XML 72 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
Financing Receivables
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]  
Financing Receivables Financing Receivables
PSE&G
PSE&G sponsors a solar loan program designed to help finance the installation of solar power systems throughout its electric service area. Interest income on the loans is recorded on an accrual basis. The loans are generally paid back with solar renewable energy certificates generated from the installed solar electric system. In the event of a loan default, the basis of the solar loan would be recovered through a regulatory recovery mechanism. None of the solar loans are impaired; however, in the event a loan becomes impaired, the basis of the loan would be recovered through a regulatory recovery mechanism. A substantial portion of these amounts are noncurrent and reported in Long-Term Investments on PSEG’s and PSE&G’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table reflects the outstanding loans by class of customer, none of which would be considered “non-performing.”
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding Loans by Class of Customer
 
 
 
 
As of December 31,
 
 
Consumer Loans
 
2019
 
2018
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
Commercial/Industrial
 
$
156

 
$
164

 
 
Residential
 
8

 
9

 
 
Total
 
$
164

 
$
173

 
 
Current Portion (included in Accounts Receivable)
 
(28
)
 
(24
)
 
 
Noncurrent Portion (included in Long-Term Investments)
 
$
136

 
$
149

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Energy Holdings
Energy Holdings had a net investment in domestic energy and real estate assets subject to leveraged lease accounting of $169 million as of December 31, 2019 and $186 million as of December 31, 2018 (See Note 9. Long-Term Investments).
The corresponding receivables associated with the lease portfolio are reflected as follows, net of non-recourse debt. The ratings in the table represent the ratings of the entities providing payment assurance to Energy Holdings.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
Lease Receivables, Net of
Non-Recourse Debt
 
 
Counterparties’ Credit Rating Standard & Poor’s (S&P) as of December 31, 2019
 
As of December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
AA
 
$
12

 
 
A-
 
58

 
 
BBB+ — BBB
 
258

 
 
BB
 
132

 
 
NR
 
38

 
 
Total
 
$
498

 
 
 
 
 
 

The “BB” and the “NR” ratings in the preceding table represent lease receivables related to coal and gas-fired assets in Illinois and Pennsylvania, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the gross investment in the leases of such assets, net of non-recourse debt, was $235 million ($(22) million, net of deferred taxes). A more detailed description of such assets under lease follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset
 
Location
 
Gross
Investment
 
 %
Owned
 
Total MW
 
Fuel
Type
 
Counterparties’
S&P Credit
Ratings
 
Counterparty
 
 
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Powerton Station Units 5 and 6
 
IL
 
$
75

 
64
%
 
1,538

 
Coal
 
BB
 
NRG Energy, Inc.
 
 
Joliet Station Units 7 and 8
 
IL
 
$
85

 
64
%
 
1,036

 
Gas
 
BB
 
NRG Energy, Inc.
 
 
Shawville Station Units 1, 2, 3 and 4
 
PA
 
$
75

 
100
%
 
596

 
Gas
 
NR
 
REMA (A)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(A)
REMA emerged from Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in December 2018. For additional information, see Note 9. Long-Term Investments.
The credit exposure for lessors is partially mitigated through various credit enhancement mechanisms within the lease structures. These credit enhancement features vary from lease to lease. Upon the occurrence of certain defaults, indirect subsidiary companies of Energy Holdings would exercise their rights and seek recovery of their investment, potentially including stepping into the lease directly to protect their investments. While these actions could ultimately protect or mitigate the loss of value, they could require the use of significant capital and trigger certain material tax obligations which could, for certain leases, wholly or partially be mitigated by tax indemnification claims against the counterparty. A bankruptcy of a lessee would likely delay and potentially limit any efforts on the part of the lessors to assert their rights upon default and could delay the monetization of claims.
Additional factors that may impact future lease cash flows include, but are not limited to, new environmental legislation and regulation regarding air quality, water and other discharges in the process of generating electricity, market prices for fuel,
electricity and capacity, overall financial condition of lease counterparties and their affiliates and the quality and condition of assets under lease.
Public Service Electric and Gas Company  
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]  
Financing Receivables Financing Receivables
PSE&G
PSE&G sponsors a solar loan program designed to help finance the installation of solar power systems throughout its electric service area. Interest income on the loans is recorded on an accrual basis. The loans are generally paid back with solar renewable energy certificates generated from the installed solar electric system. In the event of a loan default, the basis of the solar loan would be recovered through a regulatory recovery mechanism. None of the solar loans are impaired; however, in the event a loan becomes impaired, the basis of the loan would be recovered through a regulatory recovery mechanism. A substantial portion of these amounts are noncurrent and reported in Long-Term Investments on PSEG’s and PSE&G’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table reflects the outstanding loans by class of customer, none of which would be considered “non-performing.”
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding Loans by Class of Customer
 
 
 
 
As of December 31,
 
 
Consumer Loans
 
2019
 
2018
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
Commercial/Industrial
 
$
156

 
$
164

 
 
Residential
 
8

 
9

 
 
Total
 
$
164

 
$
173

 
 
Current Portion (included in Accounts Receivable)
 
(28
)
 
(24
)
 
 
Noncurrent Portion (included in Long-Term Investments)
 
$
136

 
$
149

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Energy Holdings
Energy Holdings had a net investment in domestic energy and real estate assets subject to leveraged lease accounting of $169 million as of December 31, 2019 and $186 million as of December 31, 2018 (See Note 9. Long-Term Investments).
The corresponding receivables associated with the lease portfolio are reflected as follows, net of non-recourse debt. The ratings in the table represent the ratings of the entities providing payment assurance to Energy Holdings.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
Lease Receivables, Net of
Non-Recourse Debt
 
 
Counterparties’ Credit Rating Standard & Poor’s (S&P) as of December 31, 2019
 
As of December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
AA
 
$
12

 
 
A-
 
58

 
 
BBB+ — BBB
 
258

 
 
BB
 
132

 
 
NR
 
38

 
 
Total
 
$
498

 
 
 
 
 
 

The “BB” and the “NR” ratings in the preceding table represent lease receivables related to coal and gas-fired assets in Illinois and Pennsylvania, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the gross investment in the leases of such assets, net of non-recourse debt, was $235 million ($(22) million, net of deferred taxes). A more detailed description of such assets under lease follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset
 
Location
 
Gross
Investment
 
 %
Owned
 
Total MW
 
Fuel
Type
 
Counterparties’
S&P Credit
Ratings
 
Counterparty
 
 
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Powerton Station Units 5 and 6
 
IL
 
$
75

 
64
%
 
1,538

 
Coal
 
BB
 
NRG Energy, Inc.
 
 
Joliet Station Units 7 and 8
 
IL
 
$
85

 
64
%
 
1,036

 
Gas
 
BB
 
NRG Energy, Inc.
 
 
Shawville Station Units 1, 2, 3 and 4
 
PA
 
$
75

 
100
%
 
596

 
Gas
 
NR
 
REMA (A)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(A)
REMA emerged from Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in December 2018. For additional information, see Note 9. Long-Term Investments.
The credit exposure for lessors is partially mitigated through various credit enhancement mechanisms within the lease structures. These credit enhancement features vary from lease to lease. Upon the occurrence of certain defaults, indirect subsidiary companies of Energy Holdings would exercise their rights and seek recovery of their investment, potentially including stepping into the lease directly to protect their investments. While these actions could ultimately protect or mitigate the loss of value, they could require the use of significant capital and trigger certain material tax obligations which could, for certain leases, wholly or partially be mitigated by tax indemnification claims against the counterparty. A bankruptcy of a lessee would likely delay and potentially limit any efforts on the part of the lessors to assert their rights upon default and could delay the monetization of claims.
Additional factors that may impact future lease cash flows include, but are not limited to, new environmental legislation and regulation regarding air quality, water and other discharges in the process of generating electricity, market prices for fuel,
electricity and capacity, overall financial condition of lease counterparties and their affiliates and the quality and condition of assets under lease.