10-K

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     .

Commission file number: 001-07982

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

South Dakota
(State of incorporation) 46-0246171
(IRS Employer Identification No.)

205 E. 6th Street, P.O. Box 5107
Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57117- 5107
(Address of principal executive offices)

(605) 336-2750
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class:	Name of Each Exchange on which Registered
Common Stock, $1 par value	The NASDAQ Stock Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes þ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes þ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety days. þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). o Yes þ No

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates at July 31, 2009 was approximately $463,005,964. The aggregate market value was computed by reference to the closing price as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, $28.70, on July 31, 2009, which was as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. The number of shares outstanding on March 25, 2010 was 18,029,733.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders is incorporated by reference into Parts I, II, and III to the extent described therein. The definitive proxy statement relating to the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be held May 25, 2010, is incorporated by reference into Part III to the extent described therein.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
PART I
Item 1. Business		2
Item 1A. Risk Factors		5
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments		7
Item 2. Properties		7
Item 3. Legal Proceedings		8
Item 4. Reserved		8
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		8
Item 6. Selected Financial Data		8
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		8
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		8
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		8
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		8
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures		9
Item 9B. Other Information		9
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance		9
Item 11. Executive Compensation		10
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters		10
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		10
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services		10
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule		10
Signatures		12
EX-13
EX-21
EX-23
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

1

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2010

Item 1. Business

General

Raven Industries, Inc. was incorporated in February 1956 under the laws of the State of South Dakota and began operations later that same year. Raven is an industrial manufacturer providing a variety of products. The company markets its products around the world and has its principal operations in the United States of America. Raven began operations as a manufacturer of high-altitude research balloons before diversifying into the industrial, agricultural, construction and military/aerospace markets. The company employs approximately 925 persons on active status and is headquartered at 205 E. Sixth Street, Sioux Falls, SD 57104 — telephone (605) 336-2750. The company’s Internet address is http://www.ravenind.com and its common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol RAVN. The company has adopted a Code of Conduct applicable to all officers, directors, and employees and which is available on the website. Information on the company’s website is not part of this filing.

All reports (including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K) and proxy and information statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are available through a link from the company’s website to the SEC website. All such information is available as soon as reasonably practicable after it has been electronically filed. Filings can also be obtained free of charge by contacting the company, the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549, through its website at http://www.sec.gov, or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

The company has four business segments consisting of three Raven divisions and one subsidiary: Applied Technology Division (formerly known as the Flow Controls Division), Engineered Films Division, Electronic Systems Division and Aerostar International, Inc. (Aerostar). Many of the past and present product lines are an extension of technology and production methods developed in the original balloon business. Product lines have been grouped in these segments based on common technologies, production methods and raw materials; however, more than one business segment may serve each of the product markets identified above. Note 13 on pages 44-45 of the company’s Annual Report to Shareholders, incorporated herein by reference, provides financial information concerning the business segments.

Following is a summary of company net sales by principal product categories (dollars in thousands):

	FY 2010		FY 2009		FY 2008
Pit lining and geomembrane films	$	26,834	$	40,205	$	32,967
Other plastic films		36,739		49,443		51,283
Agricultural precision control devices and accessories		83,236		99,428		58,335
Electronics manufacturing services		60,749		60,006		67,231
Parachute-related products		10,298		8,660		2,206
Uniforms and protective wear		5,434		9,976		5,842
Other		14,492		12,195		16,093
Total sales	$	237,782	$	279,913	$	233,957

Business Segments

Applied Technology

Effective February 1, 2009, the company’s Flow Controls segment changed its name to Applied Technology. Products in this segment are electronic and Global Positioning System (GPS) devices. They are used primarily on agricultural sprayers for precision farming applications. The company has developed products for field location control, chemical injection and automated steering. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, Raven invested in Site-Specific Technology Development Group, Inc., a software company, and purchased the assets of Ranchview, Inc., a developer of GPS signal correction and wireless internet connectivity via cell phone networks. These investments are expected to position Applied Technology with tools to improve grower decision making along with the hardware to execute these decisions in the field.

Home office personnel sell the agricultural control products in this segment to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and independent third-party distributors. The segment also markets using precision agriculture representatives on location in key geographic areas, including Canada, Europe and Ukraine. The company’s competitive advantage in this segment is product reliability, ease of use, product availability and service after the sale.

2

Engineered Films

This segment produces rugged reinforced plastic sheeting for industrial, construction and agricultural applications.

The company’s sales force sells plastic sheeting to independent third-party distributors in each of the various markets it serves. The company extrudes a significant portion of the film converted for its commercial products and believes it is one of the largest sheeting converters in the United States. Engineered Films believes its ability to both extrude and convert films allows it to provide a more customized solution to customer needs. A number of suppliers of sheeting compete with Raven on both price and product availability. Engineered Films is the company’s most capital-intensive business segment, requiring regular investments in new extrusion capacity along with printers and conversion equipment. This segment’s capital expenditures were $1.5 million in fiscal 2010, $3.1 million in fiscal 2009, $4.0 million in fiscal 2008 and $13.3 million in fiscal 2007.

Electronic Systems

The company has focused this segment’s capabilities in electronics manufacturing services (EMS) for commercial customers with a focus on high-mix, low-volume production. Assemblies manufactured by the Electronic Systems segment include avionics, secure communication, environmental controls and other products where high quality is critical.

EMS sales are made in response to competitive bid requests by customers. The level and nature of competition varies with the type of product, but the company frequently competes with a number of EMS manufacturers on any given bid request. The markets in which the company participates are highly competitive, with customers having many suppliers to choose from.

Aerostar

Aerostar sells high-altitude and tethered aerostats for government and commercial research and military parachutes. It produces uniforms and protective wear for U.S. government agencies as a subcontractor and also manufactures other sewn and sealed products on a contract basis.

Sales are made in response to competitive bid requests. High-altitude research balloons are sold directly to government agencies (usually funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration) or commercial users. Aerostar is the only balloon supplier for high-altitude research in the United States.

Major Customer Information

Sales in fiscal 2010 and 2009 to Goodrich Corporation, a customer of the Electronic Systems segment, accounted for 16% and 13%, respectively, of consolidated sales. At January 31, 2010, Goodrich Corporation accounted for 13% of the company’s consolidated accounts receivable. The loss of this account would adversely affect profitability; however, the company believes its relationship with this customer is strong.

Seasonal Working Capital Requirements

Some seasonal demand exists in Applied Technology’s agricultural market. The Applied Technology Division builds product in the fall for winter/spring delivery. Certain sales to agricultural customers offer spring dating terms for fall and early winter shipments. The resulting fluctuations in inventory and accounts receivable balances have required and may require, seasonal short-term financing.

Financial Instruments

The principal financial instruments the company maintains are cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and accounts receivable. The company manages the interest rate, credit and market risks associated with these accounts through periodic reviews of the carrying value of assets and liabilities and establishment of appropriate allowances in connection with the company policies. The company does not use off-balance sheet financing, except to enter into operating leases as described in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements located on page 43 of the 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders incorporated herein by reference. As discussed in Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, the company uses derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency risk. The use of these financial instruments has had no material effect on consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

3

Raw Materials

The company obtains a wide variety of materials from numerous vendors. Principal materials include numerous electronic components for the Electronic Systems and Applied Technology segments, various plastic resins for the Engineered Films segment and fabrics for the Aerostar segment. The Engineered Films segment has experienced volatile resin prices over the past three years. Price increases could not always be passed on to customers due to weak demand and a competitive pricing environment. With the exception of plastic resin price volatility, the company has not experienced any significant shortages or other problems in purchasing raw materials to date, and alternative sources of supply are generally available. The Electronic Systems segment has recently experienced longer lead times for components. However, predicting future material shortages and the related potential impact on Raven is not possible.

Patents

The company owns a number of patents. However, Raven does not believe that its business, as a whole, is materially dependent on any one patent or related group of patents. It believes the successful manufacture and sale of its products generally depend more upon its technical expertise and manufacturing skills.

Research and Development

The business segments conduct ongoing research and development efforts. Most of the company’s research and development expenditures are directed toward new products in the Applied Technology segment. Total company research and development costs are presented on the Consolidated Statements of Income on page 34 of the 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders incorporated herein by reference.

Environmental Matters

Except as described below, the company believes that, in all material respects, it is in compliance with applicable federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Expenditures relating to compliance for operating facilities incurred in the past have not significantly affected the company’s capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

In connection with the sale of substantially all of the assets of the company’s Glasstite, Inc. subsidiary in fiscal 2000, the company has agreed to assume responsibility for the investigation and remediation of any pre-October 29, 1999 environmental contamination at the company’s former Glasstite pickup-truck topper facility in Dunnell, Minnesota as required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) or the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The company and the purchasers of the company’s Glasstite subsidiary conducted environmental assessments of the properties. Although these assessments continue to be evaluated by the MPCA on the basis of the data available, there is no reason to believe that any activities which might be required as a result of the findings of the assessments will have a material effect on the company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows. The company had $83,000 accrued at January 31, 2010, its best estimate of probable costs to be incurred related to these matters.

Backlog

As of February 1, 2010, the company’s order backlog totaled $74.7 million. Backlog amounts as of February 1, 2009 and 2008 were $80.4 million and $66.6 million, respectively. Because the length of time between order and shipment varies considerably by business segment and customers can change delivery schedules or potentially cancel orders, the company does not believe that backlog, as of any particular date, is necessarily indicative of actual net sales for any future period.

Employees

As of January 31, 2010, the company had approximately 955 employees, 925 in an active status. Following is a summary of active employees by segment: Electronic Systems — 220; Applied Technology — 300; Engineered Films — 135; Aerostar — 220; Administration — 50. Management believes its employee relations are satisfactory.

4

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements regarding the expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The company intends that all forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Although the company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance that such assumptions are correct or that these expectations will be achieved. Such assumptions involve important risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect results in the future. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to weather conditions and commodity prices, which could affect certain of the company’s primary markets, such as agriculture and construction and oil and gas well drilling; or changes in competition, raw material availability, technology or relationships with the company’s largest customers any of which could adversely impact any of the company’s product lines, as well as other risks described below. The foregoing list is not exhaustive and the company disclaims any obligation to subsequently revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Risks Relating to the Company

The company operates in markets that involve significant risks, many of which are beyond the company’s control. Based on current information, the company believes that the following identifies the most significant risk factors that could affect its businesses. However, the risks and uncertainties the company faces are not limited to those discussed below. There could be other unknown or unpredictable economic, business, competitive or regulatory factors, including factors that the company currently believes to be immaterial, that could have material adverse effects on the company’s financial position, liquidity and results of operations. Past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

Weather conditions could affect certain of the company’s markets such as agriculture and construction.

The company’s Applied Technology Division is largely dependent on the ability of farmers and agricultural subcontractors known as custom operators to purchase agricultural equipment that includes its products. If such farmers experience adverse weather conditions resulting in poor growing conditions, or experience unfavorable crop prices or expenses, potential buyers may be less likely to purchase agricultural equipment. Accordingly, poor weather conditions may adversely affect sales in the Applied Technology Division.

Poor weather conditions can also adversely affect sales in the company’s Engineered Films Division. To the extent weather conditions curtail construction activity, sales of the segment’s plastic sheeting will likely decrease.

Price fluctuations in and shortages of raw materials could have a significant impact on the company’s ability to sustain and grow earnings.

The company’s Engineered Films Division (EFD) consumes significant amounts of plastic resin, the costs of which primarily reflect market prices for natural gas. These prices are subject to worldwide supply and demand as well as other factors beyond the control of the company. Although EFD is sometimes able to pass such price increases to its customers, significant variations in the cost of plastic resins can affect the company’s operating results from period to period. Unusual supply disruptions, such as caused by a natural disaster, could cause suppliers to invoke “force majure” clauses in their supply agreements, causing shortages of material. Success in offsetting higher raw material costs with price increases is largely influenced by competitive and economic conditions and could vary significantly depending on the market served. If the company is not able to fully offset the effects of material availability and costs, financial results could be adversely affected.

Electronic components, used by both the Applied Technology Division and Electronic Systems Division, are sometimes in short supply, impacting their ability to meet customer demand.

If a supplier of raw materials or components were unable to deliver due to shortage or financial difficulty, any of the company’s segments could be adversely affected.

5

Fluctuations in commodity prices can increase our costs and decrease our sales.

Agricultural income levels are affected by agricultural commodity prices and input costs. As a result, changes in commodity prices that reduce agricultural income levels could have a negative effect on the ability of growers and their contractors to purchase the company’s precision agriculture products manufactured by its Applied Technology Division.

Exploration for oil and natural gas fluctuates with their price. Plastic sheeting manufactured and sold by our Engineered Films Division is sold as pit and pond liners to contain water used in the drilling process. Lower prices for oil and natural gas could reduce exploration activities and demand for our products. Plastic sheeting manufacture uses plastic resins which are subject to change in price as the cost of natural gas changes. Accordingly, volatility in oil and natural gas prices may negatively affect our cost of goods sold or cause us to change prices, which could adversely affect our sales and profitability.

Failure to develop and market new technologies and products could impact the company’s competitive position and have an adverse effect on the company’s financial results.

The company’s operating results in its Applied Technology and to a lesser extent, it’s Engineered Films and Aerostar segments, are largely dependent on the ability to renew the pipeline of new products and to bring those products to market. This ability could be adversely affected by difficulties or delays in product development such as the inability to identify viable new products, successfully complete research and development, obtain relevant regulatory approvals, obtain intellectual property protection, or gain market acceptance of new products and services. Because of the lengthy development process, technological challenges and intense competition, there can be no assurance that any of the products the company is currently developing, or could begin to develop in the future, will achieve substantial commercial success. In addition, sales of the company’s new products could replace sales of some of its current products, offsetting the benefit of even a successful product introduction.

The company’s Electronic Systems Division is dependent on a small number of customers and faces competitive risks.

The company’s Electronic Systems Division (ESD) is dependent on a small number of customers with the top customer representing over half of ESD sales. Accordingly, the ESD segment is dependent on the continued growth, viability and financial stability of its customers, which consist of original equipment manufacturers of avionics, consumer beds and secure telecommunication equipment. Future sales are dependent on the success of the company’s customers, some of which operate in businesses associated with rapid technological change and consequent product obsolescence. Developments adverse to major customers or their products, or the failure of a major customer to pay for components or services, could have an adverse effect on the performance of ESD.

Further, ESD competes against many providers of electronics manufacturing services. Certain competitors have substantially greater resources and more geographically diversified international operations than ESD. This segment may also be at a competitive disadvantage with respect to price when compared to manufacturers with lower cost structures, particularly those with more offshore facilities located where labor and other costs are lower. The company also faces competition from the manufacturing operations of current and future customers, who are continually evaluating the merits of manufacturing products internally against the advantages of outsourcing to electronics manufacturing services providers. Accordingly, to compete effectively, ESD must continue to provide technologically advanced manufacturing services, maintain strict quality standards, respond flexibly and rapidly to customers’ design and schedule changes and deliver products globally on a reliable basis at competitive prices. Customers may cancel their orders, change production quantities or delay production. Start-up costs and inefficiencies related to new or transferred programs can adversely affect operating results and such costs may not be recoverable if such new programs or transferred programs are cancelled.

The company’s Aerostar segment depends on the U.S. government for a significant portion of its sales, creating uncertainty in the timing of and funding for projected contracts.

A significant portion of Aerostar’s sales are to the U.S. government or U.S. government agencies as a prime or sub-contractor. Government spending has historically been cyclical. A decrease in U.S. government defense or near-space research spending or changes in spending allocation could result in one or more of the company’s programs being reduced, delayed or terminated. Reductions in the company’s existing programs, unless offset by other programs and opportunities, could adversely affect its ability to sustain and grow its future sales and earnings. The company’s U.S. government sales are funded by the federal budget, which operates on an October-to-September fiscal year. Changes in congressional schedules, negotiations for program funding levels or unforeseen world events can interrupt the funding for a program or contract. Funds for multi-year contracts can be changed in subsequent years in the appropriations process.

In addition, the U.S. government has increasingly relied on indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts and other procurement vehicles that are subject to a competitive bidding and funding process even after the award of the basic contract, adding an additional element of uncertainty to future funding levels. Delays in the funding process or changes in funding can impact the

6

timing of available funds or can lead to changes in program content or termination at the government’s convenience. The loss of anticipated funding or the termination of multiple or large programs could have an adverse effect on the company’s future sales and earnings.

The company derives a portion of its revenues from foreign markets, which subjects the company to risk of changes in government policies and laws or worldwide economic conditions.

The company’s sales outside the U.S. were $20 million in fiscal 2010. The company’s financial results could be affected by changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies, laws and regulations, or other activities of U.S. and non-U.S. governments, agencies and similar organizations. These conditions include, but are not limited to, changes in a country’s or region’s economic or political conditions; trade regulations affecting production, pricing and marketing of products; local labor conditions and regulations; reduced protection of intellectual property rights in some countries; changes in the regulatory or legal environment; restrictions on currency exchange activities; burdensome taxes and tariffs and other trade barriers. International risks and uncertainties, including changing social and economic conditions as well as terrorism, political hostilities and war, could lead to reduced sales and reduced profitability associated with such sales.

Adverse economic conditions in the major industries the company serves may materially affect segment performance and consolidated results of operations.

The company’s results of operations are impacted by the market fundamentals of the primary industries served. Significant declines of economic activity in the agricultural, oil and gas exploration, construction, industrial, aerospace/aviation, communication, defense and other major markets served may adversely affect segment performance and consolidated results of operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

The company maintains the following properties in connection with its operations, all of which the company owns, unless indicated otherwise:

	Square			Business
Location	Feet		Function	Segments
Sioux Falls, SD		150,000	Corporate office; electronics manufacturing	All
		131,000	Plastic sheeting manufacturing	Engineered Films
		73,000	Warehouse	Engineered Films
		59,000	Plastic sheeting manufacturing and sewing	Engineered Films; Aerostar
		35,000	Warehouse and offices	Engineered Films; Aerostar
		27,000	Training facility and manufacturing	Applied Technology
		25,000	Inflatable manufacturing	Aerostar
		24,000	Electronics manufacturing	Electronic Systems
		10,000	Machine shop	Applied Technology
		11,000	Training and product development facility	Applied Technology
Sulphur Springs, TX		64,000	Research balloon manufacturing	Aerostar
Springfield, OH		30,000	Warehouse	Engineered Films
Huron, SD		24,000	Sewing plant	Aerostar
St. Louis, MO		24,000	Electronics manufacturing	Electronic Systems
Madison, SD		20,000	Sewing plant	Aerostar
Austin, TX		*7,000	Product development facility	Applied Technology
Stockholm, SK		*7,000	Warehouse	Applied Technology

* Leased

Most of the company’s manufacturing plants also serve as distribution centers and contain offices for sales, engineering and manufacturing support staff. The company believes that its properties are, in all material respects, in good condition and are adequate to meet existing production needs. The company owns 6.95 acres of undeveloped land adjacent to the other owned property in Sioux Falls, which is available for expansion.

7

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

The company is responsible for investigation and remediation of environmental contamination at one of its sold facilities (see “Item 1, Business — Environmental Matters”). In addition, the company is involved as a defendant in lawsuits, claims or disputes arising in the normal course of its business. The potential costs and liability of such claims cannot be determined at this time. Management believes that any liability resulting from these claims will be substantially mitigated by insurance coverage. Accordingly, management does not believe the ultimate outcome of these matters will be significant to its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Item 4. Reserved

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Incorporated by reference to pages 31 (Quarterly Information), 16-17 (Eleven-year Financial Summary) and inside back cover of the 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders.

Under a resolution from the Board of Directors dated March 15, 2008, the company was authorized to repurchase up to $10 million of stock on the open market. No shares were repurchased during the fourth quarter. Approximately $5.1 million of the repurchase authorization remains open, however, the company has temporarily suspended the share repurchase program.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Incorporated by reference to pages 16-17 of the company’s 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Incorporated by reference to pages 19-30 of the company’s 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The exposure to market risks pertains mainly to changes in interest rates on cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The company has no debt. The company does not expect operating results or cash flows to be significantly affected by changes in interest rates. Additionally, the company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. However, the company does utilize derivative financial instruments to manage the economic impact of fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates on those transactions that are denominated in currency other than its functional currency, which is the U.S. dollar. The use of these financial instruments had no material effect on the company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The company’s subsidiaries that operate outside the United States use their local currency as the functional currency. The functional currency is translated into U.S. dollars for balance sheet accounts using the period-end exchange rates, and average exchange rates for the statement of income. Adjustments resulting from financial statement translations are included as cumulative translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within shareholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains or losses are recognized in the period incurred and are included in interest income and other, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Foreign currency fluctuations had no material effect on the company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Incorporated by reference to pages 33-46 of the company’s 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

8

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of January 31, 2010, the end of the period covered by this report, management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), evaluated the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of such date. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of January 31, 2010.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The company included a report from its management concerning its internal control over financial reporting on page 32 of its 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference. The company’s internal control over financial reporting has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm who has also audited its consolidated financial statements, as stated in their report in the section entitled “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” on page 46 of the company’s 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Election of Directors,” “Board of Directors and Committees,” “Corporate Governance,” and “Other Matters” within the company’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Executive Officers

Name	Age		Position
Ronald M. Moquist		64	President and Chief Executive Officer
Thomas Iacarella		56	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
David R. Bair		53	Division Vice President and General Manager — Electronic Systems Division
Matthew T. Burkhart		34	Division Vice President and General Manager — Applied Technology Division
James D. Groninger		51	Division Vice President and General Manager — Engineered Films Division
Barbara K. Ohme		62	Vice President — Administration
Daniel A. Rykhus		45	Executive Vice President
Mark L. West		56	President — Aerostar International, Inc.

Each of the above executive officers serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors on a year-to-year basis.

Mr. Moquist joined Raven in 1975 as Sales and Marketing Manager, served as the company’s Executive Vice President from 1985 through 2000, and has been the company’s President and Chief Executive Officer since 2000.

Mr. Iacarella joined Raven in 1991 as Corporate Controller and has been the company’s Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer since 1998. Prior to joining the company, he held positions with Tonka Corporation and the accounting firm now known as Ernst & Young.

Mr. Bair joined Raven in 1999 as Division Vice President and General Manager of the Electronic Systems Division.

Mr. Burkhart was named Division Vice President and General Manager of the Applied Technology Division on February 1, 2010. He joined Raven in 2008 as Director of Sales for Applied Technology. Prior to joining the company, he was a Branch Manager for Johnson Controls.

9

Mr. Groninger joined Raven in 1986 and in 1995 became Manager of Glasstite, Inc. He has been Division Vice President and General Manager of the Engineered Films Division since 2004.

Ms. Ohme joined Raven in 1987 as Employment Manager and has been the company’s Vice President of Administration since 2004.

Mr. Rykhus joined Raven in 1990 as Director of World Class Manufacturing and has been the company’s Executive Vice President since 2004. He was General Manager of the Applied Technology Division from 1998 through 2009.

Mr. West joined Raven in 1982 as a Project Engineer and has been the President of Aerostar International, Inc. since 1986.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Executive Compensation” and “Non-management Director Compensation” within the company’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

Incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Ownership of Common Stock” within the company’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The remaining information called for by this item relating to “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans” is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Equity Compensation Plan Information” contained in the company’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Board of Directors and Committees” and “Corporate Governance” contained in the company’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees,” contained in the company’s Proxy Statement relating to its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule

     (a) Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule

1.	Incorporated by reference from the attached exhibit containing the 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders:
	Consolidated Balance Sheets
	Consolidated Statements of Income
	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
	Notes to Financial Statements
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
2.	Included in Part II:
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedule
	Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

     All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required.

10

     (b) Exhibits

Exhibit
Number	Description
3(a)	Articles of Incorporation of Raven Industries, Inc. and all amendments thereto.*
3(b)	Bylaws of Raven Industries, Inc.*
3(c)	Extract of Shareholders Resolution adopted on April 7, 1962 with respect to the bylaws of Raven Industries, Inc. *
10(a)	Employment Agreement between Raven Industries, Inc. and Daniel Rykhus dated as of February 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the company’s Form 8-K filed February 1, 2009). †
10(b)	Employment Agreement between Raven Industries, Inc. and David R. Bair dated as of February 1, 2004. † ***
10(c)	Employment Agreement between Raven Industries, Inc. and James D. Groninger dated as of February 1, 2004. † ***
10(d)	Employment Agreement between Raven Industries, Inc. and Mark L. West dated as of February 1, 2004. † ***
10(e)	Employment Agreement between Raven Industries, Inc. and Ronald M. Moquist dated as of February 1, 2004. † **
10(f)	Employment Agreement between Raven Industries, Inc. and Thomas Iacarella dated as of February 1, 2004. † **
10(g)	Schedule A to Employment Agreements between Raven Industries, Inc. and each of the following Senior Executive Officers: Ronald M. Moquist, Thomas Iacarella, and Daniel A. Rykhus (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the company’s Form 8-K filed February 1, 2009). †
10(h)	Employment Agreement between Raven Industries, Inc. and Barbara Ohme dated as of February 1, 2004. † **
10(i)	Change in Control Agreement between Raven Industries, Inc. and each of the following officers and key employees:
	Ronald M. Moquist, Thomas Iacarella, Daniel A. Rykhus, David R. Bair, James D. Groninger, Barbara K. Ohme, and Mark L. West dated as of January 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the company’s 8-K filed December 17, 2007). †
10(j)	Trust Agreement between Raven Industries, Inc. and Norwest Bank South Dakota, N.A. dated April 26, 1989. *
10(k)	Raven Industries, Inc. 2000 Stock Option and Compensation Plan adopted May 24, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the company’s definitive Proxy Statement filed April 19, 2000).†
10(l)	Raven Industries, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors adopted May 23, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s 8-K filed May 24, 2007). †
10(m)	Change in Control Agreement between Raven Industries, Inc. and Matthew T. Burkhart dated February 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the company’s 8-K filed February 2, 2010). †
10(n)	Employment Agreement between Raven Industries, Inc. and Matthew T. Burkhart dated February 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s 8-K filed February 2, 2010). †
10(o)	Schedule A to Employment Agreements between Raven Industries, Inc. and each of the following Senior Managers:
	David R. Bair, Matthew T. Burkhart, James D. Groninger, Barbara K. Ohme and Mark L. West (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the company’s 8-K filed February 2, 2010). †
13	2010 Annual Report to Shareholders (only those portions specifically incorporated herein by reference shall be deemed filed with the Commission).
21	Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1	Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
31.2	Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
32.1	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
32.2	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

†	Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
*	Incorporated by reference to corresponding Exhibit Number of the company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1989.
**	Incorporated by reference to corresponding Exhibit Number of the company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2004.
***	Incorporated by reference to corresponding Exhibit Number of the company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2007.

11

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC. (Registrant)
March 31, 2010	By:	/s/ Ronald M. Moquist
Date		Ronald M. Moquist
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Director)

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

March 31, 2010	/s/ Ronald M. Moquist
Date	Ronald M. Moquist
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer and Director)
March 31, 2010	/s/ Thomas Iacarella
Date	Thomas Iacarella
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Directors:
March 31, 2010	/s/ Thomas S. Everist
Date	Thomas S. Everist
March 31, 2010	/s/ Anthony W. Bour
Date	Anthony W. Bour
March 31, 2010	/s/ David A. Christensen
Date	David A. Christensen
March 31, 2010	/s/ Mark E. Griffin
Date	Mark E. Griffin
March 31, 2010	/s/ Conrad J. Hoigaard
Date	Conrad J. Hoigaard
March 31, 2010	/s/ Kevin T. Kirby
Date	Kevin T. Kirby
March 31, 2010	/s/ Cynthia H. Milligan
Date	Cynthia H. Milligan
March 31, 2010	/s/ Daniel A. Rykhus
Date	Daniel A. Rykhus

12

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Financial Statement Schedule

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Raven Industries, Inc.:

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements and of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting referred to in our report dated March 31, 2010 appearing in the 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders of Raven Industries, Inc. (which report and consolidated financial statements are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) also included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 31, 2010

13

SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(Dollars in thousands)

Column A	Column B		Column C				Column D		Column E
			Additions
	Balance at		Charged to			Charged to	Deductions
	Beginning		Costs and			Other	From		Balance at
Description	of Year		Expenses			Accounts	Reserves (1)		End of Year
Deducted in the balance sheet from the asset to which it applies:
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Year ended January 31, 2010	$	613	$	(183	)	None	$	133	$	297
Year ended January 31, 2009	$	293	$	629		None	$	309	$	613
Year ended January 31, 2008	$	258	$	91		None	$	56	$	293

Note:

(1) Represents uncollectible accounts receivable written off during the year, net of recoveries.

14

EX-13

Eleven-Year Financial Summary

	For the years ended January 31
Dollars in thousands, except per-share data	2010			2009			2008
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR
Net sales
Ongoing operations	$	237,782		$	279,913		$	233,957
Sold businesses(a)		—			—			—
Total		237,782			279,913			233,957
Gross profit(b)		67,852			73,448			63,676
Operating income
Ongoing operations		43,220			46,394			41,145
Sold businesses(a)		—			—			—
Total		43,220			46,394			41,145
Income before income taxes		43,322			46,901			42,224
Net income	$	28,574		$	30,770		$	27,802
Net income as % of sales		12.0	%		11.0	%		11.9	%
Net income as % of beginning equity		25.2	%		26.0	%		28.3	%
Cash dividends	$	9,911		$	31,884	(c)	$	7,966
FINANCIAL POSITION
Current assets	$	117,747		$	98,073		$	100,869
Current liabilities		25,960			23,322			22,108
Working capital	$	91,787		$	74,751		$	78,761
Current ratio		4.54			4.21			4.56
Property, plant and equipment	$	33,029		$	35,880		$	35,743
Total assets		170,309			144,415			147,861
Long-term debt, less current portion		—			—			—
Shareholders’ equity	$	133,251		$	113,556		$	118,275
Long-term debt / total capitalization		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Inventory turnover (CGS / average inventory)(b)		5.3			5.2			5.3
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
Operating activities	$	47,643		$	39,037		$	27,151
Investing activities		(13,396	)		(7,000	)		(4,433	)
Financing activities		(9,867	)		(36,969	)		(8,270	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		24,417			(5,005	)		14,489
COMMON STOCK DATA
Net income per share—basic	$	1.58		$	1.71		$	1.54
Net income per share—diluted		1.58			1.70			1.53
Cash dividends per share		0.55			1.77	(c)		0.44
Book value per share		7.38			6.30			6.52
Stock price range during year
High	$	33.18		$	47.82		$	45.85
Low		15.37			20.60			26.20
Close	$	28.58		$	21.81		$	30.02
Shares and stock units outstanding, year-end (in thousands)		18,051			18,027			18,130
Number of shareholders, year-end		7,767			8,268			8,700
OTHER DATA
Price / earnings ratio		18.1			12.8			19.6
Average number of employees		930			1,070			930
Sales per employee	$	256		$	262		$	252
Backlog	$	74,718		$	80,361		$	66,628

	All per-share, shares outstanding and market price data reflect the October 2004 two-for-one stock split, the January 2003 two-for-one stock split and the July 2001 three-for-two stock split.
	All other figures are as reported.
	Price / earnings ratio is determined as closing stock price divided by net income per share—diluted.
	Book value per share is computed by dividing total shareholders’ equity by the number of common shares and stock units outstanding.
(a)	In fiscal 2003, 2001 and 2000, the company sold its Beta Raven Industrial Controls, Plastic Tank, and Glasstite businesses, respectively.
(b)	All years reflect the reclassification of R&D expense from cost of goods sold. (See Note 1.)
(c)	Includes special dividends of $1.25 per share in fiscal 2009 and $.625 per share in fiscal 2005.

16 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

2007			2006			2005			2004			2003			2002			2001			2000
$	217,529		$	204,528		$	168,086		$	142,727		$	119,589		$	112,018		$	113,360		$	107,862
	—			—			—			—			1,314			6,497			19,498			42,523
	217,529			204,528			168,086			142,727			120,903			118,515			132,858			150,385
	57,540			55,714			45,212			35,488			28,828			25,340			21,740			24,853
	38,302			37,284			27,862			21,981			16,861			13,788			7,417	(d)		7,971
	—			—			—			(355	)		204			(613	)		3,331	(e)		2,606	(f)
	38,302			37,284			27,862			21,626			17,065			13,175			10,748			10,577
	38,835			37,494			27,955			21,716			17,254			13,565			10,924			10,503
$	25,441		$	24,262		$	17,891		$	13,836		$	11,185		$	8,847		$	6,411	(d)(e)	$	6,762	(f)
	11.7	%		11.9	%		10.6	%		9.7	%		9.3	%		7.5	%		4.8	%		4.5	%
	30.1	%		36.7	%		26.9	%		23.8	%		21.5	%		18.4	%		11.8	%		10.9	%
$	6,507		$	5,056		$	15,298	(c)	$	3,075		$	2,563		$	2,371		$	2,399		$	2,895
$	73,219		$	71,345		$	61,592		$	55,710		$	49,351		$	45,308		$	51,817		$	55,371
	16,464			20,050			20,950			11,895			13,167			13,810			13,935			14,702
$	56,755		$	51,295		$	40,642		$	43,815		$	36,184		$	31,498		$	37,882		$	40,669
	4.45			3.56			2.94			4.68			3.75			3.28			3.72			3.77
$	36,264		$	25,602		$	19,964		$	15,950		$	16,455		$	14,059		$	11,647		$	15,068
	119,764			106,157			88,509			79,508			72,816			67,836			65,656			74,047
	—			9			—			57			151			280			2,013			3,024
$	98,268		$	84,389		$	66,082		$	66,471		$	58,236		$	52,032		$	47,989		$	54,519
	0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.1	%		0.3	%		0.5	%		4.0	%		5.3	%
	5.4			5.9			5.8			6.1			4.8			5.1			4.5			3.8
$	26,313		$	21,189		$	18,871		$	19,732		$	12,735		$	18,496		$	9,441		$	10,375
	(18,664	)		(11,435	)		(7,631	)		(4,352	)		(9,166	)		(13,152	)		9,752			6,323
	(10,277	)		(6,946	)		(19,063	)		(6,155	)		(5,830	)		(8,539	)		(14,227	)		(16,326	)
	(2,626	)		2,790			(7,823	)		9,225			(2,261	)		(3,195	)		4,966			372
$	1.41		$	1.34		$	0.99		$	0.77		$	0.61		$	0.48		$	0.31		$	0.26
	1.39			1.32			0.97			0.75			0.60			0.47			0.31			0.26
	0.36			0.28			0.85	(c)		0.17			0.14			0.13			0.12			0.11
	5.45			4.67			3.67			3.68			3.21			2.82			2.53			2.32
$	42.70		$	33.15		$	26.94		$	15.23		$	9.20		$	5.88		$	3.48		$	3.04
	25.46			16.54			13.08			7.56			4.38			3.02			1.88			2.25
$	28.43		$	31.60		$	18.38		$	14.11		$	7.91		$	5.64		$	3.04		$	2.40
	18,044			18,072			17,999			18,041			18,133			18,424			18,956			23,496
	8,992			9,263			6,269			3,560			2,781			2,387			2,460			2,749
	20.5			23.9			18.9			18.8			13.2			12.1			9.8			9.2
	884			845			835			787			784			858			1,082			1,369
$	246		$	242		$	201		$	181		$	154		$	138		$	123		$	110
$	44,237		$	43,619		$	43,646		$	47,120		$	42,826		$	33,834		$	38,239		$	44,935

(d)	Includes $2.6 million of business repositioning charges, net of gains on plant sales, primarily in Electronic Systems and Aerostar.
(e)	Includes the $3.1 million pretax gain ($1.4 million net of tax) on the sale of the company’s Plastic Tank Division.
(f)	Includes the $1.2 million pretax gain ($764,000 net of tax) on the sale of assets of the company’s Glasstite subsidiary.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 17

Financial Review and Analysis

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is designed to enhance overall financial disclosure. It provides management’s analysis of the primary drivers of year-over-year changes in key financial statement elements, business segment results and the impact of accounting principles on the company’s financial statements.

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the company’s January 31, 2010 financial statements and the accompanying notes.

The MD&A is organized as follows:

• Executive Summary

• Results of Operations—Segment Analysis

• Outlook

• Liquidity and Capital Resources

• Off-balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

• Critical Accounting Estimates

• New Accounting Standards

Reclassification of Research and Development Expenses

Research and development (R&D) expenses include costs related to product development and significant enhancements of existing products. Beginning in fiscal 2010, gross margins were affected by the reclassification of R&D expenses, removing them from cost of goods sold to a separate item below gross profit. As a result, the Applied Technology Division’s gross margins were recomputed and adjusted from 40.2% to 45.2% for fiscal 2009, and 37.9% to 44.5% for fiscal 2008. The impact of the reclassification of R&D expenses on gross margins was not significant for the company’s other segments. Additionally, R&D expenses that were previously classified as selling, general and administrative expenses were also reclassified to the separate R&D expenses line. The reclassifications had no affect on any segment’s previously reported operating income or consolidated operating income.

Components of consolidated operating income for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 and 2008, as originally reported and as reclassified, were as follows:

	For the year ended						For the year ended
	January 31, 2009						January 31, 2008
	As			As			As			As
Dollars in thousands	reported			reclassified			reported			reclassified
Net sales	$	279,913		$	279,913		$	233,957		$	233,957
Cost of goods sold		212,032			206,465			174,809			170,281
Gross profit		67,881			73,448			59,148			63,676
Gross margins		24.3	%		26.2	%		25.3	%		27.2	%
Research and development expenses		—			5,848			—			4,925
Selling, general and administrative expenses		21,487			21,206			18,003			17,606
Operating income	$	46,394		$	46,394		$	41,145		$	41,145

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Raven Industries, Inc. is an industrial manufacturer providing a variety of products to customers within the industrial, agricultural, construction and military/aerospace markets, primarily in North America. The company operates in four business segments: Applied Technology (formerly Flow Controls), Engineered Films, Electronic Systems and Aerostar.

Management uses a number of metrics to assess the company’s performance:

• Consolidated net sales, gross margins, operating income, operating margins, net income and earnings per share

• Cash flow from operations and payments to shareholders

• Return on sales, assets and equity

• Segment net sales, gross profit, gross margins, operating income and operating margins

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 19

Financial Review and Analysis (continued)

The following discussion highlights the consolidated operating results. Segment operating results are more fully explained in the Results of Operations—Segment Analysis section.

Financial highlights for fiscal years ended January 31,

				%						%
Dollars in thousands, except per share data	2010			change			2009			change			2008
Results of Operations
Net sales	$	237,782			(15	)%	$	279,913			20	%	$	233,957
Gross margins(a)		28.5	%					26.2	%					27.2	%
Operating income	$	43,220			(7	)%	$	46,394			13	%	$	41,145
Operating margins		18.2	%					16.6	%					17.6	%
Net income	$	28,574			(7	)%	$	30,770			11	%	$	27,802
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.58			(7	)%	$	1.70			11	%	$	1.53

(a) The company’s gross margins may not be comparable to industry peers due to variability in the classification of expenses across industries in which the company operates.  

Cash Flow and Payments to Shareholders
Cash flow from operations	$	47,643		$	39,037		$	27,151
Cash dividends	$	9,911		$	31,884		$	7,966
Common stock repurchases		—			5,180			592
Cash returned to shareholders	$	9,911		$	37,064		$	8,558
Performance Measures
Return on net sales (net income / net sales)		12.0	%		11.0	%		11.9	%
Return on average assets (net income / average assets)		18.2	%		21.1	%		20.8	%
Return on beginning equity (net income / beginning equity)		25.2	%		26.0	%		28.3	%

Results of Operations—Fiscal 2010 versus Fiscal 2009

The slump in global economic activity that began negatively affecting the company’s financial results in the last quarter of fiscal 2009 continued through fiscal 2010. During the second half of fiscal 2010, global economies began to show signs of a recovery from the unprecedented volatility and disruption. However, there is substantial uncertainty as to the strength and sustainability of the economic recovery.

The 15% decrease in net sales is the result of year-over-year sales declines in Applied Technology (16%) and Engineered Films (29%). Electronic Systems and Aerostar sales were relatively flat year-over-year. Expectations of lower farm income and economic uncertainty caused growers and custom spray applicators to defer purchases, which negatively affected substantially all of Applied Technology’s product categories. The impact of the weak economy on Engineered Films’ largest markets resulted in year-over-year declines of energy market sales (40%) and construction market sales (25%). Electronic Systems sales were up 2% year-over-year, reflecting increased deliveries of avionics and secure communication electronics to meet rising demand from government agencies and the aerospace market, which was partially offset by a smaller customer base. Aerostar sales were flat compared with last year, as increased deliveries of MC-6 Army parachutes, aerostats and research balloons were offset by decreased deliveries of protective wear.

Applied Technology operating margins contracted year-over-year, reflecting the negative impact of lower sales on operating leverage. However, disciplined margin management, operational efficiencies and higher productivity brought improved operating margins for Engineered Films, Electronic Systems and Aerostar. Consequently, the 7% year-over-year decrease in operating income was less severe than the 15% drop in sales.

While fourth quarter revenues of $55.8 million were down 7%, net income grew 25% from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Applied Technology quarterly sales fell 12%, resulting from the negative impact of lower farm income and economic uncertainty. Electronic Systems fourth quarter sales declined 14% due to lower sales of secure communication electronics, reflecting lower demand from government agencies, and slower avionics deliveries, as commercial airlines began cancelling or delaying delivery schedules. Aerostar’s quarterly sales dropped 12%, as fiscal 2009 fourth quarter results included nearly $3 million of MC-6 parachute deliveries that were delayed from the prior quarter due to contract modifications. Engineered Films fourth quarter sales rose 15% due to increased business activity and higher energy prices, as growth in emerging markets drove oil prices to levels adequate to support an increase in drilling activity. This resulted in a 40% increase in fourth quarter sales of pit and pond lining films to the oil and gas exploration markets from the prior year.

Fourth quarter net income of $5.8 million rose 25% year-over-year. Disciplined margin management at Engineered Films led to $2.4 million of operating income versus an operating loss of $178,000 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Management responded quickly and decisively to the freefall in business activity experienced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 by tightly managing expenses and decreasing headcount—necessary steps to align the division with the weak business environment.

20 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

Results of Operations—Fiscal 2009 versus Fiscal 2008

In fiscal 2009, the company posted record sales, operating income, net income, diluted earnings per share and operating cash flow. The results were fueled by a strong agricultural market and new product introductions in the Applied Technology segment and, to a lesser extent, shipments under government contracts at Aerostar. The 20% increase in net sales was the result of year-over-year sales growth in Applied Technology (60%), Aerostar (57%) and Engineered Films (5%). The 13% rise in operating income was primarily the result of sales growth and positive operating leverage generated by Applied Technology. The increase in operating income fell short of the growth in sales as a result of negative operating leverage at Electronic Systems, when sales volume slipped due to the loss of a customer and the weak economy. In addition, Engineered Films margins contracted as competitive pricing pressures created by the slowdown in construction activity prevented the pass-through of increased plastic resin costs.

Strategic Investments

In November 2009, the company made two significant investments. These enhanced Applied Technology’s information strategy of providing a comprehensive precision agriculture system to improve productivity and efficiency by transforming field data into knowledge.

Site-Specific Technology Development Group, Inc. (SST)

The company acquired a 20% interest in SST, a privately held agricultural software development and information services provider, for $5.0 million. Raven and SST are strategically aligned to provide customers with simple, more efficient ways to move and manage information in the precision agriculture market.

Ranchview, Inc. (Ranchview)

The company purchased substantially all of the assets of Ranchview, Inc., a privately held Canadian start-up company for $1.5 million cash and contingent consideration valued at $2.3 million. Raven has agreed to pay additional consideration on a quarterly basis of 6% on future sales of Ranchview products, up to a maximum payment of $4.0 million. Ranchview developed products that use cellular networks instead of traditional radio systems that are typically used to deliver RTK (Real Time Kinematic) corrections to GPS enabled equipment.

Cash Flow and Payments to Shareholders

Raven continues to generate strong operating cash flows, hitting a record $47.6 million in fiscal 2010 due to company earnings and lower accounts receivable and inventory levels. Working capital levels reflected both lower business activity and improved management of working capital.

During fiscal 2010, $9.9 million was returned to shareholders through quarterly dividends. The quarterly cash dividend increased from 13 cents per share to 14 cents per share beginning in the second quarter. This represents the 23rd consecutive increase in the annual dividend (excluding special dividends).

During fiscal 2009, $37.1 million was returned to shareholders through stock repurchases, quarterly dividends and a special dividend of $22.5 million paid in November 2008.

Performance Measures

Despite challenging economic conditions, the company continues to generate solid returns on net sales, average assets and beginning equity, which are important gauges of Raven’s ability to efficiently produce profits. Raven generated a record 12% return on sales in fiscal 2010. Improved operating efficiencies and cost containment overcame the negative impact of weak market conditions on the company’s net sales and earnings.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 21

Financial Review and Analysis (continued)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—SEGMENT ANALYSIS

Applied Technology

Applied Technology provides electronic and Global Positioning System (GPS) products designed to reduce operating costs and improve yields for the agriculture market.

Financial highlights for fiscal years ended January 31,

				%						%
Dollars in thousands	2010			change			2009			change			2008
Applied Technology
Net sales	$	86,217			(16	)%	$	103,098			60	%	$	64,291
Gross profit		37,889			(19	)%		46,591			63	%		28,640
Gross margins		43.9	%					45.2	%					44.5	%
Operating income	$	25,722			(24	)%	$	33,884			77	%	$	19,102
Operating margins		29.8	%					32.9	%					29.7	%

Fiscal 2010 net sales of $86.2 million decreased $16.9 million (16%) and operating income of $25.7 million was down $8.2 million (24%) versus fiscal 2009. Lower sales and operating income were due primarily to a decrease in sales volume partially offset by modest selling price increases.

Fiscal 2010 fourth quarter net sales of $17.3 million were off $2.4 million (12%) and operating income of $4.1 million fell $1.1 million (21%).

A number of factors contributed to the drop in full-year and fourth quarter comparative results:

• Economic uncertainty. The government’s calendar 2009 farm income forecast was significantly lower than 2008 actual levels. Farm production costs declined from prior-year levels; however, they were outpaced by the decline in crop prices. Expectations of lower farm income and economic uncertainty led growers and custom spray applicators to defer purchases. These factors had a negative impact on substantially all of the segment’s product categories.

• New product sales. Products that enable entry into new markets, have new applications, or are customized are included in the new product sales category for 24 months from their release date. Fiscal 2010 new product sales decreased from a year ago, reflecting the highly successful fiscal 2009 launches of innovative field computers.

• International sales. International sales of $17.1 million fell $1.7 million (9%) year-over-year. Net sales outside the U.S. accounted for 20% of segment sales in fiscal 2010 versus 18% in fiscal 2009. Declines in some markets were partially offset by expansion into regions not previously served.

• Negative operating leverage. Gross margins of 43.9% in fiscal 2010 fell from 45.2% in fiscal 2009. Selling expenses in the latest year were $7.0 million, or 8.1% of net sales, compared with $7.5 million, or 7.3% of net sales, for fiscal 2009. The change in profits and selling expenses as a percentage of sales reflected the negative impact of falling sales on operating leverage.

• Research and development. R&D expenses of $5.2 million were flat between the two years; however, they increased as a percentage of net sales—6.0% for fiscal 2010 versus 5.0% for fiscal 2009. Focused investments in R&D are critical to product development, which will support future growth and competitive position in the marketplace.

Fiscal 2009 net sales of $103.1 million increased $38.8 million (60%) and operating income of $33.9 million grew $14.8 million (77%) over fiscal 2008. The increase in sales and operating income was due primarily to higher sales volume and modest selling price increases.

These factors contributed to higher sales volume and strong operating results:

• Healthy global farm fundamentals. Commodity prices were strong through the first nine months of the year but fell from their highs. However, agricultural market fundamentals remained strong and continued to influence growers’ capital investment decisions, increasing demand for Applied Technology precision agriculture equipment.

• Investments in select global markets. International sales rose to 18% of segment sales in fiscal 2009 compared with 16% in fiscal 2008, an increase of $8.7 million.

• Increased acceptance of precision agriculture. Double-digit year-over-year sales growth was achieved for all product categories (standard, precision, steering and Autoboom^TM). This reflected strong customer demand for flagship sprayer products as well as newer products such as the Cruizer^TM—a simple and affordable guidance system targeted at new entrants to the precision agriculture market.

22 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

• Positive operating leverage. Gross margins of 45.2% in fiscal 2009 compared favorably to fiscal 2008 gross margins of 44.5%. Fiscal 2009 selling expenses were $7.5 million, or 7.3% of net sales, compared with fiscal 2008 selling expenses of $5.3 million, or 8.2% of net sales. These improvements came from positive operating leverage generated through increased sales volume.

Engineered Films

Engineered Films produces rugged reinforced plastic sheeting for industrial, construction, geomembrane and agricultural applications.

Financial highlights for fiscal years ended January 31,

				%						%
Dollars in thousands	2010			change			2009			change			2008
Engineered Films
Net sales	$	63,783			(29	)%	$	89,858			5	%	$	85,316
Gross profit		13,013			(10	)%		14,502			(32	)%		21,236
Gross margins		20.4	%					16.1	%					24.9	%
Operating income	$	10,232			(6	)%	$	10,919			(38	)%	$	17,739
Operating margins		16.0	%					12.2	%					20.8	%

Fiscal 2010 net sales of $63.8 million decreased $26.1 million (29%) while operating income of $10.2 million was off $687,000 (6%) versus fiscal 2009. Lower sales and operating income reflected falling sales volume and selling prices.

The year-over-year change was driven primarily by the following factors:

• Depressed markets. Dysfunctional credit markets and plunging asset values resulted in weak economic activity. Energy prices plunged as a result of the reduction in economic activity, leading to the decline in the oil and gas exploration market throughout the majority of the year. Similarly, as the flow of credit slowed and economic uncertainty rose, the commercial construction markets suffered. Agricultural commodity prices also fell sharply, resulting in a softening of the agricultural market. The impact of the recession was felt across all of the division’s markets, with sales to the two largest markets—energy and construction—decreasing approximately 40% and 25%, respectively.

• Sales volume and selling prices. Selling prices decreased approximately 16% and sales volume, as measured by pounds shipped, fell 17% year-over-year. These negative trends reflected market disruptions, competitive pricing pressures stemming from excess industry capacity and lower resin costs due to relatively low natural gas prices.

• Cost containment. Management responded quickly and decisively to the freefall in business activity experienced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. The necessary steps were taken to align the division with the weak business environment, by tightly managing expenses and decreasing headcount.

• Margin preservation. Poor economic conditions, volatile material costs and competitive pricing pressures squeezed margins. However, the impact of these factors was more than offset by opportune purchases of prime grade resin and cost containments. Consequently, gross margins increased from 16.1% to 20.4%.

• Selling expenses. Selling expenses increased to 3.8% of sales from 3.6% in the prior year. Selling expenses of $2.4 million decreased 25% year-over-year, through reductions in personnel and promotional expenses. However, this lagged the 29% drop in sales.

Fiscal 2010 fourth quarter net sales of $16.7 million increased $2.2 million (15%) from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. In addition, the segment posted fourth quarter fiscal 2010 operating income of $2.4 million compared with an operating loss of $178,000 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.

Fiscal 2010 fourth quarter results were affected by the following:

• Market stabilization. Sales and profit comparisons were favorable, as fourth quarter fiscal 2009 financial results were deeply affected by the freefall in business activity.

• Sales volume. Higher sales for the quarter were largely volume driven. Greater business activity and growth in emerging markets drove oil prices to levels adequate to support an increase in drilling activity. As a result, fourth quarter sales of pit and pond lining films to the oil and gas exploration markets rose 40% as distributors replenished inventory levels.

• Margin expansion. Gross margins increased from 3.6% for last year’s fourth quarter to 18.5%. Last year’s margins were negatively affected by a sudden decrease in sales volume on a relatively high-cost base and high-cost inventory.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 23

Financial Review and Analysis (continued)

Fiscal 2009 net sales of $89.9 million increased $4.5 million (5%) while operating income of $10.9 million fell $6.8 million (38%) versus fiscal 2008.

Fiscal 2009 results were driven by these trends:

• Sales volume and selling prices. Sales increased due to higher volume coupled with a modest increase in selling prices. Strong sales of pit and pond lining films to the oil and gas market and higher agriculture sales were partially offset by a decline in sales to the manufactured housing market.

• Margin contraction. Depressed margins reflected volatile material costs, increased price competition and poor economic conditions. Competitive pricing pressures—especially in the construction market—hindered the ability to pass on higher resin costs. This meant production costs outpaced increases in selling prices. Gross margins decreased from 24.9% in fiscal 2008 to 16.1% in fiscal 2009.

• Selling expenses. Fiscal 2009 selling expenses of $3.2 million were relatively flat year-over-year.

Electronic Systems

Electronic Systems is a total-solutions provider of electronics manufacturing services, primarily to North American original equipment manufacturers.

Financial highlights for fiscal years ended January 31,

				%						%
Dollars in thousands	2010			change			2009			change			2008
Electronic Systems
Net sales	$	63,525			2	%	$	61,983			(9	)%	$	67,987
Gross profit		10,258			42	%		7,218			(38	)%		11,557
Gross margins		16.1	%					11.6	%					17.0	%
Operating income	$	8,979			52	%	$	5,926			(43	)%	$	10,365
Operating margins		14.1	%					9.6	%					15.2	%

Fiscal 2010 net sales of $63.5 million increased $1.5 million (2%) and operating income of $9.0 million grew $3.1 million (52%) from fiscal 2009.

Fiscal 2010 full-year comparative results reflected the following:

• Growth from existing customers. The 2% rise in sales was attributable to higher deliveries of avionics (10%) and secure communication electronics (20%) to meet increased demand from government agencies and the aerospace market, partially offset by a smaller customer base.

• Margin expansion. Gross margins expanded as a result of positive operating leverage produced through increased sales to existing customers, favorable product mix and cost controls—such as headcount reductions and facility consolidation.

• Selling expenses. Selling expenses of $1.2 million (1.8% of sales) were consistent with the prior year.

Fiscal 2010 fourth quarter net sales of $13.8 million fell $2.3 million (14%) and operating income of $2.0 million decreased $288,000 (13%) from fourth quarter fiscal 2009.

Fiscal 2010 fourth quarter comparative results reflected the following:

• Secure communication electronics and avionics. Fourth quarter sales declined 14% due to lower sales of secure communication electronics, reflecting lower demand from government agencies, and slower avionics deliveries, as commercial airlines began cancelling or delaying delivery schedules. Approximately 70% of avionics sales are related to military aircraft, which mitigate the negative impact of disruptions on commercial deliveries.

Fiscal 2009 net sales of $62.0 million decreased $6.0 million (9%) and operating income of $5.9 million declined $4.4 million (43%) from fiscal 2008.

The following factors affected fiscal 2009 full-year comparative results:

• Slower consumer spending. Hand-held bed control shipments were negatively affected by lower consumer spending on non-essential home-related products, reflecting the influence of financial uncertainty on consumer sentiment and a soft construction market.

• Loss of a customer. Fiscal 2008 results included $7 million of sales to a former customer (which was acquired) and a profitable non-repeat close-out order.

24 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

• Increased sales of avionics. Strong sales of avionics partially offset the negative impact of the factors mentioned earlier.

• Negative operating leverage. Gross margins suffered from negative operating leverage on lower sales and a less favorable product mix. Fiscal 2009 third and fourth quarter operating expenses were reduced by consolidating manufacturing space, which led to improved gross margins in the second half of the year.

• Selling expenses. Selling expenses of $1.1 million (1.7% of sales) were consistent with the prior year.

Aerostar

Aerostar manufactures military parachutes, protective wear, custom-shaped inflatable products and high-altitude and tethered aerostats for government and commercial research.

Financial highlights for fiscal years ended January 31,

				%						%
Dollars in thousands	2010			change			2009			change			2008
Aerostar
Net sales	$	27,244			0	%	$	27,186			57	%	$	17,290
Gross profit		6,632			28	%		5,189			121	%		2,343
Gross margins		24.3	%					19.1	%					13.6	%
Operating income	$	5,634			34	%	$	4,219			180	%	$	1,506
Operating margins		20.7	%					15.5	%					8.7	%

Fiscal 2010 net sales of $27.2 million were flat and operating income of $5.6 million grew $1.4 million (34%) over fiscal 2009.

Fiscal 2010 fourth quarter net sales of $8.9 million decreased $1.3 million (12%) and operating income of $2.1 million increased $299,000 (17%) versus fiscal 2009.

Fiscal 2010 fourth quarter and full-year comparative results were primarily attributable to the following:

• Sales volumes. Flat year-over-year sales reflected increased deliveries of MC-6 Army parachutes, aerostats and research balloons, which were offset by decreased deliveries of protective wear due to the completion of a large contract in January 2009. Fourth quarter sales dropped 12% as fiscal 2009 fourth quarter results included nearly $3 million of MC-6 parachute deliveries that were delayed from the prior quarter due to contract modifications.

• Margin expansion. The improvement in gross and operating margins came from increased parachute manufacturing efficiencies. Final production runs and deliveries of the MC-6 parachute contract were made at the end of fiscal 2010. Fiscal 2010 was the most profitable year for the program, primarily due to the higher efficiency level attained.

• Selling expenses. Selling expenses of $800,000 (2.9% of sales) were consistent with the prior year.

Fiscal 2009 net sales of $27.2 million increased $9.9 million (57%) and operating income of $4.2 million grew $2.7 million (180%) over fiscal 2008.

Fiscal 2009 comparative results were primarily affected by the following items:

• Government contracts. Shipments of protective wear and MC-6 parachutes increased year-over-year. Deliveries under the $20.7 million MC-6 Army parachute and $6.5 million protective wear contracts began in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.

• Positive operating leverage. Gross margins of 19.1% in fiscal 2009 compared favorably with gross margins of 13.6% in fiscal 2008, bolstered by increased MC-6 Army parachute and protective wear shipments.

• Selling expenses. Fiscal 2009 selling expenses of 3.1% of net sales compared favorably with 4.1% of net sales in fiscal 2008. Selling expenses of $856,000 increased 22% year-over-year; however, the increase lagged the 57% rise in sales.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 25

Financial Review and Analysis (continued)

Corporate Expenses (administrative expenses, income taxes and interest income and other, net)

Dollars in thousands	2010			2009			2008
Administrative expenses	$	7,407		$	8,502		$	7,467
Administrative expenses as a % of sales		3.1	%		3.0	%		3.2	%
Interest income and other, net	$	102		$	507		$	1,079
Effective tax rate		34.0	%		34.4	%		34.2	%

Administrative expenses declined 13% in fiscal 2010 compared with fiscal 2009, driven by headcount reductions and lower incentive compensation and legal expenses. Administrative expenses increased 14% in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008, as a result of higher compensation and professional service expense.

“Interest income and other, net” consists mainly of interest income, bank fees and foreign currency transaction gain or loss. The year-over-year declines of $405,000 in fiscal 2010 and $572,000 in fiscal 2009 were attributable primarily to a decrease in interest income due to lower interest rates.

Effective tax rates for the three years presented were favorably affected by the U.S. federal tax deduction from income attributable to manufacturing activities.

OUTLOOK

Management expects to be challenged by a difficult operating environment in fiscal 2011, due to high unemployment, weak residential and consumer construction and continued de-leveraging of consumer and corporate balance sheets. Despite this subdued economic outlook, management anticipates near-term growth through market share gains, new products and geographic expansion. Long-term growth will be driven by 1) research and development, 2) capital investment in new products and technologies, 3) strategic investments to augment existing products and markets and 4) continued expansion of the company’s global reach. The successful execution of the company’s fiscal 2010 strategy of preserving and generating cash and tightly managing costs has strengthened the company’s core businesses.

Applied Technology

Management anticipates fiscal 2011 sales growth to be in the 10% range. New product sales—including those developed through the Ranchview acquisition—and international market growth are expected to offset weakness in the domestic agriculture market.

Global opportunities continue, due to rising global demand for food, heightened environmental concerns and broadening recognition of precision agriculture as a modest capital investment with rapid returns. Applied Technology continues to see significant opportunities in developing markets—such as Eastern Europe, Russia and Brazil—and developed markets—such as Canada, Europe and Australia.

Previous investments in product development and global expansion, along with the recent investments in SST and Ranchview, position Applied Technology as a premier total precision solutions provider (GPS steering devices, planting and spraying controls, data collection, transmission, storage and analysis). In addition, the division will benefit from the continued focus on “ease of use” and product “localization.”

Engineered Films

Engineered Films financial results have been affected by global economic weakness and associated declines in oil and gas consumption and construction activity. However, the prompt re-alignment of the cost structure with market conditions has strengthened the division’s position for fiscal 2011.

Fiscal 2011 revenue growth is targeted in the 10% range on a constant dollar basis. The volatile pricing environment could materially affect actual sales levels. Management anticipates increased sales of geomembrane products for lining and capping landfills, water canals and reservoirs. In addition, Engineered Films continues to develop new products, and market innovative products such as FeedFresh^TM silage covers and VaporBlock Plus^TM radon barriers. Ultimately, Engineered Films growth is dependent on the reversal of the severe economic contraction, particularly in the oil and gas drilling and construction markets.

Electronic Systems

In fiscal 2011, management anticipates Electronic Systems to maintain a good level of profit and cash flow on relatively flat sales. Lower avionics revenues are expected to be substantially offset by higher sales of secure communications and controls.

Aerostar

Management believes revenue growth of 50% or more can be achieved by Aerostar in the coming year. The three-year MC-6 parachute contract, completed at the end of fiscal 2010, will be replaced by deliveries on the T-11 parachute contract in fiscal 2011. In addition, Aerostar’s growth

26 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

strategy, which focused on tethered aerostat systems for use in persistent surveillance by the military, is beginning to generate significant sales orders. More than $7 million in orders were received in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. Aerostar will continue to capitalize on opportunities in the tethered aerostat market throughout fiscal 2011 and expects significant growth in this product line. The profit impact of higher sales is expected to be partially offset by start-up costs on new contracts.

Corporate and other

Administrative costs in fiscal 2011 are expected to approach fiscal 2009 levels due to higher compensation costs. The increase in the U.S. manufacturer’s tax deduction should reduce the company’s effective income tax rate by approximately one percentage point, although this could be offset if the research and development income tax credit is not renewed in the U.S.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The company’s liquidity and capital resources are strong despite the global economic recession. Management focuses on the current cash balance and operating cash flows in considering liquidity, as operating cash flows have historically been Raven’s primary source of liquidity. Management expects that current cash, combined with the generation of positive operating cash flows, will be enough to fund the company’s operating, investing and financing activities.

Raven’s cash needs are seasonal, with working capital demands strongest in the first quarter. As a result, the discussion of trends in operating cash flows focuses on the primary drivers of year-over-year variability in working capital.

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $43.7 million at January 31, 2010, a $27.4 million increase from $16.3 million on the same date in 2009. In November 2008, the company paid a special cash dividend of $22.5 million.

In addition, Raven has an uncollateralized credit agreement that provides an $8.0 million line of credit. The credit line is expected to be renewed during fiscal 2011, as the maturity date on the current line of credit is September 1, 2010.

Operating Activities

Operating cash flows result primarily from cash received from customers, which is offset by cash payments for inventories, services and employee compensation. Management evaluates working capital levels through the computation of average day’s sales outstanding and inventory turnover. Average day’s sales outstanding is a measure of the company’s efficiency in enforcing its credit policy. The inventory turnover ratio is a metric used to evaluate the effectiveness of inventory management, with further consideration given to balancing the disadvantages of excess inventory with the risk of delayed customer deliveries.

Cash provided by operating activities was $47.6 million in fiscal 2010 compared with $39.0 million in fiscal 2009. The increase in operating cash flows is the result of favorable variability in working capital needs, partially offset by lower company earnings.

Reductions in inventory and accounts receivable have combined to generate $7.9 million in cash versus cash consumed of $4.2 million in fiscal 2009. Lower business levels, disciplined inventory management (inventory turnover of 5.3X in fiscal 2010 versus 5.2X in fiscal 2009) and improved cash collections (average day’s sales outstanding of 52 days in fiscal 2010 versus 54 days in fiscal 2009) resulted in strong operating cash flows. Additionally, year-over-year variability in accounts payable generated $2.9 million in cash, as compared with $963,000 in fiscal 2009, due to more favorable payment terms. This favorable cash impact was partially offset by a decrease in accrued liabilities, which reflected lower compensation accruals and the acceleration of a $1.1 million cash contribution to the employee 401(k) plan, due to a change in the plan design. Fiscal 2010 bad debt recoveries of $183,000 compared favorably to prior-year expense of $629,000, reflecting lower sales and more stable economic conditions—particularly as it related to the company’s international exposure.

Fiscal 2009 cash provided by operating activities was $39.0 million, an increase of $11.9 million from $27.2 million in fiscal 2008. The improvement in fiscal 2009 operating cash flows versus one year earlier was due primarily to company earnings, lower inventory levels and a higher accounts payable balance. Inventory declined to $36.0 million in fiscal 2009 from $36.5 million in fiscal 2008. Lower Engineered Films inventories were partially offset by higher levels at Applied Technology. Accounts payable at January 31, 2009, of $9.4 million was up 13% from one year earlier, reflecting more favorable payment terms. Partially offsetting these cash flow improvements was cash consumed to finance higher accounts receivable. Accounts receivable rose from $36.5 million in fiscal 2008 to $40.3 million at January 31, 2009, with Applied Technology sales growth and seasonal payment terms offered to the agricultural market accounting for the majority of the increase. Fiscal 2009 bad debt expense of $629,000 was up $538,000 from the prior year. This reflected specific customer receivable writeoffs, as well as additional reserves for increased international exposure.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 27

Financial Review and Analysis (continued)

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities totaled $13.4 million in fiscal 2010, $7.0 million in fiscal 2009 and $4.4 million in fiscal 2008. The fiscal 2010 increase of $6.4 million reflected a $4.5 million increase in net purchases of short-term investments and $6.5 million of cash outlays for the SST and Ranchview investments, partially offset by a $4.7 million decrease in capital expenditures.

Additional cash consumed between fiscal 2009 and 2008 was due primarily to higher capital expenditures to support the increased manufacturing requirements of Applied Technology.

Management anticipates fiscal 2011 capital spending of roughly $8 million.

Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities is primarily for dividend payments and repurchases of common stock.

Financing activities consumed cash of $9.9 million in fiscal 2010 compared with $37.0 million in fiscal 2009 and $8.3 million in fiscal 2008.

The quarterly cash dividend was increased by 8 percent to 14 cents per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Quarterly dividends of $9.9 million, or 55 cents per share, were paid in the current year compared with $9.4 million, or 52 cents per share, in fiscal 2009. In addition, a special dividend of $1.25 per share was paid in November 2008. The $22.5 million special dividend was in response to Raven’s strong cash position and commitment to return excess cash to shareholders. Treasury stock purchases totaled $5.2 million for fiscal 2009. No treasury stock purchases were made in fiscal 2010, as the share repurchase program was suspended in July 2008.

The change between fiscal 2009 and 2008 financing activity cash flows was the result of an increase in quarterly dividends, stock repurchases and the fiscal 2009 special dividend. Repurchases of the company’s common stock totaled $5.2 million (161,100 shares) in fiscal 2009 in contrast to $592,000 (20,150 shares) in fiscal 2008. The fiscal 2009 quarterly dividend of 13 cents per share increased from 11 cents per share one year earlier.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

As of January 31, 2010, the company is obligated to make cash payments in connection with its non-cancelable operating leases for facilities and equipment and unconditional purchase obligations—primarily for raw materials—in the amounts listed below. The company has no off-balance sheet debt or other unrecorded obligations other than the items noted in the following table. In addition to the commitments noted there, standby letters of credit totaling $1.3 million have been issued, primarily to support self-insured workers compensation bonding requirements. In the event the bank chooses not to renew the company’s line of credit, the letters of credit would cease and alternative methods of support for the insurance obligations would be necessary, would be more expensive and would require additional cash outlays. Management believes the chances of this are remote. A summary of the obligations and commitments at January 31, 2010, and for the next five years is shown below.

			Less						More
			than		1-3		3-5		than
Dollars in thousands	Total		1 year		years		years		5 years
Contractual Obligations:
Line of credit(a)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Operating leases		304		234		70		—		—
Postretirement benefits		5,512		229		528		599		4,156
Unconditional purchase obligations		42,359		42,359		—		—		—
Uncertain tax positions(b)		—		—		—		—		—
	$	48,175	$	42,822	$	598	$	599	$	4,156

(a)	$8.0 million line bears interest at 4.0% as of January 31, 2010, and expires September 2010. The line of credit is reduced by outstanding letters of credit totaling $1.3 million.
(b)	The total liability for uncertain tax positions at January 31, 2010, was $3.5 million. The company is not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future payments relating to non-current tax benefits.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Critical accounting policies are those that require the application of judgment when valuing assets and liabilities on the company’s balance sheet. These policies are discussed below, because a fluctuation in actual results versus expected results could materially affect operating results and because the policies require significant judgments and estimates to be made. Accounting related to these policies is initially based on best estimates at the time of original entry in the accounting records. Adjustments are periodically recorded when the company’s actual experience differs from the expected experience underlying the estimates. These adjustments could be material if experience

28 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

were to change significantly in a short period of time. The company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. However, Raven has used derivative financial instruments to manage the economic impact of fluctuations in currency exchange rates on transactions that are denominated in currency other than its functional currency, which is the U.S. dollar. The use of these financial instruments had no material effect on the company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Inventories

Raven’s most significant accounting judgment is determining inventory value at the lower of cost or market. The company estimates inventory valuation each quarter. Typically, when a product reaches the end of its life cycle, inventory value declines slowly or the product has alternative uses. Management uses its manufacturing resources planning data to help determine if inventory is slow-moving or has become obsolete due to an engineering change. The company closely reviews items that have balances in excess of the prior year’s requirements, or that have been dropped from production requirements. Despite these reviews, technological or strategic decisions made by management or Raven’s customers may result in unexpected excess material. Electronic Systems typically has recourse to customers for obsolete or excess material. When Electronic Systems customers authorize inventory purchases—especially with long lead-time items—they are required to take delivery of unused material or compensate the company accordingly. In every Raven operating unit, management must manage obsolete inventory risk. The accounting judgment ultimately made is an evaluation of the success that management will have in controlling inventory risk and mitigating the impact of obsolescence when it does occur.

Warranties

Estimated warranty liability costs are based on historical warranty costs and average time elapsed between purchases and returns for each business segment. Warranty issues that are unusual in nature are accrued for individually.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Determining the level of the allowance for doubtful accounts requires management’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses based on historical writeoff experience by segment and an estimate of the collectibility of any known problem accounts. Factors that are considered beyond historical experience include the length of time the receivables are outstanding, the current business climate and the customer’s current financial condition.

Revenue Recognition

The company recognizes and records revenue when products are shipped because there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is determinable, collectibility is reasonably assured and delivery has occurred. Estimated returns, sales allowances or warranty charges are recognized upon shipment of a product. The company sells directly to customers or distributors that incur the expense and commitment for any post-sale obligations beyond stated warranty terms.

Goodwill

Management assesses goodwill for impairment annually—or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired—using fair value measurement techniques. For goodwill, Raven performs impairment reviews by reporting units. Reporting units are the company’s reportable segments, except that Aerostar’s goodwill is related specifically to its high-altitude research balloon operation and is accordingly evaluated independently from Aerostar’s other operations.

In the first step of goodwill impairment testing, the corporate discount rate is calculated so that the discounted cash flows are equal to Raven’s net enterprise value. The corporate discount rate is then increased when evaluating any individual reporting unit due to any additional risk factors inherent within the unit versus the corporation as a whole. A discounted cash flow analysis is then completed for the reporting unit using the adjusted discount rate. The discounted cash flow assumptions primarily include forecasted sales and costs and the discount rate. Management evaluates the merits of each significant assumption used to determine the fair value of the reporting unit.

The estimated fair value of the reporting unit is then compared with its net assets. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the net assets of the reporting unit, an impairment loss is possible and a more refined measurement of the impairment loss would take place. This is the second step of the goodwill impairment testing, in which management may use market comparisons and recent transactions to assign the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit. The valuation methodologies in both steps of goodwill impairment testing use significant estimates and assumptions, which include projected future cash flows (including timing and the risks inherent in future cash flows), perpetual growth rates and determination of appropriate market comparables.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 29

Financial Review and Analysis (continued)

Based on the analysis performed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the fair values of each of the company’s reporting units were in excess of their carrying values by more than 60%; therefore, no impairment indicators were noted through the step one impairment analysis, and a step two analysis was not considered necessary.

Long-lived Assets

For long-lived assets—including intangibles; investments in affiliates; and property, plant and equipment—management tests for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset’s carrying amount may not be recoverable. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated over the estimated lives of the assets using accelerated methods, which reduces the likelihood of an impairment loss. Management periodically discusses any significant changes in the utilization of long-lived assets, which may result from—but are not limited to—an adverse change in the asset’s physical condition or a significant adverse change in the business climate. For purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment loss, a long-lived asset is grouped with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted cash flows used in determining its fair value.

Uncertain Tax Positions

Accounting for tax positions requires judgments, including estimating reserves for uncertainties associated with the interpretation of income tax laws and regulations and the resolution of tax positions with tax authorities after discussions and negotiations. The ultimate outcome of these matters could result in material favorable or unfavorable adjustments to the consolidated financial statements.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the Accounting Standards Codification (Codification), which became the single source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States, other than rules and interpretive releases issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Codification is a reorganization of current GAAP into a topical format that eliminates the current GAAP hierarchy and instead establishes two levels of guidance: authoritative and non-authoritative. All non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature that is not included in the Codification became non-authoritative. The company adopted the Codification in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, which resulted in no changes to the content of the company’s financial statements or disclosures.

At the beginning of fiscal 2010, the company adopted FASB guidance that amends required disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities. This guidance requires enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why derivative instruments are used; (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for; and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

At the beginning of fiscal 2010, the company adopted FASB guidance that amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets and apply to (1) intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets and (2) intangible assets acquired in both business combinations and asset acquisitions. Entities estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset must consider their historical experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements or, in the absence of historical experience, must consider assumptions that market participants would use about renewal or extension. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB amended its guidance on accounting for variable interest entities. This guidance alters the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, and requires companies to more frequently assess whether they must consolidate variable interest entities. The guidance is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009, and for interim periods within that first annual reporting period. The adoption of this guidance on February 1, 2010, is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance on the accounting for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable; eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method; and requires a vendor to determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner consistent with that used to determine the selling price of the deliverable on a stand-alone basis. This guidance also expands the required disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The guidance is effective beginning February 1, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The company has adopted the new guidance prospectively from the beginning of the fiscal year and determined that there is no material impact on its consolidated results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or disclosures, as the company had no significant multiple-deliverable arrangements during or at the end of the fiscal year.

30 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

Monthly Closing Stock Price and Volume

Quarterly Information (Unaudited)

			Gross Profit										Net Income				Common Stock				Cash
Dollars in thousands,	Net		As		As		Operating		Pretax		Net		Per Share (b)				Market Price				Dividends
except per-share data	Sales		Reported		Reclassified(a)		Income		Income		Income		Basic		Diluted		High		Low		Per Share
FISCAL 2010
First Quarter	$	65,222	$	18,970	$	20,428	$	14,113	$	14,114	$	9,231	$	0.51	$	0.51	$	24.65	$	15.37	$	0.13
Second Quarter		56,586		13,821		15,112		9,306		9,411		6,204		0.34		0.34		31.00		23.99		0.14
Third Quarter		60,158		15,510		16,918		11,119		11,116		7,293		0.40		0.40		32.43		24.47		0.14
Fourth Quarter		55,816		14,034		15,394		8,682		8,681		5,846		0.32		0.32		33.18		24.04		0.14
Total Year	$	237,782	$	62,335	$	67,852	$	43,220	$	43,322	$	28,574	$	1.58	$	1.58	$	33.18	$	15.37	$	0.55
FISCAL 2009
First Quarter	$	75,166	$	22,015	$	23,288	$	16,641	$	16,759	$	10,882	$	0.60	$	0.60	$	32.80	$	25.94	$	0.13
Second Quarter		69,278		15,786		17,197		10,312		10,488		6,815		0.38		0.38		39.50		29.46		0.13
Third Quarter		75,538		18,001		19,564		12,371		12,548		8,385		0.47		0.46		47.82		25.79		0.13
Fourth Quarter		59,931		12,079		13,399		7,070		7,106		4,688		0.26		0.26		33.24		20.60		1.38	(c)
Total Year	$	279,913	$	67,881	$	73,448	$	46,394	$	46,901	$	30,770	$	1.71	$	1.70	$	47.82	$	20.60	$	1.77
FISCAL 2008
First Quarter	$	58,103	$	17,374	$	18,400	$	12,838	$	13,025	$	8,540	$	0.41	$	0.47	$	30.84	$	26.20	$	0.11
Second Quarter		55,653		13,407		14,445		8,543		8,857		5,843		0.32		0.32		39.36		28.39		0.11
Third Quarter		61,842		15,299		16,504		10,940		11,254		7,398		0.41		0.41		45.85		33.42		0.11
Fourth Quarter		58,359		13,068		14,327		8,824		9,088		6,021		0.33		0.33		42.75		27.57		0.11
Total Year	$	233,957	$	59,148	$	63,676	$	41,145	$	42,224	$	27,802	$	1.54	$	1.53	$	45.85	$	26.20	$	0.44

(a)	All quarters reflect the reclassification of R&D expense from cost of goods sold. (See Note 1.)
(b)	Net income per share is computed discretely by quarter and may not add to the full year.
(c)	A special dividend of $1.25 per share was paid during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 31

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has assessed our internal control over financial reporting in relation to criteria described in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment using those criteria, we concluded that, as of January 31, 2010, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2010, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears on page 46 of this Annual Report.

Ronald M. Moquist	Thomas Iacarella
President & Chief Executive Officer	Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2010

32 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	As of January 31
Dollars in thousands, except per-share data	2010		2009		2008
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	40,684	$	16,267	$	21,272
Short-term investments		3,000		—		1,500
Accounts receivable, net		34,327		40,278		36,538
Inventories		34,475		35,977		36,529
Deferred income taxes		2,471		2,542		2,075
Other current assets		2,790		3,009		2,955
Total current assets		117,747		98,073		100,869
Property, plant and equipment, net		33,029		35,880		35,743
Goodwill		10,699		7,450		6,902
Other assets, net		8,834		3,012		4,347
Total assets	$	170,309	$	144,415	$	147,861
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	12,398	$	9,433	$	8,374
Accrued liabilities		12,256		13,281		12,804
Customer advances		1,306		608		930
Total current liabilities		25,960		23,322		22,108
Other liabilities		11,098		7,537		7,478
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity		133,251		113,556		118,275
Common shares, par value $1.00 per share Authorized—100,000,000 Outstanding—2010: 18,029,733; 2009: 18,012,251 2008: 18,120,513
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	170,309	$	144,415	$	147,861

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 33

Consolidated Statements of Income

	For the years ended January 31
Dollars in thousands, except per-share data	2010			2009			2008
Net sales	$	237,782		$	279,913		$	233,957
Cost of goods sold		169,930			206,465			170,281
Gross profit		67,852			73,448			63,676
Research and development expenses		5,843			5,848			4,925
Selling, general and administrative expenses		18,789			21,206			17,606
Operating income		43,220			46,394			41,145
Interest income and other, net		(102	)		(507	)		(1,079	)
Income before income taxes		43,322			46,901			42,224
Income taxes		14,748			16,131			14,422
Net income	$	28,574		$	30,770		$	27,802
Net income per common share:
—Basic	$	1.58		$	1.71		$	1.54
—Diluted	$	1.58		$	1.70		$	1.53

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

34 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income

																Accumulated
	$1 Par															other
	common			Paid-in			Treasury stock						Retained			comprehensive
Dollars in thousands, except per-share data	stock			capital			Shares			Cost			earnings			income (loss)			Total
Balance January 31, 2007	$	32,307		$	2,341			(14,267,433	)	$	(47,590	)	$	113,103		$	(1,893	)	$	98,268
Net income		—			—			—			—			27,802			—			27,802
Postretirement benefits, net of $84 income tax		—			—			—			—			—			156			156
Foreign currency translation		—			—			—			—			—			131			131
Total comprehensive income																				28,089
Change in accounting for uncertain tax positions		—			—			—			—			(716	)		—			(716	)
Dividends ( $.44 per share)		—			4			—			—			(7,970	)		—			(7,966	)
Purchase of stock		—			—			(20,150	)		(592	)		—			—			(592	)
Stock surrendered upon exercise of stock options		(47	)		(1,462	)		—			—			—			—			(1,509	)
Employees’ stock options exercised		148			1,170			—			—			—			—			1,318
Share-based compensation		—			904			—			—			—			—			904
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options		—			479			—			—			—			—			479
Balance January 31, 2008		32,408			3,436			(14,287,583	)		(48,182	)		132,219			(1,606	)		118,275
Net income		—			—			—			—			30,770			—			30,770
Postretirement benefits, net of $375 income tax		—			—			—			—			—			698			698
Foreign currency translation		—			—			—			—			—			(246	)		(246	)
Total comprehensive income																				31,222
Dividends ($.52 per share)		—			7			—			—			(9,381	)		—			(9,374	)
Dividends (special—$1.25 per share)		—			18			—			—			(22,528	)		—			(22,510	)
Purchase of stock		—			—			(161,100	)		(5,180	)		—			—			(5,180	)
Stock surrendered upon exercise of stock options		(34	)		(1,258	)		—			—			—			—			(1,292	)
Employees’ stock options exercised		83			1,176			—			—			—			—			1,259
Share-based compensation		4			1,024			—			—			—			—			1,028
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options		—			128			—			—			—			—			128
Balance January 31, 2009		32,461			4,531			(14,448,683	)		(53,362	)		131,080			(1,154	)		113,556
Net income		—			—			—			—			28,574			—			28,574
Postretirement benefits, net of ($122) income tax		—			—			—			—			—			(226	)		(226	)
Foreign currency translation		—			—			—			—			—			179			179
Total comprehensive income																				28,527
Dividends ( $.55 per share)		—			11			—			—			(9,922	)		—			(9,911	)
Stock surrendered upon exercise of stock options		(51	)		(1,319	)		—			—			—			—			(1,370	)
Employees’ stock options exercised		65			1,374			—			—			—			—			1,439
Share-based compensation		3			1,031			—			—			—			—			1,034
Tax cost from exercise of stock options		—			(24	)		—			—			—			—			(24	)
Balance January 31, 2010	$	32,478		$	5,604			(14,448,683	)	$	(53,362	)	$	149,732		$	(1,201	)	$	133,251

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 35

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	For the years ended January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010			2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	28,574		$	30,770		$	27,802
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		6,611			7,345			6,944
Amortization of intangible assets		497			413			400
Change in fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration		94			—			—
Provision for losses on accounts receivable, net of recoveries		(183	)		629			91
Deferred income taxes		95			216			(779	)
Share-based compensation expense		1,034			1,028			904
Change in operating assets and liabilities		10,935			(1,346	)		(8,187	)
Other operating activities, net		(14	)		(18	)		(24	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		47,643			39,037			27,151
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(3,302	)		(8,001	)		(6,635	)
Purchases of short-term investments		(3,500	)		(2,100	)		(3,100	)
Sales of short-term investments		500			3,600			5,600
Purchase of equity investment		(5,000	)		—			—
Payments related to business acquisitions		(2,000	)		(488	)		(269	)
Other investing activities, net		(94	)		(11	)		(29	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(13,396	)		(7,000	)		(4,433	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Dividends paid		(9,911	)		(31,884	)		(7,966	)
Purchases of treasury stock		—			(5,180	)		(592	)
Excess tax benefit on stock option exercises		—			128			479
Other financing activities, net		44			(33	)		(191	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(9,867	)		(36,969	)		(8,270	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		37			(73	)		41
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		24,417			(5,005	)		14,489
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		16,267			21,272			6,783
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	40,684		$	16,267		$	21,272

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

36 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

Notes to Financial Statements

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Raven Industries, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the company or Raven). The company is an industrial manufacturer providing a variety of products to customers within the industrial, agricultural, construction and military/aerospace markets, primarily in North America. Raven operates three divisions (Applied Technology [formerly known as Flow Controls], Engineered Films and Electronic Systems) in addition to three wholly owned subsidiaries: Aerostar International, Inc. (Aerostar); Raven Industries Canada, Inc. (Raven Canada); and Raven Industries GmbH (Raven GmbH). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Certain amounts in the prior years’ consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. In the past, research and development expense was included in cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses on the face of the Consolidated Statements of Income. For the current year’s Consolidated Statements of Income “research and development expenses” is a separate line item.

INVESTMENT IN AFFILIATE

An affiliate investment over which the company has significant influence, but neither a controlling interest nor a majority interest in the risks or rewards of the investee, is accounted for using the equity method. The investment balance is included in “other assets, net.” The company considers whether the value of any of its equity method investments has been impaired whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate that recorded values may not be recoverable. If the company considered any such decline to be other than temporary (based on various factors, including historical financial results, product development activities and the overall health of the affiliate’s industry), a write-down would be recorded.

USE OF ESTIMATES

Preparing the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

FOREIGN CURRENCY

The company’s subsidiaries that operate outside the United States use the local currency as their functional currency. The functional currency is translated into U.S. dollars for balance sheet accounts using the period-end exchange rates and average exchange rates for the statement of income. Adjustments resulting from financial statement translations are included as foreign currency translation adjustments in “accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” within shareholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains or losses are recognized in the period incurred and are included in “interest income and other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three or fewer months to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalent balances are principally concentrated in checking, money market and savings accounts with Wells Fargo Bank; Wells Fargo Brokerage Services, LLC. and Merrill Lynch & Co. (Bank of America).

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses. This is based on historical writeoff experience by segment and an estimate of the collectibility of any known problem accounts.

INVENTORY VALUATION

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined on the first-in, first-out basis. Market value encompasses consideration of all business factors including price, contract terms and usefulness.

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets using accelerated methods. The estimated useful lives used for computing depreciation are as follows:

Building and improvements	15 — 39 years
Manufacturing equipment by segment
Applied Technology.	3 — 5 years
Engineered Films	5 — 12 years
Electronic Systems	3 — 5 years
Aerostar	3 — 5 years
Furniture, fixtures, office equipment and other	3 — 7 years

Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense in the year incurred, and renewals and betterments are capitalized. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets sold or disposed of are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.

The company capitalizes certain costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining internal-use software in accordance with the accounting guidance for such costs. Capitalized software costs totaled $855,000 in fiscal 2010 and $297,000 in fiscal 2009. There were no capitalized software costs in fiscal 2008. The costs are included in “property, plant and equipment, net” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Software costs that do not meet capitalization criteria are expensed as incurred. There was no amortization

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 37

Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

expense related to capitalized software in fiscal 2010, 2009 or 2008, and future amortization expense will be included in depreciation.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets, primarily comprised of technologies acquired through acquisition, are recorded at cost and are presented net of accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 20 years. The straight-line method of amortization reflects an appropriate allocation of the cost of the intangible assets to earnings in each reporting period.

GOODWILL

Raven recognizes goodwill as the excess cost of an acquired entity over the net amount assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. For business combinations prior to February 1, 2009, earn-out payments to sellers are added to goodwill when payable under the terms of the purchase agreement. For business combinations after February 1, 2009, earn-out payments are accrued at fair value as of the purchase date, and payments reduce the accrual without affecting goodwill. Any change in the fair value of the contingent consideration after the acquisition date is recognized in the statements of income. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter and between annual tests whenever there is an impairment indicated. Impairment tests of goodwill are performed at the reporting unit level. Fair values are estimated based on discounted cash flows and are compared with the corresponding carrying value of the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, the amount of the impairment loss must be measured and then recognized to the extent the carrying value exceeds the implied fair value.

LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The company periodically assesses the recoverability of long-lived and intangible assets. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted cash flows used in determining the fair value of the assets. The amount of the impairment loss to be recorded is calculated by the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value.

INSURANCE OBLIGATIONS

Raven employs insurance policies to cover workers’ compensation and general liability costs. Liabilities are accrued related to claims filed and estimates for claims incurred but not reported. To the extent these obligations will be reimbursed by insurance, the expected insurance policy benefit is included as a component of “other current assets.”

CONTINGENCIES

The company is involved as a defendant in lawsuits, claims or disputes arising in the normal course of business. An estimate of the loss on these matters is charged to operations when it is

probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. While the settlement of any claims cannot be determined at this time, management believes that any liability resulting from these claims will be substantially covered by insurance. Accordingly, management does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these matters will have a significant impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Raven recognizes revenue when products are shipped because there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and delivery has occurred. The company sells directly to customers or distributors who incur the expense and commitment for any post-sale obligations beyond stated warranty terms. Estimated returns, sales allowances or warranty charges are recognized upon shipment of a product. Shipping and handling costs are classified as a component of “cost of goods sold.”

OPERATING EXPENSES

The primary types of operating expenses are classified in the income statement as follows:

	Research and	Selling, general and
Cost of goods sold	development expenses	administrative expenses
Direct material costs	Personnel costs	Personnel costs
Material acquisition and	Professional service fees	Professional service fees
handling costs	Material and supplies	Advertising
Direct labor	Facility allocation	Promotions
Factory overhead		Information technology
including depreciation		equipment depreciation
Inventory obsolescence		Office supplies
Product warranties

Research and development expenses include costs related to product development and significant enhancements of existing products. Gross margins were affected by the reclassification of research and development expenses out of cost of goods sold to a separate item below gross profit. Additionally, R&D expenses that were previously classified as selling, general and administrative expenses were also reclassified to the separate R&D expenses line. The reclassification had no affect on any segment’s previously reported operating income or consolidated operating income.

38 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

Components of consolidated operating income for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 and 2008, as originally reported and as reclassified, were as follows:

	For the year ended						For the year ended
	January 31, 2009						January 31, 2008
	As			As			As			As
Dollars in thousands	reported			reclassified			reported			reclassified
Net sales	$	279,913		$	279,913		$	233,957		$	233,957
Cost of goods sold		212,032			206,465			174,809			170,281
Gross profit		67,881			73,448			59,148			63,676
Gross margins		24.3	%		26.2	%		25.3	%		27.2	%
Research and development expenses		—			5,848			—			4,925
Selling, general and administrative expenses		21,487			21,206			18,003			17,606
Operating income	$	46,394		$	46,394		$	41,145		$	41,145

The company’s gross margins may not be comparable to industry peers due to variability in the classification of these expenses across the industries in which the company operates.

WARRANTIES

Accruals necessary for product warranties are estimated based on historical warranty costs and average time elapsed between purchases and returns for each division. Additional accruals are made for any significant, discrete warranty issues.

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The company records compensation expense related to its share-based compensation plans using the fair value method.

INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes reflect temporary differences between assets and liabilities reported on the company’s balance sheet and their tax bases. These differences are measured using enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods when the temporary differences will affect taxable income. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to reflect realizable value, when necessary. Accruals are maintained for uncertain tax positions.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the Accounting Standards Codification (Codification), which became the single source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States, other than rules and interpretive releases issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Codification is a reorganization of current GAAP into a topical format that eliminates the current GAAP hierarchy and instead establishes two levels of guidance: authoritative and non-authoritative. All non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature that is not included in the Codification became non-authoritative. The company adopted the Codification in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, which resulted in no changes to the content of the company’s financial statements or disclosures.

At the beginning of fiscal 2010, the company adopted FASB guidance that amends required disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities. This guidance requires enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why derivative instruments are used; (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for; and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

At the beginning of fiscal 2010, the company adopted FASB guidance that amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets and apply to (1) intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets and (2) intangible assets acquired in both business combinations and asset acquisitions. Entities estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset must consider their historical experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements or, in the absence of historical experience, must consider assumptions that market participants would use about renewal or extension. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB amended its guidance on accounting for variable interest entities. This guidance alters the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, and requires companies to more frequently assess whether they must consolidate variable interest entities. The guidance is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009, and for interim periods within that first annual reporting period. The adoption of this guidance on February 1, 2010, is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance on the accounting for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable; eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method; and requires a vendor to determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner consistent with that used to determine the selling price of the deliverable on a stand-alone basis. This guidance also expands the required disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The guidance is effective beginning February 1, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The company has adopted the new guidance prospectively from the beginning of

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 39

Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

the fiscal year and determined that there is no material impact on its consolidated results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or disclosures, as the company had no significant multiple-deliverable arrangements during or at the end of the fiscal year.

Note 2. Selected Balance Sheet Information

Following are the components of selected balance sheet items:

	As of January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010			2009			2008
Accounts receivable, net:
Trade accounts	$	34,624		$	40,891		$	36,831
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(297	)		(613	)		(293	)
	$	34,327		$	40,278		$	36,538
Inventories:
Finished goods	$	6,283		$	6,062		$	4,975
In process		4,172			3,258			3,631
Materials		24,020			26,657			27,923
	$	34,475		$	35,977		$	36,529
Other current assets:
Insurance policy benefit	$	2,300		$	2,119		$	2,549
Prepaid expenses and other		490			890			406
	$	2,790		$	3,009		$	2,955
Property, plant and equipment, net:
Land	$	1,227		$	1,227		$	1,227
Buildings and improvements		22,973			22,593			21,523
Machinery and equipment		64,119			62,504			57,563
Accumulated depreciation		(55,290	)		(50,444	)		(44,570	)
	$	33,029		$	35,880		$	35,743
Other assets, net:
Amortizable assets:
Purchased technology	$	3,200		$	2,300		$	2,300
Other intangibles		1,633			1,314			1,172
Accumulated amortization		(2,648	)		(2,143	)		(1,740	)
		2,185			1,471			1,732
Investment in affiliate		5,010			—			—
Deferred income taxes		1,580			1,482			2,540
Other, net		59			59			75
	$	8,834		$	3,012		$	4,347
Accrued liabilities:
Salaries and benefits	$	1,148		$	1,891		$	2,109
Vacation		2,693			2,581			2,415
401(k) contributions		180			1,333			1,184
Insurance obligations		3,959			3,615			4,010
Profit sharing		217			436			490
Warranties		1,259			1,004			684
Taxes—accrued and withheld		1,574			1,266			1,061
Other		1,226			1,155			851
	$	12,256		$	13,281		$	12,804
Other liabilities:
Postretirement benefits	$	5,283		$	4,637		$	5,246
Acquisition-related contingent consideration		2,301			—			—
Uncertain tax positions		3,514			2,900			2,232
	$	11,098		$	7,537		$	7,478

Note 3. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income refers to revenue, expenses, gains and losses that under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles are recorded as an element of shareholders’ equity but are excluded from net income. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are shown below:

	As of January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010			2009			2008
Foreign currency translation	$	56		$	(123	)	$	123
Post-retirement benefits		(1,257	)		(1,031	)		(1,729	)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(1,201	)	$	(1,154	)	$	(1,606	)

Note 4. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

	For the years ended January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010			2009			2008
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	$	6,325		$	(4,603	)	$	(5,216	)
Inventories		1,552			447			(8,403	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(49	)		(35	)		218
Accounts payable		2,934			963			2,437
Accrued and other liabilities		(520	)		2,194			2,648
Customer advances		693			(312	)		129
	$	10,935		$	(1,346	)	$	(8,187	)
Cash paid during the year for income taxes	$	13,816		$	15,072		$	14,068

Note 5. Acquisition of and Investments in Businesses and Technologies

In November 2009, the company acquired a 20% interest in Site-Specific Technology Development Group, Inc. (SST) for $5.0 million. SST is a privately held agricultural software development and information services provider. Raven and SST are strategically aligned to provide customers with simple, more efficient ways to move and manage information in the precision agriculture market. As of January 31, 2010, the company’s investment balance is included in “other assets, net” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The company accounts for its interest in SST using the equity method of accounting. At January 31, 2010, the carrying value of the investment in SST exceeded the company’s share of the underlying net assets of SST by $5.0 million. A portion of the excess relates to $1.1 million of technology-related assets that are amortized over a seven-year period. The remainder of the excess is attributable to goodwill.

In November 2009, the company purchased substantially all of the assets of Ranchview, Inc., a privately held Canadian corporation for $1.5 million cash and contingent consideration valued at $2.3 million. Raven has agreed to pay additional consideration on a quarterly basis of 6% on future sales of Ranchview products, up to a maximum payment of $4 million. Any change in the fair value of the contingent consideration after the acquisition date will be recognized in the statements of income. Ranchview, a start-up

40 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

company, developed products that use cellular networks instead of the traditional radio systems that are typically used to deliver RTK (Real Time Kinematic) corrections to GPS enabled equipment. RTK corrections improve the accuracy of GPS equipment. The network can also be used to provide high-speed Internet access.

The allocation of the purchase price is summarized below:

Dollars in thousands
Goodwill	$	2,734
Existing technology		900
Other intangibles		175
Total	$	3,809

The goodwill associated with Ranchview is deductible for tax purposes. Purchased identifiable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their respected useful lives. The estimated useful life is six years for existing technology and five to seven years for the remaining intangibles.

The results of operations of Ranchview for periods prior to the company’s acquisition were not material to the company’s Consolidated Statements of Income and, accordingly, pro forma results of operations have not been presented. This operation has been combined into the Applied Technology Division.

Note 6. Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting segment are shown below:

	Applied		Engineered		Electronic
Dollars in thousands	Technology		Films		Systems		Aerostar		Total
Balance at January 31, 2007	$	5,611	$	96	$	433	$	464	$	6,604
Acquisition earn-outs		298		—		—		—		298
Balance at January 31, 2008		5,909		96		433		464		6,902
Acquisition earn-outs		548		—		—		—		548
Balance at January 31, 2009		6,457		96		433		464		7,450
Goodwill acquired during the year		2,734		—		—		—		2,734
Acquisition earn-outs		515		—		—		—		515
Balance at January 31, 2010	$	9,706	$	96	$	433	$	464	$	10,699

Intangible Assets

Estimated future amortization expense based on the current carrying value of amortizable intangible assets for fiscal periods 2011 through 2015 is $610,000, $581,000, $225,000, $219,000 and $187,000, respectively.

Note 7. Employee Retirement Benefits

The company has a 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees. Prior to January 1, 2010, the company contributed 3% of qualified payroll. Starting January 1, 2010, the company began matching employee contributions up to a maximum of 4% of pay. Raven’s contribution expense was $1,085,000, $1,158,000 and $1,020,000 for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

In addition, the company provides postretirement medical and other benefits to senior executive officers and senior managers. There are no assets held for the plans and any obligations are covered through operating cash and investments.

The accumulated benefit obligation for these benefits is shown below:

	For the years ended January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010			2009			2008
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	4,840		$	5,447		$	5,213
Service cost		55			67			90
Interest cost		332			361			307
Actuarial (gain) loss and assumption changes		476			(847	)		(2	)
Total recognized in net and other comprehensive income		863			(419	)		395
Retiree benefits paid		(191	)		(188	)		(161	)
Benefit obligation at end of year	$	5,512		$	4,840		$	5,447

The liability and expense reflected in the balance sheet and income statement were as follows:

	For the years ended January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010			2009			2008
Beginning liability balance	$	4,840		$	5,447		$	5,213
Employer expense		515			654			635
Other comprehensive (income) loss		348			(1,073	)		(240	)
Total recognized in net and other comprehensive income		863			(419	)		395
Retiree benefits paid		(191	)		(188	)		(161	)
Ending liability balance		5,512			4,840			5,447
Current portion		(229	)		(203	)		(201	)
Long-term portion	$	5,283		$	4,637		$	5,246
Assumptions used:
Discount rate		6.00	%		7.00	%		6.75	%
Wage inflation rate		3.00	%		3.00	%		4.00	%

The discount rate is based on matching rates of return on high-quality fixed-income investments with the timing and amount of expected benefit payments. No material fluctuations in retiree benefit payments are expected in future years.

The assumed health care cost trend rate for fiscal 2010 was 9.51% compared with 8.97% and 10.38% for fiscal 2009 and 2008. The impact of a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care rates would not be significant to the company’s income statement and would affect the ending liability balance by approximately $800,000. The rate to which the fiscal 2010 health care cost trend rate is assumed to decline is 4.50%, which is the ultimate trend rate. The fiscal year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate is expected to be fiscal 2030.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 41

Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

Note 8. Warranties

Changes in the warranty accrual were as follows:

	As of January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010			2009			2008
Beginning balance	$	1,004		$	684		$	397
Accrual for warranties		2,426			2,760			1,390
Settlements made (in cash or in kind)		(2,171	)		(2,440	)		(1,103	)
Ending balance	$	1,259		$	1,004		$	684

Note 9. Income Taxes

The reconciliation of income tax computed at the federal statutory rate to the company’s effective income tax rate was as follows:

	For the years ended January 31
	2010			2009			2008
Tax at U.S. federal statutory rate		35.0	%		35.0	%		35.0	%
State and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal benefit		1.3			1.5			1.5
Tax benefit on qualified production activities		(2.1	)		(2.0	)		(2.1	)
Tax credit for research activities		(0.7	)		(0.7	)		(0.7	)
Other, net		0.5			0.6			0.5
		34.0	%		34.4	%		34.2	%

Significant components of the company’s income tax provision were as follows:

	For the years ended January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010		2009		2008
Income taxes:
Currently payable	$	14,653	$	15,915	$	15,201
Deferred		95		216		(779	)
	$	14,748	$	16,131	$	14,422

Deferred Tax Assets

Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.

Significant components of the company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:

	As of January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010			2009			2008
Current deferred tax assets:
Accounts receivable	$	103		$	211		$	105
Inventories		344			408			271
Accrued vacation		857			840			781
Insurance obligations		553			489			456
Warranty obligations		441			352			225
Other accrued liabilities		173			242			237
		2,471			2,542			2,075
Non-current deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Postretirement benefits		1,849			1,623			1,836
Depreciation and amortization		(1,970	)		(1,556	)		(478	)
Uncertain tax positions		1,180			969			741
Other		521			446			441
		1,580			1,482			2,540
Net deferred tax asset	$	4,051		$	4,024		$	4,615

Pre-tax book income for the U.S. companies was $42.8 million and was $569,000 for the Canadian subsidiary. As of January 31, 2010, undistributed earnings of the Canadian subsidiary were considered to have been reinvested indefinitely and, accordingly, the company has not provided United States income taxes on such earnings.

Uncertain Tax Positions

Effective February 1, 2007, Raven adopted new guidance for accounting for unrecognized tax benefits. Upon adoption, the company reported a net $716,000 increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was recorded as a reduction to the February 1, 2007 beginning retained earnings balance.

A summary of the activity related to the gross unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest and penalties) is as follows:

	For the years ended January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010			2009			2008
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year	$	2,269		$	1,793		$	1,328
Increases in tax positions related to the current year		463			539			465
Decreases as a result of a lapse in applicable statute of limitations		(76	)		(63	)		—
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of year	$	2,656		$	2,269		$	1,793

During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, the only change to uncertain tax positions related to prior years resulted from the lapse of a statute of limitations. The company does not expect any significant change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next fiscal year.

The total unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the company’s effective tax rate were $1.7 million, $1.5 million and $1.2 million as of January 31, 2010, January 31, 2009, and January 31, 2008, respectively.

42 2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN

The company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. At January 31, 2010, January 31, 2009, and January 31, 2008, accrued interest and penalties were $858,000, $631,000 and $439,000, respectively.

The company files tax returns, including returns for its subsidiaries, with various federal, state and local jurisdictions. Uncertain tax positions are related to tax years that remain subject to examination. As of January 31, 2010, federal tax returns filed in the U.S., Canada and Switzerland for fiscal years ended January 31, 2007 — 2009 remain subject to examination by federal tax authorities. In state and local jurisdictions, tax returns for fiscal years ended January 31, 2004 — 2009 remain subject to examination by state and local tax authorities.

Note 10. Financing Arrangements

Raven has an uncollateralized credit agreement providing a line of credit of $8.0 million with a maturity date of September 1, 2010, bearing interest at the prime rate with a minimum rate of 4.00%. Letters of credit totaling $1.3 million have been issued under the line, primarily to support self-insured workers’ compensation bonding requirements. No borrowings were outstanding as of January 31, 2010, 2009 or 2008, and $6.7 million was available at January 31, 2010. There have been no borrowings under the credit line in the last three fiscal years.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. provides Raven’s line of credit and holds the majority of its cash and cash equivalents. One member of the company’s board of directors is also on the board of directors of Wells Fargo & Co., the parent company of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

The company leases certain vehicles, equipment and facilities under operating leases. Total rent and lease expense was $328,000, $353,000 and $268,000 in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases for fiscal periods 2011 to 2013 are $234,000, $48,000 and $22,000, respectively, with all leases scheduled to expire during fiscal 2013.

Note 11. Share-based Compensation

At January 31, 2010, Raven had two shareholder approved share-based compensation plans, which are described below. The compensation cost for these plans was $1,034,000, $1,028,000 and $904,000 in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The related income tax benefit recorded in the income statement was $184,000, $200,000 and $154,000 for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory is not significant.

2000 Stock Option and Compensation Plan

The 2000 Stock Option and Compensation Plan is administered by the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the board of directors and allows for stock awards and incentive or non-qualified options with terms not to exceed 10 years. Fiscal 2010 compensation cost included $144,000 of expense recognized as a result of a 4,800 share stock award. Fiscal 2009 compensation cost included $135,000 of expense recognized as a result of a 5,500 share stock award. There were 255,025 shares of the company’s common stock reserved for future stock awards and stock option grants under the plan at January 31, 2010. Options are granted with exercise prices not less than market value at the date of grant. The stock options vest over a four-year period and expire after five years. Options contain retirement and change in control provisions that may accelerate the vesting period. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following weighted average assumptions by grant year:

	For the years ended January 31
	2010			2009			2008
Risk-free interest rate		2.03	%		1.64	%		3.07	%
Expected dividend yield		1.73	%		2.12	%		1.28	%
Expected volatility factor		49.69	%		46.32	%		40.62	%
Expected option term (in years)		4.50			4.25			4.25
Weighted average grant date fair value	$	11.28		$	8.08		$	11.45

Option activity for the year ended January 31, 2010, was as follows:

								Weighted
								average
				Weighted		Aggregate		remaining
				average		intrinsic		contractual
	Number			exercise		value		term
	of options			price		(in thousands)		(years)
Outstanding at beginning of year		382,975		$	27.93
Granted		81,200			30.05
Exercised		(65,225	)		22.06
Forfeited		(2,400	)		27.24
Outstanding at end of year		396,550		$	29.33	$	428		2.85
Options exercisable at end of year		187,963		$	29.96	$	129		1.83

The intrinsic value of a stock award is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the award. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $314,000, $1.9 million and $3.5 million during the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. As of January 31, 2010, the total compensation cost for non-vested awards not yet recognized in the company’s statements of income was $1.5 million, net of the effect of estimated forfeitures. This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.62 years.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 43

Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

Deferred Stock Compensation Plan for Directors

The Deferred Stock Compensation Plan for Directors of Raven Industries, Inc. is administered by the Governance Committee of the board of directors. Under the plan, a stock unit is the right to receive one share of the company’s common stock as deferred compensation, to be distributed from an account established by the company in the name of the non-employee director. Stock units have the same value as a share of common stock but cannot be sold. Stock units are a component of the company’s equity. The plan reserves 50,000 common shares for the conversion of stock units into common stock after directors retire from the board.

Stock units granted under this plan vest immediately and are expensed at the date of grant. Stock units are also accumulated if a director elects to defer the annual retainer paid for board service. When dividends are paid on the company’s common shares, stock units are added to the directors’ balances and a corresponding amount is removed from retained earnings. The intrinsic value of a stock unit is the fair value of the underlying shares.

Outstanding stock units for the year ended January 31, 2010, were as follows:

			Weighted
	Number		average
	of units		price
Outstanding at beginning of year		15,107	$	21.81
Granted		4,996		28.02
Deferred retainers		714		28.02
Dividends		409		26.44
Converted into common shares		—		—
Outstanding at end of year		21,226	$	28.58

Note 12. Net Income per Share

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average common shares and stock units outstanding. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average common and common equivalent shares outstanding (which includes the shares issuable upon exercise of employee stock options, net of shares assumed purchased with the option proceeds) and stock units outstanding. Certain outstanding options were excluded from the diluted net income per-share calculations because their effect would have been anti-dilutive, as their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the company’s common stock during those periods. For fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, 338,081, 167,942 and 90,338 options, respectively, were excluded from the diluted net income per-share calculation. Details of the computation are presented below:

	For the years ended January 31
	2010		2009		2008
Numerator:
Net income (in thousands)	$	28,574	$	30,770	$	27,802
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		18,020,552		18,031,020		18,099,600
Weighted average stock units outstanding		19,580		13,451		8,580
Denominator for basic calculation		18,040,132		18,044,471		18,108,180
Weighted average common shares outstanding		18,020,552		18,031,020		18,099,600
Weighted average stock units outstanding		19,580		13,451		8,580
Dilutive impact of stock options		3,304		35,771		95,883
Denominator for diluted calculation		18,043,436		18,080,242		18,204,063
Net income per share—basic	$	1.58	$	1.71	$	1.54
Net income per share—diluted	$	1.58	$	1.70	$	1.53

Note 13. Business Segments and Major Customer Information

The company’s reportable segments are defined by their common technologies, production processes and inventories. These segments reflect Raven’s organization into three Raven divisions and the Aerostar subsidiary. Raven Canada and Raven GmbH are included in the Applied Technology Division. Substantially all of the company’s long-lived assets are located in the United States.

Applied Technology products are electronic and Global Positioning System (GPS) devices. They are used primarily on agricultural sprayers for precision farming applications. The segment has developed products for field location control, chemical injection and automated steering. Engineered Films produces rugged reinforced plastic sheeting for industrial, construction and agriculture applications. Electronic System’s capabilities are focused on electronics manufacturing services (EMS) for commercial customers with a focus on high-mix, low-volume production. Assemblies manufactured by the Electronic Systems segment include avionics, secure communication, environmental controls and other products where high quality is critical. Aerostar sells high-altitude and tethered aerostats for government and commercial research, and military parachutes. It produces uniforms and protective wear for U.S. government agencies as a subcontractor and also manufactures other sewn and sealed products on a contract basis.

The company measures the performance of its segments based on their operating income excluding administrative and general expenses. The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in Note 1, Summary of Significant

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 44

Accounting Policies. Other income, interest expense and income taxes are not allocated to individual operating segments, and assets not identifiable to an individual segment are included as corporate assets. Segment information is reported consistent with the company’s management reporting structure.

Business segment information is as follows:

	For the years ended January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010			2009			2008
APPLIED TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
Sales	$	86,217		$	103,098		$	64,291
Operating income		25,722			33,884			19,102
Assets		51,029			48,881			36,938
Capital expenditures		941			2,674			1,008
Depreciation and amortization		1,677			1,383			1,125
ENGINEERED FILMS DIVISION
Sales	$	63,783		$	89,858		$	85,316
Operating income		10,232			10,919			17,739
Assets		35,999			35,862			43,688
Capital expenditures		1,460			3,120			4,012
Depreciation and amortization		3,707			4,303			4,046
ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS DIVISION
Sales	$	63,525		$	61,983		$	67,987
Operating income		8,979			5,926			10,365
Assets		21,216			26,847			25,865
Capital expenditures		290			1,399			1,077
Depreciation and amortization		939			1,159			1,237
AEROSTAR
Sales	$	27,244		$	27,186		$	17,290
Operating income		5,634			4,219			1,506
Assets		10,462			8,744			9,941
Capital expenditures		332			383			156
Depreciation and amortization		398			444			499
INTERSEGMENT ELIMINATIONS
Sales
Engineered Films Division	$	(210	)	$	(210	)	$	(533	)
Electronic Systems Division		(2,776	)		(1,977	)		(378	)
Aerostar		(1	)		(25	)		(16	)
Operating income		60			(52	)		(100	)
Assets		(92	)		(152	)		(100	)
REPORTABLE SEGMENTS TOTAL
Sales	$	237,782		$	279,913		$	233,957
Operating income		50,627			54,896			48,612
Assets		118,614			120,182			116,332
Capital expenditures		3,023			7,576			6,253
Depreciation and amortization		6,721			7,289			6,907
CORPORATE & OTHER(a)
Operating (loss) from administrative expenses	$	(7,407	)	$	(8,502	)	$	(7,467	)
Assets		51,695			24,233			31,529
Capital expenditures		279			425			382
Depreciation and amortization		387			469			437
TOTAL COMPANY
Sales	$	237,782		$	279,913		$	233,957
Operating income		43,220			46,394			41,145
Assets		170,309			144,415			147,861
Capital expenditures		3,302			8,001			6,635
Depreciation and amortization		7,108			7,758			7,344

(a) Assets are principally cash, investments, deferred taxes and other receivables.

Sales to a customer of the Electronic Systems segment accounted for 16%, 13% and 11% of consolidated sales in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 13%, 18% and 14%, of consolidated accounts receivable at the end of fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Foreign sales are attributed to product delivered to non-U.S. locations. Sales to countries outside the United States, primarily to Canada, were as follows:

	For the years ended January 31
Dollars in thousands	2010		2009		2008
Applied Technology	$	17,140	$	18,847	$	10,104
Engineered Films		1,383		2,034		1,803
Electronic Systems		495		568		6,852
Aerostar		1,219		1,004		1,310
Total foreign sales	$	20,237	$	22,453	$	20,069

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 45

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Raven Industries, Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Raven Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2010 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing on page 32 of the 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Effective February 1, 2007, as described in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for unrecognized tax benefits. As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for business combinations affecting business combinations closing after February 1, 2009.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Minneapolis,Minnesota
March 31, 2010

2010 ANNUAL REPORT RAVEN 46

Investor Information

Annual Meeting
May 25, 2010, 9:00 a.m.
Ramkota Hotel and Conference Center
3200 W. Maple Avenue
Sioux Falls, SD

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

Raven Industries, Inc. sponsors a Dividend Reinvestment Plan so shareholders can purchase additional Raven common stock without paying any brokerage commission or fees. For more information on how you can take advantage of this plan, contact your broker, our stock transfer agent or write to our Investor Relations Department.

Dividend Policy

Our policy is to return a substantial portion of earnings to shareholders through regular dividends. Each year our board of directors reviews Raven’s dividend and will increase it when the new level is sustainable. Fiscal 2010 was the 23nd-consecutive year we raised our annual dividend.

Raven Website
www.ravenind.com

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, MN

Stock Quotations
Listed on the Nasdaq NGS Stock Market—RAVN

Stock Transfer Agent & Registrar
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
161 N. Concord Exchange
P.O. Box 64854 South St. Paul,
MN 55164-0854
Phone: 1-800-468-9716

Form 10-K

Raven Industries, Inc.’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, is available free of charge on the company’s website, or upon written request to the Investor Relations Department.

Affirmative Action Plan

Raven Industries, Inc. and Aerostar International, Inc. are Equal Employment Opportunity Employers with approved affirmative action plans.

Inquiries
Raven Industries, Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
P.O. Box 5107
Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5107
Phone: 605-336-2750

Adding Value for Shareholders

Raven stock continues to outperform its industrial peers and the overall market in shareholder return. Investors who bought $100 of the company’s stock on January 31, 2005, held this for five years and reinvested the dividends, have seen its value increase to $174.24. This 12% cumulative growth rate outpaced the S&P 1500 Industrial Index’s minor loss (at $99.59) and the Russell 2000’s slight gain (to $103.25).

     

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements regarding the expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The company intends that all forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance these assumptions are correct or that these expectations will be achieved. Assumptions involve important risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect results in the future. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to weather conditions and commodity prices, which could affect sales and profitability in some of the company’s primary markets, such as agriculture, construction and oil and gas drilling; or changes in competition, raw material availability, technology or relationships with the company’s largest customers—any of which could adversely affect any of the company’s product lines—as well as other risks described in the company’s 10-K under Item 1A. This list is not exhaustive, and the company does not have an obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date these statements are made.

Design: Creative Design Board, Northbrook, IL

EX-21

Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY	JURISDICTION
Aerostar International, Inc.	South Dakota, USA
GTH, Inc. (formerly known as Glasstite, Inc.)	Minnesota, USA
Raven Industries Canada, Inc.	Nova Scotia, Canada
Raven Industries GmbH	Solothurn, Switzerland

EX-23

Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-38614 and 333-41352) of Raven Industries, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2010 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 31, 2010 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

March 31, 2010 

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald M. Moquist, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Raven Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”);
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or others performing the equivalent function):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report information; and
b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2010	/s/ Ronald M. Moquist
	Ronald M. Moquist
	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas Iacarella, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Raven Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”);
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or others performing the equivalent function):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report information; and
b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2010	/s/ Thomas Iacarella
	Thomas Iacarella
	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ronald M. Moquist, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Raven Industries, Inc., has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of Raven Industries, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 (the “Report”).

The undersigned hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

• the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

• the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raven Industries, Inc.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 31^st day of March 2010.

/s/ Ronald M. Moquist  

Ronald M. Moquist 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

RAVEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Thomas Iacarella, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Raven Industries, Inc., has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of Raven Industries, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 (the “Report”).

The undersigned hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

• the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

• the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raven Industries, Inc.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 31^st day of March 2010.

/s/ Thomas Iacarella  

Thomas Iacarella 

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer