XML 29 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.1
Commitments and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2019
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Contingencies
PSCo is involved in various litigation matters that are being defended and handled in the ordinary course of business. The assessment of whether a loss is probable or is a reasonable possibility, and whether the loss or a range of loss is estimable, often involves complex judgments about future events. Management maintains accruals for losses that are probable of being incurred and subject to reasonable estimation.
Management is sometimes unable to estimate an amount or range of a reasonably possible loss in certain situations, including when (1) the damages sought are indeterminate, (2) the proceedings are in the early stages, or (3) the matters involve novel or unsettled legal theories. In such cases, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the timing or ultimate resolution of such matters, including a possible eventual loss. For current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on PSCo’s financial statements. Unless otherwise required by GAAP, legal fees are expensed as incurred.
Employment, Tort and Commercial Litigation
Line Extension Disputes — In December 2015, the DRC filed a lawsuit seeking monetary damages in the Denver District Court, stating PSCo failed to award proper allowances and refunds for line extensions to new developments pursuant to the terms of electric and gas service agreements. The dispute involves claims by over fifty developers. In February 2018, the Colorado Supreme Court denied DRC’s petition to appeal the Denver District Court’s dismissal of the lawsuit, effectively terminating this litigation. However, in January 2018, DRC filed a new lawsuit in Boulder County District Court, asserting a single claim that PSCo was required to file its line extension agreements with the CPUC but failed to do so.
This claim is substantially similar to the arguments previously raised by DRC. PSCo filed a motion to dismiss this claim, which was granted in May 2018. DRC subsequently filed an appeal to the Colorado Court of Appeals with its opening brief in January 2019 and PSCo filed its answer brief in February 2019. DRC’s Answer-Reply Brief was filed March 18, 2019. PSCo filed a limited final Reply Brief on April 8, 2019 and the DRC subsequently requested an oral argument. It is uncertain when a decision will be rendered.
PSCo has concluded that a loss is remote with respect to both of these matters as the service agreements were developed to implement CPUC approved tariffs and PSCo has complied with the tariff provisions. If a loss were sustained, PSCo believes it would be allowed to recover costs through traditional regulatory mechanisms. Amount or range in dispute is presently unknown and no accrual has been recorded for this matter.
Environmental
MGP, Landfill or Disposal Sites — PSCo is currently investigating or remediating three MGP, landfill or other disposal sites across its service territories, and these activities will continue through at least 2020. PSCo accrued $0.9 million and $0.6 million as of March 31, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2018, respectively, for these sites. There may be insurance recovery and/or recovery from other potentially responsible parties, offsetting a portion of the costs incurred.
Environmental Requirements — Water and Waste
Coal Ash Regulation PSCo’s operations are subject to federal and state laws that impose requirements for handling, storage, treatment and disposal of solid waste. In 2015, the EPA published the CCR Rule. Litigation was brought challenging the rule in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Under the CCR Rule, utilities are required to complete groundwater sampling around their CCR landfills and surface impoundments. PSCo has identified two sites where a statistically significant increase of certain constituents exists in the groundwater near landfills and/or impoundments. The groundwater monitored at those two sites is directly adjacent to the CCR units and does not indicate any impact to local drinking water. PSCo has completed removal of CCR from these impoundments and plans to close these landfills. By the end of 2019, only six of PSCo’s regulated ash units are expected to be in operation. PSCo is conducting additional groundwater sampling, initiating the assessment of corrective measures as required by the CCR Rule, and will evaluate whether corrective action is required at any CCR landfills or surface impoundments.
Until PSCo completes its assessment, it is uncertain what impact, if any, there will be on the operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Leases
PSCo evaluates a variety of contracts that may contain leases, including PPAs and arrangements for the use of office space and other facilities, vehicles and equipment. Under ASC Topic 842, adopted by PSCo on Jan. 1, 2019, a contract contains a lease if it conveys the exclusive right to control the use of a specific asset. A contract determined to contain a lease is evaluated further to determine if the arrangement is a finance lease.
ROU assets represent PSCo's rights to use leased assets. Starting in 2019, the present value of future operating lease payments are recognized in other current liabilities and noncurrent operating lease liabilities. These amounts, adjusted for any prepayments or incentives, are recognized as operating lease ROU assets.
Most of PSCo’s leases do not contain a readily determinable discount rate, and therefore the present value of future lease payments is calculated using the estimated incremental borrowing rate for similar borrowing periods (weighted-average of 4.1%). PSCo has elected to utilize the practical expedient under which non-lease components, such as asset maintenance costs included in payments to the lessor, are not deducted from minimum lease payments for the purposes of lease accounting and disclosure.
Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are classified as short-term leases and are not recognized on the consolidated balance sheet.
Operating lease ROU assets:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
March 31, 2019
PPAs
 
$
585.1

Other
 
67.7

Gross operating lease ROU assets
 
652.8

Accumulated amortization
 
(19.8
)
Net operating lease ROU assets
 
$
633.0


In 2019, ROU assets for finance leases are included in other noncurrent assets, and the present value of future finance lease payments are included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities. Prior to 2019, finance leases were included in property, plant and equipment, the current portion of long-term debt and long-term debt.
PSCo’s most significant finance lease activities are related to WYCO. WYCO is a joint venture with CIG to develop and lease natural gas pipeline, storage and compression facilities. Xcel Energy Inc. has a 50% ownership interest in WYCO. WYCO leases its facilities to CIG, and CIG operates the facilities, providing natural gas storage and transportation services to PSCo under separate service agreements.
PSCo accounts for its Totem natural gas storage service and Front Range pipeline arrangements with CIG and WYCO, respectively, as finance leases. Xcel Energy Inc. eliminates 50% of the finance lease obligation related to WYCO in the consolidated balance sheet along with an equal amount of Xcel Energy Inc.’s equity investment in WYCO.
Finance lease ROU assets:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
March 31, 2019
Gas storage facilities
 
$
200.5

Gas pipeline
 
20.7

Gross finance lease ROU assets
 
221.2

Accumulated amortization
 
(77.7
)
Net finance lease ROU assets
 
$
143.5


Given the impacts of accounting for regulated operations, and the resulting recognition of periodic expense at the amounts recovered in customer rates, cash expenditures for both operating and finance leases are consistent with recognized lease expense.
Components of lease expense:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Operating leases
 
 
PPA capacity payments
 
$
24.3

Other operating leases (a)
 
3.5

Total operating lease expense (b)
 
$
27.8

 
 
 
Finance leases
 
 
Amortization of ROU assets
 
$
1

Interest expense on lease liability
 
5

Total finance lease expense
 
$
6

(a) 
Includes short-term lease expense of $0.3 million.
(b) 
PPA capacity payments are included in electric fuel and purchased power on the consolidated statements of income. Expense for other operating leases is included in O&M expense and electric fuel and purchased power.
Future commitments under operating and finance leases as of March 31, 2019:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
PPA (a) (b)
Operating
Leases
 
Other Operating
Leases
 
Total
Operating
Leases
 
Finance Leases
2019
 
$
71.6

 
$
9.6

 
$
81.2

 
$
18.7

2020
 
95.9

 
13.0

 
108.9

 
24.8

2021
 
96.4

 
12.0

 
108.4

 
23.6

2022
 
82.6

 
11.0

 
93.6

 
20.5

2023
 
70.0

 
10.9

 
80.9

 
20.3

Thereafter
 
288.6

 
29.2

 
317.8

 
420.4

Total minimum obligation
 
705.1

 
85.7

 
790.8

 
528.3

Interest component of obligation
 
(112.4
)
 
(14.5
)
 
(126.9
)
 
(384.8
)
Present value of minimum obligation
 
$
592.7

 
$
71.2

 
663.9

 
143.5

Less current portion
 
 
 
 
 
(82.8
)
 
(6.3
)
Noncurrent operating and finance lease liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
$
581.1

 
$
137.2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average remaining lease term in years
 
 
 
 
 
8.3

 
39.2

(a) 
Amounts do not include PPAs accounted for as executory contracts and/or contingent payments, such as energy payments on renewable PPAs.
(b) 
PPA operating leases contractually expire at various dates through 2032.
Future commitments under operating and finance leases as of Dec. 31, 2018:
(Millions of Dollars)
 
PPA (a) (b)
Operating
Leases
 
Other Operating
Leases
 
Total
Operating
Leases
 
Finance Leases
2019
 
$
95.5

 
$
10.8

 
$
106.3

 
$
24.9

2020
 
95.9

 
10.7

 
106.6

 
24.8

2021
 
96.4

 
9.5

 
105.9

 
23.6

2022
 
82.6

 
8.4

 
91.0

 
20.5

2023
 
70.0

 
8.1

 
78.1

 
20.3

Thereafter
 
288.6

 
53.4

 
342.0

 
420.4

Total minimum obligation
 


 


 


 
534.5

Interest component of obligation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(389.5
)
Present value of minimum obligation
 
 
 
 
 
$
145.0

(a) 
Amounts do not include PPAs accounted for as executory contracts and/or contingent payments, such as energy payments on renewable PPAs.
(b) 
PPA operating leases contractually expire at various dates through 2032.
Variable Interest Entities 
Under certain PPAs, PSCo purchases power from IPPs for which PSCo is required to reimburse fuel costs, or to participate in tolling arrangements under which PSCo procures the natural gas required to produce the energy that it purchases. These specific PPAs create a variable interest in the associated IPP.
PSCo had approximately 1,571 MW of capacity under long-term PPAs as of March 31, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2018, with entities that have been determined to be VIEs. PSCo concluded that these entities are not required to be consolidated in its consolidated financial statements because it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entities’ economic performance. These agreements have expiration dates through 2032.