XML 51 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
  7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:

 

We review goodwill and trademarks with indefinite lives for impairment at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. When testing goodwill for impairment the Company performs a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of a reporting unit in the first step of the goodwill impairment test. If we determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not less than the carrying amount, the two-step impairment test is performed. Otherwise, further testing is not needed. No triggering events have been identified in 2012. The following table presents our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.

 

          Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2012  
          Quoted Prices in     Significant Other     Significant  
          Active Markets for     Observable     Unobservable  
          Identical Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
    Total     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
Description                                
Trademark - Nickel   $ 2,261     $ -     $ -     $ 2,261  
                                 
Goodwill   $ 2,761     $ -     $ -     $ 2,761  

 

          Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011  
          Quoted Prices in     Significant Other     Significant  
          Active Markets for     Observable     Unobservable  
          Identical Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
    Total     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
Description                                
Trademark - Nickel   $ 2,263     $ -     $ -     $ 2,263  
                                 
Goodwill   $ 2,763     $ -     $ -     $ 2,763  

 

Goodwill relates to our Nickel skin care business, which is primarily a component of our European operations. Testing goodwill for impairment requires us to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit using significant estimates and assumptions. The assumptions we make will impact the outcome and ultimate results of the testing. In making our assumptions and estimates, we use industry accepted valuation models and set criteria that are reviewed and approved by management. We have determined that we may be inclined to sell the Nickel business within the next few years and therefore, we engaged a third party valuation specialist to advise us and assist in a potential transaction. As a result, the Company has determined that as of December 31, 2011, the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeded fair value resulting in an impairment loss of $0.8 million. We expect Nickel brand sales to remain steady over the next few years as the result of new product initiatives. In estimating future sales, we use our internal budgets developed from recent sales data for existing products and planned timing of new product launches. If sales for the reporting unit decreased 10%, we could incur an additional goodwill impairment charge of $0.5 million.

 

To determine fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets, we use an income approach, including the relief-from-royalty method. This method assumes that, in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to obtain the rights to use the comparable asset. The relief-from-royalty calculations require us to make a number of assumptions and estimates concerning future sales levels, market royalty rates, future tax rates and discount rates. We use this method to determine if an impairment charge is required relating to our Nickel brand trademarks. No impairment charges have been required since 2009. We assumed a market royalty rate of 6% and a discount rate of 7.7%.

 

The following table presents the impact a change in the following significant assumptions would have had on the calculated fair value in 2011 assuming all other assumptions remained constant:

 

          Increase (decrease)  
In thousands   Change     to fair value  
             
Weighted average cost of capital     +10 %   $ (272 )
Weighted average cost of capital     -10 %   $ 365  
Future sales levels     +10 %   $ 273  
Future sales levels     -10 %   $ (273 )