XML 58 R36.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.4
Asset Retirement Obligations
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
Asset Retirement Obligation Disclosure [Abstract]  
Asset Retirement Obligations Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are recorded based on studies to estimate the amount and timing of future ARO expenditures and reflect underlying assumptions, such as discount rates, estimates of the future costs for decommissioning, and the timing of the removal activities to be performed. Approximately 68% of PNM’s total ARO liabilities are related to nuclear decommissioning of PVNGS. PNM is responsible for all decommissioning obligations related to its entire interest in PVNGS, including portions under lease both during and after termination of the leases. Studies of the decommissioning costs of PVNGS, SJGS, Four Corners, and other facilities are performed periodically and revisions to the ARO liabilities are recorded. Changes in the assumptions underlying the calculations may also require revisions to the estimated AROs when identified. A reconciliation of the ARO liabilities is as follows:
PNMRPNMTNMP
 (In thousands)
Liability at December 31, 2019$181,962 $181,081 $881 
Liabilities incurred— — — 
Liabilities settled(1,444)(1,192)(252)
Accretion expense11,310 11,236 74 
Revisions to estimated cash flows(1)
(8,407)(8,407)— 
Liability at December 31, 2020183,421 182,718 703 
Liabilities incurred1,781 1,781 — 
Liabilities settled(142)(142)— 
Accretion expense9,308 9,248 60 
Revisions to estimated cash flows(2)
39,778 39,778 — 
Liability at December 31, 2021234,146 233,383 763 
Liabilities incurred— — — 
Liabilities settled— — — 
Accretion expense10,767 10,702 65 
Revisions to estimated cash flows(3)
(21,536)(21,536)— 
Liability at December 31, 2022$223,377 $222,549 $828 
(1) Reflects a decrease of $9.2 million related to an updated PVNGS decommissioning study and an increase of $0.8 million related to an updated Four Corners decommissioning study.
(2) Reflects impacts of newly approved remediation ordinance in San Juan county requiring the full demolition of SJGS. See Note 16.
(3) Reflects a decrease of $21.5 million related to an updated SJGS decommissioning study.