Fair Value Measurements

3 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2017

The FASB issued fair value guidance that establishes how reporting entities should measure fair value for measurement and disclosure purposes. The guidance establishes a common definition of fair value applicable to all assets and liabilities measured at fair value and prioritizes the inputs into valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Accordingly, the Company uses valuation techniques which maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1: Inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to the Company for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active and inactive markets or that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.

The table below summarizes the Company’s cash equivalents, Contingent Consideration and Interest Rate Swap measured at estimated fair value (all other assets and liabilities measured at fair value are immaterial) (in thousands).




	Estimated Fair Value Measurement as of October 31, 2017
Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Money Market	$	3,010	$	3,010	$	—	$	—
Commercial Paper	$	2,401	$	—	$	2,401	$	—
Certificates of Deposit	$	2,406	$	—	$	2,406	$	—
Liabilities:
Contingent Consideration	$	23,754	$	—	$	—	$	23,754

	Estimated Fair Value Measurement as of July 31, 2017
Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Money Market	$	3,008	$	3,008	$	—	$	—
Commercial Paper	$	2,401	$	—	$	2,401	$	—
Certificates of Deposit	$	2,403	$	—	$	2,403	$	—
Interest Rate Swap	$	236	$	—	$	236	$	—
Liabilities:
Contingent Consideration	$	27,400	$	—	$	—	$	27,400

	Estimated Fair Value Measurement as of October 31, 2016
Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Money Market	$	3,001	$	3,001	$	—	$	—
Commercial Paper	$	2,401	$	—	$	2,401	$	—
Certificates of Deposit	$	2,403	$	—	$	2,403	$	—
Liabilities:
Contingent Consideration	$	11,400	$	—	$	—	$	11,400
Interest Rate Swap	$	1,990	$	—	$	1,990	$	—

The Company’s cash equivalents and Interest Rate Swap are measured utilizing quoted market prices or pricing models whereby all significant inputs are either observable or corroborated by observable market data. The Interest Rate Swap was an instrument assumed in the Whistler Blackcomb acquisition that was a C$125.0 million fixed swap on the floating interest rate for the assumed Whistler Credit Agreement, and was originally set to expire in September 2020. However, the Company settled the Interest Rate Swap in September 2017 and therefore no longer utilized an Interest Rate Swap as of October 31, 2017. Interest Rate Swap settlements and changes in estimated fair value are recognized in interest expense, net on the Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations.

The changes in Contingent Consideration during the three months ended October 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):




Balance as of July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively	$	27,400		$	11,100
Payments	(3,646		)	—
Change in estimated fair value	—			300
Balance as of October, 2017 and 2016, respectively	$	23,754		$	11,400

The lease for Park City provides for participating contingent payments (the “Contingent Consideration”) to the landlord of 42% of the amount by which EBITDA for the Park City resort operations, as calculated under the lease, exceeds approximately $35 million, as established at the transaction date, with such threshold amount subsequently increased annually by an inflation linked index and a 10% adjustment for any capital improvements or investments made under the lease by the Company. The estimated fair value of Contingent Consideration includes the future period resort operations of Park City in the calculation of EBITDA on which participating contingent payments are made, which is determined on the basis of estimated subsequent year performance, escalated by an assumed growth factor. The Company estimated the fair value of the Contingent Consideration payments using an option pricing valuation model. Key assumptions included a discount rate of 10.2%, volatility of 16.0% and future period Park City EBITDA and capital expenditures, which are unobservable inputs and thus are considered Level 3 inputs. The Company prepared a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the effect that changes on certain key assumptions would have on the estimated fair value of the Contingent Consideration. A change in the discount rate of 100 basis points or a 5% change in estimated subsequent year performance would result in a change in the estimated fair value within the range of approximately $4.5 million to $6.5 million.

Contingent Consideration is classified as a liability, and therefore the liability is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved. During the three months ended October 31, 2017, the Company made a payment to the landlord for Contingent Consideration of approximately $3.6 million, resulting in an estimated fair value of the Contingent Consideration of approximately $23.8 million, which is reflected in other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References + Details