XML 56 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued fair value guidance that establishes how reporting entities should measure fair value for measurement and disclosure purposes. The guidance establishes a common definition of fair value applicable to all assets and liabilities measured at fair value and prioritizes the inputs into valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Accordingly, the Company uses valuation techniques which maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1: Inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to the Company for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active and inactive markets or that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.

The table below summarizes the Company’s cash equivalents and Contingent Consideration measured at fair value (all other assets and liabilities measured at fair value are immaterial) (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurement as of January 31, 2015
 
Description
 
Balance at January 31, 2015
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money Market
 
$
7,578

 
$
7,578

 
$

 
$

 
Commercial Paper
 
$
2,401

 
$

 
$
2,401

 
$

 
Certificates of Deposit
 
$
2,900

 
$

 
$
2,900

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent Consideration
 
$
6,000

 
$

 
$

 
$
6,000

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurement as of July 31, 2014
 
Description
 
Balance at July 31, 2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money Market
 
$
9,022

 
$
9,022

 
$

 
$

 
Commercial Paper
 
$
630

 
$

 
$
630

 
$

 
Certificates of Deposit
 
$
880

 
$

 
$
880

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent Consideration
 
$
10,500

 
$

 
$

 
$
10,500

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurement as of January 31, 2014
 
Description
 
Balance at January 31, 2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money Market
 
$
9,023

 
$
9,023

 
$

 
$

 
Commercial Paper
 
$
630

 
$

 
$
630

 
$

 
Certificates of Deposit
 
$
630

 
$

 
$
630

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent Consideration
 
$
9,100

 
$

 
$

 
$
9,100



The Company’s cash equivalents are measured utilizing quoted market prices or pricing models whereby all significant inputs are either observable or corroborated by observable market data. 

The changes in Contingent Consideration during the six months ended January 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

Balance as of July 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively
$
10,500

$
9,100

Change in fair value
(4,500
)

Balance as of January 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively
$
6,000

$
9,100


The lease for Canyons provides for participating contingent payments to Talisker of 42% of the amount by which EBITDA for the resort operations, as calculated under the lease, exceed approximately $35 million, with such threshold amount increased by an inflation linked index and a 10% adjustment for any capital improvements or investments made under the lease by the Company (the "Contingent Consideration"). The fair value of Contingent Consideration includes the resort operations of Park City in the calculation of EBITDA on which participating contingent payments are made, and increases the EBITDA threshold before which participating contingent payments are made equal to 10% of the purchase price paid by the Company, plus future capital expenditures. The Company estimated the fair value of the Contingent Consideration payments using an option pricing valuation model. Key assumptions included a discount rate of 11.5%, volatility of 20.0%, and credit risk of 3.0%. The model also incorporates assumptions for EBITDA and capital expenditures which are unobservable inputs and thus are considered Level 3 inputs. As Contingent Consideration is classified as a liability, the liability is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved. During the six months ended January 31, 2015, the Company recorded a decrease of $4.5 million in the estimated fair value of the participating contingent payments, and recorded the related gain in income from operations. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration is $6.0 million as of January 31, 2015 and this liability is recorded in other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets.