N-14 1 tm2224434d1_n14.htm N-14

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2022.

File No.: 333-

File No.: 811-05186

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM N-14

REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 x

Pre-Effective Amendment No. ¨
Post-Effective Amendment No. ¨
(Check appropriate box or boxes)

ADVANCED SERIES TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(203) 926-1888
(Area Code and Telephone Number)

655 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
Address of Principal Executive Offices:
(Number, Street, City, State, Zip Code)

Andrew R. French
Secretary, Advanced Series Trust
655 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
Name and Address of Agent for Service:
(Number and Street) (City) (State) (Zip Code)

Copies to:
Christopher E. Palmer, Esq.
Goodwin Procter LLP
1900 N Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036

Approximate Date of Proposed Public Offering:

As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

It is proposed that this filing will become effective on the 30th day after filing pursuant to Rule 488 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Title of the securities being registered: Shares of the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio of Advanced Series Trust.

No filing fee is due because Registrant is relying on Section 24(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

Advanced Series Trust
655 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
Telephone 888-778-2888

September 30, 2022

Dear Contract Owner,

As a contract owner who beneficially owns shares of the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio (the “Target Portfolio”) of the Advanced Series Trust (the “Trust” or “AST”), you are cordially invited to a Special Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) scheduled to be held on November 11, 2022, at 9:30 am Eastern time.

Generally, we hold special meetings in person. However, we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our shareholders may have, and recommendations that public health officials may issue, relating to the evolving situation with respect to the novel coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”). As a result, the Meeting will be conducted solely by means of remote communication. Shareholders will not be able to attend the Meeting in person. Any shareholders wishing to participate in the Meeting by means of remote communication can do so at http://viewproxy.com/AST/broadridgevsm/.

The Meeting is very important to the future of the Target Portfolio. At the Meeting, the shareholders of the Target Portfolio will be asked to approve a Plan of Reorganization of the Target Portfolio (the “Plan”). As more fully explained in the attached Prospectus/Proxy Statement, the Plan provides for the transfer of all of the Target Portfolio’s assets to the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio (the “Acquiring Portfolio”) of the Trust in exchange for (i) the Acquiring Portfolio’s assumption of all of the Target Portfolio’s liabilities, and (ii) the Acquiring Portfolio’s issuance to the Target Portfolio of shares of beneficial interest in the Acquiring Portfolio (the “Reorganization”). The Acquiring Portfolio will be the accounting and performance survivor of the Reorganization, and the combined portfolio resulting from the Reorganization is sometimes referred to herein as the “Combined Portfolio.”

On June 30, 2022, the Target Portfolio was repositioned, which involved (i) replacing Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC with PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC, PGIM, Inc., PGIM Limited, and Wellington Management Company LLP, and (ii) revising the investment strategy of the Target Portfolio (the “Repositioning”).

If the Plan is approved and the Reorganization is completed, you will beneficially own shares of the Acquiring Portfolio, rather than shares of the Target Portfolio. It is expected that the Reorganization, if approved, would be completed on or about December 5, 2022.

The Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board”) has approved the Reorganization and recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal. Although the Board has determined that the proposal is in your best interest, the final decision is yours. Based on information available, assuming the Reorganization had been in effect for the one-year period ended June 30, 2022 as indicted below, the Reorganization is expected to benefit shareholders for several reasons, including that:

The investment objectives and the principal investment strategies of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are similar in that the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio invest (or will invest) approximately 60% of its assets in a combination of domestic and international equity strategies, and approximately 40% of its assets in a combination of US fixed income, global hedged bond, and emerging market bond investment strategies;

The Combined Portfolio will be larger than the Target Portfolio or the Acquiring Portfolio, with an estimated $12,099 million based on net assets as of June 30, 2022;

The contractual investment management fee rates for the Combined Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are lower than the contractual investment management fee rate for the Target Portfolio, and the effective investment management fee rates for the Combined Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are lower than effective investment management fee rate for the Target Portfolio;

The total net operating expense ratio for the Target Portfolio is higher than the total net operating expense ratio for the Acquiring Portfolio and, assuming the Repositioning and the Reorganization had been in effect for the one-year period ended June 30, 2022, is higher than the pro forma total net operating expense ratio for the Combined Portfolio; and

The pro forma composite hypothetical performance of the Combined Portfolio for the one, three, five- and ten-year periods ended June 30, 2022 is better than the performance of the Target Portfolio for those same periods prior to the Repositioning, and, assuming the Repositioning had been in effect and reflecting the proposed subadvisers and investment strategies to be implemented as part of the Repositioning, the pro forma composite hypothetical performance of the Combined Portfolio for the one-, five- and ten-year periods ended June 30, 2022 is better than the performance of the Target Portfolio for those same periods.

The following pages include important information on the proposed Reorganization in a question and answer format. The pages that follow include the full Prospectus/Proxy Statement with detailed information regarding the Reorganization. Please read the full document, including the detailed description of the factors considered by the Board.

Your vote is important no matter how large or small your investment. We urge you to read the attached Prospectus/Proxy Statement thoroughly and to indicate your voting instructions on the enclosed voting instruction card, date and sign it, and return it promptly in the envelope provided. Alternatively, you may submit your vote by telephone by calling toll-free 1-800-690-6903 or you may vote over the Internet by going to www.proxyvote.com. Your voting instructions must be received by the Trust prior to November 11, 2022. The Target Portfolio shares that you beneficially own will be voted in accordance with the most current instructions received from you. All shares of the Target Portfolio, including Target Portfolio shares owned by a participating insurance company in its general account or otherwise, for which instructions are not received from contract owners will be voted by the participating insurance companies in the same proportion as the votes actually cast by contract owners regarding the Reorganization. Please see the Voting Information section of the Prospectus/Proxy Statement for additional information.

By voting now, you can help avoid additional costs that would be incurred with follow-up letters and calls.

For any questions or concerns you may have regarding the proposed Reorganization, please call 1-800-752-6342 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday-Thursday, and 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Fridays.

Sincerely,

Timothy Cronin
President
Advanced Series Trust

IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO HELP YOU UNDERSTAND AND VOTE ON THE PROPOSAL

Please read the attached Prospectus/Proxy Statement for a complete description of the proposal. However, as a quick reference, the following questions and answers provide a brief overview of the proposal.

Q1. WHY AM I RECEIVING THIS PROXY STATEMENT?

A. You have received these proxy materials and are being asked to provide voting instructions to your insurance company on the proposal because you are the beneficial owner of shares of the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio (the “Target Portfolio”), a series of the Advanced Series Trust (the “Trust” or “AST”). The Target Portfolio is seeking shareholder consideration and approval of an important proposal.

Q2. WHAT PROPOSAL AM I BEING ASKED TO VOTE ON?

A. The purpose of the proxy is to ask you to vote on the reorganization (the “Reorganization”) of the Target Portfolio into the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio (the “Acquiring Portfolio”), which is a series of the Trust. The proposal is recommended by PGIM Investments LLC and AST Investment Services, Inc., which serve as the investment managers to the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio, and has been approved by the Board of Trustees of AST (the “Board”). The Acquiring Portfolio will be the accounting and performance survivor of the Reorganization, and the combined portfolio resulting from the Reorganization is sometimes referred to herein as the “Combined Portfolio.”

Q3. HOW WILL THE PROPOSAL IMPACT FEES AND EXPENSES?

A. If the proposal is approved, it is expected that the total net operating expense ratio of the Combined Portfolio will be lower than the total net operating expense ratio of the Target Portfolio, meaning that shareholders of the Target Portfolio will see a reduction in the operating expenses that they pay. As a result, it is expected that the Target Portfolio’s shareholders will benefit from decreased expenses. Please read the attached Prospectus/Proxy Statement for a complete description of the fees and expenses.

Q4. HOW WILL THE REORGANIZATION BENEFIT SHAREHOLDERS?

A. Based on information available, assuming the Reorganization had been in effect for the one-year period ended June 30, 2022 as indicted below, the Reorganization is expected to benefit shareholders for several reasons, including that:

The Combined Portfolio will be larger than the Target Portfolio or the Acquiring Portfolio, with an estimated $12,099 million based on net assets as of June 30, 2022;

Please read pages [ ] of the attached Prospectus/Proxy Statement for a complete description of each of the factors the Board considered.

Q5. WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THE TARGET PORTFOLIO’S CURRENT INVESTMENTS?

A. As explained further in the attached Prospectus/Proxy Statement, effective on the date of the Reorganization, which is expected to be on or about December 5, 2022, the Combined Portfolio will be subadvised by, Massachusetts Financial Services Company, J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., Jennison Associates LLC, PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC, PGIM, Inc., PGIM Limited, and Wellington Management Company LLP in accordance with the Acquiring Portfolio’s current investment objective, investment policies, and principal investment strategies. The extent to which the securities of the Target Portfolio will be maintained by the Acquiring Portfolio will be determined consistent with the Combined Portfolio’s investment objective and strategies, in effect as of the date of the Reorganization.

Please read pages [ ] of the attached Prospectus/Proxy Statement for a complete description of the Acquiring Portfolio’s investment objective, strategies and policies.

Q6. HAS THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TRUST APPROVED THE PROPOSAL?

A. Yes. The Board has approved the proposal and unanimously recommends that you vote in favor of the proposal.

See pages [ ] of the attached Prospectus/Proxy Statement for the complete list of factors considered by the Board in making its recommendation.

Q7. WHO IS PAYING FOR THE COSTS OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT?

A. A significant portion of the costs incurred in entering into and carrying out the terms and conditions of the Reorganization, regardless of whether approved by shareholders, including (without limitation) outside legal counsel and independent registered public accounting firm costs and costs incurred in connection with the printing and mailing of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement and related materials, will be paid by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC or its affiliates.

The transaction costs to be paid by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC or its affiliates are expected to be approximately $955,000, which is approximately 0.8 basis points of the Combined Portfolio.

Q8. HOW MANY VOTES AM I ENTITLED TO SUBMIT?

A. The record date is August 19, 2022. As a contract owner, you are entitled to give your voting instructions equivalent to one vote for each full share and a fractional vote for each fractional share related to your indirect investment in the Target Portfolio as of the record date.

Q9. WHEN WILL THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TAKE PLACE?

A. The shareholder meeting (the “Meeting”) is scheduled to take place on November 11, 2022, at 9:30 a.m. Eastern time.

Q10. HOW DO I VOTE?

A. Your vote is very important. You can vote in the following ways:

Attending the Meeting via remote communication at http://viewproxy.com/AST/broadridgevsm/. Please visit the Meeting website no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the day before the Meeting to register. Shareholders will need to register for the Meeting by entering the control number found on the proxy card or voting instruction form on the Meeting website;

Completing and signing the enclosed voting instruction card, and mailing it in the enclosed postage paid envelope. Voting instruction cards must be received by the day before the Meeting;

Calling toll-free 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions. Voting instructions submitted by telephone must be submitted by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on the day before the Meeting; or

Online at www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions. Voting instructions submitted over the Internet must be submitted by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on the day before the Meeting.

Q11. HOW CAN I CHANGE MY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS?

A. Previously submitted voting instructions may be revoked or changed by any of the voting methods described above, subject to the voting deadlines also discussed above. Please see the Voting Information section of the Prospectus/Proxy Statement for additional information.

Q12. WHEN WILL THE PROPOSED REORGANIZATION TAKE PLACE?

A. If approved, the proposed Reorganization is currently expected to go into effect on or about December 5, 2022.

Q13. CAN THE PROXY STATEMENT BE VIEWED ONLINE?

A. Yes. The proxy statement can be viewed at www.prudential.com/variableinsuranceportfolios.

Q14. WHAT IF I HAVE QUESTIONS ON THE PROPOSED REORGANIZATION?

A. If you require assistance or have any questions regarding the proxy statement, please call 1-800-752-6342 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday-Thursday, or between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Fridays.

Q15. WILL SHAREHOLDERS BE ALLOWED TO TRANSFER OUT OF THE TARGET PORTFOLIO WITHOUT PENALTY AND WITHOUT BEING REQUIRED TO USE ONE OF THEIR ALLOTTED TRANSFERS?

A. Yes. Contract owners will be allowed one free transfer out of the Target Portfolio during the period within 60 days of the effective date of the Reorganization (i.e., from 60 days before to 60 days after the effective date of the Reorganization).

AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio

655 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 11, 2022

To the Shareholders of the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio, a series of the Advanced Series Trust:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) of the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio (the “Target Portfolio”), a series of the Advanced Series Trust (the “Trust” or “AST”), will be held on November 11, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. Eastern time.

The purposes of the Meeting are as follows:

I. To approve a Plan of Reorganization of the Trust on behalf of the Target Portfolio (the “Plan”) regarding the proposed reorganization of the Target Portfolio into the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio (the “Acquiring Portfolio”), a series of the Trust.

As described in more detail below, the Plan provides for the transfer of all of the Target Portfolio’s assets to the Acquiring Portfolio in exchange for (i) the Acquiring Portfolio’s assumption of all of the Target Portfolio’s liabilities, and (ii) the Acquiring Portfolio’s issuance to the Target Portfolio of shares of beneficial interest in the Acquiring Portfolio (the “Acquiring Portfolio Shares”). The Acquiring Portfolio Shares received by the Target Portfolio will have an aggregate net asset value that is equal to the aggregate net asset value of the Target Portfolio shares that are outstanding immediately prior to the reorganization transaction. As a result of such transaction, the Target Portfolio will be completely liquidated, and Contract owners will beneficially own shares of the Acquiring Portfolio having an aggregate value equal to their Target Portfolio shares. A vote in favor of the Plan by shareholders of the Target Portfolio will constitute a vote in favor of the liquidation of the Target Portfolio and the termination of the Target Portfolio as a separate series of the Trust. The Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board”) unanimously recommends that you vote in favor of the proposal.

II. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

A copy of the Plan is attached as Exhibit A to the Prospectus/Proxy Statement.

The acquisition of the assets of the Target Portfolio by the Acquiring Portfolio in exchange for the Acquiring Portfolio’s assumption of all of the liabilities of the Target Portfolio, and the issuance of Acquiring Portfolio Shares to the Target Portfolio and its shareholders, is referred to herein as the “Reorganization.” If shareholders of the Target Portfolio approve the Plan and the Reorganization is consummated, they will become shareholders of the Acquiring Portfolio.

The matters referred to above are discussed in detail in the Prospectus/Proxy Statement attached to this notice. The Board has fixed the close of business on August 19, 2022, as the record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, and only holders of record of shares of the Target Portfolio at the close of business on that date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting or any adjournment thereof. Each full share of the Target Portfolio is entitled to one vote on the proposal, and each fractional share of the Target Portfolio is entitled to a corresponding fractional vote on the proposal.

You are cordially invited to attend the Meeting. If you do not expect to attend the Meeting, you are requested to complete, date and sign the enclosed voting instruction card relating to the Meeting and return it promptly in the envelope provided for that purpose. Alternatively, you may vote by telephone or over the Internet, as described in the Prospectus/Proxy Statement attached to this notice. The enclosed voting instruction card is being solicited on behalf of the Board.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT NO MATTER HOW LARGE OR SMALL YOUR INVESTMENT MAY BE. IN ORDER TO AVOID THE UNNECESSARY EXPENSE OF FURTHER SOLICITATION, WE URGE YOU TO INDICATE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS ON THE ENCLOSED VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD, DATE AND SIGN IT, AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. ALTERNATIVELY, YOU MAY VOTE BY TELEPHONE BY CALLING 1-800-690-6903 AND FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS. YOU MAY ALSO VOTE OVER THE INTERNET AT WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM. YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR VOTING INSTRUCTIONS AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO THE MEETING.

By order of the Board of Trustees of the Advanced Series Trust.

Andrew French

Secretary

Advanced Series Trust

The information in this Prospectus/Proxy Statement is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This Prospectus/Proxy Statement is not an offer to sell these securities, and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS/PROXY STATEMENT

September 30, 2022

PROXY STATEMENT
for
AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio,
A SERIES OF THE ADVANCED SERIES TRUST
and
PROSPECTUS
for
AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio,
A SERIES OF THE ADVANCED SERIES TRUST

Dated September 30, 2022

655 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102

Telephone 888-778-2888

Reorganization of the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio
into the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio

This Prospectus/Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with a Special Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) of the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio (the “Target Portfolio”), a series of the Advanced Series Trust (the “Trust” or “AST”). At the Meeting, you will be asked to consider and approve a Plan of Reorganization of the Trust (the “Plan”) that provides for the reorganization of the Target Portfolio into the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio (the “Acquiring Portfolio,” and together with the Target Portfolio, the “Portfolios”), a series of the Trust.

The Meeting will be held on November 11, 2022, at 9:30 a.m. Eastern time. The Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board”) is soliciting these voting instructions on behalf of the Target Portfolio and has fixed the close of business on August 19, 2022 (the “Record Date”), as the record date for determining Target Portfolio shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting or any adjournment thereof. Only holders of record of shares of the Target Portfolio at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting or any adjournment thereof. This Prospectus/Proxy Statement is first being sent to Contract owners on or about September 30, 2022.

The investment objective of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are the same. The investment objectives of Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are listed below:

Target Portfolio Name		Investment Objective
AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio		to obtain the highest potential total return consistent with its specified level of risk tolerance

Acquiring Portfolio Name		Investment Objective
AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio		to obtain the highest potential total return consistent with its specified level of risk tolerance

The Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio serve as underlying mutual funds for variable annuity contracts (the “Contracts”) issued by life insurance companies (“Participating Insurance Companies”). Each Participating Insurance Company holds assets invested in these Contracts in various separate accounts, each of which is divided into sub-accounts investing exclusively in a mutual fund or in a portfolio of a mutual fund. Therefore, Contract owners who have allocated their account values to applicable sub-accounts are indirectly invested in the Target Portfolio through the Contracts and should consider themselves shareholders of the Target Portfolio for purposes of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement. Each Participating Insurance Company is required to offer Contract owners the opportunity to instruct it, as owner of record of shares held in the Target Portfolio by its separate or general accounts, how it should vote on the Plan at the Meeting and at any adjournments thereof.

This Prospectus/Proxy Statement gives the information about the Reorganization and the issuance of the Acquiring Portfolio Shares that you should know before investing or voting on the Plan. You should read it carefully and retain it for future reference. A copy of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement is available on the internet at www.prudential.com/variableinsuranceportfolios. Additional information about the Acquiring Portfolio has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including:

The Summary Prospectus of the Trust relating to the Acquiring Portfolio under file number 033-24962, dated April 25, 2022, which is incorporated herein by reference as is included with, and considered to be part of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement.

Supplement to the Summary Prospectus of the Trust relating to the Acquiring Portfolio under file number 033-24962, dated June 27, 2022, which is incorporated herein by reference as is included with, and considered to be part of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement.

You may request a free copy of a Statement of Additional Information under file number 033-24962, dated April 25, 2022 (the “SAI”), or other documents relating to the Trust and the Acquiring Portfolio without charge by calling 1-800-778-2255 or by writing to the Trust at 655 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102. The SAI, under file number 033-24962, is incorporated herein by reference. The SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains the SAI and other information relating to the Target Portfolio, the Acquiring Portfolio, and the Trust that has been filed with the SEC.

The SEC has not approved or disapproved these securities or passed upon the adequacy of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Mutual fund shares are not deposits or obligations of, or guaranteed or endorsed by, any bank, and are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other U.S. government agency. Mutual fund shares involve investment risks, including the possible loss of principal.

PROSPECTUS/PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

SUMMARY			1
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REORGANIZATION			6
COMPARISON OF THE TARGET PORTFOLIO, THE ACQUIRING PORTFOLIO, AND THE COMBINED PORTFOLIO			10
MANAGEMENT OF THE TARGET PORTFOLIO, THE ACQUIRING PORTFOLIO, AND THE COMBINED PORTFOLIO			22
VOTING INFORMATION			29
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE TARGET PORTFOLIO AND THE ACQUIRING PORTFOLIO			30
PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SHARES			31
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS			32

SUMMARY

This section is only a summary of certain information contained in this Prospectus/Proxy Statement. You should read the more complete information in the rest of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement, including the Plan (Exhibit A) and the Prospectus for the Acquiring Portfolio (Exhibit B).

As explained in more detail below, you are being asked to consider and approve the Plan with respect to the Target Portfolio for which you are a beneficial shareholder. Shareholder approval of the Plan and consummation of the Reorganization will have the effect of reorganizing the Target Portfolio into the Acquiring Portfolio, resulting in a single mutual fund.

As further explained in “Management of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio,” PGIM Investments (“PGIM Investments”) and AST Investment Services, Inc. (“ASTIS,” and together with PGIM Investments, the “Manager”) serve as investment managers to the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio. The Acquiring Portfolio will be the accounting and performance survivor of the Reorganization, and the combined portfolio resulting from the Reorganization is sometimes referred to herein as the “Combined Portfolio.”

The Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are managed under a manager-of-managers structure, which means that the Manager has engaged each subadviser listed below to conduct the investment program of the relevant Portfolio, including the purchase, retention, and sale of portfolio securities and other financial instruments. The Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio have the same distribution and purchase procedures and exchange rights, and redemption procedures.

Portfolio		Subadvisers
AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio		PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC (“PGIM Quant”), PGIM, Inc. (“PGIM Fixed Income”), PGIM Limited, and Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington”)
AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio		Massachusetts Financial Services Company (“MFS”), J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (“J.P. Morgan”), Jennison Associates LLC (“Jennison”), PGIM Quant, PGIM Fixed Income, PGIM Limited, and Wellington
Combined Portfolio		MFS, J.P. Morgan, Jennison, PGIM Quant, PGIM Fixed Income, PGIM Limited, and Wellington

Because of the federal tax-deferred treatment applicable to the Contracts, completion of the Reorganization is not expected to result in taxable gains or losses or capital gains or losses, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, to Contract owners that beneficially own shares of the Target Portfolio immediately prior to the Reorganization.

Comparison of Investment Objectives and Principal Investment Strategies of the Portfolios

The investment objectives of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are the same. The investment objective of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio is to obtain the highest potential total return consistent with its specified level of risk tolerance. The investment objectives of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are non-fundamental, meaning that they can be changed by the Board without shareholder approval.

The Portfolios also have substantially similar principal investment strategies. The Portfolios’ asset allocation generally provides for an allotment of approximately 60% of Portfolio assets to a combination of domestic and international equity strategies and an allotment of approximately 40% of Portfolio assets to a combination of US fixed income and global hedged bond investment strategies.

As explained above, as of the effective date of the Reorganization, the Combined Portfolio will be managed by the Acquiring Portfolio’s subadvisers MFS, J.P. Morgan, Jennison, PGIM Quant, PGIM Fixed Income, PGIM Limited, and Wellington, according to the investment objective and principal investment strategies of the Acquiring Portfolio.

Principal Risks of the Portfolios

The principal risks associated with the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are similar. Both Portfolios are subject to asset-backed and/or mortgage-backed securities risk, asset transfer program risk, blend style risk, derivatives risk, economic and market events risk, equity securities risk, exchange-traded funds (ETF) risk, expense risk, fixed income securities risk, foreign investment risk, high yield risk, liquidity and valuation risk, market and management risk, and regulatory risk. In addition, the Target Portfolio, but not the Acquiring Portfolio, is subject commodity risk, emerging markets risk, and small sized company risk as a principal risk whereas the Acquiring Portfolio, but not the Target Portfolio, is subject to asset allocation risk, bank loan investments risk, covenant-lite risk, fund of funds risk, and liquidity allocation risk as a principal risk. The Combined Portfolio will be subject to the same risks as the Acquiring Portfolio once the Reorganization is complete. Detailed descriptions of the principal risks associated with the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are set forth in (i) this Prospectus/Proxy Statement under the caption “Comparison of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio—Principal Risks of the Portfolios;” and (ii) the summary prospectus for the Acquiring Portfolio attached as Exhibit B to this Prospectus/Proxy Statement.

There is no guarantee that shares of the Combined Portfolio will not lose value. This means that the value of the Combined Portfolio’s investments, and therefore, the value of the Combined Portfolio’s shares, may fluctuate.

Comparison of Investment Management Fees and Total Fund Operating Expenses

The current effective and contractual investment management fee rates for the Acquiring Portfolio are lower than that for the Target Portfolio; and the effective and the contractual investment management fee rate for the Combined Portfolio are expected to be lower than that of the Target Portfolio after the Reorganization is completed. Contractual investment management fees are the management fees paid to the Manager and do not reflect any waivers or reimbursements. Effective investment management fees are the management fees paid to the Manager that take into account any applicable waiver or reimbursement.

Assuming completion of the Reorganization on December 5, 2022, based on assets under management for each of the Portfolios on that date, the pro forma annualized total net operating expense ratio of the Combined Portfolio is lower than the annualized total net operating expense ratio of the Target Portfolio. The same holds true, assuming completion of the Reorganization on December 5, 2022, based on assets under management for each of the Portfolios on that date. This means that the Target Portfolio shareholders will benefit from a reduced total net operating expense ratio.

The following table describes the fees and expenses that owners of certain annuity contracts (the “Contracts”) may pay if they invest in the Target Portfolio or the Acquiring Portfolio, as well as the projected fees and expenses of the Combined Portfolio after the Reorganization. The following table does not reflect any Contract charges. Because Contract charges are not included, the total fees and expenses that you will incur will be higher than the fees and expenses set forth below. The Contract charges will not change as a result of the Reorganization. See your Contract prospectus for more information about Contract charges.

Shareholder Fees
(fees paid directly from your investment)

	Target Portfolio		Acquiring Portfolio		Combined Portfolio (Pro Forma Surviving)
Maximum sales charge (load) imposed on purchases	NA	*	NA	*	NA	*
Maximum deferred sales charge (load)	NA	*	NA	*	NA	*
Maximum sales charge (load) imposed on reinvested dividends	NA	*	NA	*	NA	*
Redemption Fee	NA	*	NA	*	NA	*
Exchange Fee	NA	*	NA	*	NA	*

* Because shares of both the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are purchased through Contracts, the relevant Contract prospectus should be carefully reviewed for information on the charges and expenses of the Contract. This table does not reflect any such charges; and the expenses shown would be higher if such charges were reflected.

Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses (as of June 30, 2022)
(expenses that are deducted from Portfolio assets)

	Target Portfolio		Acquiring Portfolio		Combined Portfolio (Pro Forma Surviving)
Management Fees	0.75	%	0.61	%	0.61	%
Distribution and/or Service Fees (12b-1 Fees)	0.25	%	0.25	%	0.25	%
Other Expenses	0.02	%	0.02	%	0.01	%
Acquired Fund Fees & Expenses	0.01	%	0.13	%	0.07	%
Total Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses	1.03	%	1.01	%	0.94	%
Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement	-0.05	%⁽¹⁾	-0.14	%⁽²⁾	-0.09	%⁽²⁾
Total Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses After Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement	0.98	%	0.87	%	0.85	%

(1)

The Manager contractually agreed to waive 0.047% of its management fee through June 14, 2022. In addition, effective June 15, 2022, the Manager contractually agreed to waive a portion of its management fee and/or reimburse certain expenses of the Portfolio so that the Portfolio’s management fee plus other expenses (exclusive, in all cases of, brokerage, taxes (such as income and foreign withholding taxes, stamp duty and deferred tax expenses), extraordinary expenses, and certain other Portfolio expenses such as dividend and interest expense and broker charges on short sales) do not exceed 0.89% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets through June 30, 2023. Expenses waived/reimbursed by the Manager may be recouped by the Manager within the same fiscal year during which such waiver/reimbursement is made if such recoupment can be realized without exceeding the expense limit in effect at the time of the recoupment for that fiscal year. These arrangements may not be terminated or modified without the prior approval of the Trust’s Board of Trustees.

(2)

The Manager has contractually agreed to waive 0.02% of its management fee through June 30, 2023. In addition, the Manager has contractually agreed to waive 0.0004% of its management fee through June 30, 2023. The Manager and the Distributor have also contractually agreed to waive a portion of their management fee and distribution fee, respectively, equal to the amount of the management and distribution fee received from other portfolios of the Trust due to the Portfolio’s investment in any such portfolios. In addition, the Manager has contractually agreed to waive a portion of its management fee and/or reimburse certain expenses of the Portfolio so that the Portfolio’s management fee plus other expenses (exclusive, in all cases of, brokerage, taxes (such as income and foreign withholding taxes, stamp duty and deferred tax expenses), extraordinary expenses, and certain other Portfolio expenses such as dividend and interest expense and broker charges on short sales) do not exceed 0.89% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets through June 30, 2023. Expenses waived/reimbursed by the Manager may be recouped by the Manager within the same fiscal year during which such waiver/reimbursement is made if such recoupment can be realized without exceeding the expense limit in effect at the time of the recoupment for that fiscal year. These arrangements may not be terminated or modified without the prior approval of the Trust’s Board of Trustees.

Expense Examples

The examples assume that you invest $10,000 in each of the Portfolios for the time periods indicated. The examples also assume that your investment has a 5% return each year, that each Portfolio’s total operating expenses remain the same, and include the contractual expense cap only for the one-year period for the Target Portfolio, the Acquiring Portfolio and the Combined Portfolio (Pro Forma Surviving). These examples do not reflect any charges or expenses for the Contracts. The expenses shown below would be higher if these charges or expenses were included. Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, based on these assumptions your costs would be:

	One Year		Three Years		Five Years		Ten Years
Target Portfolio⁽¹⁾	$	100	$	323	$	564	$	1,255
Acquiring Portfolio⁽¹⁾	$	89	$	308	$	544	$	1,224
Combined Portfolio (Pro Forma Surviving)⁽¹⁾	$	87	$	291	$	511	$	1,146

(1) Based on total annual operating expense ratios reflected in the summary section of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement entitled “Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses (as of June 30, 2022).”

Portfolio Turnover

The Portfolios pay transaction costs, such as commissions, when each buys and sells securities (or “turns over” its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs. These costs, which are not reflected in annual portfolio operating expenses or in the example, affect a portfolio’s performance. During the most recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the Target Portfolio’s turnover rate was 141% of the average value of its portfolio, and the Acquiring Portfolio’s turnover rate was 83% of the average value of its portfolio.

Reorganization Details and Reasons for the Reorganization

Assuming completion of the Reorganization, shareholders of the Target Portfolio will have their shares exchanged for shares of the Acquiring Portfolio of equal dollar value based upon the value of the shares at the time the Target Portfolio’s assets are transferred to the Acquiring Portfolio and the Target Portfolio’s liabilities are assumed by the Acquiring Portfolio. After the transfer of assets, assumption of liabilities, and exchange of shares have been completed, the Target Portfolio will be liquidated and dissolved. As a result of the Reorganization, you will cease to be a beneficial shareholder of the Target Portfolio and will become a beneficial shareholder of the Acquiring Portfolio.

Both the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio serve as underlying mutual funds for the Contracts issued by “Participating Insurance Companies.” Each Participating Insurance Company holds assets invested in these Contracts in various separate accounts, each of which is divided into sub-accounts investing exclusively in a mutual fund or in a portfolio of a mutual fund. Therefore, Contract owners who have allocated their account values to applicable sub-accounts are indirectly invested in the applicable Portfolio through the Contracts and should consider themselves shareholders of the applicable Portfolio for purposes of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement.

For the reasons set forth in the “Information About the Reorganization—Reasons for the Reorganization” section, the Board has determined that the Reorganization is in the best interests of the shareholders of each of the Portfolios, and has also concluded that no dilution in value would result to the shareholders of either Portfolio as a result of the Reorganization.

The Board of Trustees of the Advanced Series Trust, on behalf of the Target Portfolio, has approved the Plan and unanimously recommends that you vote to approve the Plan.

In deciding whether to vote to approve the Plan, you should consider the information considered by the Board and the information provided in this Prospectus/Proxy Statement.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REORGANIZATION

This section describes the Reorganization for the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio. This section is only a summary of the Plan. You should read the actual Plan attached as Exhibit A.

Reasons for the Reorganization

On June 30, 2022, the Target Portfolio was repositioned, which involved (i) replacing Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC (“AllianzGI”) with PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC, PGIM, Inc., PGIM Limited, and Wellington Management Company LLP, and (ii) revising the investment strategy of the Target Portfolio (the “Repositioning”).

Based on a recommendation of the Manager of the Target Portfolio, the Board, including the Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (collectively, the “Independent Trustees”), unanimously approved the Reorganization. The Manager recommended the Reorganization because AllianzGI would be disqualified from providing advisory services to U.S. registered funds (including the Target Portfolio) after July 26, 2022. The Board also unanimously recommends that the beneficial shareholders of the Target Portfolio approve the Reorganization. The Board also unanimously determined that the Reorganization would be in the best interests of the beneficial shareholders of each of the Portfolios, and that the interests of the shareholders of each of the Portfolios would not be diluted as a result of the Reorganization.

The Reorganization is expected to benefit shareholders for several reasons, including that:

The Combined Portfolio will be larger than the Target Portfolio or the Acquiring Portfolio, with an estimated $12,099 million based on net assets as of June 30, 2022;

The Manager provided, and the Board considered, information regarding any potential adverse impact to shareholders as a result of the Reorganization. In connection with the Reorganization, there will be purchases and sales of securities. These transactions may result in costs, such as brokerage commissions, bid-ask spreads and market impact.

Although some derivatives and similar holdings may be repositioned prior to a Reorganization if they cannot be effectively transferred to the Acquiring Portfolio, the Manager currently expects that all or substantially all of the Target Portfolio’s assets will be transferred in-kind into the Acquiring Portfolio and all or substantially all of the transactions will be made by the Combined Portfolio after to the Reorganization. It is estimated that approximately 12% of the Target Portfolio’s securities will be repositioned. Actual portfolio sales and purchases after the Reorganization will depend on portfolio composition, market conditions and other factors at the time of the Reorganization, and will be at the discretion of the Combined Portfolio’s subadvisers— MFS, J.P. Morgan, Jennison, PGIM Quant, PGIM Fixed Income, PGIM Limited, and Wellington. The extent to which the portfolio securities of the Target Portfolio will be maintained by the Combined Portfolio will be determined consistent with the Combined Portfolio’s investment objective, strategies and policies.

A significant portion of the costs incurred in entering into and carrying out the terms and conditions of the Reorganization, regardless of whether approved by shareholders, including (without limitation) outside legal counsel and independent registered public accounting firm costs and costs incurred in connection with the printing and mailing of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement and related materials, will be paid by AllianzGI or its affiliates. The transaction costs to be paid by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC or its affiliates are expected to be approximately $955,000, which is approximately 0.8 basis points of the Combined Portfolio.

For the reasons discussed above, the Board of Trustees of the Advanced Series Trust unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the Plan.

If shareholders of the Target Portfolio do not approve the Plan, the Board will consider other possible courses of action, including, among others, consolidation of the Target Portfolio with one or more portfolios of the Trust other than the Acquiring Portfolio, or unaffiliated funds, or the liquidation of the Target Portfolio.

Closing of the Reorganization

If shareholders of the Target Portfolio approve the Plan, the Reorganization will take place after various conditions are satisfied by the Trust on behalf of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio, including the preparation of certain documents. The Trust will determine a specific date for the actual Reorganization to take place, which is presently expected to occur on or about December 5, 2022. This is called the “Closing Date.” If the shareholders of the Target Portfolio do not approve the Plan, the Reorganization will not take place for the Target Portfolio, and the Board will consider alternative courses of actions, as described above.

If the shareholders of the Target Portfolio approve the Plan, the Target Portfolio will deliver to the Acquiring Portfolio all of its assets on the Closing Date, the Acquiring Portfolio will assume all of the liabilities of the Target Portfolio on the Closing Date, and the Acquiring Portfolio will issue the Acquiring Portfolio Shares to the Target Portfolio. The Acquiring Portfolio Shares received by the Target Portfolio will have an aggregate net asset value that is equal to the aggregate net asset value of the Target Portfolio shares that are outstanding immediately prior to the Reorganization. The Participating Insurance Companies then will make a conforming exchange of units between the applicable sub-accounts in their separate accounts. As a result, shareholders of the Target Portfolio will beneficially own shares of the Acquiring Portfolio that, as of the date of the exchange, have an aggregate value equal to the dollar value of the assets delivered to the Target Portfolio. The stock transfer books of the Target Portfolio will be permanently closed on the closing date. Requests to transfer or redeem assets allocated to the Target Portfolio may be submitted at any time before the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on the Closing Date, and requests that are received in proper form prior to that time will be effected prior to the closing.

To the extent permitted by law, the Trust may amend the Plan without shareholder approval. The Trust may also agree to terminate and abandon the Reorganization at any time before or, to the extent permitted by law, after the approval by shareholders of the Target Portfolio.

Expenses of the Reorganization

All of the costs incurred in entering into and carrying out the terms and conditions of the Reorganization, regardless of whether approved by shareholders, including (without limitation) outside legal counsel and independent registered public accounting firm costs and costs incurred in connection with the printing and mailing of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement and related materials, will be paid by AllianzGI or its affiliates. The transaction costs to be paid by AllianzGI or its affiliates are expected to be approximately $955,000, which is approximately 0.8 basis points of the Combined Portfolio.

Certain Federal Income Tax Considerations

The Portfolios are treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a Partnership, each Portfolio’s income, gains, losses, deductions, and credits are proportionately distributed to the Participating Insurance Companies and retain the same character for Federal Income tax purposes. Distributions may be made to the various separate accounts of the Participating Insurance Companies in the form of additional shares (not in cash).

Contract owners should consult the prospectuses of their respective Contracts for information on the federal income tax consequences to such owners. In addition, Contract owners may wish to consult with their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of investments in one of the Portfolios, including the application of state and local taxes.

Each of the Portfolios complies with the diversification requirements of Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

The Reorganization may entail various consequences, which are discussed below under the caption “Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reorganization.”

Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reorganization

The following discussion is applicable to the Reorganization. The Reorganization is intended to qualify for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a tax-free transaction under the Code. In addition, assuming that the Contracts qualify for the federal tax-deferred treatment applicable to certain variable insurance products, Contract owners generally should not have any reportable gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes even if the Reorganization did not qualify as a tax-free transaction. It is a condition to each Portfolio’s obligation to complete its Reorganization that the Portfolios will have received an opinion from Goodwin Procter LLP, counsel to the Portfolios, based upon representations made by the Trust on behalf of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio, and upon certain assumptions, substantially to the effect that the transactions contemplated by the Plan should constitute a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

As set forth above, the Portfolios are treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Based on such treatment and certain representations made by the Trust on behalf of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio relating to the Reorganization, for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 721 and 731 of the Code and related Code Sections (references to “shareholders” are to the Participating Insurance Companies):

1. The transfer by the Target Portfolio of all of its assets to the Acquiring Portfolio, in exchange solely for the Acquiring Portfolio Shares, the assumption by the Acquiring Portfolio of all of the liabilities of the Target Portfolio, and the distribution of the Acquiring Portfolio Shares to the shareholders of the Target Portfolio in complete liquidation of the Target Portfolio, should be tax-free to the shareholders of the Target Portfolio.

2. The shareholders of the Target Portfolio should not recognize gain or loss upon the exchange of all of their shares solely for Acquiring Portfolio Shares, as described in this Prospectus/Proxy Statement and the Plan.

3. No gain or loss should be recognized by the Target Portfolio upon the transfer of its assets to the Acquiring Portfolio in exchange solely for Acquiring Portfolio Shares and the assumption by the Acquiring Portfolio of the liabilities, if any, of the Target Portfolio. In addition, no gain or loss should be recognized by the Target Portfolio on the distribution of such Acquiring Portfolio Shares to the shareholders of the Target Portfolio (in liquidation of the Target Portfolio).

4. No gain or loss should be recognized by the Acquiring Portfolio upon the acquisition of the assets of the Target Portfolio in exchange solely for Acquiring Portfolio Shares and the assumption of the liabilities, if any, of the Target Portfolio.

5. The Acquiring Portfolio’s tax basis for the assets acquired from the Target Portfolio should be the same as the tax basis of these assets when held by the Target Portfolio immediately before the transfer, and the holding period of such assets acquired by the Acquiring Portfolio should include the holding period of such assets when held by the Target Portfolio.

6. The Target Portfolio shareholder’s tax basis for the Acquiring Portfolio Shares to be received by the shareholders pursuant to the Reorganization should be the same as its tax basis in the Target Portfolio shares exchanged therefore reduced or increased by any net decrease or increase, as the case may be, in such shareholder’s share of the liabilities of the Portfolios as a result of the Reorganization.

7. The holding period of the Acquiring Portfolio Shares to be received by the shareholders of the Target Portfolio should include the holding period of their Target Portfolio shares exchanged therefor, provided such shares were held as capital assets on the date of exchange.

An opinion of counsel is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or the courts. Shareholders of the Target Portfolio should consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences to them of the Reorganization in light of their individual circumstances.

A Contract owner should consult the prospectus for his or her Contract on the federal tax consequences of owning the Contract. Contract owners should also consult their tax advisors as to state and local tax consequences, if any, of the Reorganization, because this discussion only relates to U.S. federal income tax consequences.

Characteristics of Acquiring Portfolio Shares

The Acquiring Portfolio Shares to be distributed to Target Portfolio shareholders will have substantially identical legal characteristics as shares of beneficial interest of the Target Portfolio with respect to such matters as voting rights, accessibility, conversion rights, and transferability.

The Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are each organized as a series of a Massachusetts business trust. There are no material differences between the rights of shareholders of the Portfolios.

COMPARISON OF THE TARGET PORTFOLIO, THE ACQUIRING PORTFOLIO, AND THE COMBINED PORTFOLIO

Additional information regarding the Acquiring Portfolio’s investments and risks, the management of the Acquiring Portfolio, the purchase and sale of Acquiring Portfolio shares, annual portfolio operating expenses, certain U.S. federal income tax considerations, and financial intermediary compensation is set forth in Exhibit B to this Prospectus/Proxy Statement.

Analysis of Investment Objectives and Principal Investment Strategies of the Portfolios

The investment objectives of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are the same. The investment objective of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio is to obtain the highest potential total return consistent with each Portfolio’s specified level of risk tolerance. The investment objectives of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are non-fundamental, meaning that they can be changed by the Board without shareholder approval.

As explained above, as of the effective date of the Reorganization, the Combined Portfolio will be managed by the Acquiring Portfolio’s subadvisers in according to the investment objective and principal investment strategies of the Acquiring Portfolio.

	Target Portfolio	Acquiring Portfolio	Combined Portfolio
Investment Objective:	The investment objective of the Target Portfolio is to obtain the highest potential total return consistent with its specified level of risk tolerance.	The investment objective of the Acquiring Portfolio is to obtain the highest potential total return consistent with its specified level of risk tolerance.	The investment objective of the Combined Portfolio is to obtain the highest potential total return consistent with its specified level of risk tolerance.

Principal Investment Strategies:	The Target Portfolio’s asset allocation generally provides for an allotment of approximately 60% of Target Portfolio assets to a combination of domestic and international equity strategies and an allotment of approximately 40% of Target Portfolio assets to a combination of US fixed income and global hedged bond investment strategies. The asset allocation strategy is determined by the Manager and PGIM Quant, the subadviser to the Target Portfolio.	The Acquiring Portfolio’s asset allocation generally provides for an allotment of approximately 60% of Acquiring Portfolio assets to a combination of domestic and international equity strategies and an allotment of approximately 40% of Acquiring Portfolio assets to a combination of US fixed income, global hedged bond, and emerging market bond investment strategies. The asset allocation strategy is determined by the Manager and PGIM Quant, the subadviser to the Acquiring Portfolio.	The Combined Portfolio’s asset allocation generally provides for an allotment of approximately 60% of Combined Portfolio assets to a combination of domestic and international equity strategies and an allotment of approximately 40% of Combined Portfolio assets to a combination of US fixed income, global hedged bond, and emerging market bond investment strategies. The asset allocation strategy is determined by the Manager and PGIM Quant, the subadviser to the Combined Portfolio.

Target Portfolio

Acquiring Portfolio

Combined Portfolio

As a general matter, PGIM Quant begins by constructing a neutral allocation for the Target Portfolio. Each neutral allocation initially divides the assets for the Target Portfolio across three broad-based securities benchmark indexes. These benchmark indexes are the S&P 500 Index, the MSCI ACWI Index, and the Bloomberg US Aggregate Index. The neutral allocation will emphasize investments in the equity asset class. The selection of specific combinations of Underlying Portfolios for the Target Portfolio generally will be determined by the Manager. The Manager will employ various quantitative and qualitative research methods to establish weighted combinations of Underlying Portfolios that are consistent with the neutral allocation for the Target Portfolio.

As a general matter, PGIM Quant begins by constructing a neutral allocation for the Acquiring Portfolio. Each neutral allocation initially divides the assets for the Acquiring Portfolio across three broad-based securities benchmark indexes. These three benchmark indexes are the Russell 3000 Index, the MSCI Europe, Australasia and the Far East (EAFE) Index, and the Bloomberg US Aggregate Index. The neutral allocation will emphasize investments in the equity asset class. The selection of specific combinations of Underlying Portfolios for the Acquiring Portfolio generally will be determined by the Manager. The Manager will employ various quantitative and qualitative research methods to establish weighted combinations of Underlying Portfolios that are consistent with the neutral allocation for the Acquiring Portfolio.

As a general matter, PGIM Quant begins by constructing a neutral allocation for the Combined Portfolio. Each neutral allocation initially divides the assets for the Combined Portfolio across three broad-based securities benchmark indexes. These three benchmark indexes are the Russell 3000 Index, the MSCI Europe, Australasia and the Far East (EAFE) Index, and the Bloomberg US Aggregate Index. The neutral allocation will emphasize investments in the equity asset class. The selection of specific combinations of Underlying Portfolios for the Combined Portfolio generally will be determined by the Manager. The Manager will employ various quantitative and qualitative research methods to establish weighted combinations of Underlying Portfolios that are consistent with the neutral allocation for the Combined Portfolio.

Target Portfolio

Acquiring Portfolio

Combined Portfolio

PGIM Quant will then perform its own forward-looking assessment of macroeconomic, market, financial, security valuation, and other factors. As a result of this assessment, PGIM Quant Solutions will further adjust the neutral allocation and the preliminary Underlying Portfolio weights for the Target Portfolio based upon its views on certain factors Included in the directly managed portion is an overlay strategy managed by PGIM Quant for liquidity and asset allocation purposes. The Target Portfolio allocates approximately 15-25% of its net assets to the overlay strategy, which is employed through an overlay sleeve. The overlay strategy seeks to allow for the efficient management of Portfolio-level risk and changes in the Target Portfolio’s asset levels, liquidity, and asset allocations. The overlay strategy is also used to access and adjust exposures to various asset classes and underlying strategy allocations. The overlay strategy is invested primarily in (i) derivative instruments including, but not limited to, swaps, forwards, index futures, other futures contracts, and options thereon to provide liquid exposure to the applicable equity and fixed income benchmark indices; and (ii) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements for the futures contracts and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large-scale redemptions. The overlay strategy may also invest in ETFs for additional exposure to relevant markets. The overlay strategy may temporarily deviate from the allocation indicated due to redemptions in the Target Portfolio or other circumstances relevant to the Target Portfolio’s overall investment process.

Included in the directly managed portion is an overlay strategy managed by PGIM Quant for liquidity and asset allocation purposes. The Acquiring Portfolio allocates approximately 15-25% of its net assets to the overlay strategy, which is employed through an overlay sleeve. The overlay strategy seeks to allow for the efficient management of Portfolio-level risk and changes in the Acquiring Portfolio’s asset levels, liquidity, and asset allocations. The overlay strategy is also used to access and adjust exposures to various asset classes and underlying strategy allocations. The overlay strategy is invested primarily in (i) derivative instruments including, but not limited to, swaps, forwards, index futures, other futures contracts, and options thereon to provide liquid exposure to the applicable equity and fixed income benchmark indices; and (ii) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements for the futures contracts and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large-scale redemptions.

The overlay strategy may also invest in ETFs for additional exposure to relevant markets. The overlay strategy may temporarily deviate from the allocation indicated due to redemptions in the Acquiring Portfolio or other circumstances relevant to the Acquiring Portfolio’s overall investment process.

Included in the directly managed portion is an overlay strategy managed by PGIM Quant for liquidity and asset allocation purposes. The Combined Portfolio allocates approximately 15-25% of its net assets to the overlay strategy, which is employed through an overlay sleeve. The overlay strategy seeks to allow for the efficient management of Portfolio-level risk and changes in the Combined Portfolio’s asset levels, liquidity, and asset allocations. The overlay strategy is also used to access and adjust exposures to various asset classes and underlying strategy allocations. The overlay strategy is invested primarily in (i) derivative instruments including, but not limited to, swaps, forwards, index futures, other futures contracts, and options thereon to provide liquid exposure to the applicable equity and fixed income benchmark indices; and (ii) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements for the futures contracts and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large-scale redemptions.

The overlay strategy may also invest in ETFs for additional exposure to relevant markets. The overlay strategy may temporarily deviate from the allocation indicated due to redemptions in the Combined Portfolio or other circumstances relevant to the Combined Portfolio’s overall investment process.

Principal Risks of the Portfolios

The table below compares the principal risks of investing in the Portfolios. All investments have risks to some degree, and it is possible that you could lose money by investing in each of the Portfolios. As previously noted, the Target Portfolio, the Acquiring Portfolio, and the Combined Portfolio have similar investment objectives and substantially similar principal investment strategies. An investment in the Target Portfolio involves substantially similar risks as an investment in the Acquiring Portfolio or the Combined Portfolio, as noted below. An investment in each of the Portfolios is not a deposit with a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. While each of the Portfolios makes every effort to achieve its objective, it can’t guarantee success.

Principal Risks		Target Portfolio		Acquiring Portfolio		Combined Portfolio
Asset Allocation Risk. The Portfolio’s overall allocations to stocks and bonds, and the allocations to the various asset classes and market sectors within those broad categories, could cause the Portfolio to underperform other funds with a similar investment objective. As a fund that has a larger allocation to equity securities relative to its fixed income allocation, the Portfolio risk of loss and share price fluctuation (and potential for gain) will tend to be more closely aligned with funds investing a greater portion of assets in equity securities and notably more than funds investing primarily in fixed income securities. Additionally, both equity and fixed income securities may decline in value. Any given investment strategy may fail to produce the intended results, and a Fund’s portfolio may underperform other comparable funds because of portfolio management decisions related to, among other things, the selection of investments, portfolio construction, risk assessments, and/or the outlook on market trends and opportunities.		No		Yes		Yes

Principal Risks

Target
Portfolio

Acquiring
Portfolio

Combined
Portfolio

Asset-Backed and/or Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk. Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities are fixed income securities that represent an interest in an underlying pool of assets, such as credit card receivables or, in the case of mortgage-backed securities, mortgage loans. Like fixed income securities, asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities are subject to interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and credit risk, which may be heightened in connection with investments in loans to “subprime” borrowers. Certain asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities are subject to the risk that those obligations will be repaid sooner than expected or later than expected, either of which may result in lower-than-expected returns. Mortgage-backed securities, because they are backed by mortgage loans, are also subject to risks related to real estate, and securities backed by private-issued mortgages may experience higher rates of default on the underlying mortgages than securities backed by government-issued mortgages.

Yes

Asset Transfer Program Risk. Predetermined, nondiscretionary mathematical formulas used by the Participating Insurance Companies to manage the guarantees offered in connection with certain benefit programs under the Contracts may result in systematic transfers of assets among the investment options under the Contracts, including the Portfolio. These formulas may result in large-scale asset flows into and out of the Portfolio, which could adversely affect the Portfolio, including its risk profile, expenses and performance. For example, the asset flows may adversely affect performance by requiring the Portfolio to purchase or sell securities at inopportune times, by otherwise limiting the subadviser’s ability to fully implement the Portfolio’s investment strategies, or by requiring the Portfolio to hold a larger portion of its assets in highly liquid securities than it otherwise would hold. The asset flows may also result in high turnover, low asset levels and high operating expense ratios for the Portfolio. The asset flows could remove all or substantially all of the assets of the Portfolio. The efficient operation of the asset flows depends on active and liquid markets. If market liquidity is strained, the asset flows may not operate as intended which in turn could adversely affect performance.

Yes

Principal Risks	Target Portfolio	Acquiring Portfolio	Combined Portfolio
Bank Loan Investments Risk. The Portfolio’s ability to receive payments of principal and interest and other amounts in connection with loans (whether through participations, assignments or otherwise) will depend primarily on the financial condition of the borrower. The failure by the Portfolio to receive scheduled interest or principal payments on a loan because of a default, bankruptcy or any other reason would adversely affect the income of the Portfolio and would likely reduce the value of its assets. Even with loans secured by collateral, there is the risk that the value of the collateral may decline, may be insufficient to meet the obligations of the borrower, or be difficult to liquidate. In the event of a default, the Portfolio may have difficulty collecting on any collateral and would not have the ability to collect on any collateral for an uncollateralized loan. Further, the Portfolio’s access to collateral, if any, may be limited by bankruptcy laws. In addition, loan participations generally are subject to restrictions on transfer, and only limited opportunities may exist to sell loan participations in secondary markets. As a result, it may be difficult for the Portfolio to value loans or sell loans at an acceptable price when it wants to sell them. Loans trade in an over-the-counter market, and confirmation and settlement, which are effected through standardized procedures and documentation, may take significantly longer than seven days to complete. To the extent the Portfolio invests in loans of non-U.S. issuers, the risks of investing in non-U.S. issuers are applicable. Loans may not be considered to be “securities” and as a result may not benefit from the protections of the federal securities laws, including anti-fraud protections and those with respect to the use of material non-public information, so that purchasers, such as the Portfolio, may not have the benefit of these protections.	No	Yes	Yes

Blend Style Risk. The Portfolio’s blend investment style may subject the Portfolio to risks of both value and growth investing. The portion of the Portfolio’s portfolio that makes investments pursuant to a growth strategy may be subject to above-average fluctuations as a result of seeking high-quality stocks with good future growth prospects. The portion of the Portfolio’s portfolio that makes investments pursuant to a value strategy may be subject to the risk that the market may not recognize a security’s intrinsic value for long periods of time or that a stock judged to be undervalued may actually be appropriately priced. Issuers of value stocks may have experienced adverse business developments or may be subject to special risks that have caused the stock to be out of favor. If the Portfolio’s assessment of market conditions or a company’s value is inaccurate, the Portfolio could suffer losses or produce poor performance relative to other funds. Historically, growth stocks have performed best during later stages of economic expansion and value stocks have performed best during periods of economic recovery. Therefore, both styles may over time go in and out of favor with the markets. At times when a style is out of favor, that portion of the portfolio may lag the other portion of the portfolio, which may cause the overall Portfolio to underperform the market in general, its benchmark and other mutual funds. Growth and value stocks have historically produced similar long-term results, though each category has periods when it outperforms the other.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Principal Risks	Target Portfolio	Acquiring Portfolio	Combined Portfolio
Commodity Risk. The value of a commodity-linked investment is affected by, among other things, overall market movements, factors affecting a particular industry or commodity, and changes in interest and exchange rates and may be more volatile than traditional equity and debt securities.	Yes	No	No

Covenant-Lite Risk. Some of the loans or debt obligations in which the Portfolio may invest or get exposure to may be “covenant-lite”, which means the loans or obligations contain fewer financial maintenance covenants than other loans or obligations (in some cases, none) and do not include terms which allow the lender to monitor the borrower’s performance and declare a default if certain criteria are breached. An investment by the Portfolio in a covenant-lite loan may potentially hinder the ability to reprice credit risk associated with the issuer and reduce the ability to restructure a problematic loan and mitigate potential loss. The Portfolio may also experience difficulty, expenses or delays in enforcing its rights on its holdings of covenant-lite loans or obligations. As a result of these risks, the Portfolio’s exposure to losses may be increased, which could result in an adverse impact on the Portfolio’s net income and NAV.	No	Yes	Yes

Derivatives Risk. A derivative is a financial contract, the value of which depends upon, or is derived from, the value of one or more underlying investments, such as an asset, reference rate, or index. The use of derivatives is a highly specialized activity that involves a variety of risks in addition to and greater than those associated with investing directly in securities, including the risk that: the party on the other side of a derivative transaction will be unable to honor its financial obligation; leverage created by investing in derivatives may result in losses to the Portfolio; derivatives may be difficult or impossible for the Portfolio to buy or sell at an opportune time or price, and may be difficult to terminate or otherwise offset; derivatives used for hedging may reduce or magnify losses but also may reduce or eliminate gains; and the price of commodity-linked derivatives may be more volatile than the prices of traditional equity and debt securities.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Economic and Market Events Risk. Events in the US and global financial markets, including actions taken by the US Federal Reserve or foreign central banks to stimulate or stabilize economic growth, may at times result in periods of unusually high volatility in a market or a segment of a market, which could negatively impact performance. Reduced liquidity in credit and fixed income markets could adversely affect issuers worldwide.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Principal Risks	Target Portfolio	Acquiring Portfolio	Combined Portfolio
Emerging Markets Risk. The risks of non-US investments are greater for investments in or exposed to emerging markets. Emerging market countries typically have economic, political and social systems that are less developed, and can be expected to be less stable, than those of more developed countries. As a result, there could be less information available about issuers in emerging market countries, which could negatively affect the ability of the Manager or a Portfolio’s Subadviser(s) to evaluate local companies or their potential impact on a Portfolio’s performance. For example, the economies of such countries can be subject to currency devaluations and rapid and unpredictable (and in some cases, extremely high) rates of inflation or deflation. Low trading volumes may result in a lack of liquidity, price volatility and valuation difficulties. Regulatory regimes outside of the US may not require or enforce corporate governance standards comparable to that of the US, which may result in less protections for investors in such issuers and make such issuers more susceptible to actions not in the best interest of the issuer or its investors. Emerging market countries may have policies that restrict investments by foreign investors, or that prevent foreign investors from withdrawing their money at will, which may make it difficult for a Portfolio to invest in such countries or increase the administrative costs of such investments. Countries with emerging markets can be found in regions such as Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and Africa. A Portfolio may invest in some emerging markets through trading structures or protocols that subject it to risks such as those associated with decreased liquidity, custody of assets, different settlement and clearance procedures and asserting legal title under a developing legal and regulatory regime to a greater degree than in developed markets or even in other emerging markets.	Yes	No	No

Equity Securities Risk. The value of a particular stock or equity-related security held by the Portfolio could fluctuate, perhaps greatly, in response to a number of factors, such as changes in the issuer’s financial condition or the value of the equity markets or a sector of those markets. Such events may result in losses to the Portfolio. In addition, due to decreases in liquidity, the Portfolio may be unable to sell its securities holdings within a reasonable time at the price it values the security or at any price.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETF) Risk. An investment in an ETF generally presents the same primary risks as an investment in a mutual fund that has the same investment objective, strategies and policies. In addition, the market price of an ETF’s shares may trade above or below its net asset value and there may not be an active trading market for an ETF’s shares. The Portfolio could lose money investing in an ETF if the prices of the securities owned by the ETF go down.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Expense Risk. The actual cost of investing in the Portfolio may be higher than the expenses shown in the “Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses” table above for a variety of reasons, including, for example, if the Portfolio’s average net assets decrease.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Principal Risks	Target Portfolio	Acquiring Portfolio	Combined Portfolio
Fixed Income Securities Risk. Investment in fixed income securities involves a variety of risks, including that: an issuer or guarantor of a security will be unable or unwilling to pay obligations when due; due to decreases in liquidity, the Portfolio may be unable to sell its securities holdings within a reasonable time at the price it values the security or at any price; and the Portfolio’s investment may decrease in value when interest rates rise. Volatility in interest rates and in fixed income markets may increase the risk that the Portfolio’s investment in fixed income securities will go down in value. Risks associated with changing interest rates are currently heightened because any increase or decrease may be sudden and significant, with unpredictable effects on the markets and the Portfolio’s investments. Changes in interest rates may also affect the liquidity of the Portfolio’s investments in fixed income securities.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Foreign Investment Risk. Investments in foreign securities generally involve more risk than investments in securities of US issuers, including: changes in currency exchange rates may affect the value of foreign securities held by the Portfolio; foreign markets generally are more volatile than, and generally are not subject to regulatory requirements comparable to, US markets; foreign financial reporting standards usually differ from those in the US; foreign exchanges are often less liquid than US markets; political or social developments may adversely affect the value of foreign securities; foreign holdings may be subject to special taxation and limitations on repatriating investment proceeds; and certain events in foreign markets may adversely affect foreign and domestic issuers, including military conflict (including Russia’s military invasion in Ukraine), geopolitical developments (including trading and tariff arrangements, sanctions and cybersecurity attacks), interruptions in the global supply chain, natural disasters and outbreaks of infectious diseases.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Fund of Funds Risk. In addition to the risks associated with the investment in the Underlying Portfolios, the Portfolio is exposed to the investment objectives, investment risks, and investment performance of the Underlying Portfolios. The Portfolio is also subject to a potential conflict of interest between the Portfolio and its investment manager(s) and subadviser(s), which could impact the Portfolio. Moreover, the Portfolio will incur its pro rata share of the Underlying Portfolios’ expenses, which will reduce the Portfolio’s performance.	No	Yes	Yes

High Yield Risk. Investments in fixed income securities rated below investment grade and unrated securities of similar credit quality (i.e., high yield securities or junk bonds) may be more sensitive to interest rate, credit, call and liquidity risks than investments in investment grade securities, and have predominantly speculative characteristics.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Liquidity Allocation Risk. The Portfolio’s liquidity strategy will result in a decrease in the amount of the Portfolio’s assets held in individual securities and an increase in the amount invested in derivatives (e.g., futures and options) and in short-term money market instruments. Under certain market conditions, performance may be adversely affected as a result of this strategy.	No	Yes	Yes

Principal Risks	Target Portfolio	Acquiring Portfolio	Combined Portfolio
Liquidity and Valuation Risk. The Portfolio may hold one or more securities for which there are no or few buyers and sellers or the securities are subject to limitations on transfer. The Portfolio may be unable to sell those portfolio holdings at the desired time or price, and may have difficulty determining the value of such securities for the purpose of determining the Portfolio’s net asset value. In such cases, investments owned by the Portfolio may be valued at fair value pursuant to guidelines established by the Trust’s Board of Trustees. No assurance can be given that the fair value prices accurately reflect the value of the security. The Portfolio is subject to a liquidity risk management program, which limits the ability of the Portfolio to invest in illiquid investments.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Market and Management Risk. Markets in which the Portfolio invests may experience volatility and go down in value, and possibly sharply and unpredictably. Investment techniques, risk analyses and investment strategies, which may include quantitative models or methods, used by a subadviser in making investment decisions for the Portfolio are subject to human error and may not produce the intended or desired results. The value of the Portfolio’s investments may be negatively affected by the occurrence of domestic or global events, including war, terrorism, environmental disasters, natural disasters or events, political or civil instability, and public health emergencies (such as the spread of infectious diseases, pandemics, or epidemics), among others. Such events may reduce consumer demand or economic output, result in market closures, travel restrictions or quarantines, and significantly adversely impact the economy. There is no guarantee that the investment objective of the Portfolio will be achieved.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Regulatory Risk. The Portfolio is subject to a variety of laws and regulations which govern its operations. The Portfolio is subject to regulation by the SEC, and depending on the Portfolio, the CFTC. Similarly, the businesses and other issuers of the securities and other instruments in which the Portfolio invests are also subject to considerable regulation. Changes in laws and regulations may materially impact the Portfolio, a security, business, sector or market.	Yes	Yes	Yes

Small Sized Company Risk. Securities of small sized companies tend to be less liquid than those of larger, more established companies, which can have an adverse effect on the price of these securities and on the Portfolio’s ability to sell these securities. The market price of such investments also may rise more in response to buying demand and fall more in response to selling pressure and be more volatile than investments in larger companies.	Yes	No	No

Performance of Target Portfolio

A number of factors, including risk, can affect how the Target Portfolio performs. The information below provides some indication of the risks of investing in the Target Portfolio by showing changes in its performance from year to year, and by showing how its average annual returns over various time periods compare with those of a broad measure of market performance. Past performance does not mean that the Target Portfolio will achieve similar results in the future.

The annual returns and average annual returns shown in the chart and tables are after deduction of expenses and do not include Contract charges. If Contract charges were included, the returns shown would have been lower than those shown. Consult your Contract prospectus for information about Contract charges.

Annual Returns (as of December 31)

2012	10.28	%
2013	12.44	%
2014	5.14	%
2015	-0.17	%
2016	4.81	%
2017	16.23	%
2018	-7.90	%
2019	18.05	%
2020	14.10	%
2021	11.15	%

BEST QUARTER: 13.47% (2^nd Quarter 2020) WORST QUARTER: -13.03% (1^st Quarter 2020)

Average Annual Total Returns (as of June 30, 2022)

	1 YEAR			5 YEARS			10 YEARS
Target Portfolio		-15.63	%		4.07	%		5.52	%
S&P 500 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes)		10.62	%		11.30	%		12.95	%
Blended Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes)		12.34	%		5.79	%		6.99	%

Average Annual Total Returns (as of December 31, 2021)

	1 YEAR			5 YEARS			10 YEARS
Target Portfolio		11.15	%		9.89	%		8.14	%
S&P 500 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes)		28.70	%		18.47	%		16.54	%
Blended Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes)		12.03	%		11.17	%		9.46	%

Performance of Acquiring Portfolio

A number of factors, including risk, can affect how the Acquiring Portfolio performs. The information below provides some indication of the risks of investing in the Acquiring Portfolio by showing changes in its performance from year to year, and by showing how its average annual returns over various time periods compare with those of a broad measure of market performance. Past performance does not mean that the Acquiring Portfolio will achieve similar results in the future.

Annual Returns (as of December 31)

2012	12.48	%
2013	17.65	%
2014	6.52	%
2015	0.48	%
2016	6.30	%
2017	14.90	%
2018	-4.93	%
2019	19.42	%
2020	11.77	%
2021	12.84	%

BEST QUARTER: 13.50% (2^nd Quarter 2020) WORST QUARTER: -14.26% (1^st Quarter 2020)

Average Annual Total Returns (as of June 30, 2022)

	1 YEAR			5 YEARS			10 YEARS
Acquiring Portfolio		-12.73	%		5.06	%		6.90	%
S&P 500 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes)		-10.62	%		11.30	%		12.95	%
Blended Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes)		-12.65	%		6.04	%		7.51	%

Average Annual Total Returns (as of December 31)

	1 YEAR			5 YEARS			10 YEARS
Acquiring Portfolio		12.84	%		10.47	%		9.49	%
S&P 500 Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes)		28.70	%		18.47	%		16.54	%
Blended Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes)		12.60	%		11.43	%		10.12	%

Capitalizations of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio Before and After Reorganization

The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2022: (i) the capitalization of the Target Portfolio, (ii) the capitalization of the Acquiring Portfolio, and (iii) the capitalization of the Combined Portfolio as adjusted to give effect to the Reorganization.

	Target Portfolio (unaudited)		Acquiring Portfolio (unaudited)		Adjustments			Combined Portfolio (Pro Forma Surviving) (unaudited)
Net assets	$	3,530,347,603	$	8,570,413,336				$	12,100,760,939
Total shares outstanding		212,284,528		397,999,242		(48,311,114	)		561,972,656
Net asset value per share	$	16.63	$	21.53				$	21.53

MANAGEMENT OF THE TARGET PORTFOLIO, THE ACQUIRING PORTFOLIO, AND THE COMBINED PORTFOLIO

This section provides more information about: (i) PGIM Investments and ASTIS, (ii) PGIM Quant, PGIM Fixed Income, PGIM Limited, and Wellington as subadvisers to the Target Portfolio, and (iii) MFS, J.P. Morgan, Jennison, PGIM Quant, PGIM Fixed Income, PGIM Limited, and Wellington as subadvisers to the Acquiring Portfolio and the Combined Portfolio.

Investment Management Arrangements

The Portfolios are managed by PGIM Investments, 655 Broad Street, Newark, NJ 07102, and ASTIS, One Corporate Drive, Shelton, Connecticut 06484. As previously noted, the term Manager is used to refer to both PGIM Investments and ASTIS.

As of June 30, 2022, PGIM Investments served as the investment manager to all of the Prudential U.S. and offshore open-end investment companies, and as administrator to closed-end investment companies, with aggregate assets of approximately $131.3 trillion. PGIM Investments is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PIFM Holdco, LLC, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PGIM Holding Company, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc. (“Prudential”). PGIM Investments has been in the business of providing advisory services since 1996.

As of June 30, 2022, ASTIS served as investment manager to certain Prudential U.S. and offshore open-end investment companies with aggregate assets of approximately $122.8 trillion. ASTIS is a subsidiary of Prudential Annuities Holding Company, Inc., which is a subsidiary of Prudential Annuities, Inc., a subsidiary of Prudential. ASTIS has been in the business of providing advisory services since 1992.

The Investment Management Agreements between the Manager and the Trust on behalf of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio (the “Management Agreements”), provide that the Manager will furnish the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio with investment advice and administrative services subject to the oversight of the Board and in conformity with the stated principal investment strategies of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio. The Manager must also provide, or obtain and supervise, the executive, administrative, accounting, custody, transfer agent, and shareholder servicing services that are deemed advisable by the Trustees.

The Trust uses a “manager-of-managers” structure. That means that the Manager has engaged the subadvisers to conduct the investment programs of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio, including the purchase, retention and sale of portfolio securities and other financial instruments. The Manager is responsible for monitoring the activities of the subadvisers and reporting on such activities to the Trustees. The Trust has obtained an exemptive order from the SEC that permits the Manager, subject to approval by the Board, to hire or change subadvisers for the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio by entering into new subadvisory agreements with affiliated and non-affiliated subadvisers, without obtaining shareholder approval of such changes. This exemptive order (which is similar to exemptive orders granted to other investment companies that are organized in a manner similar to the Trust) is intended to facilitate the efficient supervision and management of the subadvisers by the Manager and the Trustees.

If there is more than one subadviser for the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio, the Manager will normally determine the division of the assets for each of the Portfolios among the applicable subadvisers. All daily cash inflows (that is, purchases and reinvested distributions) and outflows (that is, redemptions and expense items) will be divided among such subadvisers as the Manager deems appropriate. The Manager may, in its discretion, change the target allocation of assets among subadvisers, transfer assets between subadvisers, or change the allocation of cash inflows or cash outflows among subadvisers for any reason and at any time without notice. As a consequence, the Manager may allocate assets or cash flows from a portfolio segment that has appreciated more to another portfolio segment.

Reallocations of assets among the subadvisers and the Manager may result in additional costs since sales of securities may result in higher portfolio turnover. Also, because the subadvisers and the Manager select portfolio securities independently, it is possible that a security held by a portfolio segment may also be held by another portfolio segment of the Target Portfolio or the Acquiring Portfolio or that certain subadvisers or the Manager may simultaneously favor the same industry. The Manager will monitor the overall portfolio to ensure that any such overlaps do not create an unintended industry concentration. In addition, if a subadviser buys a security as another subadviser or the Manager sells it, the net position of the Target Portfolio or the Acquiring Portfolio in the security may be approximately the same as it would have been with a single portfolio and no such sale and purchase, but the Target Portfolio or the Acquiring Portfolio will have incurred additional costs. The Manager will consider these costs in determining the allocation of assets or cash flows. The Manager will consider the timing of asset and cash flow reallocations based upon the best interests of each of the Portfolios and its shareholders.

A discussion regarding the basis for the Board’s approvals of the Management Agreements and the subadvisory agreements are available in the semi-annual reports (for agreements approved during the six-month period ended June 30) and in the annual reports (for agreements approved during the six-month period ended December 31).

Subadvisers of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio. The Target Portfolio is subadvised by PGIM Quant, PGIM Fixed Income, PGIM Limited, and Wellington. The Acquiring Portfolio is subadvised by MFS, J.P. Morgan, Jennison, PGIM Quant, PGIM Fixed Income, PGIM Limited, and Wellington. The SAI provides additional information about the portfolio managers responsible for the day-to-day management of each of the Portfolios, the portfolio managers’ compensation, other accounts that each portfolio manager manages, and ownership of portfolio securities by each portfolio manager. If the Reorganization is approved, the Combined Portfolio will be managed by MFS, J.P. Morgan, Jennison, PGIM Quant, PGIM Fixed Income, PGIM Limited, and Wellington.

Descriptions of the subadvisers and the portfolio managers are set forth below:

Target Portfolio, Acquiring Portfolio, and Combined Portfolio

PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC (“PGIM Quant”) is a registered investment adviser, is a wholly-owned and independently-operated subsidiary of PGIM, the global investment management businesses of Prudential Financial, Inc. PGIM Quant began managing multi-asset portfolios for institutional investors in 1975. As of June 30, 2022, PGIM Quant managed approximately $37.9 billion in quantitative equity and global multi-asset solutions for a global client base of pension funds, endowments, foundations, sovereign wealth funds and subadvisory accounts. With offices in Newark, San Francisco and London, PGIM Quant primary address is Gateway Center Two, 100 Mulberry Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102.

The portfolio managers from PGIM Quant who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Portfolios are Edward L. Campbell, CFA, Rory Cummings, CFA, Marco Aiolfi, PhD, Devang Cambhirwala, Wen Jin, PhD, CFA, Joel Kallman, CFA, Edward J. Lithgow, CFA, Edward Louie, Stacie L. Mintz, CFA, and Vladik Shutoy, and Lorne Johnson, PhD.

Edward L. Campbell, CFA, is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager for PGIM Quant working within the Global Multi-Asset Solutions team. As the Director of Dynamic Asset Allocation, he is responsible for portfolio management, analysis, and economic and market valuation research, and he oversees a team of investment professionals. Ed also represents the firm through appearances in major media outlets, most notably as a regular guest on CNBC’s Squawk Box. Prior to joining PGIM Quant, Ed served as a Portfolio Manager and Senior Analyst for PGIM Investments’ Strategic Investment Research Group (SIRG). Previously, Ed was a Partner and Vice President at Trilogy Advisors. He earned a BS in economics and international business from The City University of New York and an MBA in finance, global business and organizational leadership from the New York University Stern School of Business.

Rory Cummings, CFA, is a Principal and Portfolio Manager for PGIM Quant working within the Global Multi-Asset Solutions team. In this capacity, he is responsible for portfolio management, analysis, and economic and market valuation research. Prior to his current role, Rory served as a Client Relations Specialist covering a variety of institutional clients. He earned a BA in finance from Seton Hall University and an MBA in financial markets and corporate finance from the New York University Stern School of Business.

Marco Aiolfi, PhD, is a Managing Director and Co-Head of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ Multi-Asset team. In this capacity, he spearheads the group’s strategic initiatives and is responsible for portfolio management and product development of the multi-asset platform. Prior to his current role, Marco was the Head of Systematic Multi-Asset Strategies, overseeing research, development and portfolio management of systematic total and absolute return investment solutions. Before joining PGIM Quantitative Solutions, Marco was a Lead Portfolio Manager and Researcher for GTAA and volatility strategies for the Quantitative Investment Strategies team at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, and a Principal at Platinum Grove Asset Management. Previously, Marco was a research scholar at the University of California, San Diego, and a visiting scholar at the International Monetary Fund. Marco’s articles have appeared in several journals including the Journal of Econometrics, Journal of Financial Econometrics, Journal of Development Economics, Journal of Forecasting, Journal of Investment Management and the Journal of Portfolio Management. He earned a BA in economics and a PhD in economics from Bocconi University in Italy.

Devang Gambhirwala is a Principal and Portfolio Manager for PGIM Quantitative Solutions working within the Quantitative Equity team. In this capacity, he is responsible for portfolio management, analysis and research. Prior to joining PGIM Quantitative Solutions, Devang worked as a Quantitative Research Analyst and Assistant Portfolio Manager for PGIM, Inc. He earned a BS in computer and information sciences from the New Jersey Institute of Technology and an MBA from Rutgers University.

Wen Jin, PhD, CFA, is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager for PGIM Quant working within the Quantitative Equity team. In this capacity, he is responsible for portfolio management, analysis and research. Prior to joining PGIM Quant, Wen was a Portfolio Manager and the Head of Quantitative Strategy and Trading at Aristeia Capital Management, where he oversaw derivatives valuation, quantitative trading strategy development and portfolio management. Previously, Wen was a Senior Quantitative Strategist in the options trading group at Citadel Investment Group, where he was responsible for the development of equity option arbitrage and volatility arbitrage strategies. Wen’s articles have appeared in the Journal of Accounting Research and Wall Street Horizon, among other leading publications. He earned a BS in physics from University of Sciences and Technology of China, and an MA and PhD in physics from Columbia University.

Joel M. Kallman, CFA, is a Vice President and Portfolio Manager for PGIM Quant working within the Global Multi-Asset Solutions team. In this capacity, he is responsible for portfolio management, analysis, and economic and market valuation research. Prior to joining PGIM Quant, Joel held various positions for PGIM Fixed Income that involved high-yield credit analysis and performance reporting. He earned a BS and MBA in finance from Rutgers University. Joel is a member of the New York Society of Security Analysts.

Edward J. Lithgow, CFA, is a Vice President and Portfolio Manager for PGIM Quantitative Solutions working within the Quantitative Equity team. In this capacity, he is responsible for portfolio management, analysis and research. Prior to his current role, Ed was a Quantitative Analyst for the Quantitative Equity and Equity Indexing teams responsible for optimizing portfolios, monitoring cash flows and conducting performance attribution and risk analysis. He also traded equities, currencies and futures for the Equity Indexing funds. Ed earned a BS in business administration from Seton Hall University and an MBA in finance from St. Joseph’s University.

Edward Louie is a Vice President and Portfolio Manager for PGIM Quantitative Solutions working within the Quantitative Equity team. In this capacity, he is responsible for portfolio management, trading, analysis and research. Prior to his current role, he served as an Analyst for PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ Equity Indexing and Value strategies. Ed earned a BA in economics from Stony Brook University and an MBA in accounting from Baruch College.

Stacie L. Mintz, CFA, is a Managing Director, Head of the Quantitative Equity team and Portfolio Manager for PGIM Quant. In this capacity, she leads the portfolio managers on the Quantitative Equity team. She is responsible for enhancements to the Quantitative Equity models and portfolio analytic tools. Prior to her current role, she served as the Head of Equity Portfolio Management for PGIM Quant. Previously, Stacie was a member of the former Asset Allocation team where she was responsible for several retail and institutional portfolios. During that time, she was also responsible for managing the overall asset allocation for the Prudential Pension Plan. She earned a BA in economics from Rutgers University and an MBA in finance from the New York University Stern School of Business.

Lorne Johnson, PhD, is a Managing Director and Portfolio Manager working within the Global Multi-Asset Solutions team. As the Director of Institutional Solutions, he serves as a subject matter expert, and performs research and analysis for Global Multi-Asset Solutions portfolios. Prior to joining PGIM Quant, Lorne was a Senior Portfolio Manager at State Street Global Advisors’ Investment Solutions Group with a focus on managing tactical asset allocation portfolios. Previously, Lorne was a Portfolio Manager at CalPERS and Numeric Investors, a Senior Portfolio Manager at ABP Investments, and an Economist at Caxton Associates. He earned a BA in both public administration and history at California State University, an MA in applied economics at San Jose State University and an MA and PhD in economics at the University of Washington.

Edward Tostanoski [To be filed by subsequent amendment]

PGIM, Inc. (“PGIM”) is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc. PGIM was formed in June 1984 and was registered with the SEC as an investment adviser in December 1984. The Fixed Income unit of PGIM (PGIM Fixed Income) is the principal public fixed income asset management unit of PGIM. As of June 30, 2022, PGIM had approximately $93.85 billion in assets under management. PGIM’s address is 655 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102.

PGIM Fixed Income is the primary public fixed-income asset management unit of PGIM, with $43.27 billion in assets under management as of June 30, 2022, and is the unit of PGIM that provides investment advisory services.*

PGIM Fixed Income is organized into groups specializing in different sectors of the fixed income market: US and non-US government bonds, mortgages and asset-backed securities, US and non-US investment grade corporate bonds, high-yield bonds, emerging markets bonds, municipal bonds, and money market securities.

The portfolio managers from PGIM Fixed Income who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Portfolios are Gregory Peters, Michael J. Collins, CFA, Richard Piccirillo, Robert Tipp, CFA and Michael Angelucci.

Gregory Peters is a Managing Director and Co-Chief Investment Officer of PGIM Fixed Income. Mr. Peters is also a senior portfolio manager for Core, Long Government/Credit, Core Plus, Absolute Return, and other multi-sector Fixed Income strategies. Prior to joining the Firm in 2014, Mr. Peters was Morgan Stanley's Global Director of Fixed Income & Economic Research and Chief Global Cross Asset Strategist, responsible for the Firm's macro research and asset allocation strategy. Earlier, he worked at Salomon Smith Barney and the Department of U.S. Treasury. He received a BA in Finance from The College of New Jersey and an MBA from Fordham University. Mr. Peters is a member of the Fixed Income Analyst Society and the Bond Market Association. Mr. Peters was named a 2019 winner of the Pension and Investment Provider Award for Global Multi-Asset Credit.

Michael J. Collins, CFA, is a Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager for Core, Core Plus, Absolute Return, and other Multi-Sector Fixed Income strategies. Previously, Mr. Collins was a High Yield Portfolio Manager and Fixed Income Investment Strategist. Earlier he was a credit research analyst, covering investment grade and high yield corporate credits. Additionally, he developed proprietary quantitative international interest rate and currency valuation models for our global bond unit. Mr. Collins began his career at the Firm in 1986 as a software applications designer. He received a BS in Mathematics and Computer Science from Binghamton University and an MBA in Finance from New York University. Mr. Collins holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation and is a Fellow of the Life Management Institute (FLMI). He currently serves as the Treasurer on the Board of CEA, a non-profit that provides education and employment for people with disabilities. Mr. Collins was named a 2019 winner of the Pension and Investment Provider Award for Global Multi-Asset Credit. Mr. Collins is the host of PGIM Fixed Income’s “All The Credit” podcast.

Richard Piccirillo is a Managing Director and senior portfolio manager for PGIM Fixed Income’s Core, Long Government/Credit, Core Plus, Absolute Return, and other multi-sector Fixed Income strategies. Mr. Piccirillo had specialized in mortgage-and asset-backed securities since joining the Firm in 1993. Before joining the Firm, Mr. Piccirillo was a fixed income analyst with Fischer Francis Trees & Watts. Mr. Piccirillo started his career as a financial analyst at Smith Barney. He received a BBA in Finance from George Washington University and an MBA in Finance and International Business from New York University. Mr. Piccirillo was named a 2019 winner of the Pension and Investment Provider Award for Global Multi-Asset Credit.

Robert Tipp, CFA, is a Managing Director, Chief Investment Strategist, and Head of Global Bonds for PGIM Fixed Income. In addition to comanaging the global multi-sector strategies, Mr. Tipp is responsible for global rates positioning for Core Plus, Absolute Return, and other portfolios. Mr. Tipp has worked at the Firm since 1991, where he has held a variety of senior investment manager and strategist roles. Prior to joining the firm, he was a Director in the Portfolio Strategies Group at the First Boston Corporation, where he developed, marketed, and implemented strategic portfolio products for money managers. Before that, Mr. Tipp was a Senior Staff Analyst at the Allstate Research & Planning Center, and managed fixed income and equity derivative strategies at Wells Fargo Investment Advisors. He received a BS in Business Administration and an MBA from the University of California, Berkeley. Mr. Tipp holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation.

Matthew Angelucci, CFA, is a Principal and co-senior portfolio manager for PGIM Fixed Income’s Global Bond Team. In addition to co-managing the Global Bond Strategies, Mr. Angelucci is responsible for country and sector allocation, term structure positioning, and issue selection within sovereign securities and derivatives across global bond portfolios and relative value hedge strategies. Prior to assuming his current position, he was a financial analyst in the Portfolio Analysis Group where he was responsible for performance attribution and providing daily risk analysis and analytic support to the Global Government portfolio management team. Mr. Angelucci joined the Firm in 2005. He received a BS in Corporate Finance and Accounting from Bentley University. Mr. Angelucci holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation.

PGIM Limited is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of PGIM. PGIM Limited is located at Grand Buildings, 1-3 Strand, Trafalgar Square, London WC2N 5HR. PGIM Limited provides investment advisory services with respect to securities in certain foreign markets. As of June 30, 2022, PGIM Limited managed approximately $40.51 billion in assets.

* PGIM Fixed Income’s assets under management includes the assets under management of PGIM Limited.

Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington”) is a Delaware limited liability partnership. Wellington is a professional investment counseling firm which provides investment services to investment companies, employee benefit plans, endowments, foundations, and other institutions. Wellington and its predecessor organizations have provided investment advisory services for over 90 years. Wellington is owned by the partners of Wellington Management Group LLP, a Massachusetts limited liability partnership. As of June 30, 2022, Wellington had investment management authority with respect to approximately $6.34 billion in assets. The address of Wellington is 280 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.

The portfolio managers from Wellington who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Portfolios are Edward L. Meyi and Mark H. Sullivan, CFA.

Edward Meyi, FRM, Managing Director and Fixed Income Portfolio Manager. Mr. Meyi is a fixed income portfolio manager and member of Wellington’s Global Bond Team. He manages global fixed income portfolios for clients worldwide, including central bank, sovereign wealth fund, pension fund, and mutual fund clients of the firm. Prior to joining the firm in 2002, Mr. Meyi worked at Putnam, BlackRock, Scudder Kemper, and Investors Bank & Trust. Mr. Meyi earned his BA in history from Middlebury College in 1996 and is certified by the Global Association of Risk Professionals as a Financial Risk Manager (FRM).

Mark Sullivan, CFA, CMT, Senior Managing Director and Fixed Income Portfolio Manager. Mr. Sullivan is a portfolio manager and leader of the Global Bond team. In his role, he focuses on manager selection, allocation, and risk management across the team’s multi-strategy investment process. As the manager of portfolio managers, he is responsible for the aggregate risk and investment results within portfolios. In addition, he focuses on business and talent management as the leader of the investment team. Mr. Sullivan joined Wellington in 1999 as a project analyst in Global Relationship Management before becoming a quantitative analyst in the Fixed Income Group. He has been a member of the Global Bond team since 2002. Mark received his BA from Colgate University in 1999. In addition, he holds the Chartered Financial Analyst and Chartered Market Technician designations.

Acquiring Portfolio and Combined Portfolio

Massachusetts Financial Services Company (“MFS”) is the oldest US mutual fund organization. MFS and its predecessor organizations have managed money since 1924 and founded the first mutual fund in the United States. MFS is a subsidiary of Sun Life of Canada (U.S.) Financial Services Holdings, Inc., which in turn is an indirect majority-owned subsidiary of Sun Life Financial Inc. (a diversified financial services company). The principal address of MFS is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199. Net assets under management of the MFS organization were approximately $5.41 billion as of June 30, 2022.

J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (“J.P. Morgan”) is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of J.P. Morgan Chase Co., a publicly held bank holding company and global financial services firm. J.P. Morgan manages assets for governments, corporations, endowments, foundations and individuals worldwide. As of June 30, 2022, J.P. Morgan and its affiliated companies had approximately $7.74 billion in assets under management worldwide. J.P. Morgan’s address is 383 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10179.

Jennison Associates LLC (“Jennison”) is organized under the laws of Delaware as single member limited liability company whose sole member is PGIM, Inc., which is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of PGIM Holding Company LLC, which is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc. As of June 30, 2022, Jennison managed in excess of $12.41 billion in assets for institutional, mutual fund and certain other clients. Jennison’s address is 466 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017.

Additional Information About the Portfolio Managers—Compensation and Conflicts of Interest. For each portfolio manager that is primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio, the SAI of the Trust contains an explanation of the structure of, and method(s) used by each of MFS, J.P. Morgan, Jennison, PGIM Quant, PGIM, PGIM Limited, and Wellington to determine portfolio manager compensation. For each such portfolio manager for the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio, the SAI of the Trust also contains an explanation of any material conflicts of interest that may arise between a portfolio manager’s management of the Target Portfolio’s and the Acquiring Portfolio’s investments and investments in other accounts.

Portfolio Managers: Other Accounts—Additional Information About the Portfolio Managers—Other Accounts and Share Ownership. The SAI of the Trust provides additional information about the compensation for each portfolio manager that is primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Target Portfolio, the Acquiring Portfolio, other accounts managed by those portfolio managers, and ownership of Trust securities by those portfolio managers.

Contractual and Effective Investment Management Fee Rates for the Portfolios

The contractual investment management fee rates for the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are set forth below:

AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio

0.7825% of average daily net assets to $300 million;

0.7725% on next $200 million of average daily net assets;

0.7625% on next $250 million of average daily net assets;

0.7525% on next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets;

0.7425% on next $2.75 billion of average daily net assets;

0.7125% on next $4 billion of average daily net assets;

0.6925% over $10 billion of average daily net assets

AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio*

0.7325% of average daily net assets to $300 million;

0.7225% on next $200 million of average daily net assets;

0.7125% on next $250 million of average daily net assets;

0.7025% on next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets;

0.6925% on next $2.75 billion of average daily net assets;

0.6625% on next $4 billion of average daily net assets;

0.6425% on next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets;

0.6225% on next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets;

0.6025% on next $5 billion of average daily net assets;

0.5825% on next $5 billion of average daily net assets;

0.5625% on next $5 billion of average daily net assets;

0.5425% on next $5 billion of average daily net assets;

0.5225% on next $5 billion of average daily net assets; and

0.5025% over $40 billion of average daily net assets

* Effective June 5, 2021, management fees are calculated on an aggregation of net assets of AST Academic Strategies Portfolio, AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio, AST Capital Growth Asset Allocation Portfolio and AST Preservation Asset Allocation Portfolio

The contractual investment management fee rate for the Acquiring Portfolio is not changing in connection with the Reorganization. Assuming completion of the Reorganization and based on the assets under management for each of the Portfolios as of June 30, 2022, the effective management fee rate for the Combined Portfolio would be 0.52%. Additionally, as noted earlier, based on the current assets under management for each of the Portfolios as of June 30, 2022, and assuming completion of the Reorganization on that date, the pro forma annualized total net operating expense ratio for the Combined Portfolio is lower than the annualized total net operating expense ratio of the Target Portfolio, and is expected to continue to be lower following completion of the Reorganization.

VOTING INFORMATION

Approval of the Reorganization requires approval by a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Target Portfolio, as defined by the 1940 Act. For purposes of the 1940 Act, a majority of the Target Portfolio’s outstanding voting securities is the lesser of (i) 67% of the Target Portfolio’s outstanding voting securities represented at a meeting at which more than 50% of the Target Portfolio’s outstanding voting securities are present in person or represented by proxy, or (ii) more than 50% of the Target Portfolio’s outstanding voting securities. Each Contract owner will be entitled to give voting instructions equivalent to one vote for each full share, and a fractional vote for each fractional share, of the Target Portfolio beneficially owned at the close of business on the record date. If sufficient votes to approve the Reorganization are not received by the date of the Meeting, the Meeting may be adjourned to permit further solicitations of voting instructions. Pursuant to the Trust’s Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, the holders of one-third of the outstanding voting shares present in person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum at any meeting of Trust shareholders.

In accordance with requirements of the SEC, each Participating Insurance Company, as record owner of the shares of the Target Portfolio, will vote all shares of the Target Portfolio, including Target Portfolio shares owned by a Participating Insurance Company in its general account or otherwise, for which it does not receive instructions from the Contract owner beneficially owning the shares or for instructions that are not clearly marked, and the Participating Insurance Company will vote those shares (for the proposal, against the proposal, or abstain) in the same proportion as the votes actually cast in accordance with instructions received from Contract owners (“Shadow Voting”). The presence at the Meeting of the Participating Insurance Companies affiliated with the Manager and other AST portfolios will be sufficient to constitute a quorum. Therefore, this Shadow Voting procedure may result in a relatively small number of Contract owners determining the outcome of the vote. No minimum response is required from the Contract owners before Shadow Voting is applied. An abstention is not counted as an affirmative vote of the type necessary to approve the proposal and, therefore, instructions to the applicable Participating Insurance Company to abstain will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

How to Vote

You can vote your shares in any one of four ways:

By mail, with the enclosed voting instruction card;

Over the Internet;

Attending the Meeting via remote communication at https://viewproxy.com/AST/broadridgevsm/. Please visit the Meeting website no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the day before the Meeting to register. Shareholders will need to register for the Meeting by entering the control number found on the proxy card or voting instruction form on the Meeting website; or

By phone.

If you simply sign and date the voting instruction card but give no voting instructions, your shares will be voted by the Participating Insurance Company in favor of the Plan and in accordance with the views of management upon any unexpected matters that come before the Meeting or adjournment thereof.

Revoking Voting Instructions

Contract owners executing and returning voting instructions may revoke such instructions at any time prior to exercise of those instructions by written notice of such revocation to the Secretary of the Trust, by execution of subsequent voting instructions. In addition, you may revoke such instructions by attending the Meeting via remote communication at https://viewproxy.com/AST/broadridgevsm/.

Please visit the Meeting website no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the day before the Meeting to register. Shareholders will need to register for the Meeting by entering the control number found on the proxy card or voting instruction form on the Meeting website.

Other Matters

The Board does not intend to bring any matters before the Meeting other than those described in this Prospectus/Proxy Statement. The Board is not aware of any other matters to be brought before the Meeting by others. If any other matter legally comes before the Meeting, it is intended that the Participating Insurance Companies will vote in accordance with their judgment.

Solicitation of Voting Instructions

Voting instructions will be solicited principally by mailing this Prospectus/Proxy Statement and its enclosures, but instructions also may be solicited by telephone, facsimile, through electronic means such as email, or in person by officers or representatives of the Trust or the Participating Insurance Company. If the record owner of a Contract is a custodian, nominee, or fiduciary, the Trust may send proxy materials to the record owner for any beneficial owners that such record owner may represent. The Trust may reimburse custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses incurred in connection with proxy solicitations of such beneficial owners.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE TARGET PORTFOLIO
AND THE ACQUIRING PORTFOLIO

Each of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio is a separate series of the Trust, which is also an open-end management investment company registered with the SEC under the 1940 Act. Each of its series is, in effect, a separate mutual fund.

Additional information about the Acquiring Portfolio is included in Exhibit B to this Prospectus/Proxy Statement. Additional information about the Target Portfolio is included in the prospectus and SAI for the Trust under file number 033-24962, dated April 25, 2022, and the portions of that prospectus and SAI relating to the Target Portfolio are incorporated herein by reference. Further information about the Acquiring Portfolio is included in the SAI. The SAI, under file number 033-24962, is incorporated herein by reference. These documents are available upon request and without charge by calling 1-800-778-2255 or by writing to the Trust at 655 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102.

The Trust, on behalf of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio, files proxy materials, reports, and other information with the SEC in accordance with the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the 1940 Act. The Trust also prepares annual reports, which include the management discussion and analysis. The annual report is available both from the SEC and from the Trust. These materials can be inspected and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549, and at the Regional Offices of the SEC located in New York City at 233 Broadway, New York, NY 10279. Also, copies of such material can be obtained from the SEC’s Public Reference Section, Washington, D.C. 20549-6009, upon payment of prescribed fees, or from the SEC’s Internet address at http://www.sec.gov.

PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SHARES

As of the Record Date, the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio had shares/votes outstanding as set forth in the table below.

Target/Acquiring Portfolio				Shares/Votes Outstanding
AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio				218,233,598.659
AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio				401,210,695.161

As of the Record Date, all of the shares of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are owned as of record by various Participating Insurance Company separate accounts related to the Contracts. As noted above, the Participating Insurance Companies are required to offer Contract owners the opportunity to instruct them as to how to vote Target Portfolio shares. The table below sets forth, as of the Record Date, each shareholder that owns beneficially more than 5% of the Target Portfolio or the Acquiring Portfolio.

Target/ Acquiring Portfolios	Beneficial Owner Name^*	Address	Shares/% Ownership
AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio	Pru Annuity Life Assurance Corp PALAC Annuity Attn: Separate Accounts 7th Floor	213 Washington Street Newark, NJ07102-0000	27,677,541.122 / 12.68%
	Pruco Life Insurance Company Plaz Annuity Attn: Separate Accounts 7th Floor	213 Washington Street Newark, NJ07102-0000	171,547,601.763 / 78.61%
	Pruco Life Insurance Company PLNJ Annuity Attn: Separate Accounts 7th Floor	213 Washington Street Newark, NJ07102-0000	18,198,300.880 / 8.34%
AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio	Pru Annuity Life Assurance Corp PALAC Annuity Attn: Separate Accounts 7th Floor	213 Washington Street Newark, NJ07102-0000	81,715,868.485 / 20.37%
	Pruco Life Insurance Company Plaz Annuity Attn: Separate Accounts 7th Floor	213 Washington Street Newark, NJ07102-0000	275,626,957.131 / 68.70%
	Pruco Life Insurance Company PLNJ Annuity Attn: Separate Accounts 7th Floor	213 Washington Street Newark, NJ07102-0000	27,195,508.847 / 6.78%

As of the Record Date, the Trustees and Officers of AST, each as a group, beneficially owned less than 1% of the outstanding voting shares of either of the Portfolios.

* As defined by the SEC, a security is beneficially owned by a person if that person has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to the security

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The financial highlights, which follow will help you evaluate the financial performance of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio. The total return in each chart represents the rate that a shareholder earned on an investment in the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio, assuming reinvestment of all dividends and other distributions. The charts do not reflect any charges under any Contract. Because Contract charges are not included, the actual return that you will receive will be lower than the total return.

The financial highlights for the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio for the fiscal ended December 31, 2021 are derived from the financial statements audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm for such fiscal year, whose reports thereon were unqualified. The information for the fiscal years or periods (as applicable) prior to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 was audited by KPMG LLP, the Trust’s prior independent registered public accounting firm. The Trust’s financial statements are included in the applicable annual reports to shareholders, which are available upon request.

	AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2022			Year Ended December 31,
	(unaudited)			2021			2020			2019			2018			2017
Per Share Operating Performance^(a):
Net Asset Value, beginning of period	$	20.24		$	18.21		$	15.95		$	13.52		$	14.68		$	12.63
Income (Loss) From Investment Operations:
Net investment income (loss)		0.09			0.10			0.12			0.24			0.21			0.18
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment and foreign currency transactions		(3.70	)		1.93			2.14			2.19			(1.37	)		1.87
Total from investment operations		(3.61	)		2.03			2.26			2.43			(1.16	)		2.05
Capital Contributions		—			—			—			—	^(b)(c)(d)		—	^(c)(d)		—
Net Asset Value, end of period	$	16.63		$	20.24		$	18.21		$	15.95		$	13.52		$	14.68
Total Return^(e)		(17.84	)%		11.15	%		14.10	%		18.05	%^(f)		(7.90	)%^(f)		16.23	%
Ratios/Supplemental Data:
Net assets, end of period (in millions)	$	3,530		$	5,012		$	5,107		$	5,030		$	4,323		$	5,643
Average net assets (in millions)	$	4,298		$	5,143		$	4,560		$	4,865		$	5,283		$	5,410
Ratios to average net assets^(g):
Expenses after waivers and/or expense reimbursement		0.97	%^(h)		0.97	%		0.98	%		0.99	%		1.02	%		1.02	%
Expenses before waivers and/or expense reimbursement		1.02	%^(h)		1.02	%		1.02	%		1.02	%		1.02	%		1.02	%
Net investment income (loss)		1.01	%^(h)		0.53	%		0.77	%		1.62	%		1.48	%		1.30	%
Portfolio turnover rate⁽ⁱ⁾		119	%		141	%		217	%		148	%		73	%		48	%

(a) Calculated based on average shares outstanding during the period.

(b) Represents payment received by the Portfolio, from the Investment Manager, in connection for costs incurred due to a portfolio allocation error.

(c) Represents payment received by the Portfolio, from Prudential, in connection with excess foreign withholding tax withheld on dividends and interest from certain countries due to the Portfolio’s tax status as a partnership.

(d) Amount rounds to zero.

(e) Total return is calculated assuming a purchase of a share on the first day and a sale on the last day of each period reported and includes reinvestment of dividends and distributions, if any, and does not reflect the effect of insurance contract charges. Total return does not reflect expenses associated with the separate account such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. Performance figures may reflect fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would be lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Total returns may reflect adjustments to conform to GAAP. Total returns for periods less than one full year are not annualized.

(f) Total return for the year includes the impact of the capital contribution, which was not material to the total return.

(g) Does not include expenses of the underlying funds in which the Portfolio invests.

(h) Annualized.

(i) The Portfolio's turnover rate is calculated in accordance with regulatory requirements, without regard to transactions involving short-term investments, certain derivatives and in-kind transactions (if any). If such transactions were included, the Portfolio's portfolio turnover rate may be higher.

	AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2022			Year Ended December 31,
	(unaudited)			2021			2020			2019			2018			2017
Per Share Operating Performance^(a):
Net Asset Value, beginning of period	$	25.83		$	22.89		$	20.48		$	17.15		$	18.04		$	15.70
Income (Loss) From Investment Operations:
Net investment income (loss)		0.10			0.02			(0.01	)		0.02			0.01			(0.01	)
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment and foreign currency transactions		(4.40	)		2.92			2.42			3.31			(0.90	)		2.35
Total from investment operations		(4.30	)		2.94			2.41			3.33			(0.89	)		2.34
Capital Contributions		—			—			—			—	^(b)(c)		—			—
Net Asset Value, end of period	$	21.53		$	25.83		$	22.89		$	20.48		$	17.15		$	18.04
Total Return^(d)		(16.65	)%		12.84	%		11.77	%		19.42	%^(e)		(4.93	)%		14.90	%
Ratios/Supplemental Data:
Net assets, end of period (in millions)	$	8,570		$	11,348		$	11,217		$	11,118		$	9,755		$	11,445
Average net assets (in millions)	$	10,027		$	11,379		$	10,268		$	10,760		$	11,074		$	11,067
Ratios to average net assets^(f):
Expenses after waivers and/or expense reimbursement		0.77	%^(g)		0.46	%		0.16	%		0.16	%		0.16	%		0.16	%
Expenses before waivers and/or expense reimbursement		0.88	%^(g)		0.57	%		0.16	%		0.16	%		0.16	%		0.16	%
Net investment income (loss)		0.88	%^(g)		0.09	%		(0.06	)%		0.09	%		0.06	%		(0.04	)%
Portfolio turnover rate^(h)		36	%		83	%		45	%		24	%		15	%		15	%

(a) Calculated based on average shares outstanding during the period.

(b) Represents payment received by the Portfolio, from the Investment Manager, in connection for costs incurred due to a portfolio allocation error.

(c) Amount rounds to zero.

(d) Total return is calculated assuming a purchase of a share on the first day and a sale on the last day of each period reported and includes reinvestment of dividends and distributions, if any, and does not reflect the effect of insurance contract charges. Total return does not reflect expenses associated with the separate account such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total returns for all periods shown. Performance figures may reflect fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would be lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Total returns may reflect adjustments to conform to GAAP. Total returns for periods less than one full year are not annualized.

(e) Total return for the year includes the impact of the capital contribution, which was not material to the total return.

(f) Does not include expenses of the underlying funds in which the Portfolio invests.

(g) Annualized.

(h) The Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate is calculated in accordance with regulatory requirements, without regard to transactions involving short-term investments, certain derivatives and in-kind transactions (if any). If such transactions were included, the Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate may be higher.

EXHIBITS TO PROSPECTUS/PROXY STATEMENT

Exhibits

Form of Plan of Reorganization

Summary Prospectus for the Acquiring Portfolio dated April 25, 2022, as Supplemented on June 27, 2022.

The above-described Summary Prospectus for the Acquiring Portfolio is part of this Prospectus/Proxy Statement and will be included in the proxy solicitation mailing to shareholders. For purposes of this EDGAR filing, the above-described Summary Prospectus for the Acquiring Portfolio will be included in the proxy solicitation mailing to shareholders. For purposes of this EDGAR filing, it was filed with the SEC via EDGAR under the Securities Act of 1933 on April 20, 2022, and is incorporated herein by reference.

EXHIBIT A

ADVANCED SERIES TRUST
FORM OF PLAN OF REORGANIZATION

THIS PLAN OF REORGANIZATION (the “Plan”) of Advanced Series Trust, a Massachusetts business trust having its principal place of business at 655 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102 (“AST”), on behalf of the acquiring portfolio listed in Schedule A to this Plan (the “Acquiring Portfolio”) and the target portfolio listed in Schedule A to this Plan (the “Target Portfolio”), is made as of this day of [____], 2022. Together, the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio are referred to herein as the “Portfolios.”

The reorganization for the Target Portfolio (hereinafter referred to as the “Reorganization”) is intended to constitute a tax-free transaction for federal income tax purposes and will consist of: (i) the acquisition by the Acquiring Portfolio of all of the assets of the Target Portfolio and the assumption by the Acquiring Portfolio of all of the liabilities of the Target Portfolio in exchange solely for full and fractional shares of the Acquiring Portfolio (“Acquiring Portfolio Shares”); (ii) the distribution of Acquiring Portfolio Shares to the shareholders of the Target Portfolio according to their respective interests in complete liquidation of the Target Portfolio; and (iii) the dissolution of the Target Portfolio as soon as practicable after the closing (as defined in Section 3, hereinafter called the “Closing”), all upon and subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan hereinafter set forth.

In order to consummate the Plan, the following actions shall be taken by AST on behalf of the Acquiring Portfolio and the Target Portfolio, as applicable:

Sale and Transfer of Assets, Liquidation and Dissolution of Target Portfolio.

(a)

Subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, AST shall: (i) transfer all of the assets of the Target Portfolio, as set forth in Section 1(b) hereof, to the Acquiring Portfolio; and (ii) cause the Acquiring Portfolio to assume all the liabilities of the Target Portfolio as set forth in Section 1(b) hereof. Such transactions shall take place at the Closing.

(b)

The assets of the Target Portfolio to be acquired by the Acquiring Portfolio (collectively, the “Assets”) shall consist of all property, including, without limitation, all cash, securities, commodities and futures interests, and dividends or interest receivable that are owned by the Target Portfolio, and any deferred or prepaid expenses shown as an asset on the books of the Target Portfolio on the Closing date (as defined in Section 3, hereinafter the “Closing Date”). All liabilities, expenses, costs, charges and reserves of the Target Portfolio, to the extent that they exist at or after the Closing, shall after the Closing attach to the Acquiring Portfolio and may be enforced against the Acquiring Portfolio to the same extent as if the same had been incurred by the Acquiring Portfolio.

(c)

Subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan, AST on behalf of the Acquiring Portfolio shall at the Closing deliver to the Target Portfolio the number of Acquiring Portfolio Shares, determined by dividing the net asset value per share of the shares of the Target Portfolio (“Target Portfolio Shares”) on the Closing Date by the net asset value per share of the Acquiring Portfolio Shares, and multiplying the result thereof by the number of outstanding Target Portfolio Shares as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) on the Closing Date. All such values shall be determined in the manner and as of the time set forth in Section 2 hereof.

(d)

Immediately following the Closing, the Target Portfolio shall distribute pro rata to its shareholders of record as of the close of business on the Closing Date, the Acquiring Portfolio Shares received by the Target Portfolio pursuant to this Section 1 and then shall terminate and dissolve. Such liquidation and distribution shall be accomplished by the establishment of accounts on the share records of AST relating to the Acquiring Portfolio and noting in such accounts the type and amounts of Acquiring Portfolio Shares that former Target Portfolio shareholders are due based on their respective holdings of the Target Portfolio as of the close of business on the Closing Date. Fractional Acquiring Portfolio Shares shall be carried to the third decimal place. The Acquiring Portfolio shall not issue certificates representing the Acquiring Portfolio shares in connection with such exchange.

Valuation.

(a)

The value of the Target Portfolio’s Assets to be transferred to the Acquiring Portfolio hereunder shall be computed as of the close of regular trading on the NYSE on the Closing Date (the “Valuation Time”) using the valuation procedures set forth in AST’s current effective prospectus.

(b)

The net asset value of a share of the Acquiring Portfolio shall be determined to the second decimal point as of the Valuation Time using the valuation procedures set forth in AST’s current effective prospectus.

(c)

The net asset value of a share of the Target Portfolio shall be determined to the fourth decimal point as of the Valuation Time using the valuation procedures set forth in AST’s current effective prospectus.

Closing and Closing Date.

The consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby shall take place at the Closing (the “Closing”). The date of the Closing (the “Closing Date”) shall be December 5, 2022, or such other date as determined in writing by AST’s officers. The Closing shall take place at the principal office of AST at 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the Closing Date. AST on behalf of the Target Portfolio shall have provided for delivery as of the Closing of the Target Portfolio’s Assets to the account of the Acquiring Portfolio at the Acquiring Portfolio’s custodians. Also, AST on behalf of the Target Portfolio shall produce at the Closing a list of names and addresses of the shareholders of record of the Target Portfolio Shares and the number of full and fractional shares owned by each such shareholder, all as of the Valuation Time, certified by its transfer agent or by its President to the best of its or his or her knowledge and belief. AST on behalf of the Acquiring Portfolio shall issue and deliver a confirmation evidencing the Acquiring Portfolio Shares to be credited to the Target Portfolio’s account on the Closing Date to the Secretary of AST, or shall provide evidence satisfactory to the Target Portfolio that the Acquiring Portfolio Shares have been registered in an account on the books of the Acquiring Portfolio in such manner as AST on behalf of Target Portfolio may request.

Representations and Warranties by AST on behalf of the Target Portfolio.

AST makes the following representations and warranties about the Target Portfolio:

(a)

The Target Portfolio is a series of AST, a business trust organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and validly existing and in good standing under the laws of that jurisdiction. AST is duly registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end, management investment company and all of the Target Portfolio Shares sold were sold pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”).

(b)

AST on behalf of the Target Portfolio is authorized to issue an unlimited number of the Target Portfolio shares, each outstanding share of which is fully paid, non-assessable, freely transferable and has full voting rights.

(c)

The financial statements appearing in AST’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, fairly present the financial position of the Target Portfolio as of such date and the results of its operations for the periods indicated in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.

(d)

AST has the necessary power and authority to conduct the Target Portfolio’s business as such business is now being conducted.

(e)

AST on behalf of the Target Portfolio is not a party to or obligated under any provision of AST’s Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, or any contract or any other commitment or obligation, and is not subject to any order or decree, that would be violated by its execution of or performance under this Plan.

(f)

The Target Portfolio does not have any unamortized or unpaid organizational fees or expenses.

(g)

The Target Portfolio has elected to be, and is, treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Target Portfolio has satisfied the diversification and look-through requirements of Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), since its inception and will continue to satisfy such requirements at the Closing.

(h)

The Target Portfolio, or its agents, (i) holds a valid Form W-8BEN, Certificate of Foreign Status of Beneficial Owner for United States Withholding (or other appropriate series of Form W-8, as the case may be), or Form W-9, Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification, for the Target Portfolio shareholder of record, which Form W-8 or Form W-9 can be associated with reportable payments made by the Target Portfolio to such shareholder, and/or (ii) has otherwise timely instituted the appropriate nonresident alien or foreign corporation or backup withholding procedures with respect to such shareholder as provided by Sections 1441, 1442, and 3406 of the Code.

(i)

At the Closing, the Target Portfolio will have good and marketable title to all of the securities and other assets shown on the statement of assets and liabilities referred to above, free and clear of all liens or encumbrances of any nature whatsoever, except such imperfections of title or encumbrances as do not materially detract from the value or use of the assets subject thereto, or materially adversely affect title thereto.

(j)

Except as may be disclosed in AST’s current effective prospectus, there is no material suit, judicial action, or legal or administrative proceeding pending or threatened against the Target Portfolio.

(k)

There are no known actual or proposed deficiency assessments with respect to any taxes payable by the Target Portfolio.

(l)

The execution, delivery, and performance of this Plan have been duly authorized by all necessary actions of AST’s Board of Trustees, and this Plan constitutes a valid and binding obligation enforceable in accordance with its terms.

Representations and Warranties by AST on behalf of the Acquiring Portfolio.

AST makes the following representations and warranties about the Acquiring Portfolio:

(a)

The Acquiring Portfolio is a series of AST, a business trust organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts validly existing and in good standing under the laws of that jurisdiction. AST is duly registered under the 1940 Act as an open-end, management investment company and all of the Acquiring Portfolio Shares sold have been sold pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the 1933 Act.

(b)

AST on behalf of the Acquiring Portfolio is authorized to issue an unlimited number of the Acquiring Portfolio shares, each outstanding share of which is fully paid, non-assessable, freely transferable and has full voting rights.

(c)

The financial statements appearing in AST’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, fairly present the financial position of the Acquiring Portfolio as of such date and the results of its operations for the periods indicated in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.

(d)

AST has the necessary power and authority to conduct the Acquiring Portfolio’s business as such business is now being conducted.

(e)

AST on behalf of the Acquiring Portfolio is not a party to or obligated under any provision of AST’s Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, or any contract or any other commitment or obligation, and is not subject to any order or decree, that would be violated by its execution of or performance under this Plan.

(f)

The Acquiring Portfolio has elected to be, and is, treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. The Acquiring Portfolio has satisfied the diversification and look-through requirements of Section 817(h) of the Code since its inception and will continue to satisfy such requirements at the Closing.

(g)

The statement of assets and liabilities to be created by AST for the Acquiring Portfolio as of the Valuation Time for the purpose of determining the number of Acquiring Portfolio Shares to be issued pursuant to this Plan will accurately reflect the Assets in the case of the Target Portfolio and the net asset value in the case of the Acquiring Portfolio, and outstanding shares, as of such date, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.

(h)

At the Closing, the Acquiring Portfolio will have good and marketable title to all of the securities and other assets shown on the statement of assets and liabilities referred to in above, free and clear of all liens or encumbrances of any nature whatsoever, except such imperfections of title or encumbrances as do not materially detract from the value or use of the assets subject thereto, or materially affect title thereto.

(i)

(j)

There are no known actual or proposed deficiency assessments with respect to any taxes payable by the Acquiring Portfolio.

(k)

(l)

AST anticipates that consummation of this Plan will not cause the Acquiring Portfolio to fail to conform to the requirements of Section 817(h) at the end of each tax quarter.

Intentions of AST on behalf of the Portfolios.

(a)

At the Closing, AST on behalf of the Target Portfolio, intends to have available a copy of the shareholder ledger accounts, certified by AST’s transfer agent or its President or a Vice President to the best of its or his or her knowledge and belief, for all the shareholders of record of Target Portfolio Shares as of the Valuation Time who are to become shareholders of the Acquiring Portfolio as a result of the transfer of assets that is the subject of this Plan.

(b)

AST intends to operate each Portfolio’s respective business as presently conducted between the date hereof and the Closing.

(c)

AST intends that the Target Portfolio will not acquire the Acquiring Portfolio Shares for the purpose of making distributions thereof to anyone other than the Target Portfolio’s shareholders.

(d)

AST on behalf of the Target Portfolio intends, if this Plan is consummated, to liquidate and dissolve the Target Portfolio.

(e)

AST intends that, by the Closing, each Portfolio’s Federal and other tax returns and reports required by law to be filed on or before such date shall have been filed, and all Federal and other taxes shown as due on said returns shall have either been paid or adequate liability reserves shall have been provided for the payment of such taxes.

(f)

AST intends to mail to each shareholder of the Target Portfolio entitled to vote at the meeting of its shareholders at which action on this Plan is to be considered, in sufficient time to comply with requirements as to notice thereof, a Combined Proxy Statement and Prospectus that complies in all material respects with the applicable provisions of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 20(a) of the 1940 Act, and the rules and regulations, respectively, thereunder.

(g)

AST intends to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form N-14 under the 1933 Act relating to the Acquiring Portfolio Shares issuable hereunder (“Registration Statement”), and will use its best efforts to provide that the Registration Statement becomes effective as promptly as practicable. At the time the Registration Statement becomes effective, it will: (i) comply in all material respects with the applicable provisions of the 1933 Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; and (ii) not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading. At the time the Registration Statement becomes effective, at the time of the shareholders’ meeting of the Target Portfolio, and at the Closing Date, the prospectus and statement of additional information included in the Registration Statement will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.

Conditions Precedent to be Fulfilled by AST on behalf of the Portfolios.

The consummation of the Plan with respect to the Acquiring Portfolio and the Target Portfolio shall be subject to the following conditions:

(a)

That: (i) all the representations and warranties contained herein concerning the Portfolios shall be true and correct as of the Closing with the same effect as though made as of and at such date; (ii) performance of all obligations required by this Plan to be performed by AST on behalf of the Portfolios shall occur prior to the Closing; and (iii) AST shall execute a certificate signed by the President or a Vice President and by the Secretary or equivalent officer to the foregoing effect.

(b)

That the form of this Plan shall have been adopted and approved by the appropriate action of the Board of Trustees of AST on behalf of the Portfolios.

(c)

That the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission shall not have issued an unfavorable management report under Section 25(b) of the 1940 Act or instituted or threatened to institute any proceeding seeking to enjoin consummation of the Plan under Section 25(c) of the 1940 Act. And, further, that no other legal, administrative or other proceeding shall have been instituted or threatened that would materially affect the financial condition of a Portfolio or would prohibit the transactions contemplated hereby.

(d)

That at or immediately prior to the Closing, the Target Portfolio shall have declared and paid a dividend or dividends which, together with all previous such dividends, shall have the effect of distributing to the Target Portfolio’s shareholders all of such Target Portfolio’s investment company taxable income for taxable years ending at or prior to the Closing and all of its net capital gain, if any, realized in taxable years ending at or prior to the Closing (after reduction for any capital loss carry-forward).

(e)

That there shall be delivered to AST on behalf of the Portfolios an opinion from Goodwin Procter LLP, in form and substance satisfactory to AST, substantially to the effect that the transactions contemplated by this Plan should constitute a tax-free transaction for federal income tax purposes. Such opinion shall contain at a minimum the conclusion that the transfer by the Target Portfolio of all of its assets to the Acquiring Portfolio, in exchange solely for Acquiring Portfolio Shares, the assumption by the Acquiring Portfolio of all of the liabilities of the Target Portfolio, and the distribution of the Acquiring Portfolio Shares to the shareholders of the Target Portfolio in complete liquidation of the Target Portfolio, should be tax-free to the shareholders of the Target Portfolio for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

In giving the opinion set forth above, counsel may state that it is relying on certificates of the officers of AST with regard to matters of fact.

(f)

That the Registration Statement with respect to the Acquiring Portfolio Shares to be delivered to the Target Portfolio’s shareholders in accordance with this Plan shall have become effective, and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the Registration Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto, shall have been issued prior to the Closing Date, or shall be in effect at Closing, and no proceedings for the issuance of such an order shall be pending or threatened on that date.

(g)

That the Acquiring Portfolio Shares to be delivered hereunder shall be eligible for sale by the Acquiring Portfolio with each state commission or agency with which such eligibility is required in order to permit the Acquiring Portfolio Shares lawfully to be delivered to each shareholder of the Target Portfolio.

Expenses.

(a)

AST represents and warrants that there are no broker or finders’ fees payable by it in connection with the transactions provided for herein.

(b)

All costs incurred in entering into and carrying out the terms and conditions of this Plan, including (without limitation) outside legal counsel and independent registered public accounting firm costs and costs incurred in connection with the printing and mailing of the relevant combined prospectus and proxy statement and related materials, and transaction costs, including brokerage commissions, shall be paid by Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC or its affiliates, not the Target Portfolio or the Acquiring Portfolio.

Termination; Postponement; Waiver; Order.

(a)

Anything contained in this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, this Plan may be terminated and abandoned at any time (whether before or after approval thereof by the shareholders of a Target Portfolio) prior to the Closing, or the Closing may be postponed by AST on behalf of a Portfolio by resolution of the Board of Trustees of AST if circumstances develop that, in the opinion of the Board, make proceeding with the Plan inadvisable.

(b)

If the transactions contemplated by this Plan have not been consummated by [ ], the Plan shall automatically terminate on that date, unless a later date is agreed to by the officers of AST on behalf of the Portfolios.

(c)

In the event of termination of this Plan pursuant to the provisions hereof, the Plan shall become void and have no further effect with respect to the Acquiring Portfolio or Target Portfolio, and neither AST, the Acquiring Portfolio nor the Target Portfolio, nor the trustees, officers, agents or shareholders shall have any liability in respect of this Plan.

(d)

At any time prior to the Closing, any of the terms or conditions of this Plan may be waived by the party who is entitled to the benefit thereof by action taken by AST’s Board of Trustees if, in the judgment of such Board of Trustees, such action or waiver will not have a material adverse effect on the benefits intended under this Plan to its shareholders, on behalf of whom such action is taken.

(e)

If any order or orders of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to this Plan shall be issued prior to the Closing and shall impose any terms or conditions that are determined by action of the Board of Trustees of AST on behalf of the Portfolios to be acceptable, such terms and conditions shall be binding as if a part of this Plan without further vote or approval of the shareholders of the Target Portfolio, unless such terms and conditions shall result in a change in the method of computing the number of Acquiring Portfolio Shares to be issued the Target Portfolio, in which event, unless such terms and conditions shall have been included in the proxy solicitation material furnished to the shareholders of the Target Portfolio prior to the meeting at which the transactions contemplated by this Plan shall have been approved, this Plan shall not be consummated and shall terminate, unless AST on behalf of the Target Portfolio shall call a special meeting of shareholders at which such conditions so imposed shall be submitted for approval.

10.

Entire Plan and Amendments.

This Plan embodies the entire plan of AST on behalf of the Portfolios, and there are no agreements, understandings, restrictions, or warranties between the parties other than those set forth or provided for herein. This Plan may be amended only by AST. Neither this Plan nor any interest herein may be assigned without the prior written consent of AST on behalf of the Portfolio corresponding to the Portfolio making the assignment.

11.

Notices.

Any notice, report, or demand required or permitted by any provision of this Plan shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered or mailed, first class postage prepaid, addressed to AST at 655 Broad Street, Newark, NJ 07102, Attention: Secretary.

12.

Governing Law.

This Plan shall be governed by and carried out in accordance with the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts without regard to its conflict of laws principles.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party has executed this Plan by its duly authorized officers, all as of the date and year first written above.

		ADVANCED SERIES TRUST
Attest: Melissa Gonzalez, Assistant Secretary		on behalf of the Acquiring Portfolio listed in Schedule A

		By:

		Title:

		ADVANCED SERIES TRUST
Attest: Melissa Gonzalez, Assistant Secretary		on behalf of the Target Portfolio listed in Schedule A

		By:

		Title:

Schedule A

Target Portfolio		Acquiring Portfolio
AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio		AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio

EXHIBIT B
TO PROSPECTUS/PROXY STATEMENT

The information in this Statement of Additional Information is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This Statement of Additional Information is not an offer to sell these securities, and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
TO PROSPECTUS/PROXY STATEMENT

Dated September 30, 2022

655 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102

Reorganization of the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio into the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio

This Statement of Additional Information (the “SAI”) expands upon and supplements information contained in the combined Proxy Statement of the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio (the “Target Portfolio”), a series of the Advanced Series Trust (the “Trust” or “AST”), and the Prospectus of the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio (the “Acquiring Portfolio,” and together with the Target Portfolio, the “Portfolios”), a series of the Trust, dated September 30, 2022 (such combined Proxy Statement and Prospectus being referred to herein as the “Prospectus/Proxy Statement”).

Target Portfolio		Referred to Herein As
AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio		Target Portfolio

This SAI relates specifically to the proposed transfer of all of the Target Portfolio’s assets to the Acquiring Portfolio in exchange for (i) the Acquiring Portfolio’s assumption of all of the Target Portfolio’s liabilities, and (ii) the Acquiring Portfolio’s issuance to the Target Portfolio of shares of beneficial interest in the Acquiring Portfolio (the “Acquiring Portfolio Shares”). The Acquiring Portfolio Shares received by the Target Portfolio will have an aggregate net asset value that is equal to the aggregate net asset value of the Target Portfolio shares that are outstanding immediately prior to such reorganization transaction. As a result of such transaction, the Target Portfolio will be completely liquidated, and Contract owners will beneficially own shares of the Acquiring Portfolio having an aggregate value equal to their Target Portfolio shares. A vote in favor of the Plan by the shareholders of the Target Portfolio will constitute a vote in favor of the liquidation of the Target Portfolio and the termination of such Portfolio as a separate series of the Trust. The acquisition of the assets of the Target Portfolio by the Acquiring Portfolio in exchange for the Acquiring Portfolio’s assumption of all of the liabilities of the Target Portfolio, and the issuance of Acquiring Portfolio Shares to the Target Portfolio and its shareholders, is referred to herein as the “Reorganization.” If shareholders of the Target Portfolio approve the Plan and the Reorganization is consummated, they will become shareholders of the Acquiring Portfolio.

This SAI consists of: (i) this Cover Page, (ii) a comparison of the investment restrictions of the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio, and (iii) pro forma financial information relating to the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio. Additional information relating to the Acquiring Portfolio is included in the SAI under file number 033-24962, dated April 25, 2022 (the “Trust SAI”), which is hereby incorporated by reference. Those portions of the Trust SAI, under file number 033-24962, relating to the Target Portfolios are incorporated herein by reference.

S-1

Audited financial statements and accompanying notes for the Target Portfolio for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, and the independent auditors’ report thereon, dated February 24, 2022, are incorporated herein by reference from the Trust’s Annual Report to Shareholders under file number 811-05186.

Audited financial statements and accompanying notes for the Acquiring Portfolio for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, and the independent auditor’s report thereon, dated February 24, 2022, are incorporated herein by reference from the Trust’s Annual Report to Shareholders under file number 811-05186.

This SAI is not a Prospectus; you should read this SAI in conjunction with the Prospectus/Proxy Statement, which relates to the Reorganization. You can request a copy of the Prospectus/Proxy Statement by calling 1-800-778-2255 or by writing to AST at 655 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102. In addition, a copy of the Prospectus/Proxy Statement is available on the internet at www.prudential.com/variableinsuranceportfolios. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains this SAI and other material incorporated by reference and considered part of this SAI and the Prospectus/Proxy Statement, together with other information regarding AST.

S-2

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page No.
Investment Restrictions	S-4

Supplemental Financial Information	S-6

Additional Information Relating to the Acquiring Portfolio and the Combined Portfolio	S-7

S-3

INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS

Set forth below are certain investment restrictions applicable to the Target Portfolio and the Acquiring Portfolio. Fundamental restrictions may not be changed by the Board without a majority vote of shareholders as required by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). Non-fundamental restrictions may be changed by the Board without shareholder approval.

Fundamental Investment Restrictions Applicable to the Target Portfolio

Under its fundamental investment restrictions, the Target Portfolio may not:

Issue senior securities, except as permitted under the 1940 Act.

Borrow money, except that the Target Portfolio may (i) borrow money for non-leveraging, temporary or emergency purposes, and (ii) engage in reverse repurchase agreements and make other investments or engage in other transactions, which may involve a borrowing, in a manner consistent with the Target Portfolio’s investment objective and policies; provided that the combination of (i) and (ii) shall not exceed 331∕3% of the value of the Target Portfolio’s assets (including the amount borrowed) less liabilities (other than borrowings) or such other percentage permitted by law. Any borrowings that come to exceed this amount will be reduced in accordance with applicable law. Subject to the above limitations, the Target Portfolio may borrow from persons to the extent permitted by applicable law, including the 1940 Act, or to the extent permitted by any exemption from the 1940 Act that may be granted by the SEC, or any SEC releases, no-action letters or similar relief or interpretive guidance.

Underwrite securities issued by other persons, except to the extent that the Target Portfolio may be deemed to be an underwriter (within the meaning of the 1933 Act) in connection with the purchase and sale of portfolio securities.

Purchase or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or other instruments; provided that this restriction shall not prohibit the Target Portfolio from investing in securities or other instruments backed by real estate or in securities of companies engaged in the real estate business.

Purchase or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments; provided that this restriction shall not prohibit the Target Portfolio from (i) engaging in permissible options and futures transactions and forward foreign currency contracts in accordance with the Target Portfolio’s investment policies, or (ii) investing in securities of any kind.

Make loans, except that the Target Portfolio may (i) lend portfolio securities in accordance with the Target Portfolio’s investment policies in amounts up to 331∕3% of the total assets of the Target Portfolio taken at market value, (ii) purchase money market securities and enter into repurchase agreements, (iii) acquire publicly distributed or privately placed debt securities, and (iv) make loans of money to other investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act or any exemption therefrom that may be granted by the SEC or any SEC releases, no-action letters or similar relief or interpretive guidance.

Purchase any security if, as a result, more than 25% of the value of the Target Portfolio’s assets would be invested in the securities of issuers having their principal business activities in the same industry; provided that this restriction does not apply to investments in obligations issued or guaranteed by the US Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities or to municipal securities (or repurchase agreements with respect thereto). For purposes of this limitation, investments in other investment companies shall not be considered an investment in any particular industry.

S-4

With respect to 75% of the value of its total assets, purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the US Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities) if, as a result, (i) more than 5% of the value of the Target Portfolio’s total assets would be invested in the securities of such issuer, or (ii) more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer would be held by the Target Portfolio.

If a restriction on the Target Portfolio’s investments is adhered to at the time an investment is made, a subsequent change in the percentage of the Portfolio assets invested in certain securities or other instruments, or change in average duration of the Target Portfolio’s investment portfolio, resulting from changes in the value of the Target Portfolio’s total assets, will not be considered a violation of the restriction; provided, however, that the asset coverage requirement applicable to borrowings shall be maintained in the manner contemplated by applicable law.

With respect to investment restriction (6), the restriction on making loans is not considered to limit the Target Portfolio’s investments in loan participations and assignments.

With respect to investment restriction (7), the Target Portfolio will not consider a bank-issued guaranty or financial guaranty insurance as a separate security for purposes of determining the percentage of the Target Portfolio’s assets invested in the securities of issuers in a particular industry.

With respect to investment restrictions (2) and (6), the Target Portfolio will not borrow or lend to any other fund unless it applies for and receives an exemptive order from the SEC, if so required, or the SEC issues rules permitting such transactions.

Fundamental Investment Restrictions Applicable to the Acquiring Portfolio

Under its fundamental investment restrictions, the Acquiring Portfolio may not:

Issue senior securities, except as permitted under the 1940 Act.

Borrow money, except to the extent permitted by applicable law from time to time. Note: The 1940 Act currently permits an open-end investment company to borrow money from a bank so long as the ratio which the value of the total assets of the investment company (including the amount of any such borrowing), less the amount of all liabilities and indebtedness (other than such borrowing) of the investment company, bears to the amount of such borrowing is at least 300%. An open-end investment company may also borrow money from other lenders in accordance with applicable law and positions of the SEC and its staff. The Acquiring Portfolio may engage in reverse repurchase arrangements without limit, subject to applicable requirements related to segregation of assets.

Underwrite securities issued by other persons, except to the extent that the Acquiring Portfolio may be deemed to be an underwriter (within the meaning of the 1933 Act) in connection with the purchase and sale of portfolio securities.

Purchase or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or other instruments; provided that this restriction shall not prohibit the Acquiring Portfolio from investing in securities or other instruments backed by real estate or in securities of companies engaged in the real estate business.

Purchase or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments; provided that this restriction shall not prohibit the Acquiring Portfolio from (i) engaging in permissible options and futures transactions and forward foreign currency contracts in accordance with the Acquiring Portfolio’s investment policies, or (ii) investing in securities of any kind.

S-5

Make loans, except that the Acquiring Portfolio may (i) lend portfolio securities in accordance with the Acquiring Portfolio’s investment policies in amounts up to 331∕3% of the total assets of the Acquiring Portfolio taken at market value, (ii) purchase money market securities and enter into repurchase agreements, (iii) acquire publicly distributed or privately placed debt securities, and (iv) make loans of money to other investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act or any exemption therefrom that may be granted by the SEC or any SEC releases, no-action letters or similar relief or interpretive guidance.

Purchase any security if, as a result, more than 25% of the value of the Acquiring Portfolio’s assets would be invested in the securities of issuers having their principal business activities in the same industry; provided that this restriction does not apply to investments in obligations issued or guaranteed by the US Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities or to municipal securities (or repurchase agreements with respect thereto). For purposes of this limitation, investments in other investment companies shall not be considered an investment in any particular industry.

If a restriction on the Acquiring Portfolio’s investments is adhered to at the time an investment is made, a subsequent change in the percentage of the Acquiring Portfolio’s assets invested in certain securities or other instruments, or change in average duration of the Acquiring Portfolio’s investment portfolio, resulting from changes in the value of the Acquiring Portfolio’s total assets, will not be considered a violation of the restriction; provided, however, that the asset coverage requirement applicable to borrowings shall be maintained in the manner contemplated by applicable law.

With respect to investment restrictions (2) and (6), the Acquiring Portfolio will not borrow or lend to any other fund unless it applies for and receives an exemptive order from the SEC, if so required, or the SEC issues rules permitting such transactions.

With respect to investment restriction (6), the restriction on making loans is not considered to limit the Acquiring Portfolio’s investments in loan participations and assignments.

With respect to investment restriction (7), the Acquiring Portfolio will not consider a bank-issued guaranty or financial guaranty insurance as a separate security for purposes of determining the percentage of the Acquiring Portfolio’s assets invested in the securities of issuers in a particular industry.

SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Tables showing the fees and expenses of the Target Portfolios and the Acquiring Portfolio, and the fees and expenses of the Target Portfolio on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the proposed Reorganization, is included in the “Comparison of Investment Management Fees and Total Fund Operating Expenses” section of the Proxy Statement and Prospectus.

The Reorganization will not result in a material change to the Target Portfolio’s investment portfolio due to the investment restrictions of the Acquiring Portfolio. In particular, each security held by the Target Portfolio is eligible to be held by the Acquiring Portfolio. As part of the Reorganization, the Acquiring Portfolio does not plan to reposition the Target Portfolio following the Reorganization, because the Acquiring Portfolio has substantially similar investment objectives and substantially similar strategies and policies. Notwithstanding the foregoing, changes may be made to the Target Portfolio’s portfolio in advance of the Reorganization and/or the Acquiring Portfolio’s portfolio following the Reorganization in the ordinary course of business.

There are no material differences in accounting policies of the Target Portfolio as compared to those of the Acquiring Portfolio.

S-6

Additional Information Relating to the Acquiring Portfolio and the Combined Portfolio

Introduction

Additional information relating specifically to the Combined Portfolio is set forth below.

Subadvisory Agreements for the Combined Portfolio

The Manager has entered into subadvisory agreements with MFS, J.P. Morgan, Jennison, PGIM Quant, PGIM, Inc. (PGIM Fixed Income), PGIM Limited, and Wellington pursuant to which PGIM Investments (and not the Combined Portfolio) will pay MFS, JP Morgan, Jennison, PGIM Quant, PGIM, Inc. (PGIM Fixed Income), PGIM Limited, and Wellington at the rates shown below.

Subadvisers		Current Contractual Subadvisory Fee Rate

Massachusetts Financial Services Company		0.30% of average daily net assets to $100 million; 0.285% of the next $150 million of average daily net assets; 0.27% of the next $250 million of average daily net assets; and 0.25% of average daily net assets over $500 million

J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.		For Large Cap Core: 0.20% of average daily net assets to $500 million; 0.18% of the next $500 million of average daily net assets; and 0.17% of average daily net assets over $1 billion. For Equity Income: 0.34% of average daily net assets

Jennison Associates LLC		0.35% of average daily net assets to $100 million; 0.30% of the next $100 million of average daily net assets; 0.275% of the next $300 million of average daily net assets; 0.25% of the next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets; and 0.23% of average daily net assets over $3 billion

PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC		For Asset Allocation Services: 0.04% of average daily net assets For Quantitative Equity Management (including the overlay sleeve): 0.30% of average daily net assets to $1 billion; 0.25% of average daily net assets on next $5 billion; and 0.225% of average daily net assets over $6 billion.

PGIM, Inc.		PGIM Fixed Income: 0.17% of average daily net assets to $750 million; 0.16% of the next $750 million of average daily net assets; and 0.14% of average daily net assets over $1.5 billion

Wellington Management Company LLP		0.19% of average daily net assets

S-7

Portfolio Managers: Other Accounts

Additional Information About the Portfolio Managers—Other Accounts and Share Ownership—Acquiring Portfolio

The following table sets forth information about the Acquiring Portfolio and accounts other than the Acquiring Portfolio for which the portfolio managers are primarily responsible for day-to-day portfolio management as of December 31, 2021. The table shows, for each such portfolio manager, the number of accounts managed and the total assets in such accounts, within each of the following categories: registered investment companies, other pooled investment vehicles, and other accounts. For each category, the number of accounts and total assets in the accounts whose fees are based on performance is indicated in italics typeface. The table also sets forth the dollar range of equity securities of each portfolio of the Trust beneficially owned by the portfolio managers as of December 31, 2021.

Manager and/or Subadvisers	Portfolio Managers	Registered Investment Companies	Other Pooled Investment Vehicles	Other Accounts	Ownership of Fund Securities
PGIM Investments LLC (Strategic Investment Research Group)	Brian Ahrens,	[TO BE ADDED BY SUBSEQUENT FILING]
	Andrei O. Marinich, CFA

MFS	[_____]

J.P. Morgan	Wonseok Choi
	Lindsey Houghton
	Akash Gupta, CFA
	Jonathan L. Tse, CFA
	Phillip D. Hart, CFA

Jennison	David M. Dabora, CFA
	George Gumpert, CFA

PGIM Quant	Edward L. Campbell, CFA
	Rory Cummings, CFA
	Marco Aiolfi, PhD
	Devang Cambhirwala
	Wen Jin, PhD,CFA
	Joel Kallman, CFA
	Edward Tostanoski Joel Kallman J. Lithgow, CFA
	Edward Louie
	Stacie L. Mintz, CFA
	Lorne Johnson, PhD

PGIM Fixed Income	Gregory Peters
	Michael J. Collins, CFA
	Richard Piccirillo
	Robert Tipp, CFA
	Michael Angelucci

PGIM Limited Wellington	Edward L. Meyi
	Mark H. Sullivan, CFA

S-8

Additional Information About the Portfolio Managers—Compensation and Conflicts of Interest—Acquiring Portfolio and Combined Portfolio

PGIM Investments LLC (“PGIM Investments”)

PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMPENSATION. Prudential provides compensation opportunities to eligible employees to motivate and reward the achievement of outstanding results by providing market-based programs that:

Attract and reward highly qualified employees

Align with critical business goals and objectives

Link to the performance results relevant to the business segment and Prudential

Retain top performers

Pay for results and differentiate levels of performance

Foster behaviors and contributions that promote Prudential’s success

The components of compensation for a Vice President in PGIM Investments consists of base salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation.

S-9

Base Pay Overview: The Prudential compensation structure is organized in grades, each with its own minimum and maximum base pay (i.e., salary). The grades reflect pay patterns in the market. Each job in the plan—from CEO through an entry-level job—is included in one of the grades. The main determinant of placement in the base pay structure is market data. On an annual basis, Corporate Compensation collects and analyzes market data to determine if any change to the placement of job in the structure is necessary to maintain market competitiveness. If necessary, structural compensation changes (e.g., increases to base pay minimum and maximums) will be effective on the plan’s effective date for base pay increases.

Annual Incentive Compensation Overview: The plan provides an opportunity for all participants to share in the annual results of Prudential, as well as the results of their division or profit center. Results are reviewed and incentive payments are made as early as practicable after the close of the plan year. Incentive payments are awarded based on organizational performance—which determines the available dollar amounts—and individual performance. Individual performance will be evaluated on the basis of contributions relative to others in the organization. Incentive payments are granted from a budgeted amount of money that is made available by the Company. Initial budgets are developed by determining the competitive market rates for incentives as compared to our comparator companies. Each organization’s budget pool may be increased or decreased based on organizational performance. Organizational performance is determined by a review of performance relative to our comparator group, as well as key measures indicated in our business plan, such as Return on Required Equity (RORE), earnings and revenue growth.

Long Term Incentive Compensation Overview: In addition, executives at the Vice President level and above are eligible to participate in a long-term incentive program to provide an ownership stake in Prudential Financial. Long-Term incentives currently consist of restricted stock and stock options. The stock options vest 1/3 per year over 3 years and the restricted stock vests 100% at the end of 3 years.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. PGIM Investments follows Prudential Financial’s policies on business ethics, personal securities trading by investment personnel, and information barriers and has adopted a code of ethics, allocation policies, supervisory procedures and conflicts of interest policies, among other policies and procedures, which are designed to ensure that clients are not harmed by these potential or actual conflicts of interests; however, there is no guarantee that such policies and procedures will detect and ensure avoidance, disclosure or mitigation of each and every situation in which a conflict may arise.

Massachusetts Financial Services Company (“MFS”)

Massachusetts Financial Services Company.

COMPENSATION. MFS’ philosophy is to align portfolio manager compensation with the goal to provide shareholders with long-term value through a collaborative investment process. Therefore, MFS uses long-term investment performance as well as contribution to the overall investment process and collaborative culture as key factors in determining portfolio manager compensation. In addition, MFS seeks to maintain total compensation programs that are competitive in the asset management industry in each geographic market where it has employees. MFS uses competitive compensation data to ensure that compensation practices are aligned with its goals of attracting, retaining, and motivating the highest-quality professionals.

MFS reviews portfolio manager compensation annually. In determining portfolio manager compensation, MFS uses quantitative means and qualitative means to help ensure a sustainable investment process. As of December 31, 2021, portfolio manager total cash compensation is a combination of base salary and performance bonus:

Base Salary – Base salary generally represents a smaller percentage of portfolio manager total cash compensation than performance bonus.

II.

Performance Bonus – Generally, the performance bonus represents more than a majority of portfolio manager total cash compensation.

With respect to each portfolio manager except Mr. Joseph Flaherty, Jr., Mr. Ted Maloney, and Ms. Alison O’Neill Mackey the performance bonus is based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative factors, generally with more weight given to the former and less weight given to the latter.

S-10

The quantitative portion is primarily based on the pre-tax performance of accounts managed by the portfolio manager over a range of fixed-length time periods, intended to provide the ability to assess performance over time periods consistent with a full market cycle and a strategy's investment horizon. The fixed-length time periods include the portfolio manager's full tenure on each fund and, when available, ten-, five-, and three-year periods. For portfolio managers who have served for less than three years, shorter-term periods, including the one-year period, will also be considered, as will performance in previous roles, if any, held at the firm. Emphasis is generally placed on longer performance periods when multiple performance periods are available. Performance is evaluated across the full set of strategies and portfolios managed by a given portfolio manager, relative to appropriate peer group universes and/or representative indices (“benchmarks”). As of December 31, 2021, the following benchmarks were used to measure the following portfolio managers' performance for the following Portfolios:

AST MFS Global Equity Portfolio

Portfolio Manager: Roger Morley
Benchmark(s): MSCI World Index (net div)

Portfolio Manager: Ryan McAllister
Benchmark(s): MSCI World Index (net div)

AST MFS Growth Portfolio
Portfolio Manager: Eric Fischman
Benchmark(s): Russell 1000® Growth Index

Portfolio Manager: Paul Gordon
Benchmark(s): Russell 1000® Growth Index

Portfolio Manager: Bradford Mak
Benchmark(s): Russell 1000® Growth Index

AST Large-Cap Core Portfolio
Portfolio Manager: Jude Jason
Benchmark(s): S&P 500 Index

AST MFS Large-Cap Value Portfolio
Portfolio Manager: Nevin Chitkara
Benchmark: Russell 1000® Value Index

Portfolio Manager: Katherine Cannan
Benchmark: Russell 1000® Value Index

AST Mid-Cap Growth Portfolio

Portfolio Manager: Eric Braz
Benchmark(s): Russell Midcap® Growth Index

Portfolio Manager: Eric Fischman
Benchmark: Russell Midcap Growth Index

Portfolio Manager: Paul Gordon
Benchmark: Russell Midcap Growth Index

AST MFS Growth Allocation Portfolio

Portfolio Manager: Natalie Shapiro
Benchmarks: Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index, MSCI Europe, Australasia, Far East (EAFE) Index (net div), FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Real Estate Index (net div), Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index

AST Mid Cap Value Portfolio

Portfolio Manager: Richard Offen
Benchmark: Russell Midcap® Value Index

S-11

Portfolio Manager: Kevin Schmitz
Benchmark: MSCI USA Mid Cap Value Index (gross div)

Portfolio Manager: Brooks Taylor
Benchmark: MSCI USA Mid Cap Value Index (gross div)

Benchmarks may include versions and components of indices, custom indices, and linked indices that combine performance of different indices for different portions of the time period, where appropriate.

The qualitative portion is based on the results of an annual internal peer review process (where portfolio managers are evaluated by other portfolio managers, analysts, and traders) and management’s assessment of overall portfolio manager contribution to the MFS investment process and the client experience (distinct from fund and other account performance).

The performance bonus is generally a combination of cash and a deferred cash award. A deferred cash award is issued for a cash value and becomes payable over a three-year vesting period if the portfolio manager remains in the continuous employ of MFS or its affiliates. During the vesting period, the value of the unfunded deferred cash award will fluctuate as though the portfolio manager had invested the cash value of the award in an MFS Fund(s) selected by the portfolio manager.

With respect to Mr. Joseph Flaherty, Jr., his compensation reflects his broader role within MFS as Chief Investment Risk Officer in addition to being a portfolio manager. His performance bonus is based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative factors, generally with more weight given to the former and less weight given to the latter. The quantitative portion is based on overall group investment performance and business performance metrics. The qualitative portion is based on the results of an annual internal review process conducted by the Chief Investment Officer which takes into account his broad leadership responsibilities. This performance bonus is generally a combination of cash and a deferred cash award. A deferred cash award is issued for a cash value and becomes payable over a three-year vesting period if the portfolio manager remains in the continuous employ of MFS or its affiliates. During the vesting period, the value of the unfunded deferred cash award will fluctuate as though the portfolio manager had invested the cash value of the award in an MFS Fund(s) selected by the portfolio manager.

With respect to Mr. Ted Maloney, his compensation reflects his broader role within MFS as Chief Investment Officer of MFS in addition to being a portfolio manager. The Chief Executive Officer of MFS determines and recommends the amount of his compensation to the Sun Life Management Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of Sun Life Financial, Inc. (the ultimate parent company of MFS). His performance bonus is based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative factors. The quantitative portion is based on overall group investment performance and business performance metrics. The qualitative portion is based on the results of an annual internal review process conducted by the Chief Executive Officer which takes into account his broad leadership responsibilities. In addition, Mr. Maloney participates in a mandatory deferred compensation program whereby a portion of his performance bonus is deferred and awarded in the form of restricted stock units.

With respect to Ms. Alison O'Neill Mackey, her compensation reflects her broader role within MFS as Co-Chief Investment Officer-Equity-Americas in addition to being a portfolio manager. Her performance bonus is based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative factors, generally with more weight given to the former and less weight given to the latter. The quantitative portion is based on the pre-tax performance of accounts managed by Ms. O'Neill Mackey over a range of fixed-length time periods and overall group investment performance and business performance metrics. The qualitative portion is based on the results of an annual internal review process conducted by the Chief Investment Officer which takes into account her broad leadership responsibilities. This performance bonus is generally a combination of cash and a deferred cash award. A deferred cash award is issued for a cash value and becomes payable over a three-year vesting period if the portfolio manager remains in the continuous employ of MFS or its affiliates. During the vesting period, the value of the unfunded deferred cash award will fluctuate as though the portfolio manager had invested the cash value of the award in an MFS Fund(s) selected by the portfolio manager.

MFS Equity Plan – Portfolio managers also typically benefit from the opportunity to participate in the MFS Equity Plan. Equity interests are awarded by management, on a discretionary basis, taking into account tenure at MFS, contribution to the investment process, and other factors.

S-12

Finally, portfolio managers also participate in benefit plans (including a defined contribution plan and health and other insurance plans) and programs available generally to other employees of MFS. The percentage such benefits represent of any portfolio manager’s compensation depends upon the length of the individual’s tenure at MFS and salary level, as well as other factors.

POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. MFS seeks to identify potential conflicts of interest resulting from a portfolio manager's management of both the Portfolio and other accounts, and has adopted policies and procedures designed to address such potential conflicts. There is no guarantee that MFS will be successful in identifying or mitigating conflicts of interest.

The management of multiple funds and accounts (including accounts in which MFS or an affiliate has an interest) gives rise to conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives and strategies, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees, as a portfolio manager must allocate his or her time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. In certain instances, there are securities which are suitable for the Portfolio’s portfolio as well as for one or more other accounts advised by MFS or its subsidiaries (including accounts in which MFS or an affiliate has an interest) with similar investment objectives. MFS’ trade allocation policies could have a detrimental effect on the Portfolio if the Portfolio's orders do not get fully executed or are delayed in getting executed due to being aggregated with those of other accounts advised by MFS or its subsidiaries. A portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely affect the value of the Portfolio's investments. Investments selected for funds or accounts other than the Portfolio may outperform investments selected for the Portfolio.

When two or more accounts are simultaneously engaged in the purchase or sale of the same security, the securities are allocated among clients in a manner believed by MFS to be fair and equitable to each over time. Allocations may be based on many factors and may not always be pro rata based on assets managed. The allocation methodology could have a detrimental effect on the price or availability of a security with respect to the Portfolio.

MFS and/or a portfolio manager may have a financial incentive to allocate favorable or limited opportunity investments or structure the timing of investments to favor accounts other than the Portfolio, for instance, those that pay a higher advisory fee and/or have a performance adjustment, those that include an investment by the portfolio manager, and/or those in which MFS, its officers and/or employees, and/or its affiliates own or have an interest.

To the extent permitted by applicable law, certain accounts may invest their assets in other accounts advised by MFS or its affiliates, including accounts that are advised by one or more of the same portfolio manager(s), which could result in conflicts of interest relating to asset allocation, timing of purchases and redemptions, and increased profitability for MFS, its affiliates, and/or its personnel, including portfolio managers.

J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (“J.P. Morgan”)

POTENTIAL CONFLICTS. The potential for conflicts of interest exists when portfolio managers manage other accounts with similar investment objectives and strategies as the Fund (“Similar Accounts”). Potential conflicts may include, for example, conflicts between investment strategies and conflicts in the allocation of investment opportunities. Responsibility for managing JPMorgan’s and its affiliates’ clients’ portfolios is organized according to investment strategies within asset classes. Generally, client portfolios with similar strategies are managed by portfolio managers in the same portfolio management group using the same objectives, approach and philosophy. Underlying sectors or strategy allocations within a larger portfolio are likewise managed by portfolio managers who use the same approach and philosophy as similarly managed portfolios. Therefore, portfolio holdings, relative position sizes and industry and sector exposures tend to be similar across similar portfolios and strategies, which minimizes the potential for conflicts of interest.

JPMorgan and/or its affiliates (“JPMorgan Chase”) perform investment services, including rendering investment advice, to varied clients. JPMorgan, JPMorgan Chase and its or their directors, officers, agents, and/or employees may render similar or differing investment advisory services to clients and may give advice or exercise investment responsibility and take such other action with respect to any of its other clients that differs from the advice given or the timing or nature of action taken with respect to another client or group of clients. It is JPMorgan’s policy, to the extent practicable, to allocate, within its reasonable discretion, investment opportunities among clients over a period of time on a fair and equitable basis. One or more of JPMorgan’s other client accounts may at any time hold, acquire, increase, decrease, dispose, or otherwise deal with positions in investments in which another client account may have an interest from time-to-time.

S-13

JPMorgan, JPMorgan Chase, and any of its or their directors, partners, officers, agents or employees, may also buy, sell, or trade securities for their own accounts or the proprietary accounts of JPMorgan and/or JPMorgan Chase. JPMorgan and/or JPMorgan Chase, within their discretion, may make different investment decisions and other actions with respect to their own proprietary accounts than those made for client accounts, including the timing or nature of such investment decisions or actions. Further, JPMorgan is not required to purchase or sell for any client account securities that it, JPMorgan Chase, and any of its or their employees, principals, or agents may purchase or sell for their own accounts or the proprietary accounts of JPMorgan, or JPMorgan Chase or its clients.

JPMorgan and/or its affiliates may receive more compensation with respect to certain Similar Accounts than that received with respect to the Fund or may receive compensation based in part on the performance of certain Similar Accounts. This may create a potential conflict of interest for JPMorgan and its affiliates or the portfolio managers by providing an incentive to favor these Similar Accounts when, for example, placing securities transactions. In addition, JPMorgan or its affiliates could be viewed as having a conflict of interest to the extent that JPMorgan or an affiliate has a proprietary investment in Similar Accounts, the portfolio managers have personal investments in Similar Accounts or the Similar Accounts are investment options in JPMorgan’s or its affiliates’ employee benefit plans. Potential conflicts of interest may arise with both the aggregation and allocation of securities transactions and allocation of investment opportunities because of market factors or investment restrictions imposed upon JPMorgan and its affiliates by law, regulation, contract or internal policies. Allocations of aggregated trades, particularly trade orders that were only partially completed due to limited availability and allocation of investment opportunities generally, could raise a potential conflict of interest, as JPMorgan or its affiliates may have an incentive to allocate securities that are expected to increase in value to favored accounts. Initial public offerings, in particular, are frequently of very limited availability. JPMorgan and its affiliates may be perceived as causing accounts they manage to participate in an offering to increase JPMorgan’s and its affiliates’ overall allocation of securities in that offering. A potential conflict of interest also may be perceived to arise if transactions in one account closely follow related transactions in a different account, such as when a purchase increases the value of securities previously purchased by another account, or when a sale in one account lowers the sale price received in a sale by a second account. If JPMorgan or its affiliates manage accounts that engage in short sales of securities of the type in which the Fund invests, JPMorgan or its affiliates could be seen as harming the performance of the Fund for the benefit of the accounts engaging in short sales if the short sales cause the market value of the securities to fall.

As an internal policy matter, JPMorgan or its affiliates may from time to time maintain certain overall investment limitations on the securities positions or positions in other financial instruments JPMorgan or its affiliates will take on behalf of its various clients due to, among other things, liquidity concerns and regulatory restrictions. Such policies may preclude the Fund from purchasing particular securities or financial instruments, even if such securities or financial instruments would otherwise meet the Fund’s objectives.

The goal of JPMorgan and its affiliates is to meet their fiduciary obligation with respect to all clients. JPMorgan and its affiliates have policies and procedures that seek to manage conflicts. JPMorgan and its affiliates monitor a variety of areas, including compliance with fund guidelines, review of allocation decisions and compliance with JPMorgan’s Codes of Ethics and JPMorgan Chase and Co.’s Code of Conduct. With respect to the allocation of investment opportunities, JPMorgan and its affiliates also have certain policies designed to achieve fair and equitable allocation of investment opportunities among its clients over time. For example: Orders for the same equity security traded through a single trading desk or system are aggregated on a continual basis throughout each trading day consistent with JPMorgan’s and its affiliates’ duty of best execution for their clients. If aggregated trades are fully executed, accounts participating in the trade will be allocated their pro rata share on an average price basis. Partially completed orders generally will be allocated among the participating accounts on a pro-rata average price basis, subject to certain limited exceptions. For example, accounts that would receive a de minimis allocation relative to their size may be excluded from the order. Another exception may occur when thin markets or price volatility require that an aggregated order be completed in multiple executions over several days. If partial completion of the order would result in an uneconomic allocation to an account due to fixed transaction or custody costs, JPMorgan and its affiliates may exclude small orders until 50% of the total order is completed. Then the small orders will be executed. Following this procedure, small orders will lag in the early execution of the order, but will be completed before completion of the total order.

S-14

Purchases of money market instruments and fixed income securities cannot always be allocated pro-rata across the accounts with the same investment strategy and objective. However, the Adviser and its affiliates attempt to mitigate any potential unfairness by basing non-pro rata allocations traded through a single trading desk or system upon objective predetermined criteria for the selection of investments and a disciplined process for allocating securities with similar duration, credit quality and liquidity in the good faith judgment of the Adviser or its affiliates so that fair and equitable allocation will occur over time.

PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMPENSATION. JPMorgan’s compensation programs are designed to align the behavior of employees with the achievement of its short- and long-term strategic goals, which revolve around client investment objectives. This is accomplished, in part, through a balanced performance assessment process and total compensation program, as well as a clearly defined culture that rigorously and consistently promotes adherence to the highest ethical standards.

In determining portfolio manager compensation, JPMorgan uses a balanced discretionary approach to assess performance against four broad categories: (1) business results; (2) risk and control; (3) customers and clients; and (4) people and leadership.

These performance categories consider short-, medium- and long-term goals that drive sustained value for clients, while accounting for risk and control objectives. Specifically, portfolio manager performance is evaluated against various factors including the following: (1) blended pre-tax investment performance relative to competitive indices, generally weighted more to the long-term; (2) individual contribution relative to the client’s risk/return objectives; and (3) adherence with JPMorgan’s compliance, risk and regulatory procedures.

Feedback from JPMorgan’s risk and control professionals is considered in assessing performance.

JPMorgan maintains a balanced total compensation program comprised of a mix of fixed compensation (including a competitive base salary and, for certain employees, a fixed cash allowance), variable compensation in the form of cash incentives, and long-term incentives in the form of equity based and/or fund-tracking incentives that vest over time. Long-term awards comprise up to 60% of overall incentive compensation, depending on an employee’s pay level.

Long-term awards are generally in the form of time-vested JPMC Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). However, portfolio managers are subject to a mandatory deferral of long-term incentive compensation under JPMorgan’s Mandatory Investor Plan (“MIP”). The MIP provides for a rate of return equal to that of the Fund(s) that the portfolio managers manage, thereby aligning portfolio manager’s pay with that of their client’s experience/return. 100% of the portfolio manager’s long-term incentive compensation is eligible for MIP with 50% allocated to the specific und(s) they manage, as determined by their respective manager. The remaining portion of the overall amount is electable and may be treated as if invested in any of the other Funds available in the plan or can take the form of RSUs.

Jennison Associates LLC (“Jennison”)

COMPENSATION. Jennison seeks to maintain a highly competitive compensation program designed to attract and retain outstanding investment professionals, which include portfolio managers and research analysts, and to align the interests of its investment professionals with those of its clients and overall firm results. Jennison recognizes individuals for their achievements and contributions and continues to promote those who exemplify the same values and level of commitment that are hallmarks of the organization. Investment professionals are compensated with a combination of base salary and discretionary cash bonus. Overall firm profitability determines the size of the investment professional compensation pool. In general, the discretionary cash bonus represents the majority of an investment professional’s compensation.

Jennison sponsors a profit sharing retirement plan for all eligible employees. The contribution to the profit sharing retirement plan for portfolio managers is based on a percentage of the portfolio manager’s total compensation, subject to a maximum determined by applicable law. In addition to eligibility to participate in retirement and welfare plans, senior investment professionals, including portfolio managers and senior research analysts, are eligible to participate in a voluntary deferred compensation program where all or a portion of the discretionary cash bonus can be deferred. Participants in the deferred compensation plan are permitted to allocate the deferred amounts among various options that track the gross-of-fee pre-tax performance of accounts or composites of accounts managed by Jennison.

S-15

Investment professionals’ total compensation is determined through a subjective process that evaluates numerous qualitative and quantitative factors. Not all factors are applicable to every investment professional, and there is no particular weighting or formula for considering the factors.

The factors reviewed for the portfolio managers are listed below.

The quantitative factors reviewed for the portfolio managers may include:

●

One-, three-, five-year and longer term pre-tax investment performance for groupings of accounts managed in the same strategy (composite) relative to market conditions, pre-determined passive indices and industry peer group data for the product strategy (e.g., large cap growth, large cap value). Some portfolio managers may manage or contribute ideas to more than one product strategy, and the performance of the other product strategies is also considered in determining the portfolio manager’s overall compensation.

●

The investment professional’s contribution to client portfolio’s pre-tax one-, three-, five-year and longer-term performance from the investment professional’s recommended stocks relative to market conditions, the strategy’s passive benchmarks, and the investment professional’s respective coverage universes.

The qualitative factors reviewed for the portfolio managers may include:

●

The quality of the portfolio manager’s investment ideas and consistency of the portfolio manager’s judgment;

●

Qualitative factors such as teamwork and responsiveness;

●

Individual factors such as years of experience and responsibilities specific to the individual’s role such as being a team leader or supervisor are also factored into the determination of an investment professional’s total compensation; and

●

Historical and long-term business potential of the product strategies.

POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Jennison manages accounts with asset-based fees alongside accounts with performance-based fees. This side-by-side management can create an incentive for Jennison and its investment professionals to favor one account over another. Specifically, Jennison has the incentive to favor accounts for which it receives performance fees, and possibly take greater investment risks in those accounts, in order to bolster performance and increase its fees.

Other types of side-by-side management of multiple accounts can also create incentives for Jennison to favor one account over another. Examples are detailed below, followed by a discussion of how Jennison addresses these conflicts.

●

Long only accounts/long-short accounts: Jennison manages accounts in strategies that only hold long securities positions as well as accounts in strategies that are permitted to sell securities short. Jennison may hold a long position in a security in some client accounts while selling the same security short in other client accounts. For example, Jennison permits quantitatively hedged strategies to short securities that are held long in other strategies. Additionally, Jennison permits securities that are held long in quantitatively derived strategies to be shorted by other strategies. The strategies that sell a security short held long by another strategy could lower the price for the security held long. Similarly, if a strategy is purchasing a security that is held short in other strategies, the strategies purchasing the security could increase the price of the security held short. By the same token, sales in a long only account can increase the value of a short position while shorting could create an opportunity to purchase a long position at a lower price. As a result, we have conflicts of interest in determining the timing and direction of investments.

●

Multiple strategies: Jennison may buy or sell, or may direct or recommend that one client buy or sell, securities of the same kind or class that are purchased or sold for another client, at prices that may be different. Jennison may also, at any time, execute trades of securities of the same kind or class in one direction for an account and in the opposite direction for another account, due to differences in investment strategy or client direction. Different strategies effecting trading in the same securities or types of securities may appear as inconsistencies in Jennison’s management of multiple accounts side-by-side.

S-16

●

Investments at different levels of an issuer’s capital structure: To the extent different clients invest across multiple strategies or asset classes, Jennison may invest client assets in the same issuer, but at different levels in the capital structure. Interests in these positions could be inconsistent or in potential or actual conflict with each other.

●

Affiliated accounts/unaffiliated accounts and seeded/nonseeded accounts and accounts receiving asset allocation assets from affiliated investment advisers: Jennison manages accounts for its affiliates and accounts in which it has an interest alongside unaffiliated accounts. Jennison could have an incentive to favor its affiliated accounts over unaffiliated accounts. Additionally, at times Jennison’s affiliates may provide initial funding or otherwise invest in vehicles managed by Jennison. When an affiliate provides “seed capital” or other capital for a fund or account, it may do so with the intention of redeeming all or part of its interest at a particular future point in time or when it deems that sufficient additional capital has been invested in that fund or account. Jennison typically requests seed capital to start a track record for a new strategy or product. Managing “seeded” accounts alongside “non-seeded” accounts can create an incentive to favor the “seeded” accounts to establish a track record for a new strategy or product. Additionally, Jennison’s affiliated investment advisers could allocate their asset allocation clients’ assets to Jennison. Jennison could have an incentive to favor accounts used by its affiliate for their asset allocation clients to receive more assets from the affiliate.

●

Non-discretionary accounts or models: Jennison provides non-discretionary model portfolios to some clients and manages other portfolios on a discretionary basis. Recommendations for some non-discretionary models that are derived from discretionary portfolios are communicated after the discretionary portfolio has traded. The non-discretionary clients could be disadvantaged if Jennison delivers the model investment portfolio to them after Jennison initiates trading for the discretionary clients. Discretionary clients could be disadvantaged if the non-discretionary clients receive their model investment portfolio and start trading before Jennison has started trading for the discretionary clients.

●

Higher fee paying accounts or products or strategies: Jennison receives more revenues from (1) larger accounts or client relationships than smaller accounts or client relationships and from (2) managing discretionary accounts than advising non-discretionary models and from (3) non-wrap fee accounts than from wrap fee accounts and from (4) charging higher fees for some strategies than others. The differences in revenue that Jennison receives could create an incentive for Jennison to favor the higher fee paying or higher revenue generating account or product or strategy over another.

●

Personal interests: The performance of one or more accounts managed by Jennison’s investment professionals is taken into consideration in determining their compensation. Jennison also manages accounts that are investment options in its employee benefit plans such as its defined contribution plans or deferred compensation arrangements and where its employees may have personally invested alongside other accounts where there is no personal interest. These factors could create an incentive for Jennison to favor the accounts where it has a personal interest over accounts where Jennison does not have a personal interest.

How Jennison Addresses These Conflicts of Interest

The conflicts of interest described above could create incentives for Jennison to favor one or more accounts or types of accounts over others in the allocation of investment opportunities, aggregation and timing of investments. Portfolios in a particular strategy with similar objectives are managed similarly to the extent possible. Accordingly, portfolio holdings and industry and sector exposure tend to be similar across a group of accounts in a strategy that have similar objectives, which tends to minimize the potential for conflicts of interest among accounts within a product strategy. While these accounts have many similarities, the investment performance of each account will be different primarily due to differences in guidelines, individual portfolio manager’s decisions, timing of investments, fees, expenses and cash flows.

Additionally, Jennison has developed policies and procedures that seek to address, mitigate and assess these conflicts of interest.

●

Jennison has adopted trade aggregation and allocation procedures that seek to treat all clients (including affiliated accounts) fairly. These policies and procedures address the allocation of limited investment opportunities, such as initial public offerings (IPOs) and new issues, the allocation of transactions across multiple accounts.

S-17

●

Jennison has policies that limit the ability to short securities in portfolios that primarily rely on its fundamental research and investment processes (fundamental portfolios) if the security is held long in other fundamental portfolios.

●

Jennison has adopted procedures to review allocations or performance dispersion between accounts with performance fees and non-performance fee based accounts and to review overlapping long and short positions among long accounts and long-short accounts.

●

Jennison has adopted a code of ethics and policies relating to personal trading.

●

Jennison has adopted a conflicts of interest policy and procedures.

●

Jennison provides disclosure of these conflicts as described in its Form ADV brochure.

PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC (“PGIM Quant”)

COMPENSATION. PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC’s (PGIM Quantitative Solutions) investment professionals are compensated through a combination of base salary, a performance-based annual cash incentive bonus and an annual long-term incentive grant. PGIM Quantitative Solutions regularly utilizes third party surveys to compare its compensation program against leading asset management firms to monitor competitiveness.

An investment professional’s incentive compensation, including both the annual cash bonus and long-term incentive grant, is largely driven by a person’s contribution to PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ goal of providing investment performance to clients consistent with portfolio objectives, guidelines and risk parameters, as well as such person’s qualitative contributions to the organization. An investment professional’s long-term incentive grant is currently divided into two components: (i) 80% of the value of the grant is subject to increase or decrease based on the performance of certain PGIM Quantitative Solutions strategies, and (ii) 20% of the value of the grant consists of restricted stock of Prudential Financial, Inc. (PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ ultimate parent company). The long-term incentive grants are subject to vesting requirements. The incentive compensation of each investment professional is not based solely or directly on the performance of a fund (or any other individual account managed by PGIM Quantitative Solutions) or the value of the assets of a fund (or any other individual account managed by PGIM Quantitative Solutions ).

The annual cash bonus pool is determined quantitatively based on two primary factors: 1) investment performance of composites representing PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ various investment strategies on a 1-year and 3-year basis relative to appropriate market peer groups and the indices against which PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ strategies are managed, and 2) business results as measured by PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ pretax income.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Like other investment advisers, PGIM Quantitative Solutions is subject to various conflicts of interest in the ordinary course of its business. PGIM Quantitative Solutions strives to identify potential risks, including conflicts of interest, that are inherent in its business, and conducts annual conflict of interest reviews. When actual or potential conflicts of interest are identified, PGIM Quantitative Solutions seeks to address such conflicts through one or more of the following methods:

●

Elimination of the conflict;

●

Disclosure of the conflict; or

●

Management of the conflict through the adoption of appropriate policies and procedures.

PGIM Quantitative Solutions follows Prudential Financial’s policies on business ethics, personal securities trading, and information barriers. PGIM Quantitative Solutions has adopted a code of ethics, allocation policies and conflicts of interest policies, among others, and has adopted supervisory procedures to monitor compliance with its policies. PGIM Quantitative Solutions cannot guarantee, however, that its policies and procedures will detect and prevent, or result in the disclosure of, each and every situation in which a conflict may arise.

Side-by-Side Management of Accounts and Related Conflicts of Interest. Side-by-side management of multiple accounts can create incentives for PGIM Quantitative Solutions to favor one account over another. Examples are detailed below, followed by a discussion of how PGIM Quantitative Solutions addresses these conflicts.

S-18

●

Asset-Based Fees vs. Performance-Based Fees; Other Fee Considerations. PGIM Quantitative Solutions manages accounts with asset-based fees alongside accounts with performance-based fees. Asset-based fees are calculated based on the value of a client’s portfolio at periodic measurement dates or over specified periods of time. Performance-based fees are generally based on a share of the total return of a portfolio, and may offer greater upside potential to PGIM Quantitative Solutions than asset-based fees, depending on how the fees are structured. This side-by-side management could create an incentive for PGIM Quantitative Solutions to favor one account over another. Specifically, PGIM Quantitative Solutions could have the incentive to favor accounts for which it receives performance fees, and possibly take greater investment risks in those accounts, in order to bolster performance and increase its fees. In addition, since fees are negotiable, one client may be paying a higher fee than another client with similar investment objectives or goals. In negotiating fees, PGIM Quantitative Solutions takes into account a number of factors including, but not limited to, the investment strategy, the size of a portfolio being managed, the relationship with the client, and the required level of service. Fees may also differ based on account type. For example, fees for commingled vehicles, including those that PGIM Quantitative Solutions subadvises, may differ from fees charged for single client accounts.

●

Long Only/Long-Short Accounts. PGIM Quantitative Solutions manages accounts that only allow it to hold securities long as well as accounts that permit short selling. PGIM Quantitative Solutions may, therefore, sell a security short in some client accounts while holding the same security long in other client accounts, creating the possibility that PGIM Quantitative Solutions is taking inconsistent positions with respect to a particular security in different client accounts.

●

Compensation/Benefit Plan Accounts/Other Investments by Investment Professionals. PGIM Quantitative Solutions manages certain funds and strategies whose performance is considered in determining long-term incentive plan benefits for certain investment professionals. Investment professionals involved in the management of those accounts in these strategies have an incentive to favor them over other accounts they manage in order to increase their compensation. Additionally, PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ investment professionals may have an interest in funds in those strategies if the funds are chosen as options in their 401(k) or deferred compensation plans offered by Prudential or if they otherwise invest in those funds directly.

●

Affiliated Accounts. PGIM Quantitative Solutions manages accounts on behalf of its affiliates as well as unaffiliated accounts. PGIM Quantitative Solutions could have an incentive to favor accounts of affiliates over others.

●

Non-Discretionary Accounts or Model Portfolios. PGIM Quantitative Solutions provides non-discretionary model portfolios to some clients and manages other portfolios on a discretionary basis. When PGIM Quantitative Solutions manages accounts on a non-discretionary basis, the investment team will typically deliver a model portfolio to a non-discretionary client at or around the same time as executive discretionary trades in the same strategy. The non-discretionary clients may be disadvantaged if PGIM Quantitative Solutions delivers the model investment portfolio to them after it initiates trading for the discretionary clients, or vice versa.

●

Large Accounts/Higher Fee Strategies. Large accounts typically generate more revenue than do smaller accounts and certain strategies have higher fees than others. As a result, a portfolio manager has an incentive when allocating investment opportunities to favor accounts that pay a higher fee or generate more income for PGIM Quantitative Solutions.

Securities of the Same Kind or Class. PGIM Quantitative Solutions sometimes buys or sells or directs or recommends that one client buy or sell, securities of the same kind or class that are purchased or sold for another client, at prices that may be different. Although such pricing differences could appear as preferences for one client over another, PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ trade execution in each case is driven by its consideration of a variety of factors as we seek the most advantageous terms reasonably attainable in the circumstances. Although such pricing differences could appear as preferences for one client over another, PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ trade execution in each case is driven by its consideration of a variety of factors as we seek the most advantageous terms reasonably attainable in the circumstances. PGIM Quantitative Solutions may also, at any time, execute trades of securities of the same kind or class in one direction for an account and in the opposite direction for another account, or not trade in any other account. Opposite way trades are generally due to differences in investment strategy, portfolio composition, or client direction.

S-19

How PGIM Quantitative Solutions Addresses These Conflicts of Interest. The conflicts of interest described above with respect to different types of side-by-side management could influence PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ allocation of investment opportunities as well as its timing, aggregation and allocation of trades. PGIM Quantitative Solutions has developed policies and procedures designed to address these conflicts of interest. PGIM Quantitative Solutions' Conflicts of Interest and related policies stress that investment decisions are to be made in accordance with the fiduciary duties owed to each account without giving consideration to PGIM Quantitative Solutions or PGIM Quantitative Solutions personnel's pecuniary, investment or other financial interests.

In keeping with its fiduciary obligations, PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ policies with respect to allocation and aggregation are to treat all of its accounts fairly and equitably over time. PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ investment strategies generally require that PGIM Quantitative Solutions invest its clients’ assets in securities that are publicly traded. PGIM Quantitative Solutions generally does not participate in initial public offerings. PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ investment strategies are team managed, reducing the likelihood that one portfolio would be favored over other portfolios managed by the team. These factors reduce the risk that PGIM Quantitative Solutions could favor one client over another in the allocation of investment opportunities. PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ compliance procedures with respect to these policies include independent reviews by its compliance unit of the timing, allocation and aggregation of trades, the allocation of investment opportunities and the performance of similarly managed accounts. These procedures are designed to detect patterns and anomalies in PGIM Quantitative Solutions side-by-side management and trading so that PGIM Quantitative Solutions may take measures to correct or improve its processes. PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ Trade Management Oversight Committee, which consists of senior members of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ management team, reviews, among other things, trading patterns, execution impact on client accounts and broker performance, on a periodic basis.

PGIM Quantitative Solutions rebalances portfolios periodically with frequencies that vary with market conditions and investment objectives and may differ across portfolios in the same strategy based on variations in portfolio characteristics and constraints. PGIM Quantitative Solutions may choose to aggregate trades for all portfolios rebalanced on any given day, where appropriate and consistent with its duty of best execution. Orders are generally allocated at the time of the transaction or as soon as possible thereafter, on a pro rata basis equal to each account’s appetite for the issue when such appetite can be determined.

With respect to PGIM Quantitative Solutions’management of long-short and long only accounts, the security weightings (positive or negative) in each account are always determined by a quantitative algorithm. An independent review is performed by the compliance unit to assess whether any such positions would represent a departure from the quantitative algorithm used to derive the positions in each portfolio. PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ review is intended to identify situations where PGIM Quantitative Solutions would seem to have conflicting views of the same security in different portfolios, although such views may actually be reasonable and consistent due to differing portfolio constraints.

PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ Relationships with Affiliates and Related Conflicts of Interest. As an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, PGIM Quantitative Solutions is part of a diversified, global financial services organization. It is affiliated with many types of U.S. and non-U.S. financial service providers, including insurance companies, broker-dealers, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators and other investment advisers. Some of its employees are officers of and/or provide services to some of these affiliates.

Conflicts Related to PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ Affiliations.

Conflicts Arising Out of Legal Restrictions. PGIM Quantitative Solutions may be restricted by law, regulation or contract as to how much, if any, of a particular security it may purchase or sell on behalf of a client, and as to the timing of such purchase or sale. Sometimes these restrictions apply as a result of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ relationship with Prudential Financial and its other affiliates. For example, PGIM Quantitative Solutions holdings of a security on behalf of its clients are required under certain regulations, to be aggregated with the holdings of that security by other Prudential Financial affiliates. These holdings could, on an aggregate basis, exceed certain reporting thresholds. Prudential tracks these aggregate holdings and PGIM Quantitative Solutions may restrict purchases, sell existing investments, or otherwise restrict, forego or limit the exercise of rights to avoid crossing such thresholds because of the potential consequences to PGIM Quantitative Solutions, Prudential or PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ clients if such thresholds are exceeded. In addition, PGIM Quantitative Solutions could receive material, non-public information with respect to a particular issuer from an affiliate and, as a result, be unable to execute purchase or sale transactions in securities of that issuer for its clients. PGIM Quantitative Solutions is generally able to avoid receiving material, non-public information from its affiliates by maintaining information barriers to prevent the transfer of information between affiliates. PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ trading of Prudential Financial common stock for its clients’ portfolios also presents a conflict of interest and, consequently, PGIM Quantitative Solutions does so only when permitted by its clients.

S-20

The Fund may be prohibited from engaging in transactions with its affiliates even when such transactions may be beneficial for the Fund. Certain affiliated transactions are permitted in accordance with procedures adopted by the Fund and reviewed by the independent board members of the Fund.

Conflicts Related to PGIM Quantitative Solutions Multi-Asset Class Services. PGIM Quantitative Solutions performs asset allocation services as subadviser for affiliated mutual funds managed or co-managed by the Investment Manager, including for some Portfolios offered by the Fund. Where, in these arrangements, PGIM Quantitative Solutions also manages underlying funds or accounts within asset classes included in the mutual fund guidelines, PGIM Quantitative Solutions will allocate assets to such underlying funds, vehicles, or accounts. In these circumstances, PGIM Quantitative Solutions receives both an asset allocation fee and a management fee. As a result, PGIM Quantitative Solutions has an incentive to allocate assets to an asset class or vehicle that it manages in order to increase its fees. To help mitigate this conflict, the compliance group reviews the asset allocation to determine that the investments were made within the established guidelines for each asset class or fund.

PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ affiliates can have an incentive to seek to influence PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ asset allocation decisions, for example to facilitate hedging or improve profit margins. Through training and the establishment of communication barriers, however, PGIM Quantitative Solutions seeks to avoid any influence by its affiliates and implements its asset allocation decisions solely in what PGIM Quantitative Solutions believes to be the best interests of the funds and in compliance with applicable guidelines. PGIM Quantitative Solutions also believes that it makes such allocations in a manner consistent with its fiduciary obligations.

In certain arrangements PGIM Quantitative Solutions subadvises mutual funds for the Investment Manager through a program where they have selected PGIM Quantitative Solutions as a manager, resulting in PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ collection of subadvisory fees from them. The Investment Manager also selects managers for some of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ asset allocation products and, in certain cases, is compensated by PGIM Quantitative Solutions for these services under service agreements. The Investment Manager and PGIM Quantitative Solutions may have a mutual incentive to continue these types of arrangements that benefit both companies. These and other types of conflicts of interest are reviewed to verify that appropriate oversight is performed.

Conflicts Related to PGIM Quantitative Solutions Financial Interests and the Financial Interests of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ Affiliates. PGIM Quantitative Solutions, Prudential Financial, Inc., The Prudential Insurance Company of America (PICA) and other affiliates of PGIM Quantitative Solutions have financial interests in, or relationships with, companies whose securities PGIM Quantitative Solutions holds, purchases or sells in its client accounts. Certain of these interests and relationships are material to PGIM Quantitative Solutions or to the Prudential enterprise. At any time, these interests and relationships could be inconsistent or in potential or actual conflict with positions held or actions taken by PGIM Quantitative Solutions on behalf of its client accounts. For example, PGIM Quantitative Solutions invests in the securities of one or more clients for the accounts of other clients. PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ affiliates sell various products and/or services to certain companies whose securities PGIM Quantitative Solutions purchases and sells for its clients. PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ affiliates hold public and private debt and equity securities of a large number of issuers. PGIM Quantitative Solutions invests in some of the same issuers for its client accounts but at different levels in the capital structure. For instance, PGIM Quantitative Solutions may invest client assets in the equity of companies whose debt is held by an affiliate. Certain of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ affiliates (as well as directors of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ affiliates) are officers or directors of issuers in which PGIM Quantitative Solutions invests from time to time. These issuers may also be service providers to PGIM Quantitative Solutions or its affiliates. In general, conflicts related to the financial interests described above are addressed by the fact that PGIM Quantitative Solutions makes investment decisions for each client independently considering the best economic interests of such client.

S-21

Certain of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ employees may offer and sell securities of, and units in, commingled funds that PGIM Quantitative Solutions manages or subadvises. Employees may offer and sell securities in connection with their roles as registered representatives of Prudential Investment Management Services LLC (a broker-dealer affiliate), or as officers, agents, or approved persons of other affiliates. There is an incentive for PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ employees to offer these securities to investors regardless of whether the investment is appropriate for such investor since increased assets in these vehicles will result in increased advisory fees to PGIM Quantitative Solutions . In addition, although sales commissions are not paid for such activities, such sales could result in increased compensation to the employee. To mitigate this conflict, PGIM Quantitative Solutions performs suitability checks on new clients as well as on an annual basis with respect to all clients.

Conflicts Related to Long-Term Compensation. A portion of the long-term incentive grant of some of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ investment professionals will increase or decrease based on the annual performance of several of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ strategies over defined time periods. Consequently, some of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ portfolio managers from time to time have financial interests in the accounts they advise. To address potential conflicts related to these financial interests, PGIM Quantitative Solutions has procedures, including supervisory review procedures, designed to verify that each of its accounts is managed in a manner that is consistent with PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ fiduciary obligations, as well as with the account’s investment objectives, investment strategies and restrictions. Specifically, PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ chief investment officer will perform a comparison of trading costs between the advised accounts whose performance is considered in connection with the long-term incentive grant and other accounts, to verify that such costs are consistent with each other or otherwise in line with expectations. The results of the analysis are discussed at a meeting of PGIM Quantitative Solutions’ Trade Management Oversight Committee.

Conflicts Related to Service Providers. PGIM Quantitative Solutions retains third party advisors and other service providers to provide various services for PGIM Quantitative Solutions as well as for funds that PGIM Quantitative Solutions manages or subadvises. A service provider may provide services to PGIM Quantitative Solutions or one of its funds while also providing services to PGIM, Inc. (PGIM) other PGIM-advised funds, or affiliates of PGIM, and may negotiate rates in the context of the overall relationship. PGIM Quantitative Solutions may benefit from negotiated fee rates offered to its funds and vice-versa. There is no assurance, however, that PGIM Quantitative Solutions will be able to obtain advantageous fee rates from a given service provider negotiated by its affiliates based on their relationship with the service provider, or that it will know of such negotiated fee rates.

Conflicts of Interest in the Voting Process. Occasionally, a conflict of interest may arise in connection with proxy voting. For example, the issuer of the securities being voted may also be a client or affiliate of PGIM Quantitative Solutions. When PGIM Quantitative Solutions identifies an actual or potential conflict of interest between PGIM Quantitative Solutions and its clients or affiliates, PGIM Quantitative Solutions votes in accordance with the policy of its proxy voting advisor rather than its own policy. In that manner, PGIM Quantitative Solutions seeks to maintain the independence and objectivity of the vote.

PGIM, Inc. (PGIM Fixed Income)

COMPENSATION. The base salary of an investment professional in the PGIM Fixed Income unit of PGIM is primarily based on market data relative to similar positions as well as the past performance, years of experience and scope of responsibility of the individual. Incentive compensation, including the annual cash bonus, the long-term equity grant and grants under PGIM Fixed Income’s long-term incentive plans, is primarily based on such person’s contribution to PGIM Fixed Income’s goal of providing investment performance to clients consistent with portfolio objectives, guidelines, risk parameters, and its compliance risk management and other policies, as well as market-based data such as compensation trends and levels of overall compensation for similar positions in the asset management industry. In addition, an investment professional’s qualitative contributions to the organization and its commercial success are considered in determining incentive compensation. Incentive compensation is not solely based on the performance of, or value of assets in, any single account or group of client accounts.

S-22

An investment professional’s annual cash bonus is paid from an annual incentive pool. The pool is developed as a percentage of PGIM Fixed Income’s operating income and the percentage used to calculate the pool may be refined by factors such as:

business initiatives;

the number of investment professionals receiving a bonus and related peer group compensation;

financial metrics of the business relative to those of appropriate peer groups; and

investment performance of portfolios: (i) relative to appropriate peer groups; and/or (ii) as measured against relevant investment indices.

Long-term compensation consists of Prudential Financial, Inc. restricted stock and grants under the long-term incentive plan and targeted long-term incentive plan. The long-term incentive plan is intended to more closely align compensation with investment performance. The targeted long-term incentive plan is intended to align the interests of certain of PGIM Fixed Income’s investment professionals with the performance of a particular long/short composite or commingled investment vehicle. Grants under the long-term incentive plan and targeted long-term incentive plan are participation interests in notional accounts with a beginning value of a specified dollar amount. For the long-term incentive plan, the value attributed to these notional accounts increases or decreases over a defined period of time based, in whole or in part (depending on the date of the grant), on the performance of investment composites representing a number of PGIM Fixed Income’s investment strategies. With respect to targeted long-term incentive awards, the value attributed to the notional accounts increases or decreases over a defined period of time based on the performance of either (i) a long/short investment composite or (ii) a commingled investment vehicle. An investment composite is an aggregation of accounts with similar investment strategies. The chief investment officer/head of PGIM Fixed Income also receives performance shares which represent the right to receive shares of Prudential Financial, Inc. common stock conditioned upon, and subject to, the achievement of specified financial performance goals by Prudential Financial, Inc.. Each of the restricted stock, grants under the long-term incentive plans, and performance shares is subject to vesting requirements.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Like other investment advisers, PGIM Fixed Income is subject to various conflicts of interest in the ordinary course of its business. PGIM Fixed Income strives to identify potential risks, including conflicts of interest, that are inherent in its business, and PGIM Fixed Income conducts annual conflict of interest reviews. However, it is not possible to identify every potential conflict that can arise. When actual or potential conflicts of interest are identified, PGIM Fixed Income seeks to address such conflicts through one or more of the following methods:

elimination of the conflict;

disclosure of the conflict; or

management of the conflict through the adoption of appropriate policies, procedures or other mitigants.

PGIM Fixed Income follows the policies of Prudential Financial, Inc. on business ethics, personal securities trading, and information barriers. PGIM Fixed Income has adopted a code of ethics, allocation policies and conflicts of interest policies, among others, and has adopted supervisory procedures to monitor compliance with its policies. PGIM Fixed Income cannot guarantee, however, that its policies and procedures will detect and prevent, or result in the disclosure of, each and every situation in which a conflict arises or could potentially arise.

Side-by-Side Management of Accounts and Related Conflicts of Interest. PGIM Fixed Income’s side-by-side management of multiple accounts can create conflicts of interest. Examples are detailed below, followed by a discussion of how PGIM Fixed Income addresses these conflicts.

Performance Fees - PGIM Fixed Income manages accounts with asset-based fees alongside accounts with performance-based fees. This side-by-side management creates an incentive for PGIM Fixed Income and its investment professionals to favor one account over another. Specifically, PGIM Fixed Income or its affiliates have an incentive to favor accounts for which PGIM Fixed Income or an affiliate receives performance fees, and possibly take greater investment risks in those accounts, in order to bolster performance and increase its fees.

Affiliated accounts - PGIM Fixed Income manages accounts on behalf of its affiliates as well as unaffiliated accounts. PGIM Fixed Income have an incentive to favor accounts of affiliates over others. Additionally, at times, PGIM Fixed Income’s affiliates provide initial funding or otherwise invest in vehicles managed by it, for example by providing “seed capital” for a fund or account. Managing “seeded” accounts alongside “non-seeded” accounts creates an incentive to favor the “seeded” accounts to establish a track record for a new strategy or product. Additionally, PGIM Fixed Income’s affiliated investment advisers from time to time allocate their asset allocation clients’ assets to PGIM Fixed Income. PGIM Fixed Income has an incentive to favor accounts used by its affiliates for their asset allocation clients to receive more assets from its affiliates.

S-23

Larger accounts/higher fee strategies - larger accounts and clients typically generate more revenue than do smaller accounts or clients and certain of PGIM Fixed Income’s strategies have higher fees than others. As a result, a portfolio manager could have an incentive when allocating scarce investment opportunities to favor accounts that pay a higher fee or generate more income for PGIM Fixed Income (or which it believes would generate more revenue in the future).

Long only and long/short accounts - PGIM Fixed Income manages accounts that only allow it to hold securities long as well as accounts that permit short selling. As a result, there are times when PGIM Fixed Income sells a security short in some client accounts while holding the same security long in other client accounts. These short sales could reduce the value of the securities held in the long only accounts. Conversely, purchases for long only accounts could have a negative impact on the short positions in long/short accounts. As a result, PGIM Fixed Income has conflicts of interest in determining the timing and direction of investments.

Securities of the same kind or class - PGIM Fixed Income sometimes buys or sells, or direct or recommend that a client buy or sell, securities of the same kind or class that are purchased or sold for another client at prices that may be different. Although such pricing differences could appear as preferences for one client over another, PGIM Fixed Income’s trade execution in each case is driven by its consideration of a variety of factors consistent with its duty to seek best execution. There are times when PGIM Fixed Income executes trades of securities of the same kind or class in one direction for an account and in the opposite direction for another account, or determine not to trade such securities in one or more accounts while trading for others. While such trades (or a decision not to trade) could appear inconsistent in how PGIM Fixed Income views or treats a security for one client versus another, they generally result from differences in investment strategy, portfolio composition or client direction.

Investment at different levels of an issuer’s capital structure— There are times when PGIM Fixed Income invests client assets in the same issuer, but at different levels in the issuer’s capital structure. This could occur, for instance, when a client holds private securities or loans of an issuer and other clients hold publicly traded securities of the same issuer. In addition, there are times when PGIM Fixed Income invest client assets in a class or tranche of securities of a securitized finance vehicle (such as a collateralized loan obligation, asset-backed security or mortgage-backed security) and also, at the same or different time, invests the assets of another client (including affiliated clients) in a different class or tranche of securities of the same vehicle. These different securities can have different voting rights, dividend or repayment priorities, rights in bankruptcy or other features that conflict with one another. For some of these securities (particularly private securitized product investments for which clients own all or a significant portion of the outstanding securities or obligations), PGIM Fixed Income has had, input regarding the characteristics and the relative rights and priorities of the various classes or tranches.

When PGIM Fixed Income invests client assets in different levels of an issuer’s capital structure, it is permitted to take actions with respect to the assets held by one client (including affiliated clients) that are potentially adverse to other clients, for example, by foreclosing on loans or by putting an issuer into default. In negotiating the terms and conditions of any such investments, or any subsequent amendments or waivers, PGIM Fixed Income could find that the interests of a client and the interests of one or more other clients (including affiliated clients) could conflict. In these situations, decisions over proxy voting, corporate reorganizations, how to exit an investment, bankruptcy matters (including, for example, whether to trigger an event of default or the terms of any workout) or other actions or inactions can result in conflicts of interest. Similarly, if an issuer in which a client and one or more other clients directly or indirectly hold different classes of securities encounters financial problems, decisions over the terms of any workout will raise conflicts of interest (including potential conflicts over proposed waivers and amendments to debt covenants). For example, a senior bond holder or lender might prefer a liquidation of the issuer in which it could be paid in full, whereas an equity or junior bond holder might prefer a reorganization that holds the potential to create value for the equity holders or junior bond holders. There will be times where PGIM Fixed Income refrains from taking certain actions (including participating in workouts and restructurings) or making investments on behalf of certain clients or where PGIM Fixed Income determine to sell investments for certain clients, in each case in order to mitigate conflicts of interest or legal, regulatory or other risks to PGIM Fixed Income This could potentially disadvantage the clients on whose behalf the actions are not taken, investments are not made, or investments are sold. Conversely, in other cases, PGIM Fixed Income will not refrain from taking such actions or making investments on behalf of some clients (including affiliated clients), which could potentially disadvantage other clients. Any of the foregoing conflicts of interest will be resolved on a case-by-case basis. Any such resolution will take into consideration the interests of the relevant clients, the circumstances giving rise to the conflict and applicable laws.

S-24

Financial interests of investment professionals - PGIM Fixed Income investment professionals from time to time invest in certain investment vehicles that it manages, including exchanged-traded funds (“ETFs”), mutual funds and (through a retirement plan) collective investment trusts. Also, certain of these investment vehicles are options under the 401(k) and deferred compensation plans offered by Prudential Financial, Inc. In addition, the value of grants under PGIM Fixed Income’s long-term incentive plan and targeted long-term incentive plan is affected by the performance of certain client accounts. As a result, PGIM Fixed Income investment professionals have financial interests in accounts managed by PGIM Fixed Income and/or that are related to the performance of certain client accounts.

Non-discretionary/limited discretion accounts - PGIM Fixed Income provides non-discretionary and limited discretion investment advice to some clients and manages others on a fully discretionary basis. Trades in non-discretionary accounts or accounts where discretion is limited could occur before, in concert with, or after PGIM Fixed Income executes similar trades in its discretionary accounts. The non-discretionary/limited discretion clients may be disadvantaged if PGIM Fixed Income delivers investment advice to them after it initiates trading for the discretionary clients, or vice versa.

How PGIM Fixed Income Addresses These Conflicts of Interest. PGIM Fixed Income has developed policies and procedures reasonably designed to address the conflicts of interest with respect to its different types of side-by-side management described above.

Each quarter, the chief investment officer/head of PGIM Fixed Income holds a series of meetings with the senior portfolio manager and team responsible for the management of each of PGIM Fixed Income’s investment strategies. At each of these quarterly investment strategy review meetings, the chief investment officer/head of PGIM Fixed Income and the strategy’s portfolio management team review and discuss the investment performance and performance attribution for each client account managed in the strategy. These meetings generally are also attended by the head of the investment risk management group or his designee and a member of the compliance group, among others.

In keeping with PGIM Fixed Income’s fiduciary obligations, its policy with respect to trade aggregation and allocation is to treat all of its client accounts fairly and equitably over time. PGIM Fixed Income’s trade management oversight committee, which generally meets quarterly, is responsible for providing oversight with respect to trade aggregation and allocation. Its compliance group periodically reviews a sampling of new issue allocations and related documentation to confirm compliance with the trade aggregation and allocation procedures. In addition, the compliance and investment risk management groups review forensic reports regarding new issue and secondary trade activity on a quarterly basis. This forensic analysis includes such data as the: (i) number of new issues allocated in the strategy; (ii) size of new issue allocations to each portfolio in the strategy; (iii) profitability of new issue transactions; (iv) portfolio turnover; (v) and metrics related to large and block trade activity. The results of these analyses are reviewed and discussed at PGIM Fixed Income’s trade management oversight committee meetings. The procedures above are designed to detect patterns and anomalies in PGIM Fixed Income’s side-by-side management and trading so that it may assess and improve its processes.

PGIM Fixed Income has procedures that specifically address its side-by-side management of certain long/short and long only portfolios. These procedures address potential conflicts that could arise from differing positions between long/short and long only portfolios. In addition, lending opportunities with respect to securities for which the market is demanding a slight premium rate over normal market rates are allocated to long only accounts prior to allocating the opportunities to long/short accounts.

S-25

Conflicts Related to PGIM Fixed Income’s Affiliations. As an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc., PGIM Fixed Income is part of a diversified, global financial services organization. PGIM Fixed Income is affiliated with many types of U.S. and non-U.S. financial service providers, including insurance companies, broker-dealers, commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators and other investment advisers. Some of its employees are officers of and/or provide services to some of these affiliates.

Conflicts Related to Investment of Client Assets in Affiliated Funds. PGIM Fixed Income invests client assets in funds that it manages or subadvises for one or more affiliates. PGIM Fixed Income also invests cash collateral from securities lending transactions in some of these funds. These investments benefit both PGIM Fixed Income and its affiliate through increasing assets under management and fees.

Conflicts Related to Referral Fees to Affiliates. From time to time, PGIM Fixed Income has arrangements where PGIM Fixed Income compensates affiliated parties for client referrals. PGIM Fixed Income currently has arrangements with an affiliated entity which provide for payments to an affiliate if certain investments by others are made in certain of PGIM Fixed Income’s products or if PGIM Fixed Income establishes certain other advisory relationships. These investments benefit both PGIM Fixed Income and its affiliates through increasing assets under management and fees.

Conflicts Related to Co-investment by Affiliates. PGIM Fixed Income affiliates provide initial funding to or otherwise invest in certain vehicles it manages. When certain of its affiliates provide “seed capital” or other capital for a fund, they generally do so with the intention of redeeming all or part of their interest at a future point in time or when they deem that sufficient additional capital has been invested in that fund.

The timing of a redemption by an affiliate could benefit the affiliate. For example, the fund may be more liquid at the time of the affiliate’s redemption than it is at times when other investors may wish to withdraw all or part of their interests.

In addition, a consequence of any withdrawal of a significant amount, including by an affiliate, is that investors remaining in the fund will bear a proportionately higher share of fund expenses following the redemption.

PGIM Fixed Income could also face a conflict if the interests of an affiliated investor in a fund it manages diverge from those of the fund or other investors. For example, PGIM Fixed Income affiliates, from time to time, hedge some or all of the risks associated with their investments in certain funds PGIM Fixed Income manages. PGIM Fixed Income may provide assistance in connection with this hedging activity.

Insurance Affiliate General Accounts. Because of the substantial size of the general accounts of PGIM Fixed Income’s affiliated insurance companies (the “Insurance Affiliates”), trading by these general accounts, including PGIM Fixed Income’s trades on behalf of the accounts, may affect the market prices or limit the availability of the securities or instruments transacted. Although PGIM Fixed Income does not expect that the general accounts of affiliated insurers will execute transactions that will move a market frequently, and generally only in response to unusual market or issuer events, the execution of these transactions could have an adverse effect on transactions for or positions held by other clients.

PGIM Fixed Income believes that the conflicts related to its affiliations described above are mitigated by its allocation policies and procedures, its supervisory review of accounts and its procedures with respect to side-by-side management, including of long only and long/short accounts.

Conflicts Related to Financial Interests and the Financial Interests of Affiliates

Prudential Financial, the general accounts of the Insurance Affiliates, PGIM Fixed Income and other affiliates of PGIM at times have financial interests in, or relationships with, companies whose securities or related instruments PGIM Fixed Income holds, purchases or sells in its client accounts. Certain of these interests and relationships are material to PGIM Fixed Income or to the Prudential enterprise. At any time, these interests and relationships could be inconsistent or in potential or actual conflict with positions held or actions taken by PGIM Fixed Income on behalf of PGIM Fixed Income’s client accounts. For example:

PGIM Fixed Income invests in the securities of one or more clients for the accounts of other clients.

PGIM Fixed Income’s affiliates sell various products and/or services to certain companies whose securities PGIM Fixed Income purchases and sells for PGIM Fixed Income clients.

PGIM Fixed Income invests in the debt securities of companies whose equity is held by its affiliates.

PGIM Fixed Income’s affiliates hold public and private debt and equity securities of a large number of issuers. PGIM Fixed Income invests in some of the same issuers for other client accounts but at different levels in the capital structure. For example:

S-26

Affiliated accounts have held and can in the future hold the senior debt of an issuer whose subordinated debt is held by PGIM Fixed Income’s clients or hold secured debt of an issuer whose public unsecured debt is held in client accounts. See “Investment at different levels of an issuer’s capital structure” above for additional information regarding conflicts of interest resulting from investment at different levels of an issuer’s capital structure.

To the extent permitted by applicable law, PGIM Fixed Income can also invest client assets in offerings of securities the proceeds of which are used to repay debt obligations held in affiliated accounts or other client accounts. PGIM Fixed Income’s interest in having the debt repaid creates a conflict of interest. PGIM Fixed Income has adopted a refinancing policy to address this conflict.

Certain of PGIM Fixed Income’s affiliates’ directors or officers are directors, or officers of issuers in which PGIM Fixed Income invests from time to time. These issuers could also be service providers to PGIM Fixed Income or its affiliates.

In addition, PGIM Fixed Income can invest client assets in securities backed by commercial mortgage loans that were originated or are serviced by an affiliate.

In general, conflicts related to the financial interests described above are addressed by the fact that PGIM Fixed Income makes investment decisions for each client independently considering the best economic interests of such client, under the circumstances.

Conflicts Arising Out of Legal and Regulatory Restrictions.

At times, PGIM Fixed Income is restricted by law, regulation, executive order, contract or other constraints as to how much, if any, of a particular security it can purchase or sell on behalf of a client, and as to the timing of such purchase or sale. Sometimes these restrictions apply as a result of its relationship with Prudential Financial and other affiliates. For example, PGIM Fixed Income does not purchase securities issued by Prudential Financial or other affiliates for client accounts.

In certain instances, PGIM Fixed Income’s ability to buy or sell or transact will be constrained as a result of its receipt of material, non-public information, various insider trading laws and related legal requirements. For example, PGIM Fixed Income would generally be unable to (i) invest in, (ii) divest securities of or (iii) share investment analysis regarding companies for which it possesses material, non-public information, and such inability (which could last for an uncertain period of time until the information is no longer deemed material or non-public) can result in it being unable buy, sell or transact for one or more client accounts or to take other actions that would otherwise be to the benefit of one or more clients).

PGIM Fixed Income faces conflicts of interest in determining whether to accept material, non-public information. For example, PGIM Fixed Income has sought with respect to the management of investments in certain loans for clients, to retain the ability to purchase and sell other securities in the borrower’s capital structure by remaining “public” on the loan. In such cases, PGIM Fixed Income will seek to avoid receiving material, non-public information about the borrowers to which an account can or expects to lend or has lent (through assignments, participations or otherwise), which could place an account at an information disadvantage relative to other accounts and lenders. Conversely, PGIM Fixed Income has chosen to receive material, non-public information about certain borrowers for its clients that invest in bank loans, which has restricted its ability to trade in other securities of the borrowers for its clients that invest in corporate bonds.

PGIM Fixed Income’s holdings of a security on behalf of its clients are required, under certain regulations, to be aggregated with the holdings of that security by other Prudential Financial affiliates. These holdings could, on an aggregate basis, exceed certain reporting or ownership thresholds. These aggregated holdings are centrally tracked and PGIM Fixed Income or Prudential Financial can choose to restrict purchases, sell existing positions, or otherwise restrict, forgo, or limit the exercise of rights to avoid crossing such thresholds because of the potential consequences to PGIM Fixed Income or Prudential Financial if such thresholds are exceeded.

Conflicts Related to Investment Consultants. Many of PGIM Fixed Income’s clients and prospective clients retain investment consultants (including discretionary investment managers and OCIO providers) to advise them on the selection and review of investment managers (including with respect to the selection of investment funds). PGIM Fixed Income has dealings with these investment consultants in their roles as discretionary managers or non-discretionary advisers to their clients. PGIM Fixed Income also has independent business relationships with investment consultants.

S-27

PGIM Fixed Income provides investment consultants with information about accounts that it manages for the consultant’s clients (and similarly, PGIM Fixed Income provides information about funds in which such clients are invested), in each case pursuant to authorization from the clients. PGIM Fixed Income also provides information regarding its investment strategies to investment consultants, who use that information in connection with searches that they conduct for their clients. PGIM Fixed Income often responds to requests for proposals in connection with those searches.

Other interactions PGIM Fixed Income has with investment consultants include the following:

it provides advisory services to the proprietary accounts of investment consultants and/or their affiliates, and advisory services to funds offered by investment consultants and/or their affiliates;

it invites investment consultants to events or other entertainment hosted by PGIM Fixed Income;

it purchases software applications, market data, access to databases, technology services and other products or services from certain investment consultants; and

it sometimes pays for the opportunity to participate in conferences organized by investment consultants.

PGIM Fixed Income will provide clients with information about its relationship with the client’s investment consultant upon request. In general, PGIM Fixed Income relies on the investment consultant to make the appropriate disclosure to its clients of any conflict that the investment consultant believes to exist due to its business relationships with PGIM Fixed Income.

A client’s relationship with an investment consultant could result in restrictions in the eligible securities or trading counterparties for the client’s account. For example, accounts of certain clients (including clients that are subject to ERISA) can be restricted from investing in securities issued by the client’s consultant or its affiliates and from trading with, or participating in transactions involving, counterparties that are affiliated with the investment consultant. In some cases, these restrictions could have a material impact on account performance.

Conflicts Related to Service Providers. PGIM Fixed Income retains third party advisors and other service providers to provide various services for PGIM Fixed Income as well as for funds that PGIM Fixed Income manages or subadvises. Some service providers provide services to PGIM Fixed Income or one of PGIM Fixed Income’s funds while also providing services to other PGIM units, other PGIM-advised funds, or affiliates of PGIM, and negotiate rates in the context of the overall relationship. PGIM Fixed Income can benefit from negotiated fee rates offered to its funds and vice versa. There is no assurance, however, that PGIM Fixed Income will be able to obtain advantageous fee rates from a given service provider negotiated by its affiliates based on their relationship with the service provider, or that PGIM Fixed Income will know of such negotiated fee rates.

Conflicts Related to Valuation and Fees.

When client accounts hold illiquid or difficult to value investments, PGIM Fixed Income faces a conflict of interest when making recommendations regarding the value of such investments since its fees are generally based on the value of assets under management. PGIM Fixed Income could be viewed as having an incentive to value investments at higher valuations. PGIM Fixed Income believes that its valuation policies and procedures mitigate this conflict effectively and enable it to value client assets fairly and in a manner that is consistent with the client’s best interests. In addition, separately managed account clients often calculate fees based on the valuation of assets provided by their custodian or administrator.

Conflicts Related to Securities Lending and Reverse Repurchase Fees.

When PGIM Fixed Income manages a client account and also serves as securities lending agent or engages in reverse repurchase transactions for the account, PGIM Fixed Income is compensated for its securities lending and reverse repurchase services by receiving a portion of the proceeds generated from the securities lending and reverse repurchase activities of the account. PGIM Fixed Income could, therefore, be considered to have an incentive to invest in securities that would generate higher securities lending and reverse repurchase returns, even if these investments were not otherwise in the best interest of the client account. In addition, if PGIM Fixed Income is acting as lending agent and providing reverse repurchase services, PGIM Fixed Income may be incented to select the less costly alternative to increase its revenues.

S-28

Conflicts Related to Long-Term Compensation. As a result of the long-term incentive plan and targeted long-term incentive plan, PGIM Fixed Income’s portfolio managers from time to time have financial interests related to the investment performance of some, but not all, of the accounts they manage. For example, the performance of some client accounts is not reflected in the calculation of changes in the value of participation interests under PGIM Fixed Income’s long-term incentive plan. This may be because the composite representing the strategy in which the account is managed is not one of the composites included in the calculation or because the account is excluded from a specified composite due to guideline restrictions or other factors. In addition, the performance of only a small number of its investment strategies is covered under PGIM Fixed Income’s targeted long-term incentive plan. To address potential conflicts related to these financial interests, PGIM Fixed Income has procedures, including trade allocation and supervisory review procedures, designed to confirm that each of its client accounts is managed in a manner that is consistent with PGIM Fixed Income’s fiduciary obligations, as well as with the account’s investment objectives, investment strategies and restrictions. For example, PGIM Fixed Income’s chief investment officer/head reviews performance among similarly managed accounts on a quarterly basis during a series of meetings with the senior portfolio manager and team responsible for the management of each investment strategy. These quarterly investment strategy review meetings generally are also attended by the head of the investment risk management group or his designee and a member of the compliance group, among others.

Conflicts Related to the Offer and Sale of Securities. Certain of PGIM Fixed Income’s employees offer and sell securities of, and interests in, commingled funds that it manages or subadvises. Employees offer and sell securities in connection with their roles as registered representatives of an affiliated broker-dealer, officers of an affiliated trust company, agents of the Insurance Affiliates, approved persons of an affiliated investment adviser or other roles related to such commingled funds. There is an incentive for PGIM Fixed Income’s employees to offer these securities to investors regardless of whether the investment is appropriate for such investor since increased assets in these vehicles will result in increased advisory fees to it. In addition, such sales could result in increased compensation to the employee.

Conflicts Related to Trading – Personal Trading by Employees. Personal trading by PGIM Fixed Income employees creates a conflict when they are trading the same securities or types of securities as PGIM Fixed Income trades on behalf of its clients. This conflict is mitigated by PGIM Fixed Income’s personal trading standards and procedures.

Conflicts Related to Outside Business Activity. From time to time, certain of PGIM Fixed Income employees or officers engage in outside business activity, including outside directorships. Any outside business activity is subject to prior approval pursuant to PGIM Fixed Income’s personal conflicts of interest and outside business activities policy. Actual and potential conflicts of interest are analyzed during such approval process. PGIM Fixed Income could be restricted in trading the securities of certain issuers in client portfolios in the unlikely event that an employee or officer, as a result of outside business activity, obtains material, non-public information regarding an issuer.

Wellington Management Company LLP (“Wellington”)

Portfolio Manager Compensation

Wellington Management receives a fee based on the assets under management of each Portfolio as set forth in the Investment Subadvisory Agreement between Wellington Management and the Manager on behalf of each Portfolio. Wellington Management pays its investment professionals out of its total revenues, including the advisory fees earned with respect to a Portfolio. The following information is as of December 31, 2021.

Wellington Management’s compensation structure is designed to attract and retain high-caliber investment professionals necessary to deliver high quality investment management services to its clients. Wellington Management’s compensation of each Fund’s managers listed in the prospectus who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of a Portfolio (the “Investment Professional”) includes a base salary and incentive components. The base salary for each Investment Professional who is a partner (a “Partner”) of Wellington Management Group LLP, the ultimate holding company of Wellington Management, is generally a fixed amount that is determined by the managing partners of Wellington Management Group LLP. The base salary for the other Investment Professionals is determined by the Investment Professionals’ experience and performance in their role as an Investment Professional. Base salaries for Wellington Management’s employees are reviewed annually and may be adjusted based on the recommendation of an Investment Professional’s manager, using guidelines established by Wellington Management's Compensation Committee, which has final oversight responsibility for base salaries of employees of the firm. Each Investment Professional, with the exception of Sullivan, Thomas and Isch, is eligible to receive an incentive payment based on the revenues earned by Wellington Management from the Fund managed by the Investment Professional and generally each other account managed by such Investment Professional. The Investment Professional's incentive payment relating to the Fund is linked to the gross pre-tax performance of the Fund managed by the Investment Professional compared to the benchmark index and/or peer group identified below over one, three, and five year periods, with an emphasis on five year results. Wellington Management applies similar incentive compensation structures (although the benchmarks or peer groups, time periods and rates may differ) to other accounts managed by the Investment Professional, including accounts with performance fees.

S-29

Portfolio-based incentives across all accounts managed by an investment professional can, and typically do, represent a significant portion of an investment professional's overall compensation; incentive compensation varies significantly by individual and can vary significantly from year to year. The Investment Professionals may also be eligible for bonus payments based on their overall contribution to Wellington Management’s business operations. Senior management at Wellington Management may reward individuals as it deems appropriate based on other factors. Each Partner is eligible to participate in a Partner-funded tax qualified retirement plan, the contributions to which are made pursuant to an actuarial formula. Messrs. Chally, Garabedian, Goodman, Hand, Illfelder, Marvan, McLane, Reckmeyer, Sullivan and Thomas are Partners.

Portfolio	Benchmark Index and/or Peer Group for Incentive Period
AST Mid-Cap Value Portfolio	Russell 2500 Value Index
AST Small Cap Growth Opportunities Portfolio	Russell 2000 Growth Index
AST Global Bond Portfolio	Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Hedged to USD

Potential Conflicts

Individual investment professionals at Wellington Management manage multiple accounts for multiple clients. These accounts may include mutual funds, separate accounts (assets managed on behalf of institutions, such as pension funds, insurance companies, foundations, or separately managed account programs sponsored by financial intermediaries), bank common trust accounts, and hedge funds. A Portfolio’s managers listed in the prospectus who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of a Portfolio (“Investment Professionals”) generally manage accounts in several different investment styles. These accounts may have investment objectives, strategies, time horizons, tax considerations and risk profiles that differ from those of a Portfolio. The Investment Professionals make investment decisions for each account, including a Portfolio, based on the investment objectives, policies, practices, benchmarks, cash flows, tax and other relevant investment considerations applicable to that account. Consequently, the Investment Professionals may purchase or sell securities, including IPOs, for one account and not another account, and the performance of securities purchased for one account may vary from the performance of securities purchased for other accounts. Alternatively, these accounts may be managed in a similar fashion to a Portfolio and thus the accounts may have similar, and in some cases nearly identical, objectives, strategies and/or holdings to that of a Portfolio.

An Investment Professional or other investment professionals at Wellington Management may place transactions on behalf of other accounts that are directly or indirectly contrary to investment decisions made on behalf of a Portfolio, or make investment decisions that are similar to those made for a Portfolio, both of which have the potential to adversely impact a Portfolio depending on market conditions. For example, an investment professional may purchase a security in one account while appropriately selling that same security in another account. Similarly, an Investment Professional may purchase the same security for a Portfolio and one or more other accounts at or about the same time. In those instances the other accounts will have access to their respective holdings prior to the public disclosure of a Portfolio’s holdings. In addition, some of these accounts have fee structures, including performance fees, which are or have the potential to be higher, in some cases significantly higher, than the fees Wellington Management receives for managing a Portfolio. Messrs. Chally, Garabedian, Hand, Illfelder, Isch, McLane, Meyi, Siegle, Sullivan and Thomas also manage accounts which pay performance allocations to Wellington Management or its affiliates. Because incentive payments paid by Wellington Management to the Investment Professionals are tied to revenues earned by Wellington Management and, where noted, to the performance achieved by the manager in each account, the incentives associated with any given account may be significantly higher or lower than those associated with other accounts managed by a given Investment Professional. Finally, the Investment Professionals may hold shares or investments in the other pooled investment vehicles and/or other accounts identified above.

S-30

Wellington Management’s goal is to meet its fiduciary obligation to treat all clients fairly and provide high quality investment services to all of its clients. Wellington Management has adopted and implemented policies and procedures, including brokerage and trade allocation policies and procedures, which it believes address the conflicts associated with managing multiple accounts for multiple clients. In addition, Wellington Management monitors a variety of areas, including compliance with primary account guidelines, the allocation of IPOs, and compliance with the firm’s Code of Ethics, and places additional investment restrictions on investment professionals who manage hedge funds and certain other accounts. Furthermore, senior investment and business personnel at Wellington Management periodically review the performance of Wellington Management’s investment professionals. Although Wellington Management does not track the time an investment professional spends on a single account, Wellington Management does periodically assess whether an investment professional has adequate time and resources to effectively manage the investment professional’s various client mandates.

S-31

PART C

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 15. Indemnification

Section 5.2 of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust provides as follows:

The Trust shall indemnify each of its Trustees, Trustees Emeritus, officers, employees, and agents (including persons who serve at its request as directors, officers, employees, agents or trustees of another organization in which it has any interest as a shareholder, creditor or otherwise) against all liabilities and expenses (including amounts paid in satisfaction of judgments, in compromise, as fines and penalties, and as counsel fees) reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or disposition of any action, suit or other proceeding, whether civil or criminal, in which he may be involved or with which he may be threatened, while in office or thereafter, by reason of his being or having been such a trustee, trustee emeritus, officer, employee or agent, except with respect to any matter as to which he shall have been adjudicated to be liable to the Trust or its Shareholders by reason of having acted in bad faith, willful misfeasance, gross negligence or reckless disregard of his duties; provided, however, that as to any matter disposed of by a compromise payment by such person, pursuant to a consent decree or otherwise, no indemnification either for said payment or for any other expenses shall be provided unless approved as in the best interests of the Trust, after notice that it involves such indemnification, by at least a majority of the disinterested Trustees acting on the matter (provided that a majority of the disinterested Trustees then in office act on the matter) upon a determination, based upon a review of readily available facts, that (i) such person acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that his or her action was in the best interests of the Trust and (ii) is not liable to the Trust or the Shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of duties; or the trust shall have received a written opinion from independent legal counsel approved by the Trustees to the effect that (x) if the matter of good faith and reasonable belief as to the best interests of the Trust, had been adjudicated, it would have been adjudicated in favor of such person, and (y) based upon a review of readily available facts such trustee, officer, employee or agent did not engage in willful misfeasance, gross negligence or reckless disregard of duty. The rights accruing to any Person under these provisions shall not exclude any other right to which he may be lawfully entitled; provided that no Person may satisfy any right of indemnity or reimbursement granted herein or in Section 5.1 or to which he may be otherwise entitled except out of the property of the Trust, and no Shareholder shall be personally liable to any Person with respect to any claim for indemnity or reimbursement or otherwise. The Trustees may make advance payments in connection with indemnification under this Section 5.2, provided that the indemnified person shall have given a written undertaking to reimburse the Trust in the event it is subsequently determined that he is not entitled to such indemnification and, provided further, that the Trust shall have obtained protection, satisfactory in the sole judgment of the disinterested Trustees acting on the matter (provided that a majority of the disinterested Trustees then in office act on the matter), against losses arising out of such advance payments or such Trustees, or independent legal counsel, in a written opinion, shall have determined, based upon a review of readily available facts that there is reason to believe that such person will be found to be entitled to such indemnification.

With respect to liability of the Manager to Registrant or to shareholders of Registrant’s Portfolios under the Investment Management Agreements, reference is made to Section 13 or 14 of each form of Investment Management Agreement filed herewith or incorporated by reference herein.

With respect to the Subadvisers’ indemnification of the Manager and its affiliated and controlling persons, and the Manager’s indemnification of each subadviser and its affiliated and controlling persons, reference is made to Section 14 of each form of Subadvisory Agreement filed herewith or incorporated by reference herein. Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to trustees, trustees emeritus, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant or expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, trustee emeritus, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, trustee emeritus, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

ITEM 16. Exhibits

(1)(a) Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Registrant. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 57 to Registrant’s Registration Statement for Form N-1A (File Nos. 33-24962 and 811-5186) (the “Registration Statement”), which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on February 27, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(1)(b) Amendment to Declaration of Trust of Registrant. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 62 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 26, 2007, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(2) By-laws of Registrant. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 50 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on February 18, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(3) None

(4) The form of Plan of Reorganization for the reorganization of the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio and AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio, each a series of the Trust, is included as Exhibit A to the combined Prospectus and Proxy Statement contained in this Registration Statement on Form N-14.

(5) None.

(6)(a) Investment Management Agreement among the Registrant, American Skandia Investment Services, Incorporated (now known as AST Investment Services, Inc.) and Prudential Investments LLC (now known as PGIM Investments LLC) for the various portfolios of the Registrant. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 49 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 30, 2004, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(6)(b) Amendment to Investment Management Agreement, among the Registrant, PGIM Investments LLC and AST Investments Services, dated February 22, 2021. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 182 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 15, 2021, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(6)(c)(i) Contractual investment management fee waivers and/or contractual expense caps for selected AST portfolios. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 187 to the Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 14, 2022, and is incorporate herein by reference.

(6)(c)(ii) Contractual expense caps for the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio. Filed herewith.

(6)(d)(1) Subadvisory Agreement among AST Investment Services, Inc., PGIM Investments LLC and PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC, PGIM, Inc. and PGIM Limited for the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio. Filed herewith.

(6)(d)(2)Subadvisory Agreement among AST Investment Services, Inc., PGIM Investments LLC and Wellington Management Company LLP for the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio. Filed herewith.

(6)(d)(3) Subadvisory Agreement among AST Investment Services, Inc., PGIM Investments LLC and each of QMA LLC (now known as PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC), Jennison Associates LLC, and PGIM, Inc. for the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 184 to the Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on December 15, 2021, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(6)(d)(4) Subadvisory Agreement among AST Investment Services, Inc., PGIM Investments LLC and Massachusetts Financial Services Company for the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 184 to the Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on December 15, 2021, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(6)(d)(5) Subadvisory Agreement among AST Investment Services, Inc., PGIM Investments LLC and Wellington Management Company LLP for the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 184 to the Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on December 15, 2021, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(6)(d)(6) Subadvisory Agreement among AST Investment Services, Inc., PGIM Investments LLC and J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. for the AST Balanced Asset Allocation Portfolio. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 184 to the Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on December 21, 2021, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(7)(a) Distribution Agreement for the shares of each Portfolio of the Registrant, between Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc. and the Registrant. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 187 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 14, 2022, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(7)(b) Sales Agreement between Registrant and American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation. Filed as an Exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 25 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on March 2, 1998, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(7)(c) Sales Agreement between Registrant and Kemper Investors Life Insurance Company. Filed as an Exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 20 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on December 24, 1996, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(8) None.

(9)(a) Custodian Agreement dated July 1, 2005 between the Registrant and PFPC Trust Company. Filed as an Exhibit to Post- Effective Amendment No. 58 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 28, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(9)(b) Custody Agreement between the Registrant and The Bank of New York dated November 7, 2002, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (g)(1) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 27 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A of Dryden Municipal Bond Fund (now Prudential Investment Portfolios 4) filed via EDGAR on June 29, 2005 (File No. 33-10649).

(9)(c) Amendment to the Custody Agreement between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon. Filed as an exhibit to Post- Effective Amendment No. 184 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on December 15, 2021, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(10) Shareholder Services and Distribution Plan. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 187 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 14, 2022, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(11) Opinion and Consent of Goodwin Procter LLP, counsel for Registrant. Filed herewith.

(12) Form of Opinion and Consent of Goodwin Procter LLP, counsel to Registrant, supporting tax matters and consequences to shareholders. Filed herewith.

(13)(a)(1) Amended and Restated Transfer Agency and Service Agreement between the Registrant and Prudential Mutual Fund Services, Inc., dated May 29, 2007. Incorporated by reference to the Dryden Municipal Bond Fund (now Prudential Investment Portfolios 4) Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A filed via EDGAR on June 29, 2007 (File No. 33-10649).

(13)(a)(2) Amendment to the Amended and Restated Transfer Agency and Service Agreement dated May 29, 2007. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 181 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on December 15, 2020, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(13)(b) Service Agreement between American Skandia Investment Services, Incorporated and Kemper Investors Life Insurance Company. Filed as an Exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on February 28, 1997, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(13)(c) Amended and Restated Participation Agreement dated June 8, 2005 among American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation (now Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation), American Skandia Trust (now Advanced Series Trust), American Skandia Investment Services, Incorporated (now AST Investment Services, Inc.), Prudential Investments LLC (now known as PGIM Investments LLC), American Skandia Marketing, Inc. (now Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc.), and Prudential Investment Management Services LLC. Filed as an Exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form N-14, which was filed via EDGAR on July 12, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(13)(d) Amendment dated February 25, 2013 to the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement dated June 8, 2005 among Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation, Advanced Series Trust, AST Investment Services, Inc., Prudential Investments LLC (now known as PGIM Investments LLC), Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc. and Prudential Investment Management Services LLC. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 116 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 18, 2013, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(13)(e) Amended and Restated Participation Agreement dated June 8, 2005 among Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, American Skandia Trust (now Advanced Series Trust), American Skandia Investment Services, Incorporated (now AST Investment Services, Inc.)., Prudential Investments LLC (now known as PGIM Investments LLC), American Skandia Marketing, Inc. (now Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc.), and Prudential Investment Management Services LLC. Filed as an Exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form N-14, which was filed via EDGAR on July 12, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(13)(f) Amendment dated February 25, 2013 to the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement dated June 8, 2005 among Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, Advanced Series Trust, AST Investment Services, Inc., Prudential Investments LLC (now known as PGIM Investments LLC), Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc., and Prudential Investment Management Services LLC. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 116 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 18, 2013, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(13)(g) Amended and Restated Participation Agreement dated June 8, 2005 among Pruco Life Insurance Company, American Skandia Trust (now Advanced Series Trust), American Skandia Investment Services, Incorporated (now AST Investment Services, Inc.), Prudential Investments LLC (now known as PGIM Investments LLC), American Skandia Marketing, Inc. (now Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc.), and Prudential Investment Management Services LLC. Filed as an Exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form N-14, which was filed via EDGAR on July 12, 2005, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(13)(h) Amendment dated February 25, 2013 to the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement dated June 8, 2005 among Pruco Life Insurance Company, Advanced Series Trust, AST Investment Services, Inc., Prudential Investments LLC (now known as PGIM Investments LLC), Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc., and Prudential Investment Management Services LLC. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 116 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 18, 2013, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(13)(i) Participation Agreement among Pramerica of Bermuda Insurance Company, American Skandia Trust (now Advanced Series Trust), American Skandia Investment Services, Inc. (now AST Investment Services, Inc.), Prudential Investments LLC (now known as PGIM Investments LLC), American Skandia Marketing, Inc. (now Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc.), and Prudential Investment Management Services LLC. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 74 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 23, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(13)(j) Participation Agreement among Prudential Retirement Insurance & Annuity Company, Advanced Series Trust, Prudential Investments LLC (now known as PGIM Investments LLC) and AST Investment Services, Inc. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 116 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 18, 2013, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(13)(k) Participation Agreement among the Prudential Insurance Company of America, Advanced Series Trust, Prudential Investments LLC (now known as PGIM Investments LLC) and AST Investment Services, Inc. Filed as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 116 to Registration Statement, which Amendment was filed via EDGAR on April 18, 2013, and is incorporated herein by reference.

(14) Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Filed herewith.

(15) None.

(16) Power of Attorney. Filed herewith.

(17) Form of voting instruction card. Filed herewith.

ITEM 17. Undertakings

(1) The undersigned registrant agrees that prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered through the use of a prospectus which is a part of this registration statement by any person or party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c) of the Securities Act [17 CFR 230.145c], the reoffering prospectus will contain the information called for by the applicable registration form for the reofferings by persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the information called for by the other items of the applicable form.

(2) The undersigned registrant agrees that every prospectus that is filed under paragraph (1) above will be filed as a part of an amendment to the registration statement and will not be used until the amendment is effective, and that, in determining any liability under the 1933 Act, each post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement for the securities offered therein, and the offering of the securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering of them.

SIGNATURES

As required by the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this Registration Statement has been signed on behalf of the Registrant, in the City of Newark and State of New Jersey, on the 26th^th day of August, 2022.

	ADVANCED SERIES TRUST

	/s/ Timothy Cronin
	Timothy Cronin*
	Senior Vice President

Signature		Title	Date

/s/ *Timothy S. Cronin		President and Principal Executive Officer
Timothy S. Cronin

/s/ * Susan Davenport Austin		Trustee
Susan Davenport Austin

/s/ * Sherry S. Barrat		Trustee
Sherry S. Barrat

/s/ * Jessica M. Bibliowicz		Trustee
Jessica M. Bibliowicz

/s/ * Kay Ryan Booth		Trustee
Kay Ryan Booth

/s/ * Stephen M. Chipman		Trustee
Stephen M. Chipman

/s/ * Robert F. Gunia		Trustee
Robert F. Gunia

/s/ * Thomas M. O’Brien		Trustee
Thomas M. O’Brien

/s/ * Christian J. Kelly		Treasurer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Christian J. Kelly

*By:	/s/ Melissa Gonzalez	Attorney-in-Fact	August 26, 2022

* Pursuant to Powers of Attorney filed herein as Exhibit.

Exhibits

Table of Contents

Exhibit Number		Description

(6)(c)(ii)		Contractual expense caps for the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio.

(6)(d)(1)		Subadvisory Agreement among AST Investment Services, Inc., PGIM Investments LLC and PGIM Quantitative Solutions LLC, PGIM, Inc. and PGIM Limited for the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio.

(6)(d)(2)		Subadvisory Agreement among AST Investment Services, Inc., PGIM Investments LLC and Wellington Management Company LLP for the AST Moderate Multi-Asset Portfolio.

(11)		Opinion and Consent of Goodwin Procter LLP, counsel for Registrant.

(12)		Form of Opinion & Consent of Goodwin Procter LLP, counsel to the Registrant, supporting tax matters and consequences to shareholders.

(14)		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC, of The Advanced Series Trust.

(16)		Power of Attorney.

(17)		Form of voting instruction card.