XML 59 R27.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Financial Statement Presentation

Financial Statement Presentation

Pepco Holdings’ unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements should be read along with the annual consolidated financial statements included in PHI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. In the opinion of PHI’s management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which all are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to state fairly Pepco Holdings’ financial condition as of June 30, 2013, in accordance with GAAP. The year-end December 31, 2012 consolidated balance sheet included herein was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. Interim results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 may not be indicative of PHI’s results that will be realized for the full year ending December 31, 2013.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Although Pepco Holdings believes that its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information available to management at the time the estimates are made. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

Significant matters that involve the use of estimates include the assessment of contingencies, future cash flows and fair value amounts for use in asset and goodwill impairment calculations, fair value calculations for derivative instruments, pension and other postretirement benefit assumptions, the assessment of the probability of recovery of regulatory assets, accrual of storm restoration costs, accrual of unbilled revenue, recognition of changes in network service transmission rates for prior service year costs, accrual of self-insurance reserves for general and auto liability claims, accrual of interest related to income taxes, the recognition of income tax benefits for investments in finance leases held in trust associated with PHI’s portfolio of cross-border energy lease investments (see Note (8), “Leasing Activities – Investment in Finance Leases Held in Trust”), and income tax provisions and reserves. Additionally, PHI is subject to legal, regulatory and other proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. PHI records an estimated liability for these proceedings and claims when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the loss is reasonably estimable.

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

PHI assesses its contractual arrangements with variable interest entities to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary and thereby has to consolidate the entities in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 810. The guidance addresses conditions under which an entity should be consolidated based upon variable interests rather than voting interests. Subsidiaries of PHI have the following contractual arrangements to which the guidance applies.

ACE Power Purchase Agreements

PHI, through its ACE subsidiary, is a party to three power purchase agreements (PPAs) with unaffiliated, non-utility generators (NUGs) totaling 459 megawatts (MWs). One of the agreements ends in 2016 and the other two end in 2024. Since 2004, PHI has been unable to obtain sufficient information to determine whether these three entities were variable interest entities or if ACE was the primary beneficiary. As a result, PHI applied the scope exemption from the consolidation guidance for enterprises that have not been able to obtain such information.

 

Purchase activities with the NUGs, including excess power purchases not covered by the PPA, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $53 million and $49 million, respectively, of which approximately $48 million and $47 million, respectively, consisted of power purchases under the PPAs. Purchase activities with the NUGs for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $107 million and $100 million, respectively, of which approximately $103 million and $98 million, respectively, consisted of power purchases under the PPAs. The power purchase costs are recoverable from ACE’s customers through regulated rates.

DPL Renewable Energy Transactions

DPL is subject to Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards (RPS) in the state of Delaware that require it to obtain renewable energy credits (RECs) for energy delivered to its customers. DPL’s costs associated with obtaining RECs to fulfill its RPS obligations are recoverable from its customers by law. As of June 30, 2013, PHI, through its DPL subsidiary, is a party to three land-based wind PPAs in the aggregate amount of 128 MWs and one solar PPA with a 10 MW facility. Each of the facilities associated with these PPAs is operational, and DPL is obligated to purchase energy and RECs in amounts generated and delivered by the wind facilities and solar renewable energy credits (SRECs) from the solar facility up to certain amounts (as set forth below) at rates that are primarily fixed under the respective PPA. PHI has concluded that consolidation is not required for any of these PPAs under the FASB guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities.

DPL is obligated to purchase energy and RECs from one of the wind facilities through 2024 in amounts not to exceed 50 MWs, from the second wind facility through 2031 in amounts not to exceed 40 MWs, and from the third wind facility through 2031 in amounts not to exceed 38 MWs. DPL’s purchases under the three wind PPAs totaled $7 million and $6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. DPL’s purchases under the three wind PPAs totaled $17 million and $15 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The term of the agreement with the solar facility is 20 years and DPL is obligated to purchase SRECs in an amount up to 70 percent of the energy output at a fixed price. DPL’s purchases under the solar agreement were less than $1 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. DPL’s purchases under the solar agreement were less than $1 million for each of the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

On October 18, 2011, the Delaware Public Service Commission (DPSC) approved a tariff submitted by DPL in accordance with the requirements of the RPS specific to fuel cell facilities totaling 30 MWs to be constructed by a qualified fuel cell provider. The tariff and the RPS establish that DPL would be an agent to collect payments in advance from its distribution customers and remit them to the qualified fuel cell provider for each MW hour (MWh) of energy produced by the fuel cell facilities over 21 years. DPL would have no liability to the qualified fuel cell provider other than to remit payments collected from its distribution customers pursuant to the tariff. The RPS provides for a reduction in DPL’s REC requirements based upon the actual energy output of the facilities. At June 30, 2013 and 2012, 15 MWs and 3MWs of capacity were available from fuel cell facilities placed in service under the tariff, respectively. DPL billed $3 million and less than $1 million to distribution customers for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. DPL billed $6 million and less than $1 million to distribution customers for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. DPL has concluded that consolidation under the variable interest entity consolidation guidance is not required for this arrangement.

Atlantic City Electric Transition Funding LLC

Atlantic City Electric Transition Funding LLC (ACE Funding) was established in 2001 by ACE solely for the purpose of securitizing authorized portions of ACE’s recoverable stranded costs through the issuance and sale of bonds (Transition Bonds). The proceeds of the sale of each series of Transition Bonds have been transferred to ACE in exchange for the transfer by ACE to ACE Funding of the right to collect non-bypassable transition bond charges (the Transition Bond Charges) from ACE customers pursuant to bondable stranded costs rate orders issued by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) in an amount sufficient to fund the principal and interest payments on the Transition Bonds and related taxes, expenses and fees (Bondable Transition Property). ACE collects the Transition Bond Charges from its customers on behalf of ACE Funding and the holders of the Transition Bonds. The assets of ACE Funding, including the Bondable Transition Property, and the Transition Bond Charges collected from ACE’s customers, are not available to creditors of ACE. The holders of the Transition Bonds have recourse only to the assets of ACE Funding. ACE owns 100 percent of the equity of ACE Funding and PHI consolidates ACE Funding in its consolidated financial statements as ACE is the primary beneficiary of ACE Funding under the variable interest entity consolidation guidance.

ACE Standard Offer Capacity Agreements

In April 2011, ACE entered into three Standard Offer Capacity Agreements (SOCAs) by order of the NJBPU, each with a different generation company. The SOCAs were established under a New Jersey law enacted to promote the construction of qualified electric generation facilities in New Jersey. The SOCAs are 15-year, financially settled transactions approved by the NJBPU that allow generation companies to receive payments from, or require them to make payments to, ACE based on the difference between the fixed price in the SOCAs and the price for capacity that clears PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM). Each of the other electric distribution companies (EDCs) in New Jersey has entered into SOCAs having the same terms with the same generation companies. ACE’s share of the payments received from or the payments made to the generation companies is currently estimated to be approximately 15 percent, based on its proportionate share of the total New Jersey electric load for all EDCs. The NJBPU has ordered that ACE is obligated to distribute to its distribution customers all payments it receives from the generation companies and may recover from its distribution customers all payments it makes to the generation companies. For additional discussion about the SOCAs, see Note (7), “Regulatory Matters.”

In May 2013, all three generation companies under the SOCAs bid into the PJM 2016-2017 capacity auction. Two of the generators cleared the capacity auction, while the third did not. For each SOCA that clears the capacity auction, ACE records a derivative asset (liability) for the estimated fair value of that SOCA and records an offsetting regulatory liability (asset) as described in more detail in Note (13), “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and Note (14), “Fair Value Disclosures.” Effective July 1, 2013, the SOCA with the third generation company was terminated as the generation company did not clear a PJM capacity auction by the commencement date required under the SOCA. PHI has concluded that consolidation of the generation companies is not required.

Goodwill

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired at the acquisition date. Substantially all of Pepco Holdings’ goodwill was generated by Pepco’s acquisition of Conectiv (now Conectiv, LLC (Conectiv)) in 2002 and is allocated entirely to Power Delivery for purposes of impairment testing based on the aggregation of its components because its utilities have similar characteristics. Pepco Holdings tests its goodwill for impairment annually as of November 1 and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change in the interim that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below the carrying amount of its net assets. Factors that may result in an interim impairment test include, but are not limited to: a change in the identified reporting units; an adverse change in business conditions; a protracted decline in PHI’s stock price causing market capitalization to fall below book value; an adverse regulatory action; or an impairment of long-lived assets in the reporting unit. PHI concluded that an interim impairment test was not required during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Taxes Assessed by a Governmental Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions

Taxes Assessed by a Governmental Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions

Taxes included in Pepco Holdings’ gross revenues were $83 million and $87 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Taxes included in Pepco Holdings’ gross revenues were $166 million and $174 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Reclassifications and Adjustments

Reclassifications and Adjustments

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to the current period presentation. The following reclassifications and adjustments have been recorded and are not considered material either individually or in the aggregate:

DPL Operating Revenue Adjustment

In the second quarter of 2012, DPL recorded an adjustment to correct an overstatement of unbilled revenue in its natural gas distribution business related to prior periods. The adjustment resulted in a decrease in Operating Revenue of $1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

Income Tax Expense Adjustments

In the second quarter of 2012, Pepco recorded an adjustment to reduce Income Tax expense as a result of the reversal of interest expense erroneously recorded on certain effectively settled income tax positions in the first quarter of 2012. This adjustment resulted in a decrease to Income Tax expense of $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Revision to Prior Period Financial Statements

Revision to Prior Period Financial Statements

PCI Deferred Income Tax Liability Adjustment

Since 1999, PCI had not recorded a deferred tax liability related to a temporary difference between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of an investment in a wholly owned partnership. In the second quarter of 2013, PHI re-evaluated this accounting treatment and found it to be in error, requiring an adjustment related to prior periods. PHI determined that the cumulative adjustment required for the periods prior to 2008 (2008 representing the earliest year for which selected consolidated financial data were presented in Part II, Item 6. “Selected Financial Data” included in PHI’s 2012 Form 10-K) was a charge to earnings of $32 million. The adjustment was not considered to be material, individually or in the aggregate, to previously issued financial statements; however, the cumulative impact would have been material to PHI’s reported net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, as well as estimated full year 2013 results, if corrected in 2013. As a result, PHI has revised its prior period financial statements to correct for this error, and the table below illustrates the effects of this revision on PHI’s consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 for those line items affected (these revisions have no impact on PHI’s consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the periods reported in these consolidated financial statements).

 

     As Filed     Adjustment     As Revised  
     (millions of dollars)  

March 31, 2013

      

Deferred income tax liabilities, net

   $  2,685     $ 32      $  2,717  

Total deferred credits

     4,270       32        4,302  

Retained earnings

     612       (32 )     580  

Total equity

     4,278       (32 )     4,246  

December 31, 2012

      

Deferred income tax liabilities, net

   $ 3,176     $ 32      $ 3,208  

Total deferred credits

     4,819  (a)     32        4,851  

Retained earnings

     1,109       (32 )     1,077  

Total equity

     4,446       (32 )     4,414  

December 31, 2011

      

Deferred income tax liabilities, net

   $ 2,863     $ 32      $ 2,895  

Total deferred credits

     4,533        32        4,565   

Retained earnings

     1,072        (32     1,040   

Total equity

     4,336        (32     4,304   

December 31, 2010

      

Retained earnings

   $ 1,059     $ (32 )   $ 1,027  

December 31, 2009

      

Retained earnings

   $ 1,268     $ (32 )   $ 1,236  

 

(a) The amount of total deferred credits differs from the amount reported in PHI’s 2012 Form 10-K due to certain reclassifications.
Potomac Electric Power Co [Member]
 
Financial Statement Presentation

Financial Statement Presentation

Pepco’s unaudited financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. Therefore, these financial statements should be read along with the annual financial statements included in Pepco’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. In the opinion of Pepco’s management, the unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments (which all are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to state fairly Pepco’s financial condition as of June 30, 2013, in accordance with GAAP. The year-end December 31, 2012 balance sheet included herein was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. Interim results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 may not be indicative of results that will be realized for the full year ending December 31, 2013.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Although Pepco believes that its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information available to management at the time the estimates are made. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

Significant matters that involve the use of estimates include the assessment of contingencies, future cash flows and fair value amounts for use in asset impairment evaluations, pension and other postretirement benefits assumptions, the assessment of the probability of recovery of regulatory assets, accrual of storm restoration costs, accrual of unbilled revenue, recognition of changes in network service transmission rates for prior service year costs, accrual of self-insurance reserves for general and auto liability claims, and income tax provisions and reserves. Additionally, Pepco is subject to legal, regulatory and other proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Pepco records an estimated liability for these proceedings and claims when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the loss is reasonably estimable.

Taxes Assessed by a Governmental Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions

Taxes Assessed by a Governmental Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions

Taxes included in Pepco’s gross revenues were $77 million and $80 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $153 million and $159 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Reclassifications and Adjustments

Reclassifications and Adjustments

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to the current period presentation. The following adjustments have been recorded and are not considered material either individually or in the aggregate:

Income Tax Expense Adjustments

In the second quarter of 2012, Pepco recorded an adjustment to reduce Income Tax expense as a result of the reversal of interest expense erroneously recorded on certain effectively settled income tax positions in the first quarter of 2012. This adjustment resulted in a decrease to Income Tax expense of $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Atlantic City Electric Co [Member]
 
Financial Statement Presentation

Financial Statement Presentation

ACE’s unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements should be read along with the annual consolidated financial statements included in ACE’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. In the opinion of ACE’s management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which all are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to state fairly ACE’s financial condition as of June 30, 2013, in accordance with GAAP. The year-end December 31, 2012 consolidated balance sheet included herein was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. Interim results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 may not be indicative of ACE’s results that will be realized for the full year ending December 31, 2013.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Although ACE believes that its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information available to management at the time the estimates are made. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

Significant matters that involve the use of estimates include the assessment of contingencies, future cash flows and fair value amounts for use in asset impairment evaluations, fair value calculations for derivative instruments, pension and other postretirement benefits assumptions, the assessment of the probability of recovery of regulatory assets, accrual of storm restoration costs, accrual of unbilled revenue, recognition of changes in network service transmission rates for prior service year costs, accrual of self-insurance reserves for general and auto liability claims, and income tax provisions and reserves. Additionally, ACE is subject to legal, regulatory and other proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. ACE records an estimated liability for these proceedings and claims when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the loss is reasonably estimable.

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

ACE assesses its contractual arrangements with variable interest entities to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary and thereby has to consolidate the entities in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 810. The guidance addresses conditions under which an entity should be consolidated based upon variable interests rather than voting interests.

ACE Power Purchase Agreements

ACE is a party to three power purchase agreements (PPAs) with unaffiliated, non-utility generators (NUGs) totaling 459 megawatts (MWs). One of the agreements ends in 2016 and the other two end in 2024. Since 2004, ACE has been unable to obtain sufficient information to determine whether these three entities were variable interest entities or if ACE was the primary beneficiary. As a result, ACE applied the scope exemption from the consolidation guidance for enterprises that have not been able to obtain such information.

Purchase activities with the NUGs, including excess power purchases not covered by the PPA, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $53 million and $49 million, respectively, of which approximately $48 million and $47 million, respectively, consisted of power purchases under the PPAs. Purchase activities with the NUGs for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $107 million and $100 million, respectively, of which approximately $103 million and $98 million, respectively, consisted of power purchases under the PPAs. The power purchase costs are recoverable from ACE’s customers through regulated rates.

Atlantic City Electric Transition Funding LLC

Atlantic City Electric Transition Funding LLC (ACE Funding) was established in 2001 by ACE solely for the purpose of securitizing authorized portions of ACE’s recoverable stranded costs through the issuance and sale of bonds (Transition Bonds). The proceeds of the sale of each series of Transition Bonds have been transferred to ACE in exchange for the transfer by ACE to ACE Funding of the right to collect non-bypassable transition bond charges (the Transition Bond Charges) from ACE customers pursuant to bondable stranded costs rate orders issued by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) in an amount sufficient to fund the principal and interest payments on the Transition Bonds and related taxes, expenses and fees (Bondable Transition Property). ACE collects the Transition Bond Charges from its customers on behalf of ACE Funding and the holders of the Transition Bonds. The assets of ACE Funding, including the Bondable Transition Property, and the Transition Bond Charges collected from ACE’s customers, are not available to creditors of ACE. The holders of the Transition Bonds have recourse only to the assets of ACE Funding. ACE owns 100 percent of the equity of ACE Funding and PHI consolidates ACE Funding in its consolidated financial statements as ACE is the primary beneficiary of ACE Funding under the variable interest entity consolidation guidance.

ACE Standard Offer Capacity Agreements

In April 2011, ACE entered into three Standard Offer Capacity Agreements (SOCAs) by order of the NJBPU, each with a different generation company. The SOCAs were established under a New Jersey law enacted to promote the construction of qualified electric generation facilities in New Jersey. The SOCAs are 15-year, financially settled transactions approved by the NJBPU that allow generation companies to receive payments from, or require them to make payments to, ACE based on the difference between the fixed price in the SOCAs and the price for capacity that clears PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM). Each of the other electric distribution companies (EDCs) in New Jersey has entered into SOCAs having the same terms with the same generation companies. ACE’s share of the payments received from or the payments made to the generation companies is currently estimated to be approximately 15 percent, based on its proportionate share of the total New Jersey electric load for all EDCs. The NJBPU has ordered that ACE is obligated to distribute to its distribution customers all payments it receives from the generation companies and may recover from its distribution customers all payments it makes to the generation companies. For additional discussion about the SOCAs, see Note (6), “Regulatory Matters.”

In May 2013, all three generation companies under the SOCAs bid into the PJM 2016-2017 capacity auction. Two of the generators cleared the capacity auction, while the third did not. For each SOCA that clears the capacity auction, ACE records a derivative asset (liability) for the estimated fair value of that SOCA and records an offsetting regulatory liability (asset) as described in more detail in Note (10), “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and Note (11), “Fair Value Disclosures.” Effective July 1, 2013, the SOCA with the third generation company was terminated as the generation company did not clear a PJM capacity auction by the commencement date required under the SOCA. ACE has concluded that consolidation of the generation companies is not required.

Taxes Assessed by a Governmental Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions

Taxes Assessed by a Governmental Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions

Taxes included in ACE’s gross revenues were $2 million and $3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $5 million and $7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Delmarva Power & Light Co/De [Member]
 
Financial Statement Presentation

Financial Statement Presentation

DPL’s unaudited financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. Therefore, these financial statements should be read along with the annual financial statements included in DPL’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. In the opinion of DPL’s management, the financial statements contain all adjustments (which all are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to state fairly DPL’s financial condition as of June 30, 2013, in accordance with GAAP. The year-end December 31, 2012 balance sheet included herein was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. Interim results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 may not be indicative of DPL’s results that will be realized for the full year ending December 31, 2013.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Although DPL believes that its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information available to management at the time the estimates are made. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

Significant matters that involve the use of estimates include the assessment of contingencies, future cash flows and fair value amounts for use in asset and goodwill impairment evaluations, fair value calculations for derivative instruments, pension and other postretirement benefits assumptions, the assessment of the probability of recovery of regulatory assets, accrual of storm restoration costs, accrual of unbilled revenue, recognition of changes in network service transmission rates for prior service year costs, accrual of self-insurance reserves for general and auto liability claims, and income tax provisions and reserves. Additionally, DPL is subject to legal, regulatory and other proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. DPL records an estimated liability for these proceedings and claims when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the loss is reasonably estimable.

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities - DPL Renewable Energy Transactions

DPL assesses its contractual arrangements with variable interest entities to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary and thereby has to consolidate the entities in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 810. The guidance addresses conditions under which an entity should be consolidated based upon variable interests rather than voting interests.

DPL is subject to Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards (RPS) in the state of Delaware that require it to obtain renewable energy credits (RECs) for energy delivered to its customers. DPL’s costs associated with obtaining RECs to fulfill its RPS obligations are recoverable from its customers by law. As of June 30, 2013, PHI, through its DPL subsidiary, is a party to three land-based wind power purchase agreements (PPAs) in the aggregate amount of 128 megawatts (MWs) and one solar PPA with a 10 MW facility. Each of the facilities associated with these PPAs is operational, and DPL is obligated to purchase energy and RECs in amounts generated and delivered by the wind facilities and solar renewable energy credits (SRECs) from the solar facility up to certain amounts (as set forth below) at rates that are primarily fixed under the respective PPA. PHI has concluded that consolidation is not required for any of these PPAs under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities.

DPL is obligated to purchase energy and RECs from one of the wind facilities through 2024 in amounts not to exceed 50 MWs, from the second wind facility through 2031 in amounts not to exceed 40 MWs, and from the third wind facility through 2031 in amounts not to exceed 38 MWs. DPL’s purchases under the three wind PPAs totaled $7 million and $6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. DPL’s purchases under the three wind PPAs totaled $17 million and $15 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The term of the agreement with the solar facility is 20 years and DPL is obligated to purchase SRECs in an amount up to 70 percent of the energy output at a fixed price. DPL’s purchases under the solar agreement were less than $1 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. DPL’s purchases under the solar agreement were less than $1 million for each of the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

On October 18, 2011, the Delaware Public Service Commission (DPSC) approved a tariff submitted by DPL in accordance with the requirements of the RPS specific to fuel cell facilities totaling 30 MWs to be constructed by a qualified fuel cell provider. The tariff and the RPS establish that DPL would be an agent to collect payments in advance from its distribution customers and remit them to the qualified fuel cell provider for each MW hour (MWh) of energy produced by the fuel cell facilities over 21 years. DPL would have no liability to the qualified fuel cell provider other than to remit payments collected from its distribution customers pursuant to the tariff. The RPS provides for a reduction in DPL’s REC requirements based upon the actual energy output of the facilities. At June 30, 2013 and 2012, 15 MWs and 3MWs of capacity were available from fuel cell facilities placed in service under the tariff, respectively. DPL billed $3 million and less than $1 million to distribution customers for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. DPL billed $6 million and less than $1 million to distribution customers for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. DPL has concluded that consolidation under the variable interest entity consolidation guidance is not required for this arrangement.

Goodwill

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired at the acquisition date. All of DPL’s goodwill was generated by DPL’s acquisition of Conowingo Power Company in 1995. DPL tests its goodwill for impairment annually as of November 1 and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change in the interim that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of DPL below the carrying amount of its net assets. Factors that may result in an interim impairment test include, but are not limited to: a change in the identified reporting units; an adverse change in business conditions; an adverse regulatory action; or an impairment of DPL’s long-lived assets. DPL concluded that an interim impairment test was not required during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Taxes Assessed by a Governmental Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions

Taxes Assessed by a Governmental Authority on Revenue-Producing Transactions

Taxes included in DPL’s gross revenues were $4 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and $8 million for each of the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Reclassifications and Adjustments

Reclassifications and Adjustments

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to the current period presentation. The following adjustment has been recorded and is not considered material:

In the second quarter of 2012, DPL recorded an adjustment to correct an overstatement of unbilled revenue in its natural gas distribution business related to prior periods. The adjustment resulted in a decrease in Operating Revenue of $1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012