EX-99 2 c50437_ex99.htm

Public Service Enterprise Group

Merrill Lynch

Power & Gas Leaders Conference

New York City

September 25, 2007

Forward-Looking Statement

The statements contained in this communication about our and our
subsidiaries’ future performance, including, without limitation, future
revenues, earnings, strategies, prospects and all other statements that
are not purely historical, are forward-looking statements for purposes of
the safe harbor provisions under The Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995.  Although we believe that our expectations are
based on information currently available and on reasonable
assumptions, we can give no assurance they will be achieved.  There
are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from the forward-looking statements made herein. A
discussion of some of these risks and uncertainties is contained in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent reports on Form 10-Q and
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
and available on our website: http://www.pseg.com.    These documents
address in further detail our business, industry issues and other factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in
this communication. In addition, any forward-looking statements included
herein represent our estimates only as of today and should not be relied
upon as representing our estimates as of any subsequent date.  While
we may elect to update forward-looking statements from time to time, we
specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our estimates
change, unless otherwise required by applicable securities laws.

GAAP Disclaimer

PSEG presents Operating Earnings in addition to its Net Income reported
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (GAAP). Operating Earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure that
differs from Net Income because it excludes the impact of the sale of
certain non-core domestic and international assets and costs stemming
from the terminated merger agreement with Exelon Corporation. PSEG
presents Operating Earnings because management believes that it is
appropriate for investors to consider results excluding these items in
addition to the results reported in accordance with GAAP. PSEG believes
that the non-GAAP financial measure of Operating Earnings provides a
consistent and comparable measure of performance of its businesses to
help shareholders understand performance trends. This information is
not intended to be viewed as an alternative to GAAP information. The last
slide in this presentation includes a list of items excluded from Net Income
to reconcile to Operating Earnings, with a reference to that slide included
on each of the slides where the non-GAAP information appears. These
slides are only intended to be reviewed in conjunction with the oral
presentation to which they relate.

PSEG Strategic Overview

Ralph Izzo

Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer

PSEG Overview

Electric Customers: 2.1M

Gas Customers: 1.7M

Nuclear Capacity: 3,500 MW

Total Capacity: 13,600 MW

Traditional T&D

Leveraged
Leases

2007E Operating Earnings⁽⁴⁾ ^: $1,245M - $1,370M

2007 EPS Guidance⁽⁴⁾ ^: $4.90 - $5.30

Assets (as of 06/30/07): $28.5B

Market Capitalization (as of 9/18/07): $22.25B

Domestic/Int’l
Energy

Regional
Wholesale Energy

Operating Earnings = Earnings Available and Excludes:

(1) Merger Costs of $1M

(2) Loss from Discontinued Operations of $239M

(3) Loss on Sale of RGE of $178M and Income from Discontinued Operations of $226M

Includes Operating Earnings from Global of $167M, Resources of $63M and Energy Holdings of $(3)M

(4) Includes the parent impact of $(55)M –$(45)M

2006 Operating Earnings: $262M⁽¹⁾ $515M⁽²⁾ $227M⁽³⁾

2007 Guidance: $340M - $360M $840M - $920M $120M - $135M

PSEG over the past year …

… has positioned itself to be ready for the future.

Smooth transition in operations

Management in place

PSEG Power to resume independent operation of nuclear capacity by
year-end

PSE&G national ReliabilityOne Award winner, two years running

Partnering with NJ to meet environmental objectives in cost effective
manner

Investing in energy efficiency

Investing in renewable energy resources

Redeploying capital at PSEG Energy Holdings

Balance sheet strengthened

The current business environment …

Convergence of market forces and policy creates
the need to address:

Environmental challenges

A carbon constrained future

Critical infrastructure needs

Reliability and aging plant

Capacity requirements in constrained markets

… creates opportunities for PSEG’s long-term growth.

Climate change is the preeminent issue of our time …

The issue cuts across the PSEG group of companies

Three critical strategies are required to meet carbon
reduction goals:

Conservation

Renewables

Clean, zero and low-carbon central station electric
generating capacity

… with our response defining the future of the company.

Business as usual GHG emissions increase…

GHG: Greenhouse Gas

U.S. GHG Emissions 2004 – 2030

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

Residential

Commercial

Industrial

Transportation

Electric Power

Total

34% Increase in CO₂

emissions by 2030

The Energy Information

Administration projects a 34%

increase in CO₂ emissions from

2004 levels in the business as

usual case (no climate policy)

… to unacceptably high levels based upon recent findings
of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change.

EPRI has assessed reduction opportunities in the US
Power sector, …

Source: Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI): Electric Technology in a Carbon Constrained Future
CCS: Carbon Capture and Sequestration
PHEV: Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles
DER: Distributed Energy Resource

… carefully noting that a multifaceted approach is needed.

Western Regional
Climate Action Initiative

Powering the Plains

Regional Greenhouse

Gas Initiative

Climate

Action Plans

(includes all states

in regional programs

except N & S Dakota)

RPS

standards
(plus
VT (goal),
MA, RI, CT,
NJ, DE,
MD, DC)

States

developing

greenhouse

gas registries

California

motor vehicle

CO₂ emissions
standards (plus
VT, MA, RI, CT,
NJ, ME)

States are not waiting for federal action …

… with NE and California leading the way to cap greenhouse
gas emissions.

RPS: Renewable Portfolio Standard

2.4

5.6

10.7

2.7

1.0

0.5

0.6

0.9

0.5

0.4

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Year Online

Waste Coal*

Other

Solar

Water

Wind

Planned Renewable Generation

* Waste coal meets Pennsylvania renewable standards

Source: Platts NewGen, December 2006

U.S. RPS Requirements by Region

2006 - 2015

Twenty-two states have Renewable Portfolio Standards …

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

California

New England

Mid-Atlantic

New York

Texas

Southwest

Rockies

Midwest

Northwest

Share of US
power demand

Source: GE Energy Financial Services

… and developers are responding to these Standards.

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) for the power
sector is real …

Agreement between 10 northeast states to cap CO₂
emissions from power plants

Emissions capped at 2000-2004 baseline levels in 2009

- NJ cap = 22.9 million tons

Reduce CO₂ emissions by a total of 10% during 2015 –
2018

Allowance distribution methodology, “Leakage”, and
harmonizing with a national program are major concerns

NJ RGGI legislation and regulations are planned for Nov
2007

… and on schedule to go into effect January 1, 2009.

A key element of any Cap and Trade approach is the
allowance distribution methodology.

Different approaches have been debated:

Grandfathered (Historical)

Updated

Input

Output

Auction

RGGI states are going down path of 100% auction

The price of the credits, however, is independent of the
allocation method and determined primarily by the level of
the CO₂cap.

Leakage needs to be addressed …

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

(6,000,000)

(5,000,000)

(4,000,000)

(3,000,000)

(2,000,000)

(1,000,000)

Leakage - Emissions Increases at Out of State Plants Caused by RGGI

NJ Emissions Reduced Caused by RGGI

RGGI Will Result in

a Net

Increase

CO2 Emissions

Based on RGGI State Workgroup data, RGGI results in a net increase in emissions when comparing the RGGI Reference

Case versus RGGI Package Case 10/2006 Model Runs. Leakage offsets any benefits of the RGGI program for NJ.

… or RGGI states risk increased consumer costs AND
increased CO₂ emissions.

New Jersey climate initiatives …

Energy Master Plan – No explicit CO₂ target, but:

20% energy efficiency by 2020

Calls for 20% renewables by 2020

NJ Global Warming Response Act:

Stabilization of economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions at
1990 levels by 2020.

Reduction of economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions to 80%
below 2006 levels by 2050.

Establishes emissions portfolio standard for suppliers of power
into NJ

… present numerous opportunities for PSE&G and PSEG
Power.

New Jersey emissions differ significantly from national
norms…

100

150

200

250

1990

1994

1998

2002

2006

2010

2014

2018

2022

2026

2030

2034

2038

2042

2046

2050

Business as Usual

1990 Level

80% Below 2006 Level

15.1%

17.7%

Transportation

Residential

Industrial

Commercial

Note: 2006 Emissions from transportation
sector, and electric power generation
attributed to end user

… with a large contribution from the transportation sector.

PSE&G has proposed a 3-pronged approach to help meet
State targets …

Source: Global Energy Partners, LLC

… with energy efficiency as the top priority.

NJ greenhouse gas emissions and goals …

PSEG Conceptual Reductions

200

180

160

140

120

100

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

150

155

160

165

170

175

180

185

BAU

PSEG

13.3

PSEG Reductions

Energy Master
Plan Goal

NJ Global Warming
Response Act

(1990 levels by
2020)

Business as Usual

New Nuclear Plant (8.2 MM tons)

Annual tons of CO

Reductions in 2020

Energy Efficiency (4.75 MM tons)

Solar Program (0.32 MM tons)

… represent a formidable challenge to achieve in the
absence of additional nuclear power.

2004 Emission Rate Ranking

(24 largest Generating Companies in PJM)

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Policymakers are looking to Cap and Trade for the power
industry to reduce CO₂ emissions.

PSEG’s generation carbon intensity is lower than many
competitors and benefits from virtually any form of carbon
restrictions.

The potential impact of CO₂on PSEG Power…

$7.20

100%

Total

$0.00

$0.0

Nuclear

$1.60

$4.0

40%

Gas CC

$0.60

$6.0

10%

CTs

$5.00

$10.0

50%

Coal

Impact

$/MWh

On margin
(approximate)

Dispatch curve implication @ $10/ton*

By Fuel Type

$12.0

$18.0

$30.0

@$30

$4.0

$6.0

$10.0

@$10

$2.0

$3.0

$5.0

@$5

Price ($/MWh)

0.4

0.6

1.0

Carbon tons/MWh

CTs

Coal

PSEG Power Generation by Fuel

55%

27%

16%

Oil 1%

Pumped
Storage
1%

Nuclear

Coal

Gas

Total GWh: 53,617

… is mitigated by a low-carbon generation portfolio.

* For illustration purposes – potential impact of CO₂ on power prices with current dispatch – not an indication of net effect on income.

PSE&G – Responding to environmental challenges …

Conservation through energy efficiency improvements
and investment in hybrids, electric-drive bucket trucks
and alternative fuels will cut carbon emissions by
140,000 tons over 10 years

Proposed investing $100 million in solar initiative that
would meet 30 MW (50%) of renewable requirements
over 2009-2010

Advocating for direct investment by utilities in
customer efficiency programs

Most cost effective means of meeting State goals

… and playing a key role in designing programs to meet
State goals.

Summary

States are not waiting for federal government to take action on
climate issues

Key policy focus on electric sector is:

Energy efficiency

Renewables

New nuclear

Carbon capture/storage

PSEG is well positioned:

Generating fleet less carbon intensive than many competitors

Policymakers need utility patient capital for investments in energy
efficiency and renewables

With a carbon constrained future, PSEG’s Salem/Hope Creek a
good location for new nuclear in latter part of next decade

PSEG – Meeting commitments

Results on track to meet earnings guidance

Meeting commitment to system reliability with major expansion of
transmission system

Addressing NJ’s clean energy commitments

Solar initiative

PSE&G to use more energy efficient equipment and vehicles

Focus on core businesses

Transmission investment

Hudson environmental commitment

Electroandes sale

Meeting our balance sheet goals

S&P outlook revised to stable; commercial paper ratings upgraded

Strong earnings growth in 2007 and 2008 …

196

227

347

262

446

515

120-135

340-360

840-920

(71)

(66)

(55)-(45)

2005

2006

2007E

2008E

$5.60 - $6.10

$3.77*

$3.71**

$4.90 - $5.30

Holdings

PSE&G

Power

Parent

Operating Earnings by Subsidiary

37%

15%

* 2005, as reported: Excludes ($0.14) Merger Costs, ($0.07) Cumulative Effect of an Accounting Change and ($0.85) Discontinued Operations
** 2006, as reported: Excludes ($0.03) Merger Costs, ($0.70) Loss on Sale of RGE, and ($0.05) Discontinued Operations

… with reduced international risk.

$2.20

$2.24

$2.28

$2.34

$2.00

$2.10

$2.20

$2.30

$2.40

$2.50

$2.60

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Improved earnings causes our dividend payout ratio to
decline below 50% ...

… providing us the flexibility to raise our dividend above
recent levels.

Payout
Ratio

*Indicated annual dividend rate

Creating shareholder value for the long-term …

100

200

300

400

500

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

PEG

S&P Electrics

… has been and will continue to be our focus.

Total Comparative Returns
(8/31/97 – 8/31/07)

Public Service Enterprise Group

APPENDIX

PSEG Power – Solidly positioned …

Nuclear and fossil fleet operating at historically high
levels with opportunity for incremental improvement

Near-term growth fueled by strong markets and roll-off
of below market contracts

Long-term growth influenced by:

Tightening reserve margins

Expansion capability at existing sites

Carbon advantaged portfolio

Debate on energy policy will influence investment

Environmental compliance driving current investment

New nuclear capacity represents a partial solution to carbon
reduction goals

… to provide strong growth for PSEG.

Low-cost portfolio

Strong cash generator

Regional focus with demonstrated
BGS success

Assets favorably located

Many units east of PJM constraint

Southern NEPOOL/ Connecticut
constraint

Near customers/load centers

Integrated generation and portfolio
management optimizes asset-
based revenues

… which provides for risk mitigation and strong returns.

Power’s assets reflect a diverse blend of fuels and
technologies …

18%

47 %

8 %

26 %

Fuel Diversity – 2007

Coal

Gas

Oil

Nuclear

Pumped

Storage

Energy Produced - 2006

55%

27%

16%

Oil 1%

Pumped
Storage
1%

Nuclear

Coal

Gas

Total GWh: 53,617

Total MW: 13,600

... which experience higher prices during periods of high demand.

Power’s assets are located in attractive markets near load
centers …

Current plant locations,

site expansion capability

Bethlehem Energy Center

(Albany)

New Haven

Bergen

Kearny

Essex

Sewaren

Edison

Linden

Mercer

Burlington

National Park

Hudson

Conemaugh

Keystone

Bridgeport

Peach Bottom

Hope Creek

Salem

System Interface

$490

$700 - $750

2007 – 2010
Total

($ million)

2010

Mercer

2010

Hudson Unit
2

Completion
Date

Environmental Capital Requirements

Emissions Control Technology Projects

- NOx control – SCR

- SO₂control – Scrubber

- Hg and particulate matter control -
Baghouse

Hudson Unit 2 (608 MW)

NOx control – SCR installation complete

SO₂ control – Scrubbers

Hg and particulate matter control –
Baghouse

Mercer (648 MW) – Units 1&2

Our environmental response…

… will help preserve the availability of our fossil fleet.

Power’s New Jersey coal units are
mid-merit, with capacity factors
averaging 50% to 60%

As markets tighten, increased
production is anticipated

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Est

2008

Fwd

2009

Fwd

$12

$/mmbtu

$/MWh

… influenced by market dynamics.

(1)

Central Appalachian coal

(2)

Forward prices as of August 20, 2007

Long-term market prices …

Electricity

(left scale)

Coal(1)

(right
scale)

Natural Gas Henry Hub

(right scale)

(2)

2007- 2009 Capacity Auction Results

N/A

$111.92

$29.53

$180.58

$210.11

$5.29

$143.51

$148.80

2008/
2009

2007/
2008

($/MW-day)

N/A

$40.80

Rest of Pool

$48.38

$140.16

$188.54

Southwest MAAC

$20.16

$177.51

$197.67

Eastern MAAC

CTR Value*

Load Price

Unit Price

Auctions scheduled in the next six months provide transition through the 2010-2011
delivery year.

Future auction pricing to be influenced by increase in number of zones (2010 – 2011
delivery year), load growth, avoided cost for units, and capacity available (unit capability,
retirements, new build).

* CTR Value: Capacity Transfer Rights
Allocated to Load Serving Entities (LSE) in constrained zones to provide them with access to supply from outside the zone

PJM released results on July 13 from its second capacity auction under the Reliability
Pricing Model (RPM) for the 2008-2009 delivery year.

May 2008

2011 – 2012

January 2008

2010 – 2011

Annual base auction in May of each subsequent year

October 2007

2009 – 2010

Auction Date

Planning Year

(6/1 to 5/31)

RPM Capacity Auction – Transparent Pricing Model

Capacity Position

* Delivery year runs from June 1 – May 31

Only a portion of PSEG Power’s capacity was open to realize prices in
the recent PJM-RPM auctions. Increasing amounts are open to realize
prices in future years.

A significant percent of Power’s capacity was contracted as part of

New Jersey’s 3-year BGS* auction (Power currently serving 11
tranches from the 2005 auction, 20 tranches from 2006 and 19
tranches from 2007), as well as other contracting activity.

The balance of Power’s PJM capacity has obtained price certainty

through May 31, 2009 from the first two RPM auctions.

All of Power’s New England capacity has obtained price certainty

through May 31, 2010 as a result of the fixed price nature of the
transitional FCM auction.

Existing capacity hedges support our forecast year-over-year
improvement in capacity margin for 2007 of $125 - $175 million with
similar improvement in 2008.

… while preserving market growth opportunities.

Power’s hedging strategy aims to balance stable
earnings …

~10%

~50%

~100%

Percent of Power’s coal and nuclear energy output
hedged (total portfolio)*

2010

2009

2008

2007

*As of August 2007

PJM RTC GWh

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

2007

2008

2009

2010

Nuclear / Pumped Storage

Coal

Steam / CT

Existing Load + Hedges + Future BGS

Existing Load + Hedges

Existing Hedges

2007

2008

2009

2010

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

Nuclear and Coal output

Contracted sales

… is aligned with its low-cost generating output and our
hedging strategies.

Power has contracted for 100% of its nuclear uranium fuel through 2011 and
approximately 90% of its coal needs through 2009.

Coal and Nuclear Fuel

Power’s hedging of coal and nuclear fuel …

Coal and Nuclear Output

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

Coal

Uranium

Contracted sales

Capacity

Load shape

Transmission

Congestion

Ancillary services

Risk premium

Full Requirements

Round the Clock
PJM West
Forward Energy
Price

$33 - $34

$36 - $37

$55

$66

$44 - $46

~ $21

~ $18

~ $21

$102

$67 - $70

~ $32

Increase in Full Requirements Component Due to:

Increased Congestion (East/West Basis)

Increase in Capacity Markets/RPM

Volatility in Market Increases Risk Premium

$99

~ $41

$58-$60

Market Perspective – BGS Auction Results

… has enabled successful participation in each BGS auction.

Power’s fleet diversity and location ...

2003 Auction

2004 Auction

2005 Auction

2006 Auction

2007 Auction

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

2005

2006

2007 Est

2008 Est

2009 Est

… are expected to drive significant increases in Power’s
gross margin.

Operational improvements and recontracting in
current markets …

Realized Gross Margin ($/MWh)

Energy

Capacity

*Presented at March 26, 2007 Financial Conference

PSE&G – A consistent, strong performer …

Regulatory agreements provide opportunity to earn
reasonable returns over 2007-2009

Investment in transmission fuels long-term growth

Energy Master Plan (EMP) initiatives provide a secondary
source of growth

Continued top quartile/top decile performance

National ReliabilityOne Award winner – two years running

American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Customer
Satisfaction Survey

… providing financial stability and multiple platforms for growth.

Regulated electric transmission, electric and gas distribution system

Characteristics

FERC regulation for electric transmission; NJ BPU regulation for electric
and gas distribution

Electric and Gas distribution rates frozen through November 2009

PSE&G’s base investment plan …

Gas

Distribution

31%

Electric

Transmission

22%

Electric

Distribution

47%

Gas

Distribution

34%

Electric

Transmission

12%

Electric

Distribution

54%

2006 Actual

Rate Base = $6.5 B

2011 Base Plan

Rate Base = $8.7 B

Equity Ratio ~ 48%

… coupled with fair regulatory treatment provides a solid base
for future earnings growth.

PSE&G Rate Base

PSEG Energy Holdings - Reducing risk …

Diverse asset base with improved stability and growing markets

Latin American distribution assets in stable economies

Gas-fired combined cycle generation in Texas

A source of capital

Asset sales have reduced risk and contributed to an improved
balance sheet at PSEG

Agreement reached to sell Electroandes

Exploring potential sale of Chilquinta and Luz del Sur

A source of growth

Texas generating assets benefit from location, low cost structure
and opportunity for expansion

Returned $150M from SAESA financing

… with redeployment of capital.

Improved risk profile by reducing capital invested in
non-strategic assets …

… while increasing returns and sharpening focus on G&A.

2004

2006

$2.6B

$2.0B

Chile &
Peru

Other

$900M

$400M

$1.3B

$150M

$500M

$1.4B

35%

15%

50%

68%

25%

$317M**

63%

39%

2004

2006

2007

Projected

$195M**

$180M-$200M**

Composition of Global’s Pre-tax
Contribution by Region*

G&A

$(40)

$(35)

$(22)

Chile &
Peru

Other

$50

26%

$104

53%

$41

21%

$13

$129

41%

$175

55%

Global’s Invested Capital

$500M

$1.3 B

12/31/07
Projected

$1.6B

63%

30%

*Includes both consolidated and unconsolidated investments after project debt, before allocation of parent debt

**Excludes interest, taxes, G&A and other corporate items to arrive at Global’s Operating Earnings, includes Electroandes

06/30/07

$1.9B

$1B

$500M

67%

26%

$150M

$100M

-2%

Strong operations and markets …

$ 382

(32)

208

$ 111

2006

$ 627

(33)

406

$ 193

2007

Operating Earnings

Per Share

$ Millions (except EPS)

(0.12)

(0.13)

Enterprise

$ 1.52

$ 2.47

PSEG

0.38

0.24

PSEG Energy Holdings

0.82

1.60

PSEG Power

$ 0.44

$ 0.76

PSE&G

2006

2007

$ 382

(32)

208

$ 111

2006

$ 627

(33)

406

$ 193

2007

Operating Earnings

Per Share

$ Millions (except EPS)

(0.12)

(0.13)

Enterprise

$ 1.52

$ 2.47

PSEG

0.38

0.24

PSEG Energy Holdings

0.82

1.60

PSEG Power

$ 0.44

$ 0.76

PSE&G

2006

2007

Six months ended June 30,

* See page 51 for Items excluded from Net Income to reconcile to Operating Earnings

… supported first-half EPS growth of 63%.

The capital program has been expanded …

($ Millions)

Capital Spending Update

$1,295

$375

$273

$197

$368

$82

TOTAL

(1)

Parent

PSEG Energy Holdings

217

(22)

(86)

190

PSEG Power*

$1,075

$396

$359

$134

$175

$11

PSE&G

Change from 2006 10-K

$7,047

$1,201

$1,414

$1,408

$1,681

$1,343

TOTAL

176

$971

2011

135

Parent

170

PSEG Energy Holdings

2,668

441

580

816

655

PSEG Power*

$4,074

$919

$765

$803

$616

PSE&G

TOTAL

2010

2009

2008

2007

… to support reliability, environmental commitments and growth.

* Figures for PSEG Power exclude Nuclear Fuel

Company

Facility

Expiration

Date

Total

Facility

Available

Liquidity

6/30/07

PSEG

5-year Credit Facility

Dec-11

1,000

949

PSE&G

5-year Credit Facility

Jun-11

600

330

Energy Holdings

5-year Credit Facility

Jun-10

150

135

Power

5-year Credit Facility

Dec-11

1,600

1,402

Bilateral Credit Facility

Mar-10

100

Bilateral Credit Facility

Mar-08

200

Total

3,650

3,062

Liquidity is available with favorable terms and
conditions …

… thereby supporting our credit profile.

($ Millions)

Our forecasted cash flows remain intact…

We remain comfortable with a forecast

improvement in cash

- Operating income in line with expectations

- Electroandes sale to close in October

- Planned rate mechanisms for transmission
investments would provide cash recovery during
construction

Excess cash between $1.5 billion and $2.0 billion

should be available through 2011

… with excess cash expected to be used to retire debt through
first half of 2008, thereafter for incremental growth and/or
share repurchase.

Right set of assets…

Large, diverse mix of low-cost, base-load, load-following generating assets

Reliable electric and gas distribution and transmission systems

Stable portfolio of investments in domestic generation, international distribution and leases

Right markets…

Generation assets operate in tightly constrained and growing markets

Nuclear and coal base-load capacity operate in markets where the price for power is set by
gas

Transmission and distribution assets provide service in a modest growth market with
reasonable regulation

At the right time…

Mid-Atlantic, New England and Texas recognizing the value of capacity in constrained areas

A move to control carbon benefits our nuclear-based fleet

Power has opportunity for brownfield development at existing sites

Values are improving for international assets

T&D set to benefit from capital investment for new infrastructure

PSEG – Excellent position for today …

… ready for tomorrow

Meeting commitments

Earnings on track to meet guidance

System reliability enhanced with expansion of transmission system

Turning challenges into opportunities

Addressing NJ’s Clean Energy goals

Solar initiative

PSE&G to use more energy efficient equipment and vehicles

NJ support for emissions portfolio standard

Building foundation for growth

Monetizing non-core assets

Meeting targets for debt reduction

Capital program expanded

Public Service Enterprise Group dedicated to …

… operational excellence, financial strength and disciplined
investment.

Why invest in PSEG?

Growing and visible stream of earnings

Hedging and RPM

Regulated utility operations

Strong balance sheet

Cash available for growth

Competitive dividend yield

Opportunities to invest in markets we know

… And, we still sell at a discount!

16.8

16.4

2007E

P/E

Earnings Per
Share*

3.1%

14.9

$3.40

$3.03

Merrill Lynch
Index**

2.8%

14.3

$5.85

$5.10

PSEG

Yield %

2008E

2007E

*Mid-point of guidance range
Priced as of August 27, 2007
**Merrill Lynch Index of Less-Regulated Utilities

New Officers

Izzo – PSEG -
Chairman,
President & CEO

Levis – PSEG Power -
President, CNO, COO

LaRossa – PSE&G
– President & COO

O’Flynn – PSEG - EVP/
CFO, PSEG Holdings -
President

Simpson – PSEG Svcs
- President & COO

Selover – PSEG
Svcs - EVP & Gen
Counsel

Paszynsky

Pego

Hallerdin

Quinn

McLaughlin

Svenson

Frank – VP
Supply Chain

Chouthai

Falck – SVP
Law

McAuliffe

Leyden

Bonnifield

Black

Linde

Smith

Hoskins – VP –
Fed Affairs &Policy

Thigpen – VP –
State Gov Affairs

Byrd – SVP Finance,
Business Development
& Strategy / M&A

Kahrer

Jennings

Seabrook

VP – M&A

Cregg

Moran

MacDonald

Plawner

Lally – VP –
Investor Relations

McGrath

DiRisio

Krueger

Metzger

Brooks

Joyce – SVP
Operations –
Salem/Hope Creek

Barnes – Site VP –
Hope Creek

Fricker – VP –
Operations Support

Braun – Site VP -
Salem

Quinn

Wohlfarth

DePillo

Lopriore – President
– PSEG Fossil

VP Fossil
Ops

Ameo

Pastor

Latka

Dickens

Cardenas

Forline

Lark

Sundheim

Garcez

Matos

New Officers

KEY:

Items excluded from Net Income to reconcile to Operating Earnings

Please see Slide 2 for an explanation of PSEG’s use of Operating Earnings as a non-GAAP financial measure and how

it differs from Net Income.

$ Millions (except EPS)

2007

2006

2007

2006

2007

2006

2007

2006

Merger related Costs:

PSE&G

(1)

Power

(1)

(2)

Enterprise

(1)

(5)

Total Merger Related Costs

(3)

(8)

(0.01)

(0.03)

Loss on sale of RGE (Holdings)

(177)

(0.70)

Discontinued Operations:

Power - Lawrenceburg

(3)

(8)

(9)

(17)

(0.02)

(0.03)

(0.04)

(0.07)

Holdings:

Elcho and Skawina

223

227

Electroandes

(15)

(14)

Total Holdings

(15)

225

(14)

232

(0.05)

0.89

(0.05)

0.92

Total Discontinued Operations

(18)

217

(23)

215

(0.07)

0.86

(0.09)

0.85

Quarter Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

Impact to PSEG EPS

Quarter Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,