-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, DF8mFjE2/xYuFCNnqPgC+uMdkNO6LTSsD7YIGMP9iRYSxvh5aVVj+DzmpObbNhqe c2XFcJb2LgMrWo09wi1ksg== 0000891618-98-003989.txt : 19980820 0000891618-98-003989.hdr.sgml : 19980820 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000891618-98-003989 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 8-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19980810 ITEM INFORMATION: FILED AS OF DATE: 19980819 SROS: NYSE FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: RAYCHEM CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000082206 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: ELECTRIC LIGHTING & WIRING EQUIPMENT [3640] IRS NUMBER: 941369731 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 0630 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 8-K SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-08341 FILM NUMBER: 98694597 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 300 CONSTITUTION DR STREET 2: MS 120/8502 CITY: MENLO PARK STATE: CA ZIP: 94025-1164 BUSINESS PHONE: 4153613333 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 300 CONSTITUTION DRIVE STREET 2: MS 120/8502 CITY: MENLO PARK STATE: CA ZIP: 94025-1164 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: RAYTHERM CORP DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19720526 8-K 1 FORM 8-K 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 -------------------- FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported) August 10, 1998 ----------------- Raychem Corporation - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) Delaware 2-15299 94-1369731 - ---------------------------- --------------------- ------------------- (State or other jurisdiction (Commission File No.) (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation) Identification No.) 300 Constitution Drive Menlo Park, California 94025 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices and zip code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (650) 361-3333 ---------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Former Name or Former Address, if changed since last Report) 2 Item 5. Other Events. The following disclosure is being made by Raychem Corporation (the "Company") with respect to the lawsuit entitled Bourns, Inc. v. Raychem Corporation reported in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1997. On December 19, 1994, the Company filed a complaint entitled Raychem Corporation and Thermacon, Inc. v. Steven D. Hogge, Bourns, Inc., et al. in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo, which alleged, among other claims, misappropriation of trade secrets. On May 2, 1995, a complaint entitled Bourns, Inc. v. Raychem Corporation was filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California, alleging antitrust law violations. Many of the claims asserted in the Company's state action were consolidated with Bourns' federal action against the Company. On March 9, 1998, this case was transferred from the Eastern Division of the Central District to the Western Division of the Central District and reassigned to a new judge. The trial for Bourns' action against the Company commenced on June 16, 1998. During the sixth week of the trial, due to the length of the proceeding, the judge bifurcated the Company's trade secret claims against Bourns for trial at a later date. On August 10, 1998, the trial of Bourns' action against the Company ended with a jury verdict that awarded Bourns $64 million in damages. Legal fees and expenses, including attorneys fees, are also recoverable by Bourns under applicable U.S. antitrust law. The Company intends to file motions with the court to set aside the jury's verdict, to reduce the damages and to ask for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict is contrary to the evidence presented at trial and is incorrect as a matter of law and that the jury's damage award bears no relationship to the market segment to which the verdict was directed. If necessary, the Company intends to appeal this decision. Under applicable U.S. antitrust law, any remaining damage award against the Company will be trebled. The Company also intends to continue with its theft of trade secrets case against Bourns. The new trial date for the Company's trade secret claims has not been set by the court. [REST OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 3 SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized. RAYCHEM CORPORATION By: /s/ KAREN O. COTTLE ------------------------------- Karen O. Cottle, Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Date: August 19, 1998 -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----