form8k061708.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FORM
8-K
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT
REPORT
PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
DATE OF
REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED)
June 17,
2008
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CHDT
CORPORATION
(EXACT
NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
FLORIDA
|
0-28331
|
84-1047159
|
|
(State
of Incorporation or
|
(Commission
File Number)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
organization)
|
|
Identification
No.)
|
350 JIM
MORAN BLVD., #120
DEERFIELD
BEACH, FLORIDA 33442
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(954)
252-3440
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions:
|_|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act
(17 CFR 230.425)
|_|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 FR
240.14a-12)
|_|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|_|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
ITEM 8.01. Litigation
Update. CELESTE TRUST
REG., ESQUIRE TRADE, ET AL. V. CBQ, INC. (Second Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case #07-1701-CV, April 2007; Lower Court Case# 03 Civ. 9650 RMB; US
District Court, SDNY, 12/4/2003): Both the initial and amended
complaint of the plaintiffs in this case against us were dismissed by the trial
court upon our motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs perfected their
appeal of the dismissal of the amended complaint and the appeal was briefed in
November 2007. The appeal is currently pending before the Second
Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City. CHDT is uncertain when or how the
Second Circuit will rule on the plaintiffs’ appeal. CHDT has moved
that the Second Circuit to make a ruling on the briefs without oral arguments,
but CHDT believes that the plaintiffs have requested oral
arguments. There has been no ruling to date on the overall appeal or
CHDT’s motion for a ruling based solely on the written appeal briefs submitted
to date. CHDT intends to appeal any adverse ruling in this case
by the Second Circuit.
ITEM
9.01 Exhibits
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Reporting
Company as duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.
Dated:
June 17, 2008
CHDT
CORPORATION
/s/ Gerry
McClinton
Gerry
McClinton, Chief Operating Officer