-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, EIkSWHpt2iFCFf72uchvUUzbVOcp/ue5fsV0MnyXiCBdsgQfuWhYUc1QUxuVLr4G jBf7aQlQ+c+uuNrSdneL4g== 0000815910-06-000037.txt : 20060809 0000815910-06-000037.hdr.sgml : 20060809 20060808205707 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000815910-06-000037 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20060630 FILED AS OF DATE: 20060809 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20060808 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000815910 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: COMPUTER PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT, NEC [3577] IRS NUMBER: 221866172 STATE OF INCORPORATION: NJ FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-24712 FILM NUMBER: 061014780 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: COLES ROAD AT RTE 42 CITY: BLACKWOOD STATE: NJ ZIP: 08012 BUSINESS PHONE: 609-228-8100 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: COLES ROAD ROUTE 42 CITY: BLACKWOOD STATE: NJ ZIP: 08012 10-Q 1 q22006.txt 10Q FOR SECOND QUARTER ENDING 6/30/06 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ---------- FORM 10-Q (X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _____ to _____ Commission file number 0-24712 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) New Jersey 22-1866172 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 90 Coles Road, Blackwood, New Jersey 08012 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (856) 228-8100 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No __ Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X] As of July 31, 2006, there were 22,686,819 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, outstanding. METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. INDEX Page No. Part I - Financial Information Item 1. Financial Statements Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005 3 Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) -Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 4 Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity (unaudited) - Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) - Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) 7 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 17 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 28 Item 4. Controls and Procedures 28 Part II - Other Information Item 1. Legal Proceedings 29 Item 1A. Risk Factors 30 Item 4. Submission of Mattrs to a Vote of Security Holders 30 Item 6. Exhibits 32 Signatures 33 PART I - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Item 1. Financial Statements Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets (amounts in thousands except share and per share data) June 30, December 31, 2006 2005 ---- ---- (Unaudited) Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 40,138 $ 49,463 Marketable securities 25,599 24,475 Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $706 and $627, respectively 49,583 48,462 Inventory 35,682 29,364 Deferred income taxes 699 801 Other current assets 4,645 5,599 --------- --------- Total current assets 156,346 158,164 Property, plant and equipment, net 20,873 20,402 Goodwill 26,336 25,745 Computer software, net 7,756 8,949 Other intangibles, net 9,161 8,409 Deferred income taxes 1,352 4,262 Other assets 282 251 --------- --------- Total assets $ 222,106 $ 226,182 ========= ========= Liabilities and shareholders' equity Current liabilities: Lines of credit $ 16,556 $ 15,989 Current portion of notes payable 16 2,444 Accounts payable 12,209 14,200 Accrued expenses 13,887 32,509 Deferred contract revenue 981 739 --------- --------- Total current liabilities 43,649 65,881 Notes payable, net of current portion 4 3 Deferred income taxes 2,502 8 Shareholders' equity: Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 500,000 shares authorized; none issued - - Common stock, $0.01 par value: 30,000,000 shares authorized; 22,674,769 and 22,320,014 shares issued and outstanding on June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively 227 223 Additional paid-in capital 98,970 92,828 Retained earnings 77,745 68,975 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (991) (1,736) ---------- --------- Total shareholders' equity 175,951 160,290 ---------- --------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 222,106 $ 226,182 ========== ========= See accompanying notes. Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (amounts in thousands except share data) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2006 2005 2006 2005 ---- ---- ---- ---- Sales $ 62,551 $ 48,604 $122,786 $ 95,455 Cost of sales 37,337 27,044 73,746 53,777 -------- -------- -------- -------- Gross profit 25,214 21,560 49,040 41,678 Selling, general and administrative expenses 16,032 12,139 30,819 23,534 Research and development expenses 2,763 2,218 5,249 4,170 -------- -------- -------- -------- Operating income (expenses) 6,419 7,203 12,972 13,974 Other income (expenses) Interest income 630 416 1,260 701 Interest expense (253) (304) (1,014) (567) Other income (expense), net 95 (45) 485 (742) -------- -------- -------- -------- Total other income (expense) 472 67 731 (608) -------- -------- -------- -------- Income before provision for income taxes 6,891 7,270 13,703 13,366 Provision for income taxes 2,481 2,617 4,933 4,812 -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income $ 4,410 $ 4,653 $ 8,770 $ 8,554 ======== ======== ======== ======== Earnings per share: Basic earnings per share $ 0.19 $ 0.21 $ 0.39 $ 0.39 ======== ======== ======== ======== Diluted earnings per share $ 0.19 $ 0.20 $ 0.38 $ 0.37 ======== ======== ======== ======== See accompanying notes. Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited) (amounts in thousands) Accumulated Additional Other Common Paid-in Retained Comprehensive Stock Capital Earnings Loss Total ---- ------- -------- -------- -------- Balances, January 1, 2006 $223 $92,828 $ 68,975 $ (1,736) $160,290 Comprehensive income: Net income - - 8,770 - 8,770 Other comprehensive income- foreign currency translation adjustment - - - 745 745 -------- Total comprehensive income - - - - 9,515 Stock-based compensation - 2,641 - - 2,641 Exercise of stock options 4 1,496 - - 1,500 Tax benefit from exercise of stock options - 1,841 - - 1,841 Stock issued through employee stock purchase plan - 164 - - 164 -------------------------------------------- Balances, June 30, 2006 $227 $98,970 $ 77,745 $ (991) $175,951 ============================================ See accompanying notes. Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (amounts in thousands) Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 2005 -------- -------- Operating activities Net income $ 8,770 $ 8,554 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: Depreciation 1,871 1,741 Amortization 1,688 1,665 Stock-based compensation 2,641 - Deferred income tax benefit (478) - Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation (1,841) - (Gain) loss on disposal of equipment (3) 40 Symbol litigation settlement payment (14,882) - Note discount amortization 16 56 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable 397 (4,625) Inventory (5,549) 919 Other current assets 1,187 122 Other assets (31) (69) Accounts payable (2,183) (1,587) Accrued expenses 3,780 321) Other liabilities - (75) ------- ------- Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (4,617) 7,062 Investing activities Purchase of property, plant and equipment (2,274) (2,081) Purchase of minority interest in subsidiary - (1,213) Purchases of marketable securities (101,311) (108,775) Sales of marketable securities 100,187 105,575 Patents and trademarks (1,247) (527) Proceeds from sale of property 33 6 ------- ------- Net cash used in investing activities (4,612) (7,015) Financing activities Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan 1,664 1,249 Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation 1,841 - Net (repayments) borrowings on lines of credit (508) 3,721 Principal payments on notes payable (2,400) (367) Capital lease payments (50) (71) Net cash provided by ------- ------- financing activities 547 4,532 Effect of exchange rates on cash (643) 763 ------- ------- Net (decrease)increase in cash and cash equivalents (9,325) 5,342 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 49,463 36,340 ------- ------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 40,138 $41,682 ======== ======= Supplemental Disclosure: Cash paid for interest $ 926 $ 403 ======== ======= Cash paid for income taxes $ 2,310 $ 2,603 ======== ======= See accompanying notes. METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2006 (amounts in thousands except per share data) (Unaudited) 1. Business Metrologic Instruments, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") design, manufacture and market bar code scanning and high-speed automated data capture solutions using laser, holographic and vision-based technologies. The Company offers expertise in one-dimensional and two-dimensional bar code reading, portable data collection, optical character recognition, image lift, and parcel dimensioning and singulation detection for customers in retail, commercial, manufacturing, transportation and logistics, and postal and parcel delivery industries. Additionally, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Adaptive Optics Associates, Inc. ("AOA"), the Company is engaged in developing, manufacturing, marketing and distributing custom electro-optical and opto-mechanical systems which include wavefront correction, industrial inspection, and scanning and dimensioning systems for commercial and government customers. The Company's products are sold in more than 110 countries worldwide through the Company's sales, service and distribution offices located in North and South America, Europe and Asia. 2. Accounting Policies Interim Financial Information The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements have been included. The results of the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for a full fiscal year. The Consolidated Financial Statements and these Notes should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 contained therein. Use of Estimates The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Reclassifications Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Investments Marketable securities consist of investments in auction rate securities and other similar type instruments. All of these investments are classified as available-for-sale. The costs of these marketable securities approximate their market values as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The Company invests excess cash in a variety of marketable securities, including auction rate securities. Auction rate securities have long-term underlying maturities, but have interest rates that are reset every 90 days or less, at which time the securities can typically be purchased or sold, creating a highly liquid market. The Company's intent is not to hold these securities to maturity, but rather to use the interest rate reset feature to provide liquidity as necessary. The Company's investment in these securities provides higher yields than money market and other cash equivalent investments. 3. Earnings per share Basic earnings per share ("Basic EPS") is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share ("Diluted EPS") considers the impact of potentially dilutive securities except in periods in which there is a loss because the inclusion of the potential common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect. Diluted EPS excludes potential common shares related to our share-based compensation plans because the inclusion of the potential common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, potential common shares excluded were 1,238,299 and 817,802, respectively for the three month period and 1,118,375 and 796,527 respectively, for the six month period. The following table reconciles the numerator and denominator of the computations of Diluted EPS for common stockholders for the periods presented: Three Months ended June 30, ----------------------------------------------------------- 2006 2005 -------------------------- ----------------------------- Per Per Net Shares Share Net Shares Share Income Amount Income Amount ------- ---------- ------ ------- ---------- -------- Basic EPS $4,410 22,668,702 $0.19 $4,653 22,136,353 $0.21 Effect of dilutive securities 567,824 940,005 ------- ---------- ------ ------- ---------- -------- Diluted EPS $4,410 23,236,526 $0.19 $4,653 23,076,358 $0.20 ------- ---------- ------ ------- ---------- -------- Six Months ended June 30, ----------------------------------------------------------- 2006 2005 -------------------------- ----------------------------- Per Per Net Shares Share Net Shares Share Income Amount Income Amount ------- ---------- ------ ------- ---------- -------- Basic EPS $8,770 22,549,895 $0.39 $8,554 22,021,809 $0.39 Effect of dilutive securities 671,135 1,078,224 ------- ---------- ------ ------- ---------- -------- Diluted EPS $8,770 23,221,030 $0.38 $8,554 23,100,033 $0.37 ------- ---------- ------ ------- ---------- -------- 4. Inventory Inventory consists of the following: June 30, 2006 December 31, 2005 -------------- ------------------ Raw materials $ 12,264 $ 10,368 Work-in-process 4,304 4,316 Finished goods 19,114 14,680 ------ ------ Total $ 35,682 $ 29,364 ------ ------ 5. Comprehensive Income The Company's total comprehensive income was as follows: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2006 2005 2006 2005 ---- ---- ---- ---- Net income $ 4,410 $ 4,653 $ 8,770 $ 8,554 Other comprehensive income (loss): Change in equity due to foreign currency translation adjustments 379 (902) 745 (1,198) ------- ------- ------- ------- Comprehensive income $ 4,789 $ 3,751 $ 9,515 $ 7,356 ======= ======= ======= ======= 6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2006 consist of the following: Industrial Data Automation/ Capture & Optical Collection Systems Total --------- ---------- --------- Balance as of January 1, 2006 $ 15,067 $ 10,678 $ 25,745 Foreign currency translation adjustments 591 - 591 --------- --------- --------- Balance as of June 30, 2006 $ 15,658 $ 10,678 $ 26,336 ========= ========= ========= Other Intangibles The following table reflects the components of identifiable intangible assets: June 30, 2006 December 31, 2005 -------------------------- -------------------------- Amortizable Gross Net Gross Net Life Carrying Accumulated Book Carrying Accumulated Book (years) Amount Amortization Value Amount Amorization Value ----------- --------------------------- --------------------------- Computer software 5 $11,920 $(4,164) $ 7,756 $11,920 $(2,971) $ 8,949 Patents and trademarks 17 10,454 (3,177) 7,277 9,207 (2,901) 6,306 Holographic technology 10 1,082 (1,082) - 1,082 (1,062) 20 Advance license fee 17 2,750 (1,158) 1,592 2,750 (1,075) 1,675 Covenants not to compete 3 700 (408) 292 700 (292) 408 ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ Total $26,906 $(9,989) $16,917 $25,659 $(8,301) $17,358 ====== ======= ====== ====== ====== ====== The Company has determined that the lives previously assigned to these finite-lived assets are still appropriate and has recorded $1,688 and $1,665 of amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. 7. Stock-Based Compensation The Company adopted SFAS 123(R), "Share-based Payments" ("SFAS No. 123(R)") on January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that the fair value of stock-based compensation be recognized in financial statements. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company followed Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for stock compensation. The Company elected the modified prospective method in adopting SFAS No. 123(R). Under this method, the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of adoption. In addition, the unrecognized expense of awards not yet vested at the date of adoption is recognized in net income in the periods after the date of adoption using the same valuation method (Black-Scholes) and assumptions determined under the original provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as disclosed in our previous filings. Under the provision of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company recorded $1,091 and $7 of stock-based compensation expense during the three-month period ended June 30, 2006 in relation to its Stock Option Plans and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, respectively. The Company recorded $2,618 and $23 of stock-based compensation expense during the six-month period ended June 30, 2006 in relation to its Stock Option Plans and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, respectively. The Company recorded an associated tax benefit related to the stock-based compensation expense of $395 and $951 during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively. SFAS No. 123(R) also required the Company to change its classification, in our consolidated statement of cash flows, of any tax benefits realized upon the exercise of stock options in excess of that which is associated with the expense recognized for financial reporting purposes. These amounts totaling $145 and $1,841 for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 are presented as financing cash inflows rather than as reductions of income taxes paid in our consolidated statements of cash flows. Stock Option Plans During 2004, the Company's Board of Directors adopted the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan as the 1994 Incentive Plan had expired. The Company's Board of Directors has granted incentive and non-qualified stock options pursuant to the Company's Incentive Plans to certain eligible employees and board members. The shares issued will either be authorized and previously unissued common stock or issued common stock reacquired by the Company. The total number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan is 1,500,000. Shares canceled for any reason without having been exercised shall again be available for issuance under the Plan. An aggregate of 448,850 shares were available for grant under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan at June 30, 2006. Options granted under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan become exercisable over periods ranging from one to four years. Each option shall expire no more than ten years after becoming exercisable. The weighted-average fair value of the options granted under the stock option plans for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $9.66 and $12.04, respectively. We utilized the Black-Scholes valuation model for estimating these fair values, with the following weighted-average assumptions: Six Months Ended June 30, -------------------- 2006 2005 Expected Volatility 56.0 % 72.2 % Average risk-free interest rate 4.6 % 3.9 % Expected life (in years) 4.2 4.7 % Dividend yield 0.0 % 0.0 % The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that we have never paid cash dividends and have no present intention to pay cash dividends. Expected volatility is generally based on the historical volatility of our common stock over the period commensurate with the expected life of the options. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the U.S. Federal Reserve rate in effect at the time of grant. The expected life calculation is based on the observed and expected time to the exercise of options by our employees based on historical exercise patterns for similar type options. Based on our historical experience of pre-vesting option cancellations, the Company has assumed an annualized forfeiture rate of 2.2% for our options. Under the true-up provisions of SFAS No.123(R), we will record additional expense if the actual forfeiture rate is lower than we estimated, and will record a recovery of prior expense if the actual forfeiture is higher than we estimated. The amortization of stock compensation under SFAS 123(R) for the period after its adoption, and under APB 25 or SFAS 123 (pro forma disclosure) for the period prior to its adoption was calculated using the accelerated method in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") Interpretation ("FIN") No. 28. Total compensation cost of options granted but not yet vested, as of June 30, 2006, was $6.1 million, which is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.54 years. The following table summarizes activity under all stock option plans: Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 ------------------------------------------------- Weighted Weighted Average Average Aggregate Exercise Remaining Intrinsic Shares Price Per Contractual Value Outstanding Share Term (000's) ----------- --------- ----------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2005 1,712,553 $11.72 Options Granted 474,900 $20.16 Options Exercised (340,748) $ 4.38 Options Cancelled (47,250) $14.19 ---------- Balance at June 30, 2006 1,799,455 $15.27 7.80 $ 6,350 ========== Exercisable at June 30, 2006 712,212 $12.15 6.72 $ 4,144 SFAS No. 123R requires us to present pro-forma information for the comparative period prior to the adoption as if we had accounted for all our stock options under the fair value method of the original SFAS 123. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based compensation in the comparable period in 2005: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 June 30, 2005 (Pro forma) (Pro forma) Net income: As reported $ 4,653 $ 8,554 Deduct: (total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of related taxes) (747) (1,465) -------- -------- Pro forma net income $ 3,906 $ 7,089 ======== ======== Earnings per share: Basic: As reported $ 0.21 $ 0.39 Pro forma 0.18 0.32 Diluted: As reported $ 0.20 $ 0.37 Pro forma 0.17 0.31 Employee Stock Purchase Plan The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan whereby eligible employees have the opportunity to acquire the Company's common stock quarterly through payroll deductions, at 90% of the lower of (a) the fair market value of the stock on the first day of the applicable quarterly offering period or (b) the fair market value of the stock on the last day of the applicable quarterly offering period. This plan is considered a compensatory plan under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). 8. Business Segment Information The Company generates its revenue from the sale of laser bar code scanners primarily to distributors, value-added resellers, original equipment manufacturers and directly to end users, in locations throughout the world. No individual customer accounted for 10% or more of revenues in the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 or 2005. The Company manages its business on a business segment basis dividing the business into two major segments: Data Capture and Collection and Industrial Automation/Optical Systems. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of the significant accounting policies. A summary of the business segment operations for the three-and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is included below: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2006 2005 2006 2005 --------------------- -------------------- Business segment net sales: Data Capture and Collection $ 51,059 $ 39,128 $ 101,329 $ 75,656 Industrial Automation/Optical Systems 11,492 9,476 21,457 19,799 --------------------- -------------------- Total $ 62,551 $ 48,604 $ 122,786 $ 95,455 --------------------- -------------------- Business segment gross profit: Data Capture and Collection $ 22,241 $ 19,095 $ 43,076 $ 36,358 Industrial Automation/Optical Systems 2,973 2,465 5,964 5,320 --------------------- -------------------- Total $ 25,214 $ 21,560 $ 49,040 $ 41,678 --------------------- -------------------- Business segment operating income: Data Capture and Collection $ 6,587 $ 6,932 $ 12,977 $ 12,829 Industrial Automation/Optical Systems (168) 271 (5) 1,145 --------------------- -------------------- Total $ 6,419 $ 7,203 $ 12,972 $ 13,974 --------------------- -------------------- Total other income (expenses) $ 472 $ 67 $ 731 $ (608) --------------------- -------------------- Income before provision for income taxes $ 6,891 $ 7,270 $ 13,703 $ 13,366 --------------------- -------------------- 9. Acquisitions and Asset Purchases Visible-RF, LLC On May 5, 2006, the Company acquired all of the assets of Visible-RF, LLC, a privately held start-up company located in Needham, MA for $750. The acquisition of the assets of Visible-RF, LLC represents a significant addition to the Company's technology portfolio. This technology combines the benefits of a paper label with the advantages of RFID to display visible information that is updated via a wireless signal. The Company allocated the cost to intangibles for the Visible-RF patent portfolio which is being amortized over its estimated useful life of 17 years. Omniplanar, Inc. On September 24, 2004, the Company acquired 100% of the common stock of Omniplanar, Inc. ("Omniplanar"), an imaging software company, for $12,851, at present value, including acquisition costs and assumed liabilities. The Company paid $9,050 at closing, $1,950 during the year ended December 31, 2005 and $1,950 in March 2006. Omniplanar supplies a complete package of bar code reading software for 2D imaging for fixed position, conveyor belt and hand held readers which can be optimized for specific hardware applications. The acquisition of Omniplanar represents a significant addition to the Company's technology portfolio. The Company has licensed the SwiftDecoder software since the year 2000 for use in its iQ(R) line of industrial vision-based products. The Company intends to make use of this software's unique decoding ability in other products as well. The assets acquired have been recorded at their estimated fair values. The results of operations for Omniplanar have been included in the Industrial Automation/Optical Systems business segment. In connection with the acquisition, the Company allocated $12,620 to identifiable intangible assets comprising $11,920 of computer software which is being amortized over 5 years and $700 to a non-compete agreement which is being amortized over 3 years. Metrologic do Brasil On February 4, 2003, the Company paid cash of $71 and signed three annual promissory notes with a total discounted value of $204 for the remaining 49% interest in Metrologic do Brasil. During the period ended March 31, 2006, the Company paid the final promissory note in the amount of $75. The total purchase price and costs in excess of assets acquired (goodwill) was $275. Metrologic Eria Iberica ("MEI") On August 5, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase the remaining 49% interest in MEI for a purchase price of 5,900 Euros. Payments were being made in twelve quarterly installments over three years which commenced August 5, 2003 with a scheduled maturity date of April 3, 2006. On December 1, 2005, the Company accelerated the payments and purchased the remaining 23% interest for approximately 2,700 Euros or $3,200 at the exchange rate on December 31, 2005. The aggregate purchase price was 5,854 Euros or $7,099 at various exchange rates over the installment period. The Company now owns 100% of MEI. 10. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 151, "Inventory Costs-An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4" ("SFAS No. 151"). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, "Inventory Pricing," to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that such items be recognized as current-period charges, regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal" as stated in ARB 43. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or liquidity. In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments-An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140" ("SFAS No. 155"). SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation to be accounted for as a whole on a fair value basis, at the holders' election. SFAS No. 155 also clarifies and amends certain other provisions of SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140. This statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or liquidity. In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 156, "Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets-An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 140" ("SFAS No. 156"). SFAS No. 156 provides guidance on the accounting for servicing assets and liabilities when an entity undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract. This statement is effective for all transactions in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 156 will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or liquidity. In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 clarifies the way companies are to account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements and prescribes a consistent recognition threshold and measurement attribute for recognizing, derecognizing, and measuring the tax benefits of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, on a tax return. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, although early adoption is permitted. The Company does not plan to adopt early and is currently in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the Interpretation will have on the Company's consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or liquidity. 11. Legal Matters Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Metrologic On May 3, 2002, we were served with a lawsuit that was filed on April 12, 2002 by Symbol Technologies, Inc. ("Symbol"), in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York alleging that we were in breach of the terms of the License Agreement between us and Symbol (the "Symbol Agreement"). The Complaint sought a declaratory judgment from the Court that we were in breach of the Symbol Agreement. On March 31, 2003, the Court entered its decision on the parties' respective motions for summary judgment, and finding in our favor, the Court dismissed certain counts of Symbol's complaint. On April 9, 2003, Symbol voluntarily dismissed the remaining counts of the complaint. Symbol filed its Notice of Appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on May 7, 2003. On December 23, 2003, the Court of Appeals dismissed Symbol's appeal in this matter. In the interim, Symbol decided to proceed with the arbitration for which the Company had filed a Demand in June 2002, which had been stayed pending the decision by the lower court. On June 26, 2003, Symbol filed an Amended Answer and Counterclaims asserting that (a) eleven of Metrologic's products are royalty bearing products, as defined under the Symbol Agreement, and (b) in the alternative, those products infringe upon one or more of Symbol's patents. In February 2005, the arbitrator entered an interim award, finding that eight of the products are not royalty bearing products under the Symbol Agreement but that three of the products are royalty bearing products. In August 2005, the arbitrator entered a final ruling in the arbitration awarding Symbol past royalties on certain of the Company's products plus interest. Symbol then filed a motion to enter the judgment with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In response, the Company filed its motion to vacate the arbitrator's award in the same Court. In February 2006, the Judge granted Symbol's motion to enter a judgment affirming the arbitrator's award for past royalties. On March 13, 2006, the Company paid $14.9 million reflecting royalties and interest due in accordance with the judgment of which $14.4 million was accrued for at December 31, 2005, and recorded a charge of $0.5 million for interest due through the payment date. With a payment due on approximately August 15, 2006, any significant royalty obligations for these products will end. On September 23, 2005, Symbol filed suit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging patent infringement. Symbol filed a related case before the International Trade Commission ("ITC") also alleging patent infringement of the same patents. A notice of the investigation instituted by the ITC was served on the Company on October 24, 2005. The case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has been stayed pending the outcome of the matter before the ITC. Trial before the ITC commenced on July 24, 2006 and concluded on August 1, 2006. The parties will submit post trial briefs, after which time the matter will be ready for determination initially by the Administrative Law Judge. Metrologic stands firm, in its belief, that its products do not infringe Symbol's patents. In this regard, by order dated April 17, 2006, the Administrative Law Judge found one of Symbol's patents to be invalid. Metrologic is vigorously defending the remaining allegations of patent infringement. On November 4, 2005, Symbol filed another suit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging patent infringement. The complaint has been served on and answered by the Company. Discovery has just begun in this matter. We plan a vigorous defense. Metrologic v. Symbol Technologies, Inc. On June 18, 2003, the Company filed suit against Symbol in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging claims of patent infringement of certain of our patents by at least two Symbol products. The complaint also contains a claim for breach of the Symbol Agreement between the parties. Symbol's answer to the complaint, filed on July 30, 2003, included counterclaims requesting that a declaratory judgment be entered that the patents in suit are invalid, are not infringed by Symbol and that Symbol is not in breach of the Symbol Agreement. The Court heard arguments on the construction of the claims in the patents in suit in March 2006 and a trial is currently scheduled for November 2006. On May 17, 2005, the Company filed suit against Symbol in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey for breach of contract for failure to pay royalties in accordance with the terms of the Symbol Agreement. In September 2005, the parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. On May 1, 2006, Symbol's motion for summary judgment was denied. Then, on June 27, 2006, our motion for summary judgment was granted. An agreed to form of order calling for the payment to us of $2.65 million was submitted to the Court on July 24, 2006. As of June 30, 2006, the Company has approximately $0.8 million of royalty receivables reflected in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet related to this matter. The Company will not record a gain related to the remaining amount in its Consolidated Statement of Operations until the decision is finalized and all appeal rights are exhausted by Symbol. On May 8, 2006, the Company filed a Complaint against Symbol in the U.S. District Court for New Jersey. This new Complaint asserts infringement by Symbol of several Metrologic patents and seeks declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief. More specifically, we assert that several of Symbol's mobile computers infringe our mobile computing patent portfolio. Symbol has filed an answer and counterclaim asserting, among other things, that it is licensed to use our patents and that the patents are invalid. Discovery in this matter has just begun. Brazil Our subsidiary in Brazil has received notices from the local taxing authorities disputing the amount of import taxes and duties paid on imported products prior to December 2002. We have filed appeals of their assessments in the administrative courts and are awaiting decisions on our appeals. We have accrued a liability for these claims based on what we believe to be the most likely outcome of these appeals and other potential administrative processes. If we are unsuccessful in our appeals and other administrative processes, the actual liability could be approximately $1.1 million higher than the amount we have accrued as of June 30, 2006. Janet Norton v. Metrologic Instruments, Inc. On May 1, 2006, the Company received a Complaint filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey which asserts an employment based claim by a current employee. Our investigation to date demonstrates that this claim has no merit. The plaintiff has filed an amended complaint and we will shortly be filing an answer. PSC Scanning v. Metrologic Instruments, Inc. On May 10, 2006, PSC Scanning ("PSC") filed an action against the Company in the U.S. District Court in Oregon. In its complaint, PSC asserted that our Stratos line of bi-optic scanners infringe two new patents issued on December 13, 2005 and January 31, 2006. We have filed an answer and counterclaim and intend to vigorously defend this matter. Additionally, complying with the terms of the settlement agreement effective March 16, 2005, we have notified PSC that two lines of their products infringe our patents. Regarding our claims, we are currently in a 90 day standstill period where the parties are required to meet and confer to see if the matter can be resolved. We are not aware of any other legal claim or action against us, which could be expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Forward Looking Statements; Certain Cautionary Language Written and oral statements provided by us from time to time may contain certain forward looking information, as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act") and in releases made by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). This report contains forward-looking statements which may be identified by their use of words like "plans," "expects," "will," "anticipates," "intends," "projects," "estimates" or other words of similar meaning. All statements that address expectations or projections about the future, including statements about the company's strategy for growth, product development, market position, expenditures, and financial results, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and expectations of future events. The Company cannot guarantee that these assumptions and expectations are accurate or will be realized. See the Risk Factors discussion set forth under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 for a description of risk factors that could significantly affect the Company's financial results. General The following discussion of our results of operations and liquidity and capital resources should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. The Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are unaudited. Metrologic Instruments, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, "we", "us", "our" or the "Company") are experts in optical image capture and processing solutions. We utilize our expertise to design, manufacture and market sophisticated imaging and scanning solutions serving a variety of point-of-sale, commercial and industrial applications. Our solutions utilize a broad array of laser, holographic and vision-based technologies designed to provide superior functionality and a compelling value proposition for our customers. Critical Accounting Policies In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, the Company's management must make decisions which impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures. Such decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and assumptions on which to base estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to allowances for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, legal contingencies, stock-based compensation, and income taxes. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Other than the Company's compliance with the new accounting requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123(R), "Share Based Payments" ("SFAS 123(R)"), there have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies listed and described in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of the Company's 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Stock-Based Compensation. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method, in which compensation cost is recognized for (a) all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123(R) that remain unvested as of the effective date. Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R), the Company recognizes share-based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and only recognizes compensation cost for those shares expected to vest. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the share-based payment awards and stock price volatility. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management's best estimates, and these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, should factors and assumptions change, such as volatility, the expected life, and forfeiture rates, the share-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. Executive Overview We are experts in optical image capture and processing solutions. In recent years, we have increased sales, cash flow from operations and net income primarily through the introduction of new products, penetration into new markets and a focus on cost reduction activities to maintain a competitive advantage. Success factors critical to our business include sales growth through continued penetration within our existing markets through new product introductions and expanded sales efforts, entering into new markets, maintaining a highly responsive and cost efficient infrastructure, achieving the financial flexibility to ensure that we can respond to new market opportunities in order to return value to our shareholders and selectively pursuing strategic acquisitions. In order to continue our penetration into new and existing markets, our strategy involves expanding our sales channels and expanding our product development activities. We have concentrated our direct sales efforts to further penetrate some of the largest retailers in the United States as well as focusing on the adoption of bar coding technology in the healthcare industry. During fiscal 2005 and the first half of 2006, we continued to see increased orders with key retail accounts which contributed to our quarter over quarter sales growth. Another key factor in achieving this sales growth is expanding our geographic reach by capitalizing on our presence throughout Asia and emerging markets in Central and Eastern Europe. We believe these geographic areas will continue to be an opportunity for continued growth, as evidenced by our investment in the expansion of our Suzhou, China manufacturing facility which was completed in 2004, as well as the opening of new sales offices in these territories. Our plans are to open additional offices in the Asia/Pacific region as we continue to implement and build upon our "globally local" philosophy. In addition, we continue to invest in developing new and improved products to meet the changing needs of our existing customers. We are continuing to focus on executing our core strategy of leveraging our engineering expertise to produce new bar code scanners and industrial automation products that will allow us to penetrate new markets that we have not previously served and gain market share in our existing markets. Furthermore, we introduced five new products in 2005 and currently have additional new products in the pipeline. We continue to believe sales for 2006 and beyond will be positively affected as these new products either begin to ship or ship in larger quantities. To maintain a highly responsive and cost efficient infrastructure, our focus is to maximize the efficiency of our organization through process improvements and cost containment. We continue to focus on our strategy for margin expansion through specific engineering initiatives to reduce product and manufacturing costs and believe that fiscal 2006 will benefit from these specific initiatives. We also intend to further expand our manufacturing capabilities at our Suzhou, China facility in future years to continue to take advantage of these cost efficiencies. Closely linked to the success factors discussed above is our continued focus to maintain financial flexibility. As of June 30, 2006, we had total debt of approximately $16.6 million. Furthermore, we had cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of approximately $65.7 million as of June 30, 2006. We believe that our current cash and working capital positions and expected operating cash flows will be sufficient to fund our working capital, planned capital expenditures and debt repayment requirements for the foreseeable future. In addition to our internal development and organic growth, we may selectively pursue strategic acquisitions that we believe will broaden or complement our current technology base and allow us to serve additional end users and the evolving needs of our existing customers. In an effort to expand our market presence in RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) as part of our planned growth strategy, on May 5, 2006, the Company acquired of all of the assets of Visible-RF, LLC, a privately held company located in Needham, MA. The acquisition of Visible-RF, LLC represents a significant addition to the Company's technology portfolio. This technology combines the benefits of a paper label with the advantages of RFID to display visible information that is updated via a wireless signal. The Company intends to utilize its extensive worldwide sales and distribution network to expand this new technology through its existing customer base. In addition, Metrologic entered into a strategic partnership with MaxID during March 2006 which has resulted in two recently introduced RFID readers for the North American Market. Adding this RFID technology enables us to serve customers in the supply chain and transportation/logistics markets and will help redefine our Industrial Business strategy. Results of Operations In addition to including results of operations under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, we disclose results of operations data for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 excluding the effects of stock-based compensation. For internal management analysis, we compare current operating expenses to periods prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on a "with" and "without" basis to determine the trend of operating expenses. The reconciliation below shows the effects on the quarterly results if we had not adopted SFAS No. 123(R). This non-GAAP financial data is included with the intention of providing investors a more complete understanding of our results of operations and trends as compared with prior period results, but should only be used in conjunction with results reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Information Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 June 30, 2006 ($ in Thousands) ($ in Thousands) ----------------------------- -------------------------- Actual Actual Actual Effect Before Actual Effect Before As of SFAS SFAS As of SFAS SFAS Reported 123R 123R Reported 123R 123R ---------------------------- -------------------------- Sales $62,551 $ - $62,551 $122,786 $ - $122,786 Cost of sales 37,337 217 37,120 73,746 538 73,208 ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- Gross profit 25,214 (217) 25,431 49,040 (538) 49,578 Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative expenses 16,032 662 15,370 30,819 1,593 29,226 Research and development expenses 2,763 218 2,545 5,249 510 4,739 ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- Total operating expenses 18,795 880 17,915 36,068 2,103 33,965 Operating income 6,419 (1,097) 7,516 12,972 (2,641) 15,613 Other income 472 - 472 731 - 731 ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- Income before income taxes 6,891 (1,097) 7,988 13,703 (2,641) 16,344 Income tax expense (benefit) 2,481 (395) 2,876 4,933 (951) 5,884 ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- Net income $ 4,410 $ (702) $ 5,112 $ 8,770 $(1,690) $ 10,460 ======= ======= ======= ======== ======= ======== Earnings per share: Basic $ 0.19 $ (0.04) $ 0.23 $ 0.39 $ (0.07) $ 0.46 Diluted $ 0.19 $ (0.03) $ 0.22 $ 0.38 $ (0.07) $ 0.45 The following table sets forth certain of our consolidated statement of operations data as a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, --------------------------- --------------------------- 2006 2006 2005 2006 2006 2005 As Excluding As As Excluding As Reported SFAS 123R Reported Reported SFAS 123R Reported --------------------------- --------------------------- Sales 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Cost of sales 59.7% 59.3% 55.6% 60.1% 59.6% 56.3% Gross profit 40.3% 40.7% 44.4% 39.9% 40.4% 43.7% Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative expenses 25.6% 24.6% 25.0% 25.1% 23.8% 24.7% Research and development expenses 4.4% 4.1% 4.6% 4.3% 3.9% 4.4% Total operating expenses 30.0% 28.7% 29.6% 29.4% 27.7% 29.1% Operating income 10.3% 12.0% 14.8% 10.5% 12.7% 14.6% Other income (expenses), net 0.8% 0.8% 0.2% 0.6% 0.6% (0.6%) Income before income taxes 11.1% 12.8% 15.0% 11.1% 13.3% 14.0% Provision for income taxes 4.0% 4.6% 5.4% 4.0% 4.8% 5.0% Net income 7.1% 8.2% 9.6% 7.1% 8.5% 9.0% Our business is divided into two major segments: Data Capture & Collection and Industrial Automation and Optical Systems. Bar code scanners are typically either handheld scanners or fixed projection scanners. Handheld bar code scanners are principally suited for retail point-of-sale, document processing, library, healthcare and inventory applications. Fixed projection scanners, which can be mounted on or in a counter, are principally suited for supermarkets, convenience stores, mass merchandisers, health clubs and specialty retailers. Industrial automation products are comprised of fixed position systems that are either laser- or vision-based. These systems range from simple, one-scanner solutions to complex, integrated systems incorporating multi-scanner, image capture and dimensioning technologies. Optical Systems are comprised of advanced electro-optical systems including wavefront sensors, adaptive optics systems and custom instrumentation. The following table sets forth certain information regarding our revenues by our two business segments for the periods indicated. Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2006 2005 2006 2005 --------- -------- -------- -------- ($ in Thousands) ($ in Thousands) Data Capture & Collection $ 51,059 $ 39,128 $101,329 $ 75,656 Industrial Automation/Optical Systems Industrial Automation 2,639 3,461 5,122 8,015 Optical Systems 8,853 6,015 16,335 11,784 --------- -------- -------- -------- Total Industrial Automation/ Optical Systems 11,492 9,476 21,457 19,799 --------- -------- -------- -------- Total Company $ 62,551 $ 48,604 $122,786 $ 95,455 ========= ======== ======== ======== Most of our product sales in Western Europe, Brazil and Asia are billed in foreign currencies and are subject to currency exchange rate fluctuations. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, sales and gross profit were negatively affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to certain foreign currencies, especially the euro, when compared to the comparable period in 2005. The following table sets forth certain information as to our sales by geographic location: ------------------------------ ------------------------------- Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2006 % 2005 % 2006 % 2005 % ------------------------------ ------------------------------- ($ in Thousands) The Americas(1) $25,596 40.9% $23,149 47.6% $ 53,541 43.6% $45,766 47.9% EMEA (2) 29,713 47.5% 19,387 39.9% 56,825 46.3% 38,253 40.1% Asia/Pacific 7,242 11.6% 6,068 12.5% 12,420 10.1% 11,436 12.0% ------- ------ ------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------ Total $62,551 100.0% $48,604 100.0% $122,786 100.0% $95,455 100.0% ======= ====== ======= ====== ======== ====== ======= ====== (1) The Americas is defined as North America, South America, Canada and Mexico (2) EMEA is defined as Europe, Middle East and Africa Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 Sales increased 28.7% to $62.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $48.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. Sales of our data capture and collection products increased by 30.5%, sales of industrial automation products decreased by 23.8% and sales of optical systems increased by 47.2%. The Euro exchange rate did not have a material impact on data capture and collection sales. Data capture and collection sales increased approximately $15.0 million due to increased unit sales of handheld and in-counter scanners, including new product offerings. These factors were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $3.2 million resulting from lower average selling prices and increased promotional programs due to competitive pricing pressures experienced in the retail sector in all geographic regions. Our Industrial Automation business has exhibited a greater degree of volatility than our data capture and collection business due to the timing and size of related contracts in this business. The decrease in the industrial automation product sales is attributable to the completion of certain fixed price and other contracts during or prior to the second quarter of 2006. The increase in optical systems sales in the second quarter of 2006 reflects an increase in ongoing and new customer funded research and development and production type programs. Sales to "The Americas" region increased $2.4 million, or 10.6%, in the three months ended June 30, 2006 when compared to the comparable period in 2005. This increase is primarily attributed to ongoing penetration into new vertical markets and Tier 1 retailers, higher demand in our South America markets, and continued growth with our key distributors. EMEA sales increased $10.3 million, or 53.3% in the three months ended June 30, 2006 when compared to the same period a year ago. The increase in EMEA sales is attributable to increased unit volume offset by lower average selling prices. The increased unit volume, in part, reflects penetration into Tier 1 retailers as well as increased sales of certain of our products utilized in reverse-vending applications attributable to legislative mandates. Asia/Pacific sales increased $1.2 million, or 19.3% in the three months ended June 30, 2006 when compared with the comparable period in 2005. We continue to experience growth in this region as a result of continued penetration into both new and existing key markets. No individual customer accounted for 10.0% or more of sales in the three months ended June 30, 2006 or 2005. Cost of sales increased to $37.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $27.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. As a percentage of sales, cost of sales increased to 59.7% in 2006 from 55.6% in 2005. The increase in the percentage of cost of sales can be primarily attributed to the following key factors: o Competitive pricing on direct sales to Tier 1 retailers in the United States and EMEA. o Less favorable product mix within our data capture and collection business segment resulting from increased sales of our new product offerings that have lower margins and have not yet been fully cost reduced as well as certain non-Metrologic products. o Increased royalty costs as a result of the court decision upholding the arbitration award that we are required to pay royalty payments of $10 per unit on sales of certain of our scanners. o Increased warranty costs for certain product redesign initiatives and quality issues identified for select products. o Increased compensation costs as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses increased 32.1% to $16.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $12.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. As a percentage of sales, SG&A expenses increased from 25.0% of sales in the three months ended June 30, 2005 to 25.6% of sales in the corresponding period in 2006. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily attributable to increased legal fees associated with ongoing litigation matters, stock-based compensation expense resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and increased variable selling expenses associated with the higher sales volume than the comparable period in 2005. Excluding the effects of SFAS No. 123(R), SG&A expenses would have been $15.4 million or 24.6% of sales. Research and development ("R&D") expenses increased 24.6% to $2.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006 from $2.2 million in the corresponding period in 2005; however, as a percent of sales, R&D expenses decreased to 4.4% of sales from 4.6% of sales. The decrease in R&D expenses as a percent of sales can be attributed to higher sales volume in 2006. The relative increase is primarily due to stock-based compensation expense resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and an increase in personnel and professional fee costs associated with ongoing product development initiatives. Excluding the effects of SFAS No. 123(R), R&D expenses would have been $2.5 million or 4.1% of sales. Net interest income of $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 increased $0.3 million as compared with net interest income of $0.1 million for the comparable period in 2005. The increase can be attributed to higher invested cash balances and higher interest yields on investment earnings in 2006 than in the comparable period in 2005 and a reduction of interest expense as a result of the payoff on acquisition related notes during the first quarter of 2006. Other income/expense reflects net other income of $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared with net other expense of $0.05 million for the comparable period in 2005. The change can be attributed to higher foreign exchange losses in 2005 when compared with exchange gains in the comparable period in 2006 as a result of volatility in foreign exchange rates, primarily the Euro, Brazilian real and the Singapore dollar. Net income was $4.4 million, or $0.19 per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared with net income of $4.7 million or $0.20 per diluted share in 2005. Net income reflects a 36% effective tax rate for both 2006 and 2005. The effective rate for 2006 does not reflect any benefit for research and development tax credits as the federal legislation authorizing such credits expired on December 31, 2005, and has not yet been renewed. Excluding the effects of SFAS No. 123(R), net income would have been $5.1 million, or $0.22 per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Sales increased 28.6% to $122.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $95.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. Sales of our data capture and collection products increased by 33.9%, sales of industrial automation products decreased by 36.1% and sales of optical systems increased by 38.6%. Data capture and collection sales increased approximately $30.8 million due to increased unit sales of handheld and in-counter scanners, including new product offerings. This was offset by a weakening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar which accounted for a decrease of approximately $2.3 million, as well as a decrease of approximately $2.8 million resulting from lower average selling prices and increased promotional programs due to competitive pricing pressures experienced in the retail sector in all geographic regions. Our Industrial Automation business has exhibited a greater degree of volatility than our data capture and collection business due to the timing and size of related contracts in this business. The decrease in the industrial automation product sales is attributable to the completion of certain fixed price and other contracts during or prior to the second quarter of 2006 and smaller contributions from our Omniplanar business. The increase in optical systems sales in 2006 reflects an increase in ongoing and new customer funded research and development and production type programs and the execution of contract backlog accumulated over the recent quarters. Sales to "The Americas" region increased $7.8 million, or 17.0%, in 2006 when compared to the comparable period in 2005. This increase is primarily attributed to ongoing penetration into new vertical markets and Tier 1 retailers, higher demand in our South America markets, and continued growth with our key distributors. EMEA sales increased $18.6 million, or 48.6% in 2006 when compared to the same period a year ago. The increase in EMEA sales is attributable to increased unit volume offset by lower average selling prices and the weakening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar. The increased unit volume, in part, reflects penetration into Tier 1 retailers as well as increased sales of certain of our products utilized in reverse-vending applications attributable to legislative mandates. Asia/Pacific sales increased $1.0 million, or 8.6% in 2006 when compared with the comparable period in 2005. We continue to experience growth in this region as a result of continued penetration into both new and existing key markets. No individual customer accounted for 10.0% or more of sales in the six months ended June 30, 2006 or 2005. Cost of sales increased to $73.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $53.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. As a percentage of sales, cost of sales increased to 60.1% in 2006 from 56.3% in 2005. The increase in the percentage of cost of sales can be primarily attributed to the following key factors: o Competitive pricing on direct sales to Tier 1 retailers in the United States and EMEA. o Less favorable product mix within our data capture and collection business segment resulting from increased sales of our new product offerings that have lower margins and have not yet been fully cost reduced as well as certain non-Metrologic products. o Increased royalty costs as a result of the court decision upholding the arbitration award that we are required to pay royalty payments of $10 per unit on sales of certain of our scanners. o Increased scrap, warranty and obsolescence reserves for certain product redesign initiatives and quality issues identified for select products. o Increased compensation costs as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses increased 31.0% to $30.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $23.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. As a percentage of sales, SG&A expenses increased from 24.7% of sales in the six months ended June 30, 2005 to 25.1% of sales in the corresponding period in 2006. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily attributable to increased legal fees associated with ongoing litigation matters, stock-based compensation expense resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and increased variable selling expenses associated with the higher sales volume than the comparable period in 2005. Excluding the effects of SFAS No. 123(R), SG&A expenses would have been $29.2 million or 23.8% of sales. R&D expenses increased 25.9% to $5.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $4.2 million in the corresponding period in 2005; however, as a percent of sales, R&D expenses decreased slightly to 4.3% of sales from 4.4% of sales. The decrease in R&D expenses as a percent of sales can be attributed to higher sales volume in 2006. The relative increase is primarily due to stock-based compensation expense resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and an increase in personnel and professional fee costs associated with ongoing product development initiatives. Excluding the effects of SFAS No. 123(R), R&D expenses would have been $4.7 million or 3.9% of sales. Net interest income of $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased $0.1 million as compared with net interest income of $0.1 million for the comparable period in 2005. The increase can be attributed to higher invested cash balances and higher interest yields on investment earnings in 2006 than in the comparable period in 2005, offset by higher interest expense as a result of the charge of $0.5 million in interest on the Symbol litigation settlement recorded in the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Other income/expense reflects net other income of $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with net other expense of $0.7 million for the comparable period in 2005. The change can be attributed to higher foreign exchange losses in 2005 when compared with exchange gains in the comparable period in 2006 as a result of volatility in foreign exchange rates, primarily the Euro, Brazilian real and the Singapore dollar. Net income was $8.8 million, or $0.38 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with net income of $8.6 million or $0.37 per diluted share in 2005. Net income reflects a 36% effective tax rate for both 2006 and 2005. The effective rate for 2006 does not reflect any benefit for research and development tax credits as the federal legislation authorizing such credits expired on December 31, 2005, and has not yet been renewed. Excluding the effects of SFAS No. 123(R), net income would have been $10.5 million, or $0.45 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Inflation and Seasonality Inflation and seasonality have not had a material impact on our results of operations. However, our sales are typically impacted by fluctuation decreases in seasonal demand from European customers in our third quarter. In addition, our first quarter is also impacted by factors, such as: (i) the establishment of new budgets, (ii) the expiration of legislative calendar-year programs and (iii) start-up investment of pilot efforts. Liquidity and Capital Resources Operating activities Net cash used in operations was $4.6 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006 as compared to cash provided by operations of $7.1 million for the comparable period in 2005. Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 can be attributed primarily to payment of the Symbol litigation award of $14.9 million, net increases in operating assets and liabilities of $4.7 million; offset by net income of $8.8 million, depreciation and amortization of approximately $3.6 million and stock-based compensation expense of $2.6 million. Our working capital increased $20.4 million or 22.1% to $112.7 million as of June 30, 2006 from $92.3 million as of December 31, 2005. The key components of the increase in working capital were increases in inventory of $6.3 million and an increase in accounts receivable of $1.1 million as a result of sales concentrations at the end of the quarter, increases in marketable securities of $1.1 million and net decreases in other current assets/liabilities of $11.9 million. Investing activities Cash used in investing activities was $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to $7.0 million for the comparable period in 2005. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is primarily due to changes in the purchases, sales and maturities of marketable securities of $2.2 million plus the scheduled purchase of the remaining 49% interest in Metrologic Eria Iberica in the first half of 2005 for $1.2 million, offset by increases in patents and trademarks of $0.8 million as a result of the acquisition of Visible-RF, LLC (See Note 9-"Acquisitions" for additional information) and increased spending for capital expenditures of $0.2 million. Financing activities Cash provided by financing activities was $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to $4.5 million for the comparable period in 2005. Cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 consists primarily of $3.5 million of proceeds and related tax benefits from the exercise of stock options and purchases under the employee stock purchase plan offset by repayments of scheduled notes of $2.4 million (See "Outstanding debt and financing arrangements" below for additional information on scheduled notes) and repayments under lines of credit by our foreign subsidiaries of $0.5 million. Outstanding debt and financing arrangements In connection with the acquisition of Omniplanar, the Purchase Agreement set forth a schedule of payments over 18 months. We paid $9.0 million at closing, $2.0 million in 2005 and the final payment of $2.0 million in March 2006. On September 1, 2005 the Company entered into a Cross-License Agreement with Intermec IP Corp., a division of Intermec Inc., which includes a license origination fee of $0.8 million. The Company paid $0.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2005, $0.2 million for the period ended March 31, 2006, and the remaining scheduled payments of $0.2 million in June 2006. Some of our European subsidiaries have entered into working capital and invoice discounting agreements with HypoVereinsbank, Dresdner, Societe Generale and GE Commercial Finance. Outstanding borrowings under the working capital agreement with HypoVereinsbank have been guaranteed by Metrologic Instruments, Inc., the parent company. These agreements provide the Company with availability of up to $21.1 million, using June 30, 2006 exchange rates, at interest rates ranging from 4.0% to 6.5%. In addition, our subsidiary Metrologic do Brasil has a working capital agreement with Banco Bradesco SA with availability of up to 0.8 million real or $0.4 million, using June 30, 2006 exchange rates. At June 30, 2006, $16.6 million was outstanding under such agreements and accordingly is included in lines of credit in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We believe that our current cash and working capital positions and expected operating cash flows will be sufficient to fund our working capital, planned capital expenditures and debt repayment requirements for the foreseeable future. Foreign Currency Exchange Our liquidity has been, and may continue to be, affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro, the Brazilian real, the Singapore dollar, and the Chinese renminbi. In an effort to mitigate the financial implications of the volatility in the exchange rate between the Euro and the U.S. dollar, we have in the past entered and may selectively enter into derivative financial instruments to offset our exposure to foreign currency risks. Derivative financial instruments may include (i) foreign currency forward exchange contracts with our primary bank for periods not exceeding six months, which partially hedge sales to our German subsidiary and (ii) Euro-based loans, which act as a partial hedge against outstanding intercompany receivables and the net assets of our European subsidiary, which are denominated in Euros. Additionally, our European subsidiary invoices and receives payment in certain other major currencies, including the British pound, which results in an additional mitigating measure that reduces our exposure to the fluctuation between the Euro and the U.S. dollar, although it does not offer protection against fluctuations of that currency against the U.S. Dollar. No derivative instruments were outstanding at June 30, 2006. Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 151, "Inventory Costs, An amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4" ("SFAS No. 151"). SFAS 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, "Inventory Pricing," to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that such items be recognized as current-period charges, regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal" as stated in ARB 43. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or liquidity. In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123(R)"), which replaces SFAS 123 and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the Modified Prospective Approach. See Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail regarding the adoption of this statement. In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments-An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140" ("SFAS No. 155"). SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation to be accounted for as a whole on a fair value basis, at the holders' election. SFAS No. 155 also clarifies and amends certain other provisions of SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140. This statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or liquidity. In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 156, "Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets-An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 140" ("SFAS No. 156"). SFAS No. 156 provides guidance on the accounting for servicing assets and liabilities when an entity undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract. This statement is effective for all transactions in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 156 will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or liquidity. In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 clarifies the way companies are to account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements and prescribes a consistent recognition threshold and measurement attribute for recognizing, derecognizing, and measuring the tax benefits of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, on a tax return. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, although early adoption is permitted. The Company does not plan to adopt early and is currently in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of the Interpretation will have on the Company's consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or liquidity. Item 3- Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk There have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk since December 31, 2005. Item 4- Controls and Procedures As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Based on that evaluation these officers concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. There have been no changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings We protect our technological position and new product development with domestic and foreign patents. When we believe competitors are infringing on these patents, we may pursue claims or other legal action against these parties. Additionally, from time-to-time, we receive legal challenges to the validity of our patents or allegations that our products infringe the patents of others. We are currently involved in matters of litigation arising in the normal course of business including the matters described below. We believe that such litigation either individually or in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, except as noted below. Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Metrologic In August 2005, the arbitrator entered a final ruling in the arbitration awarding Symbol Technologies, Inc. ("Symbol") past royalties on certain of the Company's products plus interest. Symbol then filed a motion to enter the judgment with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In response, the Company filed its motion to vacate the arbitrator's award in the same Court. In February 2006, the Judge granted Symbol's motion to enter a judgment affirming the arbitrator's award for past royalties. On March 13, 2006, the Company paid $14.9 million reflecting royalties and interest due in accordance with the judgment of which $14.4 million was accrued for at December 31, 2005, and recorded a charge of $0.5 million for interest due through the payment date. With a payment due on approximately August 15, 2006, any significant royalty obligations for these products will end. On September 23, 2005, Symbol filed suit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging patent infringement. Symbol filed a related case before the International Trade Commission ("ITC") also alleging patent infringement of the same patents. A notice of the investigation instituted by the ITC was served on the Company on October 24, 2005. The case in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has been stayed pending the outcome of the matter before the ITC. Trial before the ITC commenced on July 24, 2006 and concluded on August 1, 2006. The parties will submit post trial briefs, after which time the matter will be ready for determination initially by the Administrative Law Judge. Metrologic stands firm, in its belief, that its products do not infringe Symbol's patents. In this regard, by order dated April 17, 2006, the Administrative Law Judge found one of Symbol's patents to be invalid. Metrologic is vigorously defending the remaining allegations of patent infringement. On November 4, 2005, Symbol filed another suit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging patent infringement. The complaint has been served on and answered by the Company. Discovery has just begun in this matter. We plan a vigorous defense. Metrologic v. Symbol Technologies, Inc. On May 17, 2005, the Company filed suit against Symbol in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey for breach of contract for failure to pay royalties in accordance with the terms of the Symbol Agreement. In September 2005, the parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. On May 1, 2006, Symbol's motion for summary judgment was denied. Then, on June 27, 2006, our motion for summary judgment was granted. An agreed to form of order calling for the payment to us of $2.65 million was submitted to the Court on July 24, 2006. As of June 30, 2006, the Company has approximately $0.8 million of royalty receivables reflected in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet related to this matter. The Company will not record a gain related to the remaining amount in its Consolidated Statement of Operations until the decision is finalized and all appeal rights are exhausted by Symbol. On May 8, 2006, the Company filed a Complaint against Symbol in the U. S. District Court for New Jersey. This new Complaint asserts infringement by Symbol of several Metrologic patents and seeks declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief. More specifically, we assert that several of Symbol's mobile computers infringe our mobile computing patent portfolio. Symbol has filed an answer and counterclaim asserting, among other things, that it is licensed to use our patents and that the patents are invalid. Discovery in this matter has just begun. Brazil Our subsidiary in Brazil has received notices from the local taxing authorities disputing the amount of import taxes and duties paid on imported products prior to December 2002. We have filed appeals of their assessments in the administrative courts and are awaiting decisions on our appeals. We have accrued a liability for these claims based on what we believe to be the most likely outcome of these appeals and other potential administrative processes. If we are unsuccessful in our appeals and other administrative processes, the actual liability could be approximately $1.1 million higher than the amount we have accrued as of June 30, 2006. Janet Norton v. Metrologic Instruments, Inc. On May 1, 2006, the Company received a Complaint filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey which asserts an employment based claim by a current employee. Our investigation to date demonstrates that this claim has no merit. The plaintiff has filed an amended complaint and we will shortly be filing an answer. PSC Scanning v. Metrologic Instruments, Inc. On May 10, 2006, PSC Scanning ("PSC") filed an action against the Company in the U. S. District Court in Oregon. In its complaint, PSC asserted that our Stratos line of bi-optic scanners infringe two new patents issued on December 13, 2005 and January 31, 2006. We have filed an answer and counterclaim and intend to vigorously defend this matter. Additionally, complying with the terms of the settlement agreement effective March 16, 2005, we have notified PSC that two lines of their products infringe our patents. Regarding our claims, we are currently in a 90 day standstill period where the parties are required to meet and confer to see if the matter can be resolved. We are not aware of any other legal claim or action against us, which could be expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Item 1A. Risk Factors There have been no material changes to the risk factors faced by the Company since December 31, 2005. For identification and discussion of the most significant risks applicable to the Company and its business, please refer to the Risk Factors section in Item 1A of our 2005 Form 10-K. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Our Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on June 15, 2006. At such meeting, the following matters were voted upon by the shareholders, receiving the number of affirmative, negative and withheld votes, as well as abstentions and broker non-votes, set forth below for each matter. (1) The vote of the common shareholders for the election of C. Harry Knowles and Stanton L. Meltzer as directors to serve a three-year term ending in 2009 were as follows: Number of Votes Number of Votes Number of Votes For Against Abstain Name ------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- 17,550,848 0 3,863,443 C. Harry Knowles 21,036,537 0 377,754 Stanton Meltzer (2) The vote of the common shareholders for the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 was as follows: Number of Votes Number of Votes Number of Votes For Against Abstain Broker Non-Votes ------------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- 21,362,906 43,831 7,554 0 The directors whose terms continue after the Annual Meeting of Shareholders referenced above are Richard C. Close, Janet Knowles, John Mathias, Hsu Jau Nan and William Rulon-Miller. Item 6. Exhibits Exhibits: 31.1 Certification by Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 executed by the Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company. 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 executed by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. Date: August 9, 2006 By:/s/ C. Harry Knowles ----------------- ---------------------------------------- C. Harry Knowles Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer (Interim Principal Executive Officer) Date: August 9, 2006 By:/s/ Kevin J. Bratton ----------------- ----------------------------------------- Kevin J. Bratton Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Exhibit Index Page Number 31.1 Certification by Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 33 31.2 Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 34 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 executed by the Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company. 35 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 executed by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. 36 Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, C. Harry Knowles, Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer of Metrologic Instruments, Inc., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Metrologic Instruments, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. By: /s/C. Harry Knowles ---------------------------------- Name: C. Harry Knowles Title: Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer Date: August 9, 2006 Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, Kevin J. Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of Metrologic Instruments, Inc., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Metrologic Instruments, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. By: /s/Kevin J. Bratton ---------------------------------- Name: Kevin J. Bratton Title: Chief Financial Officer Date: August 9, 2006 EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Report of Metrologic Instruments, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, C. Harry Knowles, Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/C. Harry Knowles - ------------------------------------ C. Harry Knowles Chairman of the Board and Interim Chief Executive Officer August 9, 2006 EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Report of Metrologic Instruments, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin J. Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/Kevin J. Bratton - ------------------------------------ Kevin J. Bratton Chief Financial Officer August 9, 2006 -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----