Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified			9 Months Ended			12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2014 ACP [Member]	Sep. 30, 2014 SB Decking [Member]	Sep. 30, 2014 VAT, Total [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 VAT, Total [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 VAT Settlement One [Member]	Dec. 31, 2010 VAT Settlement Two [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 VAT Assessment Three [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Gain (Loss) Related to Litigation Settlement						$ 4,132	$ 3,901	$ 231
Loss Contingency, Range of Possible Loss, Minimum	171		425		0
Loss Contingency, Range of Possible Loss, Maximum		205	1,050		7,800
P-2 Well Operation Range Estimate			fifteen months to three years.
Loss Contingency Period Increase, High End			a year and three quarters
Loss Contingency Period Increase, Low End			a year
Loss Contingency, Estimate of Possible Loss				$ 2,700					$ 796
Loss Contingency, Settlement Agreement, Terms				In response, two of the three carriers entered into separate settlement and release agreements with the subsidiary in late 2005 and early 2007 for $15,000 and $20,000, respectively. The proceeds of both settlements are restricted and can only be used to pay claims and costs of defense associated with the subsidiary’s asbestos litigation. During the third quarter of 2007, the subsidiary and the remaining primary insurance carrier entered into a Claim Handling and Funding Agreement, under which the carrier will pay 27% of defense and indemnity costs incurred by or on behalf of the subsidiary in connection with asbestos bodily injury claims for a minimum of five years beginning July 1, 2007. The agreement continues until terminated and can only be terminated by either party by providing the other party with a minimum of two years prior written notice. As of September 30, 2014, no notice of termination has been given under this agreement. At the end of the term of the agreement, the subsidiary may choose to again pursue its claim against this insurer regarding the application of the policy limits.
Percentage of Potential Exposure Represented by One Jurisdiction					84.00%