XML 27 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

11. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, commodity purchase contracts and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values because of the nature of such instruments. The fair values of our outstanding notes, as shown in the table below, are based on quoted market values. The fair value of our New Term Loan Facility is based on present rates for indebtedness with similar amounts, durations and credit risk. Our commodity purchase contracts are fair valued with Level 2 inputs based on quoted market values for similar but not identical financial instruments. When computed for the purposes of impairment testing, the fair values of our goodwill and other acquired intangible assets are determined using Level 3 inputs. For further details concerning the fair value of goodwill and other intangible assets, see Note 8 of the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

The FASB’s ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. These levels, in order of highest to lowest priority, are described below:

 

Level 1 —   Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
Level 2 —   Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
Level 3 —   Prices that are unobservable for the asset or liability and are developed based on the best information available under the circumstances, which might include the Company’s own data.

The following is a summary of the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our long-term debt and commodity purchase contracts as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

 

     March 31, 2016      December 31, 2015  

(In millions)

         Carrying      
Value
     Fair
      Value       
           Carrying      
Value
     Fair
      Value       
 

Level 1:

           

Long-term debt:

 

           

 

4.625 Notes (net of debt issuance costs totaling $9.2 million and $9.6 million at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)

     $ 678.8          $ 666.9          $ 678.4          $ 635.1    

4.875 Notes (net of debt issuance costs totaling $5.6 million and $5.8 million at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 , respectively)

     $ 444.4          $ 440.7          $ 444.2          $ 408.4    

Level 2:

           

Long-term debt:

 

           

 

New Term Loan Facility (net of deferred financing fees totaling $3.0 million and $3.1 million at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)

     $ 243.9          $ 247.2          $ 244.4          $ 247.8    

Derivative instruments:

           

Commodity purchase contracts

     $ (0.4)         $ (0.4)         $ (0.4)         $ (0.4)   

Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company is directly and indirectly affected by changes in certain market conditions and market risks. When deemed appropriate, we use derivatives as a risk management tool to mitigate the potential impact of certain market risks. The primary market risks that may be managed by the Company through the use of derivative instruments are foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk and interest rate risk. As an integral part of our risk management program, we may manage our financial exposures to reduce the potentially adverse effect that the volatility of the commodity markets may have on our operating results. We do not engage in speculative transactions nor do we hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.

All derivative financial instruments are carried at fair value in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. If the derivative financial instrument qualifies for hedge accounting treatment, changes in the fair value are either offset against the change in fair value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings.

 

We also enter into derivative financial instruments that are designed to hedge risks but are not designated as hedging instruments. Changes in the fair values of these non-designated hedging instruments are adjusted to fair values through earnings in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

We formally document hedging instruments and hedging transactions, as well as our risk management objective and strategy for undertaking hedged transactions. This process includes linking derivative financial instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges to specific assets or liabilities on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets or linking derivatives to forecasted transactions. We also formally assess, both at inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative financial instruments used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair values or cash flows of hedged transactions. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective or the derivative is expired, sold, terminated, exercised, discontinued, or otherwise settled because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur, we discontinue the use of hedge accounting for that specific hedge derivative financial instrument.