XML 78 R51.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Ivy Funds VIP Value
Ivy Funds VIP Value
Objective
To seek to provide capital appreciation.
Fees and Expenses
This table describes the fees and expenses that you may pay if you buy and hold shares of the Portfolio. The table below does not reflect any fees and expenses imposed under the variable life insurance policies and variable annuity contracts (collectively, Policies) through which this Portfolio is offered. See the Policy prospectus for a description of those fees and expenses.
Shareholder Fees

(fees paid directly from your investment)
Shareholder Fees (USD $)
Ivy Funds VIP Value
Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from your investment)   
Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses

(expenses that you pay each year as a % of the value of your investment)
Annual Fund Operating Expenses
Ivy Funds VIP Value
Management Fees 0.70%
Distribution and Service (12b-1) Fees 0.25%
Other Expenses 0.06%
Total Annual Portfolio Operating Expenses 1.01%
Example
This example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the shares of the Portfolio with the cost of investing in other portfolios. This example does not reflect any fees and expenses imposed under the Policies.

The example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the shares of the Portfolio for the time periods indicated. The example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and that the Portfolio’s operating expenses remain the same. The costs are the same for each time period if you continue to hold your shares or if you redeem all your shares at the end of those periods. Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, based on these assumptions, your costs would be:
Expense Example (USD $)
1 Year
3 Years
5 Years
10 Years
Ivy Funds VIP Value
103 322 558 1,236
Portfolio Turnover
The Portfolio pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or “turns over” its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs. These costs, which are not reflected in annual portfolio operating expenses or in the example, affect the Portfolio’s performance. During the most recent fiscal year, the Portfolio’s portfolio turnover rate was 60% of the average value of its portfolio.
Principal Investment Strategies
Ivy Funds VIP Value seeks to achieve its objective by investing in the common stocks of primarily large cap companies that Waddell & Reed Investment Management Company (WRIMCO), the Portfolio’s investment manager, believes are undervalued, trading at a significant discount relative to the intrinsic value of the company estimated by WRIMCO and/or are out of favor in the financial markets but have a favorable outlook for capital appreciation. Although the Portfolio primarily invests in securities issued by large cap companies (typically, companies with market capitalizations of at least $10 billion), it may invest in securities issued by companies of any size. The Portfolio seeks to be diversified across economic sectors in an effort to manage risk, and to prevent excess volatility.

To identify securities for the Portfolio, WRIMCO primarily utilizes fundamental, bottom-up research while considering a top-down (assess the market environment) and quantitative analysis. The estimated intrinsic value of companies is primarily determined by WRIMCO based on cash flow generation, but other valuation factors are also considered such as price to earnings and price to book value. WRIMCO also considers a company’s asset growth, changes in share count, and changes in working capital. The Portfolio emphasizes companies which may have a clearly identifiable catalyst that WRIMCO believes will help the company achieve its estimated intrinsic value. The Portfolio typically holds a small number (generally 35 to 45) of stocks.

Many U.S. companies have diverse operations, with products or services in foreign markets. Therefore, the Portfolio will have an indirect exposure to foreign markets through investments in these companies.

WRIMCO will typically sell a stock when, in WRIMCO’s opinion, it reaches an acceptable price, its fundamental factors have changed or it has performed below WRIMCO’s expectations. WRIMCO also may sell a security to reduce the Portfolio’s holding in that security, to take advantage of more attractive investment opportunities or to raise cash.
Principal Investment Risks
As with any mutual fund, the value of the Portfolio’s shares will change, and you could lose money on your investment.

A variety of factors can affect the investment performance of the Portfolio and prevent it from achieving its objective. These include:
  • Catalyst Risk. Investing in companies in anticipation of a catalyst carries the risk that certain of such catalysts may not happen or the market may react differently than expected to such catalysts, in which case the Portfolio may experience losses.
  • Company Risk. A company may perform worse than the overall market due to specific factors, such as adverse changes to its business or investor perceptions about the company.
  • Foreign Market Risk. The securities of many companies may have significant exposure to foreign markets as a result of the company’s products or services in foreign markets so that its domicile and/or the markets in which its securities trade may not be reflective of its sources of revenue. Such securities would be subject to some of the same risks as an investment in foreign securities, including the risk that political and economic events unique to a country or region will adversely affect those markets in which the company’s products or services are sold.
  • Holdings Risk. The Portfolio tends to be invested in a small number (generally 35 to 45) of stocks. As a result, the appreciation or depreciation of any one security held by the Portfolio will have a greater impact on the Portfolio’s net asset value (NAV) than it would if the Portfolio invested in a larger number of securities.
  • Large Company Risk. Large capitalization companies may be unable to respond quickly to new competitive challenges, such as changes in technology, and also may not be able to attain the high growth rate of successful smaller companies, especially during extended periods of economic expansion.
  • Management Risk. Portfolio performance is primarily dependent on WRIMCO’s skill in evaluating and managing the Portfolio’s holdings and the Portfolio may not perform as well as other similar mutual funds.
  • Market Risk. Adverse market conditions, sometimes in response to general economic or industry news, may cause the prices of the Portfolio’s holdings to fall as part of a broad market decline. The financial crisis in the U.S. and foreign economies over the past several years, including the European sovereign debt crisis, has resulted, and may continue to result, in an unusually high degree of volatility in the financial markets, both U.S. and foreign, and in the net asset values (NAVs) of many mutual funds, including to some extent the Portfolio. Global economies and financial markets are becoming increasingly interconnected, which increases the possibilities that conditions in one country or region may adversely affect issuers in another country or region, which may adversely affect securities held by the Portfolio. These circumstances have also decreased liquidity in some markets and may continue to do so. In addition, certain unanticipated events, such as natural disasters, terrorist attacks, war, and other geopolitical events, can have a dramatic adverse effect on securities held by the Portfolio.
  • Value Stock Risk. Value stocks are stocks of companies that may have experienced adverse business or industry developments or may be subject to special risks that have caused the stocks to be out of favor and, in the opinion of WRIMCO, undervalued. The value of a security believed by WRIMCO to be undervalued may never reach what is believed to be its full value, or such security’s value may decrease.
Performance
The chart and table below provide some indication of the risks of investing in the Portfolio. The chart shows how performance has varied from year to year for the Portfolio. The table shows the average annual total returns for the Portfolio and also compares the performance with those of an index and a Lipper peer group (a universe of mutual funds with investment objectives similar to that of the Portfolio). The performance results do not reflect any Policy-related fees and expenses, which would reduce the performance results.

Performance results include the effect of expense reduction arrangements for some or all of the periods shown. If those arrangements had not been in place, the performance results for those periods would have been lower.

During the periods for which performance is shown, the Portfolio’s investment objective was to seek long-term capital appreciation. Effective as of the date of this Prospectus, the Portfolio changed its investment objective to seeking to provide capital appreciation.

The Portfolio’s past performance does not necessarily indicate how it will perform in the future. Current performance may be lower or higher. Please call 888.WADDELL for the Portfolio’s updated performance.
Chart of Year-by-Year Returns
as of December 31 each year
Bar Chart
In the period shown in the chart, the highest quarterly return was 20.05% (the third quarter of 2009) and the lowest quarterly return was -20.08 % (the third quarter of 2011).
Average Annual Total Returns
as of December 31, 2011
Average Annual Total Returns
1 Year
5 Years
10 Years
Ivy Funds VIP Value
(7.32%) (1.24%) 3.69%
Russell 1000 Value Index (reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes) Ivy Funds VIP Value
0.39% (2.64%) 3.89%
Lipper Variable Annuity Large-Cap Value Funds Universe Average (net of fees and expenses) Ivy Funds VIP Value
(1.85%) (2.54%) 2.86%