XML 92 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Railcar leasing activities:

The Company is a lessor of railcars. The majority of railcars are leased to customers under operating leases that may be either net leases (where the customer pays for all maintenance) or full service leases (where the Company provides maintenance and fleet management services). The Company also provides such services to financial intermediaries to whom it has sold railcars and locomotives in non-recourse lease transactions. Fleet management services generally include maintenance, escrow, tax filings and car tracking services.

 

Many of the Company's leases provide for renewals. The Company also generally holds purchase options for railcars it has sold and leased-back from a financial intermediary, and railcars sold in non-recourse lease transactions. These purchase options are for stated amounts which are determined at the inception of the lease and are intended to approximate the estimated fair value of the applicable railcars at the date for which such purchase options can be exercised.

Lease income from operating leases (with the Company as lessor) to customers (including month to month and per diem leases) and rental expense for railcar operating leases (with the Company as lessee) were as follows:

 

     Year ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2011      2010      2009  

Rental and service income – operating leases

   $ 68,124       $ 60,700       $ 73,575   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Rental expense

   $ 16,303       $ 20,023       $ 24,271   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Lease income recognized under per diem arrangements (described in Note 1) totaled $2.9 million, $2.6 million and $3.9 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and is included in the amounts above.

Future minimum rentals and service income for all noncancelable railcar operating leases greater than one year are as follows:

 

(in thousands)    Future
Rental
and
Service
Income –
Operating
Leases
     Future
Minimum
Rental
Payments
 

Year ended December 31,

     

2012

   $ 53,848       $ 12,575   

2013

     39,435         9,014   

2014

     26,676         6,572   

2015

     19,756         6,396   

2016

     14,704         6,174   

Future years

     22,923         10,230   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 177,342       $ 50,961   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company also arranges non-recourse lease transactions under which it sells railcars or locomotives to financial intermediaries and assigns the related operating lease on a non-recourse basis. The Company generally provides ongoing railcar maintenance and management services for the financial intermediaries, and receives a fee for such services when earned. Management and service fees earned in 2011, 2010 and 2009 were $2.8 million, $2.9 million and $3.0 million, respectively.

Other leasing activities:

The Company, as a lessee, leases real property, vehicles and other equipment under operating leases. Certain of these agreements contain lease renewal and purchase options. The Company also leases excess property to third parties. Net rental expense under these agreements was $6.3 million, $5.6 million and $5.1 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Future minimum lease payments (net of sublease income commitments) under agreements in effect at December 31, 2011 are as follows: 2012 — $4.2 million; 2013 — $3.0 million; 2014 — $1.8 million; 2015 — $1.3 million; 2016 — $0.4 million; and $1.4 million thereafter.

 

In addition to the above, the Company leases its Albion, Michigan and Clymers, Indiana grain elevators under operating leases to two of its ethanol joint ventures. The Albion, Michigan grain elevator lease expires in 2056. The initial term of the Clymers, Indiana grain elevator lease ends in 2014 and provides for 5 renewals of 7.5 years each. Lease income for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $1.9 million, $1.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

Litigation activities:

The Company is party to litigation, or threats thereof, both as defendant and plaintiff with some regularity, although individual cases that are material in size occur infrequently. As a defendant, the Company establishes reserves for claimed amounts that are considered probable, and capable of estimation. If those cases are resolved for lesser amounts, the excess reserves are taken into income and, conversely, if those cases are resolved for larger than the amount the Company has accrued, the Company records a charge to income. The Company believes it is unlikely that the results of its current legal proceedings for which it is the defendant, even if unfavorable, will be material. As a plaintiff, amounts that are collected can also result in sudden, non-recurring income. Litigation results depend upon a variety of factors, including the availability of evidence, the credibility of witnesses, the performance of counsel, the state of the law, and the impressions of judges and jurors, any of which can be critical in importance, yet difficult, if not impossible, to predict. Consequently, cases currently pending, or future matters, may result in unexpected, and non-recurring losses, or income, from time to time. Finally, litigation results are often subject to judicial reconsideration, appeal and further negotiation by the parties, and as a result, the final impact of a particular judicial decision may be unknown for some time, or may result in continued reserves to account for the potential of such post-verdict actions.

The estimated range of loss for all outstanding claims that are considered reasonably possible of occurring is not significant. There are several pending claims for which the question of loss or the range of loss cannot be estimated at this time, among them the investigation of the Maumee River in Toledo Ohio with which we are cooperating.

In 2011, the Company received a trial verdict in the amount of $3.2 million in a civil suit, for which both the Company and the defendant have subsequently filed appeals. No income has been recorded to-date due to uncertainty of the final amount and overall collectability of any amount against the defendant.