reported credit scores for personal guarantors at lease inception or are supported by established businesses for those transactions which are not personally guaranteed by the lessee.

• Leases assigned a silver rating fall in the middle range of the nine acceptable scores generated by the scoring model. These transactions possess a reasonable amount of risk based on their profile and may exhibit vulnerability to deterioration if adverse factors are encountered. These accounts typically demonstrate adequate coverage but warrant a higher level of monitoring by management to ensure that weaknesses do not advance.

• A bronze rating applies to leases at the lower end of the nine acceptable scores generated by the scoring model whereby the lessee may have difficulty meeting the lease obligation if adverse factors are encountered. Bronze rated transactions typically have lower reported credit scores at lease inception and will typically have other less desirable credit attributes.

See Note C for details of our allowance for credit losses and the aged analysis of past due financing receivables based upon our internally-developed proprietary lease scoring model.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Accounting for fair value measurements involves a single definition of fair value, along with a conceptual framework to measure fair value, with fair value defined as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an order transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” The fair value measurement hierarchy consists of three levels:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumption which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

We apply valuation techniques that (1) place greater reliance on observable inputs and less reliance on unobservable inputs and (2) are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, other assets, accounts payable and other liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments, valued using Level 3 inputs, as described above. The fair value of the amounts outstanding under our revolving line of credit, evaluated using Level 2 inputs as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, approximate the carrying value. We have elected not to mark the amount outstanding under this facility to market.

Stock-based Employee Compensation

Stock-based Employee Compensation

We have adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires us to recognize the compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions with employees in the financial statements. The compensation cost is measured based upon the fair value of the instrument issued. Share-based compensation transactions with employees covered by FASB ASC Topic 718 include share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.

Net Income Per Share

Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net income per share does not assume the issuance of common shares that have an antidilutive effect on net income per common share.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid instruments purchased with original maturities of less than three months to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of Credit Risk

We deposit our cash and invest in short-term investments primarily through national commercial banks. Deposits in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) are exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance by the institution. The Company has had cash deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance coverage.

XML

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jul. 31, 2012
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	MICROFINANCIAL INC
Entity Central Index Key	0000827230
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2012
Amendment Flag	false
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock Shares Outstanding		14,313,852

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality [Abstract]

Credit losses by portfolio segment

	Microticket equipment
	2012									2011
	LeaseComm			TimePayment			Total			LeaseComm			TimePayment			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	162		$	13,018		$	13,180		$	231		$	12,901		$	13,132
Charge-Offs		(332	)		(11,888	)		(12,220	)		(394	)		(11,339	)		(11,733	)
Recoveries		136			2,490			2,626			641			1,852			2,493
Provisions		160			9,284			9,444			(290	)		9,293			9,003
Ending balance, allowance for credit losses	$	126		$	12,904		$	13,030		$	188		$	12,707		$	12,895
Allowance for credit losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Collectively evaluated for impairment		126			12,904			13,030			188			12,707			12,895
Contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—			—			—			—			—			—
Ending balance, allowance for credit losses:	$	126		$	12,904		$	13,030		$	188		$	12,707		$	12,895
Financing Receivables (1):
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Collectively evaluated for impairment		288			168,069			168,357			415			154,383			154,798
Contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—			—			—			—			—			—
Ending balance, financing receivables	$	288		$	168,069		$	168,357		$	415		$	154,383		$	154,798

(1) Total financing receivables include net investment in leases. For purposes of asset quality and allowance calculations, the allowance for credit losses is excluded.

Aged analysis of past due financing receivables

	Current			31 to 60 days Past Due			61 to 90 days Past Due			Over 90 Days Past Due			Total			Over 90 Days Accruing
LeaseComm	$	139		$	6		$	6		$	137		$	288		$	137
TimePayment Corp.
Gold		52,912			2,061			951			1,980			57,904			1,980
Silver		84,260			2,288			2,363			12,505			101,416			12,505
Bronze		6,315			354			320			1,760			8,749			1,760
TimePayment Corp. subtotal		143,487			4,703			3,634			16,245			168,069			16,245
Total financing receivables	$	143,626		$	4,709		$	3,640		$	16,382		$	168,357		$	16,382
Percent of total financing receivables		85.3	%		2.8	%		2.2	%		9.7	%		100	%

	Current			31 to 60 days Past Due			61 to 90 days Past Due			Over 90 Days Past Due			Total			Over 90 Days Accruing
LeaseComm	$	183		$	11		$	8		$	213		$	415		$	213
TimePayment Corp.
Gold		45,456			1,372			540			1,713			49,081			1,713
Silver		79,753			2,762			2,488			13,351			98,354			13,351
Bronze		4,485			261			294			1,908			6,948			1,908
TimePayment Corp. subtotal		129,694			4,395			3,322			16,972			154,383			16,972
Total financing receivables	$	129,877		$	4,406		$	3,330		$	17,185		$	154,798		$	17,185
Percent of total financing receivables		83.9	%		2.8	%		2.2	%		11.1	%		100	%

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Revenues:
Income on financing leases	$ 9,920	$ 9,136	$ 19,555	$ 18,237
Rental income	2,402	2,073	4,719	4,079
Income on service contracts	85	103	170	211
Loss and damage waiver fees	1,321	1,220	2,608	2,421
Service fees and other	967	931	1,887	1,863
Total revenues	14,695	13,463	28,939	26,811
Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	4,025	4,037	8,381	7,990
Provision for credit losses	4,548	4,251	9,444	9,003
Depreciation and amortization	1,065	783	2,073	1,464
Interest	655	680	1,288	1,343
Total expenses	10,293	9,751	21,186	19,800
Income before provision for income taxes	4,402	3,712	7,753	7,011
Provision for income taxes	1,761	1,429	3,101	2,699
Net income	$ 2,641	$ 2,283	$ 4,652	$ 4,312
Net income per common share - basic	$ 0.18	$ 0.16	$ 0.33	$ 0.30
Net income per common share - diluted	$ 0.18	$ 0.16	$ 0.32	$ 0.30
Weighted-average shares:
Basic	14,297,524	14,231,692	14,290,806	14,239,180
Diluted	14,658,235	14,503,702	14,635,068	14,495,745

XML

Dividends

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Dividends Disclosure [Abstract]

Dividends

E. Dividends

Dividends declared and paid on a per share basis were as follows:

	2012
	Date Declared	Record Date	Payment Date	Dividend per Share
	January 31, 2012	February 10, 2012	February 15, 2012	$	0.06
	April 19, 2012	April 30, 2012	May 15, 2012		0.06
Total				$	0.12
	2011
	Date Declared	Record Date	Payment Date	Dividend per Share
	January 21, 2011	February 1, 2011	February 15, 2011	$	0.05
	April 21, 2011	May 2, 2011	May 13, 2011		0.05
Total				$	0.10

XML

Net Income Per Share

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Net Income Per Share [Abstract]

Net Income Per Share

D. Net Income Per Share

For the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, 0 and 409,305 options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because their effect would have been antidilutive. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, 0 and 434,167 options, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because their effect would have been antidilutive.

Net income per share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Net income	$	2,641	$	2,283	$	4,652	$	4,312
Weighted average common shares outstanding		14,297,524		14,231,692		14,290,806		14,239,180
Dilutive effect of common stock options, warrants and restricted stock		360,711		272,010		344,262		256,565
Shares used in computation of net income per common share - diluted		14,658,235		14,503,702		14,635,068		14,495,745
Net income per common share - basic	$	0.18	$	0.16	$	0.33	$	0.30
Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.18	$	0.16	$	0.32	$	0.30

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details Textual)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Textual) [Abstract]
Finance receivable charge-off	360 days past due or earlier
Description of internal risk ratings used to calculate provision for credit losses for subsidiary	reserve of 50% of the outstanding amount greater than 90 days plus 25% of the amount outstanding from 1 to 89 days
Percentage of receivable reserved for leases outstanding more than 90 days	50.00%
Percentage of receivable reserved for leases outstanding less than 89 days	25.00%

XML

Net Income Per Share (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Net Income Per Share [Abstract]

Net income per share

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Net income	$	2,641	$	2,283	$	4,652	$	4,312
Weighted average common shares outstanding		14,297,524		14,231,692		14,290,806		14,239,180
Dilutive effect of common stock options, warrants and restricted stock		360,711		272,010		344,262		256,565
Shares used in computation of net income per common share - diluted		14,658,235		14,503,702		14,635,068		14,495,745
Net income per common share - basic	$	0.18	$	0.16	$	0.33	$	0.30
Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.18	$	0.16	$	0.32	$	0.30

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

H. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. Although we do not expect that the outcome of any of these matters, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, litigation is inherently unpredictable. Therefore, judgments could be rendered, or settlements entered, that could adversely affect our operating results or cash flows in a particular period. We routinely assess all of our litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately incurring a liability, and record our best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where we access the likelihood of loss as probable.

Lease Commitments

We accept lease applications on a daily basis and, as a result, we have a pipeline of applications that have been approved, where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to lend does not become binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been completed, including the receipt of the lease, supporting documentation and verification with the lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is verified, we do not have any outstanding commitments to lend.

Stock Repurchases

On August 10, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program under which we are authorized to purchase up to 250,000 of our outstanding shares from time to time. The repurchases may take place in either the open market or through block trades. The repurchase program will be funded by our working capital and may be suspended or discontinued at anytime.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock under our stock buyback program. Since the program’s inception, we have repurchased a total of 86,295 shares of our common stock at a total cost of approximately $378,000.

XML

Revolving line of Credit

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Revolving line of credit [Abstract]

Revolving line of credit

F. Revolving line of credit

On August 2, 2007, we entered into a revolving line of credit with a bank syndicate led by Sovereign Bank (“Sovereign”) based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables. The total commitment under the facility was originally $30 million, and was subsequently increased to $60 million in July 2008, to $85 million in February 2009, and most recently to $100 million in July 2010. Outstanding borrowings are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security interest in all of our other assets.

In October 2011, the interest rate was lowered from Prime plus 1.25% or a London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 3.25% to Prime plus 0.75% or LIBOR plus 2.75%. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans, unless we elect LIBOR Loans. If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically converts to a Prime Rate Loan. As a part of the October 2011 amendment, the maturity date of the facility was extended to August 2, 2014. At our option upon maturity, the unpaid principal balance may be converted to a six-month term loan.

At June 30, 2012, $57.0 million of our loans were LIBOR loans and $11.5 million of our loans were Prime Rate Loans. The interest rate on our loans at June 30, 2012, was between 3.1% and 4.0%. The amount available on our revolving line of credit at June 30, 2012, was $31.5 million. The revolving line of credit has financial covenants that we must comply with to obtain funding and avoid an event of default. As of June 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all covenants under the revolving line of credit.

XML

Stock-Based Employee Compensation

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Stock-Based Employee Compensation [Abstract]

Stock-Based Employee Compensation

G. Stock-Based Employee Compensation

Under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, we reserved 1,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance, of which 61,251 shares are unissued as of June 30, 2012. In May 2012, our stockholders approved our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, for which we have 750,000 shares of common stock reserved and unissued as of June 30, 2012. The total potential future grants under the combined 2008 and 2012 plans are 811,251 shares.

In February 2012, the Compensation and Benefits Committee of our Board of Directors granted 40,393 restricted stock units to our executive officers under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. The restricted stock units were valued on the date of grant and the fair value of these awards was $6.60 per share. The issuance consists of two separate tranches where 25,165 shares of the restricted stock units vest over five years at 25% annually beginning on the second anniversary of the grant date and 15,228 shares of the restricted stock cliff vest after three years only if management achieves specific performance measures.

In February 2012, we granted our non-employee directors a total of 31,820 shares of stock with immediate vesting at a fair value of $6.60 per share, for a total grant date fair value of $210,000, in accordance with our director compensation policy.

The following table summarizes stock and restricted stock unit grant and vesting activity during the six months ended June 30, 2012:

	Stock Awards			Restricted Stock Units
	Number of Shares
Non-vested at December 31, 2011		—			66,562
Granted		31,820			40,393
Vested		(31,820	)		(8,380	)
Non-vested at June 30, 2012		—			98,575

During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012, compensation expense related to the restricted stock units was $29,000 and $52,000, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, compensation expense related to the restricted stock units was $12,000 and $22,000, respectively.

The following summarizes stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012:

	Shares			Price Per Share	Weighted- Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2011		818,028		$1.585 to $6.700	$	4.19
Granted		0		$0.000	$	0.00
Expired		(235,000	)	$6.700	$	6.70
Forfeited		0		$0.000	$	0.00
Outstanding at June 30, 2012		583,028		$1.585 to $5.850	$	3.17

Information relating to our outstanding stock options at June 30, 2012, is as follows:

Outstanding								Exercisable
Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted- Average Life (Years)		Intrinsic Value		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Shares		Intrinsic Value
	$1.585		150,000		0.41	$	977	$	1.585		150,000	$	977
	2.300		258,723		6.67		1,501		2.300		129,362		750
	5.770		31,923		4.67		74		5.770		31,923		74
	5.850		142,382		5.58		320		5.850		106,787		240
			583,028		4.68	$	2,872		3.220		418,072	$	2,041

We recognized total share-based compensation cost of $49,000 and $33,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the total share-based compensation cost recognized was $94,000 and $68,000, respectively.

XML

Subsequent Events

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

I. Subsequent Events

We have evaluated all events or transactions that occurred through the date on which we issued these financial statements. Other than the declaration of dividends we did not have any material subsequent events that impacted our consolidated financial statements.

On July 19, 2012, we declared a dividend of $0.06 payable on August 15, 2012, to shareholders of record on July 30, 2012.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended	6 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012 Commitments [Member]	Aug. 10, 2010 Commitments [Member]
Commitments and Contingencies (Textual) [Abstract]
Common stock repurchase authorized to purchase			250,000
Repurchased and retired under stock buyback program		0
Number of common stock repurchased		86,295
Cost of Common stock repurchase	$ 239	$ 378,000

XML

Stock-Based Employee Compensation (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Stock-Based Employee Compensation [Abstract]

Stock and restricted stock unit grant and vesting activity

	Stock Awards			Restricted Stock Units
	Number of Shares
Non-vested at December 31, 2011		—			66,562
Granted		31,820			40,393
Vested		(31,820	)		(8,380	)
Non-vested at June 30, 2012		—			98,575

Stock option activity

	Shares			Price Per Share	Weighted- Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2011		818,028		$1.585 to $6.700	$	4.19
Granted		0		$0.000	$	0.00
Expired		(235,000	)	$6.700	$	6.70
Forfeited		0		$0.000	$	0.00
Outstanding at June 30, 2012		583,028		$1.585 to $5.850	$	3.17

Outstanding stock options

Outstanding								Exercisable
Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted- Average Life (Years)		Intrinsic Value		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Shares		Intrinsic Value
	$1.585		150,000		0.41	$	977	$	1.585		150,000	$	977
	2.300		258,723		6.67		1,501		2.300		129,362		750
	5.770		31,923		4.67		74		5.770		31,923		74
	5.850		142,382		5.58		320		5.850		106,787		240
			583,028		4.68	$	2,872		3.220		418,072	$	2,041

XML

Net Income Per Share (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Net income per share
Net income	$ 2,641	$ 2,283	$ 4,652	$ 4,312	$ 8,991
Weighted average common shares outstanding	14,297,524	14,231,692	14,290,806	14,239,180
Dilutive effect of common stock options, warrants and restricted stock	360,711	272,010	344,262	256,565
Shares used in computation of net income per common share - diluted	14,658,235	14,503,702	14,635,068	14,495,745
Net income per common share - basic	$ 0.18	$ 0.16	$ 0.33	$ 0.30
Net income per common share - diluted	$ 0.18	$ 0.16	$ 0.32	$ 0.30

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	Total	Common Stock	Additional Paid-in Capital	Retained Earnings
Balance, Beginning at Dec. 31, 2010	$ 69,487	$ 142	$ 46,475	$ 22,870
Balance Beginning, Shares at Dec. 31, 2010		14,231,933
Stock issued for deferred compensation, Value	354	1	353
Stock issued for deferred compensation, Shares		77,274
Stock-based compensation	138		138
Stock repurchase program, Value	(239)		(239)
Stock repurchase program, Shares		(51,883)
Common stock dividends	(3,008)			(3,008)
Net income	8,991			8,991
Balance, Ending at Dec. 31, 2011	75,723	143	46,727	28,853
Balance Ending, Shares at Dec. 31, 2011		14,257,324
Stock issued for deferred compensation, Value	210		210
Stock issued for deferred compensation, Shares		31,820
Stock-based compensation	94		94
Shares issued upon vesting of restricted stock		8,380
Common stock dividends	(1,728)			(1,728)
Net income	4,652			4,652
Balance, Ending at Jun. 30, 2012	$ 78,951	$ 143	$ 47,031	$ 31,777
Balance Ending, Shares at Jun. 30, 2012		14,297,524

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality [Abstract]

Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality

C. Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality

The following table reconciles the activity in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Microticket equipment
	2012									2011
	LeaseComm			TimePayment			Total			LeaseComm			TimePayment			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	162		$	13,018		$	13,180		$	231		$	12,901		$	13,132
Charge-Offs		(332	)		(11,888	)		(12,220	)		(394	)		(11,339	)		(11,733	)
Recoveries		136			2,490			2,626			641			1,852			2,493
Provisions		160			9,284			9,444			(290	)		9,293			9,003
Ending balance, allowance for credit losses	$	126		$	12,904		$	13,030		$	188		$	12,707		$	12,895
Allowance for credit losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Collectively evaluated for impairment		126			12,904			13,030			188			12,707			12,895
Contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—			—			—			—			—			—
Ending balance, allowance for credit losses:	$	126		$	12,904		$	13,030		$	188		$	12,707		$	12,895
Financing Receivables (1):
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Collectively evaluated for impairment		288			168,069			168,357			415			154,383			154,798
Contracts acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—			—			—			—			—			—
Ending balance, financing receivables	$	288		$	168,069		$	168,357		$	415		$	154,383		$	154,798

(1) Total financing receivables include net investment in leases. For purposes of asset quality and allowance calculations, the allowance for credit losses is excluded.

The following table presents the aging status of the recorded investment in leases by our internally-developed proprietary scoring model as of June 30, 2012:

	Current			31 to 60 days Past Due			61 to 90 days Past Due			Over 90 Days Past Due			Total			Over 90 Days Accruing
LeaseComm	$	139		$	6		$	6		$	137		$	288		$	137
TimePayment Corp.
Gold		52,912			2,061			951			1,980			57,904			1,980
Silver		84,260			2,288			2,363			12,505			101,416			12,505
Bronze		6,315			354			320			1,760			8,749			1,760
TimePayment Corp. subtotal		143,487			4,703			3,634			16,245			168,069			16,245
Total financing receivables	$	143,626		$	4,709		$	3,640		$	16,382		$	168,357		$	16,382
Percent of total financing receivables		85.3	%		2.8	%		2.2	%		9.7	%		100	%

The following table presents the aging status of the recorded investment in leases by our internally-developed proprietary scoring model as of June 30, 2011:

	Current			31 to 60 days Past Due			61 to 90 days Past Due			Over 90 Days Past Due			Total			Over 90 Days Accruing
LeaseComm	$	183		$	11		$	8		$	213		$	415		$	213
TimePayment Corp.
Gold		45,456			1,372			540			1,713			49,081			1,713
Silver		79,753			2,762			2,488			13,351			98,354			13,351
Bronze		4,485			261			294			1,908			6,948			1,908
TimePayment Corp. subtotal		129,694			4,395			3,322			16,972			154,383			16,972
Total financing receivables	$	129,877		$	4,406		$	3,330		$	17,185		$	154,798		$	17,185
Percent of total financing receivables		83.9	%		2.8	%		2.2	%		11.1	%		100	%

XML

Net Income Per Share (Details Textual)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2011
Net Income Per Share (Textual) [Abstract]
Options excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share	0	409,305	0	434,167

XML

Dividends (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Dividends Disclosure [Abstract]

Dividend declared and paid on a per share basis

	2012
	Date Declared	Record Date	Payment Date	Dividend per Share
	January 31, 2012	February 10, 2012	February 15, 2012	$	0.06
	April 19, 2012	April 30, 2012	May 15, 2012		0.06
Total				$	0.12
	2011
	Date Declared	Record Date	Payment Date	Dividend per Share
	January 21, 2011	February 1, 2011	February 15, 2011	$	0.05
	April 21, 2011	May 2, 2011	May 13, 2011		0.05
Total				$	0.10