XML 25 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
ACCOUNTING POLICIES  
Basis of Presentation

(A) Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations (s-x) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all the information necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position and results of operations, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

 

It is management's opinion, however that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statements presentation. The results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated December 31, 2012 financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s SEC Form 10-K.

 

B4MC Gold Mines, Inc. (formerly known as Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc.) (an exploration stage company) was organized under the laws of the State of Delaware on April 2, 1987.  In June 2000, the Company changed its domicile from Delaware to Nevada.  The Company attempted to sell franchises for the retail sale of its Chicago style hot dogs. The Company discontinued these operations during 1990 and had been inactive since that time until its acquisition of Trapper’s Pizza, Inc. on July 1, 2002. In March 2003, the Company rescinded the acquisition of Trapper’s Pizza, Inc.  During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company decided to redirect its business focus toward precious metal mineral acquisition and exploration.

 

Activities during the exploration stage are anticipated to include developing the business plan and raising capital.

 

The Company is in the exploration stage in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic No. 915 and SEC Industry Guide No. 7 addressing issues in mining operations.

 

On October 10, 2013, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to B4MC Gold Mines, Inc.

Use of Estimates

(B) Use of Estimates

 

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and expenses during the reported

period. Significant estimates include valuation of in kind contribution of interest and services and the valuation of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

(C) Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had $0 and $0 in cash equivalents.

Exploration and Development Costs

(D) Exploration and Development Costs

 

Costs of acquiring mining properties and any exploration and development costs are expensed as incurred unless proven and probable reserves exist and the property is a commercially mineable property in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 930, Extractive Activities- Mining. Mine development costs incurred either to develop new gold and silver deposits, expand the capacity of operating mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are capitalized. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment. The Company intends to evaluate, at least annually, the carrying value of capitalized mining costs and related property, plant and equipment costs, if any, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value.

 

The Company capitalizes costs for mining properties by individual property and defers such costs for later amortization only if the prospects for economic productions are reasonably certain.

 

Capitalized costs are expensed in the period when the determination has been made that economic production does not appear reasonably certain.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded exploration costs of $0 and $0, respectively.

Property and Equipment Policy

(E) Property and Equipment

 

The Company values property and equipment at cost and depreciates these assets using the straight-line method over their expected useful life. The Company uses a three year life for equipment, its only category of depreciable property and equipment. The property has not yet been placed in service, so no depreciation has been recorded.

 

In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, the Company carries long-lived assets at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value. Impairment is evaluated by estimating future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flow is less than the carrying amount of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair value, for purposes of calculating impairment, is measured based on estimated future cash flows, discounted at a market rate of interest.

 

There were no impairment losses recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Loss Per Share Policy

(F) Loss Per Share

 

The following data show the amounts used in computing loss per share and the effect on income and the weighted average number of shares of dilutive potential common stock for the periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Three Months

Ended September 30,

 

For the Nine Months

Ended September 30,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

Loss from continuing operations available

to common stockholders (numerator)

$

(154,455)

$

(3,404)

$

(163,746)

$

(13,367)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common

shares outstanding  used in loss per share

during the period (denominator)

 

18,030,659

 

2,248,050

 

7,566,731

 

2,248,050

 

Dilutive loss per share was not presented, as the Company had no common equivalent shares for all periods presented that would affect the computation of diluted loss per share.

Revenue Recognition

(G) Revenue Recognition

 

The Company recognizes revenue on arrangements in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 605, Revenue Recognition. In all cases, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company has not yet entered into any contractual obligation to deliver ore product or finished metals.

Income Taxes Policy

(H) Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”). Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Stock-Based Compensation Policy

(I) Stock-Based Compensation

 

In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. Under FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans. As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value. Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant. The Company applies this statement prospectively.

 

Equity instruments (“instruments”) issued to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718. FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 505, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees defines the measurement date and recognition period for such instruments. In general, the measurement date is when either a (a) performance commitment, as defined, is reached or (b) the earlier of (i) the non-employee performance is complete or (ii) the instruments are vested. The measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular grant as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Business Segments

(J) Business Segments

 

The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

(K) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for prepaids, accounts payable and accrued expenses, accounts payable-related party, notes payable-related party and loans payable – related party approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. There are no assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

(L) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In February 2013, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This guidance requires an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this guidance is fixed at the reporting date. This stipulates that (1) it will include the amount the entity agreed to pay for the arrangement between them and the other entities that are also obligated to the liability and (2) any additional amount the entity expects to pay on behalf of the other entities. The objective of this update is to provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal periods (and interim reporting periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2013. This standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s reported results of operations or financial position.

 

In February 2013, FASB issued Accounting standards update 2013-02, Comprehensive Income Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This update requires an entity to provide information about the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. The entity is also required to disclose significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting periods. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other discourses required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The objective in this Update is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments in this update should be applied prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. This standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s reported results of operations or financial position.