8-K

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) May 30, 2007
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Jersey	001-09120	22-2625848
(State or other	(Commission File Number)	(I.R.S. Employer
jurisdiction of incorporation)		Identification No.)
80 Park Plaza, P.O. Box 1171
Newark, New Jersey 07101-1171
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
973-430-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
http://www.pseg.com
PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Jersey	001-00973	22-1212800
(State or other	(Commission File Number)	(I.R.S. Employer
jurisdiction of incorporation)		Identification No.)
80 Park Plaza, P.O. Box 570
Newark, New Jersey 07101-0570
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
973-430-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
http://www.pseg.com
PSEG POWER LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware	000-49614	22-3663480
(State or other	(Commission File Number)	(I.R.S. Employer
jurisdiction of incorporation)		Identification No.)
80 Park Plaza, T-25
Newark, New Jersey 07102-4194
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
973-430-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
http://www.pseg.com
PSEG ENERGY HOLDINGS L.L.C.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Jersey	000-32503	42-1544079
(State or other	(Commission File Number)	(I.R.S. Employer
jurisdiction of incorporation)		Identification No.)
80 Park Plaza, T-20
Newark, New Jersey 07102-4194
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
973-430-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
http://www.pseg.com

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

[ ]	Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
[ ]	Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
[ ]	Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
[ ]	Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

          The information contained in Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure in this combined Form 8-K is separately furnished, as noted, by Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated (PSEG), Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G), PSEG Power LLC (Power) and PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C. (Energy Holdings). Information contained herein relating to any individual company is provided by such company on its own behalf and in connection with its respective Form 8-K. PSE&G, Power and Energy Holdings each makes representations only as to itself and makes no other representations whatsoever as to any other company.

Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure

          On May 30, 2007, PSEG participated in the Deutsche Bank Conference in Miami, Florida. A copy of the discussion materials used at the meeting is furnished as Exhibit 99 to this Form 8-K.

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits

Exhibit 99 Discussion Materials for the Deutsche Bank Conference.

2

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED
(Registrant)
By:	/s/ Derek M. DiRisio
Derek M. DiRisio
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: May 30, 2007

3

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.

PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
(Registrant)
By:	/s/ Derek M. DiRisio
Derek M. DiRisio
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: May 30, 2007

4

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.

PSEG POWER LLC
(Registrant)
By:	/s/ Derek M. DiRisio
Derek M. DiRisio
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: May 30, 2007

5

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. The signature of the undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.

PSEG ENERGY HOLDINGS L.L.C.
(Registrant)
By:	/s/ Derek M. DiRisio
Derek M. DiRisio
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: May 30, 2007

6

EX-99

Exhibit 99

Public Service Enterprise Group

Deutsche Bank Conference

Miami, Florida

May 30, 2007

Forward-Looking Statement

The statements contained in this communication about our and our subsidiaries’
future performance, including, without limitation, future revenues, earnings,
strategies, prospects and all other statements that are not purely historical, are
forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor provisions under The
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Although we believe that our
expectations are based on information currently available and on reasonable
assumptions, we can give no assurance they will be achieved.  There are a
number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements made herein. A discussion of
some of these risks and uncertainties is contained in our Annual Report on Form
10-K and subsequent reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and available on our website:
http://www.pseg.com.    These documents address in further detail our business,
industry issues and other factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those indicated in this communication. In addition, any forward-
looking statements included herein represent our estimates only as of today and
should not be relied upon as representing our estimates as of any subsequent
date.  While we may elect to update forward-looking statements from time to time,
we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our estimates change,
unless otherwise required by applicable securities laws.

2

PSEG Overview

Electric Customers:   2.1M

Gas Customers:     1.7M

Nuclear Capacity:     3,500 MW

Total Capacity:        13,600 MW

Traditional T&D

Leveraged
Leases

2007E Operating Earnings₍₄₎ ^:   $1,245M - $1,370M 

2007 EPS Guidance₍₄₎ ^:                      $4.90 - $5.30

Assets (as of 12/31/06):                           $28.6B

Market Capitalization (as of 5/24/07):     $22.4B

Domestic/Int’l
Energy

Regional
Wholesale Energy

Operating Earnings = Earnings Available and Excludes:

                (1)  Merger Costs of $1M

                (2)  Loss from Discontinued Operations of $239M

                (3)  Loss on Sale of RGE of $178M and Income from Discontinued Operations of $226M

                       Includes Operating Earnings from Global of $166M, Resources of $63M and Energy Holdings of ($2M)

                (4)  Includes the parent impact of $(50)M –$(40)M

2006 Operating Earnings:   $262M₍₁₎         $515M₍₂₎                                  $227M₍₃₎

2007 Guidance:  $340M - $360M                $825M - $905M                                     $130M - $145M

3

Record production

Liquid markets structure and  
stable NJ BGS model

Favorable energy and capacity
outlook

Strong
Operations

Constructive
Regulatory and
Business
Environment

Positive Market
Fundamentals

Growth
Opportunities…
with Manageable
Risk

Tightening reserve margin and site
expansion opportunities

Positioned for growth in 2007 and beyond …

4

Low-cost portfolio

Strong cash generator

Regional focus with
demonstrated BGS success

Assets favorably located

Many units east of PJM
constraint

Southern NEPOOL/ Connecticut
constraint

Near customers/load centers

Integrated generation and
portfolio management optimizes
asset-based revenues

… which provides for risk mitigation and strong returns.

Power’s assets reflect a diverse blend of fuels and
technologies …

18%

47 %

8 %

26 %

Fuel Diversity – 2007

Coal

Gas

Oil

Nuclear

Pumped

Storage

1%

Energy Produced - 2006

55%

27%

16%

Oil 1%

Pumped
Storage
1%

Nuclear

Coal

Gas

Total GWh: 53,617

Total MW: 13,600

5

... which experience higher prices during periods of high demand.

Power’s assets are located in attractive markets near load
centers …

Current plant locations,

site expansion capability

Bethlehem Energy Center

(Albany)

New Haven

Bergen

Kearny

Essex

Sewaren

Edison

Linden

Mercer

Burlington

National Park

Hudson

Conemaugh

Keystone

Bridgeport

Peach Bottom

Hope Creek

Salem

System Interface

6

Baseload units:

- Very low variable cost, low
    bid price into the energy
    market

- Always, or almost always
    called upon to provide
    power to serve load

Load following units:

- Primarily gas-fired,
    higher variable cost

- Intermittently called
    upon to provide power
    to serve load

Peaking units:

- Gas- and oil-fired, high variable cost,
    leading to high bid price into the
    energy market

- Called upon to provide power only
    during periods of peak demand to
    serve load

Salem

Hope

Creek

Keystone

Conemaugh

Hudson 2

Linden 1,2

Burlington

Edison

Essex

Bergen 1

Sewaren

Hudson 1

Megawatts (MW)

Mercer1, 2

Bergen 2

… position the company well to serve full requirement load contracts.

Sewaren

Kearny

Linden / Essex

Burlington 12  / Kearny 12

Peach

Bottom

Bridgeport

New

Haven

Nuclear

Coal

Combined Cycle

Steam

GT Peaking

Power’s assets along the dispatch curve …

BEC

Illustrative

7

Operated by PSEG Nuclear

PSEG Ownership: 100%

Technology:Boiling Water Reactor

Total Capacity: 1,061MW*

Owned Capacity:  1,061MW

License Expiration: 2026

Operated by PSEG Nuclear

Ownership: PSEG - 57%,
Exelon – 43%

Technology:

Pressurized Water Reactor

Total Capacity: 2,304MW

Owned Capacity: 1,323MW

License Expiration: 2016 and
2020

Operated by Exelon

Ownership:  PSEG 50%,

       Exelon – 50%

Technology:

       Boiling Water Reactor

Total Capacity: 2,224MW

Owned Capacity: 1,112MW

License Expiration: 2033
and 2034

Hope Creek

Salem Units 1 and 2

Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3

Our five-unit nuclear fleet …

… is a critical element of Power’s success.

*Uprate of 125MW scheduled for fall 2007

8

82.3%

65.6%

92.0%

82.8%

92.6%

97.2%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Salem

Hope Creek

Capacity Factor

6.5%

20.2%

0.9%

7.6%

0.7%

0.4%

0%

6%

12%

18%

24%

Salem

Hope Creek

Forced Loss Rate

81.0

64.8

95.2

65.0

99.2

91.4

60

70

80

90

100

Salem

Hope Creek

INPO Index

80.2%

97.4%

84.7%

99.9%

99.8%

100.0%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Salem

Hope Creek

Summer Capacity Factor

… and corresponds directly with improved regulatory relations and
financial outcomes.

Improvement in nuclear performance can be seen in
numerous measures of operations ...

2004

2005

2006

9

Complete Management Model
implementation

Maintain operational focus

Resume independent operation

Succession plan

Bill Levis appointed as President &
COO, PSEG Power; retains CNO
positon

Richard Lopriore appointed as
President, PSEG Fossil

Tom Joyce appointed as Senior VP –
Operations for Salem – Hope Creek

… which will strengthen Power’s results going forward.

Continuing efforts are focused on sustaining the
improving trend …

Maintain stakeholder
confidence

Preserve nuclear options
for Power

Ongoing Initiatives

Expected Results

10

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Coal

Combined Cycle

Peaking & Other

Total Fossil Output(GWh)

A Diverse 10,000 MW Fleet

2,400 MW coal

3,200 MW combined cycle

4,400 MW peaking and other

Strong Performance

Continued growth in output

Improved fleet performance

Achieved resolution regarding
Hudson / Mercer

… contribute to a low-cost fossil portfolio in which two-thirds of
fleet output is from coal facilities.

Strong Fossil operations …

11

$490

$600 - $750

2007 – 2010 Total

($ million)

2010

Mercer**

2010

Hudson
Unit 2

Completion
Date

Environmental Capital Requirements

Emissions Control Technology Projects

- NO_x control – SCR

- SO₂ control – Scrubber

- Hg and particulate matter control -
  Baghouse

Hudson Unit 2* (608 MW)

NO_x control – SCR installation complete

SO₂ control – Scrubbers

Hg and particulate matter control –     
Baghouse

Mercer (648 MW) – Units 1&2

Our environmental strategy…

… will help preserve the availability of our fossil fleet.

*PSEG Fossil to notify USEPA and NJDEP by end of 2007 on decision to install emissions controls at Hudson Unit 2                        
**Capital investment $40M above 2006 10-K disclosure -- EPC Contract signed

Power’s New Jersey coal units are   
mid-merit, with capacity factors
averaging 50% to 60%

As markets tighten, increased
production is anticipated

12

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Est

2008

Fwd

2009

Fwd

$0

$3

$6

$9

$12

$/mmbtu

$/MWh

… benefiting Power’s coal and nuclear fleet.

(1)

Central Appalachian coal

(2)

Forward prices as of May 18, 2007

Increases in fossil fuels have driven up energy prices …

Electricity

(left scale)

Coal(1)

(right
scale)

Natural Gas Henry Hub

(right scale)

(2)

(2)

(2)

13

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007 Est

2008

Fwd

2009

Fwd

PS Zone Basis

Historical spot basis

Forward basis

Large portion of sales are into forward market where forward basis has remained high.

Zonal prices in the eastern portions of PJM have
historically been higher than the Western Hub…

… allowing Power to realize higher prices due to its favorable
location.

(1) Forward prices as of May 18, 2007

(1)

(1)

(1)

14

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Source: Data per PJM’s State of the Market report March 2007

*Annualized payment required to make an investment

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

… which may serve to tighten reserve margins.

Despite the recent run up, prices have not
consistently supported new capacity construction …

Economic Dispatch Net Revenue

20-year Levelized Fixed Cost*

Combustion Turbine ($/KW-yr)

Combined Cycle ($/KW-yr)

Pulverized Coal ($/KW-yr)

15

Regional Generation Balance 2007 - 2011

(Percent above or below target Reserve Margin)

7%

5%

5%

4%

3%

5%

2%

-1%

-2%

-3%

-1%

-1%

-4%

-7%

0%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

PJM (RM Target = 115%)

NY ISO (116.5%)

NE ISO (114.5% implied)

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Data Source: PJM, NY ISO and NE ISO

Reserve margins in the key Power markets are expected
to continue to decline …

… which should sustain higher energy prices as heat rates expand.

16

More structured, forward-
looking, transparent pricing
model

Gives prospective
investors in new
generating facilities more
clarity on future value of
capacity

Sends locational pricing
signal to encourage
expansion of capacity
where needed for future
market demands

… in which longer-term price signals are provided.

PJM’s Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) reflects a change
in market design …

$0

$20

$40

$60

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

$80

2008

2009

Settled @ $72/kw-yr

’08 – ’09 Market
Trading

@ $40 -$45/kw-yr

’07 – ’08 Auction

Capacity Prices

$45/KW-yr = $123/MW-day

@ 50% load factor » $10/MWh

17

RPM Capacity Auction – April Results and Schedule

2007- 2008 Capacity Auction Results

($/ MW-day)

N/A

N/A

$40.80

Rest of
Pool

$48.38

$140.16

$188.54

Southwest
MAAC

$20.16

$177.51

$197.67

Eastern
MAAC

CTR
Value*

Load
Price

Unit
Price

PJM released results on April 13 from its

first capacity auction under the Reliability
Pricing Model (RPM) for the 2007-2008
delivery year.

Pricing in initial auction for Eastern MAAC

reflected “Cost of New Entry”: standard
simple cycle gas turbine adjusted for
location.

Future auction pricing could be influenced

by changes in demand and capacity
availability including transmission capability
between zones.

Market prices support our forecast year-

over-year improvement in capacity margin
of $125M - $175M in 2007 with further
improvement in 2008.

Auctions are scheduled throughout the

year to provide transition through the 2010-
2011 delivery year.

*CTR Value: Capacity Transfer Rights                                                                                    
Allocated to Load Serving Entities (LSE) in constrained zones to provide them with
access to supply from outside the zone.

May 2008

2011 –  2012

January 2008

2010 – 2011

Annual base auction in May of each subsequent year

October 2007

2009 – 2010

July 2007

2008 – 2009

Auction Date

Planning Year

(6/1 to 5/31)

Auction Schedule

18

Policymakers are looking to cap and trade for the power
industry to reduce CO₂ emissions.

PSEG’s generation carbon intensity is lower than many competitors and benefits from a
cap and trade program comparably applied to all competitors.

2004 CO₂ Emission Rate Ranking

(25 Largest Generating Companies in PJM)

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

(lbs/MWh

all sources)

$8-$12/MWh gas

$20/MWh coal

$20/ton

$4-$6/MWh gas

$10/MWh coal

$10/ton

$0.40-$0.60/MWh gas

$1/MWh coal

$1/ton

Generator Impact

CO₂ Cost

Potential Impact of CO₂ on
Power Plant Costs

Note: Ranking data compiled by NRDC, CERES and PSEG Power

19

… as market fundamentals and regulatory policy impact market
conditions.

Looking ahead, Power is well positioned to benefit from
generation value improvement …

Tightening reserve margins should:

Put upward pressure on capacity prices, and

Drive heat rate expansion if baseload additions are insufficient

The implementation of carbon rules is becoming more likely

Anticipated to put upward pressure on prices

Nuclear generation stands to benefit from carbon constraints

20

-

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

2007

2008

2009

2010

Nuclear / Pumped Storage

Coal

CC

Steam / CT

Existing Load + Hedges + Future BGS

Existing Load + Hedges

Existing Hedges

2007

2008

2009

2010

… while preserving market growth opportunities.

Power’s hedging strategy aims to balance stable
earnings …

0 – 20%

35 – 50%

90 – 100%

~100%

Percent of Power’s coal and nuclear energy output
hedged (total portfolio)*

2010

2009

2008

2007

PJM  RTC (GWh)

*As of 1Q07

21

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

Coal

Uranium

Contracted sales

… is aligned with its low-cost generating output and our hedging
strategies.

Power has contracted for 100% of its nuclear uranium fuel through 2011 and
approximately 70% of its coal needs through 2009.

Coal and Nuclear Fuel

Power’s hedging of coal and nuclear fuel …

Gas supply secured
based on sales of output

Coal and Nuclear Output

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

2007

2008

2009

2010

Year

Nuclear and Coal output

Contracted sales

22

2003 Auction

2004 Auction

2005 Auction

2006 Auction

2007 Auction

Capacity

Load shape

Transmission

Congestion

Ancillary services

Risk premium

Full Requirements

Round the Clock
PJM West
Forward Energy
Price

$33 - $34

$36 - $37

$55

$55

$66

$44 - $46

~ $21

~ $18

~ $21

$102

$67 - $70

~ $32

Increase in Full Requirements Component Due to:  

Increased Congestion (East/West Basis)

Increase in Capacity Markets/RPM

Volatility in Market Increases Risk Premium

$99

~ $41

$58-$60

Market Perspective – BGS Auction Results

… has enabled successful participation in each BGS auction.

Power’s fleet diversity and location ...

23

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

2005

2006

2007 Est

2008 Est

2009 Est

… are expected to drive significant increases in Power’s gross
margin.

Operational improvements and recontracting in
current markets …

Realized Gross Margin ($/MWh)

Energy

Capacity

(Energy prices based on recent forward markets;

Illustrative capacity prices based on recent market for 2007/2008 in all years)

24

Gas Asset Optimization

Large wholesale provider to PSE&G and others

Storage capacity of 80 Bcf (in the Gulf and market regions)

Firm transportation of 1.1 Bcf/Day (on ten pipelines)

Off-system sales margins shared with residential customers

Commercial & Industrial customers (C&I) sales priced monthly at market

Storage spreads capture Summer/Winter price differential on C&I sales

Weather and price volatility drive results

Colder than normal weather increases unitized fixed cost recovery

Ancillary Services

Emissions

… to round out a robust portfolio.

In addition to energy and capacity, Power has other
attractive sources of revenues …

25

… drive the increase in PSEG’s 2007 earnings guidance.

*Excludes Merger costs of $12M in 2005, Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle of $16M in 2005 and
Loss from Discontinued Operations of $226M and $239M in 2005 and 2006, respectively

2005 Operating

Earnings

2006 Operating

Earnings

Energy

Capacity

Other

2007 Guidance

$515M*

$446M*

$825M to
$905M

$15M - $25M

$220M - $260M

$75M - $105M

Improvements across the portfolio …

26

2007 Guidance

Energy

Capacity

Other

2008

Expectations

2009

Expectations

… drive PSEG’s earnings expectations for 2008 and beyond.

Drivers of 2009 Earnings

Recontracting

Operational excellence

Free cash flow

Growth opportunities

Further improvements at Power…

$825M to
$905M

27

Highest output ever from Nuclear

Highest output ever from Fossil

Balanced hedging strategy at ER&T

Strong, liquid markets

Sustainable BGS auction structure

Consent decree resolution

Rising energy prices

Favorable capacity market design

Diverse assets in constrained zones

Strong
Operations

Constructive
Regulatory and
Business
Environment

Positive Market
Fundamentals

Growth
Opportunities…
with Manageable
Risk

Near term – Hope Creek Uprate, RPM auctions

Longer term –

Tightening reserve margins

CO₂ benefit to low carbon portfolio

Site expansion opportunities

Surrounding market opportunities

New nuclear investment potential

Manageable risk –

Enhanced operations

Balanced hedging strategy

Existing sites

Increasingly stable earnings base through
capacity market design

Positioned for growth in 2007 and beyond

28

Favorably Located Diverse Portfolio

Operational Improvements

Energy Market Improvements

Capacity Market Design Changes

Generation Value Improvement

Growth Opportunities

V

A

L

U

E

… fuel Power as the growth engine for PSEG.

Fundamental strengths and growth drivers …

29

196

227

347

262

446

515

130-145

130-145

340-360

330-350

825-905

770-850

(71)

(66)

(50)-(40)

(60)-(50)

2005

2006

2007 (Initial)

2007 (Revised)

2008

Strong earnings growth in 2007 for PSEG …

… a 37% increase over 2006 and expectations of 15% growth in 2008.

Holdings

Parent***

$5.60 - $6.10

$3.77*

$3.71**

$4.60 - $5.00

$4.90 - $5.30

PSE&G

Power

Operating Earnings by Subsidiary

37%

15%

68%

» 0

*Excludes ($.14) Merger Costs, ($.07) Cumulative Effect of an Accounting Change and ($.85) Discontinued Operations                                    
**Excludes ($.03) Merger Costs, ($.70) Loss on Sale of RGE and ($.05) Discontinued Operations

***Primarily including financing activities at the parent and intercompany elimination

30