INCOME TAXES	3 Months Ended
Mar. 28, 2015
INCOME TAXES	NOTE 6. INCOME TAXES For the first quarter of 2015, the Company’s effective tax rate was primarily impacted by valuation allowances, which limited the recognition of deferred tax benefits for pretax losses in certain tax jurisdictions while income tax expense was recognized in tax jurisdictions with pretax earnings. The effective tax rate was also impacted by nondeductible foreign interest and other nondeductible expenses. Due to the Company’s valuation allowances, interim income tax reporting is likely to result in significant variability of the effective tax rate throughout the course of the year. Changes in pretax income projections and the mix of income across jurisdictions could also impact the effective tax rate each quarter. The Company has significant deferred tax assets in the U.S. and in certain foreign jurisdictions against which valuation allowances have been established to reduce such deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company recognized income tax expense of $3 million associated with the establishment of valuation allowances in certain foreign jurisdictions because the realizability of the related deferred tax assets was no longer more likely than not. As of the first quarter of 2015, valuation allowances remain in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions where the Company believes it is necessary to see further positive evidence, such as sustained achievement of cumulative profits, before these valuation allowances can be released. The Company will continue to assess the realizability of its deferred tax assets. The Company files a U.S. federal income tax return and other income tax returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal and state and local income tax examinations for years before 2013 and 2009, respectively. The acquired OfficeMax U.S. consolidated group is no longer subject to U.S. federal and state and local income tax examinations for years before 2010 and 2006, respectively. The U.S. federal income tax returns for 2013 and 2014 are currently under review. Generally, the Company is subject to routine examination for years 2008 and forward in its international tax jurisdictions. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company increased by $4 million its estimate of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the effective tax rate because the related tax positions are not expected to be offset by valuation allowances. The Company did not change its total balance of unrecognized tax benefits, which was $23 million as of the first quarter of 2015. It is reasonably possible that certain tax positions will be resolved within the next 12 months, which would decrease the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits by $4 million but would not affect the effective tax rate due to an offsetting change in valuation allowance. Additionally, the Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that new issues will be raised or resolved by tax authorities that may require changes to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits; however, an estimate of such changes cannot be reasonably made.

NOTE 6. INCOME TAXES

For the first quarter of 2015, the Company’s effective tax rate was primarily impacted by valuation allowances, which limited the recognition of deferred tax benefits for pretax losses in certain tax jurisdictions while income tax expense was recognized in tax jurisdictions with pretax earnings. The effective tax rate was also impacted by nondeductible foreign interest and other nondeductible expenses. Due to the Company’s valuation allowances, interim income tax reporting is likely to result in significant variability of the effective tax rate throughout the course of the year. Changes in pretax income projections and the mix of income across jurisdictions could also impact the effective tax rate each quarter.

The Company has significant deferred tax assets in the U.S. and in certain foreign jurisdictions against which valuation allowances have been established to reduce such deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company recognized income tax expense of $3 million associated with the establishment of valuation allowances in certain foreign jurisdictions because the realizability of the related deferred tax assets was no longer more likely than not. As of the first quarter of 2015, valuation allowances remain in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions where the Company believes it is necessary to see further positive evidence, such as sustained achievement of cumulative profits, before these valuation allowances can be released. The Company will continue to assess the realizability of its deferred tax assets.

The Company files a U.S. federal income tax return and other income tax returns in various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal and state and local income tax examinations for years before 2013 and 2009, respectively. The acquired OfficeMax U.S. consolidated group is no longer subject to U.S. federal and state and local income tax examinations for years before 2010 and 2006, respectively. The U.S. federal income tax returns for 2013 and 2014 are currently under review. Generally, the Company is subject to routine examination for years 2008 and forward in its international tax jurisdictions.

During the first quarter of 2015, the Company increased by $4 million its estimate of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the effective tax rate because the related tax positions are not expected to be offset by valuation allowances. The Company did not change its total balance of unrecognized tax benefits, which was $23 million as of the first quarter of 2015. It is reasonably possible that certain tax positions will be resolved within the next 12 months, which would decrease the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits by $4 million but would not affect the effective tax rate due to an offsetting change in valuation allowance. Additionally, the Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that new issues will be raised or resolved by tax authorities that may require changes to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits; however, an estimate of such changes cannot be reasonably made.