10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the quarterly period ended September 29, 2006.

Or

¨ Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from              to             .

Commission File Number 1-10441

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	94-2789662
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1200 Crittenden Lane, Mountain View, California 94043-1351

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(650) 960-1980

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨                Accelerated filer  x                Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.    Yes  x    No  ¨

As of October 27, 2006, there were 11,125,000 shares of Successor Company Common Stock, par value $0.01, outstanding.

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited):
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	30
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	50
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	50
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	51
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	51
Item 5.	Other Information	51
Item 6.	Exhibits	51
Signatures		52

Trademarks used in this Form 10-Q: Silicon Graphics, Altix, Origin, Onyx, IRIX, Silicon Graphics Fuel, SGI, and Tezro are registered trademarks, and Silicon Graphics Prism is a trademark of Silicon Graphics, Inc. in the U.S. and/or other countries worldwide. MIPS is a registered trademark of MIPS Technologies, Inc. used under license by Silicon Graphics, Inc. UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group in the U.S. and other countries. Intel, Itanium and Xeon are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the U.S. and other countries. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in several countries. Red Hat and all Red Hat-based trademarks are trademarks or registered trademarks of Red Hat, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners.

2

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts, unaudited)

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 29, 2006			Sept. 30, 2005
Revenue:
Product and other revenue	$	45,229		$	73,788
Product revenue from related party		15,377			16,826
Service revenue		61,199			70,125
Total revenue		121,805			160,739
Costs and expenses:
Cost of product and other revenue		42,710			62,550
Cost of service revenue		32,265			38,172
Research and development		16,007			23,365
Selling, general, and administrative		42,359			59,865
Other operating expenses, net (1)		3,926			7,185
Total costs and expenses		137,267			191,137
Operating loss		(15,462	)		(30,398	)
Interest expense (contractual interest of $7,841 for the first quarter of fiscal 2007)		(7,688	)		(3,475	)
Interest and other income (expense), net (2)		11,286			(361	)
Income (loss) from equity investment		105			(1,468	)
Loss before reorganization items and income taxes		(11,759	)		(35,702	)
Reorganization items, net		340,397			—
Income (loss) before income taxes		328,638			(35,702	)
Income tax provision		2,382			497
Net income (loss)	$	326,256		$	(36,199	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	1.20		$	(0.14	)
Diluted	$	0.77		$	(0.14	)
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share:
Basic		271,563			267,036
Diluted		423,875			267,036

(1) Represents estimated restructuring costs in each of the three month periods ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005.

(2) The three-month period ended September 29, 2006 includes a pre-tax gain of approximately $10 million on the sale of a portion of our investment in SGI Japan. See Note 14.

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

	Successor Company		Predecessor Company
	September 29, 2006		June 30, 2006
	(unaudited)		(1)
Assets:
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (2)	$	82,698	$	54,673
Short-term marketable investments		266		203
Short-term restricted investments		34,044		32,539
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,213 at September 29, 2006 and $3,117 at June 30, 2006		50,230		58,417
Inventories		83,100		49,997
Prepaid expenses		9,577		10,457
Other current assets		25,570		54,723
Total current assets		285,485		261,009
Restricted investments		16,188		15,959
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization at June 30, 2006		40,651		27,873
Goodwill		11,517		4,515
Other intangibles		88,300		—
Other non-current assets, net		75,972		70,702
	$	518,113	$	380,058
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit):
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	59,123	$	8,951
Accrued compensation		31,840		29,224
Income taxes payable		806		1,596
Other current liabilities		53,266		49,392
Current portion of long-term debt		716		103,124
Current portion of deferred revenue		55,230		124,379
Total current liabilities		200,981		316,666
Long-term debt		85,000		397
Non-current portion of deferred revenue		21,170		45,538
Other non-current liabilities		25,074		27,681
Total liabilities not subject to compromise		332,225		390,282
Liabilities subject to compromise		—		320,230
Total liabilities		332,225		710,512
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
New preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;		—		—
New common stock, $0.01 par value, and additional paid-in capital; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 11,125,000 shares issued and outstanding		185,888		—
Old common stock, $0.001 par value, and additional paid-in capital; 750,000,000 shares authorized; 274,887,761 and 274,247,196 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		—		1,564,504
Accumulated deficit		—		(1,868,201	)
Treasury stock		—		(6,760	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		—		(19,997	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		185,888		(330,454	)
	$	518,113	$	380,058

(1) The condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2006 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

(2) The cash and cash equivalents balance as of the September 29, 2006 Fresh Start date includes the financing and equity Plan effects which resulted in net cash inflows of $29 million. The payment of approximately $48 million in Plan related obligations that were paid beginning on Oct. 17, 2006, and will continue on negotiated payment terms through the third quarter of fiscal 2007, have not been deducted from this cash balance. In addition, at emergence we had $30 million of capacity available under the exit financing revolver. We plan to utilize up to the full availability under the revolver to fund intraquarter cash needs starting in the second quarter of fiscal 2007.

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands, unaudited)

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 29, 2006			Sept. 30, 2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	326,256		$	(36,199	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Effect of plan of reorganization and revaluation of assets and liabilities		(342,996	)		—
Depreciation and amortization		10,202			13,536
Amortization of premium and discount on long-term debt, net		—			(994	)
Gain on sale of equity investment		(9,848	)		—
Share-based compensation expense		122			982
Other		(1,474	)		(575	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		8,187			23,486
Inventories		(13,639	)		6,325
Accounts payable		6,361			(5,145	)
Accrued compensation		2,616			(3,716	)
Deferred revenue		(18,189	)		5,581
Other assets and liabilities		2,621			8,615
Total adjustments		(356,037	)		48,095
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(29,781	)		11,896
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of marketable investments		(61	)		(82	)
Proceeds from the maturities of marketable investments		—			—
Restricted investments:
Purchases		(6,686	)		(3,830	)
Maturities		5,580			3,284
Proceeds from sale of equity investment		18,690			—
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,064	)		(1,320	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		16,459			(1,948	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments of debt principal		(130,007	)		(167	)
Proceeds from debtors-in-possession financing		29,825			—
Proceeds from exit financing		85,000			—
Net proceeds from financing arrangements		—			1,324
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		56,529			1,811
Net cash provided by financing activities		41,347			2,968
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		28,025			12,916
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		54,673			64,247
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	82,698		$	77,163

See accompanying notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Description of Business

Silicon Graphics, Inc. is a leading provider of products, services, and solutions for use in high-performance computing and storage. We sell highly scalable servers, storage solutions, and associated software products that enable our customers in the scientific, technical and business communities to solve their most challenging problems and that provide them with strategic and competitive advantages. Whether analyzing images to aid in brain surgery, studying global climate changes, accelerating the engineering of new automotive designs, providing technologies for homeland security, or gaining business “intelligence” from mining a company’s databases, our systems are designed to compute vast amounts of data, translate data into high-resolution images in a realistic time-frame and scale, and provide high-speed storage. We also offer a range of services and solutions, including professional services, customer support, and education. These products and services are used in a range of industries including defense and intelligence, sciences, engineering analysis, and enterprise data management.

Silicon Graphics, Inc.’s emergence from proceedings under chapter 11 of Title 11 (“Chapter 11”) of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) on October 17, 2006 (as described in Note 2 below) resulted in a new reporting entity and adoption of fresh-start accounting in accordance with Statement of Position SOP 90-7, Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code (“SOP 90-7”), as of September 29, 2006. Under the provisions of fresh-start accounting, a new entity has been deemed created for financial reporting purposes. References to “Successor Company” or “we” in the Financial Statements and the notes thereto refer to Silicon Graphics, Inc. on and after September 29, 2006, after giving effect to the provisions of Silicon Graphics, Inc.’s Plan of Reorganization and the application of fresh-start accounting. References to “Predecessor Company” in the Financial Statements and notes thereto refer to Silicon Graphics, Inc. prior to September 29, 2006. For further information on fresh-start accounting see Note 4.

2. Proceedings Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code

Chapter 11 Reorganization

On May 8, 2006 (the “Petition Date”), the Predecessor Company and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”), filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the "Court") (Case Nos. 06-10977BRL through 06-10990BRL) (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). The Predecessor Company filed jointly with the following direct and indirect subsidiaries: Silicon Graphics Federal, Inc., Cray Research, LLC, Silicon Graphics Real Estate, Inc., Silicon Graphics World Trade Corporation, Silicon Studio, Inc., Cray Research America Latina Ltd., Cray Research Eastern Europe Ltd., Cray Research India Ltd., Cray Research International, Inc., Cray Financial Corporation, Cray Asia Pacific, Inc., ParaGraph International, Inc., and WTI-Development, Inc. Certain subsidiaries of the Predecessor Company consisting principally of international subsidiaries, were not debtors (collectively, the "Non-Debtors") in this bankruptcy proceeding. The Debtors remained in possession of their assets and properties as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Court and in accordance with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In general, as debtors-in-possession, each of the Debtors was authorized to continue to operate as an ongoing business, but was not allowed to engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the Court.

The Predecessor Company sought and obtained Court approval through its “first day” and subsequent motions to pay certain foreign vendors, meet its pre- and post-petition payroll obligations, maintain its cash management systems, pay its taxes, continue to provide employee benefits, honor certain pre-petition customer programs, and maintain its insurance programs. In addition, the Court approved certain trading notification and transfer procedures designed to allow restrictions in the trading of its common stock (and related securities) which could have negatively impacted its accrued net operating losses and other tax attributes.

On May 10, 2006, the Predecessor Company, Silicon Graphics Federal, Inc. and Silicon Graphics World Trade

6

Corporation (collectively, the “Borrowers”) entered into a Post-Petition Loan and Security Agreement (the “Interim DIP Agreement”) dated as of May 8, 2006 with Quadrangle Master Funding Ltd., Watershed Technology Holdings, LLC and Encore Fund, L.P. (collectively, the “Interim DIP Lenders”). The Interim DIP Agreement provided $70 million of debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) financing (the “$70 million DIP Financing”) to the Borrowers secured by certain of the borrowers’ assets. The interest rate under the Interim DIP Agreement was the per annum rate equal to the greater of (i) the rate of interest published in the Wall Street Journal from time to time as the “Prime Rate” plus seven percentage points or (ii) 250 basis points higher than the rate at which cash interest was then payable under the Company’s pre-petition credit agreement, provided that upon an event of default, the then current interest rate under the Interim DIP Agreement would be increased by two percentage points.

On May 26, 2006, the Predecessor Company reached a settlement with its landlord to restructure its lease obligations at Amphitheatre Technology Center (“ATC”) and Crittenden Technology Center (“CTC”) and received Court approval of the settlement on June 15, 2006. This settlement terminated the Predecessor Company’s lease obligations at ATC and terminated its lease obligations for two buildings at CTC as of June 30, 2006. It also amended the lease obligations for a third building at CTC. Pursuant to the settlement, the Predecessor Company vacated the two buildings at CTC by June 30, 2006 and we plan to vacate the third building by December 31, 2006.

In June 2006, the Debtors entered into a replacement Post-Petition Loan and Security Agreement (the “DIP Agreement”) with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., (the “Administrative Agent”), Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., the Interim DIP Lenders and certain other lenders party thereto (collectively, the “DIP Lenders”), providing up to $130 million of debtor-in-possession financing (the “$130 million DIP Financing”). The Post-Petition Loan and Security Agreement was approved by the Court on June 26, 2006. The Order approving the Post-Petition Loan and Security Agreement (i) authorized the Debtors to incur post-petition secured indebtedness in the amount of up to $130 million while granting to the Administrative Agent and lenders thereunder, subject to specified “permitted” prior liens, and a “carve-out” for specified professional fees and other costs and expenses, superpriority administrative expense claims and first priority priming liens against, and security interests in, substantially all of the Debtors’ then-owned and after-acquired property, (ii) authorized the Debtors to repay amounts owed under their pre-petition credit agreement, which was repaid on June 28, 2006, (iii) authorized the Debtors to repay amounts borrowed under the Interim DIP Agreement, and (iv) authorized the Debtors’ use of cash collateral of their secured notes and granted to the secured noteholders certain adequate protection of their interests therein.

At a hearing held on July 27, 2006, the Court approved the Predecessor Company’s Disclosure Statement, ruling that it contained adequate information for soliciting creditor approval of the Predecessor Company’s Plan of Reorganization. At a hearing held on September 19, 2006, the Court confirmed the Predecessor Company’s Plan of Reorganization, as amended (the “Plan”). This Confirmation Order became a Final Order on September 29, 2006 and we emerged from Chapter 11 on October 17, 2006.

Subject to certain exceptions in the Bankruptcy Code, the Chapter 11 filings automatically stayed the initiation or continuation of most actions against the Debtors, including most actions to collect pre-petition indebtedness or to exercise control over the property of the bankruptcy estates. As a result, absent an order of the Court, creditors were precluded from collecting pre-petition debts and substantially all pre-petition liabilities were subject to compromise under the Plan.

Under the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors also had the right to assume, assume and assign, or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases, subject to the approval of the Court and certain other conditions. Generally, the assumption of an executory contract or unexpired lease requires a debtor to cure certain existing defaults under the

7

contract, including the payment of all or a portion of the accrued but unpaid pre-petition liabilities. Rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease is typically treated as a breach of the contract or lease, immediately prior to the Chapter 11 filing. Subject to certain exceptions, this rejection relieves the debtor from performing its future obligations under that contract but entitles the counterparty to assert a pre-petition general unsecured claim for damages. Parties to executory contracts or unexpired leases rejected by a debtor were able to file proofs of claim against that debtor’s estate for damages.

Emergence from Chapter 11

After satisfying all conditions precedent to emergence under the Plan, we emerged from Chapter 11 effective as of October 17, 2006 (“Emergence Date”). On the Emergence Date, we entered into a credit agreement with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc and General Electric Capital Corporation to provide exit liquidity financing as part of our plan to emerge from bankruptcy. The exit financing facility provides up to $115 million of financing consisting of an $85 million term loan from Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and a $30 million line of credit from General Electric Capital Corporation. The new facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Successor Company and its domestic subsidiaries and has customary terms and conditions, including covenants related to minimum levels of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) and minimum levels of cash and cash equivalents, and limits on capital expenditures. This facility, combined with net proceeds of $57 million from the Rights Offering and sale of Overallotment shares described below were used to pay off $113 million due under our existing DIP Agreement, to fund payments, including closing costs and related fees, required to be made on the Emergence Date pursuant to the Plan, and to provide working capital for our ongoing operations. The exit financing facility matures in October 2011.

On the Emergence Date, we received $50 million in gross proceeds from the offering of common stock subscription rights to the holders of the Predecessor Company’s 6.50% Senior Secured Convertible Note claims, 11.75% Senior Secured Note claims and the Cray 6.125% Convertible Subordinated Debenture claims (the “Rights Offering”), guaranteed by a backstop agreement (“Backstop Purchase Agreement”) put in place with certain of these holders (the “Backstop Purchasers”). In consideration for the Backstop Purchase Agreement, the Backstop Purchasers were paid a fee and were offered subscription rights to purchase the Overallotment shares, which upon exercise provided an incremental $7.5 million.

As of the Emergence Date, the authorized capital stock of the reorganized company consists of 25,000,000 shares of new common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. Pursuant to the Plan, we issued 11,125,000 shares of new common stock to certain of the Predecessor Company’s creditors in satisfaction of claims and upon exercise of stock purchase rights and overallotment options. Of the 11,125,000 shares of outstanding new common stock, 10,000,000 shares were issued and distributed to holders of Allowed Secured Note Claims and Allowed Cray Unsecured Debenture Claims and 1,125,000 shares were issued and distributed as Overallotment shares to the Backstop Purchasers pursuant to the Backstop Purchase Agreements. In addition, 1,250,000 shares of the new common stock have been reserved for issuance pursuant to the terms of the New Management Incentive Plan in accordance with the Plan. No shares of preferred stock are outstanding.

As of the Emergence Date, Dr. Edelheit, Dr. White, Mr. Muller and Mr. Bishop ceased being directors of the Company and the following persons became members of the Board of Directors pursuant to and by operation of the Plan: Eugene I. Davis, Anthony Grillo, Kevin D. Katari, and Chun Won Yi. Mr. McKenna and Mr. McDivitt remain as directors of the Successor Company. On October 18, 2006, Mr. Katari was elected as Chairman of the Board.

Effective October 23, 2006, our new common stock trades on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol SGIC.

Reorganization items

Reorganization Items, Net. Reorganization items, net represents expense or income amounts incurred as a direct result of the Company’s Chapter 11 filing and are presented separately in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Such items consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 29, 2006
Professional fees	$	8,942
Gains on settlements with creditors		(6,343	)
Effects of the plan of reorganization		(142,033	)
Fresh-start valuation of assets and liabilities		(200,963	)
	$	(340,397	)

Included in the effects of the Plan is a charge of $4 million for the acceleration of stock-based compensation resulting from the cancellation of Predecessor Company stock options and restricted stock awards.

8

Liabilities Subject to Compromise

Liabilities subject to compromise represent the liabilities of the Debtors incurred prior to the Petition Date, except those that will not be impaired under the Plan. Liabilities subject to compromise consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Predecessor Company
	September 29, 2006			June 30, 2006
6.50% Senior Secured Convertible Notes due June 1, 2009	$	188,578		$	188,578
6.125% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due February 1, 2011		56,776			56,776
11.75% Senior Secured Notes due June 1, 2009		2,386			2,386
Accounts payable		47,082			55,447
Accrued liabilities		16,248			17,043
Liabilities subject to compromise	$	311,070		$	320,230
Application of fresh-start reporting (Note 4)		(311,070	)
Liabilities subject to compromise (Successor Company)	$	—

During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Predecessor Company adjusted its liabilities subject to compromise prior to the adoption of fresh-start accounting for activity that included settlements with creditors, revisions to liabilities based on estimated allowed claims and recording additional liabilities recognized under the Plan.

3. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern, which assumes continuity of operations and realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be required should we be unable to continue to operate as a going concern. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly- and majority-owned subsidiaries (both Debtor and Non-Debtor). The unaudited results of operations for the interim periods shown herein are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire fiscal year. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for all periods presented have been made. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. During the first three months of fiscal 2007, our accounting calendar had 13 weeks compared with 14 weeks during the first three months of fiscal 2006.

Our ability to continue as a going-concern is dependent upon, among other things, (i) our ability to successfully achieve required cost savings to complete our restructuring; (ii) our ability to maintain adequate cash on hand; (iii) our ability to generate cash from operations; (iv) our ability to implement our revenue stabilization initiatives; and (v) our ability to achieve profitability. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully achieve these objectives in order to continue as a going-concern. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should we be unable to continue as a going-concern.

The preparation of interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. On an on-going basis, we evaluate these estimates, including those related to customer programs and incentives; bad debts; inventory; lease residual values; warranty obligations; restructuring; incomes taxes and contingencies, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates.

9

For the period subsequent to the Petition Date and prior to emergence, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Statement of Position 90-7, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code” (“SOP 90-7”). Accordingly, as of June 30, 2006, all pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise have been segregated in the consolidated balance sheet and classified as liabilities subject to compromise at the estimated amounts of allowable claims. Interest has not been accrued on debt subject to compromise subsequent to the Petition Date. Reorganization items include the expenses, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses resulting from the reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code, and are reported separately as reorganization items in the Predecessor Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

Fresh-Start Reporting

Although the Company emerged from bankruptcy on October 17, 2006, the Predecessor Company adopted “fresh-start” reporting as of September 29, 2006 in accordance with SOP 90-7. Fresh-start reporting was required because holders of existing voting shares immediately before filing and confirmation of the plan received less than 50% of the voting shares of the emerging entity and its reorganization value was less than its post petition liabilities and allowed claims. Fresh-start required the Successor Company to allocate its reorganization value to its assets and liabilities in a manner similar to that which is required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Under the provisions of fresh-start accounting, a new entity has been deemed created for financial reporting purposes. References to “Successor Company” or “we” in the Financial Statements and the notes thereto refer to the Company on and after September 29, 2006, after giving effect to the provisions of the Plan and the application of fresh-start accounting. References to “Predecessor Company” in the Financial Statements and notes thereto refer to the Company prior to September 29, 2006. Accordingly, our financial information disclosed under the heading “Successor Company” as of September 29, 2006 is presented on a basis different from, and is therefore not comparable to, our financial information disclosed under the heading “Predecessor Company” as of June 30, 2006. For further information on fresh-start accounting see Note 4.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 29, 2006 gives effect to adjustments to the carrying value of assets or amounts and classifications of liabilities that were necessary when adopting fresh-start reporting. The statements of operations and cash flows for the three-month period ended September 29, 2006 reflect the operations of the Predecessor Company, which includes the gain from the discharge of debt and the application of fresh-start reporting. The adoption of fresh-start reporting had a material effect on the consolidated financial statements as of September 29, 2006 and will have a material impact on consolidated statements of operations for periods subsequent to September 29, 2006.

In addition, the Successor Company was required to adopt changes in accounting principles that will be required in the consolidated financial statements of the Successor Company within the twelve months following the adoption of fresh-start reporting. As a result of this requirement, we early adopted SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, EITF Issue No. 06-2, “Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43, Accounting for Compensated Absences” (or “EITF 06-2”), and EITF Issue No. 06-3, How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation). The Successor Company is still in the process of completing its review of these accounting pronouncements for impact on its consolidated results of operations. The early adoption of EITF 06-2 resulted in a $2.8 million increase in our liability for sabbatical leave and was included as part of the fresh-start valuation adjustments.

4. Fresh-Start Reporting

On September 19, 2006, the Bankruptcy Court entered its Confirmation Order confirming the Plan. Our emergence from Chapter 11 proceedings on the Emergence Date resulted in a new reporting entity and adoption of fresh-start accounting in accordance with SOP 90-7 as of September 29, 2006, as reflected in the following financial information. Reorganization adjustments have been made in the financial information to reflect the discharge of certain pre-petition liabilities and the adoption of fresh-start accounting.

Estimated reorganization adjustments result primarily from the:

i. changes in the carrying values of assets and liabilities to reflect fair values including the establishment of certain intangible assets;

10

ii. discharge of the Company’s pre-petition liabilities in accordance with the Plan;

iii. addition of new financing;

iv. cash distributions paid or payable to pre-petition creditors; and

v. issuance of Successor Company Common Stock and cancellation of old common stock.

We engaged an independent financial advisor to assist in the determination of our reorganization value as defined in SOP 90-7. In June 2006, we determined a reorganization value, together with the financial advisor, using various valuation methods including: (i) publicly traded company analysis, (ii) discounted cash flow analysis and (iii) precedent transactions analysis. These analyses are necessarily based on a variety of estimates and assumptions which, though considered reasonable by management, may not be realized and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Changes in these estimates and assumptions may have a significant effect on the determination of our reorganization value. The assumptions used in the calculations for the discounted cash flow analysis regarding projected revenue, costs, and cash flows, for fiscal 2007-2022 were provided by management based on our best estimate at the time the analysis was performed. Management’s estimates implicit in the cash flow analysis included increases in net revenue of 2.5% to 5.0% per year over the sixteen-year period. In addition, the analysis includes estimated cost reductions, primarily in selling, general and administrative costs through our plans for headcount reductions and other cost efficiencies. The analysis also includes anticipated levels of reinvestment in our operations through capital expenditures ranging from $12.0 million to $20.0 million per year. We did not include in our estimates the potential effects of litigation, either on the Company or the industry. The foregoing estimates and assumptions are inherently subject to uncertainties and contingencies beyond our control. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the estimates, assumptions, and values reflected in the valuations will be realized, and actual results could vary materially.

Our enterprise value was calculated to be within an approximate range of $210 million to $275 million. We selected the midpoint of the range, $242.5 million, to be used in the determination of reorganization value. On September 19, 2006 (the “Confirmation Date”), this value was confirmed by the Court and the Creditors Committee. The equity value of $185.9 million represents the reorganization value of $242.5 million reduced by $56.6 million representing the value of the new debt of $85 million and further adjusted primarily for estimated excess cash upon emergence and the issuance of 1,125,000 shares of common stock in accordance with the Backstop Purchase Agreements.

The fair value allocated to the assets and liabilities of the Company is in conformity with SFAS No. 141 Business Combinations (SFAS 141). These adjustments are based upon the work of management and their outside consultants to determine the relative fair values of our assets and liabilities. The allocation of the reorganization enterprise value to individual assets and liabilities may change based upon completion of the valuation process, as additional information becomes available, and may result in differences to the fresh-start adjustments presented in this financial information. In addition, the allocation of the reorganization enterprise value to individual assets and liabilities may also change based upon completion of our final assessment of the early adoption of accounting pronouncements. We expect to finalize this allocation no later than the end of the current fiscal year.

11

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (a)

(In thousands, unaudited)

	Predecessor Company									Successor Company
	Sept. 29, 2006			Plan Reorganization Adjustments			Preliminary Fresh-Start Valuation Adjustments			Sept. 29, 2006
Assets:
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	53,280		$	29,418	(b), (j)	$	—		$	82,698
Short-term marketable investments		266			—			—			266
Short-term restricted investments		34,044			—			—			34,044
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,213		50,230			—			—			50,230
Inventories		62,382			—			20,718	(g)		83,100
Prepaid expenses		10,577			(1,000	)(e)		—			9,577
Other current assets		42,550			—			(16,980	)(g)		25,570
Total current assets		253,329			28,418			3,738			285,485
Restricted investments		16,188			—			—			16,188
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization		25,818			—			14,833	(g)		40,651
Goodwill		4,515			—			7,002	(i)		11,517
Other Intangibles		—			—			88,300	(g)		88,300
Other non-current assets, net		62,809			2,255	(c)		10,908	(g)		75,972
Total assets	$	362,659		$	30,673		$	124,781		$	518,113
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		23,677			35,446	(d), (j)		—			59,123
Accrued compensation		31,840			—			—			31,840
Income taxes payable		806			—			—			806
Other current liabilities		47,969			2,505	(d), (j)		2,792	(g)		53,266
Current portion of long-term debt		114,179			(113,111	)(b), (f)		(352	)(g)		716
Current portion of deferred revenue		109,686			—			(54,456	)(g)		55,230
Total current liabilities		328,157			(75,160	)		(52,016	)		200,981
Long-term debt		139			85,000	(b)		(139	)(g)		85,000
Non-current portion of deferred revenue		42,043			—			(20,873	)(g)		21,170
Other non-current liabilities		28,227			—			(3,153	)(g)		25,074
Total liabilities not subject to compromise		398,566			9,840			(76,181	)		332,225
Liabilities subject to compromise		311,070			(311,070	)(d)		—			—
Total liabilities		709,636			(301,230	)		(76,181	)		332,225
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Common stock		1,564,627			183,110	(e)		(1,561,849	)(h)		185,888
Accumulated deficit		(1,884,941	)		142,033	(e)		1,742,909	(h)		—
Treasury stock		(6,760	)		6,760	(e)		—			—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(19,902	)		—			19,902	(h)		—
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(346,977	)		331,902			200,963			185,888
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	362,659		$	30,673		$	124,781		$	518,113

12

a. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet estimates the effect of implementing the Plan and fresh-start reporting which was adopted on September 29, 2006. Under fresh-start reporting, which is required by SOP 90-7, reorganization enterprise value of $242.5 million based on the Disclosure Statement, which, after reduction for the new debt and remaining non-Debtor interest bearing liabilities and the addition of the proceeds from the overallotment shares and excess borrowings, results in a reorganization equity value of $185.9 million.

b. Reflects repayment of the DIP facility of $113.1 million, proceeds from the new term loan of $85 million, the issuance of 7.5 million shares issued through the Rights Offering for $49 million, net of backstop and rights offering fees, and the issuance of 1.125 million overallotment shares for $7.5 million.

c. Reflects the capitalization of the exit financing fees associated with the acquisition of the new term loan of $85 million and the new working capital facility of $30 million. There were no borrowings against the working capital facility as of the Emergence Date.

d. Reflects the discharge of the Predecessor Company’s pre-petition liabilities in accordance with the Plan and the reclassification of remaining liabilities subject to compromise to the appropriate liability accounts in accordance with the Plan. No adjustments are reflected for the actual payments of these remaining liabilities subject to compromise. Discharge of the Predecessor Company’s pre-petition liabilities is summarized as follows (in thousands):

To be exchanged for stock	$	196,374
To be paid in cash		114,696
		$311,070

Additionally, in accordance with the Plan, under the Rights Offering, holders of the Cray Unsecured Notes received the right to purchase 700,000 shares of new Successor Company common stock for $6.67 per share, and holders of the Predecessor Company’s Senior Secured Notes and Senior Secured Convertible Notes received the right to purchase an additional 6.8 million shares of new Successor Company common stock for $6.67 per share. In addition, certain pre-petition creditors exercised an option to purchase an additional 1.125 million overallotment shares for $6.67 per share.

e. Reflects the issuance of new Successor Company common stock to pre-petition creditors, the cancellation of old common stock and treasury stock, and the gain on the discharge of liabilities subject to compromise, and the acceleration of stock-based compensation resulting from the cancellation of Predecessor Company stock options and restricted stock awards.

f. Reflects the repayment of the $113.1 million due under the $130 million DIP Facility.

g. Reflects changes to the carrying values of assets and liabilities to reflect fair values in accordance with SFAS No. 141. As well as the $2.8 million impact from the early adoption of EITF 06-02.

h. Reflects the elimination of historical accumulated deficit and other equity accounts and an adjustment to shareholder’s equity to result in the estimated reorganized equity value in accordance with SOP 90-7 (see note a above).

i. Reflects the elimination of historical goodwill and the recording of goodwill for the amount of reorganization value in excess of the amount allocable to specifically identifiable assets and liabilities.

j. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet does not give effect to cash payments estimated at $47.7 million to unsecured creditors and for taxes, interest and other costs pursuant to the Plan. Such amounts are included in current liabilities.

13

5. Stockholders’ Equity

Successor Company

The Plan became effective and we emerged from bankruptcy on October 17, 2006. We applied fresh-start reporting effective September 29, 2006 and, as a result, the Predecessor Company’s common stock was canceled as of the Emergence Date, with no distribution made to holders of such stock. The equity structure of the Successor Company as of September 29, 2006 is discussed below.

Successor Company Common Stock

On the Emergence Date, the Successor Company, a Delaware corporation, filed a new certificate of incorporation (“New Certificate”). The New Certificate authorized 25,000,000 shares of new Successor Company common stock (“common stock”) with $0.01 par value per share. Pursuant to the Plan, the Successor Company issued 11,125,000 shares of common stock to certain creditors in satisfaction of claims and upon exercise of stock purchase rights and overallotment options.

Successor Company Preferred Stock

The New Certificate authorized 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. Currently, no shares of preferred stock have been designated or issued.

Successor Company Management Incentive Plan

On the Emergence Date, the Silicon Graphics, Inc. Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”) became effective pursuant to the Plan. Under the MIP, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee is authorized to grant stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), stock awards, stock units, other stock based awards, dividend equivalents and cash awards. Employees, non-employee directors, and consultants of the Successor Company and its subsidiaries who are selected by the Committee are eligible to participate in the MIP. The MIP will terminate ten years after the Effective Date unless sooner terminated. The maximum number of shares of common stock of the Company issuable under the MIP is 1,250,000 shares. Of the shares reserved, only 312,500 may be issued for “full value benefits”. Full value benefits are stock awards designed to provide equity compensation based on the full value of a share of stock. The MIP also imposes per-participant award limits. Stock units are expected to have a vesting period of up to 36 months and stock options will vest up to 48 months. All grants under the MIP will be issued at fair value.

Shares are counted against the authorization only to the extent they are actually issued. Awards for shares which terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation, or otherwise, or are settled in cash in lieu of shares, shall result in shares being again available for grant. Also, if the exercise price or tax withholding requirements of any award are satisfied by tendering shares to the Successor Company, or if a stock appreciation right is exercised, only the number of shares issued, net of the shares tendered, will be deemed issued under the MIP. Each award agreement will specify the effect of a holder’s termination of employment with, or service for, the Successor Company, including the extent to which unvested portions of the award will be forfeited and the extent to which options, SARs, or other awards requiring exercise will remain exercisable. Such provisions will be determined in the Committee’s sole discretion. The Committee may at any time alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate the MIP or any outstanding award in whole or in part. As of September 29, 2006 and the date of this Form 10-Q, no grants had been made under the MIP.

Predecessor Company

The equity structure of the Predecessor Company prior to emergence from Chapter 11 is discussed below.

Common Stock

The Predecessor Company has authorized 750,000,000 shares of common stock $0.001 par value per share. At September 29, 2006, 274,887,761 and 274,247,196 shares were issued and outstanding, respectively. All Predecessor Company common stock was cancelled as of the Emergence Date in accordance with the Plan.

Share-based Compensation Plans

During the three-month periods ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, the Predecessor Company had three active share-based compensation plans, and two Board-approved share-based agreements, as described below.

14

The Predecessor Company’s accounting for stock-based compensation expense continued to be recorded in its results of operations during the Chapter 11 proceedings. All existing common stock, stock options, and restricted stock awards issued under these plans were cancelled on the Emergence Date in accordance with the Plan, and the prior equityholders received no recovery.

The Predecessor Company’s Amended and Restated 1993 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan (the “1993 Plan”) permitted the grant to its employees of up to 3,800,000 restricted shares of Predecessor Company common stock and up to 30,938,808 of share options on Predecessor Company common stock. The 1993 Plan also permitted the issuance of stock appreciation rights (“SARs”). Option awards were generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of Predecessor Company common stock at the date of grant; those awards generally vested based on four years of continuous service and had seven-year contractual terms. Restricted share awards generally vested in four annual installments.

The Predecessor Company’s Amended and Restated 1996 Supplemental Non-Executive Equity Incentive Plan (the “1996 Plan”) permitted the grant of shares of Predecessor Company common stock or equivalent instruments to its employees (which were subject to conditions and restrictions) and/or of share options on up to a total of 22,500,000 shares of Predecessor Company common stock. Option awards were generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of Predecessor Company common stock at the date of grant; those awards generally vested based on four years of continuous service and had seven-year contractual terms. Restricted share awards generally vested in four annual installments.

The Predecessor Company’s Amended and Restated 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) allowed eligible employees to purchase Predecessor Company stock through payroll deductions at 85% of the lower of the closing prices for the stock at the beginning or the end of the six-month purchase period. Purchases were limited to 10% of each employee's compensation and could not exceed an amount set by the Board of Directors. On January 26, 2006, the Board of Directors suspended new offering periods under the ESPP until otherwise determined by the Board.

On February 1, 2006, the Predecessor Company entered into an agreement to issue 5,368,044 non-qualified stock options to Dennis McKenna, President, Chief Executive Officer, and then Chairman of the Board. These options would have cliff vested 25% on February 1, 2007 and then in equal quarterly installments over the remaining 36 months. The exercise price was $0.35 per share and would have expired in seven years from the date of grant. The terms of this option were similar to the 1993 Plan described above. All 5,368,044 shares were cancelled upon emergence from bankruptcy on the Emergence Date in accordance with the Plan and he received no recovery.

On February 1, 2006, the Predecessor Company entered into an agreement to issue 2,684,022 shares of restricted common stock to Dennis McKenna, President, Chief Executive Officer, and then Chairman of the Board. Under the terms of this agreement, the shares would have vested and would have been non-forfeitable over a two-year period ending February 1, 2008. Three-eighths of the shares would have vested on December 31, 2006, with the remaining five-eighths to vest in quarterly installments beginning February 1, 2007. During the vesting period, ownership of the shares could not be transferred. The unvested shares had the same voting rights as other common stock and were considered to be issued and outstanding. All 2,684,022 shares were cancelled upon emergence from bankruptcy on the Emergence Date in accordance with the Plan and he received no recovery.

As a result of the cancellation of our Predecessor Company share-based compensation plans and Board approved share-based agreements upon emergence from Chapter 11, we accelerated approximately $4 million in unrecognized compensation expense as of September 29, 2006 related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements previously granted under our various plans. The charge was recorded as a reorganization item during the first quarter of fiscal 2007.

Determining Fair Value of Stock Options

The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton closed-form option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our stock. We use historical data to estimate the options’ expected term, which represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. For purposes of performing our valuation, we separated our employees into two groups, within which the employees have similar historical exercise behavior; the ranges given below result from certain groups of employees exhibiting different behavior. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

15

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 29, 2006	Sept. 30, 2005
Expected volatility	1.30	1.1
Expected term (in years)	2.55 –2.08	2.43 –5.84
Risk-free rate	4.77% – 4.80%	3.96% – 4.04%
Expected dividends	0%	0%

Stock Compensation Expense

We recorded approximately $0.1 million (excluding the expense related to the options cancellation) and $0.9 million of stock-based compensation during the three months ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively.

16

6. Other Operating Expenses, Net

Other operating expenses, net represents the costs associated with our restructuring plans. These actions, by plan, were as follows during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 (in thousands):

	Predecessor Company													Successor Company
	Balance at June 30, 2006		Costs Incurred		Adjust- ments			Non-cash Settlements and Other			Cash Payments			Balance at Sept. 29, 2006
Fiscal 2001 through 2005 plans:
Severance and related charges	$	158	$		$	(40	)	$			$	2		$	120
Vacated facilities		16		—		(1	)	$	—			(15	)		—
Fiscal 2006 plan 1:
Severance and related charges		511		—		5			—			(292	)		224
Vacated facilities		963		40		223			—			(115	)		1,111
		1,474		40		228			—			(407	)		1,335
Fiscal 2006 plan 2:
Severance and related charges		2,093		720		235			—			(1,173	)		1,875
Vacated facilities		107		11		—			—			(1	)		117
Other		—		—		(193	)		193			—			—
		2,200		731		42			193			(1,174	)		1,992
Fiscal 2006 plan 3:
Severance and related charges		2,083		3,322		(174	)		—			(3,044	)		2,187
Vacated facilities		751		—		(241	)		175			(424	)		261
Accelerated depreciation		—		19		—			(19	)		—			—
		2,834		3,341		(415	)		156			(3,468	)		2,448
All restructuring plans:
Severance and related charges		4,845		4,042		26			—			(4,507	)		4,406
Vacated facilities		1,837		51		(19	)		175			(555	)		1,489
Accelerated depreciation		—		19		—			(19	)		—			—
Other		—		—		(193	)		193			—			—
Total of all restructuring plans	$	6,682	$	4,112	$	(186	)	$	349		$	(5,062	)	$	5,895

During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Predecessor Company made $5 million in payments related to all of our restructuring plans and actions, $4 million of which was for severance and related charges and $1 million of which was for vacated facilities obligations, primarily rent. The Predecessor Company recognized costs of $4 million, of which $4 million was for severance and related charges. The Predecessor Company made minor adjustments to our estimates of severance and related costs, vacated facilities costs and operating asset write downs for fixed assets associated with the end of production of existing Prism and Prism Deskside products related to fiscal 2001, fiscal 2004, fiscal 2005, and fiscal 2006. These adjustments included a credit of $0.3 million for commissions expenses related to the settlement that terminated and amended the lease obligations at ATC and CTC in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, an increase in estimated costs of $0.2 million for a leased facility that the Predecessor Company vacated under the fiscal 2006 plan 1 due to a change in sublease assumptions and changes in estimated severance and related charges associated with the fiscal 2006 plans 2 and 3 for one of our international locations that had no net impact on restructuring expense.

The restructuring liability balance of $6 million at September 29, 2006 includes $4 million in severance

17

obligations and $2 million of facility-related liabilities. We expect to pay the majority of the accrued severance and related charges during the 12 months following September 29, 2006. The facility-related liabilities of $2 million represent $4 million in future non-cancelable rental payments due, less estimated sublease income of $2 million, $1 million of which is under contract, and less than $1 million in accretion expense that will be recognized through fiscal 2011. We expect to pay $1 million of facility-related charges during the 12 months following September 29, 2006, with the remainder of our restructuring obligations to be paid through fiscal 2011.

As of September 29, 2006, we have substantially completed the execution of our fiscal 2000 through fiscal 2005 restructuring plans, with the exception of certain severance obligations of our international subsidiaries.

In an effort to further reduce our operating expenses, the Predecessor Company implemented restructuring activities under the fiscal 2006 restructuring plans during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Under these restructuring plans, the Predecessor Company recognized costs of $4 million for the elimination of approximately 50 positions across all levels and functions. We expect to make the remaining payments related to these actions by approximately the end of fiscal 2007. Under the fiscal 2006 restructuring plans, the Predecessor Company also recorded charges of less than $0.1 million for accretion expense associated with a facility in Canada vacated in fiscal 2006, acceleration of depreciation associated with changes in the estimated useful lives of certain leasehold improvements associated with our U.S. corporate headquarters that we plan to vacate by December 31, 2006 and other lease termination costs.

The restructuring costs incurred during the three-month period ended September 29, 2006, the cumulative amount incurred through September 29, 2006, and the total amount expected to be incurred for each major type of cost associated with our restructuring plans accounted for in accordance with SFAS 88 Employers' Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits, SFAS 112 Employers' Accounting for Postemployment Benefits and SFAS 146 Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, (our fiscal 2004, fiscal 2005, and fiscal 2006 plans) were as follows (in thousands):

18

	Predecessor Company
	Products			Global Services			Total
Fiscal 2004 restructuring plan:
Costs incurred and adjustments during the three months ended September 29, 2006:
Vacated facilities	$	(4	)	$	(4	)	$	(8	)
Total	$	(4	)	$	(4	)	$	(8	)
Cumulative costs incurred as of September 29, 2006:
Severance and related charges	$	10,648		$	8,444		$	19,092
Canceled contracts		366			275			641
Vacated facilities		6,727			(2,127	)		4,600
Other		3,119			2,471			5,590
Accelerated Depreciation		1,714			1,348			3,062
Total	$	22,574		$	10,411		$	32,985
Fiscal 2005 restructuring plan:
Costs incurred and adjustments during the three months ended September 29, 2006:
Severance and related charges	$	(20	)	$	(20	)	$	(40	)
Total	$	(20	)	$	(20	)	$	(40	)
Cumulative costs incurred as of September 29, 2006:
Severance and related charges	$	5,636		$	4,331		$	9,967
Vacated facilities		3,398			1,313			4,711
Total	$	9,034		$	5,644		$	14,678
Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan 1:
Costs incurred and adjustments during the three months ended September 29, 2006:
Severance and related charges	$	3		$	3		$	6
Vacated facilities		130			133			263
Total	$	133		$	136		$	269
Cumulative costs incurred as of September 29, 2006:
Severance and related charges	$	5,172		$	4,784		$	9,956
Vacated facilities		(1,509	)		(2,305	)		(3,814	)
Accelerated depreciation		2,400			2,662			5,062
Total	$	6,063		$	5,141		$	11,204
Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan 2:
Costs incurred during the three months ended September 29, 2006:
Severance and related charges	$	472		$	483		$	935
Vacated facilities		5			6			11
Other		(95	)		(98	)		(193	)
Total	$	382		$	391		$	773
Cumulative costs incurred as of September 29, 2006:
Severance and related charges	$	3,911		$	5,059		$	8,970
Canceled contracts		43			55			98
Vacated facilities		175			229			404
Other		683			927			1,610
Total	$	4,812		$	6,270		$	11,082

19

	Predecessor Company
	Products			Global Services			Total
Fiscal 2006 restructuring plan 3:
Costs incurred during the three months ended September 29, 2006:
Severance and related charges	$	1,557		$	1,591		$	3,148
Vacated facilities		(120	)		(121	)		(241	)
Accelerated depreciation		9			10			19
Total	$	1,446		$	1,480		$	2,926
Cumulative costs incurred as of September 29, 2006:
Severance and related charges	$	2,449		$	2,853		$	5,302
Vacated facilities		8,902			12,643			21,545
Accelerated depreciation		1,844			2,607			4,451
Total	$	13,195		$	18,103		$	31,298

7. Inventories

Inventories were as follows (in thousands):

	Successor Company		Predecessor Company
	Sept. 29, 2006		June 30, 2006
Components and subassemblies	$	14,486	$	22,308
Work-in-process		35,007		17,187
Finished goods		27,559		3,783
Demonstration systems		6,048		6,719
Total inventories	$	83,100	$	49,997

Pursuant to fresh start accounting, in the Company’s opening September 29, 2006 balance sheet, inventory amounts were stated at fair market value. Components and subassemblies were not adjusted as the carrying value reflected fair value. Finished goods and work-in-process inventories were recorded at selling price less cost to sell, cost to complete and a reasonable apportionment of the profit margin associated with the selling and the post emergence completion effort. As reported in Note 4, this resulted in increased inventories by approximately $20.7 million. The amount of cost of goods sold to be recognized by the Successor Company will be higher than the amount historically recognized by the Predecessor Company

8. Other Current Assets

Other current assets were as follows (in thousands):

	Successor Company		Predecessor Company
	Sept. 29, 2006		June 30, 2006
Deferred cost of goods sold	$	4,782	$	29,081
Value-added tax receivable		5,281		7,569
Other		15,507		18,073
Total other current assets	$	25,570	$	54,723

9. Restricted Investments

Restricted investments consist of short- and long-term investments held under a security agreement (see Note 13) or pledged as collateral against letters of credit. The majority of our restricted investments is currently pledged as collateral against letters of credit and are primarily associated with two specific customer arrangements for significant multi-year contracts with long-term delivery and installation commitments. Restricted investments pledged as collateral are held in our name by various financial institutions.

20

10. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment were as follows (in thousands):

	Successor		Predecessor
	Company		Company
	Sept. 29, 2006		June 30, 2006
Property and equipment, at cost	$	40,651	$	339,655
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		—		(311,781	)
Property and equipment, net	$	40,651	$	27,873

Pursuant to fresh-start accounting, as more fully discussed in Note 4, the Company adjusted its property, plant and equipment to its fair value as adjusted for the allocation of the reorganization value and reset accumulated depreciation to zero. As reported in Note 4, this resulted in a net increase in property, plant and equipment of $14.8 million. The amount of depreciation to be recognized by the Successor Company will be higher than the amount historically recognized by the Predecessor Company.

11. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill was established in connection with our adoption of fresh-start accounting (see Note 4). The Company is currently assessing the allocation of the Goodwill between reportable segments.

Other Intangible Assets

Other Intangible Assets were established in connection with our adoption of fresh-start accounting (see Note 4). Other Intangible Assets consist of the following (in thousands):

	Successor Company
	Sept. 29, 2006
Developed product technology	$	29,200
In-process research and development		500
Customer backlog		2,900
Royalty license agreements		2,800
Trademark/trade name portfolio		6,400
Customer relationships		46,500
Total intangible assets	$	88,300

We are currently in the process of determining the amortization periods for the categories of the above intangibles which will range for periods of up to 15 years. Also, in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 4 Applicability of FASB Statement No. 2 to Business Combinations Accounted for by the Purchase Method, in-process research and development will be expensed by the Successor Company in the period beginning September 30, 2006.

12. Other Non-Current Assets

Other non-current assets were as follows (in thousands):

	Successor		Predecessor
	Company		Company
	Sept. 29, 2006		June 30, 2006
Spare parts	$	19,737	$	19,876
Equity investment		20,869		18,604
Other		35,366		32,222
Total other non-current assets	$	75,972	$	70,702

21

13. Debt and Other Financing Arrangements

Debt that was not subject to compromise consisted of the following at September 29, 2006 and June 30, 2006 (in thousands):

	Successor Company			Predecessor Company
	Sept. 29, 2006			June 30, 2006
Term Loan due October 17, 2011	$	85,000		$	—
Debtor-in-Possession Financing due November 10, 2006		—			100,000
Other		716			3,521
		85,716			103,521
Less amounts due within one year		(716	)		(103,124	)
Amounts due after one year	$	85,000		$	397

Exit Financing

On the Emergence Date, the Successor Company entered into a credit agreement with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc and General Electric Capital Corporation to provide exit liquidity financing as part of our plan to emerge from bankruptcy. The exit financing facility provides up to $115 million of financing consisting of an $85 million term loan from Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and a $30 million line of credit from General Electric Capital Corporation. The term loan bears interest payable monthly at the LIBOR rate plus 7.00%. The revolving line of credit bears interest payable monthly at the LIBOR rate plus 3.00%. No amount was drawn against the $30 million line of credit at emergence, however we plan to utilize up to the full availability under the revolver to fund intra-quarter cash needs starting in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. The new facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Successor Company and its domestic subsidiaries and has customary terms and conditions, including covenants related to minimum levels of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) and minimum levels of cash and cash equivalents, and limits on capital expenditures. This facility, combined with net proceeds of $57 million from the Rights Offering and sale of Overallotment shares, was used to pay off $113 million due under the existing $130 million DIP Agreement, to fund payments, including closing costs and related fees, required to be made on the Emergence Date pursuant to the Plan, and provide working capital for our ongoing operations. The exit financing facility matures in October 2011. Annual principal payments, over the next five years are as follows (in millions): fiscal 2007 — $10; fiscal 2008 — $10; fiscal 2009 — $13; fiscal 2010 — $17; fiscal 2011 — $17 and $38 thereafter.

DIP Financing

In June 2006, the Debtors entered into the DIP Agreement with the DIP Lenders, providing up to $130 million of debtor-in-possession financing, which consists of a $100 million term loan and a $30 million revolving line of credit. The DIP Agreement is secured by certain assets of the Borrowers. This DIP Agreement was approved by the Court on June 26, 2006. The Order approving the DIP Agreement (i) authorized the Debtors to incur post-petition secured indebtedness in the amount of $130 million while granting to the Administrative Agent and lenders thereunder, subject to specified “permitted” prior liens, and a “carve-out” for specified professional fees and other costs and expenses, super priority administrative expense claims and first priority priming liens against, and security interests in, substantially all of the Debtors’ then-owned and after-acquired property, (ii) authorized the Debtors to repay amounts owed under their pre-petition credit agreement, which was repaid on June 28, 2006, (iii) authorized the Debtors to repay amounts borrowed under the Interim DIP Agreement, and (iv) authorized the Debtors’ use of cash collateral of their secured notes and granted to the secured noteholders certain adequate protection of their interests therein. We borrowed $113 million against this facility. The DIP Agreement terminates and all outstanding borrowed amounts under the DIP Agreement become due on the earliest to occur of (i) the date a plan of reorganization confirmed under Chapter 11 becomes effective, (ii) the date on which an event of default occurs and is continuing, (iii) the date of any decision by the board of

22

directors of any Borrower to proceed with the sale or liquidation of any Borrower without the consent of all of the Lenders, (iv) November 10, 2006, and (v) the date the Borrowers pay all of the required DIP Lenders in full and terminate the term loan under the DIP Agreement, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the DIP Agreement. On the Effective Date, all amounts due under the DIP Agreement were repaid and the agreement was terminated in accordance with its terms.

Other Long-term Debt

Other long-term debt at September 29, 2006 includes a $0.7 million loan secured by a receivable. The loan bears interest at a fixed annual rate of 5.22% and is repayable in quarterly installments ending in fiscal 2008.

14. Sale of Interest in SGI Japan

In August 2006, the Predecessor Company completed the sale of a portion of its equity investment in SGI Japan to SGI Japan, Ltd. The Predecessor Company received cash proceeds of approximately $17 million, net of withholding taxes, and recorded a net gain of approximately $8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. As a result of the sale, our ownership interest was reduced to approximately 10%. See Note 19 for further information on our related party relationship with SGI Japan.

15. Guarantees

Financial Guarantees

Financial guarantees include contracts that contingently require us to make payments to the beneficiary of the guarantee based on changes in an underlying variable (for example, a specified interest rate, security price, or other variable) that is related to an asset, liability, or equity security of the guaranteed party. Currently, we have issued financial guarantees to cover rent on leased facilities and equipment, in favor of government authorities and certain other parties to cover liabilities associated with the importation of goods and to support payments in advance of future delivery on our goods and services. The majority of our financial guarantees have terms of one year or less. Our maximum potential obligation under financial guarantees at September 29, 2006 was $51 million for which we had $48 million of assets held as collateral.

Assets held as collateral closely approximate fair value. At September 29, 2006, we did not have any obligations associated with our guarantees that met the criteria to be recorded as liabilities on our condensed consolidated statement of financial position.

Product warranty

At the time of sale of our products, we provide for an estimated cost to warrant these products against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of up to one year on UNIX® and Linux® systems and up to three years on storage systems. Product warranty activity was as follows (in thousands):

	Successor Company			Predecessor Company
	Sept. 29, 2006			Sept. 30, 2005
Product warranty beginning balance	$	5,481		$	6,442
New warranties issued		1,195			2,117
Warranties paid		(1,735	)		(2,214	)
Changes in warranty rate estimates		1			(186	)
Product warranty ending balance	$	4,942		$	6,159

23

16. Earnings (loss) Per Share

Set forth below is a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 29, 2006		Sept. 30, 2005
Net income (loss)	$	326,256	$	(36,199	)
Effect of dilutive securities:
6.50% Senior Secured Convertible Notes		—		—
6.125% Convertible Subordinated Debentures		—		—
Adjusted net income (loss)	$	326,256	$	(36,199	)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic		271,563		267,036
6.50% Senior Secured Convertible Notes		150,862		—
6.125% Convertible Subordinated Debentures		1,450		—
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted		423,875		267,036
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	1.20		(0.14	)
Diluted	$	0.77		(0.14	)
Potentially dilutive weighted securities excluded from computations because they are anti-dilutive		26,344		154,295

Potentially dilutive weighted securities include the assumed exercise of stock options and the assumed vesting of restricted stock awards as well as the assumed conversion of debt using the if-converted method.

This information will not be comparable to earnings per share information reported by the Successor Company because all existing equity interests were eliminated (without a distribution) upon the consummation of the Plan.

17. Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, were as follows (in thousands):

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 29, 2006		Sept. 30, 2005
Net income (loss)	$	326,256	$	(36,199	)
Change in net unrealized loss on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges		—		(1,611	)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss) adjustments		95		(424	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	326,351	$	(38,234	)

18. Segment Information

We have two reportable segments, Products and Global Services. Our reportable segments are determined after assessment of factors such as quantitative thresholds of business components to be included into reportable segments, customer base, economic characteristics, homogeneity of products, technology, delivery channels, and other factors, and are aligned with the process by which executive management makes operating decisions and evaluates performance.

Products

Our Products segment is comprised of our Core Systems based on the Intel^® Itanium^® 2 microprocessor and Linux^® operating system as well as our storage solutions and our Legacy Systems based on the MIPS^® RISC microprocessor and IRIX^® operating system including the remarketed versions of these workstations, graphics systems, high-performance servers and storage solutions. Our Products are distributed through our direct sales force and through indirect channels, including resellers, distributors, and systems integrators.

Our Core Systems are comprised of our high-performance servers and visualization systems based on Intel Itanium 2 and Xeon microprocessors and the Linux operating system and storage solutions. Our Core Systems include the SGI^® Altix^® family of high-performance servers, the SGI^® Altix^® XE family of cluster products and the SGI^® InfiniteStorage line of storage solutions. The Altix family are high-performance supercomputing systems designed for technical computing applications, and they are also used as storage management servers for managing very large data

24

repositories that contain critical information and media servers for broadcast television applications. The Altix XE servers deliver superior performance in an ultra-dense low-power package, ideally suited for configuring clusters with optimal price-performance and low total cost of ownership. The InfiniteStorage line is a line of scalable, high-performance storage solutions built specifically for data-intensive workflow management, faster cycle times, and higher levels of access, availability and security. Within the InfiniteStorage line, we offer a broad range of disks and disk subsystems, ranging from entry-level disk arrays to complex enterprise-class storage systems, in either direct- or fabric-attached configurations.

Our Legacy Systems are comprised of our high-performance servers and visualization systems based on MIPS RISC microprocessors and the IRIX operating system. Our Legacy Systems include the SGI^® Origin^® family of high-performance servers. These are high-performance supercomputing systems designed for technical computing applications, and they are also used as storage management servers for managing very large data repositories that contain critical information and media servers for broadcast television applications. Our Legacy Systems also include the Silicon Graphics^® Tezro^® and Silicon Graphics Fuel^® workstations and the SGI^® Onyx^® family of graphics systems. These workstations are used in a variety of applications, including computer-aided design, medical imaging, 2D and 3D animation, broadcast, modeling, and simulation. Our graphics systems integrate high-performance computing, data management, and high-performance visualization into a single system. Our Legacy Systems also include the remarketed versions of the MIPS/IRIX-based workstations, graphics systems and high-performance servers as well as remarketed versions of our storage solutions.

Global Services

Our Global Services segment supports our computer hardware and software products and provides professional services to help customers realize the full value of their information technology investments. Our professional services organization provides technology consulting, education, managed services, and third-party products.

25

Revenue from external customers for similar classes of products and services was as follows (in thousands):

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 29, 2006		Sept. 30, 2005
Core Systems:
Computer systems products	$	34,476	$	53,993
Data management products		12,750		13,816
Total Core Systems		47,226		67,809
Legacy Systems:
Computer systems products		12,324		20,913
Data management products		618		1,816
Total Legacy Systems		12,942		22,729
Total Products revenue	$	60,168	$	90,538
Support services	$	48,834	$	57,175
Professional services and solutions		12,803		13,026
Total Global Services revenue	$	61,637	$	70,201

Segment Results

We evaluate our segments based on the direct revenues, costs of sale and expenses that we can directly attribute to those segments. We do not routinely manage our business by identifying or allocating assets, corporate administrative costs, or depreciation by operating segment, nor do we evaluate segments on these criteria. On a quarterly basis, we utilize a robust set of assumptions to allocate indirect costs, which contribute to overall company profit and loss, to our segments. Operating segments do not sell products to each other, and accordingly, there is no inter-segment revenue to be reported.

Operating results for our reportable segments were as follows (in thousands):

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 29, 2006			Sept. 30, 2005
Revenue from external customers:
Products	$	60,168		$	90,538
Global services		61,637			70,201
Total consolidated	$	121,805		$	160,739
Operating Income (loss):
Products	$	(23,448	)	$	(31,654	)
Global services		11,912			8,440
Total reportable segments		(11,536	)		(23,214	)
Restructuring		(3,926	)		(7,185	)
Total consolidated	$	(15,462	)	$	(30,399	)

19. Related Party Transactions

Our proportionate share of SGI Japan's financial results is included as a component of Interest and Other Income (Expense), net in accordance with APB 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock. We record revenue for products sold to SGI Japan when evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed and determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured as prescribed by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. (SAB) 104, Revenue Recognition. However, because of our related party relationship with SGI Japan, we reduce our proportionate

26

share of their financial results for any SGI product sold to SGI Japan that has not been sold through to their customers, by the amount of profit on those transactions. Due to the timing of receipt of financial reporting information from SGI Japan, these entries are recorded on a one-quarter lag, unless the amount of profit on product not yet sold through to SGI Japan’s customers during the quarter is materially different from previous quarters. When materially different, we reduce our proportionate share of SGI Japan’s financial results by the amount of the profit on those specific transactions in the current quarter.

Revenue and standard cost of revenue associated with sales to SGI Japan were as follows (in thousands):

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 29, 2006		Sept. 30, 2005
Product revenue	$	15,377	$	16,826
Standard cost of product revenue	$	9,233	$	10,873

Aggregate amounts receivable from and amounts payable to SGI Japan were immaterial at September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005.

In August 2006, the Predecessor Company completed the sale of a portion of its equity investment in SGI Japan to SGI Japan, Ltd. The Predecessor Company received cash proceeds of approximately $17 million, net of withholding taxes, and recorded a net gain of approximately $8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. As a result of the sale, our ownership interest was reduced to approximately 10%. Due to the decline in our ownership percentage, we will account for this investment under the cost method of accounting in accordance with APB 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, effective for our second quarter of fiscal 2007.

20. Contingencies

We may, from time to time, be involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies," we record a provision for a liability when management believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and we can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. We believe we have adequate provisions for any such matters. We review these provisions at least quarterly and adjust these provisions to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular case.

Our U.S. income tax returns for fiscal years 2003 to 2005 are open, and to date, we have not been notified of any pending audits or of any proposed adjustments to those returns. We are also negotiating the settlement of tax issues relating to our investment in Cray Research that affect the years 1984 through 1988. The current settlement proposals may result in a significant tax credit. We are currently being audited for state sales and use tax matters for the years 2000 through 2006 in California and for property taxes in the County of Santa Clara, California for the years 2003 through 2006. In addition, we have open income tax, VAT, and sales tax audits for years 1995 through 2005 in various foreign jurisdictions. The most significant of these audits surrounds proposed adjustments we made in April 2005 to our prior year Canadian federal tax returns for fiscal years 1996 through 2004. The adjustments are currently being reviewed by the Canadian Revenue Authorities and if accepted, will result in a significant tax credit. Our tax reserves associated with these historic Canadian federal tax returns have been prepared on the basis of issued assessments for fiscal years 1996 through 2002 and submitted tax returns for fiscal years 2003 and 2004. The outcome of any tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty, but we believe that any resulting audit adjustments to any of our open tax returns will not result in a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

As described in Note 1, on the Petition Date, May 8, 2006, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11. As of the Petition Date, most pending litigation (including some of the actions described below) is stayed, and absent further order of the Court, no party, subject to certain exceptions, may take any action, again subject to certain exceptions, to recover on pre-petition claims against us. On the Emergence Date, we emerged from Chapter 11.

27

SCO Group, the successor to AT&T as the owner of certain UNIX system V intellectual property and as our licensor, has publicly claimed that certain elements of the Linux operating system infringe SCO Group’s intellectual property rights. In August 2003, the Predecessor Company received a letter from SCO Group alleging that, as a result of its activities related to the Linux operating system, it was in breach of the fully paid license under which we distribute our IRIX operating system. The letter purported to terminate our UNIX System V license effective October 14, 2003. We have not received any communication from SCO with regard to this purported termination since that time. We believe that the SCO Group’s allegations are without merit and that our fully paid license is non-terminable. There can be no assurance that this dispute with SCO Group will not escalate into litigation, which could have a material adverse effect upon SGI, or that SCO Group’s intellectual property claims, which include a widely publicized litigation against IBM Corporation, will not impair market acceptance of the Linux operating system.

On August 10, 2005, our German subsidiary, which was not a party to the Chapter 11 Cases, filed a lawsuit with the LG Munich, a Higher Regional Court in Germany, against T-Systems International GmbH (“TSI”), a systems integrator, relating to a dispute regarding whether acceptance criteria were met with regard to an SGI system delivered in the spring of 2003. We are seeking full payment for the system in an amount equal to €4.6 million ($5.8 million based on the conversion rate as of September 29, 2006). On September 21, 2005, TSI filed a counterclaim contesting our claim and alleging damages of €9 million plus interest since April 2004 ($11.4 million based on the conversion rate as of September 29, 2006), which exceeds our contractual limit of liability of €2 million ($2.5 million based on the conversion rate as of September 29, 2006). On December 7, 2005, we responded to TSI’s counterclaim and filed a motion seeking an additional €3.8 million ($4.8 million based on the conversion rate as of September 29, 2006) for lost profit relating to maintenance services. We cannot currently predict the outcome of this dispute.

On July 29, 2005, Syntegra (USA), Inc., a computer repair services vendor, filed a complaint against the Predecessor Company in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, in connection with the Predecessor Company’s termination of its contract with Syntegra and transition of its business to an alternate vendor alleging, among other things, breach of contract, unfair competition and misappropriation of trade secrets. This complaint was dismissed from the federal court as improperly filed and on September 20, 2005, Syntegra re-filed a substantively similar complaint in the Superior Court of California, Santa Clara County. On November 7, 2005, the Predecessor Company filed its answer to Syntegra’s complaint and, additionally, filed a cross complaint against Syntegra for, among other things, declaratory relief and breach of contract. We are in discussions regarding a potential settlement that would fully resolve this claim by providing for an allowed general unsecured claim in the bankruptcy.

On August 3, 2006, LG Electronics, Inc. (“LGE”) filed a motion (the “LGE Motion”) in the Chapter 11 Cases of the Debtors seeking relief from the automatic stay pursuant to section 362(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code so that LGE may proceed with certain patent infringement claims against the Company in the appropriate district court and seek damages for alleged pre- and post-petition infringements of certain of LGE’s patents. The LGE Motion also requests that the Court determine that the automatic stay does not apply to LGE’s ability to commence a proceeding against the Company in respect of the Company’s alleged continuing, post-petition infringement of LGE’s patents. LGE also filed proofs of claims in the Chapter 11 Cases against each of the Debtors in connection with the alleged patent infringement. On August 25, 2006, the Debtors objected to LGE's proofs of claims. The Debtors and LGE resolved the LGE Motion by stipulation dated September 8, 2006, and entered by the Court on September 8, 2006. In the stipulation, LGE agreed to withdraw the LGE Motion, agreed not to file any objection to confirmation of the Debtors' Plan, and agreed to withdraw all proofs of claim asserting pre-petition infringement except the one filed against SGI. The Debtors agreed that LGE claims alleging patent infringement first arising after the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases could be adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction other than the Court after confirmation of the Plan. On September 26, 2006, the Predecessor Company filed a motion to estimate the LGE claims at $0.00 for purposes of allowance and distribution under the Plan. On October 24, 2006, we reached an agreement in principle with LGE to settle its pre-petition claim. Under that agreement, LGE will receive an allowed general unsecured claim payable from funds set aside for the satisfaction of pre-petition claims under the Plan. The precise amount of LGE’s allowed claim has not yet been determined. The agreement is subject to negotiation and execution of a mutually-acceptable settlement agreement, which the parties anticipate completing by the end of November 2006. The settlement is without prejudice to the parties’ claims and defenses regarding LGE’s allegations of post-petition infringement.

28

The Predecessor Company first learned of LGE’s claims in December 2000 when it received a letter stating LGE’s belief that the Company was infringing eight patents owned by LGE. During the past several years, the parties have exchanged correspondence and held numerous meetings in an effort to resolve the claims. Although LGE has made a demand for a monetary settlement to its claims, no formal action was filed prior to bankruptcy. LGE is currently in the process of litigating similar patent claims with several other system manufacturers and has indicated to the Company that it is reserving all rights concerning its claims pending the resolution of that litigation. Until the LGE Motion, the Predecessor Company had not received any further correspondence from LGE since an April 5, 2004 letter indicating that the lawsuits against the other companies were still pending and that LGE would continue licensing discussions at any time.

We do not believe LGE’s claims of post-petition patent infringement are meritorious and intend to oppose them. On September 28, 2006, we filed a lawsuit against LGE in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California seeking a declaratory judgment that we do not infringe LGE’s patents.

On October 23, 2006, we filed a patent infringement lawsuit against ATI Technologies Inc. in U.S. District Court — Western District of Wisconsin. In our complaint, we assert that products in ATI's line of Radeon^® graphics processors infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,650,327. The Complaint seeks unspecified damages and a Court Ordered injunction against future infringement by ATI.

As a result of anonymous allegations and allegations by an ex-employee we conducted an internal investigation into whether certain systems were delivered to an entity in China in possible violation of U.S. export laws. We have voluntarily shared information with respect to the investigation with the U.S. Department of Commerce. We cannot assure that the Department or other agencies of the US government will not institute any proceedings against the Company in the future. In addition, from time to time, we receive inquiries from regulatory agencies informally requesting information or documentation. There can be no assurance in any given case that such informal review will not lead to further proceedings involving the Company in the future.

We also routinely receive communications from third parties asserting patent or other rights covering our products and technologies. Based upon our evaluation, we may take no action or we may seek to obtain a license. We are in discussions with several parties that have asserted intellectual property infringement claims. There can be no assurance in any given case that a license will be available on terms we consider reasonable, or that litigation will not ensue.

On April 27, 2004, the Predecessor Company received a letter from counsel for Patriot Scientific Corporation listing six patents purportedly owned by Patriot concerning various microprocessor technologies. The letter did not name any specific products of the Predecessor Company but noted that Patriot had commenced litigation against six companies in two separate litigations, including Intel. On September 23, 2005, the Predecessor Company received a follow up letter from Alliacense, which purported to be a successor entity to Patriot. The September 2005 letter stated that Alliacense had reached agreement with several companies, including Intel and AMD, for licenses to the subject patents. The letter did not identify any specific products of the Predecessor Company that Alliacense believed to infringe any of the subject patents; however, the letter states Alliacense's belief that “virtually every product manufactured today utilizing microprocessors or embedded microprocessors" will require a portfolio license from Alliacense. We believe that Alliancense's assertions are without merit.

We are not aware of any pending disputes, including those disputes and settlements described above, that would be likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties and costs, including costs of litigation, and unfavorable outcomes could occur. An unfavorable outcome could include the payment of monetary damages, cash or other settlement, or an injunction prohibiting us from selling one or more products. If an unfavorable resolution were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows of the period in which the resolution occurs or on future periods.

29

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements regarding our business, objectives, financial condition, and future performance that involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements relating to the following: expected levels of revenue, gross margin, operating expense, future profitability, our expectations for new product introductions and market conditions, our assessment of the adequacy of our liquidity and capital resources, our belief regarding capital levels required for fiscal 2007, headcount reductions, and the expected impact on our business of restructuring actions, legal proceedings, and government actions. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations about future events. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential”, or “continue” or the negative of such terms or other similar terms. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Factors that might cause such a difference in results include, but are not limited to: our ability to implement business strategies and restructuring plans; our ability to maintain adequate liquidity; our ability to obtain and maintain normal terms with customers, suppliers and service providers; our ability to continue as a going concern; our ability to operate pursuant to the terms, including the covenants, of our credit agreement; our ability to maintain contracts that are critical to our operation; risks associated with the volatility of our stock price; risks associated with the timely development, production and acceptance of new products and services; increased competition; dependence on third party partners and suppliers; the failure to achieve expected product mix and revenue levels; failure to manage costs and generate improved operating results and cash flows; failure to maintain compliance with debt covenants; and failure to maintain adequate cash resources for the operation of the business. Additional risks and uncertainties include the following: risks related to liquidity and the adequacy of our capital resources; risks related to our ability to achieve profitable operations or limit losses; risks related to the impact on our business of the restructuring effected in fiscal 2006 with continuing effect in fiscal 2007; changes in customer order patterns; the impact of employee attrition and our ability to hire certain key professionals and executives in areas such as sales, marketing, finance, engineering and product management in order to execute our business strategies; adverse changes in general economic or business conditions; possible disruption if there is a loss of key personnel or executives; adverse changes in the markets for our products, including expected rates of growth and decline in our current markets; heightened competition, reflecting rapid technological advances and constantly improving price/performance, which may result in significant discounting and lower gross profit margins; continued success in technological advancements and the acceptance of new product introductions; risks related to dependence on our partners and suppliers; risks related to foreign operations (including weak or disrupted economies, unfavorable currency movements, and export compliance issues); risks associated with intellectual property disputes and other claims and litigation; and other factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed below under the heading “Risks That Affect Our Business”.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. All information presented herein is based on our fiscal calendar. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether changes occur as a result of new information, future events, changed assumptions, or otherwise.

Silicon Graphics, Inc.’s emergence from Chapter 11 proceedings on October 17, 2006 (as described below) resulted in a new reporting entity and adoption of fresh-start accounting in accordance with SOP 90-7 as of September 29, 2006. Under the provisions of fresh-start accounting, a new entity has been deemed created for financial reporting purposes. References to “Successor Company” or “we” in the following discussion refer to Silicon Graphics, Inc. on and after September 29, 2006, after giving effect to the provisions of Silicon Graphics, Inc.’s Plan of Reorganization and the application of fresh-start accounting. References to “Predecessor Company” in the Financial Statements and notes thereto refer to Silicon Graphics, Inc. prior to September 29, 2006. For further information on the Chapter 11 proceedings and fresh-start accounting, see Note 2 and Note 4, respectively, to our Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

Chapter 11 Reorganization

On May 8, 2006, the Predecessor Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11. For further information regarding these petitions, see Note 2 to our Notes to the Condensed Consolidated

30

Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q . On September 19, 2006, the Court entered its Confirmation Order confirming the Plan and we emerged from Chapter 11 on the Emergence Date. Under the Plan, all of the Predecessor Company’s existing common stock, stock options and restricted stock awards was cancelled upon emergence and the equityholders received no recovery. Accordingly, the Predecessor Company’s common stock has no value. Our emergence from Chapter 11 proceedings on the Emergence Date resulted in a new reporting entity and adoption of fresh-start accounting in accordance with SOP 90-7 as of September 29, 2006. As required by fresh-start accounting, our assets and liabilities have been preliminarily adjusted to fair value, and certain assets and liabilities not previously recognized in the Predecessor Company's financial statements have been recognized under fresh-start accounting. The condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2006 do not give effect to any adjustments in the carrying values of assets or liabilities that were recorded upon implementation of the Plan and the adoption of fresh-start accounting on September 29, 2006. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations from and after September 29, 2006 are not comparable to the financial condition and results of operations reflected in the historical consolidated financial statements of the Predecessor Company. In addition, the adoption of fresh-start accounting will have a significant non-cash impact on our future results of operations, but will have no impact on the underlying cash, working capital assumptions or the underlying operation of the business.

Overview

We are a leading provider of products, services, and solutions for use in high-performance computing and storage. We sell highly scalable servers, storage solutions, and associated software products that enable our customers in the scientific, technical and business communities to solve their most challenging problems and that provide them with strategic and competitive advantages. Whether analyzing images to aid in brain surgery, studying global climate changes, accelerating the engineering of new automotive designs, providing technologies for homeland security, or gaining business “intelligence” insights from mining a company’s massive databases, SGI’s systems are designed to compute vast amounts of data, translate data into high-resolution images in a realistic timeframe and scale, and provide high-speed storage. We also offer a range of services and solutions, including professional services, customer support, and education. These products and services are used in a range of industries including defense and intelligence, sciences, engineering analysis, and enterprise data management.

Business Strategy

For more than 20 years, our systems have enabled discovery, innovation and information transformation for scientists, engineers and creative professionals who benefit from systems engineered to meet their specific needs. We are taking the knowledge that we have gained in our traditional markets, coupled with the services our customers rely on and are making that more broadly available across our customers’ organization or enterprise. The unique shared-memory architecture of our server product line enables enterprise customers dealing with bigger data sets to access, analyze and transform their data to improve their decision-making and their overall competitive advantage. Furthermore, we have expanded our product line to include servers with Intel Xeon processors and clusters. Our strategy, to incorporate leading-edge technology in point-solutions that target specific workflow requirements and package the technology in a unified solution, enables all customers to efficiently deploy a “blended” server solution to support multi-workflow requirements.

This strategy requires that we maintain industry leadership with our products and services and provide highly differentiated solutions to our customers. Accordingly, the core elements of our strategy are as follows:

• Leading-Edge Innovation. Being at the forefront of high-performance computing, data management and services is core to our strategy, and accordingly we invest significantly in product development. We have introduced many important innovations to the world, including the first scalable NUMA (“Non-Uniform Memory Access”) system and work that led to the first storage area networks. Recent innovations in interoperability have brought us a range of product lines that operate well together in customer environments, enabling us to solve a broader range of customer problems.

31

• Support of Industry Standards. We are committed to the support of open standards for core elements of our new generation products, while focusing our proprietary component technology development to areas that deliver differentiated features and performance. Commitment to an open system platform is important for several reasons. First, it enables our customers to benefit from the superior price performance of today’s best-of-breed components, such as commodity DRAMs and the Intel Itanium and Xeon families of processors. Second, it enables SGI to leverage the research and development of Intel and the Linux community and therefore to focus our resources on systems architecture, storage management and solution delivery, all of which we believe is differentiated in important respects in the marketplace. Third, our support of industry standards, such as the Linux operating system, enables SGI to assimilate easily into standards-based IT environments.

• Direct Engagement with Our Customers. SGI benefits greatly from its close association with its customers, who are often among the leading experts in their fields. We maintain a program of regular contact and technical discourse with our customers. In addition to sponsoring many industry conferences and forums around the world, our engineers and executives meet regularly with the SGI User Group, an independent entity whose membership includes elite users of our solutions. This direct interaction between the leading edge of the computing world and SGI has influenced our architectural approach, and we consider this close association to be a core part of our ongoing strategy.

• Market Focus. Leveraging our strengths in scalable high-performance computing, data management and deep domain expertise, we are developing solutions that map to customers’ enterprise and workflow environments. We have also aligned our marketing resources to address specific market needs and drive innovation to benefit our target markets.

• Investing in ISV and Reseller Relationships. We depend on a strong ecosystem of software, hardware and partners. We are investing in a worldwide global developer program for independent software vendors, including porting and benchmarking support, direct interaction with our engineering staff, and sales and marketing resources. We understand that our success depends on theirs. We also engage in a variety of programs with OEM and reselling partners, who bring our technologies to a variety of customers not serviced directly by us. Investment in developing reseller channels and in software application partners joint marketing continues to be a key strategy for us, as it supports our ability to deliver a complete market-driven solution.

Results of Operations

The financial information and the discussion below should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto. During the first three months of fiscal 2007, the Predecessor Company’s accounting calendar had 13 weeks compared with 14 weeks during the first three months of fiscal 2006.

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 29, 2006			Sept. 30, 2005
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts; numbers may not add due to rounding)
Total revenue	$	122		$	161
Cost of revenue		75			101
Gross profit		47			60
Gross profit margin		38.4	%		37.3	%
Total operating expenses		62			90
Operating loss		(15	)		(30	)
Interest and other income (expense), net		3			(5	)
Loss before reorganization items and income taxes		(12	)		(36	)
Reorganization items, net		340			—
Income (loss) before income taxes		328			(36	)
Net income (loss)	$	326		$	(36	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	1.20		$	(0.14	)
Diluted	$	0.77		$	(0.14	)

32

Revenue

The following discussion of revenue is based on the results of our reportable segments as described in Note 18 to our Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Total revenue is principally derived from two reportable segments, Products and Global Services. Our Products segment is comprised of our Core Systems, representing our high-performance servers and other products based on Intel Itanium 2 and Xeon microprocessors and the Linux operating system, and storage solutions, and our Legacy Systems, representing our high-performance servers and visualization systems based on MIPS RISC microprocessors and the IRIX operating system.

Revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased $39 million or 24% compared with the corresponding period of fiscal 2006 reflecting declines in sales across all reportable segments and all geographies.

The following table presents total revenue by reportable segment (dollars in millions; numbers and percentages may not add due to rounding):

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 29, 2006			Sept. 30, 2005
Core Systems	$	47		$	68
Legacy Systems		13			23
Total Products	$	60		$	91
% of total revenue		49	%		56	%
Global Services	$	62		$	70
% of total revenue		51	%		44	%

Products. Revenue from our Products segment for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased $31 million or 34% compared with the corresponding period in fiscal 2006. The overall decline in product revenue was primarily attributable to a smaller number of large dollar transactions, especially in the Altix family of servers, an overall decline in volume and the cancellation of our Prism and Prism Deskside products in August 2006.

Revenue from Core Systems for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased $21 million or 31% compared with the corresponding period in fiscal 2006. The decline in Core Systems revenue is primarily a result of fewer large dollar transactions for Altix servers for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 compared with the corresponding period of fiscal 2006, coupled with the overall decline in our business over the past year leading up to our Chapter 11 filing, and the cancellation of our Prism and Prism Deskside products in August 2006. Despite reduced sales volumes, storage system revenue remained relatively constant for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 compared with the corresponding period in fiscal 2006, primarily due to an increase in average selling prices.

Revenue from Legacy Systems for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased $10 million or 43% compared with the corresponding period in fiscal 2006 principally due to the continuing long-term decline in the overall UNIX workstation market, an industry-wide trend that we expect will continue as lower-cost personal computers continue to gain market share. The decline in revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 compared with the corresponding period in fiscal 2006 is primarily a result of reduced volumes of both our Fuel and Tezro visual workstations. The decline in both our MIPS/IRIX-based servers and graphics systems revenue was principally due to reduced volumes due to customers transitioning away from the legacy system technology into Linux based systems. Revenue from our remarketed products for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased compared with the corresponding periods in fiscal 2006 primarily due to a decrease in sales of our remarketed MIPS/IRIX-based server systems, compounded by the impact on our European remanufactured products business due to the implementation of RoHS requirements as of July 2006.

33

Global Services. Revenue from our Global Services segment is comprised of hardware and software support, maintenance and professional services. Professional services revenue includes revenue generated from the sale of third party products and our consulting and managed services.

Revenue from Global Services for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased $8 million or 11% compared with the corresponding period in 2006. The decline was primarily due to a reduction in our traditional customer support revenue resulting from lower pricing for new contracts compared with existing contracts, coupled with a decline in the overall installed base resulting from fewer contract renewals. To a lesser extent, a decline in revenue generated from professional services contracts also contributed to the overall decline in Global Services revenue.

34

Geographic Revenue. Total revenue by geographic area was as follows (dollars in millions):

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
Area	Sept. 29, 2006				Sept. 30, 2005
Americas	$	76	63	%	$	89	55	%
Europe		21	17	%		37	23	%
Rest of World		25	20	%		35	22	%
Total revenue	$	122			$	161

The shift in geographic revenue mix in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 compared with the corresponding period in fiscal 2006 is primarily the result of restructuring actions initiated in Europe causing short-term disruption in business operations and therefore lower revenue.

Backlog. Our consolidated backlog at September 29, 2006 was $113 million, up from $99 million at September 30, 2005. Backlog is comprised of committed purchase orders for products and professional services deliverable within nine months. Backlog increased within the Core Systems segment, specifically with regard to our Linux-based Altix servers and storage systems, offset in part by a decrease in professional services. Backlog decreased within the Legacy Systems segment, principally due to customers transitioning away from the legacy system technology into Linux based systems. Backlog increased primarily in Europe and slightly in Japan with slight decreases experienced in all other regions. The increase in backlog in Europe is primarily associated with significant orders from Leibniz Computing Center in Munich, Germany and the Technical University in Dresden, Germany.

We do not maintain sufficient backlog to meet our quarterly objectives for product revenue without obtaining significant new orders that are booked and shipped within the quarter. Our backlog reflects only orders for product and professional services for which a firm purchase order has been issued or a contract has been made, although orders in backlog are subject to customer cancellation or rescheduling in certain circumstances, and government customers typically have rights of cancellation for convenience. SGI systems have also been selected for a number of multi-year U.S. government programs, with expected purchases that are not reflected in our current backlog. In addition, we may enter into longer delivery-cycle contracts such as a current order from a European supercomputing center for which a portion of the value is not reflected in our current backlog. A portion of this order is currently scheduled to ship outside the time provided in our bookings policy and the contract is not expected to be recognized as revenue until fiscal 2008. These types of orders generally also require us and our partners to develop and deliver future products, and are subject to performance guarantees collateralized by letters of credit and additional penalties for delays in delivery or non-performance.

Gross Profit Margin

Cost of product and other revenue includes costs related to product shipments, including materials, labor, overhead, and other direct or allocated costs involved in their manufacture or delivery. Costs associated with engineering service revenue are included in cost of service revenue, unless the engineering service effort meets the criteria for government-funded research, as outlined in SFAS 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs. If the contract meets the criteria for a government funded research arrangement, the costs to deliver the contract are included in research and development expense. Cost of service revenue includes all costs incurred in the support and maintenance of our products, as well as costs to deliver professional services, including the costs associated with third-party products.

Overall, gross profit margin for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 increased from 37.3% to 38.4% compared with the corresponding periods of fiscal 2006. This improvement was primarily due to an improvement in service gross profit margin, offset in part by a decline in product and other gross profit margin.

Product and other gross profit margin for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased 1.4 percentage points compared with the corresponding period in fiscal 2006. As a result of fixed manufacturing costs, cost of sales did not

35

decline in proportion to our lower sales volumes in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 compared with the corresponding period in fiscal 2006. Competitive pricing pressures from low cost commodity cluster systems also contributed to the decline in gross profit margin. In addition, we continue to see a shift in revenue mix from our MIPS/IRIX-based systems, which typically carry higher gross margins to our Intel/Linux-based systems, which have lower gross margins. The decline in product and other gross profit margin for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 compared with the corresponding period in fiscal 2006 was offset in part by fewer large low margin transactions, which are typically negotiated with high discount rates due to very competitive bidding processes.

Service gross profit margin for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 increased 1.7 percentage points compared with the corresponding periods in fiscal 2006. The improvements in service gross profit margins primarily resulted from the positive impact of our restructuring actions resulting from headcount reductions and other cost control measures coupled with improved margins on professional services contracts.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses were as follows (dollars in millions):

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 29, 2006			Sept. 30, 2005
Research and development	$	16		$	23
% of total revenue		13	%		15	%
Selling, general and administrative	$	42		$	60
% of total revenue		35	%		37	%
Other operating expenses, net	$	4		$	7
% of total revenue		3	%		4	%

Operating Expenses (excluding Other Operating Expenses). Operating expenses, excluding other operating expenses, for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased by 30% from the corresponding period of fiscal 2006 and decreased as a percentage of total revenue from 52% to 48%. The decline in operating expenses was primarily attributable to lower headcount resulting from our restructuring activities and through employee attrition and from the impact of our overall expense control measures aimed at bringing expenses in line with prevailing revenue levels. The reduction in operating expenses improved slightly by the fact that the Predecessor Company’s accounting calendar had 13 weeks during the first three months of fiscal 2007 compared with 14 weeks during the first three months of fiscal 2006.

Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased $7 million or 31% compared with the corresponding period of fiscal 2006. The decrease reflects a 24% reduction in headcount and lower facilities and information technology-related costs resulting from continued restructuring actions to reduce expenses, unplanned attrition and credits to expense received from Research and development funding arrangements. We will continue to focus our research and development investments toward potential growth areas, including investments in our Altix family of servers while leveraging the research and development efforts of our industry partners, as we continue to move to product lines that incorporate industry standard technologies.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased by $18 million or 29% compared with the corresponding period of fiscal 2006. Decreases were primarily due to a 42% reduction in headcount and other cost savings measures.

Other Operating Expenses. Over the past several years in response to declining revenues, the Predecessor Company initiated a number of restructuring actions, under various plans, aimed at reducing the level of cash consumed in operations and restoring long-term profitability to SGI. These actions have resulted in both headcount reductions and facility closures. Other operating expense of $4 million and $7 million for the first quarters of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, respectively, represented the costs of our restructuring plans. Other operating expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 includes a $4 million charge for severance costs and immaterial other accruals and adjustments. As of September

36

29, 2006, as a result of the restructuring actions undertaken, we anticipate operating cash outflows of $4 million during the 12 months following September 29, 2006, for severance and related charges and $2 million through fiscal 2011 for facilities related expenditures, which is net of estimated sublease income of $2 million. See Note 6 to our Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for further information regarding restructuring activities.

Interest and Other

Interest and other income (expense) were as follows (in thousands):

	Predecessor Company
	Three Months Ended
	September 29, 2006			September 30, 2005
Interest expense	$	(7,688	)	$	(3,475	)
Investment gain (loss)	$	10,100		$	(227	)
Foreign exchange gain (loss)		23			(161	)
Miscellaneous income (expense)		526			(273	)
Interest income		637			300
Interest and other income (expense), net	$	11,286		$	(361	)
Income (loss) from equity investment	$	105		$	(1,468	)

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased from the first quarter of fiscal 2006 to the first quarter of fiscal 2007 principally due to the amortization of short-term loan costs associated with our DIP financing arrangement that was completed late in the fourth quarter of 2006. The DIP financing arrangement also carried a higher rate of interest than the credit facilities utilized in fiscal 2006, which also contributed to higher interest expense.

Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net. Interest and other income (expense), net includes interest income on our cash investments, gains and losses on other investments, and other non-operating items. Interest income and other, net , for the three months ended September 29, 2006, is primarily composed of a $10 million pre-tax gain on the sale of a portion of our equity interest in SGI Japan.

Income (Loss) from Equity Investment. Income (loss) from equity investment represents our share of the results of operations of SGI Japan.

Reorganization items

Reorganization Items, Net. Reorganization items, net represent expense or income amounts incurred as a direct result of the Company’s Chapter 11 filing and are presented separately in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Such items consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Three months ended
	September 29, 2006
Professional fees	$	8,942
Gains on settlements with creditors		(6,343	)
Effects of the plan of reorganization and fresh-start reporting		(142,033	)
Increase to fresh-start basis of assets and liabilities		(200,963	)
	$	(340,397	)

37

Provision for Income Taxes

The Predecessor Company’s net provision for income taxes of $2.4 million for the first three months of fiscal 2007 arose principally from withholding taxes paid on our gain on the sale of a portion of our equity interest in SGI Japan mentioned above and net income taxes payable in foreign jurisdictions. The net benefit for income taxes of $0.5 million for the first three months of fiscal 2006 arose principally from net income taxes payable in foreign jurisdictions.

Financial Condition

Cash Balances. At September 29, 2006, our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and marketable investments totaled $83 million, compared with $55 million at June 30, 2006. The balance as of the September 29, 2006 Fresh Start date includes the effect of the financing and equity Plan effects which resulted in net cash inflows of $29 million. The payment of approximately $48 million in Plan related obligations that were paid beginning on Oct. 17, 2006, and will continue on negotiated payment terms through the third quarter of fiscal 2007, have not been deducted from this cash balance. In addition, at emergence we had $30 million of capacity available under the exit financing revolver. We plan to utilize up to the full availability under the revolver to fund intra-quarter cash needs starting in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. At September 29, 2006 and June 30, 2006, The Predecessor Company also held $50 million and $48 million, respectively, of restricted investments. Restricted investments consist of short- and long-term investments held under a security agreement or pledged as collateral against letters of credit. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents compared with June 30, 2006 is primarily the result of cash used in operations during the first three months of fiscal 2007, offset in part by cash provided by the sale of a portion of the equity investment in SGI Japan to SGI Japan, Ltd and the Predecessor Company’s borrowings.

Cash Consumption Trends. Primarily as a result of net losses and costs associated with the Chapter 11 proceedings, operating activities used $30 million during the first three months of fiscal 2007, compared with providing $9 million during the same period of fiscal 2006. The negative operating cash flows in the first three months of fiscal 2007 were primarily due to the Predecessor Company’s operating losses and low revenue levels. The Predecessor Company generated $8 million from its accounts receivable collections during the first three months of fiscal 2007, a decrease from the $23 million that was generated during the same period of fiscal 2006. During the first three months of fiscal 2007, inventory increased $14 million compared to the $6 million decrease in inventory reported in the first three months of fiscal 2006. Deferred revenue increased $18 million in the first three months of fiscal 2007 compared with an increase of $6 million in the same period of fiscal 2006, primarily resulting from lower customer support contract renewals. Accounts payable increased $6 million in the first three months of fiscal 2007 compared with a decrease of $5 million in the same period of fiscal 2006, consistent with the level of inventory purchases in each period presented. During the first three months of fiscal 2007, accrued compensation increased $3 million compared with the $4 million decrease in accrued compensation in the same period of fiscal 2006 primarily due to the timing of the payment of payroll as well as fluctuations in headcount due to planned reductions and attrition. Included in the Predecessor Company’s cash used in operating activities from continuing operations are cash payments related to past restructuring actions. Cash payments for severance and contractual and facilities obligations related to these actions totaled approximately $5 million and $8 million in first three months of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, respectively. In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, adjustments were made to cashflow from operations to reflect the effect of the plan of reorganization and the associated revaluation of assets and liabilities.

Investing activities provided $16 million in cash during the first three months of fiscal 2007, compared with using $2 million during the same period of fiscal 2006. The positive cash flows in the first three months of fiscal 2007 were primarily due to the sale of a portion of our equity investment in SGI Japan to SGI Japan, Ltd. Principal investing activities in the first three months of both fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 primarily consisted of purchases of property and equipment of $1 million each.

Financing activities provided $41 million in cash during the first three months of fiscal 2007, compared with $3 million during the same period of fiscal 2006. During the first three months of fiscal 2007, we repaid debt principal of $130 million and received proceeds of $30 million from DIP funding issued while under Chapter 11 and $85 million from our new exit financing. During the first three months of fiscal 2006, the Predecessor Company received $1 million for future customer support in connection with products that we sold under certain sales-type leases; we are required by EITF 88-18, Sales of Future Revenue, to account for the accumulated proceeds from these arrangements as debt. During the first three months of fiscal 2006, the Predecessor Company also received proceeds of $2 million from stock issued under the Predecessor Company’s employee stock plans.

38

The Predecessor Company incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations during each of the past several fiscal years. At September 29, 2006, the Successor Company’s principal sources of liquidity included unrestricted cash and marketable investments of $83 million, up from the Predecessor Company’s balance of $55 million at June 30, 2006. Currently, we expect to consume cash from operations through at least the first half of fiscal 2007. We also experience significant intra-quarter fluctuations in our cash levels, with the result that our cash balances are generally at their highest point at the end of each quarter and significantly lower at other times. These intra-quarter fluctuations reflect our business cycle, with significant requirements for inventory purchases in the early part of the quarter and most sales closing in the last few weeks of the quarter. To maintain adequate levels of unrestricted cash within each quarter, we offer certain customers discounted terms for early payment and hold certain vendor payments until the beginning of the following quarter. We also continue to focus on expense controls, margin improvement initiatives and working capital efficiencies. However, it is essential to our operating plan for fiscal 2007 that our restructuring plan yields its anticipated savings and we meet the goals of our exit financing agreement for fiscal 2007.

DIP Financing. On May 10, 2006, the Predecessor Company entered into an Interim DIP Agreement with the Interim DIP Lenders. The Interim DIP Agreement provided a $70 million term loan to the Borrowers secured by certain of the Borrowers’ assets. In June 2006, the Debtors entered into the DIP Agreement with the DIP Lenders providing up to $130 million of debtor-in-possession financing consisting of a $100 million term loan and a $30 million revolving line of credit. This DIP Agreement was approved by the Court on June 26, 2006 and replaced the $70 million Interim DIP Financing and the pre-petition credit agreement. The DIP Agreement was secured by certain assets of the Borrowers.

The DIP Agreement terminated upon Emergence from Chapter 11 and the $113 million outstanding balance was paid in full with proceeds from the Rights Offering and sale of Overallotment shares and funds from the exit financing facility described below.

Exit Financing. On the Emergence Date, the Successor Company entered into a credit agreement with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc and General Electric Capital Corporation to provide exit liquidity financing as part of our plan to emerge from bankruptcy. The exit financing facility provides up to $115 million of financing consisting of an $85 million term loan from Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and a $30 million line of credit from General Electric Capital Corporation. The new facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of SGI and its domestic subsidiaries and has customary terms and conditions, including covenants related to minimum levels of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) and minimum levels of cash and cash equivalents, and limits on capital expenditures. This facility, combined with net proceeds of $57 million from the Rights Offering and sale of Overallotment shares, was used to pay off $113 million due under our existing DIP Agreement, to fund payments, including closing costs and related fees, required to be made on the Emergence Date pursuant to the Plan, and to provide working capital for the Company's ongoing operations. The exit financing facility matures in October 2011. The annual payments, including estimated interest, over the next five years are as follows (in millions): fiscal 2007 — $11; fiscal 2008 — $12; fiscal 2009 — $24; fiscal 2010 — $27; fiscal 2011 — $24 and $40 thereafter.

Forecasts of future events are inherently uncertain, and there are significant risks associated with the achievement of our goals for the remainder of fiscal 2007. While we are continuing to implement initiatives aimed at improving revenue and margins for our Core Systems products, we expect to continue consuming cash from operations through at least calendar year 2006. In addition to cash generated from our operations, we expect the net funds from our new credit agreement to provide working capital for our ongoing operations. We cannot be certain however, that the funds provided by the new credit agreement will be adequate to achieve our objectives. If we are unable to achieve the goals of our going-forward business plan and operational restructuring strategy, we may be forced to develop and implement further restructuring plans, evaluate other strategic alternatives, or become subject to further insolvency proceedings.

39

Contractual Obligations

During the first three months of fiscal 2007, the only material change to the Predecessor Company’s contractual obligations was the signing of a new lease for our replacement headquarters facility in Sunnyvale, California. On September 7, 2006 the Predecessor Company entered into a Lease Agreement with Christensen Holdings, L.P. The lease is for approximately 128,154 square feet with an initial five year lease term. We expect to occupy the new facility by the end of calendar 2006. The following are the future minimum rent obligations for this lease (in thousands):

	Successor Company
	Rent Obligations
Current Year	$	1,252
Fiscal 2008		1,554
Fiscal 2009		1,615
Fiscal 2010		1,677
Fiscal 2011		1,738
Thereafter		291

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate these estimates, including those related to customer programs and incentives; bad debts; inventory; lease residual values; warranty obligations; restructuring; incomes taxes and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates. We believe there have been no significant changes during the three months ended September 29, 2006 to the items that the Predecessor Company disclosed as its critical accounting policies and estimates in its discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006, except as noted below.

Fresh-Start Reporting

Although we emerged from bankruptcy on October 17, 2006, we adopted “fresh-start” reporting as of September 29, 2006 in accordance with SOP 90-7. Fresh-start reporting was required because holders of existing voting shares immediately before filing and confirmation of the plan received less than 50% of the voting shares of the emerging entity and its reorganization value was less than its post petition liabilities and allowed claims. Fresh-start required us to allocate our reorganization value to our assets and liabilities in a manner similar to that which is required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Under the provisions of fresh-start accounting, a new entity has been deemed created for financial reporting purposes. References to “Successor Company” in the Financial Statements and the notes thereto refer to the Company on and after September 29, 2006, after giving effect to the provisions of the Plan and the application of fresh-start accounting. References to “Predecessor Company” in the Financial Statements and notes thereto refer to the Company prior to September 29, 2006. Accordingly, our financial information disclosed under the heading “Successor Company” as of September 29, 2006 is presented on a basis different from, and is therefore not comparable to, our financial information disclosed under the heading “Predecessor Company” as of June 30, 2006. For further information on fresh-start accounting see Note 4.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 29, 2006 gives effect to adjustments to the carrying value of assets or amounts and classifications of liabilities that were necessary when adopting fresh-start reporting. The statements of operations and cash flows for the three-month period ended September 29, 2006 reflect the operations of the Predecessor Company, which includes the gain from the discharge of debt and the application of fresh-start reporting. The adoption of fresh-start reporting had a material effect on the consolidated financial statements as of September 29, 2006 and will have a material impact on consolidated statements of operations for periods subsequent to September 29, 2006.

40

In addition, the Successor Company was required to adopt changes in accounting principles that will be required in the consolidated financial statements of the Successor Company within the twelve months following the adoption of fresh-start reporting. The Successor Company is still in the process of completing its review of these accounting pronouncements for impact on its consolidated results of operations.

Risks That Affect Our Business

We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks, some of which are beyond our control.

We have been incurring losses and consuming cash in our operations and must reverse these trends. The Predecessor Company incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations resulting from year over year declines in revenue during each of the past several fiscal years. At September 29, 2006, the Predecessor Company’s principal source of liquidity was unrestricted cash and marketable investments of $53 million, down from $77 million at September 30, 2005. Currently, we expect to continue consuming cash from operations through at least the first half of fiscal 2007. We also experience significant intra-quarter fluctuations in our cash levels, with the result that our cash balances are generally at their highest point at the end of each quarter and significantly lower at other times. These intra-quarter fluctuations reflect our business cycle, with significant requirements for inventory purchases in the early part of the quarter and most sales closing in the last few weeks of the quarter. To maintain adequate levels of unrestricted cash within each quarter, we offer certain customers discounted terms for early payment and hold certain vendor payments to the beginning of the following quarter. We also continue to focus on expense controls, margin improvement initiatives and working capital efficiencies. However, it is essential to our operating plans for fiscal 2007 that our restructuring plan yields its anticipated savings and we meet the goals of our financing arrangements. See“—Financial Condition”.

To seek to improve our liquidity, we are continuing to implement restructuring actions aimed at substantial expense reductions and a revenue generation initiative aimed at reversing the decline in our revenues. In addition, our operating goals require us to maintain stable year-over-year revenue levels while realizing our targeted expense savings and margin improvements. If we fail to achieve these targets, we will likely consume further cash in our operations, which would further impair our liquidity. See “—Financial Condition”.

Our financial results have been and will continue to be affected by the adoption of fresh-start accounting and do not reflect historical trends. Our emergence from Chapter 11 proceedings on the Emergence Date has resulted in a new reporting entity and adoption of fresh-start reporting in accordance with Statement of Position (“SOP”) 90-7 Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code. As required by fresh-start accounting, our assets and liabilities have been preliminarily adjusted to fair value, and certain assets and liabilities not previously recognized in the Company's financial statements have been recognized under fresh-start accounting. The condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2006 do not give effect to any adjustments in the carrying values of assets or liabilities that were recorded upon implementation of the Plan and the adoption of fresh-start accounting on September 29, 2006. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations from and after September 29, 2006 are not comparable to the financial condition and results of operations reflected in the historical consolidated financial statements of the Predecessor Company. For further information about fresh-start accounting, see Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, "Fresh-Start Reporting”.

We face significant challenges in connection with our reorganization. On May 8, 2006, the Predecessor Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. We emerged from Chapter 11 effective as of the Emergence Date. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for further information. Our ability to continue as a going-concern is dependent upon, among other things, (i) our ability to successfully achieve required cost savings to complete our restructuring; (ii) our ability to maintain adequate cash on hand; (iii) our ability to generate cash from operations; (iv) our ability to achieve profitability, and (v) our ability to implement our revenue stabilization initiatives. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully achieve these objectives in order to continue as a going-concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should we be unable to continue as a going-concern.

41

We may not achieve our operating goals and may not be in compliance with debt covenants. On the Emergence Date, we entered into a credit agreement with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and General Electric Capital Corporation to provide exit liquidity financing as part of our plan to emerge from bankruptcy. The exit financing facility provides up to $115 million of financing consisting of an $85 million term loan from Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and a $30 million line of credit from General Electric Capital Corporation. This facility, combined with net proceeds of $57 million from the Rights Offering and sale of Overallotment shares, were used to pay off $113 million due under our existing DIP Agreement, to fund payments, including closing costs and related fees, required to be made on the Emergence Date pursuant to the Plan, and to provide working capital for our ongoing operations. See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Under the terms of the exit financing, we are required to comply with various terms and conditions. Although to date we have been in compliance, there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with such terms and conditions in the future. In the event that we default under the exit financing agreement and the exit financing agreement is terminated, there can be no assurance that sufficient alternative financing arrangements will be available. Furthermore, in the event that cash flows, together with available borrowings under the exit financing or alternative financing arrangements, are not sufficient to meet the Company’s cash requirements, we may be required to reduce planned capital expenditures, sell additional assets and seek other sources of capital. We can provide no assurance that such actions will be sufficient to cover any cash shortfalls. The need to comply with the terms of our debt obligations may also limit our ability to obtain additional financing and our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business and the industry. In addition, if we are unable to achieve the goals of our going-forward business plan and operational restructuring strategy, we may be forced to sell all or parts of our business, develop and implement further restructuring plans or become subject to further insolvency proceedings.

Our bankruptcy reorganization may negatively impact our future operations and the operations of our subsidiaries. During the course of our Chapter 11 proceedings, the Court entered orders allowing us to pay certain pre-petition key vendor trade claims in the ordinary course of business, however, we were not permitted to pay all of our vendors in full. Although we did not experience any significant disruption in our relationships with our suppliers or vendors during the reorganization, we may have difficulty maintaining existing relationships, or creating new relationships with suppliers or vendors in the future due to the residual effects of the bankruptcy filing. Our suppliers and vendors could stop providing supplies or services to us or provide such supplies or services only on terms such as ‘cash on delivery,’ ‘cash on order,’ or other terms that could have an adverse impact on our short-term cash flows. In addition, the fact that we recently completed a bankruptcy reorganization may adversely affect our ability to retain existing customers, attract new customers and maintain contracts that are critical to our operations.

The publicity surrounding our bankruptcy reorganization might also adversely affect the businesses of our non-debtor subsidiaries. Because our business is closely related to the businesses of all of our subsidiaries, any downturn in the business of our subsidiaries could also affect our prospects. It remains uncertain whether our recently completed bankruptcy reorganization and the associated risks will adversely affect the businesses of any of our subsidiaries in the future.

The cancellation of our prior common stock may adversely affect our ability to attract new stockholders in the future. Under the Plan, all of the Predecessor Company’s existing common stock was cancelled upon emergence and the holders of such securities received no recovery. This has caused a significant negative reaction from the Predecessor Company’s former stockholders and may adversely affect our ability to attract new stockholders in the future.

Our on-going restructuring activities may not reduce our losses and cash consumption. The Predecessor Company implemented several expense-related restructurings in recent years. In addition, in September 2005, March 2006, and June 2006, the Predecessor Company began to implement restructuring plans aimed at further substantial expense reductions and we continue to execute on these plans. See "—Overview—Further Restructurings to Reduce Expenses". Although we will seek to implement these actions in a manner that does not materially reduce revenue or impair our ability to compete successfully, we cannot be certain that these outcomes will not occur or that these actions will accomplish their intended objective of reducing our losses and cash consumption. Substantially all of the restructuring charges have required or will require the outlay of cash.

We are operating under new leadership that will cause strategic and operational changes in our business. On January 27, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Predecessor Company appointed Mr. Dennis McKenna as the new President and Chief Executive Officer in order to effectuate the turnaround of the business. In addition, our Board of

42

Directors appointed Mr. McKenna as a director on February 1, 2006. Also on February 27, 2006, Mr. Jeffery Zellmer, the Predecessor Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Mr. Warren Pratt, the Predecessor Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, resigned. Ms. Kathy Lanterman, the Predecessor Company’s Vice President and Controller, was appointed the new Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Predecessor Company. We are currently in a transition period as a result of these leadership changes and we cannot assure you that such strategic and operational changes will lead to an improvement of our business and financial condition. There can also be no assurance that any such strategic and operational changes will not lead to a further deterioration of our business or financial condition.

Our efforts to complete the Company’s turnaround efforts will require significant changes in the executive structure. Our success depends on our ability to hire key incremental skills into the Successor Company at an executive level. While we are making every effort to identify and hire the identified new talent, we can make no assurances as to the amount of time this process will take. In addition, the process may result in additional changes in key employee and executive positions as we work to establish our future company organization. We cannot assure you that such changes, if any, will lead to an improvement of our business and financial condition.

We may not be able to raise additional capital in the future. In the future, we may need to obtain additional financing to fund our business or repay our debt, and we cannot assure you that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us. In addition, if funds are raised by incurring further debt, our operations and finances may become subject to further restrictions and we may be required to limit our service or product development activities or other operations, or otherwise modify our business strategy. If we fail to comply with financial or other covenants required in connection with such a financing, our creditors may be able to exercise remedies that could substantially impair our ability to operate. In addition, if we obtain additional funds by selling any of our equity securities or if we issue equity derivative securities in connection with obtaining debt financing, the percentage ownership of our stockholders will be reduced, stockholders may experience additional dilution, or the equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to the common stock.

Our success is dependent on continued revenue growth from newer product families. The SGI Altix family of servers and superclusters based on the Intel Itanium 2 processor and the Linux operating system was introduced in January 2003 and additional products in this line were added during fiscal 2004. In addition, our SGI Altix XE family of cluster products was introduced in June 2006. Our Linux-based systems sales declined by 40% in fiscal 2006 compared with fiscal 2005. Risks associated with these newer product families include dependence on Intel in terms of price, supply, dependability, performance, product roadmaps and timely access to design specifications, and continued support for and development of the Itanium 2 and Xeon processor families; the availability of Linux applications optimized for the 64-bit Itanium platform or our scalable systems architecture; acceptance of the Linux operating system in demanding environments; and competition from other suppliers of Intel-based servers, including clusters of low-end servers. These clusters are rapidly increasing as an important competitive factor in the high performance server market and have had a negative effect on our revenues and our gross margins.

Future revenue growth from our newer product families is especially important because revenues from our traditional MIPS and IRIX products and maintenance business are expected to continue to decline. Our ability to achieve future revenue growth will depend significantly on the market success of these newer product families in servers and storage as well as our ability to generate sales to match or replace revenues generated from large sales transactions in prior periods. If one or more of the product lines were to fail in the market, it could have an adverse effect on our business and liquidity.

Our product strategy and business would be adversely affected by any delay, discontinuance or decreased competitiveness of the microprocessors we use. Our core products are based on system architectures that have been developed by working closely with partners for optimization on our products. Our product strategy and business depend on the continued availability and competitiveness of the microprocessors that we use and would be adversely affected by any further delays and/or discontinuance of these processor families. In addition, we may incur penalties under long-term contracts that require the delivery of future products. It is also important to our competitive position that our chosen microprocessors be competitive as to performance as well as price. Microprocessor technology changes rapidly, and in order to be competitive we must keep pace with those changes. Although we have taken steps with the introduction of new products to mitigate our dependence on a single microprocessor, the transition will take some time, and the migration may be expensive and time consuming.

43

Our financial reporting controls and procedures may be impaired by our restructuring activities and attrition. The uncertainties surrounding our business prospects, the Chapter 11 filing, and our continuing restructuring actions have increased the challenges of attracting and retaining qualified employees. Attrition rates have increased significantly in fiscal 2006 and the first quarter of fiscal 2007 compared with fiscal 2005. There is no guarantee that we can retain highly qualified employees, or that we will be able to hire highly qualified candidates, as new skills are needed. In addition, while we will strive to ensure that material weaknesses do not develop in our internal controls due to headcount reductions or other factors, there is no guarantee that our internal controls will be unaffected by the restructuring actions or increasing attrition. If material weaknesses develop and we are unable to efficiently and effectively address these matters, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our internal controls over financial reporting.

We are increasingly dependent on our key suppliers. Our strategy of developing system products based on industry-standard technologies has increased our technical dependence on Intel and other key suppliers. It is therefore important that we receive appropriate development cooperation from our suppliers, and that the products from these suppliers continue to evolve in ways that support the differentiation that we seek to bring to our products. In particular, our Altix family depends on continued component availability, dependability, quality, performance and price/performance. Our financial performance and business prospects would be adversely affected if our suppliers were to reduce their support, including to supply components on terms that enable us to compete effectively for sales with substantial price sensitivity.

The competitiveness of our system products, particularly our servers, is also significantly affected by the availability on our platform of third-party software applications that are important to customers in our target markets. The success of our Linux-based products and services depends on, among other things, the growth of the Linux market, the acceptance of Linux solutions by customers in demanding environments, the availability of Linux applications optimized for the 64-bit Itanium 2 platform or our scalable systems architecture and our dependence on acceptance of SGI-developed code by the open source community and by Linux distributors with whom we partner.

Our dependence on key suppliers, including sole source suppliers, may prevent us from delivering an acceptable product on a timely basis. We rely on both single source and sole source suppliers for many of the components we use in our products. For example, we currently utilize microprocessors from a sole source supplier in our Altix family of servers and superclusters and have designed our system architecture to optimize performance using their processors. If we were to utilize an alternative microprocessor, the transition would require an alternative design, which would be costly and cause significant delays in the development of future products, adversely affecting our business and operating results.

Our business is dependent on our ability to anticipate our needs for components and products and our suppliers’ ability to deliver such components and products in time to meet critical manufacturing and distribution schedules. In addition, we have benefited from favorable discounts on certain components from key suppliers for selected transactions. Our business could be adversely affected, for example, if suppliers fail to meet product release schedules, if we experience supply constraints, if we fail to negotiate favorable pricing or if we experience any other interruption or delay in the supply chain that interferes with our ability to manufacture our products or manage our inventory levels. Risks also include limited bargaining flexibility, the possibility of charges for excess and obsolete inventory and risks involved with end of life buys from single source and sole source suppliers. We are currently focused on maximizing our working capital by working closely with our suppliers and tightly managing our overall supply chain.

In addition, we are in the process of transitioning to an alternate supplier to act as our foundry for certain key integrated circuits for new products planned for 2008 and later. There can be no assurance that we will be able to complete the transition without significant incremental cash impact.

We may not be able to retain and attract qualified employees. Our success depends on our ability to continue to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified technical, sales and marketing and management personnel. The uncertainties surrounding our business prospects, the Chapter 11 Cases and our continuing restructuring actions have increased the challenges of retaining world-class talent. Our attrition rates have increased significantly in fiscal 2006 and the first quarter of fiscal 2007 compared with fiscal 2005. Although we have put programs in place to encourage employee retention, there is no guarantee that we can retain highly qualified employees or that we will be able to hire highly qualified candidates as new skills are needed.

44

We are dependent on sales to the U.S. government. A significant portion of our revenue is derived from sales to the U.S. government, either directly by us or through system integrators and other resellers. Sales to the government present risks in addition to those involved in sales to commercial customers, including potential disruptions due to changes in appropriation and spending patterns. Our U.S. government business is also highly sensitive to changes in the U.S. government's national and international priorities and budgeting. Events like Operation Iraqi Freedom and the continuing war on terrorism may affect funding for our programs or result in changes in government programs or spending priorities that may adversely affect our business. In addition, the U.S. government can typically terminate or modify its contracts with us at any time for its convenience. Our government business is also subject to specific procurement regulations and a variety of other requirements. Failure to comply with these or other applicable regulations and requirements could lead to suspension or debarment from government contracting or subcontracting for a period of time. Any disruption or limitation in our ability to do business with the U.S. government could have an adverse impact on us.

A portion of our business requires security clearances from the U.S. government. These arrangements are subject to periodic review by customer agencies and the Defense Security Service of the Department of Defense.

We expect our operating results to fluctuate for a variety of reasons. Our revenue and operating results may fluctuate for a number of reasons from period to period, and we have consistently fallen short of our forecasts in recent years. Decreases in revenue can arise from any number of factors, including decreased demand, supply constraints, delays in the availability of new products, transit interruptions, overall economic conditions, competitive factors, military or terrorist actions, or natural disasters. Demand can also be adversely affected by concerns specifically associated with our financial health and by product and technology transition announcements by us or our competitors. The timing of customer acceptance of certain large-scale server products may also have a significant effect on periodic operating results. Margins are heavily influenced by revenue levels, mix considerations, including geographic concentrations, the mix of product and service revenue, industry price trends, competitive pricing pressures (particularly for high visibility accounts) and the mix of server and desktop product revenue as well as the mix of configurations within these product categories. As a result of the concentration of sales in the third month of each quarter, developments late in a quarter can have a significant impact on that period's results.

We operate in a highly competitive industry. The computer industry is highly competitive, with rapid technological advances and constantly improving price/performance. Most of our competitors have substantially greater technical, marketing and financial resources. They also generally have a larger installed base of customers and a wider range of available applications software. Competition may result in significant discounting and lower gross margins. In addition, as our Linux-based systems business grows, the number of our competitors may grow commensurate with the increased market opportunity. An important competitive development in our market has been the emergence of networked clusters of commodity computers from suppliers like Dell Computer as an alternative to our midrange products. These clusters have grown at a faster than anticipated rate and are taking an increasing share of the high-performance computing market. These clustered systems may not be subject to U.S. export regulations, which may make them more attractive to certain international customers. See “—Many of our international sales require export licenses”. Although we have introduced a cluster product, we face significant competition in this market.

Our typical concentration of sales at the end of our fiscal quarters makes period-to-period financial results less predictable. Over half of each quarter’s product revenue results from orders booked and shipped during the third month, and disproportionately in the latter half of that month. This makes the forecasting of revenue inherently uncertain and can produce pressure on our internal infrastructure during the third month of a quarter. Because we plan our operating expenses, many of which are relatively fixed in the short term, on expected revenue, even a relatively small revenue shortfall may cause a period’s results to be substantially below expectations.

We are subject to the risks of international operations. We generate a large portion of our revenue outside the United States, and as a result, our business is subject to the risks associated with doing business internationally. International transactions frequently involve increased financial and legal risks arising from stringent contractual terms and conditions and the widely differing legal systems and customs in foreign countries. War, terrorism or public health issues in the regions of the world in which we do business have caused and may continue to cause damage or disruption

45

to commerce by creating economic and political uncertainties. Such events could adversely affect our business in any number of ways, such as decreasing demand for our products, increasing our costs of operations, making it difficult to deliver products to customers, and causing delays and other problems in our supply chain. Our future revenue, gross margin, expenses and financial condition could also suffer due to other international factors, including but not limited to: changes in a country’s economic and labor conditions; currency fluctuations; compliance with a variety of foreign laws, as well as U.S. laws affecting the activities of U.S. companies abroad; changes in tax laws; changes in the regulatory or legal environment; difficulties associated with repatriating cash generated abroad; fluctuations in transportation costs; natural and medical disasters; and trade protection measures.

Many of our international sales require export licenses. Our sales to customers outside the United States are subject to U.S. export regulations. Sales of many of our high-end products require clearance and export licenses from the U.S. Department of Commerce under these regulations. Our international sales would be adversely affected if such regulations were tightened, or if they are not modified over time to reflect the increasing performance of our products. Delay or denial in the granting of any required licenses could make it more difficult to make sales to foreign customers. In addition, we could be subject to regulations, fines and penalties for violations of import and export regulations such as our products being shipped directly or through a third-party to certain countries. Such violations could result in penalties, including prohibiting us from exporting our products to one or more countries, and could materially and adversely affect our business.

We may not be able to develop and introduce new products on a timely basis. Meeting our objectives for the future will require that our recently introduced products achieve success in the marketplace and that we succeed in the timely development and introduction of more successful new products. Product transitions are a recurring part of our business. A number of risks are inherent in this process.

The development of new technology and products is increasingly complex and uncertain, which increases the risk of delays. The introduction of new computer systems requires close collaboration and continued technological advancement involving multiple hardware and software design teams, internal manufacturing teams, outside suppliers of key components such as semiconductors and outsource manufacturing partners. The failure of any one of these elements could cause our products under development to fail to meet specifications or to miss the aggressive timetables that we establish. There is no assurance that development or acceptance of our new systems will not be affected by delays in this process. In addition, from time to time we receive co-funding for certain development efforts and reduction or elimination of such funding could adversely affect the development and introduction of new systems.

Our product strategy and business depend on the continued availability and competitiveness of the Itanium 2 processor family and would be adversely affected by any delays and/or discontinuance of this processor family. See “—Our product strategy and business would be adversely affected by any delay, discontinuance or decreased competitiveness of the microprocessors we use”. In addition, we may incur penalties under long-term contracts that require the delivery of future products.

Short product life cycles place a premium on our ability to manage the transition to new products. We often announce new products in the early part of a quarter while the product is in the final stages of development and testing, and seek to manufacture and ship the product in volume during the same quarter. Our results could be adversely affected by such factors as development delays, the release of products to manufacturing late in any quarter, quality or yield problems experienced by suppliers, variations in product costs and excess inventories of older products and components. In addition, some customers may delay purchasing existing products in anticipation of new product introductions.

Most products are upgraded during their product life cycle. The ability to upgrade products in a timely fashion is necessary to compete in the computer industry. Delay in introducing updates and upgrades can adversely affect acceptance and demand for product.

We may become involved in intellectual property disputes. We routinely receive communications from third parties asserting patent or other rights covering our products and technologies. Based upon our evaluation, we may take no action or may seek to obtain a license. We are in discussions with several parties regarding the potential use of our patents, which may result in licensing fees, royalties or a one-time settlement. If negotiations are not successful, we may need to litigate. If we were to litigate, we could incur significant costs and we might not prevail in our case. We are in discussions with several parties that have asserted intellectual property infringement claims. In any given case there is a

46

risk that a license will not be available on terms that we consider reasonable, or that litigation will ensue. We expect that, as the number of hardware and software patents issued continues to increase, and as competition in the markets we address intensifies, the volume of these intellectual property claims will also increase.

In addition, our growing visibility as a supplier of Linux-based systems and as a participant in the open source software community increases our risk of becoming embroiled in the intellectual property disputes concerning these subjects, such as the current widely reported litigations between SCO Group on the one hand and IBM and Red Hat on the other. The Predecessor Company received a notice from SCO Group purporting to terminate, as of October 14, 2003, our fully paid license to certain UNIX operating system-related code, under which we distribute our IRIX operating system, on the basis that we have breached the terms of such license. We believe that the SCO Group’s allegations are without merit and that our fully paid license is non-terminable. Nonetheless, there can be no assurance that this dispute with SCO Group will not escalate into litigation, which could have a material adverse effect on us, or that SCO Group’s intellectual property claims will not impair the market acceptance of the Linux operating system.

On August 3, 2006, LG Electronics, Inc. (“LGE”) filed a motion (the “LGE Motion”) in the Chapter 11 Cases of the Debtors seeking relief from the automatic stay pursuant to section 362(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code so that LGE may proceed with certain patent infringement claims against us in the appropriate district court and seek damages for alleged pre- and post-petition infringements of certain of LGE’s patents. The LGE Motion also requests that the Court determine that the automatic stay does not apply to LGE’s ability to commence a proceeding against us in respect of our alleged continuing, post-petition infringement of LGE’s patents. LGE also filed proofs of claims in the Chapter 11 Cases against each of the Debtors in connection with the alleged patent infringement. On August 25, 2006, the Debtors objected to LGE's proofs of claim. The Debtors and LGE resolved the LGE Motion by stipulation dated September 8, 2006, and entered by the Court on September 8, 2006. In the stipulation, LGE agreed to withdraw the LGE Motion, agreed not to file any objection to confirmation of the Debtors' plan of reorganization, and agreed to withdraw all proofs of claim asserting pre-petition infringement except the one filed against the Company. The Debtors agreed that LGE claims alleging patent infringement first arising after the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases could be adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction other than the Court after confirmation of the plan of reorganization. On September 26, 2006, we filed a motion to estimate the LGE claims at $0.00 for purposes of allowance and distribution under the Plan. On October 24, 2006, we reached an agreement in principle with LGE to settle its pre-petition claim. Under that agreement, LGE will receive an allowed general unsecured claim payable from funds set aside for the satisfaction of pre-petition claims under the Plan. The precise amount of LGE’s allowed claim has not yet been determined. The agreement is subject to negotiation and execution of a mutually-acceptable settlement agreement, which the parties anticipate completing by the end of November 2006. The settlement is without prejudice to the parties’ claims and defenses regarding LGE’s allegations of post-petition infringement.

We do not believe that LGE’s claims of post-petition patent infringement are meritorious and we intend to oppose them. On September 28, 2006, we filed a lawsuit against LGE in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California seeking a declaratory judgment that we do not infringe LGE’s patents. See “Legal Proceedings”.

On April 27, 2004, the Predecessor Company received a letter from counsel for Patriot Scientific Corporation listing six patents purportedly owned by Patriot concerning various microprocessor technologies. The letter did not name any specific SGI products but noted that Patriot had commenced litigation against six companies in two separate litigations, including Intel. On September 23, 2005, the Predecessor Company received a follow up letter from Alliacense, which purported to be a successor entity to Patriot. The September 2005 letter stated that Alliacense had reached agreement with several companies, including Intel and AMD, for licenses to the subject patents. The letter did not identify any specific products of SGI that Alliacense believed to infringe any of the subject patents; however, the letter states Alliacense's belief that “virtually every product manufactured today utilizing microprocessors or embedded microprocessors" will require a portfolio license from Alliacense. We believe that Alliancense's assertions are without merit. See “Legal Proceedings”.

On October 23, 2006, we filed a patent infringement lawsuit against ATI Technologies Inc. in U.S. District Court — Western District of Wisconsin. In our complaint, we assert that products in ATI's line of Radeon^® graphics processors infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,650,327. The Complaint seeks unspecified damages and a Court Ordered injunction against future infringement by ATI.

47

We will not be able to utilize a significant portion of our net operating loss and credit carryforwards. Prior to our emergence from Chapter 11, the Predecessor Company had over $1 billion in U.S. net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards due to prior period losses. Most of these net operating loss carryforwards were incurred prior to our Chapter 11 reorganization and therefore are subject to limitation under U.S. and state income tax laws. Pursuant to these loss limitation rules, the utilization of net operating loss and credit carryforwards of a loss corporation are limited if during a testing period (usually three years) there is greater than a 50% cumulative shift in the ownership of its stock. As a result of the bankruptcy reorganization, we exchanged some of our debt for common stock. This exchange resulted in more than a 50% cumulative shift in our stock ownership. However section 382(l)(5)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) provides an exception to the above described limitation if the shift in ownership was as a result of bankruptcy filing under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. A taxpayer that takes advantage of this exception will lose its entire pre-bankruptcy net operating losses if within a period of two years from the date of the first shift in the ownership of its stock, it experiences a second shift in ownership that is greater than 50%. The Code also provides in section 382(l)(5)(H) that a taxpayer who ordinarily would qualify for this exception may elect out and become subject to the section 382 limitation. We are currently in the process of evaluating the benefit of electing out of this exception. The Code requires that the election to forego the benefit of this exception be made with a timely filed tax return for the year in which the shift in ownership occurred. If we elect to forego the benefit of section 382(l)(5)(A), our ability to utilize our net operating losses in future years will be limited. As a result, if in any given future fiscal period our taxable profits are in excess of the restricted losses available for offset, this limitation would reduce our after tax income, thereby negatively affecting our cash balances and liquidity.

Compliance or the failure to comply with environmental laws could impact our future net earnings. Certain of our products and operations are regulated under various laws in the U.S., Europe and other parts of the world relating to the environment, including laws and regulations that limit the use of certain substances in our products or require us to recycle our products when they become waste. While it is our policy to ensure that our operations and products comply with environmental laws at all times, any failure to so comply with environmental laws or customer requirements relating to such laws could require us to stop producing or selling certain products, recall noncompliant products, or otherwise incur substantial costs in order to acquire costly equipment to make other operational changes in order to achieve compliance. Although environmental costs and liabilities have not materially affected us to date, due to the nature of our operations and legal developments affecting our products and operations, environmental costs and liabilities could have a material adverse affect on our business and financial position in the future.

From time to time new regulations are enacted, and it is difficult to anticipate how such regulations will be implemented and enforced. We track regulatory developments that may impact our business and devote substantial resources toward developing strategies for compliance with new requirements as they are enacted.

For example, we face increasing complexity in our product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new and anticipated requirements relating to the materials composition of our products, including RoHS, which regulates the use of lead and other hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment put on the market in the European Union on or after July 1, 2006. Due to these restrictions, we have decided not to ship our remarketed products from the United States to Europe after July 1, 2006, and we are completing our work with our suppliers to assure RoHS compliance with respect to our other products. If a regulatory authority determines that one of our products is not RoHS-compliant, we may have to redesign and re-qualify certain components to meet RoHS requirements, which could subject us to increased engineering expenses in this process, and could face shipment delays, penalties and possible product detentions or seizures.

We may face significant costs and liabilities in connection with product take-back legislation, such as the European Union Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (“WEEE”), which makes producers of electrical and electronic equipment, including computers, responsible for the collection, recycling, treatment and disposal of past and future covered products. Legislation similar to RoHS and WEEE has been or may be enacted in other jurisdictions, including in the United States, Japan and China. These and other environmental laws may become stricter over time and require us to incur substantial compliance costs. RoHS and WEEE are being implemented by individual countries in the European Union and it is likely that each jurisdiction will implement, interpret or enforce RoHS and WEEE somewhat differently. In addition, final guidance from individual jurisdictions may impose different or additional responsibilities on us. Our failure to comply with WEEE and ROHS, contractual obligations relating to WEEE and RoHS or other environmental laws could result in our being directly or indirectly liable for costs, fines or penalties and third-party claims, and could jeopardize our ability to conduct business in countries in the European Union.

48

Our business is subject to market risk. In the normal course of business, our financial position is routinely subject to a variety of risks, including market risk associated with interest rate movements and currency rate movements on non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities, as well as collectibility of accounts receivable. We regularly assess these risks and have established policies and business practices to protect against the adverse effects of these and other potential exposures. As a result, we do not anticipate material losses in these areas.

49

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The information required under this Item 3 is included in the section above entitled “Our business is subject to market risk” and should be read in connection with the information on market risk related to changes in interest rates and non-U.S. currency exchange rates in Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q (the “evaluation date”). Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the evaluation date, to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time period specified in SEC rules and forms. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including cost limitations, the possibility of human error, judgments and assumptions regarding the likelihood of future events, and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

50

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in Note 20 to our Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q, which information is hereby incorporated by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

A restated description of the risk factors associated with our business is included under "Risks That Affect Our Business" in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," contained in Item 2 of Part I of this report. This description includes any material changes to and supersedes the description of the risk factors associated with our business previously disclosed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 5. Other Information

On November 7, 2006, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of the Successor Company approved performance bonus awards as described in the “Summary of November 7, 2006 Performance Bonus Awards” attached as Exhibit 10.2 to this Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following Exhibits are filed as part of this Report:

10.1	Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and its directors and executive officers.
10.2	Summary of November 7, 2006 Performance Bonus Awards.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Dennis McKenna and Kathy Lanterman.

51

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: November 13, 2006	SILICON GRAPHICS, INC. a Delaware corporation
	By:	/s/ Kathy Lanterman
		Kathy Lanterman
		Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller (Principal Financial Officer)

52

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.

INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

This Indemnification Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into effective as of                     , 2006 by and between Silicon Graphics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and                      (together with his/her estate, spouse, heirs, executors or personal or legal representatives, the “Indemnitee”).

WHEREAS, the Company and Indemnitee recognize that it continues to be difficult for the Company to obtain liability insurance for its directors, officers, employees, agents and fiduciaries, and that the cost of such insurance has significantly increased while the coverage of such insurance has generally been reduced;

WHEREAS, the Company and Indemnitee further recognize that there has been a substantial increase in corporate litigation in general, subjecting directors, officers, employees, agents and fiduciaries to expensive litigation risks at the same time as the availability and coverage of liability insurance has been severely limited;

WHEREAS, Indemnitee does not regard the current protection available as adequate under the present circumstances, and the Indemnitee and other directors, officers, employees, agents and fiduciaries of the Company may not be willing to continue to serve in such capacities without additional protection;

WHEREAS, the Company desires to attract and retain the services of highly qualified individuals, such as Indemnitee, to serve the Company and, in part, in order to induce Indemnitee to continue to provide services to the Company, wishes to provide for the indemnification and advancing of expenses to Indemnitee to the maximum extent permitted by law; and

WHEREAS, in view of the considerations set forth above, the Company desires that effective upon the date referred to above, Indemnitee shall be indemnified by the Company as set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Indemnitee hereby agree as follows:

1. Indemnification.

(a) Indemnification of Expenses. The Company shall indemnify Indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by law if Indemnitee was or is or becomes a party to or witness or other participant in, or is threatened to be made a party to or witness or other participant in, a Claim by reason of (or arising in part out of) an Indemnifiable Event against any and all Expenses, including all interest, assessments and other charges paid or payable in connection with or in respect of such Expenses. Such payment of

Expenses shall be made by the Company as soon as practicable but in any event no later than five (5) days after written demand by Indemnitee therefor is presented to the Company.

(b) Reviewing Party.

(i) The obligations of the Company under Section l(a) shall be subject to the condition that the Reviewing Party shall not have determined (in a written opinion, in any case in which the Independent Legal Counsel referred to in Section l(c) hereof is involved) that Indemnitee would not be permitted to be indemnified under applicable law. The obligation of the Company to make an advance payment of Expenses to Indemnitee pursuant to Section 2(a) (an “Expense Advance”) shall be subject to the condition that, if, when and to the extent that the Reviewing Party determines that Indemnitee would not be permitted to be so indemnified under applicable law, the Company shall be entitled to be reimbursed by Indemnitee (who hereby agrees to reimburse the Company) for all such amounts theretofore paid.

(ii) Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph (b)(i), if Indemnitee has commenced or thereafter commences legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to secure a determination that Indemnitee should be indemnified under applicable law, any determination made by the Reviewing Party that Indemnitee would not be permitted to be indemnified under applicable law shall not be binding, and Indemnitee shall not be required to reimburse the Company for any Expense Advance, until final judicial determination is made with respect thereto (as to which all rights of appeal therefrom have been exhausted or lapsed).

(iii) Indemnitee’s obligation to reimburse the Company for any Expense Advance shall be unsecured and no interest shall be charged thereon.

(iv) If there has not been a Change in Control, the Reviewing Party shall be selected by the Board of Directors, and if there has been such a Change in Control (other than a Change in Control which has been approved by a majority of the Company’s Board of Directors who were directors immediately prior to such Change in Control), the Reviewing Party shall be the Independent Legal Counsel referred to in Section l(c) hereof.

(v) If there has been no determination by the Reviewing Party or if the Reviewing Party determines that Indemnitee substantively would not be permitted to be indemnified in whole or in part under applicable law, Indemnitee shall have the right to commence litigation seeking an initial determination by the court or challenging any such determination by the Reviewing Party or any aspect thereof, including the legal or factual bases therefor, and the Company hereby consents to service of process and to appear in any such proceeding. Any determination by the Reviewing Party otherwise shall be conclusive and binding on the Company and Indemnitee.

-2-

(c) Change in Control. The Company agrees that if there is a Change in Control of the Company (other than a Change in Control which has been approved by a majority of the Company’s Board of Directors who were directors immediately prior to such Change in Control) then with respect to all matters thereafter arising concerning the rights of Indemnitee to payments of Expenses and Expense Advances under this Agreement or any other agreement or under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws as now or hereafter in effect, the Company shall seek legal advice only from legal counsel selected by Indemnitee and approved by the Company (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) (“Independent Legal Counsel”). Such counsel, among other things, shall render its written opinion to the Company and Indemnitee as to whether and to what extent Indemnitee would be permitted to be indemnified under applicable law. The Company agrees to pay the reasonable fees of the Independent Legal Counsel referred to above and to fully indemnify such counsel against any and all expenses (including attorneys’ fees), claims, liabilities and damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its engagement pursuant hereto.

(d) Mandatory Payment of Expenses. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement other than Section 9 hereof, to the extent that Indemnitee has been successful on the merits of any cause of action or otherwise, including, without limitation, by dismissal of an action with or without prejudice, or by settlement, judgment, order or otherwise, in defense of any Claim referred to in Section l(a) hereof or in the defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses incurred by Indemnitee in connection therewith.

2. Expenses; Indemnification Procedure.

(a) Advancement of Expenses. The Company shall advance all Expenses incurred by Indemnitee. The advances to be made hereunder shall be paid by the Company to Indemnitee as soon as practicable but in any event no later than five (5) days after written demand by Indemnitee therefor to the Company.

(b) Notice/Cooperation by Indemnitee. Indemnitee shall, as a condition precedent to Indemnitee’s right to be indemnified under this Agreement, give the Company notice in writing as soon as reasonably practicable of any Claim made against Indemnitee for which indemnification will or could be sought under this Agreement; provided, however, that the failure to give any such notice shall not disqualify Indemnitee from the right, or otherwise affect in any manner any right of Indemnitee, to receive payments or advancements of Expenses unless the Company’s ability to defend in such Claim is materially and adversely prejudiced thereby, and then only to the extent thereof. Notice to the Company shall be directed to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, with a copy to the Company’s Secretary, at the address shown on the signature page of this Agreement (or such other address as the Company shall designate in writing to Indemnitee). In addition, Indemnitee shall give the Company such information and

-3-

cooperation as it may reasonably require and as shall be within Indemnitee’s power. Promptly after receipt by Indemnitee, or the Company, of any notice or document respecting the commencement of a Claim naming or involving Indemnitee and relating to an Indemnifiable Event with respect to which Indemnitee may be entitled to indemnification or an Expense Advance pursuant to this Agreement, the party receiving the same shall notify the other party promptly in writing pursuant to Section 16 hereof of such receipt, together with copies of such notice or document.

(c) No Presumptions; Burden of Proof; Determination of Good Faith and Knowledge.

(i) For purposes of this Agreement, the termination of any Claim by judgment, order, settlement (whether with or without court approval) or conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere, or its equivalent, shall not create a presumption that Indemnitee did not meet any particular standard of conduct or have any particular belief or that a court has determined that indemnification is not permitted by applicable law. In addition, neither the failure of the Reviewing Party to have made a determination as to whether Indemnitee has met any particular standard of conduct or had any particular belief, nor an actual determination by the Reviewing Party that Indemnitee has not met such standard of conduct or did not have such belief, prior to the commencement of legal proceedings by Indemnitee to secure a judicial determination that Indemnitee should be indemnified under applicable law, shall be a defense to Indemnitee’s claim or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met any particular standard of conduct or did not have any particular belief. In connection with any determination by the Reviewing Party or otherwise as to whether the Indemnitee is entitled to be indemnified hereunder, the burden of proof shall be on the Company to establish that Indemnitee is not so entitled.

(ii) For purposes of any determination of good faith, Indemnitee shall be deemed to have acted in good faith and in a manner Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company or, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, to have had no reasonable cause to believe Indemnitee’s conduct was unlawful, if Indemnitee’s action was based on the records or books of account of the Company (or other applicable enterprise), including financial statements, or on information supplied to Indemnitee by the officers of the Company (or other applicable enterprise) in the course of their duties, or on the advice of legal counsel for the Company (or other applicable enterprise) or the Board of Directors or counsel selected by any committee of the Board of Directors or on information or records given or reports made to the Company (or other applicable enterprise) by an independent certified public accountant or by an appraiser, investment banker or other expert selected with reasonable care by the Company (or other applicable enterprise) or the Board of Directors or any committee of the Board of Directors. The provisions of this

-4-

Section 2(c) shall not be deemed to be exclusive or to limit in any way the other circumstances in which the Indemnitee may be deemed to have met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in this Agreement.

(iii) The knowledge and/or actions, or failure to act, of any director, officer, agent or employee of the Company shall not be imputed to Indemnitee for purposes of determining the right to indemnification under this Agreement.

(d) Notice to Insurers. If, at the time of the receipt by the Company of a notice of a Claim pursuant to Section 2(b) hereof, the Company has liability insurance in effect which may cover such Claim, the Company shall give prompt notice of the commencement of such Claim to the insurers in accordance with the procedures set forth in the respective policies. The Company shall thereafter take all necessary or desirable action to cause such insurers to pay, on behalf of the Indemnitee, all amounts payable as a result of such Claim in accordance with the terms of such policies.

(e) Selection of Counsel. In the event the Company shall be obligated hereunder to pay the Expenses of any Claim, the Company, if appropriate, shall be entitled to assume the defense of such Claim, with counsel approved by Indemnitee (“Retained Counsel”), upon the delivery to Indemnitee of written notice of its election so to do. After delivery of such notice, approval of Retained Counsel by Indemnitee and the retention of Retained Counsel by the Company, the Company will not be liable to Indemnitee under this Agreement for any fees of separate counsel (“Separate Counsel”) subsequently incurred by Indemnitee with respect to the same Claim; provided that, Indemnitee shall have the right to employ Separate Counsel in any such Claim (i) at Indemnitee’s expense or (ii) if (A) the employment of Separate Counsel by Indemnitee has been previously authorized by the Company, (B) Indemnitee shall have reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest between the Company and Indemnitee in the conduct of any such defense, or (C) the Company fails to assume the defense of such Claim in a timely manner or the Company shall not continue to retain Retained Counsel to defend such Claim, then the fees and expenses of Indemnitee’s Separate Counsel shall be at the expense of the Company.

(f) Defense by Company. In the event the Company has assumed the defense of a Claim pursuant to Section 2(e), the Company shall not, without the prior written consent of Indemnitee, consent to the entry of any judgment against Indemnitee or enter into any settlement or compromise which (i) includes an admission of fault of Indemnitee, (ii) involves damages other than solely the payment of monetary damages or (iii) does not include, as an unconditional term thereof, the full release of Indemnitee from all liability in respect of such Claim, which release shall be in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Indemnitee.

-5-

3. Additional Indemnification Rights; Nonexclusivity.

(a) Scope. The Company hereby agrees to indemnify the Indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by law, notwithstanding that such indemnification is not specifically authorized by the other provisions of this Agreement, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, the Company’s Bylaws or by statute. In the event of any change after the date of this Agreement in any applicable law, statute or rule which expands the right of a Delaware corporation to indemnify a member of its board of directors or an officer, employee, agent or fiduciary, it is the intent of the parties hereto that Indemnitee shall enjoy by this Agreement the greater benefits afforded by such change. In the event of any change in any applicable law, statute or rule which narrows the right of a Delaware corporation to indemnify a member of its board of directors or an officer, employee, agent or fiduciary, such change, to the extent not otherwise required by such law, statute or rule to be applied to this Agreement, shall have no effect on this Agreement or the parties’ rights and obligations hereunder, except as set forth in Section 8(a) hereof.

(b) Nonexclusivity. The indemnification provided by this Agreement shall be in addition to any rights to which Indemnitee may be entitled under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, its Bylaws, any other agreement, any vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or otherwise. The indemnification provided under this Agreement shall continue as to Indemnitee for any action taken or not taken while serving at the request of the Company in an indemnified capacity even though Indemnitee may have ceased to serve in such capacity.

4. No Duplication of Payments. The Company shall not be liable under this Agreement to make any payment in connection with any Claim made against Indemnitee to the extent Indemnitee has otherwise actually received payment (under any insurance policy, Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaw or otherwise) of the amounts otherwise indemnifiable hereunder.

5. Partial Indemnification. If Indemnitee is entitled under any provision of this Agreement to indemnification by the Company for some or a portion of Expenses incurred in connection with any Claim, but not, however, for all of the total amount thereof, the Company shall nevertheless indemnify Indemnitee for the portion of such Expenses to which Indemnitee is entitled.

6. Mutual Acknowledgment. Both the Company and Indemnitee acknowledge that in certain instances, Federal law or applicable public policy may prohibit the Company from indemnifying its directors, officers, employees, agents or fiduciaries under this Agreement or otherwise. Indemnitee understands and acknowledges that the Company has undertaken or may be required in the future to undertake with the Securities and Exchange Commission to submit the question of indemnification to a court in certain circumstances for a determination of the Company’s right under public policy to indemnify Indemnitee.

-6-

7. Liability Insurance. The Company will use its best efforts to maintain, with financially sound and reputable companies, insurance policies providing the Indemnitee with coverage for any Indemnifiable Event hereunder, such policies to be in such form and amounts and having such coverage as may be customary for companies engaged in the same or a similar business and of a similar size as the Company, as certified by the Company’s insurance broker. The Company shall provide the Indemnitee with (a) evidence of such insurance and, upon request, copies of such policies and (b) advance notice of any amendment, modification, cancellation or other changes relating thereto. To the extent the Company maintains liability insurance applicable to directors, officers, employees, agents or fiduciaries, Indemnitee shall be named as an insured covered by such policies in such a manner as to provide Indemnitee the same rights and benefits as are accorded to the most favorably insured of the Company’s directors, if Indemnitee is a director; or of the Company’s officers, if Indemnitee is not a director of the Company but is an officer; or of the Company’s key employees, agents or fiduciaries, if Indemnitee is not an officer or director but is a key employee, agent or fiduciary.

8. Exceptions. Any other provision herein to the contrary notwithstanding, the Company shall not be obligated pursuant to the terms of this Agreement:

(a) Excluded Action or Omissions. To indemnify Indemnitee for acts, omissions or transactions to the extent Indemnitee may not be indemnified under applicable law.

(b) Claims Initiated by Indemnitee. To indemnify or advance expenses to Indemnitee with respect to Claims initiated or brought voluntarily by Indemnitee and not by way of defense, except (i) with respect to actions or proceedings brought to establish or enforce a right to indemnification under this Agreement or any other agreement or insurance policy or under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws now or hereafter in effect relating to Claims for Indemnifiable Events, (ii) in specific cases if the Board of Directors has approved the initiation or bringing of such Claim, or (iii) as otherwise as required under Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, regardless of whether Indemnitee ultimately is determined to be entitled to such indemnification, advance expense payment or insurance recovery, as the case may be.

(c) Lack of Good Faith. To indemnify Indemnitee for any expenses incurred by the Indemnitee with respect to any proceeding instituted by Indemnitee to enforce or interpret this Agreement, if a court of competent jurisdiction determines that each of the material assertions made by the Indemnitee in such proceeding was not made in good faith or was frivolous.

-7-

(d) Claims Under Section 16. To indemnify Indemnitee for expenses and the payment of profits arising from the purchase and sale by Indemnitee of securities in violation of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or any similar successor statute, rules or regulations.

9. Period of Limitations. No legal action shall be brought and no cause of action shall be asserted by or in the right of the Company against Indemnitee after the expiration of two years from the date of accrual of such cause of action, and any claim or cause of action of the Company shall be extinguished and deemed released unless asserted by the timely filing of a legal action within such two-year period; provided, however, that if any shorter period of limitations is otherwise applicable to any such cause of action, such shorter period shall govern.

10. Definitions

For the purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meaning assigned to them hereunder:

(a) Change in Control shall mean any event in which:

(i) any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), other than a trustee or other fiduciary (acting in such capacity) holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or a corporation owned directly or indirectly by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company, is or becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under said Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing more than 15% of the total voting power represented by the Company’s then outstanding Voting Securities.

(ii) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board of Directors of the Company and any new directors whose election by the Board of Directors or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least three quarters (3/4) of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority thereof; or

(iii) the stockholders of the Company approve a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the Voting Securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into Voting Securities of the surviving entity) at least 80% of the total voting power represented by the Voting Securities of the Company or such surviving

-8-

entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

(b) Claim shall mean any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, appeal, proceeding, arbitration, or alternative dispute resolution mechanism, or any hearing, inquiry or investigation that Indemnitee in good faith believes might lead to the institution of any such action, suit, appeal, proceeding, arbitration or alternative dispute resolution mechanism, whether civil, criminal, administrative, investigative or other.

(c) Company shall mean and include, in addition to Silicon Graphics, Inc. and any successor corporation, any constituent corporation (including any constituent of a constituent) absorbed in a consolidation or merger which, if its separate existence were continued, would have had power and authority to indemnify its directors, officers, employees, agents or fiduciaries, so that if Indemnitee is or was a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary of such constituent corporation, or is or was serving at the request of such constituent corporation as a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, employee benefit plan, trust or other enterprise, Indemnitee shall stand in the same position under the provisions of this Agreement with respect to the resulting or surviving corporation as Indemnitee would have with respect to such constituent corporation if its separate existence had continued.

(d) Expenses shall mean and include any and all expenses, including attorneys’ fees (including retainers) and all other costs, expenses and obligations incurred in connection with investigating, defending, being a witness in or participating in (including on appeal), or preparing to defend, be a witness in or participate in, any action, suit, proceeding, arbitration, alternative dispute resolution mechanism, hearing, inquiry or investigation, and any and all judgments, fines, penalties and amounts paid in settlement (if such settlement is approved in advance by the Company, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) of any Claim and any federal, state, local or foreign taxes imposed on the Indemnitee as a result of the actual or deemed receipt of any payments under this Agreement.

(e) Indemnifiable Event shall mean any event or occurrence related to the fact that Indemnitee is or was a director, officer, partner, employee, trustee, agent or fiduciary of the Company, or any subsidiary of the Company, or is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, partner, employee, trustee, agent or fiduciary of any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, which imposes duties on, or involves services by, such director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary while serving in such capacity, or by reason of any action or inaction on the part of Indemnitee in such capacity.

-9-

(f) Reviewing Party shall mean any appropriate person or body consisting of a member or members of the Company’s Board of Directors or any other person or body appointed by the Board of Directors who is not a party to the particular Claim for which Indemnitee is seeking indemnification, or Independent Legal Counsel.

(g) Voting Securities shall mean any securities of the Company that vote generally in the election of directors.

11. Remedies of Indemnitee.

(a) Right to Petition Court. In the event that Indemnitee makes a request for payment of Expenses hereunder and the Company fails to make such payment or advancement in a timely manner pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, Indemnitee may petition the Delaware Chancery Court to enforce the Company’s obligations under this Agreement.

(b) Burden of Proof. In any judicial proceeding brought under Section 11(a) above, the Company shall have the burden of proving that Indemnitee is not entitled to payment of Expenses hereunder.

(c) Expenses. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Company agrees to reimburse Indemnitee in full for any expenses incurred by Indemnitee in connection with investigating, preparing for, litigating, defending or settling any action brought by Indemnitee under Section 11(a) above, or in connection with any claim or counterclaim brought by the Company in connection therewith, if Indemnitee is successful in whole or in part in connection with any such action.

12. Representations and Warranties of the Company. The Company hereby represents and warrants to Indemnitee as follows:

(a) Authority. The Company has all necessary power and authority to enter into, and be bound by the terms of, this Agreement, and the execution, delivery and performance of the undertakings contemplated by this Agreement have been duly authorized by the Company.

(b) Enforceability. This Agreement, when executed and delivered by the Company in accordance with the provisions hereof, shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium, reorganization or similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally.

13. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

-10-

14. Binding Effect; Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective successors, assigns, including any direct or indirect successor by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company, spouses, heirs, and personal and legal representatives. The Company shall require and cause any successor (whether direct or indirect by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise) to all, substantially all, or a substantial part, of the business and/or assets of the Company, by written agreement in form and substance satisfactory to Indemnitee, expressly to assume and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform if no such succession had taken place. This Agreement shall continue in effect regardless of whether Indemnitee continues to serve as a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary (as applicable) of the Company or of any other enterprise at the Company’s request.

15. Attorneys’ Fees. In the event that any action is instituted by Indemnitee under this Agreement or under any liability insurance policies maintained by the Company to enforce or interpret any of the terms hereof or thereof, Indemnitee shall be entitled to be paid all Expenses incurred by Indemnitee with respect to such action, regardless of whether Indemnitee is ultimately successful in such action, and shall be entitled to the advancement of Expenses with respect to such action, unless as a part of such action a court of competent jurisdiction over such action determines that each of the material assertions made by Indemnitee as a basis for such action were not made in good faith or were frivolous. In the event of an action instituted by or in the name of the Company under this Agreement to enforce or interpret any of the terms of this Agreement, Indemnitee shall be entitled to be paid all Expenses incurred by Indemnitee in defense of such action (including costs and expenses incurred with respect to Indemnitee’s counterclaims and cross-claims made in such action), and shall be entitled to the advancement of Expenses with respect to such action, unless as a part of such action a court having jurisdiction over such action determines that each of Indemnitee’s material defenses to such action were made in bad faith or were frivolous.

16. Notice. All notices, requests, demands and other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given (i) if delivered by hand or courier service and signed for by the addressee, on the date of such receipt, or (ii) if mailed by domestic certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, on the third business day after the date postmarked. Addresses for notice to either party are as shown on the signature page of this Agreement, or as subsequently modified by written notice.

17. Consent to Jurisdiction. The Company and Indemnitee each hereby irrevocably consent to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of Delaware for all purposes in connection with any action or proceeding which arises out of or relates to this Agreement and agree that any action instituted under this Agreement shall be commenced, prosecuted and continued only in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County, which shall be the exclusive and only proper forum for adjudicating such a claim.

-11-

18. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement shall be severable in the event that any of the provisions hereof (including any provision within a single section, paragraph or sentence) are held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, and the remaining provisions shall remain enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. Furthermore, to the fullest extent possible, the provisions of this Agreement (including, without limitations, each portion of this Agreement containing any provision held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, that is not itself invalid, void or unenforceable) shall be construed so as to give effect to the intent manifested by the provision held invalid, illegal or unenforceable.

19. Choice of Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and its provisions construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, as applied to contracts between Delaware residents, entered into and to be performed entirely within the State of Delaware, without regard to the conflict of laws principles thereof.

20. Subrogation. In the event of any payment of Expenses under this Agreement, the Company shall be subrogated to the extent of such payment to all of the rights of recovery of Indemnitee against other persons and Indemnitee shall execute all documents required and shall do all acts that may be necessary to secure such rights and to enable the Company effectively to bring suit to enforce such rights.

21. Amendment and Termination. No amendment, modification, termination or cancellation of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing signed by both the parties hereto. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provisions hereof (whether or not similar) nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver.

22. Integration and Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding between the parties hereto and supersedes and merges all previous written and oral negotiations, commitments, understandings and agreements relating to the subject matter hereof between the parties hereto (other than the indemnity provisions of the Company’s certificate of incorporation and by-laws, each as amended).

23. No Construction as Employment Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as giving Indemnitee any right to be retained in the employ of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, nor shall this Agreement impose any obligation on Indemnitee to continue Indemnitee’s service to the Company beyond any period required by law or by other agreements or commitments of the parties, if any. Indemnitee may at any time and for any reason resign from such position (subject to any other contractual obligation or any obligation imposed by operation of law), upon which event the Company will have no obligation to continue Indemnitee in such position.

-12-

Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement shall continue in force after Indemnitee has ceased to serve as a director of the Company.

24. No Conflicts. The Company acknowledges and agrees that the Indemnitee may be engaged in one or more businesses for compensation other than serving as a director of the Company and such other activities shall in no way, except to the extent required by law, relieve the Company of its indemnification obligations hereunder. The Company acknowledges and agrees that the Indemnitee’s affiliates may be engaged in one or more businesses other than acting as a shareholder and creditor of the Company. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, there shall be no restrictions on the Indemnitee or any of the Indemnitee’s affiliates as to exclusivity or otherwise, the Indemnitee and any of the Indemnitee’s affiliates shall be free to pursue or invest in any business opportunities, whether as a shareholder, lender or in any other capacity, without any obligation to the Company, except to the extent required by law, and the Company expressly waives any interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, any business opportunities that are presented to the Indemnitee or any of the Indemnitee’s affiliates.

-13-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as of the date first above written.

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.
By:
	Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary

Address:

1200 Crittenden Lane

Mountain View, CA 94043-1351

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

INDEMNITEE:

-14-

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

Summary of November 7, 2006 Performance Bonus Awards

On November 7, 2006, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) of Silicon Graphics, Inc. (the “Company”) approved performance bonus awards under the FY2007 SGI Cash Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”) for certain of the Company’s executives, including all executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. The Bonus Plan is an annual, performance-based incentive plan for designated employees, managers and executives not otherwise participating in a commission-based sales compensation plan. The primary purpose of the bonus plan is to align and motivate all participants behind a consistent set of companywide financial metrics. The performance goals for executive participants are comprised of corporate financial objectives, weighted at 70% of the total bonus target (consisting of revenue and operating income targets, each weighted at 35% of the total bonus target), and functional/individual objectives identified by the senior management team or Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate, weighted at 30% of the total bonus target.

Participating executive officers are eligible for target bonus amounts based on a percentage of their base salary ranging from 40% to 100%, depending on the participant’s position. The maximum bonus opportunity for executive officers under the Bonus Plan ranges from 54% to 135% of base salary, depending on the participant’s position. Participants will receive the maximum bonus opportunity only if each of the corporate performance measures exceed full achievement, up to the maximum allowed by the plan, and individual performance measures established are fully achieved.

The following table sets forth the base salary, bonus target and maximum bonus opportunity, as a percentage of base salary, for the awards under the Bonus Plan made to the Company’s named executive officers on November 7, 2006 (other than Chief Executive Officer, who did not receive an award on such date).

Name and Title	Target		Maximum		Base Salary
Kathy Lanterman, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	50	%	67.5	%	$	310,000
Eng Lim Goh, Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer	50	%	67.5	%	$	328,500
Barry Weinert, Vice President and General Counsel	40	%	54	%	$	250,000

The actual bonuses payable under the Bonus Plan, if any, will vary depending on the extent to which actual performance meets, exceeds or falls short of the objectives. At the end of the performance period, which aligns with the fiscal year, achievement of the objectives will be evaluated by the Committee and the amount of any bonus will be determined. Awards for the corporate and individual objective components of the Bonus Plan will be determined separately and added together to determine the total payment; however, no bonus payment will be made unless a minimum threshold of corporate financial achievement is attained. The Committee retains the discretion to reduce or increase the bonus amount otherwise payable under the Bonus Plan based on actual performance. The Committee may terminate or modify the Bonus Plan at any time.

On November 7, 2006, the Committee also approved a separate special performance bonus for Kathy Lanterman, the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of up to $150,000 based on the achievement of certain performance metrics. The performance metrics are tied to the Company’s successful emergence from Chapter 11 proceedings and the completion of the Company’s audit, preparation of financial statements and SEC reporting obligations for fiscal 2006 and the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The performance period ends on November 30, 2006 at which time the achievement of the metrics will be evaluated by the Committee and the amount of any special bonus will be determined.

1

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

FORM OF 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis McKenna, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Silicon Graphics, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006

/s/ Dennis McKenna

Dennis McKenna

Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

FORM OF 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Kathy Lanterman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Silicon Graphics, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006

/s/ Kathy Lanterman

Kathy Lanterman

Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

FORM OF 906 CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Dennis McKenna, the Chief Executive Officer and Kathy Lanterman, the Chief Financial Officer of Silicon Graphics, Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his/her knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Silicon Graphics, Inc.

Date: November 13, 2006

	/s/ Dennis McKenna
Name:	Dennis McKenna
	Chief Executive Officer

	/s/ Kathy Lanterman
Name:	Kathy Lanterman
	Chief Financial Officer