10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004

COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-15981

HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia	54-1194795
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4951 Lake Brook Drive, Suite 500 Glen Allen, Virginia	23060
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(804) 747-6500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Class	Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, no par value	New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K  ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).    Yes  x    No  ¨

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

$1,224,599,513 as of June 30, 2004

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at March 1, 2005
Common Stock, no par value	36,182,345

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the registrant’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Parts I and II of this report.

Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year, are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

The Company

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company serves as an intermediary between its clients and insurance companies that underwrite client risks. With offices located throughout the United States and in London, England, the Company assists clients in managing their risks in areas such as property and casualty, employee benefits and other areas of specialized exposure.

“HRH” and the “Company” refer to Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and its consolidated subsidiaries on a combined basis unless the context requires otherwise.

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia in 1982. The Company is a holding company and operates through its subsidiaries. The Company has its principal executive office at 4951 Lake Brook Drive, Suite 500, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060. The Company maintains an internet website at www.hrh.com.

Shareholders of the Company and the public may access the Company’s periodic and current reports (including annual, quarterly and current reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, respectively, and any amendments to those reports), filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The reports are made available on the Company’s website as soon as practicable following the filing of such documents with the SEC. In addition, the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and the Charters of the Audit Committee, Corporate Governance Committee, and Human Resources and Compensation Committee are available to shareholders of the Company and the public. These documents are available through the “Investor Relations” section of the Company’s website, or printed copies are available upon written request to the Company’s Secretary at the address set forth above. The information is free of charge and may be reviewed, downloaded and printed from the website at any time.

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Among other things, these statements relate to the financial condition, results of operations and future business plans, operations, opportunities and prospects of the Company. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements in Form 10-K or other filings by the Company with the SEC, in the Company’s press releases or other public or shareholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized Company executive officer include the words or phrases “would be,” “will allow,” “expects to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions that are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

While forward-looking statements are provided to assist in the understanding of the Company’s anticipated future financial performance, the Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions

1

could prove to be inaccurate. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by such forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons. Risk factors and uncertainties that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the following: the Company’s commission revenues are highly dependent on premium rates charged by insurance underwriters, which are subject to fluctuation based on the prevailing economic conditions and competitive factors that affect insurance underwriters; the level of contingent commissions are difficult to predict and any decrease in the Company’s collection of them is likely to have an impact on operating results; the Company has eliminated override commissions effective for business written on or after January 1, 2005, and it is uncertain whether additional contingent commissions payable to the Company will offset the loss of such revenues; the Company’s continued growth has been enhanced through acquisitions, which may or may not be available on acceptable terms in the future and which, if consummated, may or may not be advantageous to the Company; the Company’s failure to integrate an acquired insurance agency efficiently may have an adverse effect on the Company; the general level of economic activity can have a substantial impact on revenues that is difficult to predict; a strong economic period may not necessarily result in higher revenues if the volume of insurance business brought about by favorable economic conditions is offset by premium rates that have declined in response to increased competitive conditions; if the Company is unable to respond in a timely and cost-effective manner to rapid technological change in the insurance intermediary industry, there may be a resulting adverse effect on business and operating results; the business practices and broker compensation arrangements of the Company and the insurance intermediary industry are subject to uncertainty due to investigations by various governmental authorities and related private litigation; and quarterly and annual variations in the Company’s commissions and fees that result from the timing of policy renewals and the net effect of new and lost business production may have unexpected impacts on the Company’s results of operations.

The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Overview

The Company’s client base ranges from personal to large national accounts and is primarily comprised of middle-market and major commercial and industrial accounts. Middle-market businesses are generally businesses that do not have internal risk management departments and outsource that function to an intermediary. Major accounts, which may have risk management departments, typically generate annual commissions and fees in excess of $100,000.

Insurance commissions (and fees in lieu of commission) accounted for approximately 94% of the Company’s total revenues in 2004. The Company also advises clients on risk management and employee benefits and provides claims administration and loss control consulting services to clients, which contributed approximately 4% of revenues in 2004.

The Company’s offices act as independent agents representing a large number of insurance companies, which gives the Company access to specialized products and capacity needed by its clients. Offices and regions are staffed to handle the broad variety of insurance needs of their clients. The Company also markets excess and surplus lines insurance, reinsurance, and specialty programs through its Managing General Agencies/Underwriters (MGA/MGU) to its own offices and other intermediaries.

The Company is organized under regional operating units to coordinate the efforts of several local offices in a geographic area to focus on markets, account retention, client service and new business production. The six U.S. regions are the Mid-Atlantic (Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Virginia); Northeast (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey and New York); Southeast (Alabama, Georgia and Florida); Central (Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas); West (Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, Oregon and Wyoming) and the Midwest (Illinois, Michigan, Nebraska and Wisconsin). By regionally managing and coordinating complementary resources, the Company has enabled each office to

2

address a broader spectrum of client needs and respond more quickly and expertly than each could do on a stand-alone basis. Operations were streamlined by merging multiple locations in the same city into a single profit center and converting smaller locations into sales offices of a larger profit center in the same region. The Company also has operating units specializing in excess and surplus lines brokerage (California, Florida, Illinois and Texas), MGA/MGU business (Colorado, Connecticut and Vermont) and reinsurance brokerage (Colorado and London, England). Additionally, the Company has coordinated national resources such as specialized industry or product expertise, claims management and loss control in order to deploy these resources as needed to offices, without regard to geographic boundaries, which will further enhance service capacity to larger and more complex clients.

The Company has established direct access to certain foreign insurance markets without the need to share commissions with excess and surplus lines brokers. This direct access allows the Company to enhance its revenues from insurance products written by foreign insurers and allows it to provide a broader array of insurance products to its clients.

The Company believes that a key to its success has been a strong emphasis on local client service by experienced personnel with established community relations. The Company’s offices have historically been largely decentralized with respect to client solicitation, account maintenance underwriting decisions, selection of insurance companies and areas of insurance specialization. The Company maintains centralized administrative functions, including cash management and investment, human resources and legal functions, through its corporate headquarters to allow the local office staff to focus on business production and retention. Accounting records and systems are maintained at each office, but the Company requires each office to comply with standardized financial reporting and control requirements. Through its internal auditing department, Company personnel periodically visit each office and monitor compliance with internal accounting controls and procedures.

The Company derives income primarily from commissions and fees on the sale of insurance products to clients paid by the insurance underwriters with whom the offices place their clients’ insurance. The Company acts as an agent in soliciting, negotiating and effecting contracts of insurance through insurance companies and occasionally as a broker in procuring contracts of insurance on behalf of insureds. In the past three years, the Company has derived in excess of 90% of its commission and fee revenue from the sale of insurance products, principally property and casualty and employee benefits insurance. Accordingly, no breakdown by industry segments has been made. The balance is primarily derived from service fee income related to claims management and loss control services, program administration and workers compensation consultative service. Within its range of services, the Company also places surplus lines coverages (coverages not available from insurance companies licensed by the states in which the risks are located) with surplus lines insurers for various specialized risks.

Insurance agents’ commissions are generally a percentage of the premium paid by the client. Commission rates vary substantially within the insurance industry. Commissions depend upon a number of factors, including the type of insurance, the amount of the premium, the particular insurer, the capacity in which the Company acts and the scope of the services it renders to the client. In some cases, the Company is compensated by a fee paid directly by the client. The Company has historically received contingent and override commissions from various underwriters. Contingent commissions are commissions paid by underwriters based on profitability of the business, premium growth, total premium volume or some combination of these factors. Contingent commissions are generally received in the first and second quarters of each year which accordingly, may cause earnings for those quarters to vary from other quarterly results. Override commissions are commissions paid by insurance underwriters in excess of the standard commission rates on specific classes of business. These amounts are paid as a percentage of certain classes of business and are recorded as earned. Effective for business written on or after January 1, 2005, these national override commissions reverted into industry standard local contingency agreements with those insurance underwriters.

3

The Company provides a variety of professional services to assist clients in analyzing risks and in determining whether protection against risks is best obtained through the purchase of insurance or through retention of all, or a portion of those risks, and the adoption of risk management policies and cost-effective loss control and prevention programs.

No material part of the Company’s business is dependent on a single client or on a few clients, and the Company does not depend on a single industry or type of client for a substantial amount of its business. In 2004, the largest single client accounted for approximately 0.5% of the Company’s total revenues.

Recent Industry Developments

On October 14, 2004, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York (NYAG) filed a lawsuit against Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and its subsidiary Marsh Inc. (collectively Marsh), the world’s largest insurance broker, alleging statutory and common law fraud, securities fraud, bid-rigging and other antitrust violations in the placement of insurance business. On March 4, 2005, the NYAG filed a lawsuit against Aon Corporation (Aon), the world’s second largest insurance broker, alleging fraudulent business practices, common law fraud and securities fraud in connection with conduct of its placement of insurance business. Marsh and Aon have each announced settlement agreements with the NYAG and certain state regulators. Under the terms of the agreements, Marsh and Aon are required to establish settlement funds in the amount of $850 million and $190 million, respectively, to compensate U.S. policyholder clients who retained Marsh and Aon to place insurance with inception or renewal dates between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2004, where such policies resulted in Marsh and Aon recording contingent or override commissions.

The Marsh and Aon settlement agreements also place restrictions on the future business practices of these companies. Marsh and Aon may no longer accept (i) any contingent compensation for services in placing, renewing, consulting on or servicing any insurance policy and (ii) any compensation other than a specific fee to be paid by the client, a specific percentage commission on premiums to be paid by the insurer set at the time of the purchase, renewal, placement or servicing of the policy, or both types of compensation. If Marsh or Aon receives any commission, it must disclose to the client that it intends to collect the commission and obtain the client’s written consent prior to the binding of the policy.

As of the date of this report, the Company has not received a subpoena from the NYAG. However, as a result of the NYAG’s lawsuits against Marsh and Aon, controversy now surrounds the longstanding insurance industry practice of contingent and override commissions paid to agents and brokers by underwriters. A committee of the Company’s Board of Directors was previously authorized to perform an independent review concerning the Company’s practices in the areas that are the subject of the NYAG’s allegations against Marsh. This committee has engaged outside legal counsel to assist it in the review.

In addition to the ongoing investigation by the NYAG, other state attorneys general and insurance departments have been making inquiries into, among other things, the industry’s commission payment practices. In October 2004, the Company received a subpoena from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Connecticut (CTAG), as part of the CTAG’s investigation of possible antitrust violations. The CTAG’s subpoena requests information concerning various business practices, including contingent commissions. The Company also has received subpoenas from the attorneys general in Florida, Massachusetts and North Carolina requesting information regarding business practices. In addition, the Company has received requests for information from state insurance departments in ten states, and the Company may receive additional subpoenas and/or requests for information in the future from attorneys general and/or insurance departments of other states. It is the Company’s understanding that numerous others in the insurance industry have also received such subpoenas and requests for information. The Company will evaluate, and intends to cooperate fully in connection with, all such subpoenas and requests.

The Company has historically entered into contingent and override commission agreements with various underwriters. Contingent commissions are commissions paid by underwriters based on profitability of the business, premium growth, total premium volume or some combination of these factors. Revenue from contingent commissions is heavily weighted in the first and second quarters. Override commissions are typically volume-based commissions paid by underwriters in excess of the standard commission rates on specific classes of business.

4

For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company recognized $42.4 million and $40.8 million, respectively, in contingent and override commissions. Of the 2004 amount, approximately 81% was from standard contingency agreements maintained at the local office level, and approximately 19% was from specially negotiated volume-based national override agreements, which are also in keeping with industry norms. Effective for business written on or after January 1, 2005, these national override agreements, which were paid quarterly when earned, reverted into standard local contingency arrangements with those underwriters, which will be paid and recorded annually beginning in early 2006. There can be no assurance that the loss of override commissions resulting from the reversion to standard local contingency arrangements will be offset by additional contingent commissions in future periods.

The Company intends to monitor broker compensation practices and, as warranted by market and regulatory developments, will review its compensation arrangements with underwriters. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of the governmental inquiries into the insurance industry’s commission payment practices or the market’s response thereto, any material decrease in the Company’s contingent commissions is likely to have a negative effect on its results of operations.

In addition to state regulatory inquiries, the Company has been named as a defendant in three purported class action suits brought against a number of brokers in the insurance industry. For information on industry litigation, see Part I, Item 3 – “Legal Proceedings.”

Operating History and Acquisition Program

The Company was formed in 1982 to acquire and operate an existing insurance agency network. At that time, the Company undertook a program of consolidating agencies, closing or selling unprofitable locations and acquiring new agencies. Since 1984, over 220 independent agencies have been acquired. The purchase price of an agency is typically paid in cash, common stock and/or deferred payments of cash or common stock.

Since 1997, the Company’s acquisition program has been focused on independent intermediaries that fit into its current operating models and strategic plans, targeting entities that strengthen its regions and middle-market and major account positions or add to its specialty lines of business and increase its range of services. In 2004, the Company focused on acquisitions to expand capacity in its Midwest region and MGA/MGU business.

The Company has substantial experience in acquiring insurance agencies. Generally, each acquisition candidate is subjected to a due diligence process in which the Company evaluates the quality and reputation of the business and its management, revenues and earnings, specialized products and expertise, administrative and accounting records, growth potential and location. For candidates that pass this screening process, the Company uses a pricing method that emphasizes pro forma revenues, profits and tangible net worth. As a condition to completing an acquisition, the Company requires that the principals be subject to restrictive covenants. Once the acquisition is consummated, the Company takes steps to introduce its procedures and to integrate the agency’s systems and employees into the Company.

Competition

The Company participates in a very competitive industry. Competition is primarily based on price, service, relationships and expertise. The Company is the seventh largest insurance and risk management intermediary firm in the United States serving a wide variety of clients through its offices located in 29 states. Many of the Company’s competitors are larger and have greater resources than the Company and operate on an international scale. Four of these competitors are significantly larger, having more than double the commissions and/or fee revenues of the Company.

5

In some of the offices’ cities, because no major national insurance broker has established a presence, the Company competes with local agents and private, regional firms, some of which may be larger than the Company’s local office.

The Company is also in competition with certain insurance companies that write insurance directly for their clients, the banking industry, as well as self-insurance and other employer-sponsored programs.

Employees

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately 3,700 employees. No employees are currently represented by a union. The Company believes its relations with its employees are good.

Regulation

In every state in which the Company does business, the applicable office or employee is required to be licensed or to have received regulatory approval by the state insurance department in order for the Company to conduct business. In addition to licensing requirements applicable to the Company, most jurisdictions require individuals who engage in brokerage and certain insurance service activities to be licensed personally.

The Company’s operations depend on the validity of and its continued good standing under the licenses and approvals pursuant to which it operates. Licensing laws and regulations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In all jurisdictions, the applicable licensing laws and regulations are subject to amendment or interpretation by regulatory authorities, and generally such authorities are vested with general discretion as to the grant, renewal and revocation of licenses and approvals.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company leases its Headquarters’ office in Glen Allen, Virginia. The Company’s subsidiaries also conduct their business operations from leased office space in various states where located. Information on the Company’s lease commitments is incorporated by reference to the material contained in “Note G-Leases” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the portions of the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders set forth as Exhibit 13 hereto. The Company believes that its properties are in good condition and are suitable and adequate for its purposes.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Except as described below, the Company has no material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary, routine litigation incidental to the business, to which it or a subsidiary is a party. With respect to the routine litigation, upon the advice of counsel, management believes that none of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, if determined adversely to the Company, would have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company or its ability to carry on its business as currently conducted.

The Company has been named as a defendant in certain legal proceedings against brokers and insurers relating to broker compensation arrangements and other business practices. In August 2004, OptiCare Health Systems Inc. filed a putative class action suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 04-CV-06954) against a number of the country’s largest insurance brokers, including the Company, and several large commercial insurers. In the amended complaint, the plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the broker defendants engaged in improper steering of clients to the insurer defendants for the purpose of

6

obtaining undisclosed additional compensation in the form of commissions from insurers; that the defendants were engaged in a bid-rigging scheme involving the submission of false and/or inflated bids from insurers to clients; and that the broker defendants entered into unlawful tying arrangements to obtain reinsurance business from the defendant insurers. The plaintiff alleges violations of federal and state antitrust laws, conspiracy and violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and (d), fraudulent concealment, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and violation of state unfair and deceptive practices statutes. The plaintiff seeks monetary relief, including treble damages, an injunction, costs and other relief. On February 17, 2005, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the Panel) ordered that this case, along with three other purported antitrust class actions filed in New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania against industry participants, be centralized and transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Company has not yet filed a responsive pleading in this case but believes it has substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend itself vigorously.

In December 2004, two other purported class action suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, by Stephen Lewis (Case No. 04-C-7847) and Diane Preuss (Case No. 04-C-7853), respectively, against certain insurance brokers, including the Company, and several large commercial insurers. Neither complaint has been served on the Company. In the complaints, plaintiffs allege, among other things, that the defendants were involved in a scheme to manipulate the market for commercial insurance by steering clients to the insurer defendants for the purpose of obtaining undisclosed additional compensation in the form of commissions from insurers and by engaging in a bid-rigging scheme using false and/or inflated bids from insurers to clients. The plaintiffs allege violations of federal and state antitrust laws, conspiracy and violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and (d), fraudulent concealment, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and violation of state unfair and deceptive practices statutes. The plaintiffs seek monetary relief, including treble damages, an injunction, costs and other relief. These two lawsuits were not specifically identified in the order issued by the Panel transferring the OptiCare litigation to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, as noted above, but the Panel noted in its order that additional related actions had been filed in certain other jurisdictions, including cases in the Northern District of Illinois, and that those actions would be treated as potential “tag-along” actions. Accordingly, the Lewis and Preuss cases also may be subject to transfer by the Panel. The Company believes it has substantial defenses to the claims made in the Lewis and Preuss cases and intends to defend itself vigorously.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

7

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The executive officers of the registrant are as follows:

Martin L. Vaughan, III, 57, has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since May 2003. He has been a Director of the Company since 1999. Prior thereto, he was President of the Company from 2000 to 2003 and Chief Operating Officer from 1999 to 2003. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of American Phoenix Corporation from 1990 to 1999.

Robert B. Lockhart, 54, has been President and Chief Operating Officer since August 2003 and a Director of the Company since 2003. He was Vice President of the Company and Director of the Northeast Region from 1999 to 2003. He was President of American Phoenix Corporation of Connecticut from 1996 to 1999.

Michael Crowley, 53, has been Executive Vice President, National Director for Property and Casualty since October 2004. Prior thereto, he was Vice Chairman of Palmer & Cay, Inc. from 2002 to 2004 and President and Chief Operating Officer of Palmer & Cay, Inc. from 1998 to 2002.

Timothy J. Korman, 52, has been Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration since 1997 and has been a Director of the Company since 1999. He is a first cousin of Robert S. Ukrop, a Director of the Company.

Carolyn Jones, 49, has been Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since 1997 and was Vice President and Controller of the Company from 1991 to 1997.

Walter L. Smith, 47, has been Senior Vice President of the Company since 2001. He has been General Counsel of the Company since 1988 and Secretary of the Company since 1998. He was Vice President from 1991 to 2001 and he was Assistant Secretary of the Company from 1989 to 1998.

William L. Chaufty, 52, has been Vice President of the Company since 1998. He has been Director of the Central Region since 1997 and was President of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Oklahoma, a subsidiary of the Company, from 1989 to 2000.

Steven C. Deal, 51, has been Vice President of the Company since 1998. He has been Director of the Mid-Atlantic Region since 2000. He was National Director of Select Commercial Operations from 1997 until 2000 and National Director of Personal Lines from 1998 until 2000. He has also been Chairman of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Virginia, a subsidiary of the Company, since 1997. He was President of this subsidiary from 1990 to 1997.

Michael A. Janes, 46, has been Vice President of the Company since 1998. He has been Director of the West Region since 1997 and Chairman of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Arizona, a subsidiary of the Company, since 1998. He was President of this subsidiary from 1993 to 1998.

Karl E. Manke, 58, has been Vice President, National Director, Select and Personal Lines of the Company since 2003. Prior thereto, he was Vice President, Marketing and Sales Development of the Company from 1999 to 2003.

Peter E. Marcia, 40, has been Vice President, National Director of Employee Benefits since November 2003. Prior thereto, he was Managing Director of Hobbs Group, LLC Employee Benefits from 1999 to 2003.

8

Kimberly A. McGillicuddy, 46, has been Vice President and Director of the Northeast Region since November 2003. Prior thereto, she was President of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Connecticut, LLC from 1999 until November 2003.

John P. McGrath, 47, has been Vice President and Director of the Midwest Region since November 2003. He was Senior Vice President – Business and Product Development from 1999 to 2003 and was Vice President of the Company from 1998 to 1999. He was Director of the Mid-Atlantic Region from 1995 to 2000 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Pittsburgh from 1993 to 1998.

Robert S. O’Brien, 48, has been Vice President, Production and Sales Development since August 2003. Prior thereto, he was Senior Vice President of Marketing for Hobbs Group, LLC from 2002 to 2003, Vice President of Marketing from 2001 to 2002 and Vice President of Market Integration from 2000 to 2001. He was Director of Sales for Bay Technology Group, a division of Hobbs Group, LLC, from 1999 to 2000.

J. Thomas Stiles, 54, has been Vice President and Director of the Southeast Region of the Company since June 2004. Prior thereto, he was a Senior Vice President of the Hobbs Group, LLC from 1997 to 2004.

Robert W. Blanton, Jr., 40, has been Vice President and Controller of the Company since 1998. He was Assistant Vice President and Controller from 1997 to 1998 and was Assistant Vice President of the Company from 1993 to 1997.

Christopher T. Hearn, 34, has been Vice President, Financial Reporting since February 2004. He was Assistant Vice President, Financial Reporting from 2002 to 2003. Prior thereto, he held various positions at Ernst & Young LLP from 1993 to 2002.

Vincent P. Howley, 56, has been Vice President, Agency Financial Operations since 1997. He was Vice President, Audit of the Company from 1993 to 1997.

A. Brent King, 36, has been Vice President and Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of the Company since 2001. Prior thereto, he was an attorney at Williams Mullen from 1994 to 2001.

Henry C. Kramer, 60, has been Vice President, Human Resources since 1997. Prior thereto, he held various human resource positions with Alexander & Alexander, Inc. in Baltimore, Maryland from 1973 to 1997.

William C. Widhelm, 36, has been Vice President, Internal Audit since 2001. He was Assistant Vice President, Internal Audit from 1999 to 2001. He joined the Company in 1994 and has held various positions in the auditing department.

All officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Each holds office until the next annual election of officers by the Board of Directors, which will occur after the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, scheduled to be held on May 3, 2005, or until their successors are elected. There are no family relationships nor any arrangements or understandings between any officer and any other person pursuant to which any such officer was selected, except as noted above.

9

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

(a) The Company’s Common Stock has been publicly traded since July 15, 1987. It is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “HRH.” As of December 31, 2004, there were 502 holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock.

The following table sets forth the reported high and low sales prices per share of the Common Stock on the NYSE Composite Tape, based on published financial sources, and the dividends per share declared on Common Stock for the quarter indicated.

Quarter Ended	Sales Price				Cash Dividends Declared
	High		Low
2004
March 31	$	38.33	$	31.19	$	0.0925
June 30		38.92		34.61		0.1050
September 30		37.01		32.26		0.1050
December 31		37.64		30.77		0.1050
2003
March 31	$	43.89	$	28.41	$	0.0900
June 30		37.20		31.24		0.0925
September 30		35.80		29.20		0.0925
December 31		32.73		27.16		0.0925

The Company’s current dividend policy anticipates the payment of quarterly dividends in the future. The declaration and payment of dividends to holders of Common Stock will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon the future earnings and financial condition of the Company.

The Company’s current credit facility limits the payment of cash dividends and other distributions on the Common Stock of the Company. The Company may not make dividend payments or other distributions during any fiscal year exceeding the consolidated net income for the immediately preceding fiscal year.

10

(c) The following table sets forth the details of purchases of Common Stock under the publicly announced share-repurchase program (the 2004 Program) that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2004:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program	Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program
October 2004	30,000	$	31.80	30,000	$	31,745,000
November 2004	403,400	$	32.77	403,400	$	18,526,000
Total	433,400	$	32.70	433,400

The 2004 Program was announced by the Company on March 31, 2004 and provides for the Company to purchase up to $50.0 million of its Common Stock annually, increasing the prior $20.0 million annual authorization. The repurchases may be made on the open market or in negotiated transactions, with the timing and amount of the transactions to be determined by the Company’s management subject to market conditions and other factors.

Not included in the above table are purchases outside of the 2004 Program that were made on behalf of a trust maintained by the Company for the Executive Voluntary Deferral Plan and the Outside Directors Deferral Plan. Total number of shares purchased during the quarter was 5,416, at an average price per share of $34.59.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Information as to selected financial data is incorporated by reference to the material under the heading “Selected Financial Data” in the portions of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders set forth as Exhibit 13 hereto.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Information as to management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is incorporated by reference to the material under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the portions of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders set forth as Exhibit 13 hereto.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company believes that its exposure to market risk associated with transactions using variable rate debt, certain investments and derivative financial instruments is not material.

11

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, selected quarterly financial data and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statements are incorporated by reference to the material under those headings in the portions of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders set forth as Exhibit 13 hereto.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the Securities and Exchange Commission. As of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of such period.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Company’s financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management has conducted an assessment of the design and effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that also audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting are incorporated by reference to the portions of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders set forth as Exhibit 13 hereto. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2004, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

12

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Except for certain information regarding executive officers included in Part I and the matters set forth below, the information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted codes of ethics that apply to all its directors, officers (including its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and any person performing similar functions) and employees. The codes of ethics contain provisions relating to honest and ethical conduct (including the handling of conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships), the preparation of full, fair, accurate and timely disclosure in reports and documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by the Company, compliance with governmental laws, rules and regulations and other matters. Shareholders of the Company and the public may obtain a copy from the “Investor Relations” section of the Company’s website at www.hrh.com or request a free copy from Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, Attention: Investor Relations, 4951 Lake Brook Drive, Suite 500, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060. Any amendment to or waiver from a provision of the code of ethics relating to directors and executive officers will be promptly disclosed on the Company’s website.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Except for certain information set forth under the captions “Human Resources & Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation” and “Performance Graph,” the information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to the material under the heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year.

13

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed 120 days after the end of the fiscal year.

14

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) (1) and (2). The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report.

(3) 2004 Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Document
3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 11, 2003, File No. 0-15981)
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 11, 2003, File No. 0-15981)
10.1	Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 11, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated November 21, 2003, File No. 333-110666)
10.2	Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company 1989 Stock Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-15981)
10.3	Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Non-employee Directors Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-15981)
10.4	Amended and Restated Voting and Standstill Agreement dated as of November 7, 2002 made by and among the Company, The Phoenix Companies, Inc., Phoenix Life Insurance Company and PM Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, File No. 0-15981)

15

Exhibit No.	Document
10.5	Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Executive Voluntary Deferral Plan, as amended and restated effective November 25, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated March 28, 2003, File No. 333-103262)
10.6	Form of Change of Control Employment Agreement for the following executive officers: Timothy J. Korman, Robert B. Lockhart, Martin L. Vaughan, III, Carolyn Jones, Walter L. Smith, Vincent P. Howley, Henry C. Kramer, Robert W. Blanton, Jr., A. Brent King, William C. Widhelm and F. Michael Crowley (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-15981)
10.7	Form of Change of Control Employment Agreement for the following executive officers: John P. McGrath, William C. Chaufty, Steven C. Deal, Michael A. Janes, J. Thomas Stiles, Karl E. Manke, Kimberly A. McGillicuddy, Richard F. Galardini, Peter E. Marcia and Robert S. O’Brien (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 0-15981)
10.8	Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement between the Company and Robert H. Hilb (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, File No. 0-15981)
10.9	First Amendment to Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement between the Company and Robert H. Hilb (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated August 13, 2003, File No. 0-15981)
10.10	Senior Executive Employment Agreement of Martin L. Vaughan, III, dated May 6, 2003, by and between the Company and Martin L. Vaughan, III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File No. 0-15981)

16

Exhibit No.	Document
10.11	Form of Regional Director Employment Agreement for the following executive officers: John P. McGrath and J. Thomas Stiles*
10.12	Form of First Amendment to Change of Control Employment Agreement for the following executive officers: Timothy J. Korman, Robert B. Lockhart, Martin L. Vaughan, III, Carolyn Jones, Walter L. Smith, Vincent P. Howley, Henry C. Kramer, Robert W. Blanton, Jr., A. Brent King, William C. Widhelm, F. Michael Crowley, John P. McGrath, William C. Chaufty, Steven C. Deal, Michael A. Janes, J. Thomas Stiles, Karl E. Manke, Kimberly A. McGillicuddy, Richard F. Galardini, Peter E. Marcia and Robert S. O’Brien *
10.13	Senior Executive Employment Agreement of Timothy J. Korman dated December 1, 2001 by and between Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company and Timothy J. Korman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, File No. 0-15981)
10.14	Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Outside Directors Deferral Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Form S-8 dated February 12, 2002, File No. 333-74344)
10.15	Senior Executive Employment Agreement of Robert B. Lockhart dated December 1, 2003 by and between the Company and Robert B. Lockhart (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File No. 0-15981)
10.16	2001 form of Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Employee Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement with schedule of optionees and amounts of options granted (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 0-15981)

17

Exhibit No.	Document
10.17	2001 form of Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Restricted Stock Agreement with schedule of grantees and amounts of restricted stock granted (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 0-15981)
10.18	2002 form of Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with schedule of optionees and amounts of options granted (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, File No. 0-15981)
10.19	2002 form of Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Restricted Stock Agreement with schedule of grantees and amounts of restricted stock granted (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, File No. 0-15981)
10.20	2003 form of Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with schedule of optionees and amounts of options granted (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, File No. 0-15981)
10.21	2003 form of Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Restricted Stock Agreement with schedule of grantees and amounts of restricted stock granted (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, File No. 0-15981)
10.22	2004 form of Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with schedule of optionees and amounts of options granted (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File No. 0-15981)
10.23	2004 form of Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Restricted Stock Agreement with schedule of grantees and amounts of restricted stock granted (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File No. 0-15981)

18

Exhibit No.	Document
10.24	2005 form of Hilb Rogal Hobbs Company Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with schedule of optionees and amounts of options granted*
10.25	2005 form of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company Restricted Stock Agreement with schedule of grantees and amounts of restricted stock granted*
10.26	Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated, effective January 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, File No. 0-15981)
10.27	Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated, effective November 25, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated February 13, 2003, File No. 333-103191)
10.28	Retirement Agreement by and between the Company and Andrew L. Rogal dated March 25, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, File No. 0-15981)
10.29	Severance Agreement by and between the Company and Thomas A. Golub dated August 5, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, File No. 0-15981)
10.30	Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Martin L. Vaughan, III, dated May 6, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, File No. 0-15981)
10.31	Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company 2003 Restricted Stock Agreement between the Company and Martin L. Vaughan, III, dated May 6, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, File No. 0-15981)

19

Exhibit No.	Document
10.32	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 15, 2004, among the Company, as Borrower; the banks named therein as Lenders; Wachovia Bank, National Association, as administrative agent; PNC Bank, National Association and SunTrust Bank, as documentation agents; and Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 15, 2004, File No. 0-15981)
10.33	2005 Corporate Incentive Plan effective February 7, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated March 11, 2005, File No. 0-15981)
13	Portions of 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders*
18.1	Letter from Independent Auditors regarding preferability of accounting principle change (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 18.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, File No. 0-15981)
21	Subsidiaries of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company*
23	Consent of Ernst & Young LLP*
31.1	Certification Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a)*
31.2	Certification Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a)*
32.1	Certification Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350*
32.2	Certification Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350*

* Filed Herewith

(b) Exhibits

The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report.

20

(c) Financial Statement Schedules

The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report.

21

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant, Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY
By:	/s/ Martin L. Vaughan, III
	Martin L. Vaughan, III
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date:	March 14, 2005

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Martin L. Vaughan, III Martin L. Vaughan, III	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)	March 14, 2005
/s/ Carolyn Jones Carolyn Jones	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)	March 14, 2005
/s/ Robert W. Blanton, Jr. Robert W. Blanton, Jr.	Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)	March 14, 2005
/s/ Robert B. Lockhart Robert B. Lockhart	President, Chief Operating Officer and Director	March 14, 2005
/s/ Timothy J. Korman Timothy J. Korman	Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Director	March 14, 2005
/s/ Robert H. Hilb Robert H. Hilb	Chairman Emeritus and Director	March 14, 2005
/s/ Robert S. Ukrop Robert S. Ukrop	Director	March 14, 2005

22

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Thomas H. O’Brien	Director	March 14, 2005
Thomas H. O’Brien
/s/ J. S. M. French	Director	March 14, 2005
J. S. M. French
/s/ Norwood H. Davis, Jr.	Director	March 14, 2005
Norwood H. Davis, Jr.
/s/ Theodore L. Chandler, Jr.	Director	March 14, 2005
Theodore L. Chandler, Jr.
/s/ Anthony F. Markel	Director	March 14, 2005
Anthony F. Markel
/s/ Robert W. Fiondella	Director	March 14, 2005
Robert W. Fiondella
/s/ Julious P. Smith, Jr.	Director	March 14, 2005
Julious P. Smith, Jr.
/s/ Warren M. Thompson	Director	March 14, 2005
Warren M. Thompson

23

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

ITEM 8, ITEM 9A, ITEMS 15 (a)(1) AND (2) AND (c)

INDEX OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

CERTAIN EXHIBITS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY

GLEN ALLEN, VIRGINIA

24

HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statements is included on page 26 of this Form 10-K and the following consolidated financial statements of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and subsidiaries, included in the portions of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders that are incorporated by reference in Item 8 of this report:

Consolidated Balance Sheet, December 31, 2004 and 2003

Statement of Consolidated Income,
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

Statement of Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity,
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows,
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting are included in the portions of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders that are incorporated by reference in Item 9a of this report.

The following consolidated financial statement schedule of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and subsidiaries is included in Item 15(c):

		Page Number
Schedule II	Valuation and Qualifying Accounts	27

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

25

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statements

Shareholders and Board of Directors

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(c). These financial statements are the responsibility of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note B to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 the Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company changed its method of accounting for commissions on premiums billed and collected directly by insurance companies on its middle-market property and casualty business.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 14, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, VA

March 14, 2005

26

HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY

AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

(in thousands)

Col. A	Col. B		Col. C					Col. D			Col. E
			Additions
Description	Balance at Beginning of Period		Charged to Costs and Expenses		Charged to Other Accounts (Describe)			Deductions (Describe)			Balance at End of Period
Year ended December 31, 2004:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	4,243	$	1,588	$	136	(b)	$	1,337	(e)	$	4,630
Year ended December 31, 2003:
Allowance for doubtful accounts		5,567		1,362		184	(b)		2,870	(d)		4,243
Year ended December 31, 2002:
Allowance for doubtful accounts		3,374		1,745		1,859	(c)		1,411	(a)		5,567

(a) Bad debts written off

(b) Recoveries

(c) Recoveries ($142) and from acquisitions ($1,717)

(d) Bad debts written off ($1,358) and from acquisitions ($1,512)

(e) Bad debts written off ($1,105) and from acquisitions ($232)

27

EX-10.11

Exhibit 10.11

REGIONAL DIRECTOR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT, dated             ,             , is made between HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY, a Virginia corporation (“Employer”) publicly held and traded on the New York Stock Exchange, and              (“Employee”).

WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, Employer owns a number of subsidiaries which operate full-line insurance agencies all over the United States and which are organized, and report to Employer, regionally;

WHEREAS, Employee has been selected to be promoted to the position of Regional Director of the Southeast region of Employer;

WHEREAS, Employer desires that Employee operate the Southeast region, with an emphasis on maximizing the profitability of each office in the Southeast region, developing an exceptional sales force and culture, and supporting other corporate goals, initiatives and lines of business, all as may be set from time-to-time by Employer;

WHEREAS, Employer will provide Employee with tools necessary to perform the services contemplated herein, including, without limitation, office, administrative and clerical support, access to domestic and international markets, access to Confidential Information (as hereinafter defined) and access to HRH’s business plans, strategies and capabilities;

WHEREAS, Employee will be considered an “insider” of Employer for securities law purposes and will be compensated pursuant to plans and policies overseen presently by the Human Resources & Compensation Committee (“Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Employer, which compensation package presently includes a combination of salary, bonus incentives, restricted stock, nonqualified stock options and such other perks and benefits as established by the Committee, all of which elements of compensation are subject to change from time-to-time by the Committee or the Board of Employer, expressly in exchange for Employee agreeing to perform the duties and to abide by the restrictive covenants set forth herein;

WHEREAS, Employer would neither compensate Employee at the levels contemplated herein, nor cause Employee to be promoted to this position herein, without Employee agreeing to abide by paragraphs 4, 5, 6 and 7 herein;

WHEREAS, Employee, as a business leader and “insider” of Employer, will be expected to comply with Employer’s policies and initiatives, including, without limitation, ownership of Employer stock, as may be established from time-to-time; and

Page 1

WHEREAS, Employee desires to accept this new position and these new terms of employment subject to the terms, covenants and conditions specified herein;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises stated above, Employer’s promotion of Employee to a new position, and the mutual promises contained in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

1. EMPLOYMENT. Employer agrees to employ Employee as             , effective as of             ,              (“Effective Date”). Employee’s employment hereunder is at will and may be terminated at any time by Employer or Employee.

2. FULL EFFORTS OF EMPLOYEE. Employee represents to Employer that Employee has no employment or other relationship with any competitor of Employer which would restrict Employee in performing the duties contemplated herein, as such exists now and may exist from time-to-time in the future. Employee agrees to indemnify and hold Employer harmless from all claims and damages (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs) suffered by Employer and arising out of a breach of the foregoing representation. Employee agrees (i) to devote Employee’s full business time and energies to the business and affairs of Employer, (ii) to use Employee’s best efforts, skills and abilities to promote the interests of the Employer and the related business interests of HRH and its other subsidiaries and (iii) to perform faithfully and to the best of Employee’s ability all assignments of work given to Employee by Employer. During the course of Employee’s employment hereunder, Employee shall not, directly or indirectly, enter into or engage in any other business activity or other gainful employment without the prior written consent of HRH.

3. FULL COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES. All business, including insurance, bond, risk management, self-insurance and any other services (collectively, the “HRH Business”), transacted through the efforts of Employee or any other employee of Employer or any of its subsidiaries (Employer and its subsidiaries are herein referred to as the “HRH Companies”) shall be the sole property of the HRH Companies, and Employee acknowledges that Employee shall have no right to any commission or fee resulting from the conduct of such business other than in the form of compensation as established by the Committee or Board. Premiums, commissions or fees on the HRH Business transacted through the efforts of Employee, whether received from an insured or purchaser or from one of the companies represented by the HRH Companies or Employee, are at all times the sole property of the HRH Companies. All checks or bank drafts received by Employee from any company, insured or purchaser shall be made payable to Employer (or applicable company of the HRH Companies) and all amounts collected by Employee shall be promptly turned over to Employer (or applicable company of the HRH Companies). Employee covenants to cooperate with Employer, and to take all actions reasonably requested by Employer, whenever Employer attempts to verify that all income has been paid to the HRH

Page 2

Companies and whenever Employer, before or after termination of Employee’s employment, desires to have commissions from HRH Business assigned to another employee or HRH Company.

4. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. For purposes of this Agreement, “Confidential Information” shall mean any and all information of a proprietary or confidential nature and trade secrets of Employer and the HRH Companies. Confidential information shall include, but not be limited to, such confidential information related to Employer’s plans, strategies and capabilities, personnel of the HRH Companies, information about the Customers (as defined below) such as customer identities and lists, revenues from customers’ accounts, customer risk characteristics and requirements, key contact personnel, financial data and performance, payroll, policy expiration dates, policy terms, conditions and rates, information about prospective customers, and information about the HRH Companies such as strategic plans, methods of soliciting business, documents, financial data, business plans and strategies, marketing programs and specialized insurance markets. Confidential information may be acquired from any source during Employee’s term of employment, whether or not such information was expressly disclosed to Employee during the term of Employee’s employment;

Employee acknowledges that, in the course of Employee’s employment hereunder, Employee will become acquainted and entrusted with Confidential Information which is the exclusive property of Employer. Employee further acknowledges that (i) Employer and the HRH Companies derive actual and potential economic value from the Confidential Information not being generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and (ii) Employer and the HRH Companies have expended and currently expend substantial effort to acquire Confidential Information, and expend substantial effort, and expect their employees to expend substantial effort, to maintain the secrecy of the Confidential Information. Employee agrees and covenants that Employee will safeguard the Confidential Information from exposure to, or appropriation by, unauthorized persons, either within or outside the employment of Employer or the HRH Companies, and that Employee will not, directly or indirectly, without the prior written consent of Employer during the term of this Agreement and any time in the three year period following termination of this Agreement, divulge or make any use of the Confidential Information except as may be required in the course of Employee’s employment hereunder. Employee also agrees that nothing in this agreement shall be construed to limit or otherwise restrict Employer’s right to protect its trade secrets so long as they remain a trade secret under applicable law. Upon termination of Employee’s employment, Employee covenants to deliver to Employer all information and materials, including personal notes and reproductions, relating to the Confidential Information, the HRH Companies, and the Customers, which are in Employee’s possession or control.

Page 3

5. NONPIRACY COVENANTS. For the purpose of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

“Customers” shall be limited to those customers of any of the HRH Companies for whom there is an insurance policy or bond in force or to or for whom any of the HRH Companies is rendering services as of the date of termination of Employee’s employment;

“Known Customers” shall be limited to those “Customers” included within Employee’s region as of the date of termination of employment, plus those Customers with whom Employee had personal contact, or for whom Employee handled insurance or bonds, or whose individualized risk management or employee benefit characteristics became known to Employee within the last year of Employee’s employment with Employer;

“Prohibited Services” shall mean those services in the fields of risk management, insurance or bonds performed by any of the HRH Companies within Employee’s region as of the date of termination of Employee’s employment. “Field of insurance” does not include title insurance, but does include all other lines of insurance sold by any of the HRH Companies within Employee’s region, including, without limitation, property and casualty, life, group, accident, health, disability, and annuities;

“Prospective Customers” shall be limited to those parties who are not currently Customers, but who are known by Employee to have been solicited to provide any Prohibited Service within the twelve (12) month period preceding the date of termination of Employee’s employment, by Employee or an employee within Employee’s region, and, with respect to any such potential Prospective Customer, Employee or an employee within Employee’s region had, within the twelve (12) month period preceding the date of termination of Employee’s employment, met for the purpose of offering any Prohibited Service or had received a written response to an earlier solicitation to provide a Prohibited Service;

“Restricted Period” shall mean the period of two (2) years immediately following the date of termination of Employee’s employment.

Employee recognizes that over a period of many years the Employer and the HRH Companies have developed, at considerable expense, relationships with, and knowledge about, Customers and Prospective Customers which constitute a major part of the value of Employer. During the course of Employee’s employment by Employer, Employee will have substantial contact with these Customers and Prospective Customers. In order to protect the value of the Employer’s business, Employee

Page 4

covenants and agrees that, in the event of the termination of Employee’s employment, whether voluntary or involuntary, whether with or without cause, Employee shall not, directly or indirectly, for Employee’s own account or for the account of any other person or entity, as an owner, stockholder, director, employee, partner, agent, broker, consultant or other participant during the Restricted Period:

(a) solicit a Known Customer or accept an invitation from a Known Customer for the purpose of providing Prohibited Services to such Known Customer; or

(b) solicit a Prospective Customer or accept an invitation from a Prospective Customer for the purpose of providing Prohibited Services to such Prospective Customer.

Subparagraphs (a) and (b) are separate and divisible covenants; if for any reason any one covenant is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining covenants shall remain valid and enforceable and shall not be affected thereby. Further, the periods and scope of the restrictions set forth in any such subparagraph shall be reduced by the minimum amount necessary to reform such subparagraph to the maximum level of enforcement permitted to Employer by the law governing this Agreement.

6. NONRAIDING OF EMPLOYEES. Employee covenants that during Employee’s employment hereunder and for twenty-four (24) months after termination of Employee’s employment, whether voluntary or involuntary, with or without cause, Employee will not hire any individuals who, as of the date of termination of Employee’s employment, were, or had been within the twelve (12) month period preceding Employee’s date of termination of employment, employees within Employee’s region or employees of any of the HRH Companies with whom he had contact within the twelve (12) month period preceding Employee’s termination (collectively, Known Group), nor will Employee directly or indirectly solicit, induce or encourage any member of the Known Group to seek employment with any other business, whether or not Employee is then affiliated with such business.

7. NOTIFICATION OF FORMER AND NEW EMPLOYMENT. During the term of this Agreement and the Restricted Period specified in paragraph 5 hereof, Employee covenants to notify any prospective employer or joint venturer, which is a competitor of Employer or any of the HRH Companies, of this Agreement with Employer; and if Employee accepts employment or establishes a relationship with such competitor during the above described period, Employee covenants to notify Employer and HRH immediately of such relationship. If Employer or HRH reasonably believes that Employee is affiliated or employed by or with a competitor of Employer or any of the HRH Companies during the Restricted Period, then Employee grants each of Employer and HRH the right to forward a copy of this Agreement to such competitor.

Page 5

8. ESSENCE OF AGREEMENT. The restrictive covenants from Employee for the benefit of the Employer and the HRH Companies set forth herein are the essence of this Agreement with respect to Employer agreeing to employ Employee and each such covenant shall be construed as independent of any other provision in this Agreement. The existence of any claim or cause of action of the Employee against the Employer, whether predicated on this Agreement or not, shall not constitute a defense to the enforcement by the Employer of any of the restrictive covenants contained herein. Employer shall at all times maintain the right to seek enforcement of these provisions whether or not Employer has previously refrained from seeking enforcement of any such provision as to Employee or any other individual who has signed an agreement with similar provisions. Further, Employee grants to Employer the continuous and unilateral right, upon written notice to Employee, to lessen the restrictions of any of the covenants set forth in paragraphs 4, 5, 6 and 7 hereof by so much as Employer deems necessary either to make this Agreement in accordance with public policy of the Commonwealth of Virginia or to fit the circumstances peculiar to Employee. Additionally, Employee covenants that if Employee has any questions about the scope or meaning of any restrictive covenants of this Agreement, then Employee shall put such questions in writing to General Counsel of HRH, who shall then endeavor to answer such requests as soon as practicable.

9. SEVERABILITY AND INDEPENDENCE. If any provision of this Agreement or any part of any provision of this Agreement is determined to be unenforceable for any reason whatsoever, it shall be severable from the rest of this Agreement and shall not invalidate or affect the other portions or parts of the Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect and be enforceable according to their terms. Furthermore, no covenant herein shall be dependent upon any other covenant or provision herein, each of which covenants shall stand independently and be enforceable without regard to the other or to any other provision of this Agreement.

10. INTERPRETATION. There shall be no presumption that this Agreement is to be construed against the Employer or the HRH Companies, since Employee acknowledges that Employee understands all provisions of this Agreement, that the restrictive covenants contained herein are ancillary to an enforceable agreement and are fair, necessary for the protection of Employer and the HRH Companies and relatively standard to the insurance agency industry and that Employee was offered the opportunity to negotiate, alter, and amend any and all provisions of this Agreement before executing this Agreement and legally binding himself hereto.

11. MANDATORY ARBITRATION; GOVERNING LAW; PRAYER FOR REFORMATION. Any dispute or controversy as to the interpretation, construction, application or enforcement of, or otherwise arising under or in connection with this Agreement, shall be submitted to mandatory, final and binding arbitration in the City of Richmond, Virginia, in accordance with the commercial arbitration rules then prevailing of the American Arbitration Association. Employer and Employee waive the right to

Page 6

submit any controversy or dispute to a Court and/or a jury. Any award rendered therein shall provide the full remedies available to the parties under the applicable law and shall be final and binding on each of the parties hereto and their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns and judgment may be entered thereon in any court having jurisdiction. The prevailing party in any such arbitration shall be entitled to an award by the arbitrator of all reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in connection with the arbitration. The parties agree that the transactions reflected in this document involve interstate commerce, and accordingly agree that any issues as to arbitrability shall be resolved pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act.

The parties agree that any substantive issues under this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY

EACH OF EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE KNOWINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY REQUESTS THAT ANY TRIBUNAL BEFORE WHOM THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT IS IN CONTROVERSY REFORM THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS HEREIN, IF SUCH REFORMATION IS NECESSARY TO MAKE ANY OF THEM ENFORCEABLE, TO THE MAXIMUM LEVEL OF ENFORCEMENT PERMISSIBLE TO EMPLOYER AND EQUITABLE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES. THIS PROVISION IS A MATERIAL INDUCEMENT FOR EMPLOYER TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT.

12. Mandatory Forum for Confirmation of Arbitration Award: Employee agrees that any award rendered as a result of the arbitration proceedings shall be confirmed in the Federal or State Courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and may be enforced by such courts as if the order were their own. By execution hereof, Employee irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of such courts for this purpose, and waives any defense that he is not subject to such proceedings, that the forum is not convenient, that the matter should be transferred to another forum, or that the arbitration award may not be confirmed and enforced by such courts. Employee consents to service of process in any such proceedings in any manner permitted by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

13. MISCELLANEOUS.

A. Case and Gender. Wherever required by the context of this Agreement, the singular and plural cases and the masculine, feminine and neuter genders shall be interchangeable.

Page 7

B. Nonwaiver. The waiver by HRH or Employer of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach or as a waiver of any other provisions of this Agreement.

C. Captions. The captions provided in this Agreement are intended for descriptive and reference purposes only and are not intended to limit the applicability of the terms of any paragraph to that caption.

D. Succession and Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and is not assignable by Employee. This Agreement shall inure, however, to the benefit of Employer’s successors and assigns, including, without limitation, successor corporations by way of merger or consolidation or any entity which purchases substantially all of the assets of Employer or of the region headed by Employee.

E. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior written or unwritten agreement, representation or understanding between the Employer and Employee and represents the entire agreement, representations and understanding between Employer and Employee concerning the subject matter hereof.

F. Executive Compensation and Benefits. Employee acknowledges that the executive compensation and benefits that may be offered are subject to change in the discretion of Employer and the Committee and the Board of Employer and are not guaranteed to continue or to be without change and may be terminated or altered as deemed prudent by any of the foregoing.

WITNESS the following signatures as of the date first set forth above.

EMPLOYER:

HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY

By

Its

EMPLOYEE:

Page 8

EX-10.12

Exhibit 10.12

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

CHANGE OF CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This First Amendment is made this              day of December, 2004, to that certain Change of Control Employment Agreement between HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY (“Company”) and [, dated July 1, 1998, and attached hereto as Exhibit A (“Old Agreement”).

Whereas, the Human Resources & Compensation Committee of the Company has requested a review of the Old Agreement’s provisions;

Whereas, the Old Agreement may be terminated by the Company at any time prior to its Effective Date (as therein defined);

Whereas, the Human Resources & Compensation Committee believes, based on the aforesaid review, the Old Agreement should be modified to ensure that a prospective purchaser of the Company be reasonably assured that any executives paid under the Old Agreement, as amended herein, be subject to reasonable restrictions commensurate to the Employment Period (as defined therein);

Therefore, it is agreed as follows:

1. Section 10(b) (and the language following Section 10(b)) and Section 12(a) shall be deleted from the Old Agreement.

2. The following language shall be substituted, or added, as the case may be:

10. Restrictive Covenants.

(b) Nonraiding of Employees. The Executive covenants during the Employment Period not to solicit, induce or encourage, for the purposes of employing or offering employment to, any individuals who, as of the date of termination of the Executive’s employment, are employees of the Company or its affiliates, nor will Executive directly or indirectly solicit, induce or encourage any of the Company’s or its affiliates’ employees to seek employment with any other business, whether or not the Executive is then affiliated with such business.

(c) Nonpiracy of Certain Accounts. During the Employment Period, except on behalf of Company, its affiliates and their

successors and assigns (“Protected Entity”), Executive shall not solicit, induce or encourage any person or entity doing business with the Company or its affiliates as of the Effective Date to cease or diminish its business with the Protected Entity.

In no event shall an asserted violation of the provisions of this Section 10 constitute a basis for deferring or withholding any amounts otherwise payable to the Executive under this Agreement. Subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) are separate and divisible covenants; if for any reason any one covenant is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining covenants shall remain valid and enforceable and shall not be affected thereby. Further, the periods and scope of the restrictions set forth in any such subparagraph shall be reduced by the minimum amount necessary to reform such subparagraph to the maximum level of enforcement permitted to Company or Protected Entity by the law governing this Agreement.

12. Miscellaneous.

(a) MANDATORY ARBITRATION; GOVERNING LAW; PRAYER FOR REFORMATION; MANDATORY FORUM FOR CONFIRMATION OF ARBITRATION AWARD; AMENDMENT. Any dispute or controversy as to the interpretation, construction, application or enforcement of, or otherwise arising under or in connection with this Agreement, shall be submitted to mandatory, final and binding arbitration in the City of Richmond, Virginia, in accordance with the commercial arbitration rules then prevailing of the American Arbitration Association. Executive and Company waive the right to submit any controversy or dispute to a Court and/or a jury. Any award rendered therein shall provide the full remedies available to the parties under the applicable law and shall be final and binding on each of the parties hereto and their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns and judgment may be entered thereon in any court having jurisdiction. Each party in any such arbitration shall bear its own costs in connection with the arbitration. The parties agree that the transactions reflected in this document involve interstate commerce, and accordingly agree that any issues as to arbitrability shall be resolved pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act.

The parties agree that any substantive issues under this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Executive agrees that any award rendered as a result of the arbitration proceedings shall be confirmed in the Federal or State Courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and may be enforced by such courts as if the order were their own. By execution hereof, Executive irrevocably

submits to the jurisdiction of such courts for this purpose, and waives any defense that Executive is not subject to such proceedings, that the forum is not convenient, that the matter should be transferred to another forum, or that the arbitration award may not be confirmed and enforced by such courts. Executive consents to service of process in any such proceedings in any manner permitted by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

This Agreement may not be amended or modified otherwise than by a written agreement executed by the parties hereto or their respective successors and legal representatives.

3. The Old Agreement, as modified herein by this First Amendment, shall continue in full force and effect.

	HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY
	By:
	Its:
Date	Date:

EX-10.24

Exhibit 10.24

February 22, 2005

John H. Doe

111 Somewhere Street

Richmond, VA 22222

Dear John:

You have been granted a nonqualified stock option to purchase 1,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, subject to the terms and conditions (i) in the Company’s 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), and (ii) as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof (together, with this letter, the “Agreement”), as follows:

Date of Agreement/Grant:	February 7, 2005
Exercise Price Per Share:	$33.06
Total Exercise Price:	$33,060.00
Expiration Date:	2/7/2012
Vesting Schedule:	25% per year for 4 years
	1,500 on 02/07/2006
	1,500 on 02/07/2007
	1,500 on 02/07/2008
	1,500 on 02/07/2009

Please indicate your acceptance by executing two (2) original copies of this Agreement and returning one (1) copy by U.S. Mail to Gwynn Noble.

Very truly yours,

Martin L. Vaughan, III

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge my Consent to Electronic Delivery, receipt of this Option, pursuant to all terms and conditions of the Plan, and electronic receipt of the Plan and Prospectus. I agree to conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Option and the Plan.

Signature:		Date:
	John H. Doe

Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please make the appropriate corrections on this form.

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS

FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

	GRANT DATE	OPTIONS GRANTED
Martin L. Vaughan, III	2/7/05	50,000
Robert B. Lockhart	2/7/05	24,000
Timothy J. Korman	2/7/05	18,000
John P. McGrath	2/7/05	14,500
Thomas Stiles	2/7/05	14,500

EX-10.25

Exhibit 10.25

February 22, 2005

John H. Doe

111 Somewhere Street

Richmond, VA 22222

Dear John:

I am pleased to announce that pursuant to the terms and conditions of the company’s 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the ‘Plan’), you have been granted Restricted Stock Award for 10,000 shares (the ‘Option’) of stock as outlined below.

Subject to the terms and conditions in the Plan, as amended from time to time and Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof (together with this letter, the “Agreement”), your award is as follows:

Grant Date:	February 7, 2005
Restricted Shares Granted:	1,000
Expiration Date:	2/7/2012
Vesting Schedule:	Executive Restricted	10% Earnings Growth Contingency
	2,500 on 02/07/2007	2006 vs. 2005 or 2005 vs. 2004
	2,500 on 02/07/2008	2007 vs. 2006 or 2006 vs. 2005
	2,500 on 02/07/2009	2008 vs. 2007 or 2007 vs. 2006
	2,500 on 02/07/2010	2009 vs. 2008 or 2008 vs. 2007

Please indicate your acceptance by executing two (2) original copies of this Agreement and returning one (1) copy by U.S. Mail to Gwynn Noble.

Very truly yours,

Martin L. Vaughan, III

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge my Consent to Electronic Delivery, receipt of this Option, pursuant to all terms and conditions of the Plan, and electronic receipt of the Plan and Prospectus. I agree to conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Option and the Plan.

Signature:		Date:
	John H. Doe

Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please make the appropriate corrections on this form.

RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS

FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

	AWARD DATE	SHARES AWARDED
Martin L. Vaughan, III	2/7/05	10,000
Robert B. Lockhart	2/7/05	6,000
Timothy J. Korman	2/7/05	4,500
John P. McGrath	2/7/05	3,500
Thomas Stiles	2/7/05	3,500

EX-13

Selected Financial Data

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and Subsidiaries                                                                   

	Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2004		2003		2002		2001		2000
Statement of Consolidated Income Data1:
Commissions and fees2	$	609,660	$	555,732	$	446,673	$	323,078	$	256,366
Investment income		3,176		3,151		2,439		2,585		2,626
Other		6,767		4,764		3,614		4,604		3,127
Total revenues		619,603		563,647		452,726		330,267		262,119
Compensation and employee benefits		332,060		302,497		245,405		182,397		146,442
Other operating expenses		112,879		97,358		80,308		62,095		50,165
Depreciation		8,693		9,082		7,771		6,116		5,357
Amortization of intangibles3		13,848		9,828		5,320		13,868		12,239
Interest expense		10,680		10,692		10,665		9,061		8,179
Integration costs		1,909		4,094		—		—		—
Loss on extinguishment of debt		1,557		—		—		—		—
Retirement benefit		—		5,195		—		—		—
Total expenses		481,626		438,746		349,469		273,537		222,382
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change		137,977		124,901		103,257		56,730		39,737
Income taxes		56,563		49,947		42,082		24,381		17,610
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change		81,414		74,954		61,175		32,349		22,127
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax2,4		—		—		3,944		—		(325	)
Net Income3	$	81,414	$	74,954	$	65,119	$	32,349	$	21,802
Net Income Per Share — Basic:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	2.27	$	2.17	$	2.09	$	1.18	$	0.84
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax2,4		—		—		0.14		—		(0.01	)
Net Income	$	2.27	$	2.17	$	2.23	$	1.18	$	0.83
Net Income Per Share — Assuming Dilution:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	2.23	$	2.06	$	1.89	$	1.07	$	0.78
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax3,4		—		—		0.12		—		(0.01	)
Net Income	$	2.23	$	2.06	$	2.01	$	1.07	$	0.77
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic		35,833		34,595		29,240		27,411		26,224
Assuming Dilution		36,493		36,304		32,876		31,160		29,784
Dividends paid per share	$	0.4075	$	0.3675	$	0.3575	$	0.3475	$	0.3375
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Intangible assets, net	$	757,942	$	614,246	$	441,973	$	266,083	$	196,658
Total assets		1,277,999		1,049,227		833,024		494,076		353,371
Long term debt, less current portion		265,384		174,012		177,151		114,443		103,114
Other long term liabilities including deferred income taxes		66,006		42,281		21,180		11,786		11,034
Total shareholders’ equity		507,156		434,267		310,648		142,802		88,222

¹ See Note K of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding business purchase transactions which impact the comparability of this information. In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, the company consummated 10 and 11 purchase acquisitions, respectively.

² Effective January 1, 2002, the company changed its method of accounting for commissions on premiums billed and collected directly by insurance carriers on its middle-market property and casualty business. See Note B of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information.

³ Adoption of FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” required the company to cease goodwill amortization as of January 1, 2002. For the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, goodwill amortization, net of income taxes, was $8.4 million and $6.7 million, respectively.

⁴ Adoption of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 101, effective January 1, 2000, required the company to establish a reserve for policy cancellations.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial

Condition and Results of Operations

The income of an insurance and risk management intermediary such as the company is principally derived from commissions earned, which are generally percentages of premiums placed with insurance underwriters. Premium pricing within the insurance underwriting industry has been cyclical and has displayed a high degree of volatility based on prevailing economic and competitive conditions. Increases and decreases in premium rates result directly in revenue changes to the company. From 1987 until 1999, the property and casualty insurance industry had been in a “soft market;” however, beginning in 2000, the industry experienced a firming of commercial premium rates which continued through 2002. In 2003, the industry observed more moderate increases in commercial premium rates, while beginning in the second quarter of 2004, the industry began to observe another “softening” in property and casualty premium rates. In addition, the level of contingent commissions received by the company, which is based upon the application of certain factors, including profitability, premium growth, total premium volume or some combination of these factors, is subject to annual fluctuations and cannot be reasonably predicted. The company’s 2004 revenues have increased primarily due to acquisitions and net new business. Management cannot predict the timing or extent of contingent commissions or premium pricing changes due to market conditions or their effects on the company’s results of operations in the future.

results of operations

For 2004, net income was $81.4 million, or $2.23 per share, compared to $75.0 million, or $2.06 per share, last year. Net income for 2004 included a loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax, of $0.9 million, or $0.03 per share, and integration costs, net of tax, of $1.1 million, or $0.03 per share. For 2003, net income included a one-time retirement benefit charge, net of tax, of $3.2 million, or $0.09 per share, and integration costs, net of tax, of $2.5 million, or $0.07 per share. In addition, non-operating (losses) gains, net of tax, were ($0.3) million, or ($0.01) per share, and $0.2 million, or $0.01 per share, for 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The loss on extinguishment of debt was associated with the company’s executing the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Amended Credit Agreement) in December 2004. This charge represented financing costs previously deferred in connection with the financing of the company’s former credit agreement in addition to certain lending fees paid in obtaining the Amended Credit Agreement. Integration costs in 2004 and 2003 represented costs associated with the company’s integration of Hobbs Group, LLC (Hobbs), which began after the completion of the Hobbs June 30, 2003 earn-out. These costs included severance, other employee-related costs, facility costs and branding expenses. The company expects to continue to incur certain facility relocation and lease termination costs in 2005 as a result of its continued integration of Hobbs. The 2003 retirement benefit charge represented a contractual retirement benefit for Andrew L. Rogal, the company’s former chairman and chief executive officer, who retired in May 2003. This charge consisted primarily of compensation and the accelerated vesting of stock options and non-vested stock.

For 2003, net income was $75.0 million, or $2.06 per share, compared to $65.1 million, or $2.01 per share, for 2002. Net income for 2003 included a one-time retirement benefit charge, net of tax, of $3.2 million, or $0.09 per share, and integration costs, net of tax, of $2.5 million, or $0.07 per share. For 2002, net income reflected a one-time addition, net of tax, of $3.9 million, or $0.12 per share, for a cumulative effect of an accounting change relating to revenue recognition. In addition, non-operating gains, net of tax, were $0.2 million and $0.1 million for 2003 and 2002, respectively. Diluted weighted average shares for 2003 increased 10.4% from the prior year due to acquisition- related share issuances and a public offering in November 2002, partially offset by share repurchases.

Commissions and fees for 2004 were $609.7 million, an increase of 9.7% from commissions and fees of $555.7 million during the prior year. Approximately $50.3 million of commissions and fees were derived from new insurance agencies

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

(continued)

and accounts purchased in 2004 and 2003. This increase was offset by decreases of approximately $6.4 million from the sale of certain agencies and accounts in 2004 and 2003. Commissions and fees, excluding the effect of acquisitions and dispositions, increased 1.8%. This increase principally reflects net new business production, partially offset by the effects of a continued softening of property and casualty premium rates and the elimination of under-performing producers, resulting in the loss of some business. See “Recent Industry Developments” for additional discussion of the company’s contingent and override commission arrangements.

Commissions and fees for 2003 were $555.7 million, an increase of 24.4% from commissions and fees of $446.7 million during the prior year. Approximately $87.2 million of commissions and fees were derived from new insurance agencies and accounts purchased in 2003 and 2002. This increase was offset by decreases of approximately $2.5 million from the sale of certain accounts in 2003 and 2002. Commissions and fees, excluding the effect of acquisitions and dispositions, increased 5.5%. This increase principally reflects net new business production and moderate premium rate increases. In addition, commissions and fees were impacted by a Hobbs post earn-out productivity lull and legislative uncertainty affecting executive benefit products. Both matters were largely resolved by the end of 2003.

Total operating expenses for 2004 were $481.6 million, an increase of $42.9 million, or 9.8%, from 2003. For 2003, total operating expenses were $438.7 million, an increase of $89.3 million, or 25.5%, from 2002.

Compensation and employee benefits costs for 2004 were $332.1 million, an increase of $29.6 million, or 9.8%, from 2003. Increases include approximately $28.9 million related to 2004 and 2003 purchase acquisitions, partially offset by decreases of $3.2 million related to agencies and accounts sold. Additional compensation expenditures in 2004 can be further attributed to investments in new talent as the company continues to implement its new team-based sales model and invest in its major accounts sales and service capabilities. The increased costs from acquired agencies and investments in new talent were partially offset by reductions for performance-based compensation and the elimination of underperforming sales personnel. Compensation and employee benefits costs for 2003 were $302.5 million, an increase of $57.1 million, or 23.3%, from 2002. Increases include approximately $48.0 million related to 2003 and 2002 purchase acquisitions and increases in revenue production, partially offset by decreases of $1.3 million related to accounts sold.

Other operating expenses for 2004 were $112.9 million, or 15.9% higher than 2003. Increases relate primarily to purchase acquisitions in 2004 and 2003 and increased legal, compliance and claims expenditures. The $6.5 million increase in legal, compliance and claims expenditures can be attributed to the protection of restrictive covenants in employment contracts, an unusual claims matter, compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and various regulatory inquiries and other proceedings in the wake of a civil lawsuit against Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. filed by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York. As part of its response to regulatory inquiries and other proceedings related to industry business practices and compensation arrangements, the company expects to continue to incur additional legal and compliance costs through at least the first two quarters of 2005.

Depreciation expense for 2004 decreased $0.4 million, or 4.3%, from 2003 to $8.7 million. Depreciation expense decreased due to the impact of fully depreciated assets and disposed assets, partially offset by higher amounts related to purchase acquisitions in 2004 and 2003.

Other operating expenses and depreciation expense for 2003 were $97.4 million and $9.1 million, respectively, or 21.2% and 16.9%, respectively, higher than 2002. Increases relate primarily to purchase acquisitions in 2003 and 2002, higher insurance costs and costs associated with revenue growth.

Amortization expense reflects the amortization of intangible assets acquired in the purchase of insurance agencies. Amortization expense increased $4.0 million, or 40.9%, in 2004, which is attributable to acquisitions consummated during 2004 and 2003. Amortization expense increased by $4.5 million, or 84.7%, in 2003, which is attributable to acquisitions consummated during 2003 and 2002.

Interest expense has remained consistent at $10.7 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002. Interest expense in 2004 was impacted by lower borrowing rates, offset by increased borrowings for acquisitions in the second half of the year. For 2003 interest expense, the impact of additional average borrowings for acquisitions was offset by the conversion of the company’s convertible debt in November 2002.

The effective tax rate for the company was 41.0%, 40.0% and 40.8% in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The 2004 rate increased primarily due to permanent tax differences related to the company’s current year non-operating gains. The 2003 rate decreased primarily due to state tax planning.

Over the last three years, inflationary pressure has been relatively modest and did not have a significant effect on the company’s operations, while contingent commissions received by the company have historically been heavily weighted in the first and second quarters.

liquidity and capital resources

Net cash provided by operations totaled $114.8 million, $110.4 million and $73.4 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and is primarily dependent upon the timing of the collection of insurance premiums from clients and payment of those premiums to the appropriate insurance underwriters.

The company has historically generated sufficient funds internally to finance capital expenditures. Cash expenditures for the acquisition of property and equipment were $8.8 million, $11.8 million and $6.6 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Cash outlays related to the purchase of insurance agencies amounted to $65.8 million, $46.0 million and $107.0 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Cash outlays for such insurance agency acquisitions have been funded through operations and long-term borrowings. In addition, a portion of the purchase price of such acquisitions may be paid through common stock and/or deferred cash and common stock payments; see “Note K — Acquisitions” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion. Cash proceeds from the sales of certain offices, insurance accounts and other assets totaled $11.8 million, $1.3 million and $2.7 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The company did not have any material capital expenditure commitments as of December 31, 2004.

Financing activities provided (utilized) cash of $32.4 million, ($62.8) million and $118.1 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, as the company borrowed funds to finance acquisitions, made debt payments and annually increased its dividend rate. In addition, in 2004, the company signed the Amended Credit Agreement, providing for additional term loan borrowings, and in 2002, the company raised additional equity capital. During 2004, the company repurchased, on the open market, 936,100 shares of its common stock for $31.5 million under its stock repurchase program. The company repurchased, on the open market, 1,132,800 shares of its common stock for $33.5 million

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

(continued)

under its stock repurchase program in 2003. The company is currently authorized for 2005 and later years to purchase up to $50.0 million annually of its common stock subject to market conditions and other factors.

On December 15, 2004, the company signed the Amended Credit Agreement which provided for a revolving credit facility of $175.0 million, a Tranche A term loan of $50.0 million, and a Tranche B term loan of $200.0 million. The Amended Credit Agreement further permits the company to request additional term borrowings of up to $75.0 million prior to December 31, 2006, and provides that a portion of the revolving credit facility will be available for the issuance of letters of credit. At December 31, 2004, the company had borrowings of $250.0 million under the term loan facilities and had $174.7 million available for future borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The term loan facilities are payable quarterly beginning March 31, 2005, and the revolving credit facility is due and payable upon the maturity date. Both the Tranche A term loan and revolving credit facility mature on December 15, 2009, and the Tranche B term loan matures on December 15, 2011. Increased borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement were made available for acquisitions, repurchase of equity shares and general corporate purposes.

The Amended Credit Agreement contains, among other provisions, requirements for maintaining certain financial ratios and specific limits or restrictions on acquisitions, indebtedness, payment of dividends and repurchases of common stock. Management does not believe that the restrictions contained in the Amended Credit Agreement will, in the foreseeable future, adversely affect the company’s ability to pay cash dividends at the current dividend rate.

The company had a current ratio (current assets to current liabilities) of 1.08 to 1.00 as of December 31, 2004. Shareholders’ equity of $507.2 million at December 31, 2004 increased from $434.3 million at December 31, 2003. The debt to equity ratio of 0.52 to 1.00 at December 31, 2004 increased from the prior year-end ratio of 0.40 to 1.00 due to higher borrowings from the execution of its Amended Credit Agreement and the financing of current year acquisitions in addition to 2004 dividend payments and common stock repurchases, partially offset by net income and issuances of common stock, including the income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options.

The company believes that cash generated from operations, together with proceeds from borrowings, will provide sufficient funds to meet the company’s short- and long-term funding needs.

contractual obligations

The company has the following future payments related to contractual obligations as of December 31, 2004:

			Payments due by Period
Contractual Obligations (in millions)	Total		Less than 1 year		1 – 2 years		2 – 3 years		3 – 4 years		After 4 years
Long-term debt	$	281.6	$	16.2	$	10.0	$	5.2	$	0.2	$	250.0
Operating leases		128.9		26.6		22.7		20.5		16.9		42.2
Other long-term liabilities		22.8		1.9		2.2		3.3		5.1		10.3
Total obligations	$	433.3	$	44.7	$	34.9	$	29.0	$	22.2	$	302.5

market risk

The company has variable rate debt, maintains certain investments and utilizes derivative financial instruments (on a limited basis) which are subject to market risk; however, the company believes that exposure to market risk associated with these instruments is not material.

recent industry developments

On October 14, 2004, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York (NYAG) filed a lawsuit against Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and its subsidiary Marsh Inc. (collectively Marsh), the world’s largest insurance broker, alleging statutory and common law fraud, securities fraud, bid-rigging and other antitrust violations in the placement of insurance business. On March 4, 2005, the NYAG filed a lawsuit against Aon Corporation (Aon), the world’s second largest insurance broker, alleging fraudulent business practices, common law fraud and securities fraud in connection with the conduct of its placement of insurance business. Marsh and Aon have each announced settlement agreements with the NYAG and certain state regulators. Under the terms of the agreements, Marsh and Aon are required to establish settlement funds in the amount of $850 million and $190 million, respectively, to compensate U.S. policyholder clients who retained Marsh and Aon to place insurance with inception or renewal dates between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2004, where such policies resulted in Marsh and Aon recording contingent or override commissions.

The Marsh and Aon settlement agreements also place restrictions on the future business practices of these companies. Marsh and Aon may no longer accept (i) any contingent compensation for services in placing, renewing, consulting on or servicing any insurance policy and (ii) any compensation other than a specific fee to be paid by the client, a specific percentage commission on premiums to be paid by the insurer set at the time of the purchase, renewal, placement or servicing of the policy, or both types of compensation. If Marsh or Aon receives any commission, it must disclose to the client that it intends to collect the commission and obtain the client’s written consent prior to the binding of the policy.

As of the date of this report, the company has not received a subpoena from the NYAG. However, as a result of the NYAG’s lawsuits against Marsh and Aon, controversy now surrounds the longstanding insurance industry practice of contingent and override commissions paid to agents and brokers by underwriters. A committee of the company’s board of directors was previously authorized to perform an independent review concerning the company’s practices in the areas that are the subjects of the NYAG’s allegations against Marsh. This committee has engaged outside legal counsel to assist it in the review.

In addition to the ongoing investigation by the NYAG, other state attorneys general and insurance departments have been making inquiries into, among other things, the industry’s commission payment practices. In October 2004, the company received a subpoena from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Connecticut (CTAG), as part of the CTAG’s investigation of possible antitrust violations. The CTAG’s subpoena requests information concerning various business practices, including contingent commissions. The company also has received subpoenas from the attorneys general in Florida, Massachusetts and North Carolina requesting information regarding business practices. In addition, the company has received requests for information from state insurance departments in ten states, and the company may receive additional subpoenas and/or requests for information in the future from attorneys general and/or insurance departments of other states. It is the company’s understanding that numerous others in the insurance industry have also received such subpoenas and requests for information. The company will evaluate, and intends to cooperate fully in connection with, all such subpoenas and requests.

The company has historically entered into contingent and override commission agreements with various underwriters. Contingent commissions are commissions paid by underwriters based on profitability of the business, premium growth, total premium volume or some combination of these factors. Revenue from contingent commissions is heavily weighted in the first and second quarters. Override commissions are typically volume-based commissions paid by underwriters in excess of the standard commission rates on specific classes of business.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

(continued)

For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the company recognized $42.4 million and $40.8 million, respectively, in contingent and override commissions. Of the 2004 amount, approximately 81% was from standard contingency agreements maintained at the local office level, and approximately 19% was from specially negotiated volume-based national override agreements, which are also in keeping with industry norms. Effective for business written on or after January 1, 2005, these national override agreements, which were paid quarterly when earned, reverted into standard local contingency arrangements with those underwriters, which will be paid and recorded annually beginning in early 2006. There can be no assurance that the loss of override commissions resulting from the reversion to standard local contingency arrangements will be offset by additional contingent commissions in future periods.

The company intends to monitor broker compensation practices and, as warranted by market and regulatory developments, will review its compensation arrangements with underwriters. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of the governmental inquiries into the insurance industry’s commission payment practices or the market’s response thereto, any material decrease in the company’s contingent commissions is likely to have a negative effect on its results of operations.

In addition to state regulatory inquiries, the company has been named as a defendant in three purported class action suits brought against a number of brokers in the insurance industry. For information on industry litigation, see “Note O — Commitments and Contingencies” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

critical accounting policies

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require the company to make estimates and assumptions. The company believes that of its significant accounting policies (see “Note A — Significant Accounting Policies” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

Revenue Recognition

The company is engaged in insurance agency and brokerage activities and derives revenues primarily from commissions on the sale of insurance products to clients that are paid by the insurance underwriters with whom its subsidiary agencies place their clients’ insurance. Generally, commission income (and fees in lieu of commission), as well as the related premiums receivable from clients and premiums payable to insurance companies, is recognized as of the effective date of insurance coverage or billing date, whichever is later, net of an allowance for estimated policy cancellations. Commissions on premiums billed and collected directly by insurance companies on its middle-market and major accounts property and casualty business are recorded as revenue on the later of the billing date or the effective date. Commissions on premiums billed and collected directly by insurance companies on other property and casualty and employee benefits business are recorded as revenue when received. Contingent commissions and miscellaneous commissions are recorded as revenue when received. Service fees are recognized over the period which the services are rendered. Override commissions are recorded as earned.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its clients to make required payments. The company monitors its allowance utilizing accounts receivable aging data as the basis to support the estimate. If the financial condition of the company’s clients were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, an additional allowance may be required. In addition, the company has the ability to cancel coverage for clients who have not made required payments.

Intangible Assets

The company has acquired significant intangible assets in business acquisitions. The valuation of intangible assets is subject to significant assumptions including projected future operating results. The determination of estimated useful lives and whether the assets are impaired requires significant judgment and affects the amount of future amortization and possible impairment charges. The company tests goodwill for impairment in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” In addition, intangible assets subject to amortization are periodically reviewed to determine that no conditions exist indicating a possible impairment.

Income Taxes

The company records an income tax provision for the expected tax consequences of its reported results. The company’s provision includes deferred income taxes to reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The company evaluates its ability to realize the deferred tax assets in the future and records a valuation allowance when necessary. The determination of income taxes and assessment of realization of deferred tax assets requires significant judgment due to the complexity of tax laws and the company’s operation in multiple states.

new accounting standards

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (Statement 123R). Statement 123R revises Statement 123. The revised standard requires all companies to recognize compensation costs related to all share-based payments (including stock options) in their financial statements at fair value, thereby, upon adoption, eliminating the use of pro forma disclosures to report such amounts. Statement 123R is effective for all public companies at the beginning of the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2005.

Statement 123R permits public companies to account for the adoption of this revised standard using one of two methods: the modified-prospective method or the modified-retrospective method. The modified-prospective method requires the company to recognize compensation based upon fair value for only those share-based awards granted with an effective date subsequent to the company’s date of adoption and share-based awards issued in prior periods that remain unvested at the date of adoption. The modified-retrospective method allows companies to restate, based upon pro forma amounts previously disclosed under the requirements of Statement 123, for either all prior periods presented or prior interim periods included in the year of adoption.

The company intends to adopt Statement 123R no later than July 1, 2005, but has yet to determine which of the two methods described above will be utilized. The company continues to evaluate the impact of this proposed statement on its financial position and results of operations.

changes in accounting methods

Effective January 1, 2002, the company changed its method of accounting for commissions on premiums billed and collected directly by insurance companies on its middle-market property and casualty business. Prior to 2002, this revenue was recognized when received. Beginning January 1, 2002, this revenue is recorded on the later of the

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

(continued)

billing date or the effective date, consistent with the revenue recognition policy for agency billed business. This is the predominant practice followed in the industry. Management believes that this methodology is preferable and that it better matches the income with the related expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the effect of this change was to increase net income by $5.1 million ($0.15 per share), which included the cumulative effect adjustment of $3.9 million ($0.12 per share), net of income taxes of $2.6 million.

forward-looking statements

When used in the company’s annual report, in Form 10-K or other filings by the company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in the company’s press releases or other public or shareholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized company executive officer, the words or phrases “would be,” “will allow,” “expects to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

While forward-looking statements are provided to assist in the understanding of the company’s anticipated future financial performance, the company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the company’s control. Although the company believes that the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove to be inaccurate. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by such forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons. Risk factors and uncertainties that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the following: the company’s commission revenues are highly dependent on premium rates charged by insurance underwriters, which are subject to fluctuation based on the prevailing economic conditions and competitive factors that affect insurance underwriters; the level of contingent commissions is difficult to predict and any decrease in the company’s collection of them is likely to have an impact on operating results; the company has eliminated override commissions effective for business written on or after January 1, 2005, and it is uncertain whether additional contingent commissions payable to the company will offset the loss of such revenues; the company’s continued growth has been enhanced through acquisitions, which may or may not be available on acceptable terms in the future and which, if consummated, may or may not be advantageous to the company; the company’s failure to integrate an acquired insurance agency efficiently may have an adverse effect on the company; the general level of economic activity can have a substantial impact on revenues that is difficult to predict; a strong economic period may not necessarily result in higher revenues if the volume of insurance business brought about by favorable economic conditions is offset by premium rates that have declined in response to increased competitive conditions; if the company is unable to respond in a timely and cost-effective manner to rapid technological change in the insurance intermediary industry, there may be a resulting adverse effect on business and operating results; the business practices and broker compensation arrangements of the company and the insurance intermediary industry are subject to uncertainty due to investigations by various governmental authorities and related private litigation; and quarterly and annual variations in the company’s commissions and fees that result from the timing of policy renewals and the net effect of new and lost business production may have unexpected impacts on the company’s results of operations.

The company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Consolidated Balance Sheet

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and Subsidiaries

	December 31,
(in thousands)	2004			2003
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents, including $55,909 and $58,233, respectively, of restricted funds	$	210,470		$	126,464
Receivables:
Premiums and commissions, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,630 and $4,243, respectively		211,299			223,431
Other		29,122			31,820
		240,421			255,251
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		24,586			14,603
Total Current Assets		475,477			396,318
Property and Equipment, net		24,024			25,487
Intangible Assets
Goodwill		608,427			522,247
Other intangible assets, net		149,515			91,999
		757,942			614,246
Other Assets		20,556			13,176
	$	1,277,999		$	1,049,227
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities
Premiums payable to insurance companies	$	315,130		$	308,533
Accounts payable		13,417			9,089
Accrued expenses		46,371			37,434
Premium deposits and credits due customers		48,287			34,290
Current portion of long-term debt		16,248			9,321
Total Current Liabilities		439,453			398,667
Long-Term Debt		265,384			174,012
Deferred Income Taxes		34,113			19,208
Other Long-Term Liabilities		31,893			23,073
Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock, no par value; authorized 100,000 shares; outstanding 35,886 and 35,446 shares, respectively		233,785			228,357
Retained earnings		271,978			205,184
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of deferred tax benefit of $120 and $334, respectively		(181	)		(502	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		1,574			1,228
		507,156			434,267
	$	1,277,999		$	1,049,227

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Statement of Consolidated Income

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and Subsidiaries

	Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2004		2003		2002
Revenues
Commissions and fees	$	609,660	$	555,732	$	446,673
Investment income		3,176		3,151		2,439
Other		6,767		4,764		3,614
		619,603		563,647		452,726
Operating expenses
Compensation and employee benefits		332,060		302,497		245,405
Other operating expenses		112,879		97,358		80,308
Depreciation		8,693		9,082		7,771
Amortization of intangibles		13,848		9,828		5,320
Interest expense		10,680		10,692		10,665
Integration costs		1,909		4,094		—
Loss on extinguishment of debt		1,557		—		—
Retirement benefit		—		5,195		—
		481,626		438,746		349,469
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change		137,977		124,901		103,257
Income taxes		56,563		49,947		42,082
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change		81,414		74,954		61,175
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—		—		3,944
Net Income	$	81,414	$	74,954	$	65,119
Net Income Per Share — Basic:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	2.27	$	2.17	$	2.09
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—		—		0.14
Net income	$	2.27	$	2.17	$	2.23
Net Income Per Share — Assuming Dilution:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	2.23	$	2.06	$	1.89
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—		—		0.12
Net income	$	2.23	$	2.06	$	2.01

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Statement of Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and Subsidiaries

(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Common Stock			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at January 1, 2002	$	55,542		$	88,604		$	(1,344	)
Issuance of 5,174 shares of common stock		108,089
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options		4,927
Payment of dividends ($0.3575 per share)					(10,718	)
Unrealized loss on derivative contracts, net of deferred tax benefit of $22								(33	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments								462
Net income					65,119
Balance at December 31, 2002		168,558			143,005			(915	)
Issuance of 3,095 shares of common stock		87,609
Repurchase of 1,133 shares of common stock		(33,516	)
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options		4,800
Payment of dividends ($0.3675 per share)					(12,775	)
Unrealized gain on derivative contracts, net of deferred tax expense of $643								963
Retirement benefit		906
Foreign currency translation adjustments								678
Net income					74,954
Balance at December 31, 2003		228,357			205,184			726
Issuance of 1,376 shares of common stock		29,936
Repurchase of 936 shares of common stock		(31,474	)
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options		6,966
Payment of dividends ($0.4075 per share)					(14,620	)
Unrealized gain on derivative contracts, net of deferred tax expense of $214								321
Foreign currency translation adjustments								346
Net income					81,414
Balance at December 31, 2004	$	233,785		$	271,978		$	1,393

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and Subsidiaries

	Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)	2004			2003			2002
Operating Activities
Net income	$	81,414		$	74,954		$	65,119
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Integration costs		1,909			4,094			—
Retirement benefit		—			5,195			—
Depreciation		8,693			9,082			7,771
Amortization of intangibles		13,848			9,828			5,320
Loss on extinguishment of debt		1,557			—			—
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—			—			(3,944	)
Provision for losses on receivables		1,588			1,362			1,745
Provision for deferred income taxes		685			3,462			3,742
Gain on sale of assets		(2,076	)		(385	)		(212	)
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options		6,966			4,800			4,927
Changes in operating assets and liabilities net of effects from integration costs, retirement benefit and insurance agency acquisitions and dispositions:
(Increase) decrease in receivables		29,001			(16,352	)		(15,893	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses		(5,880	)		8,954			(11,617	)
Increase (decrease) in premiums payable to insurance companies		(30,908	)		13,738			1,462
Increase in premium deposits and credits due customers		13,997			2,214			13,265
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		561			(4,188	)		(349	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses		(4,422	)		(11,637	)		5,788
Other operating activities		(2,137	)		5,233			(3,752	)
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		114,796			110,354			73,372
Investing Activities
Purchase of property and equipment		(8,760	)		(11,827	)		(6,641	)
Purchase of insurance agencies, net of cash acquired		(65,798	)		(46,041	)		(107,011	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		11,800			1,311			2,683
Other investing activities		(471	)		771			2,647
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(63,229	)		(55,786	)		(108,322	)
Financing Activities
Proceeds from long-term debt		320,000			30,000			160,000
Principal payments on long-term debt		(239,921	)		(45,908	)		(71,506	)
Debt issuance costs		(1,923	)		(557	)		(2,356	)
Repurchase of common stock		(31,474	)		(33,516	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of tax payments for options exercised		377			(40	)		42,642
Dividends		(14,620	)		(12,775	)		(10,718	)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities		32,439			(62,796	)		118,062
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		84,006			(8,228	)		83,112
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		126,464			134,692			51,580
Cash and cash equivalents at End of Year	$	210,470		$	126,464		$	134,692

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and Subsidiaries

December 31, 2004

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, a Virginia corporation, operates offices located in 29 states and in London, England. Its principal activity is the performance of insurance and risk management intermediary services which involves placing various types of insurance, including property and casualty, employee benefits and many other areas of specialized exposure, with insurance underwriters on behalf of its clients.

note a

significant accounting policies

Principles of Consolidation — The accompanying financial statements include the accounts of the company and its subsidiaries. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts for the prior years have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenues — Commission income (and fees in lieu of commission) as well as the related premiums receivable from clients and premiums payable to insurance companies are recorded as of the effective date of insurance coverage or the billing date, whichever is later. Commissions on premiums billed and collected directly by insurance companies on middle-market and major accounts property and casualty business are recorded as revenue on the later of the billing date or effective date. Commissions on premiums billed and collected directly by insurance companies on other property and casualty and employee benefits business are recorded as revenue when received which, in many cases, is the company’s first notification of amounts earned due to the lack of policy and renewal information. Contingent commissions are recorded as revenue when received. Contingent commissions are commissions paid by insurance underwriters and are based on the estimated profit and/or overall volume of business placed with the underwriter. The data necessary for the calculation of contingent commissions cannot be reasonably obtained prior to receipt of the commission which, in many cases, is the company’s first notification of amounts earned.

The company carries a reserve for policy cancellations which is periodically evaluated and adjusted as necessary. Miscellaneous premium adjustments are recorded as they occur. The policy cancellation reserve as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $2.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively. For 2004, the $0.9 million net increase in the cancellation reserve was primarily comprised of new reserves related to changes in observed policy cancellation trends and acquisitions.

Service fee revenue is recorded on a pro rata basis as the services are provided. Service fee revenue typically relates to claims management and loss control services, program administration and workers compensation consultative services which are provided over a period of time, typically one year. Override commissions are commissions paid by insurance underwriters in excess of the standard commission rates on specific classes of business. These amounts are paid as a percentage of premiums on certain classes of business written with the specific underwriter and are recorded as earned.

Investment income is recorded as earned. The company’s investment policy provides for the investment of premiums between the time they are collected from the client and remitted (net of commission) to the underwriter. Typically, premiums are due to the underwriters 45 days after the end of the month in which the policy renews. This investment activity is part of normal operations and, accordingly, investment income earned is reported in revenues.

Cash Equivalents — The company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts reported on the balance sheet approximate the fair values.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts — The company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its clients to make required payments. The company monitors its allowance utilizing accounts receivable aging data as the basis to support the estimate.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(continued)

Property and Equipment — Property and equipment are stated on the basis of cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives (generally 30 years for buildings and 3 to 7 years for furniture and equipment). Leasehold improvements are generally amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the term of the related lease or the estimated useful life of the corresponding asset.

Intangible Assets — The company accounts for intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statements No. 141, “Business Combinations”, and No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (Statement 142). Goodwill is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their useful lives and are periodically reviewed to ensure that no conditions exist indicating that the recorded amount of intangible assets is not recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the company had three stock-based compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note H. The company continues to account for its stock options using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (APB No. 25), and related interpretations. No stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income for options except as disclosed in Note N, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (Statement 123), as amended by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure,” establishes accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value based method of accounting for stock options.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement 123 to stock-based compensation.

(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2004			2003			2002
Net Income — as reported	$	81,414		$	74,954		$	65,119
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(5,388	)		(6,817	)		(4,714	)
Pro forma net income	$	76,026		$	68,137		$	60,405
Net Income Per Share:
Basic — as reported	$	2.27		$	2.17		$	2.23
Basic — pro forma	$	2.12		$	1.97		$	2.07
Assuming Dilution — as reported	$	2.23		$	2.06		$	2.01
Assuming Dilution — pro forma	$	2.08		$	1.88		$	1.87

The fair value of these options was estimated at the grant date using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively: risk free rates of 3.62%, 3.50% and 4.64%; dividend yields of 1.14%, 0.99% and 0.86%; volatility factors of 0.292, 0.267 and 0.252; and an expected life of approximately seven years. The weighted average fair value per option granted in 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $10.79, $11.40 and $13.89, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, receivables, premiums payable to insurance companies, accounts payable, accrued expenses, premium deposits and credits due customers and long-term debt approximate those assets’ and liabilities’ fair values. Fair values for interest rate swaps are based on third-party pricing models or formulas using current assumptions and are disclosed in Note D.

Derivatives — The company accounts for derivative and hedging instruments in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (Statement 133) as amended by Statement No. 138. Statement 133 requires the company to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value. Gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value must be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge criteria are met. If a derivative is a hedge, depending upon the nature of the hedge, a change in its fair value is either offset against the change in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Any difference between fair value of the hedge and the item being hedged, known as the ineffective portion, is immediately recognized in earnings.

The company’s use of derivative instruments is limited to interest rate swap agreements used to modify the interest characteristics for a portion of its outstanding variable rate debt. These interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges and are structured so that there is no ineffectiveness.

The change in value of the interest rate swaps is reported as a component of the company’s OCI and reclassified into interest expense in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Derivative instruments are carried at fair value on the balance sheet in the applicable line item other assets or other long-term liabilities.

Termination of an interest rate swap agreement would result in the amount previously recorded in OCI being reclassified to interest expense related to the debt over the remaining term of the original contract life of the terminated swap agreement. In the event of the early extinguishment of a debt obligation, any amounts in OCI relating to designated hedge transactions of the extinguished debt would be reclassified to earnings coincident with the extinguishment.

Income Taxes — The company (except for its foreign subsidiaries) files a consolidated federal income tax return with its subsidiaries. Deferred taxes result from temporary differences between the income tax and financial statement bases of assets and liabilities and are based on tax laws as currently enacted.

Foreign Currency Translation — The accounts of the company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using local currency as the functional currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates, and income and expense are translated at average monthly exchange rates. Net exchange gains or losses resulting from such translations are excluded from net earnings and accumulated as a separate component of OCI. The company does not provide income taxes on such gains and losses.

Accrued Expenses — Accrued expenses included compensation and employee benefits of $31.3 million and $28.7 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Accounting Pronouncements — In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (Statement 123R). Statement 123R revises Statement 123. The revised standard requires all companies to recognize compensation costs related to all share-based payments (including stock options) in their financial statements at fair value, thereby, upon adoption, eliminating the use of pro forma disclosures to report such amounts. Statement 123R is effective for all public companies at the beginning of the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2005.

Statement 123R permits public companies to account for the adoption of this revised standard using one of two methods: the modified-prospective method or the modified-retrospective method. The modified-prospective method requires the company to recognize compensation based upon fair value for only those share-based awards granted with an effective date subsequent to the company’s date of adoption and share-based awards issued in prior periods that remain unvested at the date of adoption. The modified-retrospective method allows companies to restate, based upon pro forma amounts previously disclosed under the requirements of Statement 123, for either all prior periods presented or prior interim periods included in the year of adoption.

The company intends to adopt Statement 123R no later than July 1, 2005, but has yet to determine which of the two methods described above will be utilized. The company continues to evaluate the impact of this proposed statement on its financial position and results of operations.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(continued)

note b

change in method of accounting

Effective January 1, 2002, the company changed its method of accounting for commissions on premiums billed and collected directly by insurance companies on its middle-market property and casualty business. Prior to 2002, this revenue was recognized when received. Beginning January 1, 2002, this revenue is recorded on the later of the billing date or the effective date, consistent with the revenue recognition policy for agency billed business. This is the predominant practice followed in the industry. Management believes that this methodology is preferable and that it better matches the income with the related expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the effect of this change was to increase net income by $5.1 million ($0.15 per share), which included the cumulative effect adjustment of $3.9 million ($0.12 per share), net of income taxes of $2.6 million.

note c

property and equipment

Property and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet consists of the following:

(in thousands)	2004		2003
Furniture and equipment	$	55,474	$	53,962
Buildings and land		—		1,252
Leasehold improvements		9,200		7,973
		64,674		63,187
Less accumulated depreciation		40,650		37,700
	$	24,024	$	25,487

note d

long-term debt

Long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet consists of the following:

(in thousands)	2004		2003
Credit facility, interest currently 4.31% to 4.81%	$	250,000	$	164,287
Installment notes payable primarily incurred in acquisitions of insurance agencies, 1.21% to 10.0% due in various installments to 2008		31,632		19,046
		281,632		183,333
Less current portion		16,248		9,321
	$	265,384	$	174,012

Maturities of long-term debt for the four years ending after December 31, 2005 are $10.0 million in 2006, $5.2 million in 2007, $0.2 million in 2008, $60.0 million in 2009 and $190.0 million thereafter. At December 31, 2004, the company had term loans included in the credit facility with $7.0 million due within one year classified as long-term debt in accordance with the company’s intent and ability to refinance this obligation on a long-term basis under its revolving credit facility.

Interest paid was $10.2 million, $10.9 million and $10.7 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

On December 15, 2004, the company signed the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Amended Credit Agreement) which provided for a revolving credit facility of $175.0 million, a Tranche A term loan of $50.0 million, and a Tranche B term loan of $200.0 million. The Amended Credit Agreement further permits the company to

request additional term borrowings of up to $75.0 million prior to December 31, 2006, and provides that a portion of the revolving credit facility will be available for the issuance of letters of credit. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at variable rates based on LIBOR plus a negotiated spread. In addition, the company pays commitment fees (0.3% at December 31, 2004) on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility. The term loan facility is payable quarterly beginning March 31, 2005, and the revolving credit facility is due and payable upon the maturity date. Both the Tranche A term loan and revolving credit facility mature on December 15, 2009, and the Tranche B term loan matures on December 15, 2011. At December 31, 2004, the company had borrowings of $250.0 million under the term loan facilities and had $174.7 million available for future borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The Amended Credit Agreement represents senior secured indebtedness and contains, among other provisions, requirements for maintaining certain financial ratios and specific limits or restrictions on acquisitions, indebtedness, investments, payment of dividends and repurchase of common stock.

The Amended Credit Agreement replaces the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. At December 31, 2003, the company had borrowings of $154.3 million under the term credit facility of its former credit agreement and had $120.0 million available for future borrowings under the corresponding revolving credit facility. The company recognized losses of $1.6 million related to the extinguishment of the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. This loss on extinguishment primarily included various financing and professional costs previously deferred in connection with the financing of the company’s former credit agreement and certain lending fees paid in obtaining the Amended Credit Agreement.

On July 1, 2004, the company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $30.0 million and a maturity date of June 30, 2007. On December 29, 2004, the company entered into a second interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $20.0 million and a maturity date of December 31, 2010. These two interest rate swap agreements replaced the company’s previous hedging arrangements, which matured on June 30, 2004. The combined notional amount of these former interest rate swaps was originally $45.0 million, which was subsequently reduced by $0.9 million on a quarterly basis beginning September 30, 2000 through their maturity.

The company has designated all of its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges under Statement 133. The company enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest cost and cash flows associated with variable interest rates, primarily short-term changes in LIBOR; changes in cash flows of the interest rate swaps offset changes in the interest payments on the covered portion of the company’s credit facility. The notional amounts of the interest rate swap agreements are used to measure interest to be paid or received and do not represent the amount of exposure to credit loss. The credit risk to the company would be a counterparty’s inability to pay the differential in the fixed rate and variable rate in a rising interest rate environment. The company’s exposure to credit loss on its interest rate swap agreements in the event of non-performance by a counterparty is believed to be remote due to the company’s requirement that a counterparty have a strong credit rating. The company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates.

Under the current interest rate swap agreements, the company makes payments based on fixed pay rates of approximately 4% and receives payments based on the counterparties’ variable LIBOR pay rates. At the end of the year, the variable rate was approximately 2.6% for each agreement. In connection with these interest rate swap agreements, the company recorded after-tax income (loss) in other comprehensive income of $321 thousand, $963 thousand and ($33) thousand in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. There was no impact on net income due to ineffectiveness. The fair market value of the interest rate swaps at December 31, 2004 and 2003, resulted in a liability of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, which is included in other long-term liabilities.

note e

retirement plans

The company sponsors the HRH Retirement Savings Plan (the Retirement Savings Plan) which covered substantially all employees of the company and its subsidiaries. The Retirement Savings Plan, which may be amended or terminated by the company at any time, provides that the company shall contribute a matching contribution of up to 3% of a participant’s eligible compensation and such amounts as the board of directors shall determine to a trust fund.

In 2002, the company acquired Hobbs Group, LLC (Hobbs) (see Note K). Hobbs sponsored the Hobbs Group, LLC 401(k) Savings Plan (the Hobbs Savings Plan) which covered substantially all employees of Hobbs and its subsidiaries. Effective January 1, 2004, the Hobbs Savings Plan was terminated and merged into the Retirement Savings Plan.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(continued)

Prior to merger with the company, certain of the other merged companies had separate profit sharing or benefit plans. These plans were terminated or frozen at the time of merger with the company.

The total expense recorded by the company under the Retirement Savings Plan and the Hobbs Savings Plan for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was approximately $5.3 million, $5.3 million and $4.2 million, respectively.

The company has the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the Plan) for key executives. The Plan provides that participants shall be credited each year with an amount that is calculated by determining the total company match and profit sharing contribution that the participant would have received under the Retirement Savings Plan absent the compensation limitation that applies to such plan, reduced by the amount of actual company match and profit sharing contributions to such plan. The Plan also provides for the crediting of interest to participant accounts. Expense recognized by the company in 2004, 2003 and 2002 related to these Plan provisions amounted to $0.9 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the company’s accrued liability for benefits under the Plan was $3.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively, and is included in other long-term liabilities.

note f

income taxes

The components of income taxes shown in the statement of consolidated income are as follows:

(in thousands)	2004		2003		2002
Current
Federal	$	46,673	$	39,833	$	31,734
State		9,205		6,652		6,606
		55,878		46,485		38,340
Deferred
Federal		568		2,937		3,174
State		117		525		568
		685		3,462		3,742
	$	56,563	$	49,947	$	42,082

Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.

The effective income tax rate varied from the statutory federal income tax rate as follows:

	2004		2003		2002
Statutory federal income tax rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
Tax exempt investment income	(0.1	)	(0.2	)	(0.1	)
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit	4.4		3.8		4.5
Basis difference on sale of insurance accounts	1.0		—		0.1
Other	0.7		1.4		1.3
Effective income tax rate	41.0	%	40.0	%	40.8	%

Income taxes paid were $56.5 million, $33.3 million and $42.0 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Significant components of the company’s deferred tax liabilities and assets on the consolidated balance sheet are as follows:

(in thousands)	2004		2003
Deferred tax liabilities:
Intangible assets	$	45,289	$	26,024
Revenue recognition accounting change (see Note B)		—		649
Other		2,777		3,681
Total deferred tax liabilities		48,066		30,354
Deferred tax assets:
Deferred compensation		11,437		7,461
Allowance for doubtful accounts		1,763		1,598
Deferred rent and income		3,148		1,993
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps		121		334
Retirement benefits		1,049		—
Other		1,743		3,349
Total deferred tax assets		19,261		14,735
Net deferred tax liabilities	$	28,805	$	15,619

note g

leases

The company and its subsidiaries have noncancellable lease contracts for office space, equipment and automobiles which expire at various dates through the year 2018 and generally include escalation clauses for increases in lessors’ operating expenses and increased real estate taxes.

Future minimum rental payments required under such operating leases are summarized as follows (in thousands):

2005	$	26,585
2006		22,707
2007		20,501
2008		16,905
2009		13,133
Thereafter		29,082
	$	128,913

Rental expense for all operating leases in 2004, 2003 and 2002 amounted to $25.5 million, $22.1 million and $18.2 million, respectively. Included in rental expense for 2004, 2003 and 2002 is approximately $1.9 million, $1.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, which was paid to employees or related parties.

note h

shareholders’ equity

The company has adopted and the shareholders have approved the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated in 2003), the Non-employee Directors Stock Incentive Plan and the Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company 1989 Stock Plan which provide for the granting of options to purchase up to an aggregate of approximately 5,465,000

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(continued)

and 5,215,000 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Stock options granted have seven to ten year terms and vest and become fully exercisable at various periods up to five years. Stock option activity under the plans was as follows:

	Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1, 2002	2,494,306	11.79
Granted	1,263,000	41.35
Exercised	358,405	8.77
Expired	34,750	31.61
Outstanding at December 31, 2002	3,364,151	23.00
Granted	650,000	36.72
Exercised	498,675	9.26
Expired	314,175	42.14
Outstanding at December 31, 2003	3,201,301	26.04
Granted	798,250	33.27
Exercised	722,286	10.73
Expired	223,015	35.97
Outstanding at December 31, 2004	3,054,250	30.83
Exercisable at December 31, 2004	1,531,387	26.74
Exercisable at December 31, 2003	1,770,609	18.88
Exercisable at December 31, 2002	1,704,901	12.19

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004:

Options Outstanding					Options Exercisable
Ranges of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable	Weighted Average Exercise Price
$ 4.52 –   9.03	156,550	1.5	$	8.44	156,550	$	8.44
9.03 – 13.55	73,200	3.9		10.75	73,200		10.75
13.55 – 18.06	245,250	3.2		14.18	245,250		14.18
18.06 – 22.58	378,000	3.9		19.32	281,750		19.29
22.58 – 27.09	—	—		—	—		—
27.09 – 31.61	33,250	5.3		29.68	13,309		29.34
31.61 – 36.12	769,600	6.1		33.29	92,500		35.93
36.12 – 40.64	1,083,400	4.8		37.32	511,328		37.35
40.64 – 45.15	315,000	4.5		45.15	157,500		45.15
	3,054,250	4.7	$	30.83	1,531,387	$	26.74

There were 2,155,000 and 2,526,000 shares available for future grant under these plans as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

No compensation expense related to these options was recognized in operations for 2004, 2003 or 2002 except as disclosed in Note N. As disclosed in Note A, the company accounts for its stock options using the intrinsic value method prescribed in APB No. 25. The company has also disclosed in Note A the effect on net income and earnings per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement 123 to its granted stock options.

During 2004, 2003 and 2002, the company awarded 96,950, 142,200 and 56,125 shares, respectively, of restricted stock under the 2000 Stock Plan with a weighted average fair value at the grant date of $33.74, $33.62 and $37.45 per share, respectively. Restricted shares generally vest ratably over a four year period beginning in the second year of continued employment. During 2004, 2003 and 2002, 25,313, 10,476 and 1,850 shares, respectively, of restricted stock were forfeited. Compensation expense related to these awards was $2.5 million, $1.9 million and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

note i

net income per share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:

(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2004		2003		2002
Numerator for basic net income per share — net income	$	81,414	$	74,954	$	65,119
Effect of dilutive securities: 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Debentures1		—		—		955
Numerator for dilutive net income per share — net income available after assumed conversions	$	81,414	$	74,954	$	66,074
Denominator
Weighted average shares		35,535		34,357		29,208
Effect of guaranteed future shares to be issued in connection with agency acquisitions		298		238		32
Denominator for basic net income per share		35,833		34,595		29,240
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options		407		697		1,025
Employee non-vested stock		129		113		148
Contingent stock – acquisitions		124		899		25
5.25% Convertible Subordinated Debentures1		—		—		2,438
Dilutive potential common shares		660		1,709		3,636
Denominator for diluted net income per share — adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions		36,493		36,304		32,876
Net Income Per Share:
Basic	$	2.27	$	2.17	$	2.23
Assuming Dilution	$	2.23	$	2.06	$	2.01

¹ In November 2002, The Phoenix Companies, Inc. converted all of the company’s 5.25% Convertible Subordinated Debentures into 2.8 million shares of the company’s common stock.

note j

intangible assets

The company has adopted Statement 142 on accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets, as disclosed in Note A. In accordance with Statement 142, the company performed the annual impairment tests of goodwill in 2004 and 2003 and the transitional impairment test of goodwill in 2002. No impairment charge resulted from these tests.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(continued)

Intangible assets on the consolidated balance sheet consist of the following:

	2004				2003
(in thousands)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Amortizable intangible assets:
Customer relationships	$	129,687	$	17,797	$	72,074	$	8,952
Noncompete/nonpiracy agreements		49,865		13,729		37,178		10,205
Tradename		1,737		248		3,162		1,258
Total	$	181,289	$	31,774	$	112,414	$	20,415
	Net Carrying Amount				Net Carrying Amount
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Goodwill	$	608,427			$	522,247

Aggregate amortization expense for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $13.8 million, $9.8 million and $5.3 million, respectively.

Future amortization expense is estimated as follows (in thousands):

2005	$	18,329
2006		18,301
2007		18,225
2008		17,976
2009		17,140

The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for 2004 are as follows (in thousands):

Balance as of December 31, 2003	$	522,247
Goodwill acquired		91,482
Goodwill disposed		(5,302	)
Balance as of December 31, 2004	$	608,427

note k

acquisitions

During 2004, the company acquired certain assets and liabilities of nine insurance agencies and other accounts for $142.6 million ($99.1 million in cash, $20.4 million in guaranteed future cash and common stock payments and 667,256 shares of common stock) in purchase accounting transactions. Assets acquired include intangible assets of $146.9 million at the date of purchase. The combined purchase price may be increased by $13.2 million in 2005, $14.6 million in 2006, $11.9 million in 2007 and $1.7 million thereafter based upon net profits realized. For certain acquisitions, the allocation of purchase price is preliminary and subject to refinement as the valuations of certain intangible assets are not final.

During 2003, the company acquired certain assets and liabilities of six insurance agencies and other accounts for $64.4 million ($20.1 million in cash, $15.5 million in guaranteed future cash and common stock payments and 843,106 shares of common stock) in purchase accounting transactions. Assets acquired include intangible assets of $67.9 million at the date of purchase. The combined purchase price increased by $7.8 million in 2004, and may be increased by $13.1 million in 2005, $4.7 million in 2006 and $9.3 million in 2007 based upon net profits realized.

On July 1, 2002, the company acquired all of the issued and outstanding membership interest units of Hobbs, other than those owned by Hobbs IRA Corp. (HIRAC), and all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of HIRAC, pursuant to a purchase agreement dated May 10, 2002, by and among the company, Hobbs, the members of Hobbs (other than HIRAC) and the shareholders of HIRAC.

At the acquisition date, the company paid approximately $116.5 million in cash, which included acquisition costs of $2.3 million and the company’s assumption and retirement of certain debt of Hobbs, and issued to the members of Hobbs (other than HIRAC) and the shareholders of HIRAC an aggregate of 719,729 shares of the company’s common stock valued at $31.6 million. In addition, the company paid contingent consideration in August 2003 consisting of $38.4 million in cash and the issuance of 1,751,747 shares of the company’s common stock valued at $56.7 million. The values of the shares issued were determined based on the average market price of the company’s stock over the period including two days before and after the date at which the number of shares to be issued became fixed.

The company has further agreed to assume and satisfy certain existing deferred compensation and earn-out obligations of Hobbs from Hobbs’ prior acquisitions. The assumed existing earn-outs will be recorded when their respective contingencies are resolved and consideration is paid.

The following unaudited pro forma results of operations of the company give effect to the acquisition of Hobbs as though the transaction had occurred as of the beginning of the following period:

(in thousands)	2002
Total Revenues	$	503,605
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change and extraordinary item	$	64,035
Net Income	$	67,568
Income per share before cumulative effect of accounting change and extraordinary item:
Basic	$	2.16
Assuming Dilution	$	1.96
Net Income Per Share:
Basic	$	2.28
Assuming Dilution	$	2.06

The pro forma net income results for 2002 include a cumulative effect of accounting change of $3.9 million ($0.12 per share) related to the company’s change in revenue recognition policy (see Note B) and an extraordinary loss of $0.4 million ($0.01 per share) related to Hobbs’ debt extinguishment.

During 2002, the company acquired certain assets and liabilities of six other insurance agencies and other accounts for $11.1 million ($9.8 million in cash and $1.3 million in guaranteed cash and common stock future payments) in purchase accounting transactions. Assets acquired include intangible assets of $11.0 million at the date of purchase. The combined purchase price was increased by $1.2 million in 2004 and $3.2 million in 2003 and may be increased by $0.9 million in 2005 based upon net profits realized.

The financial statements of the company reflect the combined operations of the company and each acquisition from the respective closing date of each acquisition.

note l

sale of assets

During 2004, 2003 and 2002, the company disposed of certain insurance accounts and other assets resulting in net gains of approximately $2.1 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively. These amounts are included in other revenues in the statement of consolidated income. Taxes related to these gains were $2.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Revenues, expenses and assets of these operations were not material to the consolidated financial statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(continued)

note m

integration costs

The company began the integration of Hobbs subsequent to June 30, 2003 with the completion of the Hobbs earn-out. The company recognized integration costs of $1.9 million and $4.1 million and related income taxes of $0.8 million and $1.6 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. These amounts represent costs such as severance and other employee-related costs, facility costs and branding expenses. Included as severance cost in 2003 is $2.2 million related to a contractual termination benefit for Hobbs’ former chief executive officer.

note n

retirement benefit

In March 2003, Andrew L. Rogal, the company’s former chairman and chief executive officer, announced his decision to retire for personal reasons following the company’s annual meeting of shareholders on May 6, 2003. In the first quarter of 2003, the company recorded a one-time retirement benefit charge of $5.2 million, and related income taxes of $2.0 million, representing a contractual retirement benefit for Mr. Rogal. The charge consists primarily of compensation and the accelerated vesting of stock options and non-vested stock.

note o

commitments and contingencies

Included in cash and cash equivalents and premium deposits and credits due customers are approximately $6.3 million and $3.3 million of funds held in escrow at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In addition, premiums collected from insureds but not yet remitted to insurance companies are restricted as to use by laws in certain states in which the company operates. The amount of cash and cash equivalents so restricted was approximately $49.6 million and $54.9 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

The company is generally involved in routine insurance policy related litigation. Several suits have been brought against the company involving settlement of various insurance matters where customers are seeking both punitive and compensatory damages. Management, upon the advice of counsel, is of the opinion that such suits are substantially without merit, that valid defenses exist and that such litigation will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

The company has been named as a defendant in certain legal proceedings against brokers and insurers relating to broker compensation arrangements and other business practices. In August 2004, OptiCare Health Systems Inc. filed a putative class action suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 04-CV-06954) against a number of the country’s largest insurance brokers, including the company, and several large commercial insurers. In the amended complaint, the plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the broker defendants engaged in improper steering of clients to the insurer defendants for the purpose of obtaining undisclosed additional compensation in the form of commissions from insurers; that the defendants were engaged in a bid-rigging scheme involving the submission of false and/or inflated bids from insurers to clients; and that the broker defendants entered into unlawful tying arrangements to obtain reinsurance business from the defendant insurers. The plaintiff alleges violations of federal and state antitrust laws, conspiracy and violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and (d), fraudulent concealment, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and violation of state unfair and deceptive practices statutes. The plaintiff seeks monetary relief, including treble damages, an injunction, costs and other relief. On February 17, 2005, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the Panel) ordered that this case, along with three other purported antitrust class actions filed in New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania against industry participants, be centralized and transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The company has not yet filed a responsive pleading in this case but believes it has substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend itself vigorously.

In December 2004, two other purported class action suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, by Stephen Lewis (Case No. 04-C-7847) and Diane Preuss (Case No. 04-C-7853), respectively, against certain insurance brokers, including the company, and several large commercial insurers. Neither complaint has been served on the company. In the complaints, plaintiffs allege, among other things, that the defendants were involved in a scheme to manipulate the market for commercial insurance by steering clients to the insurer defendants for the purpose of obtaining undisclosed additional compensation in the form of commissions from insurers and by engaging in a bid-rigging scheme using false and/or inflated bids from insurers to clients. The plaintiffs allege violations of federal and state antitrust laws, conspiracy and violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and (d), fraudulent concealment, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and violation of state unfair and deceptive practices statutes. The plaintiffs seek monetary relief, including treble damages, an injunction, costs and other relief. These two lawsuits were not specifically identified in the order issued by the Panel transferring the OptiCare litigation to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, as noted above, but the Panel noted in its order that additional related actions had been filed in certain other jurisdictions, including cases in the Northern District of Illinois, and that those actions would be treated as potential “tag-along” actions. Accordingly, the Lewis and Preuss cases also may be subject to transfer by the Panel. The company believes it has substantial defenses to the claims made in the Lewis and Preuss cases and intends to defend itself vigorously.

There are in the normal course of business various other outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities. Management does not anticipate material losses as a result of such matters.

note p

quarterly results of operations (unaudited)

The following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:

	Three Months Ended 1
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
2004
Total Revenues	$	158,227	$	147,755	$	153,700	$	159,921
Net Income		24,234		20,504		21,349		15,327
Net Income Per Share:
Basic		0.68		0.57		0.60		0.43
Assuming Dilution		0.67		0.56		0.58		0.42
2003
Total Revenues	$	141,991	$	139,534	$	139,374	$	142,748
Net Income		18,098		19,065		18,385		19,405
Net Income Per Share:
Basic		0.54		0.56		0.52		0.54
Assuming Dilution		0.51		0.52		0.50		0.53

¹ Quarterly financial information is affected by seasonal variations. The timing of contingent commissions, policy renewals and acquisitions may cause revenues, expenses and net income to vary significantly from quarter to quarter.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting

Firm on Financial Statements

Shareholders and Board of Directors

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note B to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 the company changed its method of accounting for commissions on premiums billed and collected directly by insurance companies on its middle-market property and casualty business.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 14, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia

March 14, 2005

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over

Financial Reporting

Management of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs (the company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Under the supervision of the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, the company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In conducting its evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, management has excluded the following acquisitions completed by the company in 2004: Casey, Wolfe & Martin, Inc.; The Federau Group; Banack Insurance Agency, Inc.; Rose Smith Tucker, LLC; T. J. Adams Group, LLC; Frank F. Haack & Associates, Inc.; Insurance Services, Inc.; Surplus, Ltd.; and Smith, Bell & Thompson, Inc., which are included in the 2004 consolidated financial statements and constituted less than 15.2% of total assets as of December 31, 2004 and less than 4.2% of revenues and 1.3% of net income for the year then ended.

Based on its assessment using the criteria outlined in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by COSO, management has determined that the company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that has also audited the company’s consolidated financial statements, as stated in accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

/s/ Martin L. Vaughan, III	/s/ Carolyn Jones
Martin L. Vaughan, III	Carolyn Jones
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company Glen Allen, Virginia March 14, 2005

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting

Firm on Internal Control Over

Financial Reporting

Shareholders and Board of Directors

Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the following acquisitions completed by Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company in 2004: Casey, Wolfe & Martin, Inc.; The Federau Group; Banack Insurance Agency, Inc.; Rose Smith Tucker, LLC; T. J. Adams Group, LLC; Frank F. Haack & Associates, Inc.; Insurance Services, Inc.; Surplus, Ltd.; and Smith, Bell & Thompson, Inc., which are included in the

2004 consolidated financial statements of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and constituted less than 15.2% of total assets as of December 31, 2004 and 4.2% and 1.3% of revenues and net income, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the entities referred to above.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 and our report dated March 14, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia

March 14, 2005

EX-21

Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company

Name of Subsidiary	State/Province of Incorporation
Bay Technology Group LLC	Delaware
Bliss & Glennon, Inc. (3 locations)	California
Essenale, Ltd.	Bermuda
Frank F. Haack & Associates, Inc.	Wisconsin
Freberg Environmental, Inc. (4 locations)	Colorado
HRH Financial Institutions Group, Inc.	Pennsylvania
HRH Insurance Services of Nevada, Inc.	Nevada
HRH Consulting Group, LLC	New York
HRH Securities, LLC	New York
HRH Security Services, Inc. (4 locations)	Pennsylvania
Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Insurance Services of Orange County, Inc.	California
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Alabama, Inc. (5 locations)	Alabama
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Appleton, Inc.	Wisconsin
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Arizona, Inc. (3 locations)	Arizona
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Atlanta, Inc.	Georgia
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Baltimore, Inc.	Maryland
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Chicago, Inc.	Illinois
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Colorado, Inc.	Colorado
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Connecticut, LLC (3 locations)	Connecticut
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Gainesville, Inc.	Georgia
Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company of Gainesville, Florida, Inc.	Florida
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Grand Rapids, Inc.	Michigan
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Illinois, LLC	Illinois
Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company of Illinois (2 locations)	Illinois

Exhibit 21 (Continued)

Subsidiaries of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company

Name of Subsidiary	State/Province of Incorporation
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Kansas, Inc. (3 locations)	Kansas
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Lansing, Inc. (2 locations)	Michigan
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Massachusetts, LLC (3 locations)	Virginia
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Metropolitan Washington, Inc.	Delaware
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Nebraska, Inc.	Nebraska
Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company of New York, LLC	New York
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Northern New England, Inc. (4 locations)	Maine
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Northern New Jersey, LLC (2 locations)	New Jersey
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Oak Brook, LLC	Illinois
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Ohio, Inc.	Ohio
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Oklahoma, Inc.	Oklahoma
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Oregon, Inc. (2 locations)	Oregon
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Orlando, Inc.	Florida
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Philadelphia, LLC	Pennsylvania
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Pittsburgh, LLC	Pennsylvania
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Port Huron, Inc.	Michigan
Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company of San Antonio, Inc. (2 locations)	Texas
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Savannah, Inc.	Georgia
Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company of South Florida, Inc.	Florida
Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company of Southwest Florida, Inc.	Florida
Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Company of Tampa Bay, Inc.	Florida
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Tennessee, Inc.	Tennessee
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Texas, LP (14 locations)	Texas
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Upstate New York, LLC (2 locations)	Delaware
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Vero Beach, Inc.	Florida

Exhibit 21 (Continued)

Subsidiaries of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company

Name of Subsidiary	State/Province of Incorporation
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Virginia (3 locations)	Virginia
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Insurance Services of Aliso Viejo, LLC	California
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Insurance Services of California, Inc. (28 locations)	California
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Insurance Services of Long Beach, LLC	California
Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Services Company	Virginia
Hobbs Group Insurance Brokers, LLC (11 locations)	Massachusetts
Hobbs Group Investment Advisors, LLC	Delaware
Hobbs Group, Inc.	Maryland
Hobbs Group, Inc.	Massachusetts
Hobbs Group, Inc. (2 locations)	Texas
Hobbs Group (NY), LLC (10 locations)	New York
Hunt Insurance Group, Inc.	Florida
Integrated Risk Solutions Insurance Services, LLC	California
Integrated Risk Solutions Insurance Services, LLC	Delaware
Kirklin & Company, LLC	Delaware
Maclean, Oddy & Associates, Inc.	Texas
New World E & S, LLC	Delaware
NIB/Lees Preston Ltd.	United Kingdom
Oakley Holdings Ltd.	United Kingdom
Premium Funding Associates, Inc.	Connecticut
Professional Practice Insurance Brokers, Inc. (Southeast)	North Carolina
Smith, Bell and Thompson, Inc.	Vermont
Thomas M. Murphy & Associates, Inc.	Connecticut

Exhibit 21 (Continued)

Subsidiaries of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company

Name of Subsidiary	State/Province of Incorporation
The Managing Agency Group, Inc.	Connecticut
Westport Financial Services, LLC (5 locations)	Delaware
Westport Insurance Agency, Inc.	Delaware
Westport Insurance Agency, LLC	Delaware
Westport Insurance Brokerage, LLC	Massachusetts
Westport Insurance Agency, LLC	Texas
Westport Worldwide, LLC	Delaware

Each of the above subsidiaries is 100% owned by the registrant except for NIB/Lees Preston Ltd. and Oakley Holdings Ltd. which are owned 70% by the registrant.

EX-23

Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company of our reports dated March 11, 2005, with respect to the Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, included in the 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-103191, Form S-8 333-103262, Form S-8 333-44735, Form S-8 No. 333-53417, Form S-8 333-93633, Form S-8 No. 333-30650, Form S-8 333-37142, Form S-8 No. 333-110666, Form S-4 No. 333-50018, Form S-8 No. 333-74344, Form S-8 No. 333-74340, Form S-3 No. 333-99873 and Form S-3 No. 333-74564) of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, included and incorporated by reference into this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia

March 14, 2005

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a)

I, Martin L. Vaughan, III, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date	March 14, 2005	/s/ Martin L. Vaughan, III
		Martin L. Vaughan, III
		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a)

I, Carolyn Jones, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date	March 14, 2005	/s/ Carolyn Jones
		Carolyn Jones
		Senior Vice President, Chief     Financial Officer and Treasurer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-K of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, I, Martin L. Vaughan, III, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and its subsidiaries as of and for the periods presented in such Form 10-K.

By:	/s/ Martin L. Vaughan, III	Date:	March 14, 2005
	Martin L. Vaughan, III
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-K of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, I, Carolyn Jones, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and its subsidiaries as of and for the periods presented in such Form 10-K.

By:	/s/ Carolyn Jones	Date:	March 14, 2005
	Carolyn Jones
	Senior Vice President, Chief
	Financial Officer and Treasurer