XML 117 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
Income Taxes
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Income Taxes [Line Items]  
Income Taxes
Income Taxes
PSEG’s, PSE&G’s and Power's effective tax rates for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
PSEG
35.0%
 
34.8%
 
38.5%
 
38.4%
 
 
PSE&G
38.4%
 
36.5%
 
39.0%
 
38.6%
 
 
Power
30.3%
 
28.9%
 
37.9%
 
37.8%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

An explanation of the material changes in the effective tax rates is as follows:
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, PSE&G's effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate of 40.85% due primarily to the beneficial impact of plant related flow-through items.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, Power’s effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate of 40.85% due primarily to the beneficial impact of the manufacturing deduction under Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and the benefit associated with the income tax rate differential of carrying back federal net operating tax losses under section 172(f) of the IRC.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in the prior year, PSE&G's increase was due primarily to the absence of the 2014 tax flow-through benefit associated with injuries and damages and an unfavorable increase in the flow-through of bad debt expense for 2015.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in the prior year, Power's increase was due primarily to the net reduction in the manufacturing deduction under Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code and a reduction in purchased state income tax credits, partially offset by the tax benefit associated with the income tax rate differential of carrying back federal net operating tax losses under section 172(f) of the IRC.
PSE And G [Member]  
Income Taxes [Line Items]  
Income Taxes
Income Taxes
PSEG’s, PSE&G’s and Power's effective tax rates for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
PSEG
35.0%
 
34.8%
 
38.5%
 
38.4%
 
 
PSE&G
38.4%
 
36.5%
 
39.0%
 
38.6%
 
 
Power
30.3%
 
28.9%
 
37.9%
 
37.8%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

An explanation of the material changes in the effective tax rates is as follows:
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, PSE&G's effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate of 40.85% due primarily to the beneficial impact of plant related flow-through items.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, Power’s effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate of 40.85% due primarily to the beneficial impact of the manufacturing deduction under Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and the benefit associated with the income tax rate differential of carrying back federal net operating tax losses under section 172(f) of the IRC.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in the prior year, PSE&G's increase was due primarily to the absence of the 2014 tax flow-through benefit associated with injuries and damages and an unfavorable increase in the flow-through of bad debt expense for 2015.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in the prior year, Power's increase was due primarily to the net reduction in the manufacturing deduction under Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code and a reduction in purchased state income tax credits, partially offset by the tax benefit associated with the income tax rate differential of carrying back federal net operating tax losses under section 172(f) of the IRC.
Power [Member]  
Income Taxes [Line Items]  
Income Taxes
Income Taxes
PSEG’s, PSE&G’s and Power's effective tax rates for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
PSEG
35.0%
 
34.8%
 
38.5%
 
38.4%
 
 
PSE&G
38.4%
 
36.5%
 
39.0%
 
38.6%
 
 
Power
30.3%
 
28.9%
 
37.9%
 
37.8%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

An explanation of the material changes in the effective tax rates is as follows:
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, PSE&G's effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate of 40.85% due primarily to the beneficial impact of plant related flow-through items.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, Power’s effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate of 40.85% due primarily to the beneficial impact of the manufacturing deduction under Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and the benefit associated with the income tax rate differential of carrying back federal net operating tax losses under section 172(f) of the IRC.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in the prior year, PSE&G's increase was due primarily to the absence of the 2014 tax flow-through benefit associated with injuries and damages and an unfavorable increase in the flow-through of bad debt expense for 2015.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in the prior year, Power's increase was due primarily to the net reduction in the manufacturing deduction under Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code and a reduction in purchased state income tax credits, partially offset by the tax benefit associated with the income tax rate differential of carrying back federal net operating tax losses under section 172(f) of the IRC.