XML 54 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
Financing Receivables
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Schedule of Financial Receivables [Line Items]  
Financing Receivables Financing Receivables
PSE&G
PSE&G sponsors a solar loan program designed to help finance the installation of solar power systems throughout its electric service area. Interest income on the loans is recorded on an accrual basis. The loans are generally paid back with solar renewable energy certificates generated from the installed solar electric system. In the event of a loan default, the basis of the solar loan would be recovered through a regulatory recovery mechanism. None of the solar loans are impaired; however, in the event a loan becomes impaired, the basis of the loan would be recovered through a regulatory recovery mechanism. A substantial portion of these amounts are noncurrent and reported in Long-Term Investments on PSEG’s and PSE&G’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table reflects the outstanding loans by class of customer, none of which would be considered “non-performing.”
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding Loans by Class of Customer
 
 
 
 
As of
 
As of
 
 
Consumer Loans
 
September 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
Commercial/Industrial
 
$
153

 
$
164

 
 
Residential
 
8

 
9

 
 
Total
 
$
161

 
$
173

 
 
Current Portion (included in Accounts Receivable)
 
(24
)
 
(24
)
 
 
Noncurrent Portion (included in Long-Term Investments)
 
$
137

 
$
149

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy Holdings
Energy Holdings, through several of its indirect subsidiary companies, has investments in domestic energy and real estate assets subject primarily to leveraged lease accounting. A leveraged lease is typically comprised of an investment by an equity investor and debt provided by a third-party debt investor. The debt is recourse only to the assets subject to lease and is not included on PSEG’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As an equity investor, Energy Holdings’ equity investments in the leases are comprised of the total expected lease receivables over the lease terms plus the estimated residual values at the end of the lease terms, reduced for any income not yet earned on the leases. This amount is included in Long-Term Investments on PSEG’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The more rapid depreciation of the leased property for tax purposes creates tax cash flow that will be repaid to the taxing authority in later periods. As such, the liability for such taxes due is recorded in Deferred Income Taxes on PSEG’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During the second quarter of 2019, Energy Holdings completed its annual review of estimated residual values embedded in the leveraged leases. The outcome indicated that the updated residual value estimate of the coal-fired Powerton lease was lower than the recorded residual value and the decline was deemed to be other than temporary as a result of expected future adverse market conditions. As a result, a pre-tax write-down of $58 million was reflected in Operating Revenues in the quarter ended June 30, 2019, calculated by comparing the gross investment in the leases before and after the revised residual estimates.
The following table shows Energy Holdings’ gross and net lease investment as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of
 
As of
 
 
 
September 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
Lease Receivables (net of Non-Recourse Debt)
$
500

 
$
504

 
 
Estimated Residual Value of Leased Assets
201

 
326

 
 
Total Investment in Rental Receivables
701

 
830

 
 
Unearned and Deferred Income
(208
)
 
(290
)
 
 
Gross Investments in Leases
493

 
540

 
 
Deferred Tax Liabilities
(331
)
 
(354
)
 
 
Net Investments in Leases
$
162

 
$
186

 
 
 
 
 
 
 


The corresponding receivables associated with the lease portfolio are reflected as follows, net of non-recourse debt. The ratings in the table represent the ratings of the entities providing payment assurance to Energy Holdings.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lease Receivables, Net of
Non-Recourse Debt
 
 
Counterparties’ Credit Rating Standard and Poor’s (S&P) as of September 30, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
As of September 30, 2019
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
AA
 
$
12

 
 
A-
 
58

 
 
BBB+ — BBB-
 
258

 
 
BB
 
133

 
 
NR
 
39

 
 
Total
 
$
500

 
 
 
 
 
 

The “BB” and the “NR” ratings in the preceding table represent lease receivables related to coal and gas-fired assets in Illinois and Pennsylvania, respectively. As of September 30, 2019, the gross investment in the leases of such assets, net of non-recourse debt, was $236 million ($(25) million, net of deferred taxes). A more detailed description of such assets under lease is presented in the following table.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset
 
Location
 
Gross
Investment
 
%
Owned
 
Total MW
 
Fuel
Type
 
Counterparties’
S&P Credit
Ratings
 
Counterparty
 
 
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Powerton Station Units 5 and 6
 
IL
 
$
75

 
64
%
 
1,538

 
Coal
 
BB
 
NRG Energy, Inc.
 
 
Joliet Station Units 7 and 8
 
IL
 
$
85

 
64
%
 
1,036

 
Gas
 
BB
 
NRG Energy, Inc.
 
 
Shawville Station Units 1, 2, 3 and 4
 
PA
 
$
76

 
100
%
 
596

 
Gas
 
NR
 
REMA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The credit exposure for lessors is partially mitigated through various credit enhancement mechanisms within the lease structures. These credit enhancement features vary from lease to lease. Upon the occurrence of certain defaults, indirect subsidiary companies of Energy Holdings would exercise their rights and seek recovery of their investment, potentially including stepping into the lease directly to protect their investments. While these actions could ultimately protect or mitigate the loss of value, they could require the use of significant capital and trigger certain material tax obligations which could, for certain leases, wholly or partially be mitigated by tax indemnification claims against the counterparty. A bankruptcy of a lessee would likely delay and potentially limit any efforts on the part of the lessors to assert their rights upon default and could delay the monetization of claims.
Additional factors that may impact future lease cash flows include, but are not limited to, new environmental legislation and regulation regarding air quality, water and other discharges in the process of generating electricity, market prices for fuel, electricity and capacity, overall financial condition of lease counterparties and their affiliates and the quality and condition of assets under lease.
Public Service Electric and Gas Company [Member]  
Schedule of Financial Receivables [Line Items]  
Financing Receivables Financing Receivables
PSE&G
PSE&G sponsors a solar loan program designed to help finance the installation of solar power systems throughout its electric service area. Interest income on the loans is recorded on an accrual basis. The loans are generally paid back with solar renewable energy certificates generated from the installed solar electric system. In the event of a loan default, the basis of the solar loan would be recovered through a regulatory recovery mechanism. None of the solar loans are impaired; however, in the event a loan becomes impaired, the basis of the loan would be recovered through a regulatory recovery mechanism. A substantial portion of these amounts are noncurrent and reported in Long-Term Investments on PSEG’s and PSE&G’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table reflects the outstanding loans by class of customer, none of which would be considered “non-performing.”
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Outstanding Loans by Class of Customer
 
 
 
 
As of
 
As of
 
 
Consumer Loans
 
September 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
Commercial/Industrial
 
$
153

 
$
164

 
 
Residential
 
8

 
9

 
 
Total
 
$
161

 
$
173

 
 
Current Portion (included in Accounts Receivable)
 
(24
)
 
(24
)
 
 
Noncurrent Portion (included in Long-Term Investments)
 
$
137

 
$
149

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy Holdings
Energy Holdings, through several of its indirect subsidiary companies, has investments in domestic energy and real estate assets subject primarily to leveraged lease accounting. A leveraged lease is typically comprised of an investment by an equity investor and debt provided by a third-party debt investor. The debt is recourse only to the assets subject to lease and is not included on PSEG’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As an equity investor, Energy Holdings’ equity investments in the leases are comprised of the total expected lease receivables over the lease terms plus the estimated residual values at the end of the lease terms, reduced for any income not yet earned on the leases. This amount is included in Long-Term Investments on PSEG’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The more rapid depreciation of the leased property for tax purposes creates tax cash flow that will be repaid to the taxing authority in later periods. As such, the liability for such taxes due is recorded in Deferred Income Taxes on PSEG’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During the second quarter of 2019, Energy Holdings completed its annual review of estimated residual values embedded in the leveraged leases. The outcome indicated that the updated residual value estimate of the coal-fired Powerton lease was lower than the recorded residual value and the decline was deemed to be other than temporary as a result of expected future adverse market conditions. As a result, a pre-tax write-down of $58 million was reflected in Operating Revenues in the quarter ended June 30, 2019, calculated by comparing the gross investment in the leases before and after the revised residual estimates.
The following table shows Energy Holdings’ gross and net lease investment as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of
 
As of
 
 
 
September 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
Lease Receivables (net of Non-Recourse Debt)
$
500

 
$
504

 
 
Estimated Residual Value of Leased Assets
201

 
326

 
 
Total Investment in Rental Receivables
701

 
830

 
 
Unearned and Deferred Income
(208
)
 
(290
)
 
 
Gross Investments in Leases
493

 
540

 
 
Deferred Tax Liabilities
(331
)
 
(354
)
 
 
Net Investments in Leases
$
162

 
$
186

 
 
 
 
 
 
 


The corresponding receivables associated with the lease portfolio are reflected as follows, net of non-recourse debt. The ratings in the table represent the ratings of the entities providing payment assurance to Energy Holdings.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lease Receivables, Net of
Non-Recourse Debt
 
 
Counterparties’ Credit Rating Standard and Poor’s (S&P) as of September 30, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
As of September 30, 2019
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
AA
 
$
12

 
 
A-
 
58

 
 
BBB+ — BBB-
 
258

 
 
BB
 
133

 
 
NR
 
39

 
 
Total
 
$
500

 
 
 
 
 
 

The “BB” and the “NR” ratings in the preceding table represent lease receivables related to coal and gas-fired assets in Illinois and Pennsylvania, respectively. As of September 30, 2019, the gross investment in the leases of such assets, net of non-recourse debt, was $236 million ($(25) million, net of deferred taxes). A more detailed description of such assets under lease is presented in the following table.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset
 
Location
 
Gross
Investment
 
%
Owned
 
Total MW
 
Fuel
Type
 
Counterparties’
S&P Credit
Ratings
 
Counterparty
 
 
 
 
 
 
Millions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Powerton Station Units 5 and 6
 
IL
 
$
75

 
64
%
 
1,538

 
Coal
 
BB
 
NRG Energy, Inc.
 
 
Joliet Station Units 7 and 8
 
IL
 
$
85

 
64
%
 
1,036

 
Gas
 
BB
 
NRG Energy, Inc.
 
 
Shawville Station Units 1, 2, 3 and 4
 
PA
 
$
76

 
100
%
 
596

 
Gas
 
NR
 
REMA
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The credit exposure for lessors is partially mitigated through various credit enhancement mechanisms within the lease structures. These credit enhancement features vary from lease to lease. Upon the occurrence of certain defaults, indirect subsidiary companies of Energy Holdings would exercise their rights and seek recovery of their investment, potentially including stepping into the lease directly to protect their investments. While these actions could ultimately protect or mitigate the loss of value, they could require the use of significant capital and trigger certain material tax obligations which could, for certain leases, wholly or partially be mitigated by tax indemnification claims against the counterparty. A bankruptcy of a lessee would likely delay and potentially limit any efforts on the part of the lessors to assert their rights upon default and could delay the monetization of claims.
Additional factors that may impact future lease cash flows include, but are not limited to, new environmental legislation and regulation regarding air quality, water and other discharges in the process of generating electricity, market prices for fuel, electricity and capacity, overall financial condition of lease counterparties and their affiliates and the quality and condition of assets under lease.