XML 30 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
(in thousands)
 
Grain
 
Plant Nutrient
 
Rail
 
Total
Balance as of January 1, 2014
 
$
38,165

 
$
16,222

 
$
4,167

 
$
58,554

Acquisitions
 
8,257

 
5,554

 

 
13,811

Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
46,422

 
21,776

 
4,167

 
72,365

Acquisitions
 

 
47,735

 

 
47,735

Impairments
 
(46,422
)
 
(9,744
)
 

 
(56,166
)
Balance as of December 31, 2015
 

 
59,767

 
4,167

 
63,934

Acquisitions
 

 

 

 

Balances of December 31, 2016
 
$

 
$
59,767

 
$
4,167

 
$
63,934



During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company prospectively changed its annual goodwill impairment testing date from the last day of its fiscal year to the first day of October. The voluntary change was to better align its goodwill impairment testing procedures with its annual planning and budgeting process and to provide the Company with adequate time to evaluate goodwill for impairment. This change in accounting principle does not delay, accelerate, or avoid an impairment loss, nor does the change have a cumulative effect on pre-tax income, net income or loss, retained earnings, or net assets. This change was applied prospectively beginning on October 1, 2015. Retrospective application to prior periods did not occur, as it is impracticable to objectively determine the assumptions that would have been used in those earlier periods to estimate fair value.

In 2016 and 2015, the Company performed quantitative assessments of goodwill. In 2014, the Company performed a combination of quantitative and qualitative assessments of goodwill.

The quantitative approach uses a two-step process. Step 1 compares the business enterprise value ("BEV") of each reporting unit with its carrying value. The BEV was computed based on both an income approach (discounted cash flows) and a market approach. The income approach uses a reporting unit's estimated future cash flows, discounted at the weighted average cost of capital of a hypothetical third-party buyer. The market approach estimates fair value by applying cash flow multiples to the reporting unit's operating performance. The multiples are derived from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics to the reporting unit. If the BEV is less than the carrying value for any reporting unit, then Step 2 must be performed. Step 2 compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. Any excess of the carrying value of the goodwill over the implied fair value will be recorded as an impairment loss. The calculations of the BEV in Step 1 and the implied fair value of goodwill in Step 2 are based on significant unobservable inputs, such as price trends, customer demand, material costs, discount rates and asset replacement costs, and are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

In performing the qualitative assessment of goodwill, management considered the following relevant events and circumstances to determine if any reporting units were deemed to be at risk:

Macroeconomic conditions including, but not limited to deterioration in general economic conditions, limitation on accessing capital, or other developments in equity and credit markets;
Industry and market considerations such as a deterioration in the environment in which an entity operates, an increased competitive environment, a change in the market for an entity's products or services, or a regulatory or political development;
Adverse fluctuations in commodity prices
Cost factors such as increases in raw materials, labor, or other costs that have a negative effect on earnings and cash flows;
Overall financial performance such as negative or declining cash flows or a decline in actual or planned revenue or earnings compared with actual and projected results of relevant prior periods;
Other relevant entity-specific events such as changes in management, key personnel, strategy, or customers and;
Events affecting a reporting unit such as a change in the composition or carrying amount of its net assets, a more-likely-than-not expectation of selling or disposing all, or a portion, of a reporting unit, the testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit, or recognition of a goodwill impairment loss in the financial statements of a subsidiary that is a component of a reporting unit.

There is a certain degree of uncertainty associated with the key assumptions used. Potential events or changes in circumstances that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect the key assumptions include significant volatility in commodity prices or raw material prices and unanticipated changes in the economy or industries within which the businesses operate.

No goodwill impairment charges were incurred in 2016 as a result of our annual impairment testing.

Within our Plant Nutrient segment, the estimated fair value of our Wholesale reporting unit with $59.1 million of goodwill, exceeded its carrying value by approximately 8 percent. The discounted cash flow model used in the goodwill impairment test assumed discrete period revenue growth through 2020 that was reflective of market opportunities, changes in product mix from recent acquisitions, and cyclical trends within our wholesale nutrient business. In the terminal year, we assumed a long-term earnings growth rate of 2.5 percent that we believe is appropriate given the current industry-specific expectations. As of the valuation date, we utilized a weighted-average cost of capital of 8.8 percent, which we believe is appropriate as it reflects the relative risk, the time value of money, and is consistent with the peer group of the Wholesale reporting unit. The goodwill fair value is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions, including interest rates and outlook for future volume and margins.

While performing the annual assessment of goodwill impairment in 2015, the Company recorded impairment losses related to our Grain and Farm Center reporting units of $54.2 million due to compressed margins over the past several years and anticipated unfavorable operating conditions in domestic and global commodity markets, including oil and ethanol, as well as foreign exchange impacts. This is in addition to the $2.0 million of impairment related to our Cob business which was recognized in the third quarter of that year.

















The Company's other intangible assets are as follows:
(in thousands)
Original Cost
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Net Book Value
December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
Intangible asset class
 
 
 
 
 
  Customer list
$
41,477

 
$
14,958

 
$
26,519

  Non-compete agreement
4,594

 
3,064

 
1,530

  Supply agreement
9,806

 
4,827

 
4,979

  Technology
15,500

 
4,243

 
11,257

  Trademarks and patents
18,717

 
4,335

 
14,382

  Lease intangible
5,514

 
4,969

 
545

  Software
71,362

 
24,592

 
46,770

  Other
1,953

 
1,835

 
118

 
$
168,923

 
$
62,823

 
$
106,100

December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
Intangible asset class
 
 
 
 
 
  Customer list
$
42,561

 
$
12,130

 
$
30,431

  Non-compete agreement
4,594

 
2,517

 
2,077

  Supply agreement
9,806

 
3,955

 
5,851

  Technology
15,500

 
2,483

 
13,017

  Trademarks and patents
18,717

 
2,273

 
16,444

  Lease intangible
5,479

 
4,586

 
893

  Software
70,846

 
19,508

 
51,338

  Other
1,953

 
1,764

 
189

 
$
169,456

 
$
49,216

 
$
120,240


 
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $16.8 million, $14.5 million and $8.8 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Expected future annual amortization expense is as follows: 2017 -- $16.1 million; 2018 -- $15.6 million; 2019 -- $14.8 million; 2020 -- $13.6 million; and 2021 -- $12.9 million. In December 2016, the Company recorded a $0.5 million impairment related to software in the Retail Group. In December 2014, the Company recorded an impairment of $1.5 million related to a customer list in the Grain Group.