XML 30 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Contingencies
 6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Contingencies Disclosure Contingencies
We accrue estimates for resolution of any legal and other contingencies when losses are probable and reasonably estimable in accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies ("ASC 450"). No less than quarterly, and as facts and circumstances change, we review the status of each significant matter underlying a legal proceeding or claim and assess our potential financial exposure. We accrue a liability for an estimated loss if the potential loss from any legal proceeding or claim is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of probability and the determination as to whether the amount of an exposure is reasonably estimable, and accruals are based only on the information available to our management at the time the judgment is made, which may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate or unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change those estimates and assumptions. Furthermore, the outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, and we may incur substantial defense costs and expenses defending any of these matters. Should any one or a combination of more than one of these proceedings be successful, or should we determine to settle any one or a combination of these matters, we may be required to pay substantial sums, become subject to the entry of an injunction or be forced to change the manner in which we operate our business, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
As previously disclosed, we continue to be in dispute with Fujitsu Services Limited ("Fujitsu") regarding Fujitsu's obligation to pay amounts to us due upon the termination of a subcontract, including client receivables, in connection with Fujitsu's contract as the prime contractor in the National Health Service ("NHS") initiative to automate clinical processes and digitize medical records in the Southern region of England. The NHS terminated its contract with Fujitsu, which gave rise to the termination of our subcontract with Fujitsu. We filed a request for arbitration with the London Court of International Arbitration on April 22, 2019 seeking damages. On December 30, 2019, Fujitsu filed its Defense and Counterclaim (the "Counterclaim") in response. In its Counterclaim, Fujitsu defends against our claim in full and argues that we are liable to Fujitsu for: (i) £306 million in damages based on our alleged fraudulent misrepresentations inducing Fujitsu to enter into the subcontract; or (ii) alternatively, £173.8 million in damages based on our alleged breaches of the subcontract.

We filed our response to Fujitsu's Counterclaim on May 1, 2020. We believe that Fujitsu's claims are without merit and will vigorously defend against them, and we continue to believe that we have valid and equitable grounds for recovery of the disputed client receivables; however, there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the dispute. As previously
disclosed, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $45 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 to provide an allowance against the disputed client receivables reflecting the uncertainty in collection of such receivables and related litigation risk resulting from the conclusion of the non-binding alternative dispute resolution procedures, which occurred before we filed our request for arbitration. We have not concluded that a loss related to the new claims raised by Fujitsu in the Counterclaim is probable, nor have we accrued a liability related to these claims beyond the previously reported pre-tax charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2018. Although we believe a loss may be reasonably possible (as defined in ASC 450), we do not have sufficient information to determine the amount or range of reasonably possible loss with respect to the Counterclaim given that the dispute is in the early stages of the arbitration process. Arbitration is not currently expected to occur before 2022.
Cerner Health Services, Inc. ("Cerner HS"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Cerner Corporation, filed a lawsuit in the Chester County, Pennsylvania, Court of Common Pleas against NextGen Healthcare Information Systems, LLC ("NextGen") relating to a dispute arising out of a supplier relationship initially established between Siemens Health Services, Inc. and NextGen prior to the acquisition of the assets of Siemens Health Services, Inc. by Cerner HS in 2015. In September 2017, the court issued a preliminary injunction to prevent NextGen from refusing to honor certain contractual obligations to support Cerner HS's clients who use NextGen ambulatory EHR solutions. In September 2018, NextGen filed a counterclaim alleging breach of contract and tortious interference but did not specify its damages. In August 2019, NextGen provided an expert report alleging profit disgorgement damages of $135 million or, alternatively, $30.5 million in lost profit damages, but the report did not discuss how our actions allegedly caused NextGen's damages. In December 2019, we deposed NextGen's expert, gaining additional clarity on categories of alleged damages but not on the alleged theories of liability. A jury trial is set to begin on January 25, 2021. We believe NextGen's claims are without merit and will vigorously defend against them; however, there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the dispute. We have not concluded that a loss related to the claims raised by NextGen in its counterclaim is probable, nor have we accrued a liability related to these claims. Although a loss may be reasonably possible (as defined in ASC 450), we do not have sufficient information to determine the amount or range of reasonably possible loss in light of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of litigation generally, the wide range of damages presented by NextGen's expert, and the continued lack of clarity on the causal connection between Cerner Corporation's and Cerner HS's actions and any alleged damages.

The terms of our agreements with our clients generally provide for limited indemnification of such clients against losses, expenses and liabilities arising from third party or other claims based on, among other things, alleged infringement by our solutions of an intellectual property right of third parties or damages caused by data privacy breaches or system interruptions. The terms of such indemnification often limit the scope of and remedies for such indemnification obligations and generally include, as applicable, a right to replace or modify an infringing solution. For several reasons, including the lack of a sufficient number of prior indemnification claims relating to IP infringement, data privacy breaches or system interruptions, the inherent uncertainty stemming from such claims, and the lack of a monetary liability limit for such claims under the terms of the corresponding agreements with our clients, we cannot determine the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, related to such indemnification provisions.
In addition to commitments and obligations in the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, including for example, employment and client disputes and litigation alleging solution and implementation defects, personal injury, intellectual property infringement, violations of law, breaches of contract and warranties, and compliance audits by various government agencies. Many of these proceedings are at preliminary stages and many seek an indeterminate amount of damages. At this time, we do not believe the range of potential losses under any claims to be material to our consolidated financial statements.