XML 64 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Rate Matters
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Rate Matters [Abstract]  
Rate Matters
11.    Rate Matters

 Pending and Recently Concluded Regulatory Proceedings — CPUC
 
Base Rate

PSCo 2012 Gas and Steam Rate Case In December 2012, PSCo filed a multi-year request with the CPUC to increase Colorado retail natural gas rates by $48.5 million in 2013 with subsequent step increases of $9.9 million in 2014 and $12.1 million in 2015. PSCo also requested to increase Colorado retail steam rates by $1.6 million in 2013 with subsequent step increases of $0.9 million in 2014 and $2.3 million in 2015. Both requests are based on a 2013 forecast test year, a 10.5 percent ROE, a rate base of $1.3 billion for natural gas and $21 million for steam and an equity ratio of 56 percent. Final rates are expected to be effective in the third quarter of 2013.
 
PSCo is requesting an extension of its PSIA rider mechanism to collect the costs of accelerated pipeline integrity efforts, including system renewal projects. PSCo estimates that the PSIA will increase by $26.8 million in 2014 with a subsequent step increase of $24.7 million in 2015 in addition to the proposed changes in base rate revenue. In conjunction with the multi-year base rate step increases, PSCo is proposing a stay-out provision and an earnings test through the end of 2015.
 
PSCo 2011 Electric Rate Case  In November 2011, PSCo filed a request with the CPUC to increase Colorado retail electric rates by $141.9 million. The request was based on a 2012 forecast test year, a 10.75 percent ROE, an electric rate base of $5.4 billion and an equity ratio of 56 percent.
 
In April 2012, the CPUC approved a comprehensive multi-year settlement agreement, which covers 2012 through 2014. Key terms of the agreement include the following:

 
PSCo would implement an annual electric rate increase of $73 million in 2012. The rate increase was effective on May 1, 2012. In addition, PSCo will implement incremental electric rate increases of $16 million on Jan. 1, 2013 and $25 million on Jan. 1, 2014. These rate increases are net of the shift of the costs from the PCCA and the TCA clauses to base rates.
 
The settlement reflects an authorized ROE of 10 percent and an equity ratio of 56 percent.
 
For 2012 through 2014, incremental property taxes in excess of $76.7 million (2010-2011 historic test year property taxes) will be deferred over a three-year period with the amortization effective the first year after the deferral. To the extent that PSCo is successful in the manufacturer's sales tax refund lawsuit, PSCo will credit such refunds first against legal fees incurred to obtain the refund and then against the deferred property tax balances outstanding at the end of the 2014. Regarding the manufacturer's sales tax refund case, PSCo was successful in the District Court and Court of Appeals, but in January 2013 the Colorado Supreme Court agreed to review this matter following an appeal by the Colorado Department of Revenue. Briefing will be completed by both parties in the next few months. It is uncertain when the Colorado Supreme Court will issue its decision.
 
The signing parties agreed to implement an earnings test, in which customers and shareholders will share weather normalized earnings above an ROE of 10 percent. The sharing mechanism is as follows:

ROE
 
Shareholders
   
Customers
 
> 10.0% < 10.2%
 
40
%
 
60
%
> 10.2% < 10.5%
 
50
   
50
 
> 10.5%
 
-
   
100
 
 
 
PSCo agreed that it will not file for an electric rate increase that would take effect prior to Jan. 1, 2015, provided that net revenue requirements increase or decrease in excess of $10 million caused by changes in tax law, government mandates, or natural disasters may be deferred or recovered through a modified rate adjustment. In the event normalized base revenues in either 2012 or 2013 are 2.0 percent below 2011 actual levels adjusted to reflect the rate increases allowed for 2012 and 2013, PSCo has the right to an additional rate adjustment in the next year for 50 percent of the shortfall. The parties acknowledged that PSCo may file an electric rate increase as early as May 1, 2014, so long as no rate increase takes effect on either an interim or permanent basis prior to Jan. 1, 2015.
 
SmartGridCity (SGC) Cost Recovery PSCo requested recovery of the revenue requirements associated with $45 million of capital and $4 million of annual O&M costs incurred to develop and operate SGC as part of its 2010 electric rate case. In February 2011, the CPUC allowed recovery of approximately $28 million of the capital cost and all of the O&M costs. In December 2011, PSCo requested CPUC approval for the recovery of the remaining capital investment in SGC and also provided the additional information requested. On Jan. 17, 2013, the ALJ recommended denial of PSCo's request for recovery of the remaining portion of the SGC investment. On Feb. 6, 2013, PSCo filed exceptions to the ALJ recommendation requesting that the CPUC grant recovery of its investment. However, as a result of the ALJ's recommended decision denying recovery, PSCo recognized a $10.7 million pre-tax charge in 2012, representing the net book value of the disallowed investment, which is included in O&M expense.

Electric, Purchased Gas and Resource Adjustment Clauses

DSM and the DSMCA The CPUC approved higher savings goals and a slightly higher financial incentive mechanism for PSCo's electric DSM energy efficiency programs starting in 2012. Savings goals are 330 GWh in 2012 and 356 GWh in 2013 with incentives awarded as one installment in the year following plan achievements. PSCo is able to earn an incentive on 11 percent of net economic benefits at an achievement level of 130 percent and a maximum annual incentive of $30 million.
 
The CPUC approved the PSCo electric and gas DSM budget of $115.5 million and $13.3 million, respectively, effective Jan. 1, 2013. Energy efficiency and demand response related DSM costs are recovered through a combination of the DSMCA riders and base rates. Electric DSMCA rates are designed to collect $26.8 million in 2013 with the remainder of the electric DSM expenditures collected through base rates. DSMCA riders are adjusted biannually to capture program costs, performance incentives, and any over- or under-recoveries are trued-up in the following year.

REC Sharing In May 2011, the CPUC determined that margin sharing on stand-alone REC transactions would be shared 20 percent to PSCo and 80 percent to customers beginning in 2011 and ultimately becoming 10 percent to PSCo and 90 percent to customers by 2014. The CPUC also approved a change to the treatment of hybrid REC trading margins (RECs that are bundled with energy) that allows the customers' share of the margins to be netted against the RESA regulatory asset balance.

In March 2012, the CPUC approved an annual margin sharing on the first $20 million of margins on hybrid REC trades of 80 percent to the customers and 20 percent to PSCo. Margins in excess of the $20 million are to be shared 90 percent to the customers and 10 percent to PSCo. The CPUC authorized PSCo to return to customers unspent carbon offset funds by crediting the RESA regulatory asset balance. PSCo credited the RESA regulatory asset balance $46 million and $37 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The credits include the customers' share of REC trading margins and the customers' share of carbon offset funds.

This sharing mechanism will be effective through 2014 to provide the CPUC an opportunity to review the framework and to review evidence regarding actual deliveries in relatively more complex markets.

Pending and Recently ConcludedRegulatory Proceedings — FERC

Base Rate

PSCo Transmission Formula Rate CasesIn April 2012, PSCo filed with the FERC to revise the wholesale transmission formula rates from a historic test year formula rate to a forecast transmission formula rate and to establish formula ancillary services rates. PSCo proposed that the formula rates be updated annually to reflect changes in costs, subject to a true-up. The request would increase PSCo's wholesale transmission and ancillary services revenue by approximately $2.0 million annually. Various transmission customers taking service under the tariff protested the filing. In June 2012, the FERC issued an order accepting the proposed transmission and ancillary services formula rates, suspending the increase to November 2012, subject to refund, and setting the case for settlement judge or hearing procedures. PSCo has been engaged in discovery and initial settlement discussions with the intervenors and the FERC Staff.

Separately, several wholesale customers filed a complaint with the FERC in June 2012 seeking to have the transmission formula rate ROE reduced from 10.25 to 9.15 percent effective July 1, 2012. If implemented, the ROE reduction would reduce PSCo transmission and ancillary rate revenues by approximately $1.8 million annually. In October 2012, the FERC issued an order accepting the complaint, consolidating the complaint with the April 2012 formula rate change filing, establishing a refund effective date of July 1, 2012, and setting the complaint for settlement judge and hearing procedures. The consolidated dockets are now in settlement discussions. If PSCo, the FERC Staff and intervenors do not reach settlement, the dockets would proceed to a contested hearing.

PSCo 2011 Wholesale Electric Rate Case In February 2011, PSCo filed with the FERC to change Colorado wholesale electric rates to formula based rates with an expected annual increase of $16.1 million for 2011. The request was based on a 2011 forecast test year, a 10.9 percent ROE, a rate base of $407.4 million and an equity ratio of 57.1 percent. The formula rate would be estimated each year for the following year and then trued-up to actual costs after the conclusion of the calendar year. In September 2011, PSCo implemented an interim rate increase of $7.8 million, subject to refund.

In April 2012, PSCo filed an unopposed settlement agreement with wholesale customers for an annual rate increase of $7.8 million, reflecting a reduction to depreciation expense of $5.8 million and a lower ROE, ranging from 10.1 percent to 10.4 percent. The settlement was approved by the FERC in June 2012.