XML 19 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Note 2 - Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
New Accounting Pronouncements And Changes In Accounting Principles [Abstract]  
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

(2)

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The following accounting pronouncements became effective for the Company in the first three months of 2018:

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 which introduces a new five-step revenue recognition model in which an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.    

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted the new accounting standard ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers and all the related amendments (“new revenue standard”) to all contracts not completed as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method.  The cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard was $16,219 and has been recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.  The cumulative effect adjustment relates primarily to the recognition of revenue and costs for contracts that transfer promised goods or services over time.  Gross sales, cost of goods sold, and tax expense of $51,896, $31,347, and $4,330 respectively, were recorded as part of the cumulative effect adjustment.  The comparative information has not been restated and is reported in accordance with accounting standard Topic 605, which was in effect for those periods.

The adoption of the new revenue standard impacted the consolidated financial statements as follows:

 

Income Statement

 

 

 

For the Three Months

Ended March 31, 2018

 

 

 

As

Reported

 

 

Effect of Change

Higher/(Lower)

 

 

Amount

Without

Adoption of

ASC 606

 

Gross sales

 

$

139,130

 

 

$

37,280

 

 

$

101,850

 

Net revenue

 

 

141,097

 

 

 

37,280

 

 

 

103,817

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

90,242

 

 

 

20,699

 

 

 

69,543

 

Gross profit

 

 

50,855

 

 

 

16,581

 

 

 

34,274

 

Operating profit

 

 

30,381

 

 

 

16,581

 

 

 

13,800

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

5,786

 

 

 

3,171

 

 

 

2,615

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

24,249

 

 

 

13,410

 

 

 

10,839

 

Net income

 

 

24,058

 

 

 

13,410

 

 

 

10,648

 

Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations

 

 

0.72

 

 

 

0.40

 

 

 

0.32

 

 

Balance Sheet

 

 

 

March 31, 2018

 

 

 

As

Reported

 

 

Effect of Change

Higher/(Lower)

 

 

Balances

Without

Adoption of

ASC 606

 

Current Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade receivables

 

$

55,166

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

55,166

 

Contract assets

 

 

88,990

 

 

 

88,990

 

 

 

-

 

Inventory

 

 

104,544

 

 

 

(51,886

)

 

 

156,430

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contract liabilities, current

 

 

6,721

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

6,721

 

Taxes payable

 

 

8,162

 

 

 

7,819

 

 

 

343

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retained earnings

 

 

470,103

 

 

 

29,629

 

 

 

440,474

 

 

Presentation of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Related to Defined Benefit Plans

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07 which amends the requirements in ASC 715 related to the income statement presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost for an entity’s sponsored defined pension and other postretirement plans. The ASU requires entities to disaggregate the current-service-cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and present it with other current compensation costs for related employees in the income statement and present the other components elsewhere in the income statement and outside of income from operations if such subtotal is presented. This standard became effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company recorded $311 to “Other expenses, net” which formerly would have been recorded as “Selling, general and administrative expenses” or “Cost of goods sold.”  To conform to the current year presentation, the Company reclassified $363 from “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and $50 from “Cost of goods sold” to “Other expenses, net” for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Scope of Modification Accounting, Stock Based Compensation

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09 which provides clarification on when modification accounting should be used for changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. This ASU does not change the accounting for modifications but clarifies that modification accounting guidance should only be applied if there is a change to the value, vesting conditions, or award classification and would not be required if the changes are considered non-substantive. The update became effective on January 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Business Combinations – Clarifying the Definition of a Business

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01 which clarifies the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard introduces a screen for determining when assets acquired are not a business and clarifies that a business must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that contribute to an output to be considered a business. The amendment became effective on January 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15 which provides guidance on the presentation and classification in the statement of cash flows for specific cash receipt and payment transactions, including debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims and corporate-owned life insurance policies, and distributions received from equity method investees. The standard became effective on January 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Statement of Cash Flows – Restricted Cash

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18 which clarifies the presentation requirements of restricted cash within the statement of cash flows. The changes in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents during the period should be included in the beginning and ending cash and cash equivalents balance reconciliation on the statement of cash flows. When cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item within the statement of financial position, an entity shall calculate a total cash amount in a narrative or tabular format that agrees to the amount shown on the statement of cash flows.  Details on the nature and amounts of restricted cash should also be disclosed.  The update became effective on January 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The following recently issued accounting pronouncements will become effective for the Company in future periods:

Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

 

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02 to address the tax effects of the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (“TCJA”) on amounts that were initially recognized directly in AOCI. ASU 2018-02 allows an entity to elect a one-time reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings of stranded tax effects due to the enactment of TCJA, equal to the difference between the amount initially charged or credited directly to AOCI at the previously enacted U.S. federal corporate income tax rate and the amount that would have been charged or credited directly to AOCI by using the newly enacted tax rate, excluding the effect of any valuation allowance previously charged to income from continuing operations. ASU 2018-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the provisions of ASU 2018-02 and will determine in a later period if the reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings addressed in the ASU will be elected.

Effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB No. 118”) which allowed SEC registrants to record provisional amounts for the year ended December 31, 2017 due to the complexities involved in accounting for the enactment of TCJA. The Company recognized the estimated income tax effects of TCJA in its 2017 Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with SAB No. 118. Refer to Note 6 for further information regarding the provisional amounts recorded by the Company as of December 31, 2017.

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 which requires lessees to recognize right of use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms greater than twelve months.  This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period.  At this time, the Company has no significant financing leases and only a limited number of operating leases. The result of adoption will be an increase to assets and liabilities by the same amount for the identified operating leases.  The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance and does not expect the adjustment will be material to the Company, assuming there is not an increase in lease activity.

Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04 which simplifies the goodwill impairment test by eliminating Step 2 in the determination on whether goodwill should be considered impaired.  Instead, an impairment charge should equal the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.  The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that reporting period.  The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance and does not expect it to have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12 which improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. The standard also makes certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently assessing the impact that adopting this new accounting standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.