Commitments	6 Months Ended
Aug. 31, 2018
Commitments [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS	NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS Leases Our facilities consist of approximately 20,000 rented square feet in Stanton, California. The Stanton facility is currently being used for small quantity assembly and testing using components that are produced by various suppliers as well as for general offices, engineering and warehousing. The rent for the Stanton facility is $10,000 per month. The facility is not sufficient for our near term anticipated needs and the Company is actively looking for a new facility. The Company arrangements for the Stanton facility are on a month-per-month rent. Joint Venture In March 2017, the Company entered into a joint venture with a Chinese partner to form Jiangsu Shengfeng Mobile Power Technology Co., Ltd. (“Jiangsu Shengfeng”) to address the Chinese market. Under the Jiangsu Shengfeng joint venture agreement, Aura owns 49% of the venture and our Chinese partner owns 51%. The Chinese partner contributed approximately $9.25 million to the venture –– principally in the form of facilities and equipment as wells as approximately $500,000 in cash. The Company contributed to the venture in the form of $250,000 in cash as well as a limited license to the joint venture to manufacture, sell and service the AuraGen^® products within China. The limited license contributed to the Jiangsu Shengfeng joint venture, however, does not permit Jiangsu Shengfeng to manufacture the AuraGen^®rotor; rather, the joint venture is required to purchase all rotor subassemblies as well as certain software elements directly from the Company. Jiangsu Shengfeng’s board of directors consists of three members appointed by the Company and three appointed by our Chinese partner; Jiangsu Shengfeng’s CEO is appointed by our Chinese partner while its CFO and director for quality assurance and control are appointed by Aura. In addition, our Chinese partner invested $2,000,000 in Aura common stock at $1.40 per share for a total of 1,428,571 shares of common stock and is required to purchase a minimum of $1,250,000 of product from the Company supported by letters of credit for distribution until their factory is built, equipment installed, and staff hired and properly trained by Aura personnel. Aura has also committed to supply personnel for six months at no cost other than to reimburse for travel, room and board. This commitment has been fulfilled and Aura is under no further obligation to supply personnel at no cost. The agreement was subject to the approval of the Chinese Government which was received in April 2017. Contingencies We are subject to the legal proceedings and claims discussed below as well as certain other legal proceedings and claims that have not been fully resolved and that have arisen in the ordinary course of business. Our management evaluates our exposure to these claims and proceedings individually and in the aggregate and evaluates potential losses on such litigation if the amount of the loss is estimable and the loss is probable. In June 2016, the Company becameone of several defendants named in a lawsuit filed by two of seven secured creditors demanding repayment of loans totaling $125,000 plus accrued interest and exemplary damages. The Company entered into an amended agreement with the five other secured creditors representing in excess of 95% of the total secured debt.In August 2018 the two secured creditors who brought suit against the Company were awarded approximately $240,000 at trial. The Company intends to appeal this award. The Company is presently engaged in a dispute with one of its former directors, Robert Kopple, relating to approximately $5.4 million and approximately 3.14 million warrants which Mr. Kopple claims to be owed to him and his affiliates by the Company. In July 2017, Mr. Kopple filed suit against the Company as well as against Mr. Gagerman (currently not a director) and director Mr. Diaz-Verson, Jr. together with former directors Mr. Breslow and Mr. Howsmon in connection with these allegations. Mssrs. Diaz-Verson, Jr., Breslow and Howsmon have each been dismissed from this suit.The Company believes that it has valid defenses in these matters and intends to vigorously defend against these claims. In April 2018, the Company filed suit against its former counsel, Kilpatrick Townsend &Stockton LLP relating to various acts of malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty committed by the firm in connection with its representation of Aura. In June 2018, Kilpatrick Townsend &Stockton LLP filed a cross-complaint against the Company claiming approximately $400,000 in allegedly unpaid legal fees. The Company believes that it has valid defenses to these claims and intends to vigorously defend against these claims. The Company has a dispute with its former landlord and vacated its former premises prior to the end of its lease. The premises have been released to a third party and no action has been filed against the Company, nor does the Company believe it has any liability. Further while the Company believes it has claims against the landlord based on their actions, the Company has nonetheless elected to accrue the amount due for unpaid rent.

NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS

Leases

Our facilities consist of approximately 20,000 rented square feet in Stanton, California. The Stanton facility is currently being used for small quantity assembly and testing using components that are produced by various suppliers as well as for general offices, engineering and warehousing. The rent for the Stanton facility is $10,000 per month. The facility is not sufficient for our near term anticipated needs and the Company is actively looking for a new facility. The Company arrangements for the Stanton facility are on a month-per-month rent.

Joint Venture

In March 2017, the Company entered into a joint venture with a Chinese partner to form Jiangsu Shengfeng Mobile Power Technology Co., Ltd. (“Jiangsu Shengfeng”) to address the Chinese market. Under the Jiangsu Shengfeng joint venture agreement, Aura owns 49% of the venture and our Chinese partner owns 51%. The Chinese partner contributed approximately $9.25 million to the venture –– principally in the form of facilities and equipment as wells as approximately $500,000 in cash. The Company contributed to the venture in the form of $250,000 in cash as well as a limited license to the joint venture to manufacture, sell and service the AuraGen^® products within China. The limited license contributed to the Jiangsu Shengfeng joint venture, however, does not permit Jiangsu Shengfeng to manufacture the AuraGen^®rotor; rather, the joint venture is required to purchase all rotor subassemblies as well as certain software elements directly from the Company. Jiangsu Shengfeng’s board of directors consists of three members appointed by the Company and three appointed by our Chinese partner; Jiangsu Shengfeng’s CEO is appointed by our Chinese partner while its CFO and director for quality assurance and control are appointed by Aura.

In addition, our Chinese partner invested $2,000,000 in Aura common stock at $1.40 per share for a total of 1,428,571 shares of common stock and is required to purchase a minimum of $1,250,000 of product from the Company supported by letters of credit for distribution until their factory is built, equipment installed, and staff hired and properly trained by Aura personnel. Aura has also committed to supply personnel for six months at no cost other than to reimburse for travel, room and board. This commitment has been fulfilled and Aura is under no further obligation to supply personnel at no cost. The agreement was subject to the approval of the Chinese Government which was received in April 2017.

Contingencies

We are subject to the legal proceedings and claims discussed below as well as certain other legal proceedings and claims that have not been fully resolved and that have arisen in the ordinary course of business. Our management evaluates our exposure to these claims and proceedings individually and in the aggregate and evaluates potential losses on such litigation if the amount of the loss is estimable and the loss is probable.

In June 2016, the Company becameone of several defendants named in a lawsuit filed by two of seven secured creditors demanding repayment of loans totaling $125,000 plus accrued interest and exemplary damages. The Company entered into an amended agreement with the five other secured creditors representing in excess of 95% of the total secured debt.In August 2018 the two secured creditors who brought suit against the Company were awarded approximately $240,000 at trial. The Company intends to appeal this award.

The Company is presently engaged in a dispute with one of its former directors, Robert Kopple, relating to approximately $5.4 million and approximately 3.14 million warrants which Mr. Kopple claims to be owed to him and his affiliates by the Company. In July 2017, Mr. Kopple filed suit against the Company as well as against Mr. Gagerman (currently not a director) and director Mr. Diaz-Verson, Jr. together with former directors Mr. Breslow and Mr. Howsmon in connection with these allegations. Mssrs. Diaz-Verson, Jr., Breslow and Howsmon have each been dismissed from this suit.The Company believes that it has valid defenses in these matters and intends to vigorously defend against these claims.

In April 2018, the Company filed suit against its former counsel, Kilpatrick Townsend &Stockton LLP relating to various acts of malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty committed by the firm in connection with its representation of Aura. In June 2018, Kilpatrick Townsend &Stockton LLP filed a cross-complaint against the Company claiming approximately $400,000 in allegedly unpaid legal fees. The Company believes that it has valid defenses to these claims and intends to vigorously defend against these claims.

The Company has a dispute with its former landlord and vacated its former premises prior to the end of its lease. The premises have been released to a third party and no action has been filed against the Company, nor does the Company believe it has any liability. Further while the Company believes it has claims against the landlord based on their actions, the Company has nonetheless elected to accrue the amount due for unpaid rent.