Fair Value of Financial Instruments

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2017

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Note 12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The FASB defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous markets for the asset and liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company estimates fair value of its financial instruments utilizing an established three-level hierarchy in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date as follows:

• Level 1 – Valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

• Level 2 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.

• Level 3 – Valuation is based upon other unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value measurements.

The classification of fair value measurements within the hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement.

At June 30, 2017, the Company had foreign currency forward contracts recorded at fair value. The fair values of these instruments were measured using valuations based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets (Level 2) and are valued by reference to similar financial instruments, adjusted for credit risk and restrictions and other terms specific to the contracts.

In February 2016, the Company entered into a contingent earnout arrangement which provides up to a maximum of $6.0 million of additional cash earnout opportunities based upon EpiWorks achieving certain agreed upon financial and operational targets for capacity, wafer output and gross margin, which if earned would be payable for the achievement of each specific annual target over the next three years. The Company paid the first year earnout amount of $2.0 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2017.

In June 2017, the Company entered into a contingent earnout arrangement which provides up to a maximum of $2.5 million of additional cash earnout opportunities based upon IPI achieving certain agreed upon financial and transitional objectives relating to finance, information technology and human resources, which if earned would be payable for the achievement of each specific annual target over the next year.

The fair values of these contingent earnout arrangements were measured using valuations based upon other unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement (Level 3).

The following tables provide a summary by level of the fair value of financial instruments that are measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2017 and 2016 ($000):

	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2017 Using:
			Quoted Prices in		Significant
			Active Markets		Other		Significant
			for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	June 30, 2017		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	191	$	-	$	191	$	-
Liabilities:
Contingent earnout arrangements	$	5,795	$	-	$	-	$	5,795

	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2016 Using:
			Quoted Prices in		Significant
			Active Markets		Other		Significant
			for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	June 30, 2016		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Liabilities:
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	511	$	-	$	511	$	-
Contingent earnout arrangement	$	4,352	$	-	$	-	$	4,352

The Company’s policy is to report transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy at fair values as of the beginning of the period in which the transfers occur. There were no transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during fiscal years 2017 and 2016.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value measurements of the Company’s level 3 contingent earnout arrangement related to the acquisitions of II-VI EpiWorks and IPI ($000):

	Significant
	Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 3)
Balance at July 1, 2016	$	4,352
Contingent earnout arrangements:
Contingent earnout - IPI		2,250
Payments		(2,000	)
Changes in fair value recorded in other expense, (income)		1,193
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	5,795

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents are considered Level 1 among the fair value hierarchy and approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The Company’s borrowings include variable interest rate, non-interest bearing debt and a capital lease obligation and are considered Level 2 among the fair value hierarchy and accordingly their carrying amounts approximate fair value.