XML 42 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
 
 
Contract or Notional Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
2015
 
2014
Commitments to fund:
 
 
 
Revolving, open ended home equity loans
$
110,473

 
$
100,897

1-4 family residential construction loans
6,153

 
2,463

Commercial real estate, construction and land development loans
14,174

 
11,682

Commercial, industrial and other loans
84,480

 
71,483

Standby letters of credit
6,510

 
7,309


Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, residential real estate, and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The Company holds collateral supporting those commitments when deemed necessary by management. The current amount of liability, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued was not material.
The Company currently maintains a reserve in other liabilities totaling $472,000 and $485,000 at December 31, 2015 and 2014 for off-balance sheet credit exposures that currently are not funded, based on historical loss experience of the related loan class. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, ($13,000), ($44,000) and $(54,000) was charged to other noninterest expense for this exposure.
The Company has sold loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago as part of its Mortgage Partnership Finance Program (“MPF Program”). Under the terms of the MPF Program, there is limited recourse back to the Company for loans that do not perform in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. Each loan that is sold under the program is “credit enhanced” such that the individual loan’s rating is raised to “AA,” as determined by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago. The total outstanding balance of loans sold under the MPF Program was $44,124,000 and $51,773,000 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, with limited recourse back to the Company on these loans of $8,230,000 and $8,508,000 at December 31, 2015 and 2014. Many of the loans sold under the MPF Program have primary mortgage insurance, which reduces the Company’s overall exposure. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, the Company foreclosed or is in the process of foreclosing on loans sold under the MPF program, with a resulting charge of $127,000, $71,000 and $20,000 to other expenses representing an estimate of the Company’s losses under its recourse exposure.