UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant x | |||
| |||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o | |||
| |||
Check the appropriate box: | |||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement | ||
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | ||
o |
Definitive Proxy Statement | ||
x |
Definitive Additional Materials | ||
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 | ||
| |||
CMS ENERGY CORPORATION | |||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | |||
| |||
| |||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) | |||
| |||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | |||
x |
No fee required. | ||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | ||
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |
|
|
| |
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |
|
|
| |
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |
|
|
| |
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |
|
|
| |
|
(5) |
Total fee paid: | |
|
|
| |
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | ||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | ||
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: | |
|
|
| |
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |
|
|
| |
|
(3) |
Filing Party: | |
|
|
| |
|
(4) |
Date Filed: | |
|
|
| |
I hope you are well and wanted to give you a heads up that the proxy statement for CMS Energy was publicly released and can be located on our website at this link.
Youll note that proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4 align with our company and our shareowners best interests, while Proposal 5 does not. Youll find on our website at this link, that we provide significant public disclosures regarding our companys political activities, which appropriately address the concerns cited in Proposal 5. We strongly feel that any additional reporting would be unnecessary and would hinder our ability to engage on critical energy policy matters. We ask that you VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 5.
Please feel free to circulate the attached letter to your colleagues for review as your company deliberates your vote for each proposal. We would be happy to discuss any concerns or questions you may have regarding these proposals.
Thank you,
Sri Maddipati
CMS Energy | Vice President, Treasurer and Investor Relations
T: +1 (517) 788-0635
March 19, 2020
Dear Valued Shareowner,
Thank you for holding our company accountable in delivering on our commitments to our shareowners, which include consistent industry-leading results and world class performance. As a valued shareowner of CMS Energy, we wanted to be sure you received our proxy statement, which is now live on our website at www.cmsenergy.com.
This year, 5 proposals have been introduced. Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4 align with our company values and include strong governance by a diverse Board of Directors, performance-based executive compensation, an independent public auditing firm, and a performance incentive plan that aligns the interests and future success of our employees, our company and you, our shareowners.
However, Proposal 5 does NOT align with our companys strategy or our shareowners best interests, and we ask that you consider voting as the Board recommends: AGAINST Proposal 5. We provide detailed governance policies and disclosures regarding our companys political activities on our website. Here, youll find an abundance of public disclosures that appropriately adhere to existing rules and statutory requirements. We strongly feel reporting required by Proposal 5 would be unnecessary and could hinder future engagement in developing smart energy policy for the state of Michigan.
Please consider voting as the Board recommends on Proposal 5, and please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions or concerns you may have. Were happy to engage.
Thank you,
NHU8A+