XML 51 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities  
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Note 12.  Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

 

The table below presents certain of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value during 2014, categorized by the level of inputs used in the valuation of each asset and liability:

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value at Reporting Date Using

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices in

 

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Active Markets for

 

Significant Other

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

Observable Inputs

 

Inputs

 

Description

 

Total

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recurring Fair Value Measurements:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effective portion of interest rate swap contracts(1)

 

$

(10,706

)

$

 

$

(10,706

)

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Properties held for sale(2)

 

$

213,244

 

$

 

$

 

$

213,244

 

 

(1)         The fair value of our interest rate swap contracts is determined using the net discounted cash flows of the expected cash flows of each derivative based on the market based interest rate curve (level 2 inputs) and adjusted for our credit spread and the actual and estimated credit spreads of the counterparties (level 3 inputs).  Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and the counterparties.  As of March 31, 2014, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives.  As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified as level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy.

(2)         As of March 31, 2014, we recorded a loss on asset impairment totaling $288 for one of our CBD properties (two buildings) and 13 of our suburban properties (41 buildings) to reduce the aggregate carrying value of these properties from $213,532 to their estimated fair value of $218,000, reflected in the table below, or $213,244 net of costs to sell.  All of these properties were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013.  We used current contracted sale prices (level 3 inputs) in determining the fair value of these properties.  The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used for our level 3 fair value measurements at March 31, 2014 were as follows:

 

Description

 

Fair Value at
March 31,
2014

 

Primary
Valuation
Techniques

 

Unobservable
Inputs

 

Range
(Weighted
Average)

 

Properties held for sale on which we recognized impairment losses

 

$

218,000

 

Current Contracted Sale Prices

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 

We are exposed to certain risks relating to our ongoing business operations, including the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.  The only risk we currently manage by using derivative instruments is a part of our interest rate risk.  Although we have not done so as of March 31, 2014, and have no present intention to do so, we may manage our Australian currency exchange exposure by borrowing in Australian dollars or using derivative instruments in the future, depending on the relative significance of our business activities in Australia at that time.  We have interest rate swap agreements to manage our interest rate risk exposure on $172,822 of mortgage debt due 2019, which require interest at a premium over LIBOR.  The interest rate swap agreements utilized by us qualify as cash flow hedges and effectively modify our exposure to interest rate risk by converting our floating interest rate debt to a fixed interest rate basis for this loan through December 1, 2016, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense.  These agreements involve the receipt of floating interest rate amounts in exchange for fixed rate interest payments over the life of the agreements without an exchange of the underlying principal amount.  The fair value of our derivative instruments increased by $1,000 and $1,051 during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, based primarily on changes in market interest rates.  As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the fair value of these derivative instruments included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and cumulative other comprehensive loss in our condensed consolidated balance sheets totaled ($10,706) and ($11,706), respectively. We may enter additional interest rate swaps or hedge agreements to manage some of our additional interest rate risk associated with our floating rate borrowings.  The table below presents the effects of our interest rate derivatives on our condensed consolidated statements of operations and condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

(11,706

)

$

(16,624

)

Amount of loss recognized in cumulative other comprehensive income

 

(229

)

(185

)

Amount of loss reclassified from cumulative other comprehensive income into interest expense

 

1,229

 

1,236

 

Unrealized gain on derivative instruments

 

1,000

 

1,051

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

(10,706

)

$

(15,573

)

 

Over the next 12 months, we estimate that approximately $4,916 will be reclassified from cumulative other comprehensive income as an increase to interest expense.

 

In addition to the assets and liabilities described in the above table, our financial instruments include our cash and cash equivalents, rents receivable, investment in direct financing lease receivable, real estate mortgages receivable, restricted cash, revolving credit facility, senior notes and mortgage notes payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, rent collected in advance, security deposits and amounts due to related persons.  At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the fair values of these additional financial instruments, excluding mortgage debt related to properties held for sale, were not materially different from their carrying values, except as follows:

 

 

 

March 31, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

 

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Senior notes and mortgage notes payable

 

$

2,082,117

 

$

2,174,291

 

$

2,097,164

 

$

2,143,834

 

 

The fair values of our senior notes and mortgage notes payable are based on estimates using discounted cash flow analyses and currently prevailing interest rates adjusted by credit risk spreads (level 3 inputs).

 

Other financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of rents receivable; however, as of March 31, 2014, no single tenant of ours is responsible for more than 3% of our total annualized rents.

 

Our derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, are entered with major financial institutions and we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one counterparty.