nvcsr

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To U.S. Bank National Association, Owner Trustee, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., Bond Trustee, and the Certificateholders of College and University Facility Loan Trust One:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of College and University Facility Loan Trust One (the “Trust”), including the schedule of investments as of November 30, 2010 and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2010, by correspondence with the custodian; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As described in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Trust is accounting for its investments under the amortized cost method of accounting, with its loan investments adjusted by an allowance for loan loss. In our opinion, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the investments be accounted for under the fair value method of accounting and that the financial statements include the disclosures required under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. Accounting for the investments under the fair value method of accounting, based on management’s estimate of fair value as described in Note 8, would result in an increase of approximately $5,739,000 in the recorded value of the investments as of November 30, 2010, and would result in a change in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $(4,000) and $1,237,000 for the years ended November 30, 2010 and November 30, 2009, respectively and would also impact the financial highlights presented.

In our opinion, except for the effect on the 2010 and 2009 financial statements and the financial highlights of accounting for investments under the amortized cost method of accounting, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of College and University Facility Loan Trust One as of November 30, 2010, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
January 31, 2011

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Statement of Assets and Liabilities


November 30,	2010


Assets:

Investments, at amortized cost, net of allowance for loan losses of $454,000 (Notes 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8)	$	20,496,162
Cash		50,000
Interest receivable		468,556
Deferred bond issuance costs (Note 2)		47,665


Total assets		21,062,383


Liabilities:

Bonds payable (Notes 3 and 8)		9,689,463
Bond interest payable (Note 3)		511,119
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		149,925
Distributions payable to Class B certificateholders (Note 5)		648,234


Total liabilities		10,998,741


Net Assets:

Class B certificates, par value $1 — authorized, issued and outstanding — 1,001,643 certificates (Note 5)		1,001,643
Distributions in excess of tax earnings (Note 2)		(454,000	)
Additional paid-in capital		9,515,999

Net assets	$	10,063,642


Net asset value per Class B certificate (based on 1,001,643 certificates outstanding)	$	10.05

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Statement of Cash Flows


Year ended November 30,	2010


Cash flows from operating activities:
Reconciliation of net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	827,303
Decrease in loan principal balance		2,798,453
Amortization of purchase discount on Loans		(1,139,833	)
Decrease in provision for loan losses		(126,000	)
Decrease in investment agreements		1,159,424
Increase in interest receivable		(33,739	)
Amortization of deferred bond issuance costs		26,433
Decrease in Bond interest payable		(142,348	)
Decrease in payable to Trustees		(246	)
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities		32,976


Net cash provided by operating activities	$	3,402,423


Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal repayments on Bonds		(2,698,537	)
Distributions to Class B certificateholders		(703,886	)


Net cash used in financing activities		(3,402,423	)


Net decrease in cash		—

Cash, beginning of year		50,000


Cash, end of year	$	50,000


Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for interest on bonds	$	1,238,584

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Financial Highlights


Years ended November 30,	2010			2009			2008			2007			2006


Net asset value, beginning of year	$	10.01		$	10.34		$	10.45		$	10.52		$	10.86


Net investment income		.70			.70			.50			.84			.66

(Increase) decrease in allowance for loan losses		.13			(.12	)		—			.10			.10

Distributions to Class B certificateholders from tax return of capital		(.79	)		(.91	)		(.61	)		(1.01	)		(1.10	)


Net asset value, end of year	$	10.05		$	10.01		$	10.34		$	10.45		$	10.52


Total investment return (a)		N/A			N/A			N/A			N/A			N/A

Net assets applicable to Class B certificates, end of year	$	10,063,642		$	10,025,807		$	10,354,920		$	10,470,620		$	10,540,720


Ratios and Supplemental Data:
Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets applicable to Class B certificates		14.82%	^(b)		17.35	%^(b)		21.08	%^(b)		23.47	%^(b)		26.24	%^(b)
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to Class B certificates		6.98	%		6.89	%		4.79	%		8.00	%		6.20	%
Number of Class B certificates outstanding, end of year		1,001,643			1,001,643			1,001,643			1,001,643			1,001,643


(a)		The Trust’s investments are recorded at amortized cost as discussed in Note 2. Accordingly, the financial statements do not reflect the market value of such investments. For this reason, management believes that no meaningful information can be provided regarding “Total investment return” and has not included information under that heading. In addition, as the Trust did not purchase or sell investments during the periods presented, “portfolio turnover” would have been 0% for all periods presented.

(b)		Excluding interest expense, the ratio of operating expenses to average net assets applicable to Class B certificates was 3.65%, 3.42%, 4.60%, 4.28% and 4.24% in 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

1.		Organization and Business

		College and University Facility Loan Trust One (the Trust) was formed on September 17, 1987 as a business trust under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts by a declaration of trust by Bank of Boston (the Owner Trustee), succeeded by State Street Bank and Trust Company, succeeded by US Bank (successor Owner Trustee), not in its individual capacity but solely as Owner Trustee. The Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (as amended) as a diversified, closed-end, management investment company.

		The Trust was formed for the sole purpose of raising funds through the issuance and sale of bonds (the Bonds). The Trust commenced operations on September 29, 1987 (the Closing Date) and issued Bonds in five tranches in the aggregate principal amount (at maturity) of $126,995,000. The Bonds constitute full recourse obligations of the Trust. The collateral securing the Bonds consists primarily of a pool of loans made to college and university facilities (the “Loans”) and certain other funds held under the indenture (the Indenture) and the investment agreements. The Loans were originated by, or previously assigned to, the United States Department of Education (ED) under the College Housing Loan Program or the Academic Facilities Loan Program. The Loans, which have been assigned to The Bank of New York Mellon, National Association, as successor in interest to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as successor in interest to Bank One Trust Company, NA, formerly The First National Bank of Chicago (the Bond Trustee), are secured by various types of collateral, including mortgages on real estate, general recourse obligations of the borrowers, pledges of securities and pledges of revenues. As of the Closing Date, the Loans had a weighted average stated interest rate of approximately 3.16% and a weighted average remaining term to maturity of approximately 19.4 years. Payments on the Loans are managed by the Bond Trustee in various fund accounts and are invested under investment agreements (see Note 2) as specified in the Indenture.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

1.		Organization and Business (Continued)

		All payments on the Loans and earnings under the investment agreements and any required transfers from the Expense, Reserve and Liquidity Funds are deposited to the credit of the Revenue Fund held by the Bond Trustee, as defined within, and in accordance with the Indenture. On each bond payment date, amounts on deposit in the Revenue Fund are applied in the following order of priority: to pay amounts due on the Bonds, to pay administrative expenses not previously paid from the Expense Fund, to fund the Expense Fund to the Expense Fund Requirement, to fund the Reserve Fund to the Maximum Reserve Requirement and to fund the Liquidity Fund to the Liquidity Fund Requirement. Any funds remaining in the Revenue Fund on such payment date are paid to the Class B certificateholders, as discussed in Note 5.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a)

College and University Facility Loans

		The Loans were purchased by the Trust at amounts below the par value of the Loans.

		Pursuant to a “no-action letter” that the Trust received from the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Loans were recorded at the discounted value below par and are being accounted for under the amortized cost method of accounting, net of any allowance for loan losses. Under this method, the difference between the cost of each Loan to the Trust and the scheduled principal and interest payments is amortized, assuming no prepayments of principal, and included in the Trust’s income by applying the Loan’s effective interest rate to the amortized cost of that Loan. Upon a Loan prepayment, the remaining discount is recognized as interest income. The remaining balance of the purchase discount on the Loans as of November 30, 2010 was approximately $4,241,000. For the year ended November 30, 2010the trust recognized approximately $1,463,000 of interest income related to the amortization of the purchase discount. As a result of prepayments of Loans during the year ended November 30, 2010, additional interest income of approximately $194,000 was recognized in the statement of operations.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(a)

College and University Facility Loans (Continued)

		Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), requires that the Loans be accounted for at fair value. However, management believes that the amortized cost method of accounting, net of any allowance for loan losses, best serves the informational needs of the users of the Trust’s financial statements.

		The Trust records an allowance for loan losses based on the Trust’s evaluation of collectability of the Loans within the portfolio. The Loans are classified into three separate pools based on risk and collection performance. The pools are then assigned a reserve percentage based on risk and other factors and a reserve is systematically calculated for the pools:

	(1)		General — Loans are performing on a timely basis and where there is no information that leads the Trust to reclassify to a different risk pool.

	(2)		Substandard — Loans are generally classified into this category resulting from either historical collection issues or administrative issues with receiving collection that have been on-going. Loans in this pool are not considered uncollectible but due to collection issues, a higher reserve percentage is applied due to the risk profile of this pool.

	(3)		Doubtful — A Loan is considered doubtful when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Trust will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the Loan agreement. Loans in this category are generally assigned a 100% reserve unless facts and circumstances provide evidence that some level of collectability exists. At November 30, 2010, there were no recorded investments in Loans that are considered to be doubtful.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(a)

College and University Facility Loans (Continued)

		As credit quality for an individual Loan changes, the Loan would be evaluated for reclassification to a different risk pool as described above. Risk ratings to the existing pools may be adjusted based on qualitative factors including, among others, general economic and business conditions, credit quality trends, and specific industry conditions.

		There are inherent uncertainties with respect to the final outcome of Loans and as such, actual losses may differ from the amounts reflected in the financial statements and could be material.

(b)

Interest Income

		The Trust records interest on the Loans as earned. The Loans generally require interest payments on a semiannual basis with rates of interest ranging from 3% to 3.63%. The Trust recognizes purchase discount as interest income on the effective interest method.

		The Trust’s policy is to generally discontinue the accrual of interest on Loans for which payment of principal or interest is 180 days or more past due or for other such Loans if management believes the collection of interest and principal is doubtful. Due to the nature of the loan investments in the Trust, there are instances where payment of the loans and related interest may not be received by the Trust due to documentation issues that require time for the Trust to resolve. In those circumstances, where the past due loan is greater than 180 days but the Trust has concluded it is not a credit issue, the accrual of interest or the accretion of interest discount may continue to be recorded as the Trust believes these amounts to be collectable. When a Loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all previously accrued, but uncollected interest is reversed against the current period’s interest income. Subsequently, interest income is generally recognized when received. Payments are generally applied to interest first, with the balance, if any, applied to principal. At November 30, 2010, no Loans have been placed on nonaccrual status.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(c)

Other Investments

		Other investments, which are included in investments in the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, consist of two unsecured investment agreements issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association bearing fixed rates of interest of 5% and 8%. These investments are carried at amortized cost. These investment agreements terminate on the earlier of December 1, 2014 or the date on which the Bonds are paid-in-full. Please see Note 8 for discussion of fair value measurement of these investments.

		ASC 820 requires that the investments be accounted for under the fair value method of accounting. However, management believes that the amortized cost method of accounting best serves the informational needs of the users of the Trust’s financial statements.

(d)

Federal Income Taxes

		It is the Trust’s policy to comply with the requirements applicable to a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and to distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income to its certificateholders each year. Accordingly, no federal or state income tax provision is required.

		For tax purposes, the Loans were transferred to the Trust at their face values. Accordingly, the accretion of the purchase discount creates a permanent book-tax difference.

		As of November 30, 2010, the Trust had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure.

		The Trust’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(e)

Deferred Bond Issuance Costs

Deferred bond issuance costs are being amortized using the effective interest-rate method, assuming that all mandatory semiannual payments will be made on the Bonds as discussed in Note 3.

(f)

Presentation of Capital Distributions

		Capital distributions are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 946 Investment Company, (“ASC 946”). ASC 946 requires the Trust to report distributions that are in excess of tax-basis earnings and profits as a tax return of capital and to present the capital accounts on a basis that approximates the amounts that are available for future distributions on a tax basis.

		In accordance with ASC 946-505, the Trust reclassifies certain amounts from distributions in excess of tax earnings to paid-in-capital. The total reclassification is $88,165 as of November 30, 2010. This reclassification has no impact on the net investment income or net assets of the Trust.

		The reclassifications are a result of permanent differences between GAAP and tax accounting for such items as net operating losses and the accretion of purchase discounts on the Loans. Additionally, the amount deducted for the allowance for loan losses is not currently deductible for tax purposes and creates a temporary deficit reflected as distributions in excess of tax earnings in the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities.

		Distributions of $0.14 and $0.65 per certificate were declared on May 20, 2010 and November 20, 2010 and paid to certificateholders of record on June 2, 2010 and December 2, 2010, respectively.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(f)

Presentation of Capital Distributions (Continued)

		The tax character of distributions paid was a return of capital of $789,468.

		As of November 30, 2010, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were related to distributions in excess of tax earnings of $454,000.

		The distributions in excess of tax earnings consist of allowance for loan losses of $454,000 which will reverse in future years causing a reduction in taxable ordinary income.

(g)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Trust to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended. On an on-going basis, the Trust evaluates the estimates used, including those related to the allowance for loan losses. The Trust bases its estimates on historical experience, current conditions and various other assumptions that the Trust believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and are not readily apparent from other sources. These estimates are used to assist the Trust in the identification and assessment of the accounting treatment necessary with respect to commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions and differences could be material.

(h)

Statement of Cash Flows

The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Trust is the amount included in the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and represents the cash on hand and does not include any short-term investments.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(i)

Risk Factors

		The Trust’s investments are subject to the following:

		Market Risk

		Market risk represents the potential loss that can be caused by a change in the fair value of the financial instrument.

		Credit Risk

		The Trust is subject to credit risk if the counterparties failed to perform pursuant to the terms of their agreements with the Trust.

		The Trust’s investments are held in escrow by The Bank of New York Mellon, National Association, (the “Trustee”). The Trustee has custody of the Trust’s investments. The Trust is subject to counterparty risk to the extent that the Trustee may be unable to fulfill its obligations to the Trust.

		Loan payments made to the Trust are received and processed by a third party servicer. The Trust is subject to counterparty risk to the extent that the servicer may be unable to fulfill its obligations to the Trust.

		Prepayment Risk

		Most of the Loans held by the Trust allow for prepayment of principal without penalty. As such, the Trust is subject to prepayment risk, which could negatively impact future earnings.

(j)

Indemnification

Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Trust, and certificateholders’ are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Trust may enter into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Trust’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet occurred.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

(k)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

		In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-20 which amends Receivables (Topic 310) (“ASU No. 2010-20”). ASU No. 2010-20 is intended to provide additional information to assist financial statement users in assessing an entity’s risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. The disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Trust does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2010-20 to have a significant impact on its financial statements.

3.		Bonds

		The Bonds outstanding at November 30, 2010 consist of the following:

Principal

Interest

Stated

Amount

Type

Rate

Maturity

(000’s)

Term

10.55%

December 1, 2014

$9,689

		The Bonds are being redeemed, in part, on a pro rata basis by application of mandatory semiannual payments. The redemption price is equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the redemption date. Interest on the Bonds is payable semiannually.

		On December 1, 2010, the Trust made the mandatory redemption of $1,280,430 on the Bonds. The average amount of bond principal outstanding for the period ended November 30, 2010 was approximately $11,057,000.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

3.		Bonds (Continued)

		The aggregate scheduled maturities of the Bonds, including the scheduled mandatory redemptions at November 30, 2010, are as follows:


	Amount
Fiscal Year	(000’s)

2011	$	2,662
2012		2,359
2013		2,121
2014		1,767
2015		780


Total	$	9,689

		The Bonds are not subject to optional redemption by either the Trust or the bondholders.

		In the event the Trust realizes negative cash flows, reserves have been established and maintained such that, on or before such bond payment date, such funds may be used by the Bond Trustee to make any required payments on the Bonds and to pay operating expenses of the Trust. See Note 8 for balances in the respective funds.

		The cash flows from the December 1, 2010 bond payment date were sufficient to satisfy the maximum reserve fund requirement of $4,049,562, as required by the Indenture.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

Administrative Agreements

(a)

Servicer

As compensation for the services provided under the servicing agreement, Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC (“Servicer”), formerly Capmark Finance, Inc. receives a servicing fee. This fee is earned on each date of payment for each Loan and is equal to 0.055 of 1% of the outstanding principal balance of such Loan divided by the number of payments of principal and interest in a calendar year. For the year ended November 30 2010, this fee totaled $8,564. Additionally, per the servicing agreement, the Servicer shall be reimbursed for certain expenditures incurred related to inspection of mortgaged property. For the year ended November 30 2010, the Servicer was reimbursed approximately $1,545.

(b)

Trustees

As compensation for services provided, the Owner and Bond Trustees are entitled under the Declaration of Trust and the Indenture to receive the following fees:

	•		The Owner Trustee, in its capacities as manager of the Trust and as Owner Trustee earned fees of $18,715 and $16,843, respectively, in accordance with the Declaration of Trust agreement, for the year ended November 30, 2010. In addition, the Owner Trustee incurred $1,893 of out-of-pocket expenses.

	•		The Bond Trustee is entitled to an annual fee equal to 0.025 of 1% of the aggregate outstanding principal of the Bonds on the bond payment date immediately preceding the date of payment of such fee. The Bond Trustee is also reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, the Bond Trustee is reimbursed for other agreed-upon related expenses such as transaction costs. For the year ended November 30, 2010, total Bond Trustee fees and related expenses amounted to $4,758.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

5.		Certificates

		The holders of the Class B certificates may receive semi-annual distributions declared in May and November of each year, calculated in accordance with the Trust Indenture, from amounts collected by the Trust, on a pro rata basis. While the Bonds remain outstanding, the distributions are paid on the second business day in each June and December and, after the Bonds are paid in full, on the first business day of each month. The certificate holders of the Class B Certificates are entitled to one vote per certificate. At November 30, 2010, the distributions declared on November 20, 2010, of $648,000, which was paid on December 2, 2010, was recorded as distributions payable.

6.		Allowance for Loan Losses

		An analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the year ended November 30, 2010 is summarized as follows:


Balance, beginning of year	$	580,000
Decrease in provision for loan losses		(126,000	)
Charge-offs		—


Balance, end of year	$	454,000

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

7.		Loans

		Scheduled principal and interest payments on the Loans as of November 30, 2010 are as follows:


	Principal		Interest
	Payments		Payments		Total
Fiscal year	(000’s)		(000’s)		(000’s)

2011	$	2,673	$	573	$	3,246
2012		2,239		377		2,616
2013		1,905		312		2,217
2014		2,940		247		3,187
2015		1,458		160		1,618
Thereafter		4,276		313		4,589


Total	$	15,491	$	1,982	$	17,473

		Expected payments may differ from contractual payments because borrowers may prepay or default on their obligations. Accordingly, actual principal and interest payments on the Loans may vary significantly from the scheduled payments.

		The following analysis summarizes the stratification of the Loan portfolio by type of collateral and institution as of November 30, 2010.


			Amortized		% of
	Number		Cost		Amortized
Type of Collateral	of Loans		(000’s)		Cost

Loans secured by a first mortgage		25	$	7,668		68.2	%
Loans not secured by a first mortgage		14		3,582		31.8	%


Total Loans		39	$	11,250		100.0	%

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

Loans (Continued)


			Amortized		% of
	Number		Cost		Amortized
Type of Institution	of Loans		(000’s)		Cost

Public		13	$	4,409		39.2	%
Private		26		6,841		60.8	%


Total Loans		39	$	11,250		100.0	%

		The ability of a borrower to meet future debt service payments on a Loan will depend on a number of factors relevant to the financial condition of such borrower, including, among others, the size and diversity of the borrower’s sources of revenues; enrollment trends; reputation; management expertise; the availability and restrictions on the use of endowments and other funds; the quality and maintenance costs of the borrower’s facilities and, in the case of some Loans to public institutions which are obligations of a state, the financial condition of the relevant state or other governmental entity and its policies with respect to education. The ability of a borrower to maintain enrollment levels will depend on such factors as tuition costs, geographical location, geographic diversity, quality of the student body, quality of the faculty and diversity of program offerings.

		The collateral for Loans that are secured by a mortgage on real estate generally consists of special purpose facilities, such as dormitories, dining halls and gymnasiums, which are integral components of the overall educational setting. As a result, in the event of borrower default on a Loan, the Trust’s ability to realize the outstanding balance of the Loan through the sale of the underlying collateral may be negatively impacted by the special purpose nature and location of such collateral.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

8.		Fair Value of Financial Instruments

		ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825”) requires that entities disclose the estimated fair value for financial instruments, where they are accounted for on a basis other than Fair Value. ASC 825 allows for the use of a wide range of valuation techniques; therefore, it may be difficult to compare the Trust’s fair value information to independent markets or to other fair value information.

		Current market prices are not available for most of the Trust’s financial instruments since an active market generally does not exist for such instruments. In accordance with the terms of the Indenture, the Trust is required to hold all of the Loans to maturity and to use the cash flows therefrom to retire the Bonds. Accordingly, the Trust has estimated the fair values of its Loans and Bonds, using a discounted cash flow methodology. This methodology is similar to the approach used at the formation of the Trust to determine the carrying amounts of these instruments for financial reporting purposes. In applying the methodology, the calculations have been adjusted for the change in the relevant market rates of interest, the estimated duration of the instruments and an internally developed credit risk rating of the instruments. All calculations are based on the scheduled principal and interest payments on the Loans (excluding any potential prepayments as it is not possible to estimate such prepayments), and scheduled payments on the Bonds.

		The fair values of the long-term fixed-maturity investments are determined by adding a market rate adjustment to the carrying value of the investments. This market rate adjustment is calculated using the net present value of the difference between future interest income to the Trust at the issue rate and the future interest income at the current market rate through the maturity of the investment. The current market rate is based upon Fannie Mae bond rates at November 30, 2010, with similar maturity dates to the investment agreements.

College and University
Facility Loan Trust One

Notes to Financial Statements
Year Ended November 30, 2010

8.		Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

		The estimated fair value of the Trust’s financial instruments and the related book value presented in the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities as of November 30, 2010 is as follows:


	Amortized
	Cost			Fair Value
	(000’s)			(000’s)


Loans	$	10,796	*	$	15,202
Investment Agreements:
Revenue Fund		7,100			7,513
Liquidity Fund		2,600			3,520


	$	20,496		$	26,235


Bonds payable	$	9,689		$	11,722


*		Net of allowance for loan losses of $454,000.

9.		Subsequent Events

		The Trust has evaluated the need for disclosures and/or adjustments resulting from subsequent events through the date of issuance of these financial statements. Except for the subsequent distributions disclosed in Notes 3 and 5, the evaluation did not result in any subsequent events that necessitated disclosures and/or adjustments to these financial statements.

COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY FACILITY LOAN TRUST ONE

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

November 30, 2010

(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)


								Internal
Outstanding			Stated					Rate of			Amortized
Principal			Interest			Maturity		Return % (A)			Cost $ (Notes
Balance		Description	Rate %			Date		(Unaudited)			1 and 2)
		COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY LOANS (107%)
		—— ALABAMA —
$	1,036	University of Alabama		3.00	%		05/01/2021		12.27	%	$	680
	154	University of Montevallo		3.00			05/01/2023		12.30			94
		—— CALIFORNIA —
	353	Azusa Pacific University		3.00			04/01/2017		12.96			257
	140	Monterey Peninsula College		3.00			10/01/2018		11.95			97
	230	San Diego State University		3.00			11/01/2021		11.93			148
	470	San Francisco State University		3.00			11/01/2021		11.93			299
		—— INDIANA —
	60	Taylor University		3.00			10/01/2010		12.45			60	(D)
	840	University of Notre Dame		3.00			04/01/2018		12.95			590
		—— MARYLAND —
	530	Western Maryland College		3.00			11/01/2016		12.44			392
		—— MASSACHUSETTS —
	128	Atlantic Union College		3.00			11/01/2023		12.68			75
	541	Boston University		3.00			12/31/2022		11.87			333
		—— MICHIGAN —
	560	Albion College		3.00			10/01/2015		12.51			451
	1,843	Finlandia University		3.50			08/01/2014		12.70			1,165
		—— MINNESOTA —
	560	Augsburg College		3.00			04/01/2016		12.95			427
	260	College of St. Thomas		3.00			04/01/2017		12.95			190
		—— MISSISSIPPI —
	20	Mississippi Valley State		3.00			07/01/2008		11.89			20	(D)
		—— NEBRASKA —
	33	University of Nebraska		3.00			07/01/2013		10.59			29
		—— NEW HAMPSHIRE —
	86	New England College		3.63			10/01/2013		12.37			74
	515	New England College		3.00			04/01/2019		12.96			348
		—— NEW JERSEY —
	62	Fairleigh Dickinson University		3.00			11/01/2020		12.09			41
		—— NEW YORK —
	245	Long Island University		3.00			06/01/2016		12.34			180
	632	Sarah Lawrence College		3.00			11/01/2021		12.64			403
		—— NORTH CAROLINA —
	53	Montreat-Anderson College		3.00			12/01/2019		12.19			35
		—— OHIO —
	785	Case Western Reserve University		3.00			04/01/2016		10.54			636
	52	University of Steubenville		3.38			04/01/2012		12.88			47
	148	University of Steubenville		3.00			04/01/2017		12.96			108
		—— PENNSYLVANIA —
	267	Carnegie — Mellon University		3.00			11/01/2017		10.45			208
	245	Harcum Junior College		3.00			11/01/2015		12.44			189
	38	Swarthmore College		3.00			05/01/2014		12.30			32
	163	Temple University		3.38			11/01/2014		11.99			142
		—— RHODE ISLAND —
	176	Community College of Rhode Island		3.00			04/01/2018		12.10			128

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this schedule.

COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY FACILITY LOAN TRUST ONE

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

November 30, 2010

(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)

(continued)


										Internal
Outstanding				Stated						Rate of			Amortized
Principal				Interest			Maturity			Return % (A)			Cost $ (Notes
Balance			Description	Rate %			Date			(Unaudited)			1 and 2)
			—— SOUTH CAROLINA —
$	375		College of Charleston		3.00	%		07/01/2016			12.02	%	$	280
	228		Morris College		3.00			11/01/2013			12.42			191
			—— TEXAS —
	49		St. Edward’s University		3.63			04/01/2013			12.80			43
	178		Texas Tech University		3.63			03/01/2013			10.80			159
	805		Texas Tech University		3.50			03/01/2012			10.83			747
			—— VERMONT —
	478		Middlebury College		3.00			04/01/2018			12.87			337
	1,648		University of Vermont		3.00			10/01/2019			12.19			1,192
			—— VIRGINIA —
	505		Old Dominion University		3.00			06/01/2013			11.70			423

	15,491	(B)	TOTAL COLLEGE & UNIVERSITY LOANS											11,250


			Allowance for Loan Losses											454


			Net Loans of the Trust											10,796


			INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS (96%)

	2,600		FNMA #787 Liquidity Fund		8.00			12/01/2014	(C)		8.00			2,600
	7,100		FNMA #786 Revenue Fund		5.00			12/01/2014	(C)		5.00			7,100

	9,700		Total Investment Agreements											9,700

$	25,191		Total Investments (203%)											20,496


			OTHER ASSETS, LESS LIABILITIES (-103%)											(10,432	)


			NET ASSETS (100%)										$	10,064


(A)		Represents the rate of return based on the contributed cost and the amortization to maturity.

(B)		The tax basis in the Loans is approximately $15,491.

(C)		Will terminate at the earlier of December 1, 2014 or the date on which the Bonds are paid-in-full (Note 2).

(D)		The amortized cost on these loans are equal to the outstanding principal as the final loan payment is delinquent (Note 2).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this schedule.

ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

(a) Audit Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:

Fiscal year ended 2010 — $110,500

Fiscal year ended 2009 — $114,000

(b) Audit-Related Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:

Fiscal year ended 2010 — $0

Fiscal year ended 2009 — $0

Fiscal year ended 2010 — $0

Fiscal year ended 2009 — $0

(d) All Other Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:

Fiscal year ended 2010 — $60,000

—$44,000 in connection with Accountants’ Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures to comply with the requirements of section 4.8 of the Trust’s Indenture.

—$12,000 in connection with Accountants’ Report on Applying Agreed Upon Procedure relating to the Trust’s Servicing Agreement.

—$4,000 out of pocket expenses.

Fiscal year ended 2009 — $62,400

—$44,000 in connection with Accountants’ Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures to comply with the requirements of section 4.8 of the Trust’s Indenture.

—$12,000 in connection with Accountants’ Report on Applying Agreed Upon Procedure relating to the Trust’s Servicing Agreement.

—$6,400 out of pocket expenses.

(e)

(1) Audit Committee Policies regarding Pre-approval of Services. Not applicable to the registrant.

(2) Percentage of services identified in items 4(b) through 4(d) that were approved by the registrants audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X:

Not applicable to the registrant.

(f) Not applicable to the registrant.

(g) Not applicable to the registrant.

(h) Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

Schedule is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1.

ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGER OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 9. PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Not applicable to the registrant.

(b) Not applicable to the registrant.


Year ended November 30,	2010


Investment income:
Interest income	$	2,190,352


Expenses:
Interest expense (Note 3)		1,122,669
Servicer fees (Note 4)		10,109
Trustee fees (Note 4)		42,209
Other trust and bond administration expenses		314,062


Total expenses		1,489,049


Net investment income		701,303

Decrease in provision for loan losses (Note 6)		126,000


Net increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	827,303


Year ended November 30,	2010			2009


From operations:
Net investment income	$	701,303		$	702,057
Decrease (Increase) in provision for loan losses		126,000			(120,000	)


Net increase in net assets applicable to Class B certificateholders resulting from operations		827,303			582,057

Distributions to Class B certificateholders from:
Tax return of capital (Note 5)		(789,468	)		(911,170	)


Net increase in net assets		37,835			(329,113	)

Net assets:
Beginning of year		10,025,807			10,354,920


End of year	$	10,063,642		$	10,025,807