Basis of Presentation Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2013

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Accounting, Policy

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial reporting, the instructions to Form 10-Q, and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these interim condensed consolidated financial statements contain all of the normal recurring accruals and adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited results for the quarters and nine months ended September 28, 2013 and September 29, 2012. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2013 (“Annual Report”).

Reclassification, Policy

Certain items previously reported in specific financial statement captions have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2013 presentation.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (“ASU 2013-11”). ASU 2013-11 eliminates diversity in practice in the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits. ASU 2013-11 requires an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented as a reduction to the related deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward, unless a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the governing tax law to settle taxes that would result from the disallowance of the tax position, or the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for such purpose. ASU 2013-11 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company does not believe that the adoption of the provisions of ASU 2013-11 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2013-02”). ASU 2013-02 requires the disclosure of additional information about reclassification adjustments, including (1) changes in accumulated other comprehensive income balances by component and (2) significant items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Required disclosures include disaggregation of the total change of each component of other comprehensive income and the separate presentation of reclassification adjustments and current-period other comprehensive income. In addition, ASU 2013-02 requires the presentation of information about significant items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or as a separate disclosure in the notes to the financial statements. The new disclosure requirements are effective, prospectively, for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. ASU 2013-02 concerns presentation and disclosure only. Adoption of the provisions of ASU 2013-02 at the beginning of 2013 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”). ASU 2012-02 permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If an entity determines that it is not more likely than not that the asset is impaired, the entity will have the option not to calculate annually the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of the provisions of ASU 2012-02 at the beginning of 2013 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.