10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

xQUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 000-28831

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Florida	84-1047159
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

350 Jim Moran Boulevard, Suite 120, Deerfield Beach, Florida    33442

(Address of principal executive offices)

(954) 252-3440

(Issuer’s Telephone Number)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. xYes oNo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated file, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  oYes  xNo

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practical date.  As of June 30, 2013, there were 657,760,532 shares of the issuer's $.0001 par value common stock issued and outstanding.

1

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Formerly CHDT Corporation)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
	(Unaudited)
	June 30th,			December 31,
	2013			2012
Assets:
Current Assets:
Cash	$	628,262		$	411,259
Accounts receivable - net		1,047,280			2,673,555
Inventory		546,705			584,370
Prepaid expense		965,659			351,003
Total Current Assets		3,187,906			4,020,187
Fixed Assets:
Computer equipment & software		66,448			66,448
Machinery and equipment		661,596			654,401
Furniture and fixtures		5,665			5,665
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(627,912	)		(597,042	)
Total Fixed Assets		105,797			129,472
Other Non-current Assets:
Product development costs - net		36,114			27,280
Investment (AC Kinetics)		500,000			-
Goodwill		1,936,020			1,936,020
Total Other Non-current Assets		2,472,134			1,963,300
Total Assets	$	5,765,837		$	6,112,959
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	516,051		$	1,114,166
Note payable - Sterling Factors		297,235			1,245,159
Notes and loans payable to related parties - current maturities		4,674,764			602,148
Total Current Liabilities		5,488,050			2,961,473
Long Term Liabilities
Notes and loans payable to related parties - Long Term		-			2,023,283
Total Liabilities		5,488,050			4,984,756
Commitments and Contingent Liablities (Note 5)
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $.001 per share, authorized 100,000,000 shares, issued -0- shares		-			-
Preferred Stock, Series B-1, par value $.0001 per share, authorized 50,000,000 shares, issued -0- shares		-			-
Preferred Stock, Series C, par value $1.00 per share, authorized 1,000 shares, issued 1,000 shares		1,000			1,000
Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share, authorized 850,000,000 shares, 657,760,532 & 655,885,532 shares issued at June 30, 2013 & December 31, 2012		65,778			65,589
Additional paid-in capital		7,172,059			7,137,933
Accumulated deficit		(6,961,050	)		(6,076,319	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		277,787			1,128,203
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	5,765,837		$	6,112,959
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Formerly CHDT Corporation)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
	For the Three Months Ended
	June 30th,						June 30th,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenues	$	1,027,121		$	848,990		$	1,686,916		$	1,187,660
Cost of Sales		(830,174	)		(661,873	)		(1,296,127	)		(892,660	)
Gross Profit		196,947			187,117			390,789			295,000
Operating Expenses:
Sales and marketing		109,297			70,586			166,610			119,774
Compensation		238,693			224,424			468,787			444,504
Professional fees		113,733			53,555			205,457			100,878
Product Development		60,387			64,778			84,006			91,880
Other general and administrative		92,207			77,295			195,575			157,729
Total Operating Expenses		614,317			490,638			1,120,435			914,765
Net Operating Income (Loss)		(417,370	)		(303,521	)		(729,646	)		(619,765	)
Other Income (Expense):
Interest expense		(81,381	)		(57,058	)		(155,085	)		(88,989	)
Total Other Income (Expense)		(81,381	)		(57,058	)		(155,085	)		(88,989	)
Net Income (Loss)	$	(498,751	)	$	(360,579	)	$	(884,731	)	$	(708,754	)
Income (Loss) per Common Share	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
Basic		657,760,532			649,510,532			657,242,576			649,510,532
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Formerly CHDT Corporation)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30th
	2013			2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Continuing operations:
Net Income (Loss)	$	(884,731	)	$	(708,754	)
Adjustments necessary to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Stock issued for expenses		14,064			-
Depreciation and amortization		45,407			25,810
Compensation expense from stock options		20,250			16,500
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable		1,626,275			706,451
(Increase) decrease in inventory		37,665			(517,656	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses		(614,655	)		(757,764	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(23,372	)		(4,346	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(598,114	)		(70,516	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest on notes payable		96,333			82,430
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(280,878	)		(1,227,845	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment		(500,000	)		0
Purchase of property and equipment		(7,195	)		(2,401	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(507,195	)		(2,401	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes payable		2,203,298			1,540,000
Repayments of notes payable		(3,151,222	)		(1,801,281	)
Proceeds from notes and loans payable to related parties		2,528,000			1,553,000
Repayments of notes and loans payable to related parties		(575,000	)		-
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,005,076			1,291,719
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		217,003			61,473
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		411,259			164,610
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	628,262		$	226,083
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	31,602		$	6,560
Franchise and income taxes	$	-		$	-
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
None
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of accounting policies for Capstone Companies, Inc. (“CAPC”), a Florida corporation (formerly, “CHDT Corporation”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“Subsidiaries”) is presented to assist in understanding the Company's financial statements.  The accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements

Interim Financial Statements

The unaudited financial statements as of June 30, 2013 and for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the financial position and results of operations for the three months.  Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results which can be expected for full years.

Organization and Basis of Presentation

CAPC was initially incorporated September 18, 1986 under the laws of the State of Delaware under the name "Yorkshire Leveraged Group, Incorporated", and then changed its domicile to Colorado in 1989 by merging into a Colorado corporation, named "Freedom Funding, Inc." Freedom Funding, Inc. then changed its name to "CBQ, Inc." by amendment of its Articles of Incorporation on November 25, 1998. In May 2004, the Company changed its name from “CBQ, Inc.” to “China Direct Trading Corporation” as part of a reincorporation from the State of Colorado to the State of Florida.  On May 7, 2007, the Company amended its charter to change its name from “China Direct Trading Corporation” to “CHDT Corporation.”  This name change was effective as of July 16, 2007 for purposes of the change of its name on the OTC Bulletin Board.   With the name change, the trading symbol was changed to “CHDO.” On June 6, 2012, the Company amended its charter to change its name from “CHDT Corporation” to “CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC.”  This name change was effective as of July 6, 2012 for purposes of the change of its name on the OTC Bulletin Board.   With the name change, the trading symbol was changed to “CAPC.”

In February 2004, the Company established a new subsidiary, initially named “China Pathfinder Fund, L.L.C.”, a Florida limited liability company. During 2005, the name was changed to “Overseas Building Supply, LLC” (“OBS”) to reflect its shift in business lines from business development consulting services in China for North American companies to trading Chinese-made building supplies in South Florida.  This business line was ended in fiscal year 2007 and OBS name was changed to “Black Box Innovations, L.L.C.” (“BBI”) on March 20, 2008. On January 31, 2012 “BBI” name was changed to “Capstone Lighting Technologies, L.L.C” (“CLT”).

On January 27, 2006, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Complete Power Solutions ("CPS") to acquire 51% of the member interests of CPS. CPS was organized by William Dato on September 20, 2004, as a Florida limited Liability Company to distribute power generators in Florida and adjacent states.  The Company subsequently sold its 51% membership interest in CPS, pursuant to a Purchase and Settlement Agreement dated and effective as of December 31, 2006.

On September 13, 2006 the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Capstone Industries, Inc., a Florida corporation (Capstone).  Capstone was incorporated in Florida on May 15, 1996 and is engaged primarily in the business of wholesaling low technology consumer products to distributors and retailers in the United States.  Under the Stock Purchase Agreement the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Capstone Common Stock, and recorded goodwill of $1,936,020.

On April 13, 2012 , the Company established a wholly owned subsidiary in Hong Kong, named “ Capstone International Hong Kong Ltd” (CIHK) which will be engaged in selling the Companies products Internationally and will provide other services such as, new product development, product sourcing, quality control, ocean freight logistics, product testing and factory certifications for the Companies other subsidiaries.

Nature of Business

Since the beginning of fiscal year 2007, the Company has been primarily engaged in the business of developing, marketing and selling consumer products through national and regional retailers and distributors, in North America.  Capstone currently operates in four primary business segments: Induction Charged Power Failure Lights, Motion Sensor Lights, Portable Book and Task Lights and Door Security Monitor.  The Company’s products are typically manufactured in the Peoples’ Republic of China by third-party manufacturing companies.

5

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents, to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

An allowance for doubtful accounts is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for bad debts charged to earnings.  The allowance for bad debt is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the receivables.  This evaluation is inherently subjective and requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available.

As of June 30, 2013, management has determined that the accounts receivable are fully collectible.  As such, management has not recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts.

Inventory

The Company's inventory, which is recorded at lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market, consists of finished goods for resale by Capstone, totaling $546,705 and $584,370 at June 30 , 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Property and Equipment

Fixed assets are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated economic useful lives of the related assets as follows:

Computer equipment	3 - 7 years
Computer software	3 - 7 years
Machinery and equipment	3 - 7 years
Furniture and fixtures	3 - 7 years

Long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable.  When required, impairment losses on assets to be held and used are recognized based on the fair value of the asset.  Long-lived assets to be disposed of, if any, are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.  No impairments were recognized by the Company during 2013 or through December 31, 2012.

Upon sale or other disposition of property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in the determination of income or loss.

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Major overhauls and betterments are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated economic useful lives.

Depreciation expense was $30,868 and $ 17,454  for the period ended June 30 , 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets acquired, either individually or with a group of other assets (but not those acquired in a business combination), are initially recognized and measured based on fair value.  Goodwill acquired in business combinations is initially computed as the amount paid by the acquiring company in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired.

The cost of internally developing, maintaining and restoring intangible assets (including goodwill) that are not specifically identifiable, that have indeterminate lives, or that are inherent in a continuing business and related to an entity as a whole, are recognized as an expense when incurred.

An intangible asset (excluding goodwill) with a definite useful life is amortized; an intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is not amortized until its useful life is determined to be no longer indefinite.  The remaining useful lives of intangible assets not being amortized are evaluated at least annually to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.

6

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

If and when an intangible asset is determined to no longer have an indefinite useful life, the asset shall then be amortized prospectively over its estimated remaining useful life and accounted for in the same manner as other intangibles that are subject to amortization.

An intangible asset (including goodwill) that is not subject to amortization shall be tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.  The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible assets with its carrying amount.  If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.  Goodwill is not amortized.

It is the Company's policy to test for impairment no less than annually, or when conditions occur that may indicate impairment.  The Company's intangible assets, which consist of goodwill of $1,936,020 recorded in connection with the Capstone acquisition, were tested for impairment and determined that no adjustment for impairment was necessary as of December 31, 2012, whereas the fair value of the intangible asset exceeds its carrying amount.

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share were computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year.  In periods where losses are reported, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.  At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the total number of potentially dilutive common stock equivalents was 159,946,577 and 155,446,577 respectively.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 include the accounts of the parent entity and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Capstone Lighting Technologies, L.L.C (formerly Black Box Innovations, L.L.C.), Capstone Industries, Inc. and Capstone International HK, LTD.

The results of operations attributable to subsidiaries are included in the consolidated results of operations beginning on the date on which the Company’s interest in a subsidiary was acquired.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of the Company's financial instruments, including cash, prepaid expenses, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities at June 30, 2013 and 2012 approximates their fair values due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The fair value hierarchy under GAAP distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:

·   Level one — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

·   Level two — Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

·   Level three — Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter.

Cost Method of Accounting for Investment

Investments in equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values and do not qualify for consolidation or the equity method are carried at cost.  Dividends received from those companies are included in other income.  Dividends received in excess of the Company’s proportionate share of accumulated earnings are applied as a reduction of the cost of the investment.  Other than temporary impairments to fair value are charged against current period income.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in the 2012 financial statements to conform to the 2013 presentation.  There were no material changes in classifications made to previously issued financial statements.

7

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Revenue Recognition

Product sales are recognized when an agreement of sale exists, product delivery has occurred, pricing is final or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.

Allowances for sales returns, rebates and discounts are recorded as a component of net sales in the period the allowances are recognized.  In addition, accrued liabilities contained in the accompanying balance sheet include accruals for estimated amounts of credits to be issued in future years based on potentially defective product, other product returns and various allowances.  These estimates could change significantly in the near term.

Advertising and Promotion

Advertising and promotion costs, including advertising, public relations, and trade show expenses, are expensed as incurred and included in Sales and Marketing expenses.  Advertising and promotion expense was $53,699and $ 56,480 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of June 30, 2013 the company has $275,019 in capitalized advertising costs included in prepaid expenses on the balance sheet.

Shipping and Handling

The Company’s shipping and handling costs, are included in sales and marketing expenses and amounted to $56,954 and $50,587 for the six months ended June  30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities contained in the accompanying balance sheet include accruals for estimated amounts of credits to be issued in future years based on potentially defective products, other product returns and various allowances.  These estimates could change significantly in the near term.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 109 (SFAS 109), "Accounting for Income Taxes." SFAS 109 (now ASC 740) requires recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences, based on enacted tax laws, of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company and its subsidiaries intend to file consolidated income tax returns.

Stock-Based Compensation

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payments, SFAS 123(R), (now ASC 718) which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options, based on estimated fair values.  ASC 718 supersedes the Company’s previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations, applied for periods through December 31, 2005.  In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) relating to ASC 718.  The Company has applied the provision of SAB 107 in its adoption of ASC 718.

The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective application transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006, the first day of the Company’s fiscal year.  The Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and later, reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R).  In accordance with the modified prospective method, the Company’s consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123(R).

8

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

SFAS 123(R) ASC 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of the grant using an option-pricing model.  The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expenses over the requisite service periods in the Company’s consolidated statements of income (loss).  Prior to the adoption of ASC 718, the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB 25, as allowed under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (SFAS 123).  Under the intrinsic value method, compensation expense under fixed term option plans was recorded at the date of grant only to the extent that the market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant exceeded the exercise price.  Accordingly, for those stock options granted for which the exercise price equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant, no expense was recorded.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period.  There was no stock-based compensation expense attributable to options for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not vested as of December 31, 2005.  Such stock-based compensation is based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS 123.  Compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, are based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718.

In conjunction with the adoption of ASC 718, the Company adopted the straight-line single option method of attributing the value of stock-based compensation expense.  As stock-based compensation expense is recognized during the period is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it is subject to reduction for estimated forfeitures.  ASC 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.  As of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, there were no material amounts subject to forfeiture.  The Company has not accelerated vesting terms of its out-of-the-money stock options, or made any other significant changes, prior to adopting ASC 718, Share-Based Payments.

On April 23, 2007, the Company granted 130,500,000 stock options to two officers of the Company.  The options vest at twenty percent per year beginning April 23, 2007.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized compensation expense of $503,075 related to these options.  On May 1, 2008, 850,000 of the above stock options were canceled and on May 23, 2008, 74,666,667 of the above stock options were cancelled.  For year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $405,198 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $156,557 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized a compensation expense of $156,558 related to these options. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized compensation expense of $52,186 related to these options. No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On May 1, 2007, the Company granted 4,000,000 stock options to five employees of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized compensation expense of $29,214 related to these options.  During 2008 and 2009, 1,500,000 of the above options were cancelled prior to vesting.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $25,131 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $10,869 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2009 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On October 22, 2007, the Company granted 700,000 stock options to a business associate of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized compensation expense of $1,330 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $7,978 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $6,648 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2009 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On January 10, 2008, the Company granted 1,000,000 stock options to an advisor of the Company.  The options vest over one year.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $19,953 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2008 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

9

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

On February 5, 2008, the Company granted 3,650,000 stock options to four directors and one employee of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $59,619 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $2,603 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2009 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  During 2010, 3,500,000 of the above options expired.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On May 1, 2008, the Company granted 850,000 stock options to an employee of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $5,242 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $7,862 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $2,620 related to these options. No further expense will be recognized for these options.

On June 8, 2009, the Company granted 4,500,000 stock options to four directors of the Company. The options vest in one year.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $42,663 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $33,837 related to these options. No further expense will be recognized for these options.  These options expired on June 8, 2011.

On April 23, 2010, the Company granted 4,800,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and the Company Secretary. The options vest in one year.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $27,000 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2011 the Company recognized compensation expense of $12,000.  No further expense will be recognized for these options.

On July 1, 2011, the Company granted 4,650,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and the Company Secretary. The options vest in one year. For the year ended December 31, 2011 the Company recognized compensation expense of $16,500.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized an expense of $16,500.  No further expense will be recognized for these options.

On August 6, 2012, the Company granted 4,650,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and the Company Secretary. The options vest in one year.  The Company Secretary left the Company and 150,000 stock options were cancelled. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense of $20,250.  For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized an expense of $20,250.  No further expense will be recognized for these options.

The Company recognizes compensation expense paid with common stock and other equity instruments issued for assets and services received based upon the fair value of the assets/services or the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily determined.

As of the date of this report the Company has not adopted a method to account for the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to ASC 718 and related interpretations.  However, whereas the Company has substantial net operating losses to offset future taxable income and its current deferred tax asset is completely reduced by the valuation allowance, no material tax effects are anticipated.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company valued stock options using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB 25.  Since the exercise price of stock options previously issued was greater than or equal to the market price on grant date, no compensation expense was recognized.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $20,250 and $16,500 respectively.

10

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Recent Accounting Standards

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-04 “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820).” The amendments in ASU 2011-04 change the wording used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments include (1) those that clarify the Board's intent about the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and (2) those that change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. In addition, to improve consistency in application across jurisdictions some changes in wording are necessary to ensure that U.S. GAAP and IFRS fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are described in the same way (for example, using the word shall rather than should to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP). The amendments that clarify the Board's intent about the application of  existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements include (a) the application of the highest and best use and valuation premise concepts, (b) measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entity's shareholders' equity, and (c) disclosures about fair value measurements that clarify that a reporting entity should disclose quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in a fair value measurement that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The amendments in this Update that change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements include (a) measuring the fair value of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio, (b) application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement, and (c) additional disclosures about fair value measurements that expand the disclosures about fair value measurements. The amendments in ASU 2011-04 are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-05 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).”  Under the amendments in this Update, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. In a single continuous statement, the entity is required to present the components of net income and total net income, the components of other comprehensive income and a total for other comprehensive income, along with the total of comprehensive income in that statement. In the two-statement approach, an entity is required to present components of net income and total net income in the statement of net income. The statement of other comprehensive income should immediately follow the statement of net income and include the components of other comprehensive income and a total for other comprehensive income, along with a total for comprehensive income.  The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments do not require any transition disclosures.  The Company’s adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-12 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).”  In order to defer only those changes in Update 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments, the paragraphs in this Update supersede certain pending paragraphs in Update 2011-05. The amendments are being made to allow the Board time to re-deliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the Board is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before Update 2011-05.All other requirements in Update 2011-05 are not affected by this Update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.  The Company’s adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

11

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment" ("ASU 2012-02"), which permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit's indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than the asset's carrying value before applying the two-step goodwill impairment model that is currently in place. If it is determined through the qualitative assessment that the fair value of a reporting unit's indefinite-lived intangible asset is more likely than not greater than the asset's carrying value, the remaining impairment steps would be unnecessary. The qualitative assessment is optional, allowing companies to go directly to the quantitative assessment. ASU 2012-02 is effective for the Company for annual and interim indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed beginning October 1, 2012; however, early adoption is permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2012-02 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

The Company continually assesses any new accounting pronouncements to determine their applicability to the Company. Where it is determined that a new accounting pronouncement affects the Company’s financial reporting, the Company undertakes a study to determine the consequence of the change to its financial statements and assures that there are proper controls in place to ascertain that the Company’s financials properly reflect the change.

Pervasiveness of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and the differences could be material.

NOTE 2 - CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable.

The Company has no significant off-balance-sheet concentrations of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, options contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company at times has cash and cash equivalents with its financial institution in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance limits.  The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions which minimize these risks.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $226,810  funds in excess of FDIC limits.

Accounts Receivable

The Company grants credit to its customers, substantially all of whom are retail establishments located throughout the United States.  The Company typically does not require collateral from customers.  Credit risk is limited due to the financial strength of the customers comprising the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across different geographical regions.  The Company monitors exposure of credit losses and maintains allowances for anticipated losses considered necessary under the circumstances.

12

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 - CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE (continued)

Major Customers

The Company had three customers who comprised at least ten percent (10%) of gross revenue during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.  The loss of these customers would adversely impact the business of the Company.  The percentage of gross revenue and the accounts receivable from each of these customers is as follows:

	Gross Revenue %			Accounts Receivable
	2012	2011		2012		2011
Customer A	60%	55%	$	2,208,495	$	1,014,690
Customer B	10%	19%		464,601		488,468
Customer C	12%	13%		35,435		0
	82%	87%	$	2,708,531	$	1,503,158

Major Vendors

The Company had two vendors from which it purchased at least ten percent (10%) of merchandise during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The loss of these suppliers would adversely impact the business of the Company.  The percentage of purchases, and the related accounts payable from each of these vendors is as follows:

	Purchases %			Accounts Payable
	2012	2011		2012		2011
Vendor A	81%	62%	$	818,883	$	291,350
Vendor B	13%	35%		28,834		350
	94%	97%	$	847,717	$	291,700

NOTE 3 – NOTES PAYABLE

Sterling National Bank

On September 8,2010, in order to fund increasing Accounts Receivables and support working capital needs, Capstone secured a Financing Agreement from Sterling Capital Funding,(now called Sterling National Bank), located in New York, whereby Capstone receives funds for assigned retailer shipments. The assignments provide funding for an amount up to 85% of net invoices submitted.  There will be a base management fee equal to .45% of the gross invoice amount. The interest rate of the loan advance is ¼% above Sterling National Bank Base Rate which at time of closing was 5%.  The amounts borrowed under this agreement are secured by a right to set-off on or against any of the following (collectively as “Collateral”): all accounts including those at risk, all reserves, instruments, documents, notes, bills and chattel paper, letter of credit rights, commercial tort claims, proceeds of insurance, other forms of obligations owing to Sterling, bank and other deposit accounts whether or not reposed with affiliates, general intangibles (including without limitation all tax refunds, contract rights, trade names, trademarks, trade secrets, customer lists, software and all other licenses, rights, privileges and franchises), all balances, sums and other property at any time to our credit or in Sterling’s possession or in the possession of any Sterling Affiliates, together with all merchandise, the sale of which resulted in the creation of accounts receivable and in all such merchandise that may be returned by customers and all books and records relating to any of the foregoing, including the cash and non-cash proceeds of all of the foregoing.  Capstone Companies, Inc., formerly (CHDT Corp) and Howard Ullman, the previous Chairman of the Board of Directors of CHDT, had personally guaranteed Capstone Industries obligations under the Financial Agreement. As part of the agreement with Sterling National Bank, a subordination agreement was executed with Howard Ullman, a shareholder and director of the Company at that time.  These agreements subordinated the debt of $121,263 (plus future interest) and $81,000 (plus future interest) due to Howard Ullman (or his assigns), to the Sterling National Bank loan.  No payments will be made on the subordinated debt until the Sterling loan is paid in full.  As of December 31, 2012, the balance due to Sterling was $1,245,159.  As of June 30, 2013, the balance due to Sterling was $297,235.

13

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3 – NOTES PAYABLE (continued)

On July 21, 2011 Stewart Wallach, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of Capstone Companies, Inc. formerly (CHDT) and JWTR Holdings, LLC   owned by a Director, Jeffrey Postal entered into a Securities and Notes Purchase Agreement with Howard Ullman, the previous Chairman of the Board of CHDT, whereby they would purchase equally all of Howard Ullmans notes including the notes subordinated to Sterling National Bank.

On July 15, 2011, Stewart Wallach individually and accepted by Sterling National Bank, agreed to replace Howard Ullman as the sole personal guarantor to Sterling National Bank for all of Capstone Industries, Inc. loans previously guaranteed by Howard Ullman.

Effective July 12, 2011, Capstone Industries, Inc., credit line with Sterling National Bank was increased from $2,000,000 up to $4,000,000 to provide additional funding for increased revenue growth.

Effective October 1st, 2011, Sterling Capital Funding will be conducting business as the Factoring and Trade Division of Sterling National Bank.  All obligations under our agreements have been assigned to Sterling National Bank.

NOTE 4 – NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES

Capstone Companies, Inc. - Notes Payable to Officers and Directors

On May 30, 2007, the Company executed a $575,000 promissory note payable to a director of the Company.  This note was amended on July 1, 2009 and again on January 2, 2010. As amended, the note carries an interest rate of 8% per annum.  All principal is payable in full, with accrued interest, on January 2, 2014.  On November 2, 2007, the Company issued 12,074 shares of its Series B Preferred stock valued at $28,975 as payment towards this loan.  The loan grants to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.

On July 12, 2011 Stewart Wallach, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of CHDT and JWTR Holdings, LLC owned by a Director, Jeffrey Postal entered into a Securities and Notes Purchase Agreement with Howard Ullman, the previous Chairman of the Board of CHDT, whereby they would purchase equally all of Howard Ullmans notes including the subordinated notes net of any offsets, monies due by Howard Ullman to the Company. The original terms of all notes would remain the same. On July 12, 2011 this note payable was reassigned by Howard Ullman, equally split between Stewart Wallach Director and JWTR Holdings LLC.   The note balance of $466,886 was reduced by $47,940 for offsets due by Howard Ullman. The revised loan balance of $418,946 was reassigned equally $209,473 to Stewart Wallach and $209,473 to JWTR Holdings LLC. As amended the note is due on or before January 2, 2014.  At December 31, 2011, the total amount payable on the reassigned notes to Stewart Wallach was $216,498 which includes accrued interest of $7025 and JWTR Holdings, LLC was $216,498 which includes accrued interest of $7,025.  At December 31, 2012, the total amount payable on the reassigned notes to Stewart Wallach was $233,256 which includes accrued interest of $23,783 and JWTR Holdings; LLC was $233,256 which includes accrued interest of $23,783.  For the revised notes the interest payments are being accrued monthly to the note holders.  As of June 30, 2013 the total combined balance due on these two notes was $483,132 which includes interest of $64,186.

On July 11, 2008, the Company received a loan from a director of $250,000.  As amended, the note is due on or before January 2, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum.  At December 31, 2012, the total amount payable on this note was $310,000 including interest of $60,000.  At June 30, 2013, the total amount payable on this note was $319,918 including interest of $69,918.

As part of this note payable, the Company also issued a warrant to the loan holder to purchase 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.025 per share.  At the date of issuance, the stock price was $.021 per share.  The Company accounted for the debt and warrants using APB 14, whereby the proceeds of $250,000 were allocated between the debt and warrants.  This resulted in the warrants being valued at $56,375, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital, and a discount on the note of $56,375 being recognized.  The discount was amortized over the term of the note (6 months) to interest expense.  At December 31, 2008, the discount had been fully amortized resulting in interest expense of $56,375 being recognized.

On March 11, 2010, the Company received a loan from a director of $100,000. As amended, the note is due on or before January 2, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum.  At December 31, 2012 the total amount payable on this note was $122,466 including interest of $22,466.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $126,433 including interest of $26,433.

14

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4 – NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES (continued)

On May 11, 2010, the Company received a loan from a director of $75,000. As amended, the note is due on or before January 2, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum.  The loan grants to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.  At December 31, 2012 the total amount payable on this note was $90,847 including interest of $15,847.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $93,822, including interest of $18,822.

On June 11, 2010, the Company received a loan from a director of $150,000. As amended, the note is due on or before January 2, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum.  The loan grants to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.  At December 31, 2012 the total amount payable on this note was $180,674 including interest of $30,674.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $186,625 including interest of $36,625.

On April 8, 2013, the Company received a loan from a director of $150,000. The note is due on or before October 8, 2013 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum. At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $152,729 including interest of $2,729.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company executed three notes payable for a combined total of $200,000 to an officer of the Company.  As amended, the notes are due on or before January 2, 2014 and carry an interest rate of 8% per annum.  These loans grant to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.  At December 31, 2012 the total amount due on these notes was $248,000, including interest of $48,000.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount due on these notes was $255,935 including interest of $55,935.

On January 15, 2013, the company received a new loan of $250,000 from Stewart Wallach, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of Capstone Companies, Inc. formerly (CHDT) with due date on or before January 15, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum. This loan grants to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $259,096 including interest of $9,096

On January 15, 2013, the company received a new loan of $250,000 from a director of Capstone Companies, Inc. formerly (CHDT) with due date on or before January 15, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum. This loan grants to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $259,906 including interest of $9,096.

Capstone Industries – Notes Payable to Officers and Directors

On July 16, 2007, Capstone Industries executed a $103,000 promissory note payable to a director of the Company.  As amended, the note carries an interest rate of 8% per annum and is due on or before January 2, 2013.  In December 2008, the Company borrowed an additional $75,000 from this director.  As amended, this note was due on or before January 2, 2013, but it has been extended and is due on or before January 2, 2014. These loans grant to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.

On July 12, 2011 Stewart Wallach, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of CHDT and JWTR Holdings, LLC owned by a Director, Jeffrey Postal entered into a Securities and Notes Purchase Agreement  with Howard Ullman, the previous Chairman of the Board of CHDT, whereby they would purchase all of Howard Ullman’s notes including the subordinated notes. The original terms of all notes would remain the same.  On July 12, 2011 the subordinated note payable was reassigned by Howard Ullman, to Stewart Wallach director and JWTR Holding LLC.  The original note balance of $178,000 was reassigned to Stewart Wallach and to JWTR Holdings LLC. For the year 2011 the interest payments were paid monthly to the note holder as of July 31, 2011. As amended, this note was due on or before January 2, 2013 but it has been extended and is due on or before January 2, 2014.

At December 31, 2012 the total amount due on these two notes was $222,472, including interest of $44,472.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount due on these two notes was $229,533, including interest of $51,533.

Purchase Order Assignment- Funding Agreements

During the Second Quarter 2012, Capstone Industries, Inc. received a $432,000 loan from George Wolf who is a business partner of the CEO. The loan is due on or before August 31, 2012 and carries an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual).  As of December 31, 2012 the note balance was paid in full.

15

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4 – NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES (continued)

During the Second Quarter 2012, Capstone Industries, Inc. received a $746,000 loan from Jeffrey Postal a director of the Company. The loan is due on or before January 2, 2013 and carries an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual).  As of December 31, 2012 the total amount due on these notes was $602,148 including interest of $27,148. During the first Quarter 2013, the loan balance was paid in full and the total amount due on these notes is $0.00.

During the Second Quarter 2013, Capstone Industries, Inc. received total $1,150,000 under three notes from Jeffrey Postal a director of the Company.  These notes are due on or before January 2, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual).  As of June 30, 2014 the total amount due under these notes was $1,168,099 including interest of $18,099.

During the Second Quarter 2012, Capstone Industries, Inc. received a $375,000 loan from Phyllis Postal. Mrs. Postal is a mother of a director of the Company. The loan was due on or before September 30, 2012 and carried an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual).  During the Third Quarter 2012, an additional $150,000 loan was received and then the entire balance was paid in full in September 2012. As of December 31, 2012 the total amount due on these notes is $0.00.

During the First Quarter 2013, Capstone Industries, Inc. received two notes from George Wolf who is business partner of the CEO Stewart Wallach, with payment due date of on or before January 02, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual).  Note # 021313 dated February 13, 2013, total amount due at June 30, 2013 was $233,400, including interest of $8,400.  Note # 032013 dated March 20, 2013, total note amount due at June 30, 2013 was $41,341 including accrued interest of $1,341.  On April 15th, the company received a new note advance of $40,000 with payment due date of on or before January 02, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 1% simple per month (12% annual), the total amount due at June 30, 2013 was $40,999 including interest of $999.

During the Third Quarter 2012, Capstone Industries, Inc. received a $220,000 loan from Everett Fleisig who is the father in law of an officer of the company. The loan is due on or before January 2, 2013 and carries an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual). As of December 31, 2012 the total amount due on this note was $0.00.

On October 10, 2012, the Company entered into agreement with Phyllis Postal, which carried a simple interest rate of 1% per month (12% annual), the Company received $200,000 under this agreement which was paid in full with accrued interest as of December 31, 2012. On May 21, 2013, the Company entered into agreement with Phyllis Postal, which carries a simple interest rate of 1% per month (12% annual) with payment due date on or before January 2, 2014. The total amount due on this note at June 30, 2013 was $303,058 including interest of $3,058.

Working Capital Loan Agreements

On April 1st 2012, the Company signed a working capital loan agreement with Postal Capital Funding, LLC, (“PCF”) a private capital funding company owned by Jeffrey Postal and James McClinton who is a director and director and senior officer of the Company.  Pursuant to the agreement, the company may borrow up to a maximum of $1,000,000 of revolving credit from PCF.  Amounts borrowed were to be repaid by April 1, 2013 at an interest rate of 8%.  As amended, this note is due on or before January 2, 2014.  As of December 31, 2012, the loan balance under this agreement was $382,310 including interest of $7,310. During the first two quarters 2013, additional $123,000 loan was received by the company. As of June 30, 2013, the loan balance under this agreement was $521,548 including interest of $23,548

16

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes and Loans Payable to Related Parties – Maturities

The total amount payable to officers, directors and related parties as of June 30, 2013 was 4,674,764 including accrued interest of $276,335.  The maturities under the notes and loan payable to related parties for the next five years are:

Year Ended December, 31,
2013	$	152,729
2014		4,522,035
2015		-
2016		-
2017		-
Total future maturities		4,674,764

NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

On June 29, 2007, the Company relocated its principal executive offices and sole operations facility to 350 Jim Moran Blvd., Suite 120, Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442, which is located in Broward County.  This space consists of 4,000 square rentable feet and is leased on a month to month basis.  Monthly payments are approximately $4,650 per month.

Rental expense under these leases was approximately $27,935 and $28,222 for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Employment Agreements

On February 5, 2008, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Stewart Wallach, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, whereby Mr. Wallach will be paid $225,000 per annum.  As part of the agreement, Mr. Wallach will receive a minimum increase of 5% per year.  For 2009, Mr. Wallach was paid $236,250, and for 2010 Mr. Wallach was paid $175,412.  For 2011 Mr. Wallach was paid was paid $180,000 and for 2012 he was paid $260,033.  An amount of $40,233 has been accrued and is included on the balance sheet as part of accounts payable and accrued expenses for deferred wages in 2011.  This balance remains unpaid at December 31, 2012 and continues to be reported as part of accounts payable and accrued expenses.  The term of the contract begins February 5, 2008 and ends on February 5, 2011, but the term of the contract was extended for a further two years through February 5, 2013.  The Compensation Committee has further extended the agreement with the same terms for a further two years through February 5, 2015.

On February 5, 2008, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Gerry McClinton, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, whereby Mr. McClinton will be paid $150,000 per annum.  As part of the agreement, Mr. McClinton will receive a minimum increase of 5% per year.  For 2009, Mr. McClinton was paid $157,500 and for 2010 Mr. McClinton was paid $113,546. For 2011, Mr McClinton was paid $146,250 and for 2012 he was paid $187,000.  An amount of $572 has been accrued and is included on the balance sheet as part of accounts payable and accrued expenses for deferred wages in 2011.  This balance remains unpaid at December 31, 2012 and continues to be reported as part of accounts payable and accrued expenses.  The term of the contract begins February 5, 2008 and ends on February 5, 2011 but the term of the contract was extended for a further two years through February 5, 2013. The Compensation Committee has further extended the agreement with the same terms for a further two years through February 5, 2015.

On February 5, 2008, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Howard Ullman, the Chairman of Board of Directors of the Company, whereby Mr. Ullman will be paid $100,000 per annum. For 2010 Mr. Ullman was paid $73,444. The term of the contract began February 5, 2008 and ended on February 5, 2011 and was been extended until June 30, 2011.  As of July 1st 2011 Mr. Ullman is no longer an employee of the Company.

17

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 6 - STOCK TRANSACTIONS

Series “C” Preferred Stock

On July 9, 2009, the Company authorized and issued 1,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock in exchange for $700,000.  The 1,000 shares of Series C Stock are convertible into 67,979,725 common shares.  The par value of the Series C Preferred shares is $1.00.

Warrants

The Company has outstanding stock warrants that were issued in prior years to its officers and directors for a total of 5,975,000 shares of the Company's common stock. 1,975,000 of these warrants had an exercise price of $.05 and expired on November 11, 2011.  The remaining 4,000,000 warrants expire July 20, 2014. The warrants have an exercise price of $.03.

The Company issued a stock warrant to each of two former officers of the Company in December 2003 for a total of 35,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Each of the stock warrants expires on July 20, 2014, and entitles each former officer to purchase 10,000 and 25,000 shares, respectively, of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.05.

During September and October 2007, the Company issued 31,823,529 shares of common stock for cash at $.017 per share, or $541,000 total as part of a Private Placement under Rule 506 of Regulation D.  Along with the stock, each investor also received a warrant to purchase 30% of the shares purchased in the Private Placement.  A total of 9,548,819 warrants were issued.  The warrants are ten year warrants and have an exercise price of $.025 per share.

On July 11, 2008, the Company received a loan from a director of $250,000.  As part of this note payable, the Company also issued a warrant to the loan holder to purchase 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.025 per share.  At the date of issuance, the stock price was $.021 per share.  The Company accounted for the debt and warrants using APB 14, whereby the proceeds of $250,000 were allocated between the debt and warrants.  This resulted in the warrants being valued at $56,375 which was recorded as additional paid-in capital, and a discount on the note of $56,375 being recognized.  The discount was amortized over the term of the note (6 months) to interest expense.  At December 31, 2008, the discount had been fully amortized resulting in interest expense of $56,375 being recognized.  These warrants expire July 10, 2013.

Options

In 2005, the Company authorized the 2005 Equity Plan that made available 10,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance through awards of options, restricted stock, stock bonuses, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units.  On May 20, 2005 the Company granted non-qualified stock options under the company’s 2005 Equity Plan for a maximum of 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $0.02 per share. The options expire May 25, 2015 and may be exercised any time after May 25, 2005.

On May 1, 2007, the Company granted 4,000,000 stock options to five employees of the Company under the 2005 Plan.  The options vest over two years.  During 2008, 1,000,000 of these options were cancelled prior to vesting.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $10,869 and $25,131 related to these stock options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 4.64%

Expected term – 11 years

Expected volatility of stock – 131.13%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

18

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 6 - STOCK TRANSACTIONS (continued)

On April 23, 2007, the Company granted a ten-year non-qualified, non-statutory stock option for 102,400,000 “restricted” shares of the Company’s common stock to Stewart Wallach, the Company’s CEO, as incentive compensation.  The exercise price of the options is $.029 per share, which was the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant.  Twenty percent of the options vested on the date of issuance, and twenty percent per year will vest on the anniversary date through April 23, 2011.  On May 23, 2008, 74,666,667 of these options were cancelled.  Compensation expense was recognized through the date of the cancellation of the options. On July 31st, 2009, 5,000,000 of the fully vested options and fully expensed options were amended and transferred to G. McClinton.  Also on April 23, 2007, the Company granted a ten-year non-qualified, non-statutory stock option for 28,100,000 “restricted” shares of the Company’s common stock to Gerry McClinton, the Company’s COO and Secretary, as incentive compensation.  The exercise price of the options is $.029 per share, which was the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant.  Twenty percent of the options vested on the date of issuance, and twenty percent per year will vest on the anniversary date through April 23, 2011.  On May 1, 2008, 850,000 of these options were cancelled. On July 31st, 2009, 5,000,000 of S. Wallach fully vested and fully expensed options were amended and transferred to G. McClinton.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $156,558 and $156,557 related to these stock options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 4.66%

Expected term – 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 133.59%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

The Company has recognized compensation expense of $52,186 for the year ended December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2011 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options after 2011.

On October 22, 2007, the Company granted 700,000 stock options to a business associate of the Company.  The options vest over two years.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $6,648 and $7,978 related to these stock options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 4.42%

Expected term – 11 and 12 years

Expected volatility of stock – 134.33%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On January 10, 2008, the Company granted 1,000,000 stock options to an advisor of the Company.  The options vest over one year.

19

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 6 - STOCK TRANSACTIONS (continued)

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $19,953 related to these options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 3.91%

Expected term – 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 133.83%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On February 5, 2008, the Company granted 3,650,000 stock options to four directors and one employee of the Company.  The options vest over two years.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $2,603 and $59,619 related to these options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 1.93% to 3.61%

Expected term – 2 to 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 133.83%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On May 1, 2008, the Company granted 850,000 stock options to an employee of the Company.  The options vest over two years.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $2,620 and $7,862 related to these options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 3.78%

Expected term – 11 years

Expected volatility of stock – 133.59%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

The Company recognized compensation expense of $2,620 in 2010 related to these stock options. As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On June 8, 2009, the Company granted 4,500,000 stock options to four directors of the Company.  The options vest over one year.

20

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 6 - STOCK TRANSACTIONS (continued)

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. For the years ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $33,837 related to these options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 1.42%

Expected term – 2 years

Expected volatility of stock – 500.5%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  As of June 8, 2011 these options had expired. No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On April 23rd, 2010, the Company granted 4,500,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and 300,000 stock options to the Company Secretary.  The options vest over one year.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted.  For the years ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $27,000 related to these options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 2.61%

Expected term – 5 to 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 500.5%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized compensation expense of $12,000 related to these stock options. As of December 31, 2011 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On July 1, 2011, the Company granted 4,500,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and 150,000 stock options to the Company Secretary.  The options vest over one year.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 1.80 – 3.22%

Expected term – 5 to 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 500%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 150

For the six months ended December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense of $ 16,500 respectively, for a total compensation expense of $33,000 of compensation expense related to these stock options.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On August 6, 2012, the Company granted 4,500,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and 150,000 stock options to the Company Secretary.  The options vest over one year.  The Company Secretary has subsequently left the Company and the 150,000 granted options that have been cancelled.

21

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 6 - STOCK TRANSACTIONS (continued)

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – .65 – 1.59%

Expected term – 5 to 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 500%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 150

For the period ended December31, 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense of $20,250 related to these stock options. For the 6 months ended June 30, 2013, $20,250 compensation expense was recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

The following table sets forth the Company’s stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and activity for the years then ended:

			Weighted
		Weighted	Average
		Average	Remaining	Aggregate
		Exercise	Contractual	Intrinsic
	Shares	Price	Term (Years)	Value
Outstanding, January 1, 2012	69,883,333	$    0.029	5.26	$          -
Granted	4,650,000	0.029	-	-
Exercised	-	-	-	-
Forfeited/expired	150,000	0.029	-	-
Outstanding, December31 , 2012	74,383,333	$    0.029	4.28	$           -
Granted	-	-	-	-
Exercised	-	-	-	-
Forfeited/expired		-	-	-
Outstanding, June 30, 2013	74,383,333	$    0.029	3.78	$           -
Vested/exercisable at December 31, 2012	69,883,333	$    0.029	4.26	$           -
Vested/exercisable at June 30, 2013	69,883,333	$    0.029	3.76	$           -

The following table summarizes the information with respect to options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan:

Exercise Price	Options Outstanding	Remaining Contractual Life in Years	Average Exercise Price	Number of Options Currently Exercisable
$.02	250,000	1.92	$.020	250,000
$.029	54,983,333	3.83	$.029	54,983,333
$.029	2,500,000	4.83	$.029	2,500,000
$.029	700,000	5.83	$.029	700,000
$.029	1,000,000	4.50	$.029	1,000,000
$.029	150,000	4.58	$.029	150,000
$.029	850,000	5.92	$.029	850,000
$.029	4,500,000	1.83	$.029	4,500,000
$.029	300,000	6.83	$.029	300,000
$.029	4,500,000	3.00	$.029	4,500,000
$.029	150,000	8.00	$.029	150,000
$.029	4,500,000	4.08	$.029	4,500,000

22

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 7 - INCOME TAXES

As of December 31, 2012, the Company had a net operating loss carry forward for income tax reporting purposes of approximately $4,600,000 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2031. Current tax laws limit the amount of loss available to be offset against future taxable income when a substantial change in ownership occurs. Therefore, the amount available to offset future taxable income may be limited.  No tax benefit has been reported in the financial statements, because the Company believes there is a 50% or greater chance the carry forwards will expire unused. Accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the loss carryforwards are offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

	2012			2011
Net Operating (Profit) Losses	$	1,564,000		$	1,326,000
Valuation Allowance		(1,564,000	)		(1,326,000	)
	$	-		$	-

The provision for income taxes differ from the amount computed using the federal US statutory income tax rate as follows:

	2012			2011
Provision (Benefit) at US Statutory Rate	$	(206,000	)	$	196,000
State Income Tax		-			(32,000	)
Depreciation and Amortization		(68,000	)		(60,000	)
Accrued Officer Compensation		-			14,000
Non-Deductible Stock Based Compensation		12,000			27,000
Other Differences		24,000			25,000
Increase (Decrease) in Valuation Allowance		238,000			(170,000	)
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)	$	-		$	-

The Company evaluates its valuation allowance requirements based on projected future operations.  When circumstances change and cause a change in management’s judgment about the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the impact of the change on the valuation is reflected in current income.

The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service and the Florida Department of Revenue for the years ending December 31, 2009 through 2012.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income taxes in income tax expense. The Company had incurred no penalties and interest for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

NOTE 8 – OTHER ASSETS

Other Assets at June 30, 2013 and 2012 consists of the following:

	2013			2012			Life in Years
Packaging Artwork and Design	$	298,804			255,817			2
Less:  Accumulated Amortization		(262,690	)		(236,204	)
	$	36,114			19,613

Amortization expense for the year ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $14,538 and $8,356

23

CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Formerly CHDT Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 9 – COST METHOD INVESTMENTS

On January 15, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with AC Kinetics, Inc. to purchase 100 shares of AC Kinetics Series A Preferred Stock for $500,000. These shares carry a liquidation preference in the amount of $500,000, are convertible at the companies demand into 3% of the outstanding shares of AC Kinetics common stock and have anti-dilution protection.

In addition, the Company and AC Kinetics have agreed to cooperate in the development and commercialization of consumer and industrial products to be solely owned by the Company.  AC Kinetics will be the Company’s advanced product developer. AC Kinetics will notify the appropriate technology departments at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) of the Company’s ability and desire to commercialize consumer and industrial products developed in the MIT incubator departments.

The Company and AC Kinetics also entered into a royalty agreement whereby, the Company will receive a 7% Royalty on any licensing revenues received by AC Kinetics for products sold by them.  This royalty agreement will terminate upon receipt by the Company of royalties of $500,000.

The aggregate carrying amount of cost method investments at June 30, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following:

	2013	2012
AC Kinetics Series A Convertible Preferred Stock	$500,000	$0

It was not practicable to estimate fair value of AC Kinetics Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and such an estimate was not made because, during the six months ended June 30, 2013, there were no events or changes in circumstances that could have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of such investments.

24

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General – Capstone Companies, Inc., a Florida corporation, (“CAPC,” “Company,” “we,” or “our”) is a public holding company with its Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share, (“Common Stock”) quoted on the OTCQB system of The OTC Markets Group, Inc. and since July 6, 2012 under the trading symbol “CAPC.”  Prior to July 6, 2012, the Common Stock was quoted on the Bulletin Board of the Over-the-Counter quotation system under the trading symbol “CHDO.OB” and the Company’s name was CHDT Corporation. The Company made a name change by amendment of its charter and changed the trading symbol of its Common Stock by application to FINRA.  This discussion should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Available Information

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are filed with the SEC. Such reports and other information filed by the Company with the SEC are available on the Company’s website at http://www.capstonecompaniesinc.com/Investor Relations and on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The public may read and copy any materials filed by the Company with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549, or through the aforesaid website URL’s. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The contents of these websites are not incorporated into this filing. Further, the Company’s references to the URLs for these websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.

Forward Looking Statements

Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, as well as historical information. The expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements may prove to be incorrect or could change with changing circumstances. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors – many of those factors being beyond our control or ability to predict. Forward-looking statements include those that use forward-looking terminology, such as the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “project,” “plan,” “will,” “shall,” “should,” and similar expressions, including when used in the negative. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable and achievable at the time made, these statements involve risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements.  Actual results may differ significantly from anticipated business and financial results.  The Company is a “penny stock” under Commission rules and the public stock market price for its Common Stock has been depressed for several consecutive fiscal quarters.  The Company’s Common Stock lacks sufficient or active market maker and institutional investor support in the public market and this lack of support, coupled with several fiscal quarters of financial losses, means that any increase in the per share price of our Common Stock in the public market is usually eliminated by selling pressure from profit taking by investors.  As of August 1, 2013, the Common Stock was trading at $.0065 on the Bid Investment in our Common Stock, which is highly risky and should only be considered by investors who can afford to lose their investment and do not require liquidity.  Investors should consider risk factors in this Report and other SEC filings of the Company.

All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by the above and all other applicable factors. We undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, except as required by law, whether to reflect events or circumstances after the date initially filed or published, to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or otherwise.

Introduction

The following discussion and analysis provides an introduction to our company, its current strategy and customers and summarizes the significant factors affecting: (i) our consolidated results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012 and (ii) final liquidity and capital resources.

25

We are a public holding Company organized under the laws of the State of Florida and are a leading designer and manufacturer of specialty power failure lighting solutions and innovator of consumer products for the North American retail markets and, to a lesser extent, Latin American retail markets.  We develop, manufacture and sell a broad range of stylish, innovative and easy to use consumer products including portable booklights, specialty booklights, multi-task lights, multi-function LED power failure lights and night lights, wireless motion sensor lights, power failure wall plates, and door security monitors that are designed to make today’s lifestyles simpler and safer.  Our products are sold under our wholly-owned subsidiary Capstone Industries Inc. brand name.  We seek to deliver strong, consistent business results and superior shareholder returns by providing consumers with products that make their lives simpler and safer.

We oversee the manufacturing of our products, which are all made in China by contract OEM manufacturers, through our three wholly-owned operating subsidiaries: (a) Capstone Industries, Inc., a Florida corporation organized in 1997 and acquired on September 13, 2006 (“Capstone”); (b) Capstone Lighting Technologies, a Florida limited liability Company (“CLTL”).  CLTL has no significant business operations at this time; and  (c) Capstone International (Hong Kong), Ltd., a company organized in 2012 that will support the development of innovative products outside the company’s current categories, provide quality control and logistics support to our factory partners and sell products Internationally from Hong Kong.

Strategy

Our strategy is to develop and maintain positions ofinnovative and technical leadership by periodically introducing new ideas and concepts to our consumer product categories while maintaining low competitive prices.  We plan to leverage any product successes and any expanding channels as our brands continue to gain traction at retail levels by merchandisers, buyers and consumers.  This brand recognition and expanded product placement is expected to continue to increase annual sales growth in 2013.  Toward that end, the Company has initiated a rebranding effort that is intended to enhance its market image further and be more reflective of our emphasis on unique product innovations and technology advancements.  Further to the point of technology advancements and our strategy to continue to nourish the Company’s product development endeavors, the Company has engaged a US company, AC Kinetic Technologies, to confidentially explore and develop certain inventive concepts the Company has conceived that are deemed very complex and that will hopefully yield intellectual property which will distance the companies’ products from off the shelf products commonly marketed at retail.  The Company plans to exploit any resulting trade secret technologies within our own products and also make the technologies available for licensing to other companies that have distributions not currently served by other Capstone related companies.  We also plan to continually seek out and selectively acquire or invest in businesses with superior technical product development capabilities or that could benefit from our leadership position and strategic direction.  All forward planning product development roadmaps are also assessing possible benefits to be realized from U.S. based production

We have extensive experience with introducing new products into retail market channels and believe that provides us a competitive edge against direct competitors.  Four key principles drive the company's business and brand: Innovative; Simplicity; Reliable; and Substantive. Capstone applies emerging technologies for consumer product solutions that are friendly, easy to use and provide consistently dependable performance. Typically, we seek to find product opportunities that may be overlooked or underexploited by competitors, and we believe that we can win a profitable niche of the market share.  We believe these opportunities exist with innovative, aesthetically-pleasing products that include the following characteristics:

·   Designed for an everyday use or task;

·   Affordable, that is we can produce with a reasonable profit within the range of manufacturer’s suggested retail price for such a product;

·   Represent value when compared with items produced or marketed by other consumer product companies on a national scale; and

·   Generates reasonable profit and profit margin opportunity with acceptable market penetration costs.

We believe that it is more economical and efficient to continue to develop and manufacture certain products in China and have them shipped to the United States rather than to have such products produced in North America.  While this resource is available to and used by large numbers of U.S. companies, including our competitors, we believe this Chinese manufacturing resource gives us the level of production cost and quality that allows us to be competitive with larger competitors in the United States and avoid substantial overheads associated with wholly owned manufacturing operations.. However, as design technologies can influence the degree of hand labor in building its future products, the Company expects the advantages it has realized by manufacturing solely in China to be challenged. In these cases, the Company will evaluate production opportunities in the U.S. and expand its production base accordingly should the evaluation prove beneficial and competitive.

26

In Hong Kong, we also have personnel experienced in Engineering and Design, Product Development, International Logistics and Quality Control, who work with our OEM Chinese factories to develop and prototype new product concepts and to ensure products meet Consumer Product Regulations and rigorous Quality Control standards.  All products are tested before and during production by Company personnel. This team also provides extensive, product development, quality control and logistics support to our factory partners to ensure on time shipments.  The Company expanded its staff in Hong Kong and the Company’s relative presence in 2012 as product line extensions and increased number of factories utilized becomes factors.  Moreover, the Hong Kong operation will be offering these same services to companies that do not have existing operations in China or are seeking a more hands on approach with minimal overhead impacts. These services will be offered by contract, more commonly known as a buying agency agreement. These are fee based services and typically average 5-6% of purchases made through our agreement with our Hong Kong operations. As of the date of this Report, the Hong Kong operations have not produced a significant contribution to our financial performance, but we believe that the exploitation of the opportunity represented by our Hong Kong operations will require patience and persistence.

Products and Customers

We seek to be an innovative company in the design and development of a variety of lighting and other products that consumers would typically buy for functional purposes that we design for expanded use as well as aesthetics.  Our current largest selling product group is the Eco-i-Lite power failure light and nightlight program which was further expanded in 2012. This program accounted for 84.8% of our revenues in 2012, 57.7% in 2011, 63.8%, in 2010, and 61.05% of our revenues in 2009.  Our other current products include LED Wall Plate- Night Light, Pathway Lights® book and multi-task lights, Battery Powered Wireless Motion Sensor Lights and Door Security Monitor which was planned as our entry into the security products sector. All of our Capstone Industries branded products are focused on security and safety. We also plan to expand our product line into other growing lighting and security segments, specific to different region and market demands.

We have focused on establishing and growing relationships with numerous leading international, national and regional retailers including but not limited to: Target, Wal-Mart, Sam’s Club, Costco, Brookstone, Office Depot,  The Container Store, True Value, Home Depot and Lowes.  These distribution channels may sell our products through the Internet as well as through retail storefronts and catalogs/mail order.

Our experience in management, operations, and the export business has enabled us to develop the scale, manufacturing efficiencies and design expertise that serves as the foundation for us to aggressively pursue niche product opportunities in the largest consumer markets and growing international market opportunities.  While we have traditionally generated the majority of our sales in the domestic market, urbanization, rising family incomes and increased living standards have spurred demand for small consumer appliances internationally.  In order to capture this market opportunity, we introduced the Capstone Industries brand of power failure lights to Central and South American markets through our master distributor Avtek.  Due to the rate of natural and man-made occurrences resulting in loss of electricity worldwide, we are optimistic about the potential growth rate in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 for our power failure lighting (assuming sufficient marketing support and subject to the response of competitors and key markets). In fact, a key component in the rebranding effort is to create a powerful umbrella identity on the retail package that will serve to rationalize a retail destination within lighting more focused on power failure solutions.

Due to our efforts at innovation and quality manufacturing standards, we believe CAPC is positioned to become a leading manufacturer in the rapidly growing home emergency lighting and security lighting sector and will continue to be a potential leader of power-failure lighting solutions for consumers in our industry segment.  Despite the global recession in 2008, 2009 and 2010, we believe that we were able to maintain our revenue growth because of our ability to deliver products on time, the quality reputation of our products, our business relationships with our retailers and our aggressive expansion in the Americas. Our challenge is to attain better profit margins and attain profitability – either in existing products or new products. Due to the competitive nature of our industry segment, increasing profit margin may be a difficult objective to attain on any sustained basis.

27

Sales and Marketing

Our products are marketed primarily through a direct independent sales force, distributors and wholesalers.  The sales force markets our products through numerous retail locations in certain developed nations, including mass merchandisers, warehouse clubs, food, drug and convenience stores, department stores and hardware centers.  We actively promote our products to retailers and distributors at North American trade shows, but rely on the retail sales channels to advertise our products directly to the end consumer.  Domestically and internationally, the sales teams market our full portfolio of product offerings.  All sales activities at major account levels involved direct company executive staff participation. The Company will also be targeting direct to retail clients through its Capstone International staff for products that fall outside Capstone’s branded categories but are innovative and preferably exclusive to Capstone International. This direct path will allow for broader and faster revenue expansion as product and brand developments are minimized.

Working Capital Requirements

During 2012 the Company made a strategic decision to extend its business model in an effort to expand distribution, so that products could now be offered from our Los Angeles warehouse for US domestic shipments, to such noted retailers as Home Depot, Target, Office Depot, True Value and Wal-Mart for non-promotional periods. This enables retailers to stock our products daily and replenish inventory based on rates of sale in their stores.  This has not only allowed Capstone to add these retailers to its distribution but should help to normalize future business by minimizing the spikes in activity associated with the majority of the Company's business being promotional or seasonal. The first retailers to endorse this domestic program translated to an estimated increase in store count of 4800 outlets. The large backlog that is traditionally evident in the Company for its direct import orders, should be impacted as the business in the domestic distribution program is more evenly spread over the course of the year and orders are generated based on point of sale activity, not in anticipation as is the case on promotions. This program will require carrying a larger amount of inventory and therefore additional funding needs as we ship orders based on retailer weekly or on demand replenishment. As of December 31, 2012,  inventory was $584,370 as compared to $58,717 in fiscal year 2011 and was as high as approximately $850,000 during the fiscal year 2012 to support fourth fiscal quarter holiday business.

For our direct import business model, where title of the shipments transfers overseas when delivered to the dock, we build our products based on firm advance retailer orders upon receipt of a large order.  The Company could have at any point in time within a reporting period a large amount of work in process inventory or finished goods on hand as we complete the order for shipment.  Expansion of both programs will require greater working capital requirements which may be available from existing sources. Our liquidity and cash requirements are discussed more fully below in Liquidity and Capital Resources.

Competitive Conditions

The consumer products and small electronics businesses are highly competitive, both in the United States and on a global basis, as large manufacturers with global operations compete for consumer acceptance and, increasingly, limited retail shelf space. Competition is based upon brand perceptions, product performance, customer service and price.  Social media has a growing impact on consumer response to products and brands.

Our principal lighting competitors in the U.S. are General Electric (Jasco), Energizer, Sylvania, Zelco and Lightwedge, LLC. We believe private-label sales by large retailers has some impact on the market in some parts of the world as many national retailers such as Target, Wal-Mart, Home Depot, and Costco offer lighting as part of their private branded product lines.

With trends and technology continually changing, we will continue to invest and seek to rapidly develop new products at that are competitively priced with unique features and benefits easily articulated to the end user.  Success in the markets we serve depends upon product innovation, pricing, retailer support, responsiveness, and cost management.  We continue to invest in developing the technologies and design critical to competing in our markets as evidenced by our recent engagement of AC Kinetic Technologies.  We intend to pursue similar joint ventures.  There can be no assurance that any of these cooperative efforts will improve our financial or business performance.

28

Raw Materials

The principal raw materials used by us are sourced in China, as we manufacture our products exclusively through contract manufacturers in the region.  Although prices of materials have fluctuated over time, We believe that adequate supplies of raw materials required for its operations are available at the present time.  We, of course, cannot predict the future availability or prices of such materials.  These raw materials are generally available from a number of different sources, and the prices of those raw materials are susceptible to currency fluctuations and price fluctuations due to transportation, government regulations, price controls, economic climate, or other unforeseen circumstances.  In the past, we have not experienced any significant interruption in availability of raw materials.  We believe we have extensive experience in manufacturing and have taken positions to assure supply and to protect margins on anticipated sales volume.

Prior History:

Prior to the acquisition of Capstone Industries, Inc., we experienced a high turnover in management and business lines.  We have sought to avoid the problems of the past and recruited an experienced management and sales team for the stated purpose to develop and expand our consumer products business.  We believe that this investment in corporate infrastructure was necessary to lay the foundation for any hope of future success and effective business and product development.  While we are not certain our current strategy and business lines will produce sustained future profitability or any growth, we believe that the current strategy and business line is the best approach for our current management team and available resources and, in our opinion, the most likely path to any hope of sustained future profitability or any growth.2011 has proven to be our best performing year since 2007 and is our first profitable year.  Our board of directors continues to review alternate business strategies, which may include sale of an existing business line, acquisition of new product lines, and merger and/or acquisition transaction with other companies.

CONSOLIDATED OVERVIEW OF OPERATIONS

Revenue

For the 3 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, total net sales were approximately $1,027,100 and $849,000 respectively, an increase of $178,100 or 21 % from the previous year.

For the 6 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, total net sales were approximately $1,686,900 and $1,187,700 respectively, an increase of $499,200 or 42% higher than 2012.

Cost of Sales

For the 3 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, Cost of Sales were approximately $830,200 and $661,900 respectively, an increase of $168,300 or 25.4 % from the previous year.

For the 6 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, Cost of Sales were approximately $1,296,100 and $892,700 respectively, an increase of $403,400 or 45.2 % higher than 2012 resulting from the increased volume.

Gross Profit

For the 3 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, gross profit was approximately $196,900 and $ 187,100 respectively, an increase of $9,800 or 5.2% as compared to the comparable period in 2012.

For the 6 months ended June 30th, 2013 and 2012, gross profit was $390,800 and $295,000 respectively, an increase of $95,800 or 32.5% from the same period last year.

The significant increase in revenue is attributed to the availability of the domestic inventory program.  The $95,800 Gross Profit increase over 2012 was the result of the higher revenue.  As a percentage of net sales, Gross Profit for the 6 months June 30, 2013 and 2012 was 23.2% and 24.8% respectively.  In the 2nd quarter we provided a $92,000 special marketing allowance to promote our Eco-i-Lite product which reduced the overall Gross Profit.  However if we eliminate the impact of this once off allowance, our Gross Profit % to Sales would be trending at 28.8% for the period significantly higher than in 2012.

The revenue and gross profit, increased significantly over the previous year, however the Company’s loss also increased as a result of increased operating expenses and interest charges.  So it important to understand the reasons for the expense increase as many of the expenditures are investments for future revenue growth.

Operating Expenses

For the 3 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, operating expenses were approximately $614,300 and $490,600 respectively, an increase of $123,700 or 25.2% as compared to same period in 2012.

29

For the 6 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, operating expenses were $1,120,400 and 914,800 respectively an increase of $205,600 or 22.5%

During this 6 month period, expenses increased in various categories.  The following summarizes the major expense increases over 2012 that incurred during the period.

Sales and Marketing expenses - for the 6 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $166,600 and $119,800 respectively, an increase of $46,800 or 39.1%.  During the period we expensed approximately $28k in the new FIFA World Cup watch program that will generate revenues in third and fourth fiscal quarters of 2013 and first and second fiscal quarters of 2014.  With the increase of domestic shipments as compared to fiscal 2012, warehouse shipping and handling costs were $11,400 higher than last year but we also had increased Revenue to offset this expense increase.  We also incurred $10,700 higher in marketing expenses over 2012 as we launched new products this year such as the LED Wall Plate.

Compensation Expense -for the 6 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $468,800 and $444,500 respectively, an increase of $24,300 or 5.5% resulting from planned executive increases and one additional support staff.

Professional fees for the 6 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $205,500 and $100,900 respectively, an increase of $104,600 or 103.7%.  During the period we significantly increased expenditures in outside services relating to rebranding of our product lines, website development, product development and overseas sourcing. The additional Hong Kong support staffs are currently compensated as consultants

Product Development for the 6 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $84,000 and $91,900 respectively, that’s a reduction of $7,900 or 8.6%.  This reduction is mainly the result of some product development fees now being classified as Professional fees

Other General Administrative for the 6 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $195,600 and $157,700 respectively, an increase of $37,900 or 24.0%.  As a result of new product molds and new product artwork, equipment depreciation and packaging amortization expense was $19,600 higher than 2012.  Travel and Lodging expenses also increased by approximately $8,100 because of additional sales trips over the period.

Interest Expense

For the 3 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, interest expenses were approximately $81,400 and $57,100 respectively, that’s an increase of $24,300 as compared to same period in 2012.

For the 6 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, interest expenses were $155,100 and 89,000 respectively an increase of $66,100.  The higher interest expense is the result of financing approximately $550,000 of domestic inventory and purchase order funding for new orders.

Net Income (Loss)

For the 3 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had a net loss of approximately $498,800 as compared with a net loss in the same period last year of $360,600, an increased net loss of $138,200.

For the 6 months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had a net loss of approximately $884,700 as compared with a net loss in the same period last year of $708,800 an increased net loss of $175,900 compared with the same period last year.

With the current retail interest in our product offerings, expansion of distribution channels through the domestic purchase program, the launch of exciting new products this year and the opportunities provided by Capstone International HK Ltd, the Company expects its sales volumes to grow and produce revenue in the range of $15 million to $20 million within the next rolling 12 months, subject to economic conditions not deteriorating.  The company anticipates this growth potential as a result of the increased retail distribution achieved in 2013, the rebranding of Capstone’s Power Failure Product line and the new product launched at the National Hardware Show in May of 2013.  Having attended for the first time last year, the International Hotel, Motel and Restaurant Show we are actively pursuing opportunities with our Power Failure Solutions products and Door Security Monitor in this new distribution channel.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material future effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

30

Contractual Obligations

The following table represents contractual obligations as of June 30, 2013:

	Payments Due by Period
	Total		2013		2014		2015		After 2015
(In thousands)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses	$	516	$	516	$	-	$	-	$	-
Short-Term Debt		4,971		450		4,521		-		-
Long-Term Debt		0		0		0		-		-
Operating Leases		83		28		55		-		-
Other Long-Term Liabilities		-		-		-		-		-
Total Contractual Obligations	$	5,570	$	994	$	4,576	$	-	$	-

Notes to Contractual Obligations Table

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses — Includes purchase obligations comprised of the Company’s commitments for products that purchased to fulfill customer orders and for warehouse goods and other services in the normal course of business. The purchase obligation for products reflects the Company’s obligation to pay for finished product that has been delivered and title has transferred to the Company.

Note Payable and Long-Term Debt — See Notes 3 and 4 in the Financial Statements in this report.

Operating Leases — Operating lease obligations are primarily related to facility leases for our operations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

	6 Months			6 Months
	June 30, 2013			June 30, 2012
(In thousands)
Net cash provided (used) by:
Operating Activities	$	(281)		$	(1,228)
Investing Activities		(507	)		(2	)
Financing Activities		1,005			1,292

Our limited borrowing capacity and our cash flow from operations provide us with the financial resources needed to run our operations and reinvest in our business.

Operating Activities

Net Cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $280,900 in 2013 compared with approximately $1,227,800 in the prior year.  During the period we collected $1,626,300 in cash from outstanding Accounts Receivable, reduced Accounts Payable by $598,100, deposited $614,700 towards third quarter order purchases and covered our net loss to date of $884,700.  Our cash flow from operations is primarily dependent on our net income adjusted for non-cash expenses and the timing of collections of receivables, level of inventory and payments to suppliers.  Sales are influenced significantly by the build rates of products, which are subject to general economic conditions and review calendars at retail levels.

Cash used for investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately ($507,200) and ($2,400) respectively.  Cash used in investing activities is primarily for capital expenditures to expand design and production capacity. In this period, Company directors loaned the Company $500,000 to invest in AC Kinetics, a technology based company that will support the Company’s need to develop innovative products.  AC Kinetics’ team of scientists and engineer MIT PhD's, have invented and commercialized electro- mechanical breakthroughs for over 30 years.  Their technologies are on machines world-wide ranging from space satellites to computer disk drives. They are working on new power failure technologies as well as other unique hi-tech consumer products for Capstone to market.  Our expectation for 2013 is that we will invest up to $200,000 in new equipment and molds.  Future capital requirements depend on numerous factors, including expansion of existing product lines and introduction of new products.  Management believes that our cash flow from operations and current borrowing sources will provide for these necessary capital expenditures.

31

Financing Activities

Our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity is highly dependent upon achieving expected operating results.  Failure to achieve expected operating results could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, our ability to obtain financing and our operations in the future.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants pursuant to existing credit facilities.  The Company’s cash needs for working capital, debt service and capital equipment during 2013 are expected to be met by cash flows from operations and cash balances, the existing bank loan facility and if necessary additional notes payable funding from established sources.  In order to further facilitate Company growth and investment in new product development and inventories, on April 1st. 2012, the Company obtained a Working Capital Revolving Line of Credit for up to $1,000,000 from Postal Capital Funding, LLC owned by Jeffrey Postal, a director, and James McClinton, a director and senior officer of the Company.

Directors & Officers Insurance: We currently operate with directors’ and officers’ insurance and we believe our coverage is adequate to cover likely liabilities under such a policy.

Impact of Inflation: Our major expenses have been the cost of selling and marketing product lines to customers in North America.  That effort involves mostly sales staff traveling to make direct marketing and sales pitches to customers and potential customers trade shows around North America and visiting China to maintain and seek to expand distribution and manufacturing relationships and channels.  As a result of world economic conditions and the current price of world oil and resulting increased material costs, there are now pressures from Chinese Manufacturers to increase costs.  We generally have been able to reduce cost increases by strong negotiating, volume purchases or re-engineering products, but may have to increase the price of our products in fiscal year 2013 in response to such inflationary pressures and any dollar currency depreciation with the Chinese currency.  Since we operate in industries where the consumer tends to be price sensitive, any such increase in the prices of our products may adversely impact our sales and financial results in fiscal year 2013.

Country Risks- Changes in foreign, cultural, political and financial market conditions could impair Capstones international manufacturing operations and financial performance.

Capstone’s manufacturing is currently conducted in China.  Consequently, Capstone is subject to a number of significant risks associated with manufacturing business in China, including:

·   the possibility of expropriation, confiscatory taxation or price controls;

·   adverse changes in local investment or exchange control regulations;

·   political or economic instability, government nationalization of business or industries, government corruption, and civil unrest;

·   legal and regulatory constraints;

·   tariffs and other trade barriers; and

·   difficulty in enforcing contractual and intellectual property rights.

Currency- Currency fluctuations may significantly increase our expenses and affect the results of operations, especially where the currency is subject to intense political and other outside pressure.

All of our sales in the first six months ending June 30, 2013 and in fiscal 2012 were transacted in U.S. dollars, and the weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies can negatively impact our operating profits, through higher unit costs. However, as the company volumes continue to increase the leveraged buying power has enabled the Company to minimize the impact on costs.  The recent economic crises revealed that exchange rates can be highly volatile.  Changes in currency exchange rates may also affect the relative prices at which we and our competitors sell products in the same market.  There can be no assurance that the U.S. dollar foreign exchange rates will be stable in the future or that fluctuations in such rates will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Interest Rate Risk- We do not have significant interest rate risk during the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2013.

Credit Risk- We have not experienced significant credit risk, as most of our customers are long-term customers with superior payment records.  Our managers monitor our receivables regularly and our Direct Import Programs are shipped to only the most financially stable customers or advance payments before shipment are required for those accounts less financially secured.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable.

32

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.  We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commissionrules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and we necessarily are required to apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures.

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2013 and concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act and as of June 30, 2013, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Commission regulations and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Item 4(T).  Controls and Procedures.

Changes in internal controls.  There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the three months covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

The certifications of our chief executive officer and chief financial officers attached as Exhibits 31.1 and to this Report include information concerning our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Such certifications should be read in conjunction with the information contained in Item 4, including the information incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, for a more complete understanding of the matters covered by such certifications.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.

We are not a party to any material pending or threatened legal proceedings and, to the best our knowledge, no such action by or against us has been threatened.  From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business.  Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur in such routine lawsuits, we believe that the final disposition of such routine lawsuits will not have material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or status as a going concern.

Other Legal Matters.  To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors, officers or owners of record of more than five percent (5%) of the securities of the Company, or any associate of any such director, officer or security holder is a party adverse to us or has a material interest adverse to us in reference to pending litigation.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

In addition to risk factors set forth herein and in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, and other Commission filings, the following risk factors should be considered in any evaluation of the Company.

Investment in new business strategies and marketing and sales strategies could present risks not originally contemplated.  The Company has invested, and in the future may invest, in new business strategies or marketing and sales strategies.  Such endeavors may involve significant risks and uncertainties, including insufficient revenue to offset liabilities assumed and expenses associated with the strategy, inadequate return of capital, and unidentified issues not discovered in the Company’s evaluation. These new strategies may be inherently risky and may not be successful.

33

Company relies on equity or debt funding from members of management or outside investors from time to time to meet working capital needs.  Company receives equity or debt funding from time to time from members of management or outside investors to fund working capital needs.  Such funding may not always be available or adequate to meet such essential needs.  The lack of primary market makers and institutional investors for our publicly traded common stock makes it difficult for the Company’s common stock to appreciate in value, which, in turn, makes it difficult for the Company to raise money from outside investors or in the public markets. We believe that we need to develop new products or new product lines with higher profit margins to attain better financial results and, through any improved financial results, to possibly attract greater support for our Common Stock in the public markets.  We believe that greater market support for our Common Stock would assist in any efforts to raise working capital by the Company. We may be unable to develop higher profit margin products or achieve or sustain profitability and that failure would probably result in the aforementioned weakness in the public market for our Common Stock.

Company competes against larger competitors with greater resources and market share and recognition. The Company is relatively small in comparison to larger competitors with superior financial and technical resources and greater market recognition and market share in certain product categories.  This discrepancy in resources and market share makes it difficult for our company to attain a larger market share in certain regions or in certain product categories.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

There were no unregistered issuances of Company securities in the quarter ending June 30, 2013.

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders

As of June 30, 2013, there have been no submissions of matters to vote at a regular or special shareholders meeting

Item 5.  Other Information

None.

Item 6.  Exhibits

EXHIBIT #	DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
3.1	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated December 10, 2012^
31.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Stewart Wallach, Chief Executive Officer^
31.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Gerry McClinton, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer^
32.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Stewart Wallach, Chief Executive Officer. ^
32.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Gerry McClinton, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer^

------------------------------------------

^ Filed herein.

34

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Capstone Companies, Inc. has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Broward County, Florida on this 13th day of August, 2013.

Capstone Companies, Inc.

Dated:    August 13, 2013

/s/Stewart Wallach
Stewart Wallach	Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
/s/Gerry McClinton
Gerry McClinton	Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Operations Executive	Chief Operating Officer

35

EX-3.1

EX-31.1

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Section 302 Certifications

I, Gerry McClinton, certify that:

1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on form 10-Q of Capstone Companies, Inc (formerly CHDT Corporation);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)           Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2013

/s/ Gerry McClinton

Gerry McClinton,

Chief Financial Officer,

Chief Operating Officer, Director

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capstone Companies, Inc formerly (CHDT Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stewart Wallach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Stewart Wallach

Stewart Wallach

CEO, Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

August 13, 2013

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capstone Companies, Inc formerly (CHDT Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gerry McClinton, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gerry McClinton

Gerry McClinton

Chief Operating Officer, Director

(Principal Operations Executive)

August 13, 2013

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE (Tables)

Major Customers

The Company had three customers who comprised at least ten percent (10%) of gross revenue during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.  The loss of these customers would adversely impact the business of the Company.  The percentage of gross revenue and the accounts receivable from each of these customers is as follows:

	Gross Revenue %			Accounts Receivable
	2012	2011		2012		2011
Customer A	60%	55%	$	2,208,495	$	1,014,690
Customer B	10%	19%		464,601		488,468
Customer C	12%	13%		35,435		0
	82%	87%	$	2,708,531	$	1,503,158

Major Vendors

The Company had two vendors from which it purchased at least ten percent (10%) of merchandise during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The loss of these suppliers would adversely impact the business of the Company.  The percentage of purchases, and the related accounts payable from each of these vendors is as follows:

	Purchases %			Accounts Payable
	2012	2011		2012		2011
Vendor A	81%	62%	$	818,883	$	291,350
Vendor B	13%	35%		28,834		350
	94%	97%	$	847,717	$	291,700

XML

Stock Transactions options granted vested (Details) (USD $)	Jul. 31, 2009	May 23, 2008	May 01, 2008	Apr. 23, 2007
Stock Transactions options granted vested
Stock options granted to CEO as incentive compensation				102,400,000
Exercise price of stock options granted to CEO				$ 0.029
Stock options cancelled		74,666,667	850,000
Fully vested options and fully expensed options were amended and transferred to G. McClinton	5,000,000
Stock options granted to COO and Secretary as incentive compensation				28,100,000
Exercise price of stock options granted to COO and Secretary				$ 0.029
Shares of S. Wallach fully vested and fully expensed options were amended and transferred to G. McClinton.	5,000,000

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
REVENUES
Revenues	$ 1,027,121	$ 848,990	$ 1,686,916	$ 1,187,660
Cost of Sales	(830,174)	(661,873)	(1,296,127)	(892,660)
Gross Profit	196,947	187,117	390,789	295,000
Operating Expenses:
Sales and marketing	109,297	70,586	166,610	119,774
Compensation	238,693	224,424	468,787	444,504
Professional fees	113,733	53,555	205,457	100,878
Product Development	60,387	64,778	84,006	91,880
Other general and administrative	92,207	77,295	195,575	157,729
Total Operating Expenses	614,317	490,638	1,120,435	914,765
Net Operating Income (Loss)	(417,370)	(303,521)	(729,646)	(619,765)
Other Income (Expense):
Interest expense	(81,381)	(57,058)	(155,085)	(88,989)
Total Other Income (Expense)	(81,381)	(57,058)	(155,085)	(88,989)
Net Income (Loss)	$ (498,751)	$ (360,579)	$ (884,731)	$ (708,754)
Income (Loss) per Common Share	$ 0.00	$ 0.00	$ 0.00	$ 0.00
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
Basic	657,760,532	649,510,532	657,242,576	649,510,532

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

On June 29, 2007, the Company relocated its principal executive offices and sole operations facility to 350 Jim Moran Blvd., Suite 120, Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442, which is located in Broward County.  This space consists of 4,000 square rentable feet and is leased on a month to month basis.  Monthly payments are approximately $4,650 per month.

Rental expense under these leases was approximately $27,935 and $28,222 for the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Employment Agreements

On February 5, 2008, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Stewart Wallach, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, whereby Mr. Wallach will be paid $225,000 per annum.  As part of the agreement, Mr. Wallach will receive a minimum increase of 5% per year.  For 2009, Mr. Wallach was paid $236,250, and for 2010 Mr. Wallach was paid $175,412.  For 2011 Mr. Wallach was paid was paid $180,000 and for 2012 he was paid $260,033.  An amount of $40,233 has been accrued and is included on the balance sheet as part of accounts payable and accrued expenses for deferred wages in 2011.  This balance remains unpaid at December 31, 2012 and continues to be reported as part of accounts payable and accrued expenses.  The term of the contract begins February 5, 2008 and ends on February 5, 2011, but the term of the contract was extended for a further two years through February 5, 2013.  The Compensation Committee has further extended the agreement with the same terms for a further two years through February 5, 2015.

On February 5, 2008, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Gerry McClinton, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, whereby Mr. McClinton will be paid $150,000 per annum.  As part of the agreement, Mr. McClinton will receive a minimum increase of 5% per year.  For 2009, Mr. McClinton was paid $157,500 and for 2010 Mr. McClinton was paid $113,546. For 2011, Mr McClinton was paid $146,250 and for 2012 he was paid $187,000.  An amount of $572 has been accrued and is included on the balance sheet as part of accounts payable and accrued expenses for deferred wages in 2011.  This balance remains unpaid at December 31, 2012 and continues to be reported as part of accounts payable and accrued expenses.  The term of the contract begins February 5, 2008 and ends on February 5, 2011 but the term of the contract was extended for a further two years through February 5, 2013. The Compensation Committee has further extended the agreement with the same terms for a further two years through February 5, 2015.

On February 5, 2008, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Howard Ullman, the Chairman of Board of Directors of the Company, whereby Mr. Ullman will be paid $100,000 per annum. For 2010 Mr. Ullman was paid $73,444. The term of the contract began February 5, 2008 and ended on February 5, 2011 and was been extended until June 30, 2011.  As of July 1st 2011 Mr. Ullman is no longer an employee of the Company.

XML

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenses (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Significant Accounting Policies Expenses
Depreciation recorded for the period	$ 30,868	$ 17,454
Shipping and Handling Costs.	56,954	50,587
Stock based compensationfor the period	20,250	16,500
Advertising and promotion expenses	53,699	56,480
Capitalized advertising costs included in prepaid expenses	$ 275,019

XML

Stock Transactions options granted to directors (Details)	Aug. 06, 2012	Jul. 02, 2011	Apr. 23, 2010
Stock Transactions options granted to directors and secretary
Stock Transactions Option granted to four Directors.	4,500,000	4,500,000	4,500,000
Stock Transactions Options granted to Company Secretary.	150,000	150,000	300,000
Vest period for options (in years).	1	1	1

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES (Tables)

Notes and Loans Payable to Related Parties Maturities

The total amount payable to officers, directors and related parties as of June 30, 2013 was 4,674,764 including accrued interest of $276,335.  The maturities under the notes and loan payable to related parties for the next five years are:

Year Ended December, 31,
2013	$	152,729
2014		4,522,035
2015		-
2016		-
2017		-
Total future maturities		4,674,764

XML

Stock Transactions Warrants issued (Details) (USD $)	1 Months Ended	2 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2003	Oct. 31, 2007
Stock warrants issued
Stock warrants issued to former officer	10,000
Stock warrants issued to another former officer	25,000
Stock warrants issued at an exercise price	$ 0.05
Issuance of shares of common stock as part of a private placement		31,823,529
Per share value of shares of common stock as part of a private placement		$ 0.017
Value of shares as part of private placement		$ 541,000
Total warrants were issued	35,000	9,548,819
Warrants term (in years)		10
Warrants exercise price		$ 0.025
Right of warrant to purchase fixed % of the shares in the Private Placement	30.00%

XML

Stock Transactions Recognized compensation expenses (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Stock Transactions Recognized compensation expenses
Recognized compensation expenses	$ 20,250	$ 20,250

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Purchase Order Assignment- Funding Agreements (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended				12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Purchase Order Assignment- Funding Agreements
Loan from George Wolf	$ 303,058	$ 233,400	$ 0	$ 432,000	$ 0
Loan from Jeffrey Postal	0	0	0	746,000	602,148
Loan from Phyllis Postal	0	0	150,000	375,000	0
Interest rate on Funding Agreements:	1.00%	1.00%	1.00%	1.00%	1.00%
Interest Amount due	3,058	8,400	0		27,148
Repayment of loan from Phyllis Postal		0	200,000
Loan from Everett Fleisig		$ 0	$ 220,000
Interest rate on Loan from Everett Fleisig:		0.00%	1.00%

XML

Organization And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Stock Options granted (Details)	Jun. 30, 2013	Jul. 02, 2011	Apr. 23, 2010	Jun. 08, 2009	May 01, 2008	Feb. 05, 2008
Organization And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Stock Options granted
Stock Options granted to four Directors And an Employee						3,650,000
Stock options vest period (in years)		1	1	1	2	2
Stock Options granted to an employee					850,000
Stock Options granted to four Directors				4,500,000
Stock Options granted to four Directors and Company secretary	4,650,000	4,650,000	4,800,000

XML

Organization And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Compensation Expense (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended					24 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009	Dec. 31, 2008	Dec. 31, 2007	Dec. 31, 2009
Organization And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Recognized Compensation Expense
Recognized compensation expense	$ 52,186	$ 156,558	$ 156,557	$ 405,198	$ 503,075
Recognized compensation expense on options granted to employees			10,869	25,131	29,214
Shares cancelled of the options granted to employees						1,500,000
Recognized compensation expense on options granted to business associate			6,648	7,978	1,330
Recognized compensation expense on options granted to advisor				$ 19,953

XML

Stock Transactions Preferred Stock (Details) (USD $)	Jul. 09, 2009
Stock Transactions Preferred Stock
Series C Preferred Stock shares authorized and issued	1,000
Value of Series C Preferred stock shares issued	$ 700,000
Series C Shares 1000 are convertible into common stock shares	67,979,725
Series C Preferred stock par value	$ 1.00

XML

Total amount payable on the reassigned notes (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Total amount payable on the reassigned notes
Notes Payable to Stewart Wallach		$ 233,256
Accrued Interest on Notes Payable to Stewart Wallach		23,783
Notes Payable to JWTR Holdings; LLC		233,256
Accrued Interest onNotes Payable to JWTR Holdings; LLC		23,783
Total combined balance due on two notes	483,132
Total combined accrued interest	$ 64,186

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Working Capital Loan Agreements (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Apr. 02, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Working Capital Loan Agreements
Maximum amount may be borrowed by comany		$ 1,000,000
Interest rates		8.00%
Loan balance	521,548		382,310
Interest amount included in loan	23,548		7,310
Additional loan received from co	$ 123,000

XML

Stock Transactions Options (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2009	Dec. 31, 2008	Dec. 31, 2005
Stock Transactions Options
Available shares for issuance of common stock			10,000,000
Stock options cancelled prior to vesting (options granted to five employees)		1,000,000
Compensation expense recognized,	$ 10,869	$ 25,131

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Officers And Directors (Details) (USD $)	May 30, 2007
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Officers And Directors
Promissory note payable to director	$ 575,000
Accrued interest rate	8.00%
Series B Preferred stock issued	12,704
Series B Preferred stock valued	$ 28,975

XML

COST METHOD INVESTMENTS (DETAILS) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
COST METHOD INVESTMENTS {2}
AC Kinetics Series A Convertible Preferred Stock	$ 500,000	$ 0

XML

Amortization expense (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Amortization expense
Amortization expenses for the year	$ 14,538	$ 8,356

XML

LEASES Principal Executive Offices (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 29, 2007
LEASES Principal Executive Offices
Rental space area	4,000
Monthly lease rental payments	$ 4,650

XML

Organization And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Options Granted (Details)	May 23, 2008	May 01, 2008	Jan. 10, 2008	Oct. 22, 2007	May 01, 2007	Apr. 23, 2007
Organization And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Options Granted
Stock options granted to officers and employees					4,000,000	130,500,000
Options vest percentage						20.00%
Stock Options Canceled	74,666,667	850,000
Options vest period (in years)			1	2	2
Stock options granted to a business associate				700,000
Stock options granted to an advisor			1,000,000

XML

ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of accounting policies for Capstone Companies, Inc. (“CAPC”), a Florida corporation (formerly, “CHDT Corporation”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“Subsidiaries”) is presented to assist in understanding the Company's financial statements.  The accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements

Interim Financial Statements

The unaudited financial statements as of June 30, 2013 and for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the financial position and results of operations for the three months.  Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results which can be expected for full years.

Organization and Basis of Presentation

CAPC was initially incorporated September 18, 1986 under the laws of the State of Delaware under the name "Yorkshire Leveraged Group, Incorporated", and then changed its domicile to Colorado in 1989 by merging into a Colorado corporation, named "Freedom Funding, Inc." Freedom Funding, Inc. then changed its name to "CBQ, Inc." by amendment of its Articles of Incorporation on November 25, 1998. In May 2004, the Company changed its name from “CBQ, Inc.” to “China Direct Trading Corporation” as part of a reincorporation from the State of Colorado to the State of Florida.  On May 7, 2007, the Company amended its charter to change its name from “China Direct Trading Corporation” to “CHDT Corporation.”  This name change was effective as of July 16, 2007 for purposes of the change of its name on the OTC Bulletin Board.   With the name change, the trading symbol was changed to “CHDO.” On June 6, 2012, the Company amended its charter to change its name from “CHDT Corporation” to “CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC.”  This name change was effective as of July 6, 2012 for purposes of the change of its name on the OTC Bulletin Board.   With the name change, the trading symbol was changed to “CAPC.”

In February 2004, the Company established a new subsidiary, initially named “China Pathfinder Fund, L.L.C.”, a Florida limited liability company. During 2005, the name was changed to “Overseas Building Supply, LLC” (“OBS”) to reflect its shift in business lines from business development consulting services in China for North American companies to trading Chinese-made building supplies in South Florida.  This business line was ended in fiscal year 2007 and OBS name was changed to “Black Box Innovations, L.L.C.” (“BBI”) on March 20, 2008. On January 31, 2012 “BBI” name was changed to “Capstone Lighting Technologies, L.L.C” (“CLT”).

On January 27, 2006, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Complete Power Solutions ("CPS") to acquire 51% of the member interests of CPS. CPS was organized by William Dato on September 20, 2004, as a Florida limited Liability Company to distribute power generators in Florida and adjacent states.  The Company subsequently sold its 51% membership interest in CPS, pursuant to a Purchase and Settlement Agreement dated and effective as of December 31, 2006.

On September 13, 2006 the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Capstone Industries, Inc., a Florida corporation (Capstone).  Capstone was incorporated in Florida on May 15, 1996 and is engaged primarily in the business of wholesaling low technology consumer products to distributors and retailers in the United States.  Under the Stock Purchase Agreement the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Capstone Common Stock, and recorded goodwill of $1,936,020.

On April 13, 2012 , the Company established a wholly owned subsidiary in Hong Kong, named “ Capstone International Hong Kong Ltd” (CIHK) which will be engaged in selling the Companies products Internationally and will provide other services such as, new product development, product sourcing, quality control, ocean freight logistics, product testing and factory certifications for the Companies other subsidiaries.

Nature of Business

Since the beginning of fiscal year 2007, the Company has been primarily engaged in the business of developing, marketing and selling consumer products through national and regional retailers and distributors, in North America.  Capstone currently operates in four primary business segments: Induction Charged Power Failure Lights, Motion Sensor Lights, Portable Book and Task Lights and Door Security Monitor.  The Company’s products are typically manufactured in the Peoples’ Republic of China by third-party manufacturing companies.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents, to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

An allowance for doubtful accounts is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for bad debts charged to earnings.  The allowance for bad debt is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the receivables.  This evaluation is inherently subjective and requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available.

As of June 30, 2013, management has determined that the accounts receivable are fully collectible.  As such, management has not recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts.

Inventory

The Company's inventory, which is recorded at lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market, consists of finished goods for resale by Capstone, totaling $546,705 and $584,370 at June 30 , 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Property and Equipment

Fixed assets are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated economic useful lives of the related assets as follows:

Computer equipment	3 - 7 years
Computer software	3 - 7 years
Machinery and equipment	3 - 7 years
Furniture and fixtures	3 - 7 years

Long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable.  When required, impairment losses on assets to be held and used are recognized based on the fair value of the asset.  Long-lived assets to be disposed of, if any, are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.  No impairments were recognized by the Company during 2013 or through December 31, 2012.

Upon sale or other disposition of property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in the determination of income or loss.

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Major overhauls and betterments are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated economic useful lives.

Depreciation expense was $30,868 and $ 17,454  for the period ended June 30 , 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets acquired, either individually or with a group of other assets (but not those acquired in a business combination), are initially recognized and measured based on fair value.  Goodwill acquired in business combinations is initially computed as the amount paid by the acquiring company in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired.

The cost of internally developing, maintaining and restoring intangible assets (including goodwill) that are not specifically identifiable, that have indeterminate lives, or that are inherent in a continuing business and related to an entity as a whole, are recognized as an expense when incurred.

An intangible asset (excluding goodwill) with a definite useful life is amortized; an intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is not amortized until its useful life is determined to be no longer indefinite.  The remaining useful lives of intangible assets not being amortized are evaluated at least annually to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.

If and when an intangible asset is determined to no longer have an indefinite useful life, the asset shall then be amortized prospectively over its estimated remaining useful life and accounted for in the same manner as other intangibles that are subject to amortization.

An intangible asset (including goodwill) that is not subject to amortization shall be tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.  The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible assets with its carrying amount.  If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.  Goodwill is not amortized.

It is the Company's policy to test for impairment no less than annually, or when conditions occur that may indicate impairment.  The Company's intangible assets, which consist of goodwill of $1,936,020 recorded in connection with the Capstone acquisition, were tested for impairment and determined that no adjustment for impairment was necessary as of December 31, 2012, whereas the fair value of the intangible asset exceeds its carrying amount.

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share were computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year.  In periods where losses are reported, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.  At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the total number of potentially dilutive common stock equivalents was 159,946,577 and 155,446,577 respectively.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 include the accounts of the parent entity and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Capstone Lighting Technologies, L.L.C (formerly Black Box Innovations, L.L.C.), Capstone Industries, Inc. and Capstone International HK, LTD.

The results of operations attributable to subsidiaries are included in the consolidated results of operations beginning on the date on which the Company’s interest in a subsidiary was acquired.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of the Company's financial instruments, including cash, prepaid expenses, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities at June 30, 2013 and 2012 approximates their fair values due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The fair value hierarchy under GAAP distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:

·   Level one — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

·   Level two — Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

·   Level three — Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter.

Cost Method of Accounting for Investment

Investments in equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values and do not qualify for consolidation or the equity method are carried at cost.  Dividends received from those companies are included in other income.  Dividends received in excess of the Company’s proportionate share of accumulated earnings are applied as a reduction of the cost of the investment.  Other than temporary impairments to fair value are charged against current period income.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in the 2012 financial statements to conform to the 2013 presentation.  There were no material changes in classifications made to previously issued financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Product sales are recognized when an agreement of sale exists, product delivery has occurred, pricing is final or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.

Allowances for sales returns, rebates and discounts are recorded as a component of net sales in the period the allowances are recognized.  In addition, accrued liabilities contained in the accompanying balance sheet include accruals for estimated amounts of credits to be issued in future years based on potentially defective product, other product returns and various allowances.  These estimates could change significantly in the near term.

Advertising and Promotion

Advertising and promotion costs, including advertising, public relations, and trade show expenses, are expensed as incurred and included in Sales and Marketing expenses.  Advertising and promotion expense was $53,699and $ 56,480 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of June 30, 2013 the company has $275,019 in capitalized advertising costs included in prepaid expenses on the balance sheet.

Shipping and Handling

The Company’s shipping and handling costs, are included in sales and marketing expenses and amounted to $56,954 and $50,587 for the six months ended June  30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities contained in the accompanying balance sheet include accruals for estimated amounts of credits to be issued in future years based on potentially defective products, other product returns and various allowances.  These estimates could change significantly in the near term.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 109 (SFAS 109), "Accounting for Income Taxes." SFAS 109 (now ASC 740) requires recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences, based on enacted tax laws, of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company and its subsidiaries intend to file consolidated income tax returns.

Stock-Based Compensation

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payments, SFAS 123(R), (now ASC 718) which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options, based on estimated fair values.  ASC 718 supersedes the Company’s previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations, applied for periods through December 31, 2005.  In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) relating to ASC 718.  The Company has applied the provision of SAB 107 in its adoption of ASC 718.

The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective application transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006, the first day of the Company’s fiscal year.  The Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and later, reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R).  In accordance with the modified prospective method, the Company’s consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123(R).

SFAS 123(R) ASC 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of the grant using an option-pricing model.  The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expenses over the requisite service periods in the Company’s consolidated statements of income (loss).  Prior to the adoption of ASC 718, the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB 25, as allowed under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (SFAS 123).  Under the intrinsic value method, compensation expense under fixed term option plans was recorded at the date of grant only to the extent that the market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant exceeded the exercise price.  Accordingly, for those stock options granted for which the exercise price equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant, no expense was recorded.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period.  There was no stock-based compensation expense attributable to options for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not vested as of December 31, 2005.  Such stock-based compensation is based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS 123.  Compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, are based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718.

In conjunction with the adoption of ASC 718, the Company adopted the straight-line single option method of attributing the value of stock-based compensation expense.  As stock-based compensation expense is recognized during the period is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it is subject to reduction for estimated forfeitures.  ASC 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.  As of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, there were no material amounts subject to forfeiture.  The Company has not accelerated vesting terms of its out-of-the-money stock options, or made any other significant changes, prior to adopting ASC 718, Share-Based Payments.

On April 23, 2007, the Company granted 130,500,000 stock options to two officers of the Company.  The options vest at twenty percent per year beginning April 23, 2007.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized compensation expense of $503,075 related to these options.  On May 1, 2008, 850,000 of the above stock options were canceled and on May 23, 2008, 74,666,667 of the above stock options were cancelled.  For year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $405,198 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $156,557 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized a compensation expense of $156,558 related to these options. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized compensation expense of $52,186 related to these options. No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On May 1, 2007, the Company granted 4,000,000 stock options to five employees of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized compensation expense of $29,214 related to these options.  During 2008 and 2009, 1,500,000 of the above options were cancelled prior to vesting.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $25,131 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $10,869 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2009 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On October 22, 2007, the Company granted 700,000 stock options to a business associate of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized compensation expense of $1,330 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $7,978 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $6,648 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2009 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On January 10, 2008, the Company granted 1,000,000 stock options to an advisor of the Company.  The options vest over one year.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $19,953 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2008 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On February 5, 2008, the Company granted 3,650,000 stock options to four directors and one employee of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $59,619 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $2,603 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2009 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  During 2010, 3,500,000 of the above options expired.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On May 1, 2008, the Company granted 850,000 stock options to an employee of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $5,242 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $7,862 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $2,620 related to these options. No further expense will be recognized for these options.

On June 8, 2009, the Company granted 4,500,000 stock options to four directors of the Company. The options vest in one year.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $42,663 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $33,837 related to these options. No further expense will be recognized for these options.  These options expired on June 8, 2011.

On April 23, 2010, the Company granted 4,800,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and the Company Secretary. The options vest in one year.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $27,000 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2011 the Company recognized compensation expense of $12,000.  No further expense will be recognized for these options.

On July 1, 2011, the Company granted 4,650,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and the Company Secretary. The options vest in one year. For the year ended December 31, 2011 the Company recognized compensation expense of $16,500.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized an expense of $16,500.  No further expense will be recognized for these options.

On August 6, 2012, the Company granted 4,650,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and the Company Secretary. The options vest in one year.  The Company Secretary left the Company and 150,000 stock options were cancelled. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense of $20,250.  For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized an expense of $20,250.  No further expense will be recognized for these options.

The Company recognizes compensation expense paid with common stock and other equity instruments issued for assets and services received based upon the fair value of the assets/services or the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily determined.

As of the date of this report the Company has not adopted a method to account for the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to ASC 718 and related interpretations.  However, whereas the Company has substantial net operating losses to offset future taxable income and its current deferred tax asset is completely reduced by the valuation allowance, no material tax effects are anticipated.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company valued stock options using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB 25.  Since the exercise price of stock options previously issued was greater than or equal to the market price on grant date, no compensation expense was recognized.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $20,250 and $16,500 respectively.

Recent Accounting Standards

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-04 “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820).” The amendments in ASU 2011-04 change the wording used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments include (1) those that clarify the Board's intent about the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and (2) those that change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. In addition, to improve consistency in application across jurisdictions some changes in wording are necessary to ensure that U.S. GAAP and IFRS fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are described in the same way (for example, using the word shall rather than should to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP). The amendments that clarify the Board's intent about the application of  existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements include (a) the application of the highest and best use and valuation premise concepts, (b) measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entity's shareholders' equity, and (c) disclosures about fair value measurements that clarify that a reporting entity should disclose quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in a fair value measurement that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The amendments in this Update that change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements include (a) measuring the fair value of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio, (b) application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement, and (c) additional disclosures about fair value measurements that expand the disclosures about fair value measurements. The amendments in ASU 2011-04 are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-05 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).”  Under the amendments in this Update, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. In a single continuous statement, the entity is required to present the components of net income and total net income, the components of other comprehensive income and a total for other comprehensive income, along with the total of comprehensive income in that statement. In the two-statement approach, an entity is required to present components of net income and total net income in the statement of net income. The statement of other comprehensive income should immediately follow the statement of net income and include the components of other comprehensive income and a total for other comprehensive income, along with a total for comprehensive income.  The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments do not require any transition disclosures.  The Company’s adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-12 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).”  In order to defer only those changes in Update 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments, the paragraphs in this Update supersede certain pending paragraphs in Update 2011-05. The amendments are being made to allow the Board time to re-deliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the Board is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before Update 2011-05.All other requirements in Update 2011-05 are not affected by this Update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.  The Company’s adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment" ("ASU 2012-02"), which permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit's indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than the asset's carrying value before applying the two-step goodwill impairment model that is currently in place. If it is determined through the qualitative assessment that the fair value of a reporting unit's indefinite-lived intangible asset is more likely than not greater than the asset's carrying value, the remaining impairment steps would be unnecessary. The qualitative assessment is optional, allowing companies to go directly to the quantitative assessment. ASU 2012-02 is effective for the Company for annual and interim indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed beginning October 1, 2012; however, early adoption is permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2012-02 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

The Company continually assesses any new accounting pronouncements to determine their applicability to the Company. Where it is determined that a new accounting pronouncement affects the Company’s financial reporting, the Company undertakes a study to determine the consequence of the change to its financial statements and assures that there are proper controls in place to ascertain that the Company’s financials properly reflect the change.

Pervasiveness of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and the differences could be material.

XML

NOTES PAYABLE

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

NOTES PAYABLE

NOTES PAYABLE

NOTE 3 – NOTES PAYABLE

Sterling National Bank

On September 8, 2010, in order to fund increasing Accounts Receivables and support working capital needs, Capstone secured a Financing Agreement from Sterling Capital Funding,(now called Sterling National Bank), located in New York, whereby Capstone receives funds for assigned retailer shipments. The assignments provide funding for an amount up to 85% of net invoices submitted.  There will be a base management fee equal to .45% of the gross invoice amount. The interest rate of the loan advance is ¼% above Sterling National Bank Base Rate which at time of closing was 5%.  The amounts borrowed under this agreement are secured by a right to set-off on or against any of the following (collectively as “Collateral”): all accounts including those at risk, all reserves, instruments, documents, notes, bills and chattel paper, letter of credit rights, commercial tort claims, proceeds of insurance, other forms of obligations owing to Sterling, bank and other deposit accounts whether or not reposed with affiliates, general intangibles (including without limitation all tax refunds, contract rights, trade names, trademarks, trade secrets, customer lists, software and all other licenses, rights, privileges and franchises), all balances, sums and other property at any time to our credit or in Sterling’s possession or in the possession of any Sterling Affiliates, together with all merchandise, the sale of which resulted in the creation of accounts receivable and in all such merchandise that may be returned by customers and all books and records relating to any of the foregoing, including the cash and non-cash proceeds of all of the foregoing.  Capstone Companies, Inc., formerly (CHDT Corp) and Howard Ullman, the previous Chairman of the Board of Directors of CHDT, had personally guaranteed Capstone Industries obligations under the Financial Agreement. As part of the agreement with Sterling National Bank, a subordination agreement was executed with Howard Ullman, a shareholder and director of the Company at that time.  These agreements subordinated the debt of $121,263 (plus future interest) and $81,000 (plus future interest) due to Howard Ullman (or his assigns), to the Sterling National Bank loan.  No payments will be made on the subordinated debt until the Sterling loan is paid in full.  As of December 31, 2012, the balance due to Sterling was $1,245,159.  As of June 30, 2013, the balance due to Sterling was $297,235.

On July 21, 2011 Stewart Wallach, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of Capstone Companies, Inc. formerly (CHDT) and JWTR Holdings, LLC   owned by a Director, Jeffrey Postal entered into a Securities and Notes Purchase Agreement with Howard Ullman, the previous Chairman of the Board of CHDT, whereby they would purchase equally all of Howard Ullmans notes including the notes subordinated to Sterling National Bank.

On July 15, 2011, Stewart Wallach individually and accepted by Sterling National Bank, agreed to replace Howard Ullman as the sole personal guarantor to Sterling National Bank for all of Capstone Industries, Inc. loans previously guaranteed by Howard Ullman.

Effective July 12, 2011, Capstone Industries, Inc., credit line with Sterling National Bank was increased from $2,000,000 up to $4,000,000 to provide additional funding for increased revenue growth.

Effective October 1st, 2011, Sterling Capital Funding will be conducting business as the Factoring and Trade Division of Sterling National Bank.  All obligations under our agreements have been assigned to Sterling National Bank.

XML

STOCK TRANSACTIONS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

STOCK TRANSACTIONS

STOCK TRANSACTIONS

NOTE 6 - STOCK TRANSACTIONS

Series “C” Preferred Stock

On July 9, 2009, the Company authorized and issued 1,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock in exchange for $700,000.  The 1,000 shares of Series C Stock are convertible into 67,979,725 common shares.  The par value of the Series C Preferred shares is $1.00.

Warrants

The Company has outstanding stock warrants that were issued in prior years to its officers and directors for a total of 5,975,000 shares of the Company's common stock. 1,975,000 of these warrants had an exercise price of $.05 and expired on November 11, 2011.  The remaining 4,000,000 warrants expire July 20, 2014. The warrants have an exercise price of $.03.

The Company issued a stock warrant to each of two former officers of the Company in December 2003 for a total of 35,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Each of the stock warrants expires on July 20, 2014, and entitles each former officer to purchase 10,000 and 25,000 shares, respectively, of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.05.

During September and October 2007, the Company issued 31,823,529 shares of common stock for cash at $.017 per share, or $541,000 total as part of a Private Placement under Rule 506 of Regulation D.  Along with the stock, each investor also received a warrant to purchase 30% of the shares purchased in the Private Placement.  A total of 9,548,819 warrants were issued.  The warrants are ten year warrants and have an exercise price of $.025 per share.

On July 11, 2008, the Company received a loan from a director of $250,000.  As part of this note payable, the Company also issued a warrant to the loan holder to purchase 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.025 per share.  At the date of issuance, the stock price was $.021 per share.  The Company accounted for the debt and warrants using APB 14, whereby the proceeds of $250,000 were allocated between the debt and warrants.  This resulted in the warrants being valued at $56,375 which was recorded as additional paid-in capital, and a discount on the note of $56,375 being recognized.  The discount was amortized over the term of the note (6 months) to interest expense.  At December 31, 2008, the discount had been fully amortized resulting in interest expense of $56,375 being recognized.  These warrants expire July 10, 2013.

Options

In 2005, the Company authorized the 2005 Equity Plan that made available 10,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance through awards of options, restricted stock, stock bonuses, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units.  On May 20, 2005 the Company granted non-qualified stock options under the company’s 2005 Equity Plan for a maximum of 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $0.02 per share. The options expire May 25, 2015 and may be exercised any time after May 25, 2005.

On May 1, 2007, the Company granted 4,000,000 stock options to five employees of the Company under the 2005 Plan.  The options vest over two years.  During 2008, 1,000,000 of these options were cancelled prior to vesting.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $10,869 and $25,131 related to these stock options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 4.64%

Expected term – 11 years

Expected volatility of stock – 131.13%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On April 23, 2007, the Company granted a ten-year non-qualified, non-statutory stock option for 102,400,000 “restricted” shares of the Company’s common stock to Stewart Wallach, the Company’s CEO, as incentive compensation.  The exercise price of the options is $.029 per share, which was the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant.  Twenty percent of the options vested on the date of issuance, and twenty percent per year will vest on the anniversary date through April 23, 2011.  On May 23, 2008, 74,666,667 of these options were cancelled.  Compensation expense was recognized through the date of the cancellation of the options. On July 31st, 2009, 5,000,000 of the fully vested options and fully expensed options were amended and transferred to G. McClinton.  Also on April 23, 2007, the Company granted a ten-year non-qualified, non-statutory stock option for 28,100,000 “restricted” shares of the Company’s common stock to Gerry McClinton, the Company’s COO and Secretary, as incentive compensation.  The exercise price of the options is $.029 per share, which was the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant.  Twenty percent of the options vested on the date of issuance, and twenty percent per year will vest on the anniversary date through April 23, 2011.  On May 1, 2008, 850,000 of these options were cancelled. On July 31st, 2009, 5,000,000 of S. Wallach fully vested and fully expensed options were amended and transferred to G. McClinton.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $156,558 and $156,557 related to these stock options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 4.66%

Expected term – 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 133.59%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

The Company has recognized compensation expense of $52,186 for the year ended December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2011 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options after 2011.

On October 22, 2007, the Company granted 700,000 stock options to a business associate of the Company.  The options vest over two years.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $6,648 and $7,978 related to these stock options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 4.42%

Expected term – 11 and 12 years

Expected volatility of stock – 134.33%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On January 10, 2008, the Company granted 1,000,000 stock options to an advisor of the Company.  The options vest over one year.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $19,953 related to these options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 3.91%

Expected term – 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 133.83%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On February 5, 2008, the Company granted 3,650,000 stock options to four directors and one employee of the Company.  The options vest over two years.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $2,603 and $59,619 related to these options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 1.93% to 3.61%

Expected term – 2 to 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 133.83%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On May 1, 2008, the Company granted 850,000 stock options to an employee of the Company.  The options vest over two years.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $2,620 and $7,862 related to these options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 3.78%

Expected term – 11 years

Expected volatility of stock – 133.59%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

The Company recognized compensation expense of $2,620 in 2010 related to these stock options. As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On June 8, 2009, the Company granted 4,500,000 stock options to four directors of the Company.  The options vest over one year.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted. For the years ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $33,837 related to these options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 1.42%

Expected term – 2 years

Expected volatility of stock – 500.5%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

As of December 31, 2010 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  As of June 8, 2011 these options had expired. No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On April 23rd, 2010, the Company granted 4,500,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and 300,000 stock options to the Company Secretary.  The options vest over one year.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted.  For the years ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $27,000 related to these options.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 2.61%

Expected term – 5 to 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 500.5%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 100

For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized compensation expense of $12,000 related to these stock options. As of December 31, 2011 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On July 1, 2011, the Company granted 4,500,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and 150,000 stock options to the Company Secretary.  The options vest over one year.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – 1.80 – 3.22%

Expected term – 5 to 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 500%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 150

For the six months ended December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense of $ 16,500 respectively, for a total compensation expense of $33,000 of compensation expense related to these stock options.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On August 6, 2012, the Company granted 4,500,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and 150,000 stock options to the Company Secretary.  The options vest over one year.  The Company Secretary has subsequently left the Company and the 150,000 granted options that have been cancelled.

The Binomial Lattice (Suboptimal) option pricing model was used to calculate the fair value of the options granted.  The following assumptions were used in the fair value calculations:

Risk free rate – .65 – 1.59%

Expected term – 5 to 10 years

Expected volatility of stock – 500%

Expected dividend yield – 0%

Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple – 2.0

Number of Steps – 150

For the period ended December31, 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense of $20,250 related to these stock options. For the 6 months ended June 30, 2013, $20,250 compensation expense was recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

The following table sets forth the Company’s stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and activity for the years then ended:

			Weighted
		Weighted	Average
		Average	Remaining	Aggregate
		Exercise	Contractual	Intrinsic
	Shares	Price	Term (Years)	Value
Outstanding, January 1, 2012	69,883,333	$    0.029	5.26	$          -
Granted	4,650,000	0.029	-	-
Exercised	-	-	-	-
Forfeited/expired	150,000	0.029	-	-
Outstanding, December31 , 2012	74,383,333	$    0.029	4.28	$           -
Granted	-	-	-	-
Exercised	-	-	-	-
Forfeited/expired		-	-	-
Outstanding, June 30, 2013	74,383,333	$    0.029	3.78	$           -
Vested/exercisable at December 31, 2012	69,883,333	$    0.029	4.26	$           -
Vested/exercisable at June 30, 2013	69,883,333	$    0.029	3.76	$           -

The following table summarizes the information with respect to options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan:

Exercise Price	Options Outstanding	Remaining Contractual Life in Years	Average Exercise Price	Number of Options Currently Exercisable
$.02	250,000	1.92	$.020	250,000
$.029	54,983,333	3.83	$.029	54,983,333
$.029	2,500,000	4.83	$.029	2,500,000
$.029	700,000	5.83	$.029	700,000
$.029	1,000,000	4.50	$.029	1,000,000
$.029	150,000	4.58	$.029	150,000
$.029	850,000	5.92	$.029	850,000
$.029	4,500,000	1.83	$.029	4,500,000
$.029	300,000	6.83	$.029	300,000
$.029	4,500,000	3.00	$.029	4,500,000
$.029	150,000	8.00	$.029	150,000
$.029	4,500,000	4.08	$.029	4,500,000

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES

NOTE 4 – NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES

Capstone Companies, Inc. - Notes Payable to Officers and Directors

On May 30, 2007, the Company executed a $575,000 promissory note payable to a director of the Company.  This note was amended on July 1, 2009 and again on January 2, 2010. As amended, the note carries an interest rate of 8% per annum.  All principal is payable in full, with accrued interest, on January 2, 2014.  On November 2, 2007, the Company issued 12,074 shares of its Series B Preferred stock valued at $28,975 as payment towards this loan.  The loan grants to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.

On July 12, 2011 Stewart Wallach, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of CHDT and JWTR Holdings, LLC owned by a Director, Jeffrey Postal entered into a Securities and Notes Purchase Agreement with Howard Ullman, the previous Chairman of the Board of CHDT, whereby they would purchase equally all of Howard Ullmans notes including the subordinated notes net of any offsets, monies due by Howard Ullman to the Company. The original terms of all notes would remain the same. On July 12, 2011 this note payable was reassigned by Howard Ullman, equally split between Stewart Wallach Director and JWTR Holdings LLC.   The note balance of $466,886 was reduced by $47,940 for offsets due by Howard Ullman. The revised loan balance of $418,946 was reassigned equally $209,473 to Stewart Wallach and $209,473 to JWTR Holdings LLC. As amended the note is due on or before January 2, 2014.  At December 31, 2011, the total amount payable on the reassigned notes to Stewart Wallach was $216,498 which includes accrued interest of $7025 and JWTR Holdings, LLC was $216,498 which includes accrued interest of $7,025.  At December 31, 2012, the total amount payable on the reassigned notes to Stewart Wallach was $233,256 which includes accrued interest of $23,783 and JWTR Holdings; LLC was $233,256 which includes accrued interest of $23,783.  For the revised notes the interest payments are being accrued monthly to the note holders.  As of June 30, 2013 the total combined balance due on these two notes was $483,132 which includes interest of $64,186.

On July 11, 2008, the Company received a loan from a director of $250,000.  As amended, the note is due on or before January 2, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum.  At December 31, 2012, the total amount payable on this note was $310,000 including interest of $60,000.  At June 30, 2013, the total amount payable on this note was $319,918 including interest of $69,918.

As part of this note payable, the Company also issued a warrant to the loan holder to purchase 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.025 per share.  At the date of issuance, the stock price was $.021 per share.  The Company accounted for the debt and warrants using APB 14, whereby the proceeds of $250,000 were allocated between the debt and warrants.  This resulted in the warrants being valued at $56,375, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital, and a discount on the note of $56,375 being recognized.  The discount was amortized over the term of the note (6 months) to interest expense.  At December 31, 2008, the discount had been fully amortized resulting in interest expense of $56,375 being recognized.

On March 11, 2010, the Company received a loan from a director of $100,000. As amended, the note is due on or before January 2, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum.  At December 31, 2012 the total amount payable on this note was $122,466 including interest of $22,466.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $126,433 including interest of $26,433.

On May 11, 2010, the Company received a loan from a director of $75,000. As amended, the note is due on or before January 2, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum.  The loan grants to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.  At December 31, 2012 the total amount payable on this note was $90,847 including interest of $15,847.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $93,822, including interest of $18,822.

On June 11, 2010, the Company received a loan from a director of $150,000. As amended, the note is due on or before January 2, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum.  The loan grants to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.  At December 31, 2012 the total amount payable on this note was $180,674 including interest of $30,674.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $186,625 including interest of $36,625.

On April 8, 2013, the Company received a loan from a director of $150,000. The note is due on or before October 8, 2013 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum. At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $152,729 including interest of $2,729.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company executed three notes payable for a combined total of $200,000 to an officer of the Company.  As amended, the notes are due on or before January 2, 2014 and carry an interest rate of 8% per annum.  These loans grant to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.  At December 31, 2012 the total amount due on these notes was $248,000, including interest of $48,000.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount due on these notes was $255,935 including interest of $55,935.

On January 15, 2013, the company received a new loan of $250,000 from Stewart Wallach, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of Capstone Companies, Inc. formerly (CHDT) with due date on or before January 15, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum. This loan grants to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $259,096 including interest of $9,096

On January 15, 2013, the company received a new loan of $250,000 from a director of Capstone Companies, Inc. formerly (CHDT) with due date on or before January 15, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 8% per annum. This loan grants to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount payable on this note was $259,906 including interest of $9,096.

Capstone Industries – Notes Payable to Officers and Directors

On July 16, 2007, Capstone Industries executed a $103,000 promissory note payable to a director of the Company.  As amended, the note carries an interest rate of 8% per annum and is due on or before January 2, 2013.  In December 2008, the Company borrowed an additional $75,000 from this director.  As amended, this note was due on or before January 2, 2013, but it has been extended and is due on or before January 2, 2014. These loans grant to the holder a security interest in the accounts receivable of the Company up to the amount of the unpaid Principal.

On July 12, 2011 Stewart Wallach, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of CHDT and JWTR Holdings, LLC owned by a Director, Jeffrey Postal entered into a Securities and Notes Purchase Agreement  with Howard Ullman, the previous Chairman of the Board of CHDT, whereby they would purchase all of Howard Ullman’s notes including the subordinated notes. The original terms of all notes would remain the same.  On July 12, 2011 the subordinated note payable was reassigned by Howard Ullman, to Stewart Wallach director and JWTR Holding LLC.  The original note balance of $178,000 was reassigned to Stewart Wallach and to JWTR Holdings LLC. For the year 2011 the interest payments were paid monthly to the note holder as of July 31, 2011. As amended, this note was due on or before January 2, 2013 but it has been extended and is due on or before January 2, 2014.

At December 31, 2012 the total amount due on these two notes was $222,472, including interest of $44,472.  At June 30, 2013 the total amount due on these two notes was $229,533, including interest of $51,533.

Purchase Order Assignment- Funding Agreements

During the Second Quarter 2012, Capstone Industries, Inc. received a $432,000 loan from George Wolf who is a business partner of the CEO. The loan is due on or before August 31, 2012 and carries an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual).  As of December 31, 2012 the note balance was paid in full.

During the Second Quarter 2012, Capstone Industries, Inc. received a $746,000 loan from Jeffrey Postal a director of the Company. The loan is due on or before January 2, 2013 and carries an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual).  As of December 31, 2012 the total amount due on these notes was $602,148 including interest of $27,148. During the first Quarter 2013, the loan balance was paid in full and the total amount due on these notes is $0.00.

During the Second Quarter 2013, Capstone Industries, Inc. received total $1,150,000 under three notes from Jeffrey Postal a director of the Company.  These notes are due on or before January 2, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual).  As of June 30, 2014 the total amount due under these notes was $1,168,099 including interest of $18,099.

During the Second Quarter 2012, Capstone Industries, Inc. received a $375,000 loan from Phyllis Postal. Mrs. Postal is a mother of a director of the Company. The loan was due on or before September 30, 2012 and carried an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual).  During the Third Quarter 2012, an additional $150,000 loan was received and then the entire balance was paid in full in September 2012. As of December 31, 2012 the total amount due on these notes is $0.00.

During the First Quarter 2013, Capstone Industries, Inc. received two notes from George Wolf who is business partner of the CEO Stewart Wallach, with payment due date of on or before January 02, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual).  Note # 021313 dated February 13, 2013, total amount due at June 30, 2013 was $233,400, including interest of $8,400.  Note # 032013 dated March 20, 2013, total note amount due at June 30, 2013 was $41,341 including accrued interest of $1,341.  On April 15th, the company received a new note advance of $40,000 with payment due date of on or before January 02, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 1% simple per month (12% annual), the total amount due at June 30, 2013 was $40,999 including interest of $999.

During the Third Quarter 2012, Capstone Industries, Inc. received a $220,000 loan from Everett Fleisig who is the father in law of an officer of the company. The loan is due on or before January 2, 2013 and carries an interest rate of 1.0% simple interest per month (12% annual). As of December 31, 2012 the total amount due on this note was $0.00.

On October 10, 2012, the Company entered into agreement with Phyllis Postal, which carried a simple interest rate of 1% per month (12% annual), the Company received $200,000 under this agreement which was paid in full with accrued interest as of December 31, 2012. On May 21, 2013, the Company entered into agreement with Phyllis Postal, which carries a simple interest rate of 1% per month (12% annual) with payment due date on or before January 2, 2014. The total amount due on this note at June 30, 2013 was $303,058 including interest of $3,058.

Working Capital Loan Agreements

On April 1st 2012, the Company signed a working capital loan agreement with Postal Capital Funding, LLC, (“PCF”) a private capital funding company owned by Jeffrey Postal and James McClinton who is a director and director and senior officer of the Company.  Pursuant to the agreement, the company may borrow up to a maximum of $1,000,000 of revolving credit from PCF.  Amounts borrowed were to be repaid by April 1, 2013 at an interest rate of 8%.  As amended, this note is due on or before January 2, 2014.  As of December 31, 2012, the loan balance under this agreement was $382,310 including interest of $7,310. During the first two quarters 2013, additional $123,000 loan was received by the company. As of June 30, 2013, the loan balance under this agreement was $521,548 including interest of $23,548

Notes and Loans Payable to Related Parties – Maturities

The total amount payable to officers, directors and related parties as of June 30, 2013 was 4,674,764 including accrued interest of $276,335.  The maturities under the notes and loan payable to related parties for the next five years are:

Year Ended December, 31,
2013	$	152,729
2014		4,522,035
2015		-
2016		-
2017		-
Total future maturities		4,674,764

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Maturities (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Maturities
Total amount payable to officers, directors	$ 4,674,764
Accrued interest on amount payable to officers, directors	$ 276,335

XML

Organization And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Recognized Compensation Expense (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009	Dec. 31, 2008
Organization And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Compensation Expense Recognized
Compensation Expense Recognized on stock options granted to four directors and one employee					$ 2,603	$ 59,619
Options expired, granted to four directors and one employee				3,500,000
Compensation Expense Recognized on stock options granted to an employee				2,620	7,862	5,242
Compensation Expense Recognized on stock options granted to four directors		16,500	12,000	33,837	42,663
Compensation Expense Recognized on stock options granted to four directors and company secretary		20,250	16,500	27,000
Additional compensation expense to be recognized over the vesting period estimated	20,250
Additional total compensation expense to be recognized over the vesting period estimated	$ 40,500

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Loan From A Director (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Jul. 11, 2008
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Loan From A Director
8 % Loan from a director	$ 250,000	$ 250,000
Interest amount on loan from a director	69,918	0
Total Amount Payable including interest	$ 319,918	$ 250,000

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Promissory Notes (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Jul. 12, 2011	Jul. 16, 2007
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Promissory Notes
Promissory notes payable			$ 178,000	$ 103,000
Interest rate on Promissory notes payable.			8.00%	8.00%
Additional loan from director				75,000
Total amount due on these two notes	229,533	222,472
Interest amount on these two notes	$ 51,533	$ 44,472

XML

Stock Transactions Stock Options granted (Details)	Jun. 08, 2009	May 01, 2008	Feb. 05, 2008	Jan. 10, 2008	Oct. 22, 2007
Stock Transactions Stock Options granted
Granted Stock options to a business associate.					700,000
Options vest period.	1	2	2	1	2
Granted Stock options to an advisor.				1,000,000
Granted Stock options to four Directors and one Employee.			3,650,000
Granted Stock options to an employee.		850,000
Granted Stock options to four Directors.	4,500,000

XML

Stock Transactions options granted (Details) (USD $)	May 01, 2007	May 20, 2005
Stock Transactions options granted
Stock options granted non-qualified under 2005 Equity plan		250,000
Stock options granted to five employees	4,000,000
Options vesting period (in years)	2
Option price per share		$ 0.02

XML

COMMITMENTS Employment Agreement (Details) (USD $)	Feb. 05, 2008
COMMITMENTS Employment Agreement
Amount paid to executive officer Wallach	$ 225,000
Percentage of increase per year of executive officer compensation Wallach	0.05%
Amount paid to executive officer for 2009 Wallach	236,250
Amount paid to executive officer for 2010 Wallach	175,412
Amount paid to executive officer for 2011 Wallach	180,000
Amount paid to executive officer for 2012 Wallach	260,033
Accrued amount for deferred wages in 2012 Wallach	40,233
Amount paid to chief operating officer McClinton	150,000
Amount paid to chief operating officer for 2009 McClinton	157,500
Amount paid to chief operating officer for 2010 McClinton	113,546
Amount paid to chief operating officer for 2011 McClinton	146,250
Amount paid to chief operating officer for 2012 McClinton	187,000
Accrued amount for deferred wages in 2012 McClinton	572
Amount paid to Chairman of Board of Directors Mr. Ullman	100,000
Amount paid to Chairman of Board of Directors for 2010 Mr. Ullman	$ 73,444

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS PARENTHETICALS (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Stockholder equity par value
Preferred Stock, Series A, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred Stock, Series A, shares authorized	100,000,000	100,000,000
Preferred Stock, Series A, shares issued	0	0
Preferred Stock, Series B-1, shares par value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred Stock, Series B-1, shares authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Preferred Stock, Series B-1, shares issued	0	0
Preferred Stock, Series C, par value	$ 1.00	$ 1.00
Preferred Stock, Series C, shares authorized	1,000	1,000
Preferred Stock, Series C, shares issued	1,000	1,000
Common Stock, par value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Common Stock, shares authorized	850,000,000	850,000,000
Common Stock, shares issued	657,760,532	655,885,532

XML

COST METHOD INVESTMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

COST METHOD INVESTMENTS

COST METHOD INVESTMENTS

NOTE 9 – COST METHOD INVESTMENTS

On January 15, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with AC Kinetics, Inc. to purchase 100 shares of AC Kinetics Series A Preferred Stock for $500,000. These shares carry a liquidation preference in the amount of $500,000, are convertible at the companies demand into 3% of the outstanding shares of AC Kinetics common stock and have anti-dilution protection.

In addition, the Company and AC Kinetics have agreed to cooperate in the development and commercialization of consumer and industrial products to be solely owned by the Company.  AC Kinetics will be the Company’s advanced product developer. AC Kinetics will notify the appropriate technology departments at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) of the Company’s ability and desire to commercialize consumer and industrial products developed in the MIT incubator departments.

The Company and AC Kinetics also entered into a royalty agreement whereby, the Company will receive a 7% Royalty on any licensing revenues received by AC Kinetics for products sold by them.  This royalty agreement will terminate upon receipt by the Company of royalties of $500,000.

The aggregate carrying amount of cost method investments at June 30, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following:

	2013	2012
AC Kinetics Series A Convertible Preferred Stock	$500,000	$0

It was not practicable to estimate fair value of AC Kinetics Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and such an estimate was not made because, during the six months ended June 30, 2013, there were no events or changes in circumstances that could have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of such investments.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Continuing operations:
Net Income (Loss)	$ (884,731)	$ (708,754)
Adjustments necessary to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Stock issued for expenses	14,064	0
Depreciation and amortization	45,407	25,810
Compensation expense from stock options	20,250	16,500
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable	1,626,275	706,451
(Increase) decrease in inventory	37,665	(517,656)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses	(614,655)	(757,764)
(Increase) decrease in other assets	(23,372)	(4,346)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses	(598,114)	(70,516)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest on notes payable	96,333	82,430
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(280,878)	(1,227,845)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment.	(500,000)	0
Purchase of property and equipment	(7,195)	(2,401)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(507,195)	(2,401)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes payable	2,203,298	1,540,000
Repayments of notes payable	(3,151,222)	(1,801,281)
Proceeds from notes and loans payable to related parties	2,528,000	1,553,000
Repayments of notes and loans payable to related parties	(575,000)	0
Net cash provided by financing activities	1,005,076	1,291,719
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents	217,003	61,473
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period	411,259	164,610
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	628,262	226,083
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest.	31,602	6,560
Franchise and income taxes	0	0
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

XML

STOCK TRANSACTIONS Options (Details)	Shares.	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at Dec. 31, 2011	69,883,333	0.029	5.26	0
Granted	4,650,000	0.029		0
Exercised				0
Forfeited/expired	150,000	0.029		0
VestedExercisable at Dec. 31, 2012	69,883,333	0.029	4.26	0
Outstanding2 at Dec. 31, 2012	74,383,333	0.029	4.28	0
Outstanding at Dec. 31, 2012
Granted.	0			0
Exercised.				0
Forfeited/expired.				0
VestedExercisable1 at Jun. 30, 2013	69,883,333	0.029	3.76	0
Outstanding3 at Jun. 30, 2013	74,383,333	0.029	3.78	0

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Current Assets:
Cash	$ 628,262	$ 411,259
Accounts receivable - net	1,047,280	2,673,555
Inventory,	546,705	584,370
Prepaid expense	965,659	351,003
Total Current Assets	3,187,906	4,020,187
Fixed Assets:
Computer equipment & software	66,448	66,448
Machinery and equipment	661,596	654,401
Furniture and fixtures	5,665	5,665
Less: Accumulated depreciation	(627,912)	(597,042)
Total Fixed Assets	105,797	129,472
Other Non-current Assets:
Product development costs - net	36,114	27,280
Investment (AC Kinetics)	500,000	0
Goodwill	1,936,020	1,936,020
Total Other Non-current Assets	2,472,134	1,963,300
Total Assets	5,765,837	6,112,959
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	516,051	1,114,166
Note payable - Sterling Factors	297,235	1,245,159
Notes and loans payable to related parties - current maturities	4,674,764	602,148
Total Current Liabilities	5,488,050	2,961,473
Long Term Liabilities
Notes and loans payable to related parties - Long Term	0	2,023,283
Total Liabilities	5,488,050	4,984,756
Commitments and Contingent Liablities (Note 5)
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $.001 per share, authorized 100,000,000 shares, issued -0- shares	0	0
Preferred Stock, Series B-1, par value $.0001 per share, authorized 50,000,000 shares, issued -0- shares	0	0
Preferred Stock, Series C, par value $1.00 per share, authorized 1,000 shares, issued 1,000 shares	1,000	1,000
Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share, authorized 850,000,000 shares,657,760,532 and 655,885,532 shares issued at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	65,778	65,589
Additional paid-in capital	7,172,059	7,137,933
Accumulated deficit	(6,961,050)	(6,076,319)
Total Stockholders' Equity	277,787	1,128,203
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$ 5,765,837	$ 6,112,959

XML

Stock Transactions Assumptions were used in the fair value calculations (Details) (USD $)	Feb. 05, 2008	Jan. 10, 2008	Oct. 22, 2007	May 01, 2007	Apr. 23, 2007
Assumptions were used in the fair value calculations
Risk free rate		3.91%	4.42%	4.64%	4.66%
Risk free minimum rate	1.93%
Risk free maximum rate	3.61%
Expected term (in years)		10		11	10
Expected term (in years) minimum	2		11
Expected term (in years) maximum	10		12
Expected volatility of stock	133.83%	133.83%	134.33%	131.13%	133.59%
Expected dividend yield	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple	$ 2.0	$ 2.0	$ 2.0	$ 2.0	$ 2.0
Number of Steps	100	100	100	100	100

XML

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE Customers And Vendors (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE Customers And Vendors
Percentage of Gross Revenue Customer A	60.00%	55.00%
Percentage of Gross Revenue Customer B	10.00%	19.00%
Percentage of Gross Revenue Customer C	12.00%	13.00%
Percentage of total Gross Revenue	82.00%	87.00%
Account Receivable Customer A	$ 2,208,495	$ 1,014,690
Account Receivable Customer B	464,601	488,468
Account Receivable Customer C	35,435	0
Total account receivable customers	2,708,531	1,503,158
Percentage of purchases vendor A	81.00%	62.00%
Percentage of purchases vendor B	13.00%	35.00%
Total percentage of purchases vendors	94.00%	97.00%
Accounts Payable vendor A	818,883	291,350
Accounts Payable vendor B	28,834	350
Total accounts payable vendors	$ 847,717	$ 291,700

XML

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Fixed Assets (Details)	Jun. 30, 2013
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Inventory Property and Equipment
Computer equipment estimated useful life minimum (in years)	3
Computer equipment estimated useful life maximum (in years)	7
Computer software estimated useful life minimum (in years)	3
Computer software estimated useful life maximum (in years)	7
Machinery and equipment estimated useful life minimum (in years)	3
Machinery and equipment estimated useful life maximum (in years)	7
Furniture and fixture estimated useful life minimum (in years)	3
Furniture and fixture estimated useful life maximum (in years)	7

XML

LEASES Principal Executive Office Rental (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
LEASES Principal Executive Office Rentals
Rental expenses	$ 27,935	$ 28,222

XML

Stock Transactions Compensation Expense (Details) (USD $)	6 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009	Dec. 31, 2008	Dec. 31, 2007
Stock Transactions Compensation Expense
Recognized compensation expense.				$ 52,186		$ 156,558	$ 156,557	$ 405,198	$ 503,075
Compensation expense recognized on stock options granted to business associate							6,648	7,978
Compensation expense recognized on stock options granted to advisor								19,953
Recognized compensation expense on stock options granted to four directors and one employee.							2,603	59,619
Recognized Compensation expense on stock options granted to an employee.						2,620	7,862	5,242
Recognized Compensation expense on stock options granted to four Directors.			16,500		12,000	33,837	42,663
Compensation expense recognized on stock options granted to four directors and company secretary,,			20,250	12,000	16,500	27,000
Compensation expense recognized on stock options granted to four directors and company secretary.		16,500		16,500
Compensation expense recognized in the period.	20,250
Compensation expense recognized through June 30, 2013	$ 20,250

XML

COST METHOD INVESTMENTS AC KINETICS, INC.(DETAILS) (USD $)	Jan. 15, 2013
COST METHOD INVESTMENTS AC KINETICS, INC.
Agreement to purchase shares of AC Kinetics Series A preferred stock for an amount of	$ 500,000
Number of preferred stock shares series A	100
Covertible on demand into fixed percentage of outstanding Shares of AC Kinetics Common stock with anti-dilution protection	3.00%
Royalty percentage on licensing revenues received by AC kinetics for products sold by them	7.00%

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Purchases Order Assignment- Funding Agreement (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Purchases Order Assignment- Funding Agreement
Total amount due on note1 George Wolf	$ 41,341
Accrued interest George wolf note1	1,341
Total amount due on note2 George Wolf	40,999
Accrued interest George wolf note2	$ 999

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Loan Director (Details) (USD $)	Apr. 08, 2013	Jan. 15, 2013	Jun. 11, 2010	May 11, 2010	Mar. 11, 2010	Jun. 30, 2008
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Loan Director
Loan received from director	$ 150,000	$ 250,000	$ 150,000	$ 75,000	$ 100,000	$ 200,000
Interest rate on Loan received from director,	8.00%	8.00%	8.00%	8.00%	8.00%	8.00%
Interest amount on notes of director at the end of the year			30,674	15,847	22,466	48,000
Total Amount due on notes at the end of the year			180,674	90,847	122,466	248,000
Interest amount accrued at the end of the quarter	2,729	9,096	36,625	18,822	26,433	55,935
Total Amount due on notes at the end of the quarter	$ 152,729	$ 259,906	$ 186,625	$ 93,822	$ 126,433	$ 255,935

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Amount Payables (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Amount Payables
Warrants to loan holder to purchase	4,000,000
Common stock price per share	$ 0.025
Common stock price per share at the date of issuance	$ 0.021
Debt and warrants	$ 250,000
Warrants valued	56,375
Discount on warrants	56,375
Interest expenses	$ 56,375

XML

OTHER ASSETS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

OTHER ASSETS

OTHER ASSETS

NOTE 8 – OTHER ASSETS

Other Assets at June 30, 2013 and 2012 consists of the following:

	2013			2012			Life in Years
Packaging Artwork and Design	$	298,804			255,817			2
Less:  Accumulated Amortization		(262,690	)		(236,204	)
	$	36,114			19,613

Amortization expense for the year ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $14,538 and $8,356

XML

OTHER ASSETS (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
OTHER ASSETS {2}
Packaging Artwork and Design	$ 298,804	$ 255,817
Less: Accumulated Amortization	(262,690)	(236,204)
Net amount of Other assets	$ 36,114	$ 19,613

XML

NOTES PAYABLE Financing Agreement (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Jul. 12, 2011	Sep. 08, 2010
NOTES PAYABLE Financing Agreement
Percentage of net invoices to be submitted				85.00%
Percentage of gross invoices				45.00%
Interest rate of loan advance on Sterling National Bank Base Rate				0.25%
Closing rate of Sterling National Bank Base Rate				5.00%
Subordinated debt due to Howard Ullman				$ 121,263
Subordinated debt due to Sterling National Bank				81,000
Balance of notes payable due to Sterling	297,235	1,245,159
Credit line with Sterling National Bank Opening			2,000,000
Credit line with Sterling National Bank Increased			$ 4,000,000

XML

Notes and Loans Payable to Related Parties Maturities For The Next Five Years (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013
Notes and Loans Payable to Related Parties Maturities For The Next Five Years
Future Maturities Year Ended December 31, 2013	$ 152,729
Future Maturities Year Ended December 31, 2014	4,522,035
Future Maturities Year Ended December 31, 2015	0
Future Maturities Year Ended December 31, 2016	0
Future Maturities Year Ended December 31, 2017	0
Total future maturities	$ 4,674,764

XML

ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Tables)

Property and Equipment

Fixed assets are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated economic useful lives of the related assets as follows:

Computer equipment	3 - 7 years
Computer software	3 - 7 years
Machinery and equipment	3 - 7 years
Furniture and fixtures	3 - 7 years

XML

INCOME TAXES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

INCOME TAXES

INCOME TAXES

NOTE 7 - INCOME TAXES

As of December 31, 2012, the Company had a net operating loss carry forward for income tax reporting purposes of approximately $4,600,000 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2031. Current tax laws limit the amount of loss available to be offset against future taxable income when a substantial change in ownership occurs. Therefore, the amount available to offset future taxable income may be limited.  No tax benefit has been reported in the financial statements, because the Company believes there is a 50% or greater chance the carry forwards will expire unused. Accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the loss carryforwards are offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

	2012			2011
Net Operating (Profit) Losses	$	1,564,000		$	1,326,000
Valuation Allowance		(1,564,000	)		(1,326,000	)
	$	-		$	-

The provision for income taxes differ from the amount computed using the federal US statutory income tax rate as follows:

	2012			2011
Provision (Benefit) at US Statutory Rate	$	(206,000	)	$	196,000
State Income Tax		-			(32,000	)
Depreciation and Amortization		(68,000	)		(60,000	)
Accrued Officer Compensation		-			14,000
Non-Deductible Stock Based Compensation		12,000			27,000
Other Differences		24,000			25,000
Increase (Decrease) in Valuation Allowance		238,000			(170,000	)
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)	$	-		$	-

The Company evaluates its valuation allowance requirements based on projected future operations.  When circumstances change and cause a change in management’s judgment about the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the impact of the change on the valuation is reflected in current income.

The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service and the Florida Department of Revenue for the years ending December 31, 2009 through 2012.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income taxes in income tax expense. The Company had incurred no penalties and interest for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

XML

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE

CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE

NOTE 2 - CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK AND ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable.

The Company has no significant off-balance-sheet concentrations of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, options contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company at times has cash and cash equivalents with its financial institution in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance limits.  The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions which minimize these risks.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $226,810  funds in excess of FDIC limits.

Accounts Receivable

The Company grants credit to its customers, substantially all of whom are retail establishments located throughout the United States.  The Company typically does not require collateral from customers.  Credit risk is limited due to the financial strength of the customers comprising the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across different geographical regions.  The Company monitors exposure of credit losses and maintains allowances for anticipated losses considered necessary under the circumstances.

Major Customers

The Company had three customers who comprised at least ten percent (10%) of gross revenue during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.  The loss of these customers would adversely impact the business of the Company.  The percentage of gross revenue and the accounts receivable from each of these customers is as follows:

	Gross Revenue %			Accounts Receivable
	2012	2011		2012		2011
Customer A	60%	55%	$	2,208,495	$	1,014,690
Customer B	10%	19%		464,601		488,468
Customer C	12%	13%		35,435		0
	82%	87%	$	2,708,531	$	1,503,158

Major Vendors

The Company had two vendors from which it purchased at least ten percent (10%) of merchandise during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The loss of these suppliers would adversely impact the business of the Company.  The percentage of purchases, and the related accounts payable from each of these vendors is as follows:

	Purchases %			Accounts Payable
	2012	2011		2012		2011
Vendor A	81%	62%	$	818,883	$	291,350
Vendor B	13%	35%		28,834		350
	94%	97%	$	847,717	$	291,700

XML

Stock Transactions assumptions in the fair value calcuations (Details) (USD $)	Aug. 06, 2012	Jul. 02, 2011	Apr. 23, 2010	Jun. 08, 2009	May 01, 2008
Stock Transactions assumptions in the fair value calcuations
Risk free rate.			2.61%	1.42%	3.78%
Risk free minimum rate.	65.00%	180.00%
Risk free maximum rate.	1.59%	322.00%
Expected term (in years).				200.00%	1100.00%
Expected term (in years) minimum.	5	5	5
Expected term (in years) maximum.	10	10	10
Expected volatility of stock.	500.00%	500.00%	500.50%	500.50%	133.59%
Expected dividend yield.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Suboptimal Exercise Behavior Multiple.	$ 2.0	$ 2.0	$ 2.0	$ 2.0	$ 2.0
Number of Steps.	150	150	100	100	100

XML

Stock Transactions Warrant (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2008	Jul. 11, 2008
Stock Transactions Warrant
Outstanding stock warrants issued in prior years	5,975,000
1975000 warrants had an exercise price	$ 0.05
Number of Warrants expired on November 11, 2011	1,975,000
Number of Warrants expired on July 20, 2014	4,000,000
4000000 warrants had an exercise price	$ 0.03
Loan from director			$ 250,000
Issuance of shares as part of notes payable			4,000,000
Per Share value of shares issued as part of notes payable			$ 0.021
Proceeds value allocated between the debt and warrants			250,000
Additional paid in capital warrants issued			56,375
Discount on the note fully amortized resulting in interest expense		$ 56,375

XML

NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Chief Executive Officer (Details) (USD $)	Jul. 12, 2011
NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES Chief Executive Officer
Notes payables balance	$ 466,886
Reduction in notes payables	47,940
Revised balance	418,946
Reassigned loan Stewart Wallach	209,473
Reassigned loan JWTR Holdings LLC	209,473
Total amount payable Stewart Wallach	216,498
Accrued interest Stewart Wallach	7,025
Total amount payable JWTR Holdings LLC	216,498
Accrued interest JWTR Holdings LLC	$ 7,025

XML

STOCK TRANSACTIONS Options Granted, Outstanding And Exercisable Under 2005 Plan (Details)	Exercise Price	Options Outstanding	Remaining Contractual Life in Years	Average Exercise Price	Number of Options Currently Exercisable
Balance of options granted at Mar. 31, 2013	0
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan	0.02	250,000	1.92	0.020	250,000
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan.	0.029	54,983,333	3.83	0.029	54,983,333
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan,	0.029	2,500,000	4.83	0.029	2,500,000
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan,,	0.029	700,000	5.83	0.029	700,000
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan..	0.029	1,000,000	4.50	0.029	1,000,000
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan;	0.029	150,000	4.58	0.029	150,000
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan:	0.029	850,000	5.92	0.029	850,000
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan'	0.029	4,500,000	1.83	0.029	4,500,000
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan',	0.029	300,000	6.83	0.029	300,000
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan;,	0.029	4,500,000	3.00	0.029	4,500,000
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan:,	0.029	150,000	8.00	0.029	150,000
Options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan.,	0.029	4,500,000	4.08	0.029	4,500,000
BalanceOfOptionsGranted1 at Jun. 30, 2013	0

XML

STOCK TRANSACTIONS (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

STOCK TRANSACTIONS (Tables)

Stock options outstanding

The following table sets forth the Company’s stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and activity for the years then ended:

			Weighted
		Weighted	Average
		Average	Remaining	Aggregate
		Exercise	Contractual	Intrinsic
	Shares	Price	Term (Years)	Value
Outstanding, January 1, 2012	69,883,333	$    0.029	5.26	$          -
Granted	4,650,000	0.029	-	-
Exercised	-	-	-	-
Forfeited/expired	150,000	0.029	-	-
Outstanding, December31 , 2012	74,383,333	$    0.029	4.28	$           -
Granted	-	-	-	-
Exercised	-	-	-	-
Forfeited/expired		-	-	-
Outstanding, June 30, 2013	74,383,333	$    0.029	3.78	$           -
Vested/exercisable at December 31, 2012	69,883,333	$    0.029	4.26	$           -
Vested/exercisable at June 30, 2013	69,883,333	$    0.029	3.76	$           -

Summarizes the information with respect to options granted, outstanding and exercisable

The following table summarizes the information with respect to options granted, outstanding and exercisable under the 2005 plan:

Exercise Price	Options Outstanding	Remaining Contractual Life in Years	Average Exercise Price	Number of Options Currently Exercisable
$.02	250,000	1.92	$.020	250,000
$.029	54,983,333	3.83	$.029	54,983,333
$.029	2,500,000	4.83	$.029	2,500,000
$.029	700,000	5.83	$.029	700,000
$.029	1,000,000	4.50	$.029	1,000,000
$.029	150,000	4.58	$.029	150,000
$.029	850,000	5.92	$.029	850,000
$.029	4,500,000	1.83	$.029	4,500,000
$.029	300,000	6.83	$.029	300,000
$.029	4,500,000	3.00	$.029	4,500,000
$.029	150,000	8.00	$.029	150,000
$.029	4,500,000	4.08	$.029	4,500,000

XML

ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

Interim Financial Statements

Interim Financial Statements

The unaudited financial statements as of June 30, 2013 and for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state the financial position and results of operations for the three months.  Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results which can be expected for full years.

Organization and Basis of Presentation

Organization and Basis of Presentation

CAPC was initially incorporated September 18, 1986 under the laws of the State of Delaware under the name "Yorkshire Leveraged Group, Incorporated", and then changed its domicile to Colorado in 1989 by merging into a Colorado corporation, named "Freedom Funding, Inc." Freedom Funding, Inc. then changed its name to "CBQ, Inc." by amendment of its Articles of Incorporation on November 25, 1998. In May 2004, the Company changed its name from “CBQ, Inc.” to “China Direct Trading Corporation” as part of a reincorporation from the State of Colorado to the State of Florida.  On May 7, 2007, the Company amended its charter to change its name from “China Direct Trading Corporation” to “CHDT Corporation.”  This name change was effective as of July 16, 2007 for purposes of the change of its name on the OTC Bulletin Board.   With the name change, the trading symbol was changed to “CHDO.” On June 6, 2012, the Company amended its charter to change its name from “CHDT Corporation” to “CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC.”  This name change was effective as of July 6, 2012 for purposes of the change of its name on the OTC Bulletin Board.   With the name change, the trading symbol was changed to “CAPC.”

In February 2004, the Company established a new subsidiary, initially named “China Pathfinder Fund, L.L.C.”, a Florida limited liability company. During 2005, the name was changed to “Overseas Building Supply, LLC” (“OBS”) to reflect its shift in business lines from business development consulting services in China for North American companies to trading Chinese-made building supplies in South Florida.  This business line was ended in fiscal year 2007 and OBS name was changed to “Black Box Innovations, L.L.C.” (“BBI”) on March 20, 2008. On January 31, 2012 “BBI” name was changed to “Capstone Lighting Technologies, L.L.C” (“CLT”).

On January 27, 2006, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Complete Power Solutions ("CPS") to acquire 51% of the member interests of CPS. CPS was organized by William Dato on September 20, 2004, as a Florida limited Liability Company to distribute power generators in Florida and adjacent states.  The Company subsequently sold its 51% membership interest in CPS, pursuant to a Purchase and Settlement Agreement dated and effective as of December 31, 2006.

On September 13, 2006 the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Capstone Industries, Inc., a Florida corporation (Capstone).  Capstone was incorporated in Florida on May 15, 1996 and is engaged primarily in the business of wholesaling low technology consumer products to distributors and retailers in the United States.  Under the Stock Purchase Agreement the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Capstone Common Stock, and recorded goodwill of $1,936,020.

On April 13, 2012 , the Company established a wholly owned subsidiary in Hong Kong, named “ Capstone International Hong Kong Ltd” (CIHK) which will be engaged in selling the Companies products Internationally and will provide other services such as, new product development, product sourcing, quality control, ocean freight logistics, product testing and factory certifications for the Companies other subsidiaries.

Nature of Business

Nature of Business

Since the beginning of fiscal year 2007, the Company has been primarily engaged in the business of developing, marketing and selling consumer products through national and regional retailers and distributors, in North America.  Capstone currently operates in four primary business segments: Induction Charged Power Failure Lights, Motion Sensor Lights, Portable Book and Task Lights and Door Security Monitor.  The Company’s products are typically manufactured in the Peoples’ Republic of China by third-party manufacturing companies.

Cash and Cash Equivalents Policy

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents, to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

An allowance for doubtful accounts is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for bad debts charged to earnings.  The allowance for bad debt is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the receivables.  This evaluation is inherently subjective and requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available.

As of June 30, 2013, management has determined that the accounts receivable are fully collectible.  As such, management has not recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts.

Inventory Policy

Inventory

The Company's inventory, which is recorded at lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market, consists of finished goods for resale by Capstone, totaling $546,705 and $584,370 at June 30 , 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Property and Equipment Policy

Property and Equipment

Fixed assets are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated economic useful lives of the related assets as follows:

Computer equipment	3 - 7 years
Computer software	3 - 7 years
Machinery and equipment	3 - 7 years
Furniture and fixtures	3 - 7 years

Long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable.  When required, impairment losses on assets to be held and used are recognized based on the fair value of the asset.  Long-lived assets to be disposed of, if any, are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.  No impairments were recognized by the Company during 2013 or through December 31, 2012.

Upon sale or other disposition of property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in the determination of income or loss.

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Major overhauls and betterments are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated economic useful lives.

Depreciation expense was $30,868 and $ 17,454  for the period ended June 30 , 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets acquired, either individually or with a group of other assets (but not those acquired in a business combination), are initially recognized and measured based on fair value.  Goodwill acquired in business combinations is initially computed as the amount paid by the acquiring company in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired.

The cost of internally developing, maintaining and restoring intangible assets (including goodwill) that are not specifically identifiable, that have indeterminate lives, or that are inherent in a continuing business and related to an entity as a whole, are recognized as an expense when incurred.

An intangible asset (excluding goodwill) with a definite useful life is amortized; an intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is not amortized until its useful life is determined to be no longer indefinite.  The remaining useful lives of intangible assets not being amortized are evaluated at least annually to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.

If and when an intangible asset is determined to no longer have an indefinite useful life, the asset shall then be amortized prospectively over its estimated remaining useful life and accounted for in the same manner as other intangibles that are subject to amortization.

An intangible asset (including goodwill) that is not subject to amortization shall be tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.  The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible assets with its carrying amount.  If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.  Goodwill is not amortized.

It is the Company's policy to test for impairment no less than annually, or when conditions occur that may indicate impairment.  The Company's intangible assets, which consist of goodwill of $1,936,020 recorded in connection with the Capstone acquisition, were tested for impairment and determined that no adjustment for impairment was necessary as of December 31, 2012, whereas the fair value of the intangible asset exceeds its carrying amount.

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share were computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year.  In periods where losses are reported, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.  At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the total number of potentially dilutive common stock equivalents was 159,946,577 and 155,446,577 respectively.

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 include the accounts of the parent entity and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Capstone Lighting Technologies, L.L.C (formerly Black Box Innovations, L.L.C.), Capstone Industries, Inc. and Capstone International HK, LTD.

The results of operations attributable to subsidiaries are included in the consolidated results of operations beginning on the date on which the Company’s interest in a subsidiary was acquired.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of the Company's financial instruments, including cash, prepaid expenses, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities at June 30, 2013 and 2012 approximates their fair values due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The fair value hierarchy under GAAP distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:

·   Level one — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

·   Level two — Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

·   Level three — Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter.

Cost Method of Accounting for Investment

Cost Method of Accounting for Investment

Investments in equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values and do not qualify for consolidation or the equity method are carried at cost.  Dividends received from those companies are included in other income.  Dividends received in excess of the Company’s proportionate share of accumulated earnings are applied as a reduction of the cost of the investment.  Other than temporary impairments to fair value are charged against current period income.

Reclassifications

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in the 2012 financial statements to conform to the 2013 presentation.  There were no material changes in classifications made to previously issued financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

Product sales are recognized when an agreement of sale exists, product delivery has occurred, pricing is final or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.

Allowances for sales returns, rebates and discounts are recorded as a component of net sales in the period the allowances are recognized.  In addition, accrued liabilities contained in the accompanying balance sheet include accruals for estimated amounts of credits to be issued in future years based on potentially defective product, other product returns and various allowances.  These estimates could change significantly in the near term.

Advertising and Promotion

Advertising and Promotion

Advertising and promotion costs, including advertising, public relations, and trade show expenses, are expensed as incurred and included in Sales and Marketing expenses.  Advertising and promotion expense was $53,699and $ 56,480 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  As of June 30, 2013 the company has $275,019 in capitalized advertising costs included in prepaid expenses on the balance sheet

Shipping and Handling

Shipping and Handling

The Company’s shipping and handling costs, are included in sales and marketing expenses and amounted to $56,954 and $50,587 for the six months ended June  30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities contained in the accompanying balance sheet include accruals for estimated amounts of credits to be issued in future years based on potentially defective products, other product returns and various allowances.  These estimates could change significantly in the near term.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 109 (SFAS 109), "Accounting for Income Taxes." SFAS 109 (now ASC 740) requires recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the expected future income tax consequences, based on enacted tax laws, of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company and its subsidiaries intend to file consolidated income tax returns.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payments, SFAS 123(R), (now ASC 718) which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options, based on estimated fair values.  ASC 718 supersedes the Company’s previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations, applied for periods through December 31, 2005.  In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) relating to ASC 718.  The Company has applied the provision of SAB 107 in its adoption of ASC 718.

The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective application transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006, the first day of the Company’s fiscal year.  The Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and later, reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R).  In accordance with the modified prospective method, the Company’s consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123(R).

SFAS 123(R) ASC 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of the grant using an option-pricing model.  The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expenses over the requisite service periods in the Company’s consolidated statements of income (loss).  Prior to the adoption of ASC 718, the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB 25, as allowed under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (SFAS 123).  Under the intrinsic value method, compensation expense under fixed term option plans was recorded at the date of grant only to the extent that the market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant exceeded the exercise price.  Accordingly, for those stock options granted for which the exercise price equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant, no expense was recorded.

Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period.  There was no stock-based compensation expense attributable to options for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not vested as of December 31, 2005.  Such stock-based compensation is based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS 123.  Compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, are based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718.

In conjunction with the adoption of ASC 718, the Company adopted the straight-line single option method of attributing the value of stock-based compensation expense.  As stock-based compensation expense is recognized during the period is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it is subject to reduction for estimated forfeitures.  ASC 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.  As of and for the year ended December 31, 2011, there were no material amounts subject to forfeiture.  The Company has not accelerated vesting terms of its out-of-the-money stock options, or made any other significant changes, prior to adopting ASC 718, Share-Based Payments.

On April 23, 2007, the Company granted 130,500,000 stock options to two officers of the Company.  The options vest at twenty percent per year beginning April 23, 2007.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized compensation expense of $503,075 related to these options.  On May 1, 2008, 850,000 of the above stock options were canceled and on May 23, 2008, 74,666,667 of the above stock options were cancelled.  For year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $405,198 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $156,557 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized a compensation expense of $156,558 related to these options. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized compensation expense of $52,186 related to these options. No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On May 1, 2007, the Company granted 4,000,000 stock options to five employees of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized compensation expense of $29,214 related to these options.  During 2008 and 2009, 1,500,000 of the above options were cancelled prior to vesting.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $25,131 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $10,869 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2009 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On October 22, 2007, the Company granted 700,000 stock options to a business associate of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized compensation expense of $1,330 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $7,978 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $6,648 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2009 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On January 10, 2008, the Company granted 1,000,000 stock options to an advisor of the Company.  The options vest over one year.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $19,953 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2008 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On February 5, 2008, the Company granted 3,650,000 stock options to four directors and one employee of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $59,619 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $2,603 related to these options.  As of December 31, 2009 these options were fully vested and compensation expense fully recognized.  During 2010, 3,500,000 of the above options expired.  No further compensation expense will be recognized for these options.

On May 1, 2008, the Company granted 850,000 stock options to an employee of the Company.  The options vest over two years.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $5,242 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $7,862 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $2,620 related to these options. No further expense will be recognized for these options.

On June 8, 2009, the Company granted 4,500,000 stock options to four directors of the Company. The options vest in one year.  For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized compensation expense of $42,663 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $33,837 related to these options. No further expense will be recognized for these options.  These options expired on June 8, 2011.

On April 23, 2010, the Company granted 4,800,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and the Company Secretary. The options vest in one year.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized compensation expense of $27,000 related to these options.  For the year ended December 31, 2011 the Company recognized compensation expense of $12,000.  No further expense will be recognized for these options.

On July 1, 2011, the Company granted 4,650,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and the Company Secretary. The options vest in one year. For the year ended December 31, 2011 the Company recognized compensation expense of $16,500.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized an expense of $16,500.  No further expense will be recognized for these options.

On August 6, 2012, the Company granted 4,650,000 stock options to four directors of the Company and the Company Secretary. The options vest in one year.  The Company Secretary left the Company and 150,000 stock options were cancelled. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense of $20,250.  For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized an expense of $20,250.  No further expense will be recognized for these options.

The Company recognizes compensation expense paid with common stock and other equity instruments issued for assets and services received based upon the fair value of the assets/services or the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily determined.

As of the date of this report the Company has not adopted a method to account for the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to ASC 718 and related interpretations.  However, whereas the Company has substantial net operating losses to offset future taxable income and its current deferred tax asset is completely reduced by the valuation allowance, no material tax effects are anticipated.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company valued stock options using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB 25.  Since the exercise price of stock options previously issued was greater than or equal to the market price on grant date, no compensation expense was recognized.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $20,250 and $16,500 respectively.

Recent Accounting Standards

Recent Accounting Standards

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-04 “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820).” The amendments in ASU 2011-04 change the wording used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments include (1) those that clarify the Board's intent about the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and (2) those that change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. In addition, to improve consistency in application across jurisdictions some changes in wording are necessary to ensure that U.S. GAAP and IFRS fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are described in the same way (for example, using the word shall rather than should to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP). The amendments that clarify the Board's intent about the application of  existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements include (a) the application of the highest and best use and valuation premise concepts, (b) measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entity's shareholders' equity, and (c) disclosures about fair value measurements that clarify that a reporting entity should disclose quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in a fair value measurement that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The amendments in this Update that change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements include (a) measuring the fair value of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio, (b) application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement, and (c) additional disclosures about fair value measurements that expand the disclosures about fair value measurements. The amendments in ASU 2011-04 are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-05 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).”  Under the amendments in this Update, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. In a single continuous statement, the entity is required to present the components of net income and total net income, the components of other comprehensive income and a total for other comprehensive income, along with the total of comprehensive income in that statement. In the two-statement approach, an entity is required to present components of net income and total net income in the statement of net income. The statement of other comprehensive income should immediately follow the statement of net income and include the components of other comprehensive income and a total for other comprehensive income, along with a total for comprehensive income.  The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments do not require any transition disclosures.  The Company’s adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-12 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).”  In order to defer only those changes in Update 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments, the paragraphs in this Update supersede certain pending paragraphs in Update 2011-05. The amendments are being made to allow the Board time to re-deliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the Board is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before Update 2011-05.All other requirements in Update 2011-05 are not affected by this Update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.  The Company’s adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment" ("ASU 2012-02"), which permits an entity to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit's indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than the asset's carrying value before applying the two-step goodwill impairment model that is currently in place. If it is determined through the qualitative assessment that the fair value of a reporting unit's indefinite-lived intangible asset is more likely than not greater than the asset's carrying value, the remaining impairment steps would be unnecessary. The qualitative assessment is optional, allowing companies to go directly to the quantitative assessment. ASU 2012-02 is effective for the Company for annual and interim indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed beginning October 1, 2012; however, early adoption is permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2012-02 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

The Company continually assesses any new accounting pronouncements to determine their applicability to the Company. Where it is determined that a new accounting pronouncement affects the Company’s financial reporting, the Company undertakes a study to determine the consequence of the change to its financial statements and assures that there are proper controls in place to ascertain that the Company’s financials properly reflect the change.

Pervasiveness of Estimates

Pervasiveness of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and the differences could be material.

XML

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies goodwill, Dilutive shares and inventory (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011	Sep. 13, 2006
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies goodwill, Dilutive shares and inventory
Goodwill recorded		$ 1,936,020			$ 1,936,020
Inventory finished goods for resale	$ 546,705	$ 584,370
Under the Stock Purchase Agreement the Company acquired issued and outstanding shares					100.00%
Potentially dilutive common stock Shares			159,946,577	155,446,577

XML

INCOME TAXES (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

INCOME TAXES (Tables)

Operating Loss Carry Forwards

	2012			2011
Net Operating (Profit) Losses	$	1,564,000		$	1,326,000
Valuation Allowance		(1,564,000	)		(1,326,000	)
	$	-		$	-

Provision for income taxes differ from the amount computed

The provision for income taxes differ from the amount computed using the federal US statutory income tax rate as follows:

	2012			2011
Provision (Benefit) at US Statutory Rate	$	(206,000	)	$	196,000
State Income Tax		-			(32,000	)
Depreciation and Amortization		(68,000	)		(60,000	)
Accrued Officer Compensation		-			14,000
Non-Deductible Stock Based Compensation		12,000			27,000
Other Differences		24,000			25,000
Increase (Decrease) in Valuation Allowance		238,000			(170,000	)
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)	$	-		$	-

XML

Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC.
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2013
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	0000814926
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	657,760,532
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2

XML

Other assets consists of the following (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Other assets consists of the following:

Other assets consists of the following

Other Assets at June 30, 2013 and 2012 consists of the following:

	2013			2012			Life in Years
Packaging Artwork and Design	$	298,804			255,817			2
Less:  Accumulated Amortization		(262,690	)		(236,204	)
	$	36,114			19,613

XML

INCOME TAXES Loss carryforward (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2012
INCOME TAXES Loss carryforward
Net operating Loss carry forward for income tax reporting purposes	$ 4,600,000

XML

INCOME TAXES Net Operating Loss Carryforward And Provision (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
INCOME TAXES Net Operating Loss Carryforward And Provision
Net operating loss carry forward	$ 4,600,000	$ 0
Net Operating (Profit) Losses	1,564,000	1,326,000
Valuation Allowance	(1,564,000)	(1,326,000)
Total operating loss carryforward	0	0
Provision (Benefit) at US Statutory Rate	(206,000)	196,000
State Income Tax	0	(32,000)
Depreciation and Amortization;	(68,000)	(60,000)
Accrued Officer Compensation	0	14,000
Non-Deductible Stock Based Compensation	12,000	27,000
Other Differences	24,000	25,000
Increase (Decrease) in Valuation Allowance	238,000	(170,000)
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)	$ 0	$ 0