XML 97 R27.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Marketable Securities and Fair Value Measurements (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Marketable Securities by Balance Sheet Classification

The Company’s marketable securities at March 31, 2015 and 2014 are classified on the balance sheet as follows (in thousands):

 

     March 31,  
     2015      2014  
     (in $000’s)  

Short-term marketable securities (within one year to maturity)

   $ 109,557       $ 55,663   

Long-term marketable securities (one to five years to maturity)

     13,996         41,761   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 123,553       $ 97,424   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
Marketable Securities

The Company’s marketable securities at March 31, 2015 and 2014 are invested in the following (in thousands):

 

     Amortized
Cost
     Gross
Unrealized
Gains
     Gross
Unrealized
Losses
     Fair
Market
Value
 
     (in $000’s)  

At March 31, 2015:

           

US Treasury mutual fund securities

   $ 19,487       $ —         $ —         $ 19,487   

Short-term government-backed securities

     90,070         9         (9      90,070   

Long-term government-backed securities

     13,999         2         (5      13,996   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 123,556       $ 11       $ (14    $ 123,553   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     Amortized
Cost
     Gross
Unrealized
Gains
     Gross
Unrealized
Losses
     Fair
Market
Value
 
     (in $000’s)  

At March 31, 2014:

           

US Treasury mutual fund securities

   $ 31,487       $ —         $ —         $ 31,487   

Short-term government-backed securities

     24,174         6         (4      24,176   

Long-term government-backed securities

     41,779         8         (26      41,761   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 97,440       $ 14       $ (30    $ 97,424   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value

The following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial instruments measured at fair value as of March 31, 2015 and 2014:

 

     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  
     (in $000’s)  

At March 31, 2015:

           

Assets

           

U.S. Treasury mutual fund securities

   $ —         $ 19,487       $ —         $ 19,487   

Short-term government-backed securities

     —           90,070         —           90,070   

Long-term government-backed securities

     —           13,996         —           13,996   

Liabilities

           

Contingent consideration

     —           —           6,510         6,510   
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  
     (in$000’s)  

At March 31, 2014:

           

U.S. Treasury mutual fund securities

   $ —         $ 31,487       $ —         $ 31,487   

Short-term government-backed securities

     —           24,176         —           24,176   

Long-term government-backed securities

     —           41,761         —           41,761   
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration as Determined by Level 3 Inputs

The following table summarizes the change in fair value, as determined by Level 3 inputs, of the contingent consideration for the year ended March 31, 2015:

 

     March 31,
2015
 
     (in $000’s)  

Beginning balance

   $ —     

Additions

     6,000   

Payments

     —     

Change in fair value

     510   
  

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 6,510   
  

 

 

 
Quantitative Information about Inputs and Valuation Methodologies Used for Fair Value Measurements Classified in Level 3

The following table presents quantitative information about the inputs and valuation methodologies used for the Company’s fair value measurements as of July 1, 2014 and March 31, 2015 classified in Level 3:

 

    Valuation Methodology   Significant Unobservable Input   Weighted Average
(range, if
applicable)

Contingent consideration

  Probability weighted income
approach
  Milestone dates
  2018 to 2021
    Discount rate   8% to 12%
    Probability of occurrence   Probability adjusted level
of 40% for the base case
scenario and 5% to 25% for
various upside and downside
scenarios