XML 53 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 10. Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows FASB ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, (formerly SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements,”) which among other things, requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities carried at fair value. ASC 820-10 establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability utilized in measuring financial instruments at fair value. The three broad levels of the hierarchy are as follows:

Level I – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date. The type of financial instruments included in Level I are highly liquid cash instruments with quoted prices such as G-7 government, agency securities, listed equities and money market securities, as well as listed derivative instruments.

Level II – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these financial instruments include cash instruments for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, derivative instruments whose fair value have been derived using a model where inputs to the model are directly observable in the market, or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, and instruments that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed. Instruments which are generally included in this category are corporate bonds and loans, mortgage whole loans, municipal bonds and OTC derivatives.

Level III – Instruments that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These financial instruments do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Instruments that are included in this category generally include certain commercial mortgage loans, certain private equity investments, distressed debt, non-investment grade residual interests in securitizations, as well as certain highly structured OTC derivative contracts.

 

The results of the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2013, are as follows:

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:

 

                                 
    Securities AFS Fair Value Measurements Using  
    Carrying
Value
    Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
Other
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
    (In thousands)  

U.S. Treasury

  $ 2,001     $ —       $ 2,001     $ —    

U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises

    175,215       —         175,215       —    

SBA Backed Securities

    8,014       —         8,014       —    

U.S. Government Agency and Sponsored Mortgage Backed Securities

    1,165,036       —         1,165,036       —    

Privately Issued Residential Mortgage Backed Securities

    2,820       —         2,820       —    

Obligations Issued by States and Political Subdivisions

    51,353       —         1,717       49,636  

Other Debt Securities

    2,238       —         2,238       —    

Equity Securities

    583       241       —         342  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $  1,407,260     $  241     $  1,357,041     $  49,978  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
 
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis:  
         

Impaired Loans

    3,758       —         —         3,758  

Impaired loan balances represent those collateral dependent loans where management has estimated the credit loss by comparing the loan’s carrying value against the expected realizable fair value of the collateral. Specific provisions relate to impaired loans recognized for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 amounted to $24,000. The Company uses appraisals, discounted as appropriate, based on management’s observations of the local real estate market for loans in this category.

There were no transfers between level 1 and 2 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis during the three month period ended March 31, 2013.

The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value (dollars in thousands). Management continues to monitor the assumptions used to value the assets listed below.

 

                     

Asset

  Fair Value     Valuation Technique   Unobservable Input  

Unobservable Input

Value or Range

Securities AFS(4)

  $ 49,978     Discounted cash flow   Discount rate   0% -1% (3)

Impaired Loans

    3,758     Appraisal of collateral (1)   Appraisal adjustments (2)   0%-25% discount

 

(1) Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various Level 3 inputs which are not identifiable.
(2) Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated expenses.
(3) Weighted averages
(4) Municipal securities generally have maturities of one year or less and, therefore, the amortized cost equates to the fair value.

 

The changes in Level 3 securities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013 are shown in the table below:

 

                                 
    Auction  Rate
Securities
    Obligations
Issued by States
& Political
Subdivisions
    Equity
Securities
    Total  
          (In thousands)              

Balance at December 31, 2012

  $  3,963     $  49,477     $  342     $  53,782  

Purchases

    —         6,179       —         6,179  

Maturities and calls

    —         (9,974     —         ( 9,974

Amortization

    —         (9     —         (9

Changes in fair value

    —         —         —         —    
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2013

  $ 3,963     $ 45,673     $ 342     $ 49,978  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The amortized cost of Level 3 securities was $50,701,000 at March 31, 2013 with an unrealized loss of $723,000. The securities in this category are generally equity investments, municipal securities with no readily determinable fair value or failed auction rate securities. Management evaluated the fair value of these securities based on an evaluation of the underlying issuer, prevailing rates and market liquidity.

The changes in Level 3 securities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, are shown in the table below:

 

                                 
    Auction Rate
Securities
    Obligations
Issued by States
& Political
Subdivisions
    Equity
Securities
    Total  
          (In thousands)              

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $  3,725     $ 14,772     $ 417     $ 18,914  

Purchases

    —         12,730       —         12,730  

Maturities and calls

    —         (3,434     (23     (3,457

Amortization

    —         (11     —         (11
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2012

  $ 3,725     $ 24,057     $ 394     $ 28,176  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The amortized cost of Level 3 securities was $29,135,000 at March 31, 2012 with an unrealized loss of $959,000. The securities in this category are generally equity investments, municipal securities with no readily determinable fair value or failed auction rate securities. Management evaluated the fair value of these securities based on an evaluation of the underlying issuer, prevailing rates and market liquidity.