XML 58 R30.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

22. Fair Value Measurements

 

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

In accordance with ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”), certain of the Company's assets and liabilities, which are carried at fair value, are classified in one of the following three categories:

 

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

 

The Company's financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

   December 31, Fair Value Measurements Using
   2012 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
 Financial assets (liabilities):            
  Interest rate contracts1 $ - $ - $ - $ -
  Forward currency exchange contracts1  (406)   -   (406)   -
  Nonqualified savings plan assets (a)   11,347   11,347   -   -
  Marketable securities(b)   6,042   6,042   -   -
 Total  $ 16,983 $ 17,389 $ (406) $ -
              
   December 31, Fair Value Measurements Using
   2011 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
 Financial assets (liabilities):            
  Forward currency exchange contracts   260   -   260   -
  Nonqualified savings plan assets (a)   8,264   8,264   -   -
  Marketable securities(b)   4,412   4,412   -   -
 Total  $ 12,936 $ 12,676 $ 260 $ -
              
(a)a aThe nonqualified savings plan assets have an offsetting liability of equal amount, which is included in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses" in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
(b)a a aCumulative unrealized total gains/(losses), net of tax, on these equity securities of $0.3 million and ($0.8) million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" in the Company's consolidated statements of equity.

The Company measures the fair value of its forward currency exchange contracts under Level 2 inputs as defined by ASC 820-10. For these forward currency exchange contracts, standard valuation models are used to determine fair value. The significant inputs used in these models are derived from observable market transactions. During the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no transfers of assets in or out of Level 1 or Level 2 fair value measurements.

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis

 

The Company measures non-financial assets and liabilities such as property and equipment and intangible assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis or when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may be impaired. During the third quarter of 2012, the Company announced the Mexico Reorganization. See Note 4 for further information related to this reorganization. The Mexico Reorganization was considered a triggering event for purposes of impairment testing of the retail services segment. The Company tested property and equipment and intangible assets for impairment following the approval of the reorganization plan by the Company's Board of Directors. The results of the Company's testing indicated that the carrying value of certain property and equipment exceeded the future cash flows associated with these assets. The results of the Company's testing of certain intangible assets indicated that the carrying value of these intangible assets exceeded their fair value. As a result, during the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recognized impairment charges and losses on property and equipment, indefinite-lived intangible assets and other intangible assets related to its Mexico operations of $7.5 million (consisting of $6.0 million of impairment charges recognized in the third quarter of 2012 and $1.5 million of losses on disposition incurred in the fourth quarter of 2012), $2.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively, all of which are included in “Depreciation and amortization expenses” in the consolidated statements of income. The fair value measurements of property and equipment and intangible assets are considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, as they are based on management's judgments about future cash flows.

 

Following the announcement of the Mexico Reorganization, the Company also evaluated goodwill in the retail services segment and noted no impairment.

 

Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value

 

The Company's financial assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 that are not measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

  Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value
  December 31, December 31, Fair Value Measurement Using
  2012 2012 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Financial assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $ 63,134 $ 63,134 $ 63,134 $ - $ -
Pawn loans   244,640   244,640   -   -   244,640
Consumer loans, net   289,418   289,418   -   -   289,418
Pawn loan fees and service charges receivable   48,991   48,991   -   -   48,991
Total $ 646,183 $ 646,183 $ 63,134 $ - $ 583,049
                
Financial liabilities:               
Domestic and Multi-currency Line of credit $ 301,011 $ 309,969 $ - $ 309,969 $ -
Senior unsecured notes    167,122   165,961   -   165,961   -
2009 Convertible Notes   110,197   186,300   -   186,300   -
Total $ 578,330 $ 662,230 $ - $ 662,230 $ -
                
  Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value
  December 31, December 31, Fair Value Measurement Using
  2011 2011 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Financial assets:               
Cash and cash equivalents $ 62,542 $ 62,542 $ 62,542 $ - $ -
Pawn loans   253,519   253,519   -   -   253,519
Consumer loans, net   222,778   222,778   -   -   222,778
Pawn loan fees and service charges receivable   48,003   48,003   -   -   48,003
Total $ 586,842 $ 586,842 $ 62,542 $ - $ 524,300
                
Financial liabilities:                
Domestic and Multi-currency Line of credit $ 280,839 $ 291,983 $ - $ 291,983 $ -
Senior unsecured notes    149,394   147,721   -   147,721   -
2009 Convertible Notes   107,058   220,642   -   220,642   -
Total  $ 537,291 $ 660,346 $ - $ 660,346 $ -

Cash and cash equivalents bear interest at market rates and have maturities of less than 90 days.

 

Pawn loans generally have maturity periods of less than 90 days. If a pawn loan defaults, the Company disposes of the collateral. Historically, collateral has sold for an amount in excess of the principal amount of the loan.

 

Consumer loans are carried in the consolidated balance sheet net of the allowance for estimated loan losses, which is calculated by applying historical loss rates combined with recent default trends to the gross consumer loan balance. The unobservable inputs used to calculate the carrying value of consumer loans include historical loss rates and recent default trends. Consumer loans have relatively short maturity periods that are generally 12 months or less.

 

Pawn loan fees and service charges receivable are accrued ratably over the term of the loan based on the portion of these pawn loans deemed collectible. The Company uses historical performance data to determine collectability of pawn loan fees and service charges receivable. Additionally, pawn loan fee and service charge rates are determined by regulations and bear no valuation relationship to the capital markets' interest rate movements.

 

The Company measures the fair value of long-term debt instruments using Level 2 inputs. The fair values of the Company's long-term debt instruments are estimated based on market values for debt issues with similar characteristics or rates currently available for debt with similar terms. As of December 31, 2012, the Company's Domestic and Multi-currency Line of credit had a higher fair market value than the carrying value due to the difference in yield when compared to recent issuances of similar types of credit. As of December 31, 2012, the Company's senior unsecured notes had a lower fair market value than the carrying value due to the difference in yield when compared to recent issuances of similar senior unsecured notes. As of December 31, 2012, the 2009 Convertible Notes had a higher fair value than carrying value due to the Company's stock price as of each period presented above exceeding the applicable conversion price for the 2009 Convertible Notes, thereby increasing the value of the instrument for bondholders.