XML 67 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.1
Goodwill
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2020
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill Goodwill

During the quarter the Company completed a reorganization of its organization and internal structure whereby the Company reorganized its operations between the Trade and Ethanol segments to enhance operating decisions and assessing performance. On January 1, 2020, the Company moved its Distillers Dried Grains ("DDG") business from the Trade to Ethanol segment. The reorganization resulted in the reassignment of goodwill to the affected reporting units using a relative fair value approach. As a result of the reassignment and allocation, the Company performed an interim review of the carrying value of goodwill at the Trade and Ethanol segments for possible impairment on both a pre and post-reorganization basis. No impairment of goodwill was indicated at the pre-reorganization reporting units.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the three months ended March 31, 2020 are as follows:
(in thousands)
Trade
 
Ethanol
 
Plant Nutrient
 
Rail
 
Total
Balance as of January 1, 2020
$
127,781

 
$
2,726

 
$
686

 
$
4,167

 
$
135,360

Reorganization (a)
(5,714
)
 
5,714

 

 

 

Balance as of March 31, 2020
$
122,067

 
$
8,440

 
$
686

 
$
4,167

 
$
135,360


(a) Reorganization related to move of the DDG business line from the Trade to Ethanol segment.

Due to the severe decline in ethanol prices, largely impacted by COVID-19 during the period, management determined that a triggering event occurred within the Ethanol segment. Accordingly, an interim impairment test was performed over the Ethanol group's goodwill as well as its other intangible and long-lived assets. Based on the results of the impairment test, the Ethanol segment did not record an impairment charge.

When performing our test for impairment, we measured each reporting unit's fair value using a combination of income and market approaches.

The income approach calculates the fair value of the reporting unit based on a discounted cash flow analysis, incorporating the weighted average cost of capital of a hypothetical third-party buyer. Significant estimates in the income approach include the following: discount rate, expected financial outlook and profitability of the reporting unit's business (all Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy). Discount rates use the weighted average cost of capital for companies within our peer group, adjusted for specific company risk premium factors.

The market approach uses the "Guideline Company" method, which calculates the fair value of the reporting unit based on a comparison of the reporting unit to comparable publicly traded companies. Significant estimates in the market approach model include identifying similar companies with comparable business factors such as size, growth, profitability, risk and return on investment, assessing comparable multiples, as well as consideration of control premiums. The blended approach assigns an equal weighting to each approach. The blended fair value of both approaches is then compared to the carrying value, and to the extent that fair value exceeds the carrying value, no impairment exists. However, to the extent the carrying value exceeds the fair value, an impairment is recorded.

The results of the goodwill impairment test within the Ethanol group supported the calculated fair value exceeding the carrying values by greater than 20%. However, as the fair value is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions, including interest rates and outlook for future volume and margins, general trends in the business and/or macro-economic factors could cause the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to fall below its carrying value.