COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are a party to certain financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial position. The contract amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement that we have in this class of financial instruments.

Many of our lending relationships contain both funded and unfunded elements. The funded portion is reflected on our balance sheet. The unfunded portion of these commitments is not recorded on our balance sheet until a draw is made under the loan facility. Since many of the commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements.

A summary of the total unfunded, or off-balance sheet, credit extension commitments follows:



Dollars in thousands	March 31, 2017
Commitments to extend credit:
Revolving home equity and credit card lines	$	64,262
Construction loans	46,643
Other loans	113,035
Standby letters of credit	3,301
Total	$	227,241

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. We evaluate each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if we deem necessary upon extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, equipment or real estate.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party.

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.

Litigation

On May 13, 2014, the ResCap Liquidating Trust (“ResCap”), as successor to Residential Funding Company, LLC f/k/a Residential Funding Corporation (“RFC”), filed a complaint against Summit Financial Mortgage, LLC (“Summit Mortgage”), a former residential mortgage subsidiary of Summit whose operations were discontinued in 2007, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and subsequently amended its complaint on July 25, 2014.

Furthermore, on January 23, 2017, ResCap, as successor to RFC (together with RFC, the "RFC Parties"), filed a complaint against Summit Community Bank, Inc., as successor to Shenandoah Valley Community Bank (“Summit”), in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (collectively, the “ResCap Litigation”). Additional information regarding the ResCap Litigation is included under the caption “Legal Contingencies” in Note 17 of our consolidated financial statements beginning on page 92 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

On April 24, 2017, Summit Community Bank, Inc. entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with the RFC parties with respect to the Rescap Litigation. Under the Settlement Agreement, Summit Community Bank agreed to pay $9.9 million to fully resolve all claims by the RFC Parties, and to avoid the further costs, disruption, and distraction of defending the Rescap Litigation. Summit recorded a charge to noninterest expense in its consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 to recognize this settlement.

We are not a party to any other litigation except for matters that arise in the normal course of business. While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate resolution or range of financial liability with respect to these contingent matters, in the opinion of management, the outcome of these matters will not have a significant adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.