XML 42 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.0.1
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2021
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
(in thousands)TradeRenewablesPlant NutrientTotal
Balance at January 1, 2019
$1,171 $— $686 $1,857 
Acquisitions126,610 2,726 — 129,336 
Balance at December 31, 2019
127,781 2,726 686 131,193 
Reorganization(5,714)5,714 — — 
Acquisitions— 349 — 349 
Balance at December 31, 2020
122,067 8,789 686 131,542 
Disposals (a)(2,200)  (2,200)
Balance at December 31, 2021
$119,867 $8,789 $686 $129,342 
(a) Removal of allocated goodwill due to the sale of the grain asset location in Champaign, Illinois.

Goodwill for the Trade segment is $119.9 million as of December 31, 2021 which is net of prior years' accumulated impairment losses of $46.4 million. Goodwill for the Plant Nutrient segment is $0.7 million, net of accumulated impairment losses of $68.9 million as of December 31, 2021.

The Company had goodwill of approximately $129.3 million at December 31, 2021, which includes approximately $78.5 million related to the Company's Grain Storage and Merchandising ("GSM") reporting unit, approximately $41.3 million related to the Company's Food and Specialty Ingredients ("FSI") reporting unit, approximately $8.8 million related to the Company's Renewables reporting unit and approximately $0.7 million is related to the Lawn reporting unit.

Goodwill is tested for impairment annually as of October 1, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. The Company uses a one-step quantitative approach that compares the business enterprise value ("BEV") of each reporting unit with its carrying value. The BEV was computed based on both an income approach (discounted cash flows) and a market approach. The income approach uses a reporting unit's estimated future cash flows, discounted at the weighted-average cost of capital ("WACC") of a hypothetical third-party buyer. The WACC is the rate used to discount each reporting unit’s estimated future cash flows. The WACC is calculated based on the proportionate weighting of the cost of debt and equity. The cost of equity is based on a risk-free interest rate and an equity risk factor, which is derived from public companies similar to the reporting units and which captures the perceived risks and uncertainties associated with the reporting unit's cash flows. The cost of debt is the rate that a prudent investor would require to lend money to the reporting units on an after tax basis and is estimated based on a market-derived analysis of corporate bond yields. The cost of debt and equity is weighted based on the debt to market capitalization ratio of publicly traded companies with similarities to the reporting units being tested. The WACC applied in each reporting unit's last quantitative test ranged from 8.50% to 11.25%, which includes a company specific risk premium range from 2.0% to 4.0%. Differences in the WACC used between reporting units is primarily due to distinct risks and uncertainties regarding the cash flows of the different reporting units.

The market approach estimates fair value by applying cash flow multiples to the reporting unit's operating performance. The multiples are derived from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics to the reporting unit. Any excess of the carrying value of the goodwill over the BEV will be recorded as an impairment loss. The calculation of the BEV is based on significant unobservable inputs, such as price trends, customer demand, material costs and discount rates, and are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

There can be no assurance that anticipated financial results will be achieved and the goodwill balances remain susceptible to future impairment charges. The goodwill related to the GSM and FSI reporting units are determined to have the greatest risk of future impairment charges given the difference (approximately 26% and 24%, respectively) between the BEV and carrying value of these reporting units as of the Company's annual impairment test date. The BEVs of the Company's other reporting units more substantially exceed their carrying values. If the Company's projected future cash flows were lower, or if the assumed weighted-average cost of capital were higher, the testing performed at year-end may have indicated an impairment of the goodwill related to one or more of the Company's reporting units. Any impairment charges that the Company may take in the future could be material to its Consolidated statements of operations and financial condition.
No goodwill impairment charges were incurred in the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 or 2019 as a result of our annual impairment testing.

The Company's other intangible assets are as follows:
December 31,
20212020
(in thousands)Useful Life
(in years)
Original CostAccumulated AmortizationNet Book ValueOriginal CostAccumulated AmortizationNet Book Value
Intangible asset class
  Customer lists3to10$136,311 $58,047 $78,264 $131,032 $45,546 $85,486 
  Non-compete agreements1to721,796 21,124 672 21,096 15,461 5,635 
  Supply agreement10to108,721 7,450 1,271 9,060 6,988 2,072 
  Technology10to1013,400 8,878 4,522 13,400 7,538 5,862 
  Trademarks and patents7to1015,810 12,020 3,790 15,810 10,764 5,046 
  Software2to1089,956 61,920 28,036 88,844 53,461 35,383 
  Other3to51,011 429 582 1,009 409 600 
$287,005 $169,868 $117,137 $280,251 $140,167 $140,084 
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $30.3 million, $30.7 million and $33.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Expected future annual amortization expense for the assets above is as follows: 2022 -- $23.4 million; 2023 -- $22.8 million; 2024 -- $19.7 million; 2025 -- $13.5 million; and 2026 -- $11.5 million.

In 2019, the Company recorded impairment charges of $2.5 million for intangibles in the Trade segment related to a frac sand non-compete agreement. The Company also recorded a $2.2 million impairment charge for brand related intangibles within the Plant Nutrient segment.