N-CSR 1 a_moneymarket.htm PUTNAM MONEY MARKET FUND a_moneymarket.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES




Investment Company Act file number: (811-02608)
Exact name of registrant as specified in charter: Putnam Money Market Fund
Address of principal executive offices: One Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Name and address of agent for service: Beth S. Mazor, Vice President
One Post Office Square
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Copy to:         John W. Gerstmayr, Esq.
Ropes & Gray LLP
800 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02199-3600
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 292-1000
Date of fiscal year end: September 30, 2011
Date of reporting period: October 1, 2010 — September 30, 2011



Item 1. Report to Stockholders:

The following is a copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940:



Putnam
Money Market
Fund

Annual report
9 | 30 | 11

Message from the Trustees  1 

About the fund  2 

Performance snapshot  4 

Interview with your fund’s portfolio managers  5 

Your fund’s performance  10 

Your fund’s expenses  11 

Terms and definitions  13 

Trustee approval of management contract  14 

Other information for shareholders  18 

Financial statements  19 

Federal tax information  41 

About the Trustees  42 

Officers  44 

 



Message from the Trustees

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

Markets have reflected a heightened state of investor anxiety in recent weeks and months. The deepening European sovereign debt crisis, the potential for an economic slowdown in the United States, and the deceleration of growth by economic powerhouse China have all diminished investors’ appetite for risk.

While volatility may linger for some time, it is important to note that Putnam’s active portfolio managers continue to pursue investment opportunities around the world. In fact, during times when emotion drives market movements, nimble investors have historically had the best opportunities to take advantage of market inefficiencies.

We believe that in volatile markets, it is important to consult your financial advisor to help determine whether your portfolio reflects an appropriate degree of diversification. We also note that Putnam continues to bolster its lineup of funds that seek to limit volatility or guard against downside risk.

We would like to thank John A. Hill, who has served as Chairman of the Trustees since 2000 and who continues on as a Trustee, for his service. We are pleased to announce that Jameson A. Baxter is the new Chair, having served as Vice Chair since 2005 and a Trustee since 1994. Ms. Baxter is President of Baxter Associates, Inc., a private investment firm, and Chair of the Mutual Fund Directors Forum. In addition, she serves as Chair Emeritus of the Board of Trustees of Mount Holyoke College, Director of the Adirondack Land Trust, and Trustee of the Nature Conservancy’s Adirondack Chapter.

Lastly, we would like to take this opportunity to welcome new shareholders to the fund and to thank all of our investors for your continued confidence in Putnam.




About the fund

Seeking to offer accessibility and current income with relatively low risk

For most people, keeping part of their savings in an easily accessible place is an essential part of an investment plan. Putnam Money Market Fund can play a valuable role in many investors’ portfolios because it seeks to provide stability of principal and liquidity to meet short-term needs. In addition, the fund aims to provide investors with current income at short-term rates.

Because it invests in high-quality short-term money market instruments, the fund’s risk of losing principal may be lower than that of other funds. It typically invests in securities that are rated in the highest or second-highest category of at least one nationally recognized rating service. The fund seeks as high a rate of current income as Putnam Management believes is consistent with preservation of capital and maintenance of liquidity. Money market fund yields typically rise and fall along with short-term interest rates. Money market funds may not track rates exactly, however, as securities in these funds mature and are replaced with newer instruments earning the most current interest rates.

Whether you want to earmark money for near-term expenses or future investment opportunities, or just stow away cash for an unforeseen “rainy day,” this fund can be an appropriate choice.

Consider these risks before investing: Money market funds are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other governmental agency. The effects of inflation may erode the value of your investment over time. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

Types of money market securities

Money market securities are issued by governments, government agencies, financial institutions, and established non-financial companies. Securities your fund invests in include:

Commercial paper Short-term unsecured loans issued by large corporations, typically for financing accounts receivable and inventories

Bank certificates of deposit Direct obligations of the issuing commercial bank or savings and loan association

Repurchase agreements (repos) Contracts in which one party sells a security to another party and agrees to buy it back later at a specified price; acts in economic terms as a secured loan

Government securities Direct short-term obligations of governments or government agencies; for example, U.S. Treasury bills

Variable-rate demand notes (VRDNs) Floating-rate securities with a long-term maturity, usually 20 or 30 years, that carry a coupon that resets every one or seven days, making them eligible for purchase by money market mutual funds.





Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. Share price, principal value, and return will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance of class A shares assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes. Yield reflects current performance more closely than total return. See pages 5 and 10–11 for additional performance information. For a portion of the periods, this fund had expense limitations, without which returns would have been lower. To obtain the most recent month-end performance, visit putnam.com.

4



Interview with your fund’s portfolio managers

Joanne M. Driscoll, CFA, and Jonathan M. Topper

How would you describe the investment environment during the 12 months ended September 30, 2011?

Joanne: With all the uncertainty and market volatility facing investors today, it’s easy to forget that the U.S. economy was beginning to turn a corner in the early months of the reporting period. Riskier assets like high-yield bonds and equities were rallying in response to a series of positive developments — most notably the encouraging financial results from corporate America. However, several developments pushed investors to reassess their expectations this past spring. Mixed economic indicators, Europe’s sovereign debt crisis, U.S. budget discussions, and inflationary pressures in China depressed investor sentiment and contributed to a more challenging atmosphere in the second half of the period.

Amid the increased uncertainty, we maintained Putnam Money Market Fund’s conservative, high-quality focus and avoided the distressed sectors of the money market. The fund performed in line with the current interest-rate environment, which has been defined, in large measure, by the Fed’s [Federal Reserve’s] decision to hold its benchmark federal funds rate steady in the 0%-to-0.25% range for 33 months since December 2008. While the Fed’s action was designed to promote liquidity in the financial system and to stimulate economic growth, it has resulted in returns and yields on money market securities that have hovered at historic lows.

The Fed has effectively cut interest rates to zero percent. What other steps has the central bank taken in recent months to foster stronger economic growth?

Jonathan: For some time, we have held the view that the Fed was unlikely to change its accommodative monetary policy until late 2012. However, given the increased risk of


This comparison shows your fund’s performance in the context of broad market indexes for the 12 months ended 9/30/11. See pages 4 and 10–11 for additional fund performance information. Index descriptions can be found on page 13.

5



an economic downturn in recent months, the Fed calmed the markets in August by announcing that its current accommodative stance would extend well into 2013. We now expect the Fed to maintain this posture at least until the middle of 2013.

With little wiggle room with regard to monetary policy, the Fed, in a widely expected stimulus move, announced “Operation Twist” in September. The program involves selling $400 billion in short-term Treasuries and then buying an equal amount of longer-term Treasuries, starting in October 2011 and ending in June 2012. This program is designed to push down yields on long-term bonds, while keeping short-term rates relatively unchanged. By helping to lower interest rates on mortgage and business loans, the Fed hopes that consumers and companies will have an incentive to borrow and spend money.

What are the implications of the European debt crisis for U.S. money market investors?

Joanne: The eurozone’s debt issues and the lack of a coordinated response weighed on investors’ minds throughout the period — contributing to weak confidence in the region. Many troubled European banks hold billions of euros in the sovereign debt of Greece, Spain, Italy, and other struggling European countries, with French banks appearing the most vulnerable. The worry is that the European crisis could potentially spread to the United States, as many U.S. money market funds hold short-term European bank debt.

Over the course of the period, U.S. money market fund managers have been reducing their exposure to European banks — as we at Putnam did — thereby attempting to limit the fallout in the event that the crisis deteriorates further.


Allocations are represented as a percentage of portfolio value. Summary information may differ from the portfolio schedule included in the financial statements due to the inclusion of derivative securities and the exclusion of as-of trades, if any, and the use of different classifications of securities for presentation purposes. Holdings and allocations may vary over time.

6




In August, ratings agency S&P [Standard & Poor’s] downgraded its credit rating for U.S. Treasuries. How significant was that move, and how did it affect money markets?

Jonathan: During the summer debt-ceiling debates, S&P was fairly clear that Washington’s inability to address such key issues as entitlement reform and tax reform — and thereby failing to reduce the federal deficit over the next decade — would result in a downgrade. Ultimately, Congress raised the debt ceiling to meet its short-term debt obligations and passed a plan to reduce the federal debt by at least $2.1 trillion over the next decade instead of the $4 trillion that the rating agency was recommending. Citing concern about the growing burden of long-term U.S. federal debt, S&P followed through and downgraded the U.S. sovereign debt by one ratings notch from AAA to AA+.

It is important to note that the other two agencies — Moody’s and Fitch — did not follow suit. To answer the question about how the S&P downgrade affected money market funds, the downgrade applies only to the U.S. government’s long-term debt. In light of SEC [Securities and Exchange Commission] limitations on money market funds investing in longer-term securities, a money market fund would be more directly affected by a short-term debt rating downgrade. And there has not been any public discussion by the major rating agencies of downgrading the short-term credit rating for U.S. debt.

We continually monitor the amount of liquidity the fund maintains and adjust it where necessary to meet the needs of our shareholders. SEC Rule 2a-7, which governs the operations of registered money market funds and requires them to invest only in short-term, highly liquid securities that represent minimal credit risk, specifically mandates that taxable money market funds maintain 10% daily investments and 30% weekly investments as minimum liquidity requirements.

Where did you find your best investment opportunities in this complex market environment?

Joanne: Over the past year, we have remained diligent in our credit research process to avoid exposure to securities that might pose risks to the funds. As a result, we have maintained significant allocations to high-quality money market securities, such as repurchase agreements that are collateralized by government securities. We also selectively added to the fund’s credit exposure outside of Europe, most notably in Canada, and the Australian and Nordic regions. In addition, we added exposure to municipal securities through commercial paper and VRDNs [variable-rate demand notes]. We believe tax-exempt rates have become attractive due to the low-rate environment and provide additional diversification with solid credit profiles. On September 30, 2011, the 7-day yield [with the fund’s expense limitation] was 0.01%, and the portfolio’s WAM [weighted average maturity] was 28 days.

Which holdings exemplified your strategy?

Jonathan: During the period, the fund was exposed to large creditworthy banks, such as JPMorgan Chase, Royal Bank of Canada, and the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, with tight maturity limits. Looking at underlying bank fundamentals, we continue to see a relatively improving picture, however. Asset-quality measures are showing improving trends. Profits are being retained and are helping to build capital. These positive developments are somewhat offset by the banks’ underlying revenue weakness with soft loan demand, pressured interest margins,

7



lower capital markets volume, and ongoing regulatory pressure on fee business. The European sovereign debt stress remains an influence on our overall bank positioning, and we have limited these exposures.

What is your outlook for the economy and money markets over the next several months?

Joanne: Revised GDP data show that the U.S. recession was deeper than we originally thought, suggesting that the recovery will likely be slower. U.S. growth in the first half of 2011 was especially weak, held back by higher oil prices, fiscal tightening, especially at the state and local levels, and the disruptive consequences of the Japanese disasters. With some of these factors reversing, we expected to see stronger performance in the second half of 2011. But we believe that the weakness in the financial markets during the third quarter and the mounting stresses in Europe represent major headwinds for the economy. Furthermore, sharp declines have occurred in consumer confidence and in key business indicators, notably, the Philadelphia Fed Index, and, in our view, the risk of a “double-dip” recession is now uncomfortably high.

When economic conditions begin to solidly improve, we believe interest-rate normalization in the United States is likely to occur. Until that time, with money market yields indicating that short-term rates could hold at their current and very low levels well into 2012 and beyond, we will continue to focus on safety and liquidity, while looking for competitive yields further out on the money market maturity spectrum when investment opportunities arise.

Thank you, Joanne and Jonathan, for bringing us up to date.

The views expressed in this report are exclusively those of Putnam Management and are subject to change. They are not meant as investment advice.


This chart shows how the fund’s top weightings have changed over the past six months. Weightings are shown as a percentage of portfolio value. Summary information may differ from the portfolio schedule included in the financial statements due to the inclusion of derivative securities and the exclusion of as-of trades, if any, and the use of different classifications of securities for presentation purposes. Holdings will vary over time.

8



Please note that the holdings discussed in this report may not have been held by the fund for the entire period. Portfolio composition is subject to review in accordance with the fund’s investment strategy and may vary in the future. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.


Portfolio Manager Joanne M. Driscoll has an M.B.A. from the Northeastern College of Business Administration and a B.S. from Westfield State College. A CFA charterholder, Joanne joined Putnam in 1995 and has been in the investment industry since 1992.


Portfolio Manager Jonathan M. Topper is a Portfolio Analyst at Putnam. He has a B.A. from Northeastern University. Jonathan has been in the investment industry since he joined Putnam in 1990.

IN THE NEWS

U.S. corporations are holding more cash on their books than at any time in nearly 50 years. At the end of June, non-financial companies held more than $2 trillion in cash and other liquid assets, according to the Federal Reserve (the Fed). This marks an increase of more than $88 billion since the end of March. Cash accounted for 7.1% of all company assets, according to the Fed, the highest level since 1963. The Fed’s analysis does not include the substantial amount of cash that U.S. companies hold overseas. While critics are putting pressure on companies to use the cash to invest or create more jobs, others say the sizeable cash holdings could provide an important buffer for U.S. companies if European bank woes should spark a global financial crisis.

9



Your fund’s performance

This section shows your fund’s performance, price, and distribution information for periods ended September 30, 2011, the end of its most recent fiscal year. In accordance with regulatory requirements for mutual funds, we also include expense information taken from the fund’s current prospectus. Performance should always be considered in light of a fund’s investment strategy. Data represent past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. More recent returns may be less or more than those shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance information does not reflect any deduction for taxes a shareholder may owe on fund distributions or on the redemption of fund shares. For the most recent month-end performance, please visit the Individual Investors section at putnam.com or call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581. Class R shares are not available to all investors. See the Terms and Definitions section in this report for definitions of the share classes offered by your fund.

Fund performance Total return for periods ended 9/30/11

  Class A  Class B  Class C  Class M  Class R  Class T 
(inception dates)  (10/1/76)  (4/27/92)  (2/1/99)  (12/8/94)  (1/21/03)  (12/31/01) 

  Net          Net  Net  Net 
  asset  Before  After  Before  After  asset  asset  asset 
  value  CDSC  CDSC  CDSC  CDSC  value  value  value 

Annual average                 
(life of fund)  5.61%  5.13%  5.13%  5.13%  5.13%  5.47%  5.12%  5.37% 

10 years  20.69  16.18  16.18  16.19  16.19  19.30  16.44  18.42 
Annual average  1.90  1.51  1.51  1.51  1.51  1.78  1.53  1.71 

5 years  9.53  8.09  6.09  8.09  8.09  9.07  8.09  8.77 
Annual average  1.84  1.57  1.19  1.57  1.57  1.75  1.57  1.70 

3 years  0.92  0.60  –2.40  0.60  0.60  0.81  0.60  0.74 
Annual average  0.31  0.20  –0.81  0.20  0.20  0.27  0.20  0.25 

1 year  0.01  0.01  –4.99  0.01  –0.99  0.01  0.01  0.01 

  Net          Net  Net  Net 
Current yield  asset  Before  After  Before  After  asset  asset  asset 
(end of period)*  value  CDSC  CDSC  CDSC  CDSC  value  value  value 

Current 7-day yield                 
(with expense limitation)  0.01%  0.01%    0.01%    0.01%  0.01%  0.01% 

Current 7-day yield                 
(without expense limitation)  –0.32  –0.82    –0.81    –0.47  –0.82  –0.57 

 

Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. None of the share classes carry an initial sales charge. Class B share returns reflect the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC), which is 5% in the first year, declining over time to 1% in the sixth year, and is eliminated thereafter. Class C share returns reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year that is eliminated thereafter. Class A, M, R, and T shares generally have no CDSC. Performance for class B, C, M, R, and T shares before their inception is derived from the historical performance of class A shares, adjusted for the applicable sales charge (or CDSC) and the higher operating expenses for such shares.

* The 7-day yield is the most common gauge for measuring money market mutual fund performance. Yield reflects current performance more closely than total return.

For a portion of the periods, the fund had expense limitations, without which returns would have been lower.

Class B share performance does not reflect conversion to class A shares.

10



Comparative Lipper returns For periods ended 9/30/11

  Lipper Money Market Funds category average* 

Annual average (life of fund)  5.73% 

10 years  17.24 
Annual average  1.60 

5 years  8.20 
Annual average  1.59 

3 years  0.58 
Annual average  0.19 

1 year  0.02 

 

Lipper results should be compared to fund performance at net asset value.

* Over the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and life-of-fund periods ended 9/30/11, there were 274, 252, 234, 194, and 15 funds, respectively, in this Lipper category.

Fund distribution information For the 12-month period ended 9/30/11

Distributions  Class A  Class B  Class C  Class M  Class R  Class T 

Number  12  12  12  12  12  12 

Income  $0.000136  $0.000136  $0.000136  $0.000136  $0.000136  $0.000136 

Capital gains             

Total  $0.000136  $0.000136  $0.000136  $0.000136  $0.000136  $0.000136 

 

The classification of distributions, if any, is an estimate. Final distribution information will appear on your year-end tax forms.

Your fund’s expenses

As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees, distribution fees (12b-1 fees), and other expenses. In the most recent six-month period, your fund’s expenses were limited; had expenses not been limited, they would have been higher. Using the following information, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds. You may also pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial representative.

Expense ratios

  Class A  Class B  Class C  Class M  Class R  Class T 

Total annual operating expenses for the fiscal year             
ended 9/30/10*  0.50%  1.00%  1.00%  0.65%  1.00%  0.75% 

Annualized expense ratio for the six-month period             
ended 9/30/11†‡  0.18%  0.18%  0.18%  0.18%  0.18%  0.18% 

 

Fiscal-year expense information in this table is taken from the most recent prospectus, is subject to change, and may differ from that shown for the annualized expense ratio and in the financial highlights of this report. Expenses are shown as a percentage of average net assets.

* Restated to reflect projected expenses under a management contract effective 1/1/10.

† For the fund’s most recent fiscal half year; may differ from expense ratios based on one-year data in the financial highlights.

‡ Reflects a voluntary waiver of certain fund expenses.

11



Expenses per $1,000

The following table shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in the fund from April 1, 2011, to September 30, 2011. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.

  Class A  Class B  Class C  Class M  Class R  Class T 

Expenses paid per $1,000*†  $0.90  $0.90  $0.90  $0.90  $0.90  $0.90 

Ending value (after expenses)  $1,000.10  $1,000.10  $1,000.10  $1,000.10  $1,000.10  $1,000.10 

 

* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 9/30/11. The expense ratio may differ for each share class.

† Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.

Estimate the expenses you paid

To estimate the ongoing expenses you paid for the six months ended September 30, 2011, use the following calculation method. To find the value of your investment on April 1, 2011, call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581.


Compare expenses using the SEC’s method

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the following table shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total costs) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.

  Class A  Class B  Class C  Class M  Class R  Class T 

Expenses paid per $1,000*†  $0.91  $0.91  $0.91  $0.91  $0.91  $0.91 

Ending value (after expenses)  $1,024.17  $1,024.17  $1,024.17  $1,024.17  $1,024.17  $1,024.17 

 

* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 9/30/11. The expense ratio may differ for each share class.

† Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.

12



Terms and definitions

Important terms

Total return shows how the value of the fund’s shares changed over time, assuming you held the shares through the entire period and reinvested all distributions in the fund.

Net asset value (NAV) is the price, or value, of one share of a mutual fund, without a sales charge. Net asset values fluctuate with market conditions, and are calculated by dividing the net assets of each class of shares by the number of outstanding shares in the class.

Contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) is generally a charge applied at the time of the redemption of class B or C shares and assumes redemption at the end of the period. Your fund’s class B CDSC declines over time from a 5% maximum during the first year to 1% during the sixth year. After the sixth year, the CDSC no longer applies. The CDSC for class C shares is 1% for one year after purchase.

Current yield is the annual rate of return earned from dividends or interest of an investment. Current yield is expressed as a percentage of the price of a security, fund share, or principal investment.

Share classes

Class A shares generally are fund shares purchased with an initial sales charge. In the case of your fund, which has no sales charge, the reference is to shares purchased or acquired through the exchange of class A shares from another Putnam fund. Exchange of your fund’s class A shares into another fund may involve a sales charge, however.

Class B shares are not subject to an initial sales charge. They may be subject to a CDSC.

Class C shares are not subject to an initial sales charge and are subject to a CDSC only if the shares are redeemed during the first year.

Class M shares generally are fund shares that have a lower initial sales charge and a higher 12b-1 fee than class A shares and no CDSC. In the case of your fund, which has no sales charge, the reference is to shares purchased or acquired through the exchange of class M shares from another Putnam fund. Exchange of your fund’s class M shares into another fund may involve a sales charge, however.

Class R shares are not subject to an initial sales charge or CDSC and are available only to certain defined contribution plans.

Class T shares are not subject to an initial sales charge or CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares acquired by exchange of shares of another Putnam fund bought without an initial sales charge); however, they are subject to a 12b-1 fee.

Comparative indexes

Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S. investment-grade fixed-income securities.

BofA (Bank of America) Merrill Lynch U.S. 3-Month Treasury Bill Index is an unmanaged index that seeks to measure the performance of U.S. Treasury bills available in the marketplace.

Lipper Money Market Funds category average is an arithmetic average of the total return of all money market mutual funds tracked by Lipper.

S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stock performance.

Indexes assume reinvestment of all distributions and do not account for fees. Securities and performance of a fund and an index will differ. You cannot invest directly in an index.

Lipper is a third-party industry-ranking entity that ranks mutual funds. Its rankings do not reflect sales charges. Lipper rankings are based on total return at net asset value relative to other funds that have similar current investment styles or objectives as determined by Lipper. Lipper may change a fund’s category assignment at its discretion. Lipper category averages reflect performance trends for funds within a category.

13



Trustee approval of management contract

General conclusions

The Board of Trustees of the Putnam funds oversees the management of each fund and, as required by law, determines annually whether to approve the continuance of your fund’s management contract with Putnam Investment Management (“Putnam Management”) and the sub-management contract with respect to your fund between Putnam Management and its affiliate, Putnam Investments Limited (“PIL”).

The Board of Trustees, with the assistance of its Contract Committee, which consists solely of Trustees who are not “interested persons” (as this term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the Putnam funds (“Independent Trustees”), requests and evaluates all information it deems reasonably necessary under the circumstances in connection with its annual contract review. Over the course of several months ending in June 2011, the Contract Committee met on a number of occasions with representatives of Putnam Management, and separately in executive session, to consider the information that Putnam Management provided and other information developed with the assistance of the Board’s independent counsel and independent staff. The Contract Committee reviewed and discussed key aspects of this information with all of the Independent Trustees on a number of occasions. At the Trustees’ June 17, 2011 meeting, the Contract Committee recommended, and the Independent Trustees approved, the continuance of your fund’s management and sub-management contracts, effective July 1, 2011. (Because PIL is an affiliate of Putnam Management and Putnam Management remains fully responsible for all services provided by PIL, the Trustees have not evaluated PIL as a separate entity, and all subsequent references to Putnam Management below should be deemed to include reference to PIL as necessary or appropriate in the context.)

The Independent Trustees’ approval was based on the following conclusions:

That the fee schedule in effect for your fund represented reasonable compensation in light of the nature and quality of the services being provided to the fund, the fees paid by competitive funds, and the costs incurred by Putnam Management in providing services, and

That the fee schedule represented an appropriate sharing between fund shareholders and Putnam Management of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the fund at current asset levels.

These conclusions were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and were not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations and how the Trustees considered these factors are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the management arrangements for your fund and the other Putnam funds are the result of many years of review and discussion between the Independent Trustees and Putnam Management, that some aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of fee arrangements in previous years.

Management fee schedules and total expenses

The Trustees reviewed the management fee schedules in effect for all Putnam funds, including fee levels and breakpoints. In reviewing management fees, the Trustees generally focus their attention on material changes in circumstances — for example, changes in assets under management or investment style, changes in Putnam Management’s operating costs, or changes in competitive

14



practices in the mutual fund industry — that suggest that consideration of fee changes might be warranted. The Trustees concluded that the circumstances did not warrant changes to the management fee structure of your fund.

Most of the open-end Putnam funds have new management contracts, with new fee schedules reflecting the implementation of more competitive fee levels for many funds, complex-wide breakpoints for the open-end funds, and performance fees for some funds. These new management contracts have been in effect for a little over a year — since January or, for a few funds, February, 2010. The Trustees approved the new management contracts on July 10, 2009, and fund shareholders subsequently approved the contracts by overwhelming majorities of the shares voted.

Because these management contracts had been implemented only recently, the Contract Committee had limited practical experience with the operation of the new fee structures. Under its new management contract, your fund has the benefit of breakpoints in its management fee that provide shareholders with significant economies of scale in the form of reduced fee levels as assets under management in the Putnam family of funds increase. The Contract Committee observed that the complex-wide breakpoints of the open-end funds had only been in place for a short while, and the Trustees will examine the operation of this new breakpoint structure in future years in light of further experience.

As in the past, the Trustees also focused on the competitiveness of each fund’s total expense ratio. In order to ensure that expenses of the Putnam funds continue to meet evolving competitive standards, the Trustees and Putnam Management agreed in 2009 to implement certain expense limitations. These expense limitations serve in particular to maintain competitive expense levels for funds with large numbers of small shareholder accounts and funds with relatively small net assets. Most funds, including your fund, had sufficiently low expenses that these expense limitations did not apply. The expense limitations were: (i) a contractual expense limitation applicable to all retail open-end funds of 37.5 basis points on investor servicing fees and expenses and (ii) a contractual expense limitation applicable to all open-end funds of 20 basis points on so-called “other expenses” (i.e., all expenses exclusive of management fees, investor servicing fees, distribution fees, investment-related expenses, interest, taxes, brokerage commissions and extraordinary expenses). Putnam Management’s support for these expense limitations was an important factor in the Trustees’ decision to approve the continuance of your fund’s management and sub-management contracts. In addition, Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership (“PRM”) voluntarily waived certain fees in order to enhance your fund’s annualized net yield during its fiscal year ending in 2010. This fee waiver was voluntary and may be modified or discontinued at any time without notice.

The Trustees reviewed comparative fee and expense information for a custom group of competitive funds selected by Lipper Inc. This comparative information included your fund’s percentile ranking for effective management fees and total expenses (excluding any applicable 12b-1 fee), which provides a general indication of your fund’s relative standing. In the custom peer group, your fund ranked in the 2nd quintile in effective management fees (determined for your fund and the other funds in the custom peer group based on fund asset size and the applicable contractual management fee schedule) and in the 2nd quintile in total expenses (excluding any applicable 12b-1 fees) as of December 31, 2010 (the first quintile representing the least expensive funds and the fifth quintile the most expensive funds). The fee and expense data reported by Lipper as of December 31, 2010 reflected the most recent fiscal year-end data available in Lipper’s database at that time.

15



In connection with their review of the management fees and total expenses of the Putnam funds, the Trustees also reviewed the costs of the services provided and the profits realized by Putnam Management and its affiliates from their contractual relationships with the funds. This information included trends in revenues, expenses and profitability of Putnam Management and its affiliates relating to the investment management, investor servicing and distribution services provided to the funds. In this regard, the Trustees also reviewed an analysis of Putnam Management’s revenues, expenses and profitability, allocated on a fund-by-fund basis, with respect to the funds’ management, distribution, and investor servicing contracts. For each fund, the analysis presented information about revenues, expenses and profitability for each of the agreements separately and for the agreements taken together on a combined basis. The Trustees concluded that, at current asset levels, the fee schedules in place represented reasonable compensation for the services being provided and represented an appropriate sharing of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the funds at that time.

The information examined by the Trustees as part of their annual contract review for the Putnam funds has included for many years information regarding fees charged by Putnam Management and its affiliates to institutional clients such as defined benefit pension plans, college endowments, and the like. This information included comparisons of those fees with fees charged to the funds, as well as an assessment of the differences in the services provided to these different types of clients. The Trustees observed that the differences in fee rates between institutional clients and mutual funds are by no means uniform when examined by individual asset sectors, suggesting that differences in the pricing of investment management services to these types of clients may reflect historical competitive forces operating in separate markets. The Trustees considered the fact that in many cases fee rates across different asset classes are higher on average for mutual funds than for institutional clients, as well as the differences between the services that Putnam Management provides to the Putnam funds and those that it provides to its institutional clients. The Trustees did not rely on these comparisons to any significant extent in concluding that the management fees paid by your fund are reasonable.

Investment performance

The quality of the investment process provided by Putnam Management represented a major factor in the Trustees’ evaluation of the quality of services provided by Putnam Management under your fund’s management contract. The Trustees were assisted in their review of the Putnam funds’ investment process and performance by the work of several investment oversight committees of the Trustees, which met on a regular basis with the funds’ portfolio teams and with the Chief Investment Officer and other members of Putnam Management’s Investment Division throughout the year. The Trustees concluded that Putnam Management generally provides a high-quality investment process — based on the experience and skills of the individuals assigned to the management of fund portfolios, the resources made available to them, and in general Putnam Management’s ability to attract and retain high-quality personnel — but also recognized that this does not guarantee favorable investment results for every fund in every time period. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each fund over multiple time periods and considered information comparing each fund’s performance with various benchmarks and with the performance of competitive funds.

The Committee noted the substantial improvement in the performance of most Putnam funds during the 2009–2010 period and Putnam Management’s ongoing efforts to strengthen its investment personnel and processes. The Committee also noted the

16



disappointing investment performance of some funds for periods ended December 31, 2010 and considered information provided by Putnam Management regarding the factors contributing to the underperformance and actions being taken to improve the performance of these particular funds. The Trustees indicated their intention to continue to monitor performance trends to assess the effectiveness of these efforts and to evaluate whether additional actions to address areas of underperformance are warranted.

In the case of your fund, the Trustees considered that its class A share cumulative total return performance at net asset value was in the following quartiles of its Lipper Inc. peer group (Lipper Money Market Funds) for the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended December 31, 2010 (the first quartile representing the best-performing funds and the fourth quartile the worst-performing funds):

One-year period  1st 

Three-year period  1st 

Five-year period  1st 

 

Over the one-year, three-year and five-year periods ended December 31, 2010, there were 281, 266 and 247 funds, respectively, in your fund’s Lipper peer group. (When considering performance information, shareholders should be mindful that past performance is not a guarantee of future results.)

Brokerage and soft-dollar allocations; investor servicing

The Trustees considered various potential benefits that Putnam Management may receive in connection with the services it provides under the management contract with your fund. These include benefits related to brokerage allocation and the use of soft dollars, whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research services that are expected to be useful to Putnam Management in managing the assets of the fund and of other clients. Subject to policies established by the Trustees, soft-dollar credits acquired through these means are used primarily to supplement Putnam Management’s internal research efforts. However, the Trustees noted that a portion of available soft-dollar credits continues to be allocated to the payment of fund expenses. The Trustees indicated their continued intent to monitor regulatory developments in this area with the assistance of their Brokerage Committee and also indicated their continued intent to monitor the potential benefits associated with fund brokerage and soft-dollar allocations and trends in industry practices to ensure that the principle of seeking best price and execution remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.

Putnam Management may also receive benefits from payments that the funds make to Putnam Management’s affiliates for investor or distribution services. In conjunction with the annual review of your fund’s management contract, the Trustees reviewed your fund’s investor servicing agreement with Putnam Investor Services, Inc. (“PSERV”) and its distributor’s contracts and distribution plans with PRM, both of which are affiliates of Putnam Management. The Trustees concluded that the fees payable by the funds to PSERV and PRM, as applicable, for such services are reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of such services.

17



Other information for shareholders

Important notice regarding Putnam’s privacy policy

In order to conduct business with our shareholders, we must obtain certain personal information such as account holders’ names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and dates of birth. Using this information, we are able to maintain accurate records of accounts and transactions.

It is our policy to protect the confidentiality of our shareholder information, whether or not a shareholder currently owns shares of our funds. In particular, it is our policy not to sell information about you or your accounts to outside marketing firms. We have safeguards in place designed to prevent unauthorized access to our computer systems and procedures to protect personal information from unauthorized use.

Under certain circumstances, we must share account information with outside vendors who provide services to us, such as mailings and proxy solicitations. In these cases, the service providers enter into confidentiality agreements with us, and we provide only the information necessary to process transactions and perform other services related to your account. Finally, it is our policy to share account information with your financial representative, if you’ve listed one on your Putnam account.

Proxy voting

Putnam is committed to managing our mutual funds in the best interests of our shareholders. The Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures, as well as information regarding how your fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2011, are available in the Individual Investors section at putnam.com, and on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. If you have questions about finding forms on the SEC’s website, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain the Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures at no charge by calling Putnam’s Shareholder Services at 1-800-225-1581.

Fund portfolio holdings

The fund will file a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Shareholders may obtain the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information about the SEC’s website or the operation of the Public Reference Room.

Trustee and employee fund ownership

Putnam employees and members of the Board of Trustees place their faith, confidence, and, most importantly, investment dollars in Putnam mutual funds. As of September 30, 2011, Putnam employees had approximately $298,000,000 and the Trustees had approximately $65,000,000 invested in Putnam mutual funds. These amounts include investments by the Trustees’ and employees’ immediate family members as well as investments through retirement and deferred compensation plans.

18



Financial statements

These sections of the report, as well as the accompanying Notes, preceded by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, constitute the fund’s financial statements.

The fund’s portfolio lists all the fund’s investments and their values as of the last day of the reporting period. Holdings are organized by asset type and industry sector, country, or state to show areas of concentration and diversification.

Statement of assets and liabilities shows how the fund’s net assets and share price are determined. All investment and non-investment assets are added together. Any unpaid expenses and other liabilities are subtracted from this total. The result is divided by the number of shares to determine the net asset value per share, which is calculated separately for each class of shares. (For funds with preferred shares, the amount subtracted from total assets includes the liquidation preference of preferred shares.)

Statement of operations shows the fund’s net investment gain or loss. This is done by first adding up all the fund’s earnings — from dividends and interest income — and subtracting its operating expenses to determine net investment income (or loss). Then, any net gain or loss the fund realized on the sales of its holdings — as well as any unrealized gains or losses over the period — is added to or subtracted from the net investment result to determine the fund’s net gain or loss for the fiscal year.

Statement of changes in net assets shows how the fund’s net assets were affected by the fund’s net investment gain or loss, by distributions to shareholders, and by changes in the number of the fund’s shares. It lists distributions and their sources (net investment income or realized capital gains) over the current reporting period and the most recent fiscal year-end. The distributions listed here may not match the sources listed in the Statement of operations because the distributions are determined on a tax basis and may be paid in a different period from the one in which they were earned.

Financial highlights provide an overview of the fund’s investment results, per-share distributions, expense ratios, net investment income ratios, and portfolio turnover in one summary table, reflecting the five most recent reporting periods. In a semiannual report, the highlights table also includes the current reporting period.

19



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees and Shareholders of
Putnam Money Market Fund:

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Putnam Money Market Fund (the “fund”) at September 30, 2011, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of investments owned at September 30, 2011 by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and transfer agent provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 10, 2011

20



The fund’s portfolio 9/30/11

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS (34.3%)*  Principal amount  Value 

 
Interest in $295,000,000 joint tri-party repurchase agreement dated     
September 30, 2011 with Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. due October 3,     
2011 — maturity value of $90,000,750 for an effective yield of 0.10%     
(collateralized by various mortgage-backed securities with coupon rates     
ranging from 3.003% to 5.211% and due dates ranging from December 1,     
2020 to July 1, 2041, valued at $300,900,001)  $90,000,000  $90,000,000 

Interest in $93,409,000 joint tri-party repurchase agreement dated     
September 30, 2011 with Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. due October 3,     
2011 — maturity value of $72,704,424 for an effective yield of 0.07%     
(collateralized by United States Treasury notes with a coupon rate of 2.25%     
and a due date of July 31, 2018, valued at $95,277,239)  72,704,000  72,704,000 

Interest in $420,000,000 joint tri-party repurchase agreement dated     
September 30, 2011 with Goldman Sachs & Co. due October 3, 2011 —     
maturity value of $100,000,417 for an effective yield of 0.05% (collateralized     
by various mortgage-backed securities with coupon rates ranging from 2.458%     
to 6.00% and due dates ranging from April 1, 2026 to September 1, 2041,     
valued at $428,400,000)  100,000,000  100,000,000 

Interest in $56,000,000 joint tri-party repurchase agreement dated     
September 30, 2011 with JPMorgan Securities, Inc. due October 3, 2011 —     
maturity value of $37,000,555 for an effective yield of 0.18% (collateralized     
by various corporate bonds and notes with coupon rates ranging from 3.625%     
to 10.75% and due dates ranging from June 1, 2013 to October 1, 2040,     
valued at $58,802,622)  37,000,000  37,000,000 

Interest in $130,000,000 joint tri-party repurchase agreement dated     
September 30, 2011 with JPMorgan Securities, Inc. due October 3, 2011 —     
maturity value of $90,000,675 for an effective yield of 0.09% (collateralized     
by various Federal National Mortgage Association securities with coupon     
rates ranging from 3.50% to 7.00% and due dates ranging from April 1, 2012     
to October 1, 2041, valued at $132,600,769)  90,000,000  90,000,000 

Interest in $460,000,000 joint tri-party repurchase agreement dated     
September 30, 2011 with Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. due October 3, 2011 —     
maturity value of $87,000,580 for an effective yield of 0.08% (collateralized     
by Government National Mortgage Association securities with a coupon     
rate of 4.50% and a due date of May 20, 2041, valued at $469,200,001)  87,000,000  87,000,000 

Interest in $314,000,000 joint tri-party term repurchase agreement dated     
September 27, 2011 with Barclays Capital, Inc. due October 4, 2011, 0.07%     
(collateralized by various mortgage-backed securities with coupon rates     
ranging from 2.151% to 5.953% and due dates ranging from April 1, 2035     
to August 1, 2041, valued at $320,280,000) TR  19,000,000  19,000,000 

Interest in $286,500,000 joint tri-party term repurchase agreement dated     
September 27, 2011 with Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. due October 4, 2011,     
0.12% (collateralized by various mortgage-backed securities with coupon rates     
ranging from 3.495% to 6.039% and due dates ranging from October 1, 2020     
to September 20, 2041, valued at $292,447,981) TR  38,000,000  38,000,000 

Interest in $150,000,000 joint tri-party term repurchase agreement dated     
September 28, 2011 with Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. due October 5,     
2011, 0.09% (collateralized by various Federal Home Loan Mortgage     
Corporation securities with coupon rates ranging from 3.50% to 7.00% and     
due dates ranging from January 1, 2026 to March 1, 2040, valued     
at $153,000,000) TR  36,500,000  36,500,000 

 

21



REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS (34.3%)* cont.  Principal amount  Value 

 
Interest in $150,000,000 joint tri-party term repurchase agreement dated     
September 28, 2011 with Goldman Sachs & Co. due October 5, 2011, 0.10%     
(collateralized by various Government National Mortgage Association     
securities with coupon rates ranging from 4.00% to 5.50% and due dates     
ranging from July 15, 2026 to April 20, 2041, valued at $153,000,001) TR  $36,500,000  $36,500,000 

Interest in $39,000,000 tri-party term repurchase agreement dated     
September 1, 2011 with Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. due November 4, 2011,     
0.27% FRN (collateralized by various corporate bonds and notes with coupon     
rates ranging from 0.597% to 6.60% and due dates ranging from December 5,     
2012 to January 5, 2038, valued at $40,950,001) TR  39,000,000  39,000,000 

Total repurchase agreements (cost $645,704,000)    $645,704,000 

 

ASSET-BACKED COMMERCIAL PAPER (19.6%)*  Yield (%)  Maturity date  Principal amount  Value 

 
Alpine Securitization Corp. (Switzerland)  0.160  10/7/11  $9,400,000  $9,399,749 

Bryant Park Funding, LLC  0.170  10/25/11  9,372,000  9,370,938 

Bryant Park Funding, LLC  0.170  10/20/11  8,700,000  8,699,219 

CAFCO, LLC  0.150  10/11/11  9,500,000  9,499,604 

CHARTA, LLC  0.170  10/14/11  9,500,000  9,499,417 

CIESCO LP  0.180  10/21/11  2,000,000  1,999,800 

CIESCO LP  0.170  10/27/11  9,200,000  9,198,870 

CRC Funding, LLC  0.170  10/28/11  9,500,000  9,498,789 

Fairway Finance, LLC (Canada)  0.200  11/4/11  19,800,000  19,796,260 

Fairway Finance, LLC (Canada)  0.200  10/25/11  4,700,000  4,699,373 

Fairway Finance, LLC (Canada)  0.200  10/19/11  4,000,000  3,999,600 

Falcon Asset Securitization Co., LLC  0.190  10/25/11  7,000,000  6,999,113 

Falcon Asset Securitization Co., LLC  0.160  10/11/11  2,500,000  2,499,889 

Falcon Asset Securitization Co., LLC  0.130  10/5/11  9,500,000  9,499,863 

FCAR Owner Trust I  0.200  10/5/11  17,120,000  17,119,620 

Govco, LLC  0.170  10/20/11  4,150,000  4,149,628 

Govco, LLC  0.160  10/21/11  4,400,000  4,399,609 

Jupiter Securitization Co., LLC  0.140  10/28/11  19,000,000  18,998,005 

Liberty Street Funding, LLC (Canada)  0.260  11/21/11  8,800,000  8,796,759 

Liberty Street Funding, LLC (Canada)  0.250  11/14/11  9,000,000  8,997,250 

Liberty Street Funding, LLC (Canada)  0.190  10/12/11  10,900,000  10,899,367 

Manhattan Asset Funding Co., LLC (Japan)  0.280  10/26/11  8,000,000  7,998,444 

Manhattan Asset Funding Co., LLC (Japan)  0.260  10/11/11  7,800,000  7,799,437 

Manhattan Asset Funding Co., LLC (Japan)  0.250  10/17/11  3,300,000  3,299,633 

Old Line Funding, LLC  0.250  11/3/11  12,200,000  12,197,204 

Old Line Funding, LLC  0.170  10/28/11  3,000,000  2,999,618 

Old Line Funding, LLC  0.160  10/20/11  3,000,000  2,999,747 

Straight-A Funding, LLC  0.190  11/14/11  26,000,000  25,993,962 

Straight-A Funding, LLC  0.190  11/3/11  22,000,000  21,996,168 

Straight-A Funding, LLC  0.160  10/3/11  10,000,000  9,999,911 

Thunder Bay Funding, LLC  0.220  11/10/11  5,000,000  4,998,778 

Thunder Bay Funding, LLC  0.210  11/2/11  12,000,000  11,997,760 

Thunder Bay Funding, LLC  0.190  10/24/11  590,000  589,928 

 

22



ASSET-BACKED COMMERCIAL PAPER (19.6%)* cont.  Yield (%)  Maturity date  Principal amount  Value 

 
Thunder Bay Funding, LLC  0.180  10/11/11  $1,433,000  $1,432,928 

Variable Funding Capital Co., LLC  0.180  10/18/11  4,000,000  3,999,660 

Variable Funding Capital Co., LLC  0.170  10/28/11  16,700,000  16,697,871 

Victory Receivables Corp. (Japan)  0.310  12/20/11  4,100,000  4,097,176 

Victory Receivables Corp. (Japan)  0.310  12/13/11  12,900,000  12,891,891 

Victory Receivables Corp. (Japan)  0.240  10/21/11  11,390,000  11,388,481 

Working Capital Management Co. (Japan)  0.310  10/4/11  9,100,000  9,099,765 

Working Capital Management Co. (Japan)  0.240  10/3/11  9,100,000  9,099,879 

Total asset-backed commercial paper (cost $369,598,963)      $369,598,963 

 

COMMERCIAL PAPER (15.5%)*    Maturity  Principal   
  Yield (%)  date  amount  Value 

 
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group, Ltd.         
(Australia)  0.351  2/2/12  $21,500,000  $21,474,081 

Barclays Bank PLC/Cayman (Cayman Islands)  0.200  10/6/11  9,500,000  9,499,736 

Canadian Imperial Holdings, Inc.  0.160  11/7/11  9,260,000  9,258,477 

Canadian Imperial Holdings, Inc.  0.140  10/5/11  9,260,000  9,259,856 

Citigroup Funding, Inc.  0.250  10/12/11  9,200,000  9,199,297 

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (Australia)  0.481  3/19/12  4,000,000  3,990,933 

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (Australia)  0.366  12/8/11  14,000,000  14,000,000 

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (Australia)  0.205  10/4/11  11,400,000  11,399,805 

DnB NOR Bank ASA (Norway)  0.271  12/7/11  27,100,000  27,086,339 

DnB NOR Bank ASA (Norway)  0.210  10/20/11  1,400,000  1,399,845 

General Electric Capital Corp.  0.230  12/30/11  9,000,000  8,994,825 

General Electric Capital Services  0.230  1/19/12  9,900,000  9,893,043 

HSBC USA, Inc. (United Kingdom)  0.220  12/27/11  9,200,000  9,195,109 

HSBC USA, Inc. (United Kingdom)  0.200  12/12/11  8,000,000  7,996,800 

HSBC USA, Inc. (United Kingdom)  0.190  11/28/11  11,000,000  10,996,633 

Nordea North America, Inc. (Sweden)  0.270  11/3/11  1,600,000  1,599,604 

Nordea North America, Inc. (Sweden)  0.225  10/21/11  27,000,000  26,996,625 

Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC         
(United Kingdom)  0.170  10/3/11  9,500,000  9,499,910 

State Street Corp.  0.250  12/8/11  10,500,000  10,495,042 

State Street Corp.  0.200  12/7/11  8,400,000  8,396,873 

Texas Instruments, Inc.  0.150  11/8/11  9,400,000  9,398,512 

Toronto-Dominion Holdings USA, Inc.         
(Canada)  0.150  10/17/11  3,600,000  3,599,760 

Toyota Credit Canada, Inc. (Canada)  0.240  10/17/11  9,480,000  9,478,989 

Toyota Credit Canada, Inc. (Canada)  0.180  11/15/11  10,000,000  9,997,750 

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.  0.080  10/11/11  19,000,000  18,999,578 

Westpac Banking Corp./NY 144A (Australia)  0.300  1/11/12  19,000,000  18,983,850 

Total commercial paper (cost $291,091,272)        $291,091,272 

 

23



MUNICIPAL BONDS    Maturity    Principal   
AND NOTES (11.8%)*  Yield (%)  date  Rating**  amount  Value 

 
Connecticut (0.4%)           
Yale University Commercial Paper  0.190  1/18/12  P-1  $7,000,000  $6,995,382 

          6,995,382 
Indiana (2.4%)           
Indiana State Finance Authority VRDN,           
Ser. A M  0.130  2/1/35  VMIG1  9,000,000  9,000,471 

Indiana State Finance Authority VRDN,           
Ser. A-1 M  0.130  2/1/37  VMIG1  2,000,000  2,000,000 

Saint Joseph County Commercial Paper           
(University of Notre Dame)  0.240  12/1/11  P-1  6,264,000  6,260,200 

Saint Joseph County Commercial Paper           
(University of Notre Dame)  0.152  10/3/11  P-1  6,000,000  5,999,150 

Trinity Health Corporation           
Commercial Paper  0.200  10/31/11  P-1  9,000,000  8,997,300 

Trinity Health Corporation           
Commercial Paper  0.160  10/7/11  P-1  13,000,000  12,999,653 

          45,256,774 
Kentucky (0.6%)           
Kentucky Economic Development Finance           
Authority VRDN (Catholic Health           
Initiatives), Ser. C M  0.120  5/1/34  VMIG1  11,000,000  11,000,000 

          11,000,000 
Maryland (2.2%)           
Howard County Commercial Paper  0.150  10/31/11  P-1  16,000,000  16,000,000 

Howard County Commercial Paper  0.150  10/31/11  P-1  2,750,000  2,750,000 

Johns Hopkins University Commercial           
Paper, Ser. A  0.140  11/15/11  P-1  5,000,000  5,000,000 

Johns Hopkins University Commercial           
Paper, Ser. A  0.130  11/1/11  P-1  6,000,000  6,000,000 

Johns Hopkins University Commercial           
Paper, Ser. B  0.130  10/4/11  P-1  13,400,000  13,400,000 

          43,150,000 
Massachusetts (0.6%)           
Harvard University Commercial Paper  0.140  11/15/11  P-1  8,000,000  7,998,600 

Harvard University Commercial Paper  0.180  10/3/11  P-1  4,200,000  4,199,958 

          12,198,558 
Michigan (0.3%)           
University of Michigan VRDN (Hospital),           
Ser. B M  0.100  12/1/37  VMIG1  5,000,000  5,000,000 

          5,000,000 
Montana (0.2%)           
Montana Facilities Finance Authority           
VRDN (Sisters of Charity), Ser. A M  0.140  12/1/25  VMIG1  2,825,000  2,825,000 

          2,825,000 
Nevada (0.5%)           
Truckee Meadows Water Authority           
Commercial Paper, Ser. 06-B (Lloyds           
TSB Bank PLC/New York (LOC))  0.150  10/6/11  P-1  9,600,000  9,600,000 

          9,600,000 

 

24



MUNICIPAL BONDS    Maturity    Principal   
AND NOTES (11.8%)* cont.  Yield (%)  date  Rating**  amount  Value 

 
New Hampshire (0.2%)           
New Hampshire Health & Education           
Facilities Authority VRDN (University           
of New Hampshire), Ser. B-2 M  0.140  7/1/33  VMIG1  $2,975,000  $2,975,000 

          2,975,000 
New York (0.7%)           
Trustees of Columbia University (The)           
Commercial Paper  0.150  10/13/11  P-1  13,000,000  12,999,350 

          12,999,350 
North Carolina (0.1%)           
Wake County VRDN, Ser. B M  0.120  3/1/24  VMIG1  1,500,000  1,500,000 

          1,500,000 
Ohio (0.2%)           
Columbus, Sewer VRDN, Ser. B M  0.100  6/1/32  VMIG1  3,530,000  3,530,000 

          3,530,000 
Oklahoma (0.1%)           
Oklahoma State Capitol Improvement           
Authority State Facilities VRDN (Higher           
Education), Ser. D2 M  0.320  7/1/32  VMIG1  2,800,000  2,800,000 

          2,800,000 
Tennessee (0.6%)           
Metropolitan Government Nashville &           
Davidson County, Health & Educational           
Facilities Board VRDN (Vanderbilt           
University), Ser. A-1 M  0.080  10/1/44  VMIG1  11,500,000  11,500,000 

          11,500,000 
Texas (1.5%)           
Board of Regents of Texas Tech           
University Revenue Financing System           
Commercial Paper, Ser. A  0.140  12/7/11  P-1  10,923,000  10,923,000 

Board of Regents of Texas Tech           
University Revenue Financing System           
Commercial Paper, Ser. A  0.140  11/1/11  P-1  8,500,000  8,500,000 

Harris County, Health Facilities           
Development Authority VRDN (Texas           
Childrens Hospital), Ser. B-1 M  0.150  10/1/29  VMIG1  3,795,000  3,795,000 

University of Texas System Board of           
Regents Revenue Financing System           
Commercial Paper, Ser. A  0.140  12/7/11  P-1  5,476,000  5,476,000 

          28,694,000 
Virginia (1.2%)           
Regents of University of Virginia           
Commercial Paper, Ser. 03-A  0.150  11/2/11  P-1  22,750,000  22,750,000 

          22,750,000 
 
Total municipal bonds and notes (cost $222,774,064)      $222,774,064 

 

25



U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY    Maturity  Principal   
OBLIGATIONS (5.2%)*  Yield (%)  date  amount  Value 

 
Bank of America Corp. FDIC guaranteed         
notes, MTN, Ser. L k  2.100  4/30/12  $39,000,000  $39,430,069 

Citigroup, Inc. FDIC guaranteed notes k  2.875  12/9/11  3,100,000  3,114,979 

Federal Home Loan Bank discount notes  0.100  11/8/11  3,900,000  3,899,588 

Federal Home Loan Bank discount notes  0.075  12/19/11  5,400,000  5,399,111 

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.         
discount notes  0.100  2/10/12  5,000,000  4,998,167 

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.         
discount notes  0.090  12/7/11  3,000,000  2,999,498 

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.         
discount notes  0.070  10/3/11  2,200,000  2,199,991 

Federal National Mortgage Association         
discount notes  0.080  12/30/11  1,570,000  1,569,686 

General Electric Capital Corp. FDIC         
guaranteed notes, FRN, MTN, Ser. G  1.267  12/9/11  7,000,000  7,013,255 

General Electric Capital Corp. FDIC         
guaranteed notes, MTN Ser. G k  3.000  12/9/11  22,453,000  22,567,123 

Wells Fargo & Co. FDIC guaranteed notes k  3.000  12/9/11  4,786,000  4,810,261 

Total U.S. government agency obligations (cost $98,001,728)      $98,001,728 
 
 
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENT FUND (5.2%)*      Shares  Value 

 
Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund 0.10% e      97,046,017  $97,046,017 

Total short-term investment fund (cost $97,046,017)      $97,046,017 
 
 
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (3.9%)*  Interest  Maturity  Principal   
  rate (%)  date  amount  Value 

 
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group, Ltd.         
(Australia)  0.250  11/16/11  $7,500,000  $7,500,000 

National Australia Bank/New York FRN         
(Australia)  0.235  10/6/11  28,000,000  28,000,000 

Svenska Handelsbanken/New York, NY         
(Sweden)  0.200  10/6/11  4,540,000  4,539,596 

Toronto-Dominion Bank/NY (Canada)  0.235  11/10/11  25,000,000  25,000,000 

Westpac Banking Corp./NY (Australia)  0.230  12/9/11  9,250,000  9,249,096 

Total certificates of deposit (cost $74,288,692)        $74,288,692 
 
 
CORPORATE BONDS AND NOTES (3.5%)*  Interest  Maturity  Principal   
  rate (%)  date  amount  Value 

 
Kommunalbanken AS sr. unsec. unsub. notes,         
EMTN, Ser. 1905 (Norway)  5.125  10/14/11  $13,000,000  $13,022,533 

Royal Bank of Canada 144A sr. unsec. notes         
FRN (Canada) M  0.689  5/15/14  29,425,000  29,427,621 

Svenska Handelsbanken/New York, NY 144A         
FRN (Sweden) M  0.376  6/8/17  23,500,000  23,500,000 

Total corporate bonds and notes (cost $65,950,154)      $65,950,154 

 

26



TIME DEPOSITS (1.5%)*  Interest  Maturity  Principal   
  rate (%)  date  amount  Value 

 
US Bank, NA/Cayman Islands  0.080  10/3/11  $28,500,000  $28,500,000 

Total time deposits (cost $28,500,000)        $28,500,000 
 
 
TOTAL INVESTMENTS         

Total investments (cost $1,892,954,890)        $1,892,954,890 

 

Key to holding’s abbreviations 
EMTN  Euro Medium Term Notes 
FDIC Guaranteed  Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Guaranteed 
FRN  Floating Rate Notes 
LOC  Letter of credit 
MTN  Medium Term Notes 
VRDN  Variable Rate Demand Notes 

 

Notes to the fund’s portfolio

Unless noted otherwise, the notes to the fund’s portfolio are for the close of the fund’s reporting period, which ran from October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 (the reporting period).

* Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $1,881,945,175.

** The Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch ratings indicated are believed to be the most recent ratings available at the close of the reporting period for the securities listed. Ratings are generally ascribed to securities at the time of issuance. While the agencies may from time to time revise such ratings, they undertake no obligation to do so, and the ratings do not necessarily represent what the agencies would ascribe to these securities at the close of the reporting period. The rating of an insured security represents what is believed to be the most recent rating of the insurer’s claims-paying ability available at the close of the reporting period and does not reflect any subsequent changes. Ratings are not covered by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Security ratings are defined in the Statement of Additional Information.

e See Note 5 to the financial statements regarding investments in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund. The rate quoted in the security description is the annualized 7-day yield of the fund at the close of the reporting period.

k The rates shown are the current interest rates at the close of the reporting period.

M The security’s effective maturity date is less than one year.

TR Maturity value of a term repurchase agreement will equal the principal amount of the repurchase agreement plus interest.

Debt obligations are considered secured unless otherwise indicated.

144A after the name of an issuer represents securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.

VRDN are floating-rate securities with a long-term maturity, that carry a coupon that resets every one or seven days. The rates shown are the current interest rates at the close of the reporting period.

The rates shown on FRN are the current interest rates at the close of the reporting period.

The dates shown on debt obligations are the original maturity dates.

DIVERSIFICATION BY COUNTRY       

 
Distribution of investments by country of risk at the close of the reporting period, excluding collateral received, if any (as a percentage of Portfolio Value): 
       
United States  75.1%  Norway  2.2% 

 
Canada  7.1  United Kingdom  2.0 

 
Australia  6.1  Cayman Islands  0.5 

 
Japan  3.5  Switzerland  0.5 

 
Sweden  3.0  Total  100.0% 

 

 

27



Accounting Standards Codification ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820) establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of the fund’s investments. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices for identical securities in active markets.

Level 2 — Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the fund’s net assets as of the close of the reporting period:

    Valuation inputs   

Investments in securities:  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 

Asset-backed commercial paper  $—  $369,598,963  $— 

Certificates of deposit    74,288,692   

Commercial paper    291,091,272   

Corporate bonds and notes    65,950,154   

Municipal bonds and notes    222,774,064   

Repurchase agreements    645,704,000   

Short-term investment fund  97,046,017     

Time deposits    28,500,000   

U.S. government agency obligations    98,001,728   

Totals by level  $97,046,017  $1,795,908,873  $— 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

28



Statement of assets and liabilities 9/30/11

ASSETS   

Investment in securities, at value (Note 1):   
Unaffiliated issuers (at amortized cost)  $1,150,204,873 
Affiliated issuers (identified cost $97,046,017) (Note 5)  97,046,017 
Repurchase agreements (identified cost $645,704,000)  645,704,000 

Cash  800 

Interest and other receivables  1,513,062 

Receivable for shares of the fund sold  3,717,098 

Receivable for investments sold  125,000 

Receivable from Manager (Note 2)  72,102 

Total assets  1,898,382,952 
 
LIABILITIES   

Distributions payable to shareholders  10,800 

Payable for shares of the fund repurchased  15,528,073 

Payable for investor servicing fees (Note 2)  264,624 

Payable for custodian fees (Note 2)  14,109 

Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2)  376,316 

Payable for administrative services (Note 2)  8,405 

Other accrued expenses  235,450 

Total liabilities  16,437,777 
 
Net assets  $1,881,945,175 

 
REPRESENTED BY   

Paid-in capital (Unlimited shares authorized) (Notes 1 and 4)  $1,883,328,413 

Distributions in excess of net investment income (Note 1)  (1,609) 

Accumulated net realized loss on investments (Note 1)  (1,381,629) 

Total — Representing net assets applicable to capital shares outstanding  $1,881,945,175 
 
COMPUTATION OF NET ASSET VALUE AND OFFERING PRICE   

Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per class A share   
($1,739,458,117 divided by 1,742,398,397 shares)  $1.00 

Net asset value and offering price per class B share ($27,668,288 divided by 27,715,063 shares)*  $1.00 

Net asset value and offering price per class C share ($31,073,360 divided by 31,114,742 shares)*  $1.00 

Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per class M share   
($31,296,274 divided by 31,343,492 shares)  $1.00 

Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per class R share   
($18,508,316 divided by 18,537,229 shares)  $1.00 

Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per class T share   
($33,940,820 divided by 33,998,820 shares)  $1.00 

 

* Redemption price per share is equal to net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

29



Statement of operations Year ended 9/30/11

INVESTMENT INCOME   

Interest (including interest income of $53,806 from investments in affiliated issuers) (Note 5)  $4,409,118 
 
EXPENSES   

Compensation of Manager (Note 2)  5,582,642 

Investor servicing fees (Note 2)  3,101,317 

Custodian fees (Note 2)  35,390 

Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2)  170,497 

Administrative services (Note 2)  54,152 

Distribution fees — Class B (Note 2)  148,772 

Distribution fees — Class C (Note 2)  123,177 

Distribution fees — Class M (Note 2)  47,944 

Distribution fees — Class R (Note 2)  86,057 

Distribution fees — Class T (Note 2)  85,026 

Other  673,813 

Fees waived and reimbursed by Manager (Note 2)  (5,924,605) 

Total expenses  4,184,182 
 
Expense reduction (Note 2)  (20,026) 

Net expenses  4,164,156 
 
Net investment income  244,962 

 
Net realized gain on investments (Notes 1 and 3)  224,432 

Net gain on investments  224,432 
 
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations  $469,394 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

30



Statement of changes in net assets

DECREASE IN NET ASSETS  Year ended 9/30/11  Year ended 9/30/10 

Operations:     
Net investment income  $244,962  $21,149 

Net realized gain (loss) on investments  224,432  (745,853) 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations  469,394  (724,704) 

Distributions to shareholders (Note 1):     
From ordinary income     
Net investment income     

Class A  (246,692)  (1,261,261) 

Class B  (4,169)  (26,733) 

Class C  (3,340)  (13,426) 

Class M  (4,478)  (24,426) 

Class R  (2,342)  (7,889) 

Class T  (4,633)  (18,187) 

Decrease from capital share transactions (Note 4)  (392,018,220)  (398,180,913) 

Total decrease in net assets  (391,814,480)  (400,257,539) 
 
NET ASSETS     

Beginning of year  2,273,759,655  2,674,017,194 

End of year (including distributions in excess of net investment     
income of $1,609 and undistributed net investment income     
of $19,083, respectively)  $1,881,945,175  $2,273,759,655 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

31



Financial highlights (For a common share outstanding throughout the period)

INVESTMENT OPERATIONS:      LESS DISTRIBUTIONS:      RATIOS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: 

                        Ratio of net 
                        investment 
                        income 
  Net asset                    Ratio  (loss) 
  value,    Net realized  Total from  From        Total return  Net assets,  of expenses  to average 
  beginning  Net investment  gain (loss)  investment  net investment  From  Total  Net asset value,  at net asset  end of period  to average  net assets 
Period ended  of period  income (loss)  on investments  operations  income  return of capital  distributions  end of period  value (%) a  (in thousands)  net assets (%) b  (%) 

Class A                         
September 30, 2011  $1.00  .0001  .0001  .0002  (.0001)    (.0001)  $1.00  .01  $1,739,458  .22 c  .01 c 
September 30, 2010  1.00  .0001  (.0003)  (.0002)  (.0005)    (.0005)  1.00  .06  2,131,331  .32 c  c,d 
September 30, 2009  1.00  .0091  (.0001)  .0090  (.0086)    (.0086)  1.00  .86  2,482,270  .56 c,e  .98 c,e 
September 30, 2008  1.00  .0327  (.0002)  .0325  (.0325)  (.0004)  (.0329)  1.00  3.35  3,212,674  .56 e  3.28 e 
September 30, 2007  1.00  .0486 f  g  .0486  (.0489)    (.0489)  1.00  5.01  3,394,996  .54 e  4.84 e,f 

Class B                         
September 30, 2011  $1.00  .0001  .0001  .0002  (.0001)    (.0001)  $1.00  .01  $27,668  .22 c  .01 c 
September 30, 2010  1.00  .0001  (.0003)  (.0002)  (.0005)    (.0005)  1.00  .06  37,121  .32 c  .01 c 
September 30, 2009  1.00  .0060  (.0001)  .0059  (.0054)    (.0054)  1.00  .54  66,020  .91 c,e  .68 c,e 
September 30, 2008  1.00  .0277  (.0002)  .0275  (.0276)  (.0003)  (.0279)  1.00  2.83  99,244  1.06 e  2.83 e 
September 30, 2007  1.00  .0436 f  g  .0436  (.0439)    (.0439)  1.00  4.49  117,474  1.04 e  4.34 e,f 

Class C                         
September 30, 2011  $1.00  .0001  .0001  .0002  (.0001)    (.0001)  $1.00  .01  $31,073  .22 c  .01 c 
September 30, 2010  1.00  .0001  (.0003)  (.0002)  (.0005)    (.0005)  1.00  .06  21,991  .32 c  c,d 
September 30, 2009  1.00  .0060  (.0001)  .0059  (.0054)    (.0054)  1.00  .54  27,757  .89 c,e  .62 c,e 
September 30, 2008  1.00  .0277  (.0002)  .0275  (.0276)  (.0003)  (.0279)  1.00  2.83  30,609  1.06 e  2.66 e 
September 30, 2007  1.00  .0436 f  g  .0436  (.0439)    (.0439)  1.00  4.49  19,456  1.04 e  4.34 e,f 

Class M                         
September 30, 2011  $1.00  .0001  .0001  .0002  (.0001)    (.0001)  $1.00  .01  $31,296  .22 c  .01 c 
September 30, 2010  1.00  .0001  (.0003)  (.0002)  (.0005)    (.0005)  1.00  .06  35,999  .32 c  c,d 
September 30, 2009  1.00  .0080  (.0001)  .0079  (.0074)    (.0074)  1.00  .74  46,293  .68 c,e  .83 c,e 
September 30, 2008  1.00  .0312  (.0002)  .0310  (.0310)  (.0004)  (.0314)  1.00  3.19  53,452  .71 e  3.07 e 
September 30, 2007  1.00  .0471 f  g  .0471  (.0474)    (.0474)  1.00  4.86  42,641  .69 e  4.69 e,f 

Class R                         
September 30, 2011  $1.00  .0001  .0001  .0002  (.0001)    (.0001)  $1.00  .01  $18,508  .22 c  .01 c 
September 30, 2010  1.00  .0001  (.0003)  (.0002)  (.0005)    (.0005)  1.00  .06  16,283  .32 c  c,d 
September 30, 2009  1.00  .0060  (.0001)  .0059  (.0054)    (.0054)  1.00  .54  12,589  .84 c,e  .43 c,e 
September 30, 2008  1.00  .0277  (.0002)  .0275  (.0276)  (.0003)  (.0279)  1.00  2.83  5,564  1.06 e  2.54 e 
September 30, 2007  1.00  .0436 f  g  .0436  (.0439)    (.0439)  1.00  4.49  3,974  1.04 e  4.32 e,f 

Class T                         
September 30, 2011  $1.00  .0001  .0001  .0002  (.0001)    (.0001)  $1.00  .01  $33,941  .22 c  .01 c 
September 30, 2010  1.00  .0001  (.0003)  (.0002)  (.0005)    (.0005)  1.00  .06  31,034  .32 c  c,d 
September 30, 2009  1.00  .0073  (.0001)  .0072  (.0067)    (.0067)  1.00  .67  39,088  .74 c,e  .64 c,e 
September 30, 2008  1.00  .0302  (.0002)  .0300  (.0300)  (.0004)  (.0304)  1.00  3.08  20,037  .81 e  2.93 e 
September 30, 2007  1.00  .0461 f  g  .0461  (.0464)    (.0464)  1.00  4.75  14,743  .79 e  4.59 e,f 

 

See notes to financial highlights at the end of this section.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

32  33 

 



Financial highlights (Continued)

a Total return assumes dividend reinvestment and does not reflect the effect of sales charges.

b Includes amounts paid through expense offset arrangements (Note 2).

c Reflects a voluntary waiver of certain fund expenses in effect during the period relating to the enhancement of certain annualized net yields of the fund. As a result of such waivers, the expenses of each class reflect a reduction of the following amounts as a percentage of average net assets (Note 2):

  9/30/11  9/30/10  9/30/09 

Class A  0.28%  0.20%  0.02% 

Class B  0.78  0.70  0.17 

Class C  0.78  0.70  0.19 

Class M  0.43  0.35  0.05 

Class R  0.78  0.70  0.24 

Class T  0.53  0.45  0.09 

 

d Amount represents less than 0.01% of average net assets.

e Reflects an involuntary contractual expense limitation in effect during the period. For periods prior to September 30, 2009, certain fund expenses were waived in connection with the fund’s investment in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund. As a result of such limitation and/or waivers, the expenses of each class reflect a reduction of the following amounts:

  Percentage of 
  average net assets 

September 30, 2009  0.03% 

September 30, 2008  <0.01 

September 30, 2007  <0.01 

 

f Reflects a non-recurring reallocation of balance credits which amounted to $0.0003 per share and 0.03% of average net assets.

g Amount represents less than $0.0001 per share.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

34



Notes to financial statements 9/30/11

Note 1: Significant accounting policies

Putnam Money Market Fund (the fund), is a Massachusetts business trust, which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified open-end management investment company. The investment objective of the fund is to seek to provide as high a rate of current income that Putnam Investment Management, LLC (Putnam Management), the fund’s manager, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam Investments, LLC, believes is consistent with preservation of capital and maintenance of liquidity. The fund invests mainly in money market instruments that are high quality and have short-term maturities. The fund may invest without limit, and does invest significantly, in money market investments from the banking industry, such as certificates of deposit, commercial paper (including asset-backed commercial paper), U.S. government debt and repurchase agreements, corporate obligations and bankers acceptances. Putnam Management may consider, among other factors, credit, interest rate, and prepayment risks, as well as general market conditions, when deciding whether to buy or sell investments.

The fund offers class A, class B, class C, class M, class R and class T shares. Each class of shares is sold without a front-end sales charge. Class A, class M, class R and class T shares also are generally not subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. In addition to the standard offering of class A shares, they are also sold to certain college savings plans and other Putnam funds. Class B shares convert to class A shares after approximately eight years and are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge on certain redemptions. Class C shares have a one-year 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge on certain redemptions and do not convert to class A shares. Class R shares are not available to all investors. The expenses for class A, class B, class C, class M, class R and class T shares may differ based on each class’ distribution fee, which is identified in Note 2.

Investment income, realized gains and losses and expenses of the fund are borne pro-rata based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the fund, except that each class bears expenses unique to that class (including the distribution fees applicable to such classes). Each class votes as a class only with respect to its own distribution plan or other matters on which a class vote is required by law or determined by the Trustees. Shares of each class would receive their pro-rata share of the net assets of the fund, if the fund were liquidated. In addition, the Trustees declare separate dividends on each class of shares.

In the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that may include agreements to indemnify another party under given circumstances. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be, but have not yet been, made against the fund. However, the fund’s management team expects the risk of material loss to be remote.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The preparation of financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Subsequent events after the Statement of assets and liabilities date through the date that the financial statements were issued have been evaluated in the preparation of the financial statements. Unless otherwise noted, the “reporting period” represents the period from October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011.

A) Security valuation The valuation of the fund’s portfolio instruments is determined by means of the amortized cost method (which approximates market value) as set forth in Rule 2a–7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The amortized cost of an instrument is determined by valuing it at its original cost and thereafter amortizing any discount or premium from its face value at a constant rate until maturity and is generally categorized as a Level 2 security.

B) Joint trading account Pursuant to an exemptive order from the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), the fund may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account along with the cash of other registered investment companies and certain other accounts managed by Putnam Management. These balances may be invested in issues of short-term investments having maturities of up to 90 days.

C) Repurchase agreements The fund, or any joint trading account, through its custodian, receives delivery of the underlying securities, the market value of which at the time of purchase is required to be in an amount at least equal to the resale price, including accrued interest. Collateral for certain tri-party repurchase agreements is held

35



at the counterparty’s custodian in a segregated account for the benefit of the fund and the counterparty. Putnam Management is responsible for determining that the value of these underlying securities is at all times at least equal to the resale price, including accrued interest. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the other party to the agreement, retention of the collateral may be subject to legal proceedings.

D) Security transactions and related investment income Security transactions are recorded on the trade date (the date the order to buy or sell is executed). Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts from purchases of short-term investments are amortized/accreted at a constant rate until maturity. Gains or losses on securities sold are determined on the identified cost basis.

E) Interfund lending The fund, along with other Putnam funds, may participate in an interfund lending program pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the SEC. This program allows the fund to lend to other Putnam funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. Interest earned or paid on the interfund lending transaction will be based on the average of certain current market rates. During the reporting period, the fund did not utilize the program.

F) Line of credit The fund participates, along with other Putnam funds, in a $325 million unsecured committed line of credit and a $185 million unsecured uncommitted line of credit, both provided by State Street Bank and Trust Company (State Street). Borrowings may be made for temporary or emergency purposes, including the funding of shareholder redemption requests and trade settlements. Interest is charged to the fund based on the fund’s borrowing at a rate equal to the Federal Funds rate plus 1.25% for the committed line of credit and the Federal Funds rate plus 1.30% for the uncommitted line of credit. A closing fee equal to 0.02% of the committed line of credit and $50,000 for the uncommitted line of credit has been paid by the participating funds. In addition, a commitment fee of 0.13% per annum on any unutilized portion of the committed line of credit is allocated to the participating funds based on their relative net assets and paid quarterly. During the reporting period, the fund had no borrowings against these arrangements.

G) Federal taxes It is the policy of the fund to distribute all of its taxable income within the prescribed time period and otherwise comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), applicable to regulated investment companies. It is also the intention of the fund to distribute an amount sufficient to avoid imposition of any excise tax under Section 4982 of the Code. The fund is subject to the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification ASC 740 Income Taxes (ASC 740). ASC 740 sets forth a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The fund did not have a liability to record for any unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying financial statements. No provision has been made for federal taxes on income, capital gains or unrealized appreciation on securities held nor for excise tax on income and capital gains. Each of the fund’s federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

At September 30, 2011, the fund had a capital loss carryover of $1,381,629 available to the extent allowed by the Code to offset future net capital gain, if any. The amounts of the carryovers and the expiration dates are:

Loss carryover Expiration 

$39,633  September 30, 2016 

820,576  September 30, 2017 

521,420  September 30, 2019 

 

Under the recently enacted Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, the fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment tax years. As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may be more likely to expire unused. Additionally, post-enactment capital losses that are carried forward will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term as under previous law.

H) Distributions to shareholders Income dividends are recorded daily by the fund and are paid monthly. Distributions from capital gains, if any, are paid at least annually. The amount and character of income and gains to be distributed are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted

36



accounting principles. For the reporting period ended, there were no temporary or permanent differences. Reclassifications are made to the fund’s capital accounts to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers) under income tax regulations. For the reporting period ended, the fund required no such reclassifications.

The tax basis components of distributable earnings as of the close of the reporting period were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income  $9,187 
Capital loss carryforward  (1,381,629) 

 

The aggregate identified cost on a financial reporting and tax basis is the same.

Note 2: Management fee, administrative services and other transactions

The fund pays Putnam Management a management fee (based on the fund’s average net assets and computed and paid monthly) at annual rates that may vary based on the average of the aggregate net assets of most open-end funds, as defined in the fund’s management contract, sponsored by Putnam Management. Such annual rates may vary as follows:

0.440%  of the first $5 billion, 
0.390%  of the next $5 billion, 
0.340%  of the next $10 billion, 
0.290%  of the next $10 billion, 
0.240%  of the next $50 billion, 
0.220%  of the next $50 billion, 
0.210%  of the next $100 billion, 
0.205%  of any excess thereafter. 

 

Putnam Management has contractually agreed, through June 30, 2012, to waive fees or reimburse the fund’s expenses to the extent necessary to limit the cumulative expenses of the fund, exclusive of brokerage, interest, taxes, investment-related expenses, extraordinary expenses and payments under the fund’s investor servicing contract, investment management contract and distribution plans, on a fiscal year-to-date basis to an annual rate of 0.20% of the fund’s average net assets over such fiscal year-to-date period. During the reporting period, the fund’s expenses were not reduced as a result of this limit.

Putnam Management may from time to time voluntarily undertake to waive fees and/or reimburse certain fund expenses in order to enhance the annualized net yield for the fund. Any such waiver or reimbursement would be voluntary and may be modified or discontinued by Putnam Management at any time without notice. During the reporting period, the fund’s expenses were reduced by $5,924,605 as a result of this limit, and the net yield for the reporting period was 0.01%. This includes the following amounts per class of class specific distribution fees from the fund:

  Distribution fee waived 

Class A  $— 

Class B  148,772 

Class C  123,177 

Class M  47,944 

Class R  86,057 

Class T  85,026 

 

Putnam Investments Limited (PIL), an affiliate of Putnam Management, is authorized by the Trustees to manage a separate portion of the assets of the fund as determined by Putnam Management from time to time. Putnam Management pays a quarterly sub-management fee to PIL for its services at an annual rate of 0.40% of the average net assets of the portion of the fund managed by PIL.

The fund reimburses Putnam Management an allocated amount for the compensation and related expenses of certain officers of the fund and their staff who provide administrative services to the fund. The aggregate amount of all such reimbursements is determined annually by the Trustees.

37



Custodial functions for the fund’s assets are provided by State Street. Custody fees are based on the fund’s asset level, the number of its security holdings and transaction volumes.

Putnam Investor Services, Inc., an affiliate of Putnam Management, provides investor servicing agent functions to the fund. Putnam Investor Services, Inc. received fees for investor servicing based on the fund’s retail asset level, the number of shareholder accounts in the fund and the level of defined contribution plan assets in the fund. Investor servicing fees will not exceed an annual rate of 0.375% of the fund’s average net assets. The amounts incurred for investor servicing agent functions during the reporting period are included in Investor servicing fees in the Statement of operations.

The fund has entered into expense offset arrangements with Putnam Investor Services, Inc. and State Street whereby Putnam Investor Services, Inc.’s and State Street’s fees are reduced by credits allowed on cash balances. For the reporting period, the fund’s expenses were reduced by $20,026 under the expense offset arrangements.

Each independent Trustee of the fund receives an annual Trustee fee, of which $1,251, as a quarterly retainer, has been allocated to the fund, and an additional fee for each Trustees meeting attended. Trustees also are reimbursed for expenses they incur relating to their services as Trustees.

The fund has adopted a Trustee Fee Deferral Plan (the Deferral Plan) which allows the Trustees to defer the receipt of all or a portion of Trustees fees payable on or after July 1, 1995. The deferred fees remain invested in certain Putnam funds until distribution in accordance with the Deferral Plan.

The fund has adopted an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the Pension Plan) covering all Trustees of the fund who have served as a Trustee for at least five years and were first elected prior to 2004. Benefits under the Pension Plan are equal to 50% of the Trustee’s average annual attendance and retainer fees for the three years ended December 31, 2005. The retirement benefit is payable during a Trustee’s lifetime, beginning the year following retirement, for the number of years of service through December 31, 2006. Pension expense for the fund is included in Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of operations. Accrued pension liability is included in Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of assets and liabilities. The Trustees have terminated the Pension Plan with respect to any Trustee first elected after 2003.

The fund has adopted distribution plans (the Plans) with respect to its class B, class C, class M, class R and class T shares pursuant to Rule 12b–1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The purpose of the Plans is to compensate Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam Investments, LLC and Putnam Retail Management GP, Inc., for services provided and expenses incurred in distributing shares of the fund. The Plans provide for payments by the fund to Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership at an annual rate of up to 0.75%, 1.00%, 1.00%, 1.00% and 0.35% of the average net assets attributable to class B, class C, class M, class R and class T shares, respectively. The Trustees have approved payment by the fund at an annual rate of 0.50%, 0.50%, 0.15%, 0.50% and 0.25% of the average net assets attributable to class B, class C, class M, class R and class T shares, respectively.

For the reporting period, Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, acting as underwriter, received net commissions of $77,015 and $7,125, respectively, in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of class B and class C shares purchased by exchange from another Putnam fund.

A deferred sales charge of up to 1.00% for class A and class T shares and up to 0.15% for class M shares may be assessed on certain redemptions. For the reporting period, Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, acting as underwriter, received no monies in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of class A, class M or class T shares purchased by exchange from another Putnam fund.

Note 3: Purchases and sales of securities

During the reporting period, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales (including maturities) of investment securities (all short-term obligations) aggregated $147,197,736,241 and $147,582,509,718, respectively.

38



Note 4: Capital shares

At the close of the reporting period, there was an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized. Transactions in capital shares were as follows:

   Year ended 9/30/11   Year ended 9/30/10 

Class A  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount 

Shares sold  990,528,207  $990,528,207  1,180,161,205  $1,180,161,205 

Shares issued in connection with         
reinvestment of distributions  213,881  213,881  1,212,178  1,212,178 

   990,742,088  990,742,088  1,181,373,383  1,181,373,383 

Shares repurchased  (1,382,829,728)  (1,382,829,728)  (1,530,355,684)  (1,530,355,684) 

Net decrease  (392,087,640)  $(392,087,640)  (348,982,301)  $(348,982,301) 

 
   Year ended 9/30/11   Year ended 9/30/10 

Class B  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount 

Shares sold  18,097,439  $18,097,439  26,963,672  $26,963,672 

Shares issued in connection with         
reinvestment of distributions  3,174  3,174  23,770  23,770 

   18,100,613  18,100,613  26,987,442  26,987,442 

Shares repurchased  (27,561,663)  (27,561,663)  (55,861,947)  (55,861,947) 

Net decrease  (9,461,050)  $(9,461,050)  (28,874,505)  $(28,874,505) 

 
   Year ended 9/30/11   Year ended 9/30/10 

Class C  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount 

Shares sold  37,289,002  $37,289,002  19,900,410  $19,900,410 

Shares issued in connection with         
reinvestment of distributions  2,891  2,891  12,316  12,316 

   37,291,893  37,291,893  19,912,726  19,912,726 

Shares repurchased  (28,200,918)  (28,200,918)  (25,659,403)  (25,659,403) 

Net increase (decrease)  9,090,975  $9,090,975  (5,746,677)  $(5,746,677) 

 
   Year ended 9/30/11   Year ended 9/30/10 

Class M  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount 

Shares sold  27,735,752  $27,735,752  37,346,778  $37,346,778 

Shares issued in connection with         
reinvestment of distributions  3,841  3,841  23,205  23,205 

   27,739,593  27,739,593  37,369,983  37,369,983 

Shares repurchased  (32,448,948)  (32,448,948)  (47,632,333)  (47,632,333) 

Net decrease  (4,709,355)  $(4,709,355)  (10,262,350)  $(10,262,350) 

 
   Year ended 9/30/11   Year ended 9/30/10 

Class R  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount 

Shares sold  15,430,410  $15,430,410  19,239,520  $19,239,520 

Shares issued in connection with         
reinvestment of distributions  2,274  2,274  7,778  7,778 

   15,432,684  15,432,684  19,247,298  19,247,298 

Shares repurchased  (13,202,800)  (13,202,800)  (15,535,185)  (15,535,185) 

Net increase  2,229,884  $2,229,884  3,712,113  $3,712,113 

 

39



   Year ended 9/30/11   Year ended 9/30/10 

Class T  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount 

Shares sold  32,650,905  $32,650,905  17,248,155  $17,248,155 

Shares issued in connection with         
reinvestment of distributions  4,465  4,465  18,031  18,031 

   32,655,370  32,655,370  17,266,186  17,266,186 

Shares repurchased  (29,736,404)  (29,736,404)  (25,293,379)  (25,293,379) 

Net increase (decrease)  2,918,966  $2,918,966  (8,027,193)  $(8,027,193) 

 

Note 5: Investment in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund

The fund invested in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund, an open-end management investment company managed by Putnam Management. Investments in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund are valued at its closing net asset value each business day. Income distributions earned by the fund are recorded as interest income in the Statement of operations and totaled $53,806 for the reporting period. During the reporting period, cost of purchases and proceeds of sales of investments in Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund aggregated $498,215,560 and $401,169,543, respectively. Management fees charged to Putnam Money Market Liquidity Fund have been waived by Putnam Management.

Note 6: Market and credit risk

In the normal course of business, the fund trades financial instruments and enters into financial transactions where risk of potential loss exists due to changes in the market (market risk) or failure of the contracting party to the transaction to perform (credit risk). The fund may be exposed to additional credit risk that an institution or other entity with which the fund has unsettled or open transactions will default.

40



Federal tax information (Unaudited)

For the reporting period ended, pursuant to §871(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, the fund hereby designates $265,654 of distributions paid as qualifying to be taxed as interest-related dividends, and no monies to be taxed as short-term capital gain dividends for nonresident alien shareholders.

The Form 1099 that will be mailed to you in January 2012 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar 2011.

41



About the Trustees

Independent Trustees   
Name     
Year of birth     
Position held  Principal occupations during past five years  Other directorships 

Ravi Akhoury  Advisor to New York Life Insurance Company. Trustee of  Jacob Ballas Capital 
Born 1947  American India Foundation and of the Rubin Museum.  India, a non-banking 
Trustee since 2009  From 1992 to 2007, was Chairman and CEO of MacKay  finance company 
  Shields, a multi-product investment management firm  focused on private 
  with over $40 billion in assets under management.  equity advisory services; 
    RAGE Frameworks, 
    Inc., a private software 
    company 

Barbara M. Baumann  President and Owner of Cross Creek Energy Corporation,  SM Energy Company, a 
Born 1955  a strategic consultant to domestic energy firms and direct  domestic exploration 
Trustee since 2010  investor in energy projects. Trustee of Mount Holyoke  and production 
  College and member of the Investment Committee for the  company; UniSource 
  college’s endowment. Former Chair and current board  Energy Corporation, 
  member of Girls Incorporated of Metro Denver. Member of  an Arizona utility; CVR 
  the Finance Committee, The Children’s Hospital of Denver.  Energy, a petroleum 
    refiner and fertilizer 
    manufacturer 

Jameson A. Baxter  President of Baxter Associates, Inc., a private investment  None 
Born 1943  firm. Chair of Mutual Fund Directors Forum. Chair Emeritus   
Trustee since 1994,  of the Board of Trustees of Mount Holyoke College.   
Vice Chair from 2005  Director of the Adirondack Land Trust and Trustee of the   
to 2011, and Chair  Nature Conservancy’s Adirondack Chapter.   
since 2011     

Charles B. Curtis  Former President and Chief Operating Officer of the  Edison International; 
Born 1940  Nuclear Threat Initiative, a private foundation dealing  Southern California 
Trustee since 2001  with national security issues. Senior Advisor to the Center  Edison 
  for Strategic and International Studies. Member of the   
  Council on Foreign Relations.   

Robert J. Darretta  Health Care Industry Advisor to Permira, a global private  UnitedHealth 
Born 1946  equity firm. Until April 2007, was Vice Chairman of the  Group, a diversified 
Trustee since 2007  Board of Directors of Johnson & Johnson. Served as  health-care company 
  Johnson & Johnson’s Chief Financial Officer for a decade.   

John A. Hill  Founder and Vice-Chairman of First Reserve  Devon Energy 
Born 1942  Corporation, the leading private equity buyout firm  Corporation, a leading 
Trustee since 1985 and  focused on the worldwide energy industry. Serves as a  independent natural gas 
Chairman from 2000  Trustee and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Sarah  and oil exploration and 
to 2011  Lawrence College. Also a member of the Advisory Board  production company 
  of the Millstein Center for Corporate Governance and   
  Performance at the Yale School of Management.   

 

42



Name     
Year of birth     
Position held  Principal occupations during past five years  Other directorships 

Paul L. Joskow  Economist and President of the Alfred P. Sloan  TransCanada 
Born 1947  Foundation, a philanthropic institution focused primarily  Corporation, an energy 
Trustee since 1997  on research and education on issues related to science,  company focused on 
  technology, and economic performance. Elizabeth and  natural gas transmission 
  James Killian Professor of Economics, Emeritus at the  and power services; 
  Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Prior to  Exelon Corporation, an 
  2007, served as the Director of the Center for Energy and  energy company focused 
  Environmental Policy Research at MIT.  on power services 

Kenneth R. Leibler  Founder and former Chairman of Boston Options  Northeast Utilities, 
Born 1949  Exchange, an electronic marketplace for the trading  which operates New 
Trustee since 2006  of derivative securities. Vice Chairman of the Board of  England’s largest energy 
  Trustees of Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital in Boston,  delivery system 
  Massachusetts. Until November 2010, director of Ruder   
  Finn Group, a global communications and advertising firm.   

Robert E. Patterson  Senior Partner of Cabot Properties, LP and Co-Chairman  None 
Born 1945  of Cabot Properties, Inc., a private equity firm investing in   
Trustee since 1984  commercial real estate. Past Chairman and Trustee of the   
  Joslin Diabetes Center.   

George Putnam, III  Chairman of New Generation Research, Inc., a publisher  None 
Born 1951  of financial advisory and other research services, and   
Trustee since 1984  founder and President of New Generation Advisors, LLC,   
  a registered investment advisor to private funds.   
  Director of The Boston Family Office, LLC, a registered   
  investment advisor.   

W. Thomas Stephens  Retired as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Boise  TransCanadaPipelines 
Born 1942  Cascade, LLC, a paper, forest products, and timberland  Ltd., an energy 
Trustee from 1997 to 2008  assets company, in December 2008. Prior to 2010,  infrastructure company 
and since 2009  Director of Boise Inc., a manufacturer of paper and   
  packaging products.   

Interested Trustee     

Robert L. Reynolds*  President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam  None 
Born 1952  Investments since 2008. Prior to joining Putnam   
Trustee since 2008 and  Investments, served as Vice Chairman and Chief   
President of the Putnam  Operating Officer of Fidelity Investments from   
Funds since July 2009  2000 to 2007.   

 

The address of each Trustee is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.

As of September 30, 2011, there were 107 Putnam funds. All Trustees serve as Trustees of all Putnam funds.

Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, until his or her resignation, retirement at age 72, removal, or death.

* Mr. Reynolds is an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940) of the fund, Putnam Management, and/or Putnam Retail Management. He is President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam Investments, as well as the President of your fund and each of the other Putnam funds.

43



Officers

In addition to Robert L. Reynolds, the other officers of the fund are shown below:

Jonathan S. Horwitz (Born 1955)  Robert T. Burns (Born 1961) 
Executive Vice President, Principal Executive  Vice President and Chief Legal Officer 
Officer, Treasurer and Compliance Liaison  Since 2011 
Since 2004  General Counsel, Putnam Investments and 
  Putnam Management 
Steven D. Krichmar (Born 1958)   
Vice President and Principal Financial Officer  James P. Pappas (Born 1953) 
Since 2002  Vice President 
Chief of Operations, Putnam Investments and  Since 2004 
Putnam Management  Director of Trustee Relations, 
  Putnam Investments and Putnam Management 
Janet C. Smith (Born 1965)   
Vice President, Assistant Treasurer and  Judith Cohen (Born 1945) 
Principal Accounting Officer  Vice President, Clerk and Assistant Treasurer 
Since 2007  Since 1993 
Director of Fund Administration Services,   
Putnam Investments and Putnam Management  Michael Higgins (Born 1976) 
  Vice President, Senior Associate Treasurer and 
Beth S. Mazor (Born 1958)  Assistant Clerk 
Vice President  Since 2010 
Since 2002  Manager of Finance, Dunkin’ Brands (2008– 
Manager of Trustee Relations, Putnam  2010); Senior Financial Analyst, Old Mutual Asset 
Investments and Putnam Management  Management (2007–2008); Senior Financial 
  Analyst, Putnam Investments (1999–2007) 
Robert R. Leveille (Born 1969)   
Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer  Nancy E. Florek (Born 1957) 
Since 2007  Vice President, Assistant Clerk, Assistant 
Chief Compliance Officer, Putnam Investments,  Treasurer and Proxy Manager 
Putnam Management, and Putnam Retail  Since 2000 
Management   
  Susan G. Malloy (Born 1957) 
Mark C. Trenchard (Born 1962)  Vice President and Assistant Treasurer 
Vice President and BSA Compliance Officer  Since 2007 
Since 2002  Director of Accounting & Control Services, 
Director of Operational Compliance,  Putnam Management 
Putnam Investments and Putnam   
Retail Management   

 

The principal occupations of the officers for the past five years have been with the employers as shown above although in some cases, they have held different positions with such employers. The address of each Officer is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.

44



Fund information

Founded over 70 years ago, Putnam Investments was built around the concept that a balance between risk and reward is the hallmark of a well-rounded financial program. We manage over 100 funds across income, value, blend, growth, asset allocation, absolute return, and global sector categories.

Investment Manager  Paul L. Joskow  Mark C. Trenchard 
Putnam Investment  Kenneth R. Leibler  Vice President and 
Management, LLC  Robert E. Patterson  BSA Compliance Officer 
One Post Office Square  George Putnam, III   
Boston, MA 02109  Robert L. Reynolds  Robert T. Burns 
  W. Thomas Stephens  Vice President and 
Investment Sub-Manager    Chief Legal Officer 
Putnam Investments Limited  Officers   
57–59 St James’s Street  Robert L. Reynolds  James P. Pappas 
London, England SW1A 1LD  President  Vice President 
     
Marketing Services  Jonathan S. Horwitz  Judith Cohen 
Putnam Retail Management  Executive Vice President,  Vice President, Clerk and 
One Post Office Square  Principal Executive  Assistant Treasurer 
Boston, MA 02109  Officer, Treasurer and   
  Compliance Liaison  Michael Higgins 
Custodian    Vice President, Senior Associate 
State Street Bank  Steven D. Krichmar  Treasurer and Assistant Clerk 
and Trust Company  Vice President and   
  Principal Financial Officer  Nancy E. Florek 
Legal Counsel    Vice President, Assistant Clerk, 
Ropes & Gray LLP  Janet C. Smith  Assistant Treasurer and 
  Vice President, Assistant  Proxy Manager 
Independent Registered  Treasurer and Principal   
Public Accounting Firm  Accounting Officer  Susan G. Malloy 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    Vice President and 
  Beth S. Mazor  Assistant Treasurer 
Trustees  Vice President   
Jameson A. Baxter, Chair     
Ravi Akhoury  Robert R. Leveille   
Barbara M. Baumann  Vice President and   
Charles B. Curtis  Chief Compliance Officer   
Robert J. Darretta     
John A. Hill     

 

This report is for the information of shareholders of Putnam Money Market Fund. It may also be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, the most recent copy of Putnam’s Quarterly Performance Summary, and Putnam’s Quarterly Ranking Summary. For more recent performance, please visit putnam.com. Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund, which are described in its prospectus. For this and other information or to request a prospectus or summary prospectus, call 1-800-225-1581 toll free. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. The fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling 1-800-225-1581.





Item 2. Code of Ethics:
(a) The fund’s principal executive, financial and accounting officers are employees of Putnam Investment Management, LLC, the Fund’s investment manager. As such they are subject to a comprehensive Code of Ethics adopted and administered by Putnam Investments which is designed to protect the interests of the firm and its clients. The Fund has adopted a Code of Ethics which incorporates the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments with respect to all of its officers and Trustees who are employees of Putnam Investment Management, LLC. For this reason, the Fund has not adopted a separate code of ethics governing its principal executive, financial and accounting officers.

(c) In May 2008, the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investment Management, LLC was updated in its entirety to include the amendments adopted in August 2007 as well as a several additional technical, administrative and non-substantive changes. In May of 2009, the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investment Management, LLC was amended to reflect that all employees will now be subject to a 90-day blackout restriction on holding Putnam open-end funds, except for portfolio managers and their supervisors (and each of their immediate family members), who will be subject to a one-year blackout restriction on the funds that they manage or supervise. In June 2010, the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments was updated in its entirety to include the amendments adopted in May of 2009 and to change certain rules and limits contained in the Code of Ethics. In addition, the updated Code of Ethics included numerous technical, administrative and non-substantive changes, which were intended primarily to make the document easier to navigate and understand. In July 2011, the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments was updated to reflect several technical, administrative and non-substantive changes resulting from changes in employee titles.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert:
The Funds’ Audit and Compliance Committee is comprised solely of Trustees who are “independent” (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the “Regulations”)). The Trustees believe that each of the members of the Audit and Compliance Committee also possess a combination of knowledge and experience with respect to financial accounting matters, as well as other attributes, that qualify them for service on the Committee. In addition, the Trustees have determined that each of Mr. Leibler, Mr. Hill, Mr. Darretta and Ms. Baumann qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” (as such term has been defined by the Regulations) based on their review of his or her pertinent experience and education. The SEC has stated that the designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 of Form N-CSR does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on such person as a member of the Audit and Compliance Committee and the Board of Trustees in the absence of such designation or identification.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services:
The following table presents fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for services rendered to the fund by the fund’s independent auditor:


Fiscal year ended Audit Fees Audit-Related Fees Tax Fees All Other Fees

September 30, 2011 $122,179 $-- $4,270 $ —
September 30, 2010 $150,747 $-- $2,591 $3,340*


*   Includes fees of $3,340 billed by the fund’s independent auditor to the fund for procedures necessitated by regulatory and litigation matters for the fiscal year ended and September 30, 2010. These fees were reimbursed to the fund by Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“Putnam Management”).
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, the fund’s independent auditor billed aggregate non-audit fees in the amounts of $263,101 and $405,584 respectively, to the fund, Putnam Management and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with Putnam Management that provides ongoing services to the fund.

Audit Fees represent fees billed for the fund’s last two fiscal years relating to the audit and review of the financial statements included in annual reports and registration statements, and other services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-Related Fees represent fees billed in the fund’s last two fiscal years for services traditionally performed by the fund’s auditor, including accounting consultation for proposed transactions or concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and other audit or attest services not required by statute or regulation.

Tax Fees represent fees billed in the fund’s last two fiscal years for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice services. Tax planning and tax advice services include assistance with tax audits, employee benefit plans and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.

All Other Fees represent fees billed for services relating to procedures necessitated by regulatory and litigation matters.

Pre-Approval Policies of the Audit and Compliance Committee. The Audit and Compliance Committee of the Putnam funds has determined that, as a matter of policy, all work performed for the funds by the funds’ independent auditors will be pre-approved by the Committee itself and thus will generally not be subject to pre-approval procedures.

The Audit and Compliance Committee also has adopted a policy to pre-approve the engagement by Putnam Management and certain of its affiliates of the funds’ independent auditors, even in circumstances where pre-approval is not required by applicable law. Any such requests by Putnam Management or certain of its affiliates are typically submitted in writing to the Committee and explain, among other things, the nature of the proposed engagement, the estimated fees, and why this work should be performed by that particular audit firm as opposed to another one. In reviewing such requests, the Committee considers, among other things, whether the provision of such services by the audit firm are compatible with the independence of the audit firm.

The following table presents fees billed by the fund’s independent auditor for services required to be approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.


Fiscal year ended Audit-Related Fees Tax Fees All Other Fees Total Non-Audit Fees

September 30, 2011 $ — $112,505 $ — $ —
September 30, 2010 $ — $243,601 $ — $ —

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable
Item 6. Schedule of Investments:
The registrant’s schedule of investments in unaffiliated issuers is included in the report to shareholders in Item 1 above.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures For Closed-End Management Investment Companies:

Not applicable
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies
Not Applicable
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers:

Not applicable
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:
Not applicable
Item 11. Controls and Procedures:
(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the design and operation of such procedures are generally effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting: Not applicable
Item 12. Exhibits:
(a)(1) The Code of Ethics of The Putnam Funds, which incorporates the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments, is filed herewith.

(a)(2) Separate certifications for the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.

(b) The certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Putnam Money Market Fund
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Janet C. Smith
Janet C. Smith
Principal Accounting Officer

Date: November 29, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By (Signature and Title):
/s/Jonathan S. Horwitz
Jonathan S. Horwitz
Principal Executive Officer

Date: November 29, 2011
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Steven D. Krichmar
Steven D. Krichmar
Principal Financial Officer

Date: November 29, 2011